JP's January Plus/Minus Poll
Editor's Note: Back by popular demand, from the depths of a brain and muse scientists will one day want to examine but will likely find elusive like some such Heisenberg Principle, here is JPinVA's monthly plus/minus for January.
The good news: January was a playoff pace month. The bad news: January was the only one of those thus far. The fun news: Home attendance average is up -- and this thing hasn't even become trendy in Brooklyn yet.
Notes and figures follow. Poll is at the bottom.
TEAM STATS
+ (RECORD) 13-7-5-1-15/1.15PPG
DEC(14-6-6-2-14/1.00), NOV(13-4-7-2-10/.77),OCT(9-3-4-2-8/.89), TOT(49-20-22-7-47/.96PPG)
If you use a 90PT season as the benchmark for a "playoff team" then you need about 1.10PG. That makes this a playoff level month. But it’s the first one this season and they will need 43 points in 33 games or a 1.30PPG pace. Their best over the past two years has been a 1.21 pace last February. To keep pace they’ll need ~18 points in the 14 February games.
+ (Goals For) 35/2.69
DEC(39/2.79), NOV(25/1.92),OCT(18/2.00), TOT(117/2.39)
This scoring pace continues to improve the season average. They need some secondary scoring, which will probably come as they improve the defense, and inject some youth (Rakhshani and Ullstrom) into the lineup.
+ (Goals Against) 32/2.46
DEC(43/3.07), NOV(46/3.54), OCT(22/2.44), TOT(143/2.92)
This vast improvement over the past two months and brings their season average below 3 again. This is a sign of improved goaltending and some tweaking of the defensive strategy. The bulk of the goaltending was handled by Nabokov, who was solid all month. They have been more aggressive in the neutral zone and this is paying off by not allowing opponents to enter their zone with speed. The improvement (recovery) of both Macdonald and Streit has helped as well.
- (EV Goal Diff) -4/-0.30
DEC(-9/-0.64), NOV(-15/-1.15), OCT(-6/-0.66), TOT(-34/-.41)
Their even strength performance has improved, but not to a level that should be acceptable. The main issue is secondary scoring. The PK has been terrific, so they will need to compliment that by playing a little tighter when they are at even strength. Most of this will be addressed with roster changes in the next few months. One improvement has been the fourth line. Wallace was an immediate improvement over Pandolfo, and when Pandolfo returned to replace Reasoner, Nino seemed to get a little more responsible. The next wave should be the upgrade from Rolston to Rakhshani.
+ PP (9/34/26%)
DEC(11/47/23%), NOV4/39/10%), OCT(7/33/21%), TOT(31/153/20%)
Except for November the PP has been a real positive. I blame it on Brian Rolston and mustaches. Their season level of 20% is 5th in the league.
+ PK (28/30/93%)
DEC(33/39/85%), NOV(33/43/77%), OCT(30/35/86%), TOT(124/147/84%)
93% is the best percentage they’ve achieved in the past two years and is among the tops in the league. Their season level of 84% is 8th in the league.
+ Attendance (12,670/27games)
Last year through 27 games their average attendance was 9,893. People are starting to come back!
GOALTENDING
+ Evgeni Nabokov (6-4-0) Very solid #1 performance. He carried a winning team through January. This leaves the team with some options. He is most likely being shopped, but if Montoya can’t match his performance would signing him for another year with the stable they have in BPT and Europe sound that bad. They are very deep at a position they were at rock bottom with two years ago.
? Al Montoya (incomplete) His one start was okay, but the other team was invisible to the refs.
- Rick Dipietro (infirmed) no starts.
+ Kevin Poulin (1-1) Had a tremendous January in BPT only to have it halted by a backup cold spell followed by a rusty 2 minutes. His next call up against Carolina was the kind of game the Isles needed. He made all the tough stops early and they picked up the pace to beat the canes. He is another reason why the Islanders will have a lot of options going into the trade deadline.
FORWARDS
30G club
+ John Tavares (49-22-31-52/+4) (13-9-13-22/+11)
DEC(14-5-10-15/-3) NOV(13-1-4-5/-2) OCT(9-7-4-11/-2)
It’s almost safe to say that John Tavares has ARRIVED. Two months do not a career make. But he has been showing this new form all year and just waiting for his teammates to catch up. It’s easy to say that JT, at 22, is the best forward the islanders have drafted since the dynasty era. If that doesn’t make him “generational” WHO CARES! He’s definitely in the top 30 under the age of 25.
+ Matt Moulson (49-23-23-46/+11) (13-6-11-17/+8)
DEC (9-9-18/+3) NOV(13-6-2-8/+1) OCT(9-2-3-5/-1)
Moulson is having his best run as an Islander… and that’s saying a lot for a guy who’s put home 30 goals two years in a row. January has pulled him very close to PPG pace which is phenomenal when you consider how much they gave up to get him… Neil Smith…this is a big deal! BTW: Don’t discount Matty’s DEC and JAN as motivation for JT’s outright EXPLOSION. The competition between the two has been incredible since they started playing together in 2009. When Matty starts making babies JT is going to have to start his very own reality show… if you know what I mean.
- Michael Grabner (48-14-7-21/-14) (13-4-1-5/-2)
DEC(3-2-5/-9) NOV(13-4-4-8/-1) OCT(9-3-0-3/-2)
Three and four goal months are not what the islanders want to see out of Michael Grabner. He’s recently engaged and has a little gremlin running around the house. That hasn’t seemed to affect his effort, but he just isn’t finishing enough opportunities. I think with a little stability with Nielsen and Parentau, he should have a nice February. I don’t think it will put him back on the 30 goal map, but a 20-25 goal season with all of the terrific PK and defense he plays is fine. (-14) is a little concerning at this stage of the season.
