NHL Free Agency: Contracts to covet, contracts to mock

"Stop fighting! You're on the same team!" - Ron Chenoy-USA TODAY Sports

What were your favorite deals? Which ones would you like to have? Which ones would you mock?

After much of the dust has settled from the opening missiles of NHL free agency, we can browse around the league and reports about the New York Islanders' approach to do something totally appropriate for this Independence Day weekend: Covet our neighbors' goods.

The first 48 hours of free agency are fun for a variety of reasons, one of them being you are literally seeing 30 teams try to win at Musical Chairs, Monopoly, and Screw My Successor all at once. It proceeds with the speed of day 2 of the draft (when picks from rounds 2 through 7 come off the board in rapid succession, allowing little time for off-the-list thought), yet there is a whole lot more research, data and money in play.

Though all of this stuff is hashed and rehashed in comments to our breaking news and bits posts, I'm interested in opinions on some of the contracts handed out around the league, and whether you'd take them. (You can weigh the sequence and "only if we hadn't added X," or you can consider them in a vacuum. It's your forum.)

We'll start with the baseline...

What the Islanders Did

It's clear from reports, many via Newsday's Arthur Staple and the Post's Brett Cyrgalis, but also from other hockey media, that the Islanders made concerted and better-than-they-settled-for bids for at least Dan Boyle, Thomas Vanek and Brad Richards.

While the initial report was the Islanders only bid "a little stronger" than Minnesota's contract for Vanek, it turns out they returned to the table with the long-term offer too. But as he later said and finally admitted on NHL Network, the Isles were his second choice, but only if things didn't work out in Minnesota. Yearlong rumor (and tampering) now finally confirmed.

Personally, for all three of the above cases, I'm thinking it could be a happy accident then none of the players accepted.

Meanwhile, the Isles did add: on the sides (Chad Johnson for backup, T.J. Brennan for Weight's powerplay toy), in Bridgeport (Skille, Mallrat, more), and in the top 9 on day two (Grabovski, Kulemin).

What Others Did

Here is where I'll toss up a totally-not-comprehensive list of other deals that interested me, for better or worse. (Feel free to add/discuss more from this full list.)

Washington signs Matt Niskanen, Brooks Orpik to crazy money.

Niskanen is a wonderful topic, because reasonable people can differ over how valuable he is. Personally, I didn't want him for the rumored asking price (7 years, $40 million), which turned out to be exactly what he wanted. No, no, for the love of a Kyle Okposo KO punch, no. But I get that there is debate on this. Time will tell.

What isn't debatable is the absurdity of the Orpik contract (5 years, $27.5 million). For the love of Mario's respect for the game, what a foolish outlay for a meathead whose effectiveness will delightfully decline before our very eyes.

Which makes it hurt with what the rival Penguins did...

Pittsburgh gets Christian Ehrhoff for one year, $4 million.

I don't think there's a single person who wouldn't love this deal. As with Vanek, Paul Stastny and Richards, however, this appears to be a case of the player valuing situation over money. (We saw what happened last time Ehrhoff chased strictly money.)

Speaking of which...

Paul Stastny to St. Louis for four years, $28 million.

It's an overpay, but in the current CBA environment I've held that I don't mind overpayments for good players if the term is reasonable. Four years in your mid- to late-30s is dangerous. Four years in the athletic prime is just fine. Stastny is from St. Louis, Blues GM Doug Armstrong is set on limiting the length of deals, and both found a match.

Speaking of which, an underrated move for the Blues on this day was getting "defected" former draft pick Jori Lehtera to finally come over from the KHL. This should be another major addition, and only deepens the insane arms race that has made the Western Conference vastly superior to the patsies we watch in the East on a nightly basis.

They did suffer a minor loss, however...

Adam Cracknell to the Kings

This is obviously a very minor move, but I thought I'd note it for what it reflects: The Blues have tried to copy the Kings by building a rotating cast of effective fourth-liners to avoid a massive dropoff after their good top lines. Cracknell was one of those guys to fill in capably when needed. Under-the-radar signing, but one that helps L.A. as it manages its cap and approach to sustaining its contender status.

Brian Gionta to Buffalo for 3 years, $12.7 million

Not a bad contract, but awfully curious choice. I heard in the morning before the starting bell that Gionta wanted to go to Buffalo. It's like all that excitement and playoffs in Montreal was too much. Weird. I smell Brian Rolston.

Ryan Miller to Vancouver for 3 years, $18 million; Al Montoya to Florida, Jonas Hiller to Calgary, Evgeni Nabokov to Tampa Bay, Justin Peters to Washington, etc.

I am damn glad the Isles added Jaroslav Halak. And Chad Johnson was a decent grab for backup.

Blake Comeau to Pittsburgh for 1 year, $700,000

McNally weeps.

Ales Hemsky to Dallas for 3 years, $12 million

I would've done that deal for the Isles in a heartbeat. Not a crazy commitment for a talented player. Grabovski gives the Isles good depth and flexibility down the middle, but Hemsky would've been an interesting (if injury-prone) addition to their wing.

Jarome Iginla to Colorado for 3 years, $16 million

Great as Iginla has been, I can't help thinking this deal will be regretted as he enters his age 37, 38 and 39 seasons. This is the team that got rid of P.A. Parenteau for a washed-up Daniel Briere, too. Odd moves.

Dave Bolland to Florida for 5 years, $27.5 million

What? Good for Toronto, I guess. Dale Tallon grabs yet another former Hawk.

Matt Moulson to Buffalo for 5 years, $25 million

Good for Moulson, who actually got one of the more lucrative contracts given out this week. His parting with the Isles has been rehashed over and over, from the idea he would want this much and the Isles would prefer that outlay for someone else who was more of a driver on the first line (like Vanek, who declined, but also has his own limitations).

The final verdict probably falls on how productive Moulson remains or continues to be as he goes into his 30s, and how the Isles' youngsters and fallback UFA additions do in their place.

Who'd You Covet? Who'd You Mock?

Alright, those were my initial reactions to ones that caught my eye. We've already discussed the Isles' moves a ton, but in the light of a few days hindsight, which other teams' deals did you love or hate?

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Lighthouse Hockey

You must be a member of Lighthouse Hockey to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Lighthouse Hockey. You should read them.

Join Lighthouse Hockey

You must be a member of Lighthouse Hockey to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Lighthouse Hockey. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9355_tracker