+ Kyle Okposo was added to the top line at the end of December. All he’s done is put up a (13-6-6-12/+6) “devilish” month of January. Those are the kind of numbers we have expected from Kyle when he matured… and he’s definitely paying off. Kyle helped FNGO become something special last year. There is no doubt that JT and Matty six-pack have helped him find a little more offense, but Kyle is more than pulling his weight on a high octane first line.
- Brian Rolston. Do I really need to recount another listless month? Hello Rhett, hopefully means adios Brian. (12-0-0-0/-7)… anybody wanna do a COZO for this BOZO? This is how we teach the kids how to be winners? He deserves the same fate as Blake Comeau. Thanks for givin' in the ol' college try. Enjoy your retirement.
Defensemen
+ Travis Hamonic . No need to put up stats… he’s going to be here with a plus as long as I’m doing these and he is performing at this level.
+ Andrew Macdonald…is back. January was a very good month for the first pairing. Neither is racking up the points thus far, but both are engaged and making good hockey decisions.
- Mark Streit. This is the second month in a row I’m giving Streit a minus. The islanders scored 9 PP goals in JAN and Mark Streit had a hand in 6 of them. He may have had a hand in more but he had 1PPG and 5PPA in Jan. That’s pretty much it. His decisions have been awkward at best. Mostly bad. He doesn’t seem to have the wheels that his brain thinks he has. Some of this may be his partners, but it’s the top guy in the pairing that has to shoulder the load. His best days as an islander were with Bruno Gervais… Mark is regressing. Again, like last month, I’m going to put it on recovery time. He’s actually played a little better each month… but he hasn’t really played up to his standard since returning.
GENERAL OBSERVATONS
POS
+ Rhetturn of Rakhshani is a nice sign for the future. If Rhett can prove to be a consistent NHLer he should help solve some of the bottom six mystery and maybe help clear up the Josh Bailey conundrum.
+ The AHL Bridgeport SoundTigers had an incredible January. There are a few players on the tigers that will make a home in Uniondale some day. Kevin Poulin is surely one of them. Matt Donovan is another to keep an eye on. We have seen some good things from David Ullstrom and will probably get to see more as the NHL season progresses. One of the brightest stars is January Player of the Month, Casey Cizikas. Oddly, Casey is a rookie, but didn’t win Rookie of the Month honors.
NEG
- Why did they wait so long to sit guys like Mottau and Rolston. Why can’t we see where Wishart stands. Why can’t they give Mark Streit a few days off. In his first game back from the all-star break he earned 2 power play assists and a PLUS RATING. You have 3 roster spots to rotate guys in and out of the lineup, not to manage your cap number. Hopefully this is a lesson for next year.
What to look for in January
The playoffs are pretty much out of the question. The team can get back to respectability though. They have had some great nights by their top line, and a progression by sub-25YO prospects. A good second half by Ullstrom, Nino and maybe one of the highly touted defensive prospects(dehaan, Donovan, Katic), or even an appearance or two by Rhett or casey could give 2012 some spark.
What we saw in January
They played at a playoff pace. Respectable. Their top line may have been the best in January. The prospects in the NHL improved (Nino). David Ullstrom was injured, but we got to see a very good game by Rhett Rakhshani to close out the month.
What to look for in February. (same as January)
The trade deadline. They have two very attractive expiring contracts. Snow would do well to extend both, but he may be able to fix a deep organizational problem by trading either. The hot stove will be interesting to watch in the following months. It won’t be fun though, because losing Nielsen or Parenteau will be hard to take.
Submitted FanPosts do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog or SB Nation. If you're reading this statement, you pass the fine print legalese test. Four stars for you.
127 comments
|
Add comment
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Quick: when was the last time the 3rd or 4th line scored an ES goal?
I think you have to go back to the Detroit game, and even then, the goal was scored by Grabner, who is back to the 2nd line.
The point’s been beaten to death but bears repeating – the lack of scoring from the bottom 6 is outrageous and has been masked by the top line’s level of production. And it’s unlikely that that level is sustainable, which means that February could look more like December.
I also think that finding value (trade or waivers) when it comes to forwards than defense. The Isles’ D is flawed but so is most other team’s.
Lighthouse Hockey. Where Islanders fans come to panic with punctuation.
by DP'sknee(andhipandflubugandotherknee) on Feb 3, 2012 6:58 AM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
that should read 'finding value at forward is EASIER"
Lighthouse Hockey. Where Islanders fans come to panic with punctuation.
by DP'sknee(andhipandflubugandotherknee) on Feb 3, 2012 7:00 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
If it came to moving P.A. or Frans...
I think i would have to say I would rather Nielsen be moved, or rather i’d less like to have PA moved.
The sleeper must awaken.
This is a great read, as always.
I believe that this franchise is very close – a half year away, maybe – at getting to the next stage of the rebuild (the “steady play + contender for playoffs” level), and I for one can’t freaking wait. Next up on the agenda is sign Franzie and PAP.
Gotta beat the Sens tonight.
Being born in New York and rooting for the Islanders, Jets, and Mets. Yeah, I know.
Twitter: cmauceri524
Great job as always
I think January is as well as we can expect this year’s team to play, maybe better. It was the first month with a positive overall goal differential, which is pretty huge. While they were still a -4 at EV that’s probably about where they are unless they start getting some bottom 6 production. But the two Toronto games show why that needs to improve-if the refs don’t call much, we struggle for goals.
One quibble:
Three and four goal months are not what the islanders want to see out of Michael Grabner.
That’s 25 goals a year. I know a lot of people have him as this year’s disappointment, and we’d all like to see him repeat last year’s 35, but I’ll take 25 goals and strong PKing. He’s faced much more difficult competition this year, and has done pretty well in that role. Last year he had some great streaks where he piled up the goals on a high, high shooting percentage that was bound to dip. But I’d rather have a guy who is steady and gets them consistently, because you know a lucky streak is going to come along and give him a boost. One month like that and he’s back on pace for 30. I pointed out the other day that he’s getting .5 shot less per game this year, and that’s going to shave some goals, but I think the tradeoff of him playing the tough minutes with Frans has probably been in our favor overall.
by afrosupreme on Feb 3, 2012 8:56 AM EST reply actions 3 recs
Agree on Grabner
We got spoiled by him last year. 20+ goals per year (40-50 pts), plus playing a big role on a great PK line is good enough for me.
QuibbleQuabble
I agree with your assessment of Grabs. As I noted here.
3.5 goals for 6 months is a good pace for Grabner. The team has tried to put him in a more offensive postion. I agree with your point, and I think that if he gets more defensive responsibilities 15-20G will be a lot more important… but first they need to imporve the back line. When they had a more mobile, puck savvy defense he exploded.
That minus has garnered the most attention… I wish I could have just put his breakaway stats there.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
by JPinVA on Feb 3, 2012 10:49 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
When they had a more mobile, puck savvy defense he exploded.
That very well could be the difference this year. In his big months last year (Jan, Feb, March) he had 47, 59, and 49 shots. The past three months he’s had 37, 30, 35. Those extra 40 shots would mean another 4 goals even without a jump in his shooting %. And I think last year’s shooting percentage was driven by having more breakaways. Even though he seems to struggle on those, having lots of them is going to get your % up.
Additionally, you have to think teams are far more aware of him this year. I’m not sure how we could get at whether teams are less aggressive on the their PPs (and in general when he’s on the ice), worried about him taking it the other way, but it seems unlikely that’s not happening.
by afrosupreme on Feb 3, 2012 11:03 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Last year's Grabner...
has been leveraged into defense by paranoia. If they had a stronger D he’d be green lighted more.
In October I thought we’d have 8-10 Grabner(Streit) goals… but what Streit’s return has meant has been that Grabner ahs to go chase down his mistakes because Staios probably means “statue” in greek.

“Steve, any reason you you looked a little slow out there tonight?”
“Back in the old country, they used to call it THE MEDUSA EFFECT”
“Shut up Martin… I was playing this game when you were a glimmer in your daddy’s eye… and who let Katie in here anyway… I’m CHANGING!”
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
by JPinVA on Feb 3, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Where did Staios thingy go?
How do Islander fans spell hope?
T-A-V-A-R-E-S
by BobbyNystromOwnsYou on Feb 3, 2012 1:55 PM EST up reply actions
Why are you looking for thingies?
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Feb 3, 2012 5:35 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
C This team can make the playoffs with divine intervention.
i’m not sure how an album can help us make the playoffs, but i’m on board 100%
These comments crawl up from the depths of the deepest Chasm of Saar
by bob l on Feb 3, 2012 8:58 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Divine Intervention
I was actually talking about…

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
by JPinVA on Feb 3, 2012 9:20 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
oh, i thought you were giving
TMC a little love there, lol
These comments crawl up from the depths of the deepest Chasm of Saar
Slayer never really crosses my mind...
If I wanted to give TMC a “little love” I think I’d have to start here…

I don’t know who the woman in the middle is… but I’m pretty sure a little Photoshop Magic and TMC would have her permanent screen saver.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
by JPinVA on Feb 3, 2012 11:25 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Holy crap
It’s the Amish Mafia
Amateurs practice til they get it right. Professionals practice til they can't get it wrong.
Saul and Kaleb
Bertuzzi looks like a 47th street jeweler I used to know. All he needs is a little more “curl” in his sideburns.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
Lucky, lucky woman.
So lucky.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Feb 4, 2012 3:18 PM EST up reply actions
But can Gigantor move the puck out of the D-Zone quickly? We know he can deliver a punishing check!
Rec’d for pic of one of my favorite after school cartoons growing up!
"This season is a serious misallocation of valuable hockey resources"- Saving Private Tavares
by FireGarthSnow on Feb 3, 2012 1:27 PM EST up reply actions
PAP & Frans
It would be nice to resign these guys, but as others have mentioned Snow wouldn’t be doing his job if he didn’t listen to what the market is offering. Most teams only have a couple of “untouchables”. In my opinion the Isles only untouchables are Tavares and Strome ( I think Nino, Hamonic and Poulin are great, but wouldn’t call them untouchable). Again, personally, I would like to see PAP & Frans stay, but Isles have to listen to offers.
Thanks for the good read JP!
Hamonic is untouchable
kid is a future #2 D for a long long time. By far our best draft pick yet on D from the Snow Era.
by ghalbart on Feb 3, 2012 9:22 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
You'd have to part with like three other assets
including a good roster player, your first rounder and probably Strome or Nino in order to get either one of those guys. Which by proxy makes Hamonic untouchable.
There’s no way to make that happen without seriously jeopardizing organizational depth…and severely compromising the defense.
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Feb 3, 2012 10:22 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
But we need teh defence!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OV doesn’t like to cross the blue line. And Malkin is weird looking. No trade.
by Les Beaver on Feb 3, 2012 10:38 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Malkin
Why is your face sideways?
How do Islander fans spell hope?
T-A-V-A-R-E-S
by BobbyNystromOwnsYou on Feb 3, 2012 12:56 PM EST up reply actions
Hamonic is untouchable
10000000000% agree
We are all Islanders, even if we’re from Jersey!
by Russel Ginart on Feb 3, 2012 12:19 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
If they traded Hammer
They will march in front of the Coli and hang Garth in effigy
How do Islander fans spell hope?
T-A-V-A-R-E-S
by BobbyNystromOwnsYou on Feb 3, 2012 12:55 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Right now today this very moment
If I were the GM for 45 seconds and I was offered Ovi for Hamonic straight up I would say no.
That’s probably the reason my reign as Islander gm only lasted for 45 seconds….
by Bleuchz on Feb 4, 2012 2:58 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
No. You'd be very smart not to touch Ovy right now.
He’s making $9.5mil/yr for another 10yrs and is playing with less value then Grabner recently(not that it’s a total knock). Ovy is barely putting in 30goals/yr recently while being sheltered playing against 3rd line level competition. Any GM would be smart not to touch Ovy at all right now.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
"John Tavares(a top 10 forward in the NHL)"-Neil Greenberg
by OzzyFan on Feb 5, 2012 12:24 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I have a feeling the UNTOUCHABLES are:
Tavares: obvious reasons
Hamonic: The thing they need most and have least is a mobile physical defenseman, why what could you possibly get in return that would justify trading Hammer. (If Mike Milbury is reading this PLEASE contain yourself)
Nino: His egg is starting to crack. Another piece of the puzzle is a solid middle six that offers physical secondary scoring. You don’t want to give up someone with so much upside that is so close (maybe 2 years) from being a very special player that you can retain for 4 years after that rather inexpensively.
Poulin: Unless DP retires they are going to need two relatively inexpensive goaltending options for quite some time. Poulin’s indentured servitude is HUGE. You’d like to think that Montoya starts to get the bulk of starts in February and they can come to conclusive 2-3YR deal… But they do have Nilsson and Koskinen in the bullpen, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they tried to sign Nabby for a year. If Montoya gets traded STAY OFF THE LEDGE… there is logic behind it.
(Lee, Nelson, Strome, Kabanov, Petrov) One of them is going to get “touched”, thus making the remaining pool virtually untouchable.
(Donovan/Mayfield/Pedan) It wouold take a lot for me to give up any of these players. I wouldn’t be surprised if deHaan is shopped in the off season. Especially if he makes it back this year and shows some progress. There are still some GM’s that might think he is a bag of potential… the Islanders are passed that level of need. He probably should have been traded with Jankowski for a second rounder and a backup goaltender with GM potential.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
by JPinVA on Feb 3, 2012 9:41 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Strome is an untouchable IMO
I think out of them all the only touchable one is Petrov. I want to see Lee and Kabanov either on the Island or at Bridgeport next year, so Garth do whatever you can to sign Lee
Why yes, I do have a man crush on Bailey and Martin, and no, I don't care what you think about it
Three years from now...
you’re not going to have them all in the NHL. And by then you’re not getting anything for any of them.
Lee may be the most dangerous to keep because of the loophole option. If he starts school next year you won’t be able to get a bag of pucks for him, and if he opts out you’re SCREWED.
Hopefully Garth figures out what’s in his head, because the other option is he wants to hang a shingle. That’s fine, but the Islanders probably have enough lawyers.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
I gotta think that one of
Donovan, Ness or de Haan is trade-worthy (I refuse to use “touchable” unless we’re talking about laundry detergent) only because they’re somewhat similar types of players, i.e. smallish offensive-minded defensemen. Now, how good they are or how much they sweeten a deal is debatable, as is whether or not Garth makes the right call when the time comes.
"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science
by PGI on Feb 3, 2012 9:56 AM EST up reply actions
People are just throwing this word UNTOUCHABLE around. There is no way Kevin Poulin, Nino Niederreiter, Brock Nelson, etc. are UNTOUCHABLES.
UNTOUCHABLE means not traded in any situation for anyone. Let’s be real here. The only untouchable on this team is Tavares. Any one else is touchable.
DiPietro is untouchable
except for appropriately trained medical staff.
Amateurs practice til they get it right. Professionals practice til they can't get it wrong.
by Torgo on Feb 3, 2012 10:25 AM EST up reply actions 5 recs
This is how you use "untouchable", I think Dre said it best:
Now let me welcome everybody to the wild, wild west
A state that’s untouchable like Elliot Ness
That song also contains my favorite rhyming couplet outside of Shakespeare:
I been in the game for ten years makin rap tunes
Ever since honeys was wearin sassoon
by Les Beaver on Feb 3, 2012 10:41 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
By honeys, does Dre mean
Duguay, Espo and 2 other Rags I can no longer remember
by 4PeatSake on Feb 3, 2012 10:55 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Strome is not untouchable. You wouldn't trade him for Malkin?
As much as we love Strome, the guy has done nothing at the NHL level yet. If you could get a top level forward or top notch D-man for him, you have to listen. If I was certain I could get him to sign an extension, I’d trade Strome in a Suter deal.
Why would you trade a guy
who may be able to put up points like Malkin, who is years younger than Malkin, who is far cheaper than Malkin and under team control, along with other high profile assets.
You would not get Malkin one for one for Strome. Obviously if Ray Shero somehow became an idiot overnight and took a minimal return in that situation, you do it…but you are looking at a deal of Milburian proportions that would seriously hamper the team going forward.
One of the biggest problems this team had was a lack of organizational depth. It is finally being rebuilt so that the team can sustain itself in the future and not have to rely on trades and UFA signings. If this all plays out right, in two to three years, this team may be able to weather a catastrophic injury by calling up its farm club and not missing a beat and make the playoffs.
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Feb 3, 2012 10:29 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Im not sure what kind of message this would send to the team,
but why cant the Isles trade one or both of PA and Frans and resign them in the offseason? Possibly take a cap casualty back from another team so we can have them for next year and then just resign Frans and PA and we gain a player/prospect/ or pick for nothing.
by LaFontaine16 on Feb 3, 2012 12:05 PM EST up reply actions
Who says they'll want to?
I mean yeah we get a huge gain if they somehow agree to that, but wouldn’t you feel a little betrayed by your team? Or, even more frightening, they see how glorious it is to win on a regular basis AND their skills are shown nationally throughout the playoffs, upping their market value?
I’m not saying it’s impossible, but that also isn’t very likely.
by sayvillelax94 on Feb 3, 2012 4:37 PM EST up reply actions
Attendance
Last year, besides the big losing streak, they also had the blizzard that caused the Dec. 26 game to have an attendance of below 3000 and the freak ice storm for the last game against Carolina before the all-star break that caused attendance of below 5000.
I’ve always questioned attendance figures for most sporting events I’ve attended, especially in new stadiums. I think NVMC and the Isles have the most honest attendance I’ve seen. I wonder if they’re actually being honest and using the number of butts in the stands as per the turnstyles or if they’re really saying tickets sold. I wonder this in opposition to the game on Dec. 27 2010 against the Rangers in MSG. They listed a sell out of 18200, but that was the day after the blizzard that saw the Isles report 2900 and the Devils report 4800 (attendees suggest more like 2500). There’s no way anyone from anywhere outside of Manhattan attended the game because all trains weren’t running and most of the roads were awful. I have no doubt they sold all of the tickets, but there’s no way there were 18,200 people in the building that night.
CAR CRASH
The first CAR game in Raleigh this year was posted as 13K+. I’d have bet my lifesize Barbara Eden doll that there were less than 10K there that night. I’m pretty sure that number is based on ticket sales.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
lifesize Barbara Eden doll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!OMG, TMI JP
I guess that better than a Roseann Barr doll!
We are all Islanders, even if we’re from Jersey!
by Russel Ginart on Feb 3, 2012 12:24 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I've never understood the compalint about this
It’s always been obvious that the Islanders and most other teams announce attendance as tickets sold, not number of people through the turnstile.
It’s not like you have to refund someone who didn’t make the game.
"Mark D: the internet's foremost chronicler of Milburian insanity" - Pretty Good Idiot
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
It’s like they’re trying to link attendance to revenue, which is the only reason that they would go based on the number of tickets sold. I think the numbers they give at Islanders games are more accurate than at other places that I have been to.
What is the number of season tickets the Islanders say they have? I’m sure it’s greater than 3000 or 5000, which would indicate they’re really reporting attendance.
by dunnowhat2type on Feb 3, 2012 10:46 AM EST up reply actions
Can only go up when so low.......
But even that 12K average can’t be accurate and still sucks. With all the 2 for 1 ticket deals and discounts, giveaways etc. the REAL attendance for paid tix by customers probably averages about 9-10K. That’s with hosting NYR a few times for sellouts. Brutal
sadder part...
ranger/islander games aren’t guarenteed sellouts anymore.
Until the islanders start challenging the rangers for a playoff spot these games are just glorified by us old farts who remember when they used to mean something.
It’s coming… but it’s not there yet.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
Yeah..........
Weeknights are a ghost town. Free tickets for a can of soup specials. It’s a small market suburban team mentality in a huge urban market plus the losing leads to empty seats.
by 19! on Feb 3, 2012 1:43 PM EST up reply actions
I think another + could be the SH combo of Bailey and Martin
i mean honestly, 2 SH goals in 3 games, thats impressive. It also looks like Bailey is starting to come into his own. He is playing with confidence, which we all know is dangerous, just see 2010 first 10 games Bailey. He might not become that 20-30 goal 70+ points guy we hoped for, but he will end up as a 20 goal 60+ player in due time
Why yes, I do have a man crush on Bailey and Martin, and no, I don't care what you think about it
I definitely missed some pluses...
and that is definitely one of them. The PK outscored the oppostion PP for the month. That’s not bad.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
Just based on the Carolina game tuesday
Our 3rd line WILL BE DANGEROUS, pretty soon we will have 2 lines in THE DANGER ZONE
Why yes, I do have a man crush on Bailey and Martin, and no, I don't care what you think about it
and by danger zone i mean scoring threat every shift
Why yes, I do have a man crush on Bailey and Martin, and no, I don't care what you think about it
I though you meant this

Success was survival and, kid, it still is
by IslesFanInNJ on Feb 3, 2012 10:25 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Looks like DP
went on a fast.
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Feb 3, 2012 10:30 AM EST up reply actions 5 recs
DP + Grover
If they got into the teleporter from THE FLY together, this is what would come out the other end.
For the Sesame Street Challenged… this is GROVER:

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
The theme song
of MY Pensacola Ice Flyers
How do Islander fans spell hope?
T-A-V-A-R-E-S
by BobbyNystromOwnsYou on Feb 3, 2012 10:34 AM EST up reply actions
i was thinking more along the lines of this

Why yes, I do have a man crush on Bailey and Martin, and no, I don't care what you think about it
by DarthDoyle on Feb 3, 2012 1:57 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Martin-Bailey-Rakhshani
I consider the Bailey line (even with Rolston) the #2 offensive line. These guys should be getting the O-Zone starts when JT is in the back of the line. They have to make this work.
The Nielsen line needs to have the most D-Zone starts, but with the best D pair. Nobody transitions the puck from zone to zone better (especially with PAP). Even when Frans loses draws he knows where to be, and I bet he’s like a middle linebacker in that he is the best communicator on the ice when he’s out there. Plus he’s a turnover machine.
Even though Bailey and Martin are productive on the PK, Grabner-Nielsen is the pair I’d rather double on a PK. I expect Rhett(RH) and Kyle(RH) to mix in on the PK as well. Maybe Rhett/Bailey and Martin/Kyle.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
They should get more O zone starts
and I’d have to check, but I feel like Bailey has gotten worse zone starts than Frans this year. That’s obviously cumulative, so I don’t know what the breakdown has been throughout the season. It could be the case that once the line changes happened, things changed…
I wonder if there’s a way to look at that in season “chunks” based on when those changes happened? Paging Garik…
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
I guess what you’re ultimately looking for is something Gabe’s just introduced this week. See here for an example (Josh Bailey last season), go here to select other players. Unfortunately, this is available only for completed seasons.
But you can always use Vic’s scripts if you want to check certain chunks of games of the current season. Here’s the zonestart summary for the Islanders this season and as always just play around with the game numbers (e.g. put first=20474 for data from game 30, i.e. the last 20 games) to get the data for the respective stretch.
Haven’t run a lot of numbers, but it looks like Bailey was used very similarly to Nielsen in the first quarter of the season, but has got more offensive zone starts since.
by BenHasna on Feb 3, 2012 2:14 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Thanks!
Will check this out!
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
So far this season:
Bailey: 48.1% o-zone starts(6th most among regular starters)
Nielsen: 45.4% o-zone starts (8th among regular starters)
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
"John Tavares(a top 10 forward in the NHL)"-Neil Greenberg
When was the last time the Bailey-Martin line scored
Lighthouse Hockey. Where Islanders fans come to panic with punctuation.
by DP'sknee(andhipandflubugandotherknee) on Feb 3, 2012 10:49 AM EST up reply actions
Close
Against Anaheim at the beginning of January.
Lighthouse Hockey. Where Islanders fans come to panic with punctuation.
by DP'sknee(andhipandflubugandotherknee) on Feb 3, 2012 11:00 AM EST up reply actions
agree here....
Bailey needs to get more offensive zone opportunities. Hopefully Rakshani can help with the offense part on his line. I love Martin, but hes not a playmaker or a finisher. That line needs someone else to compliment baileys playmaking and martins grinding. Hopefully Rhett can be that guy for now.
by LaFontaine16 on Feb 3, 2012 12:07 PM EST up reply actions
As a huge Martin fan...
I agree. I think Martin should get top 9 opportunities as they present themselves with injuries and other circumstances. But Ullstrom is the guy I want to see on that line.
To be honest, I’d like to see Ullstrom-Bailey-PAP, and Grabner-Nielsen-Rhett fhrough the remainder of the season.
Martin-(Pandolfo, Colliton, Reasoner)-Nino is fine until somebody starts putting in goals somewhere.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
Martins a tough case because....
i feel he’s better and deserves more than 4th line minutes, but not quite there yet to receive a 3rd line role, especially on a team that is starving for goals outside its top line. I would also like to see him standing in front of the net on the PP one day. He had a very brief stint in that role and i thought he handled it well.
It's not a demotion of a player...
it’s a refefinition of a line.
This team has had a suckfest of a fourth line for years. We think of it as the cockroaches that come running out when you kick the dumpster. What it becomes with better players is the ability to roll four balance lines.
A playoff team should be able to double shift a hot player with two components of the fourth line to create a line that is as good as their second line. They should be able to rely on components of that line for special teams. That line should take the nuetral zone face offs and drain the other teams better lines. They should be able to create offense with a solid forecheck… and FINISH CHECKS.
Martin-Reasoner-Rhett will be the best fourth line they’d had in a decade. Sprinklle in a little Haley when needed and you have the fourth line of a playoff team.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
i liked our 4th line when steve webb was on it......
cant remember who the other two were though lol. Not like it mattered.
....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7f0RTedfSQ
How do Islander fans spell hope?
T-A-V-A-R-E-S
by BobbyNystromOwnsYou on Feb 3, 2012 1:56 PM EST up reply actions
When steve webb...
is the most memorable player on any line of an NHL team, that team isn’t going very far.
Haley > Webb.. and Haley is where he should be right now.
There’s no way you can’t love Webb20, but he wasn’t the game changer some make him out to be.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
Lets not discount what he did in that series.....
He changed the whole complexion of that series. When the other teams entire building is chanting that you suck, you have done your job. Also not to discredit the numerous penalties he drew by his physical, but clean play. He wasnt ideal for an 82 game season, but should never be discredited for what he did in that series.
So they would have WON...
a playoff series if it wasn’t for Steve Webb. That’s a little harsh, don’t you think..
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
Ehh
His play was clean pre-lockout, but post-lockout (especially now) might be a different story.
by sayvillelax94 on Feb 3, 2012 4:40 PM EST up reply actions
Hrm
Pretty confident he didn’t end any careers which seems to be what the post-lock out way of doing things now.
Clean or not he didn’t hit with intent to injure.
by Bleuchz on Feb 4, 2012 3:09 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Oh I'm not saying he intended to injure anyone
And he didn’t cause any major injuries that I’m aware of. I just think the Shanaban may have come down hard on him.
by sayvillelax94 on Feb 4, 2012 1:24 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed with most - a few comments:
One must wonder how long it takes to give up on an older player who is not performing at all. Maybe they think they are being prudent by not being hasty, but there is such a thing as being too prudent and slow to react.
As for Grabner, maybe a week off with some individual coaching and practice might help. He has great speed and great stick use when it comes to forechecking and PK, but can’t seem to put the two together well enough to score breakaway goals this year. It could be a psychological thing or just a need for more focused practice. If he could solve his problem, he would be an incredible asset.
And not to forget:
+ P.A. Parenteau!
He sets up plays, he’s unselfish, and he scores goals. At times he seems to be everywhere, not giving up on situations.
- Officiating!
And not just against the Islanders. Sloppy, inconsistent refs all over the NHL. Not to mention the Kings-Jackets fiasco. Someone really needs to clean this up before serious-minded fans start to lose patience.
It is Diduck.
Grabner
As for Grabner, maybe a week off with some individual coaching and practice might help.
The only reason I gave Grabs a minus is because the team is desperate for secondary scoring and he has squandered the most opportunities. Other than that, Grabner is definitely holding his head above water as a NYI. He is earning his pay just by his defensive play. The fact that he is minus infinity is a testimony to how bad the defense can be. I guess we could look at CORSI and stuff like that, but Grabs always seems to have his motor running. There will be a stretch when he pots 50% of his breakaways and he will be over-plused…and back on the 30G pace.
As far as PAP and the officials I couldn’t agree more… but I couldn’t make the post a monthly report card. That’s what the comments are for.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
#40 last vs this year
nothing new from last year aside from cutting the overall # of chances down…
he was between 1/3 and 1/4 on his overall chances last year, and is probably close to the same this year, but he’s creating only 5/8ths of the chances…
by my count, that’s…
3 fractions…
which isn’t a lot, so, there ya go, all explained :-)
These comments crawl up from the depths of the deepest Chasm of Saar
If you are calling "breakaways" "chances"....
then id have to say grabner has gotten his fair share this season. The difference to me is he is virtually not finishing on any of them.
by LaFontaine16 on Feb 3, 2012 12:09 PM EST up reply actions
Couple of things
Man, basically a 30% jump in attendance? Crazy. You have to think that if they were winning more often, people would come back. There’s always the question of reduced ticket prices and ridiculous promotions that help fill the place up too. If playing slightly sub-.500 hockey can get you 75% attendance, I would have to assume a playoff (for 6th to 8th seed) race (throughout a full season) could get that number up to around 14K.
Also, JT is only 21 JP! Sept 1990 b-day. I just love pointing out how young he is considering how good he is at this age. Really, he’s been above a PPG every month except one (where he unfortunately slumped hard). If he has one bad month, one outstanding month and 5 months of consistent PPG production over the rest of his career, this team will be in great shape.
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Feb 3, 2012 9:44 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Islander Blackjack
I hit on a 12 and just assumed I’d bust. In my head he started at 19 and this is his 3rd year… this is why you don’t take the SATs at 2:AM.
Young, talented and locked up. More needs to go into protecting him… maybe Kyle should spend a few weeks with Trevor this summer.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
Amen on KO getting his Gillies on
I’d prefer he hang with Lucic a bit, but I’d settle for that. I know Looch is an ass, but I’d love KO if he was an ass protecting JT.
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Feb 3, 2012 10:15 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
The one thing we don't need...
is KO getting too close to Lucic. I’d love for him to be Lucic, but that ain’t happnin’. He’d need a year with Gillies to protect JT from Kerbe on Saturday night.
Man… I just pictured Okposo v Lucic in a youtube video… 14 minutes… 5 mins of praying over the body… 8 minutes of Martin trying to get at Lucic…
No… we definitely don’t want that. Just like we wanted Comeau to be tougher… when he finally dropped the gloves I thought, “that’s great… but don’t ever do that against somebody who can fight…”
Bruno v White anybody? ISLANDER FACE!
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
Oh, no, not fighting Lucic
just modeling his game that way…good lord no. They’d need to pick KO up with a shovel and mop.
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
Jimmy Howard out two weeks with a broken pinky
And Conklin hasn’t done well backing up. Do you think they’re looking to acquire Nabby again?
UVa Student. Twitter: @ericdavidmorris
They called up Joey Mac
Not sure that is going to be an ongoing injury problem, so probably not looking to pluck a goaltender. They are in a comfortable playoff position anyway.
I could see if it was a groin or a knee or something likely to flare up, but this is something that when it’s healed, he’s fine. I thnk at most you’re looking at him missing 4-6 games. Also, if their schedule looks weak coming up, that’s another strike against separating from an asset to get a backup goalie.
It is a little dangerous for them on a whole though because their backups have been pretty terrible. If Howard does get hurt for any length of time, they will probably have problems.
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
Would you rather...
go into April with JMac, or Nabby. Remember that the front doors close in February, and they have to go thru the drive thru in March. That didn’t work out so well last year.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
by JPinVA on Feb 3, 2012 10:24 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I hear you
I’m basically just saying that this is a problem for Detroit anyway…not that Howard’s pinky necessarily exacerbates that need.
If they are looking, they were probably already looking. This injury and their standing in the league right now probably won’t play much into their decision.
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
Nabby Packing?
Nabby and a player to be named later for Brandon Smith. The PTBNL will be Calvin when he gets off the DL.
Smith is two years closer to the NHL. deHaan may have a slightly higher “upside” but he really hasn’t shown it. Detroit can afford to wait for it… and Nabby is a target.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
The best case
is to hang onto Nabby until a day or two before the deadline.
Best Case: two or more teams have an interest and spark a minor bidding war, increasing our return (above avg prospect or 2nd rd pick)
Probable Case: nothing of note happens and his value remains the same (middling prospect or 3rd rd pick)
Worst case: he gets hurt and we get nothing.
Amateurs practice til they get it right. Professionals practice til they can't get it wrong.
I felt that the Poulin call-up and start on Tuesday
was a way for Garth to light a fire under any Nabby pursuers (pursuitors?). If you’re a GM and have interest in Nabby, then you see he’s not starting in favor of a call-up, you’d think Garth was close to dealing him….or not
Nabby in net tonight
Sadly, Jimmy Howard’s finger is not broken enough. Out only two game but to be reevaluated.
Lighthouse Hockey. Where Islanders fans come to panic with punctuation.
by DP'sknee(andhipandflubugandotherknee) on Feb 3, 2012 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
Honestly
I’d fear trading with Detroit. They are such good talent evaluators I have a hard time believing we wouldn’t get fleeced.
Even detroit
waived tim taylor.
Nobody’s perfect.
Gigantor...BIGGER THAT BIG...
…but small sample size. If the trend continues I’ll give the big fella a plus in February.
Right now 2012 Gigantor = 2011 Milan Jurcina..
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
It's not that I don't like Montoya
But Nabokov is simply a better goalie. Even if they both play well, If we think Poulin is almost there, he is a better option to lock up for 2 years if we can. Perfect to have an experienced true NHL veteran to help the transition.
I also think that PAP is more critical to lock up than Frans. Sure, I would love to have them both, but if we, for some nutty reason, can only have one, a scoring winger who is at worst a 2nd liner is more valuable than a 3rd line checking center. If we needed one last piece to win the cup, maybe Frans is it, but I don’t think you build around those guys. He is regressing this season with 2nd line minutes and responsibilities, and we can’t even blame Rolston for that.
BTW, nice job on the post JP.
ROLSTON: That's where you're wrong.
All evil points to Brian Rolston.
Logic: If BR was more productive, Josh Bailey would be coming out of the question mark he’s been wrapped in for 3+ years. If that happens maybe Comeau is still around… or Martin is near double digits… and they are the clear second offensive line. That puts the Nielsen line right where I want them… creating offense against the oppositions’ top line.
If I’m correct we’re going to see that in February.
Really tough call on either PAP or Nielsen. Both have their “potential” replacements in the system. Nielsen has Casey nipping at his role, and there are a few guys that would love PAP’s RW job..Strome, Nino, kabanov?
But when will they be ready, and will any of them be as good as the mature players they’d be replacing.
The question for either is what you get back in retrurn if you trade them. If they go, you have to get value… that’s the key.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
by JPinVA on Feb 3, 2012 11:39 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Just when I thought it was safe
to let Rolston off the hook for one second, logic seems to have snared him right back on the line. I actually thought he would be a useful player this year. He was slow enough as a Devil, but still managed to get some good shots, including from the point on the pp. Even that has appeared to have evaporated.
Yeah... sorry about that.
to me there are two reasons we (ISLANDER FANS) are not excited about the playoff race right now.
1 (THE BIGGEST) is Garth Snow’s failure to solidify the defensive corps. He may not have had many options, but the return of the walking wounded (Streit, Macdonald, Eaton and Mottau) should have been cause to at least sign Hillen to a one-way. If they were worried about roster room they could have catipulted Mottau (which is where they are now).
2. The Brian Rolston deal. Rolston(1YR) for Hunter(2YRS) seemed (to some) like a trade that helped both clubs. Well.. for a team on a budget this move was ridiculously hindering. They might have needed it to get to the salary cap floor… but that is even more pathetin because they dumped $2.5M as soon as they could. Rolston has done absolutely nothing but confuse an already entangled situation. Going into the season I think we all thought that they needed a consistent RW for Comeau and Bailey… what they brought in was a LW that completely twisted teh tomato. So instead of having Ullstrom-Bailey-Comeau, Comeau-Bailey-(Hunter/Rhett/Strome/Nino) we have Bailey on the carousel again… but alone. No continuity at all.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
The thing about Franzie that is overlooked
is he’s almost automatic in getting us a Bettman point and when we’re fighting for a 7- or 8-seed, his backhands could be worth 5 pts in the standings over a full season
TRUE, bakhand of Judgement can get us SO points.
So did Tambellini and RSH, but they are no longer here. Franzie, is still here but I would not call him untouchable.
We are all Islanders, even if we’re from Jersey!
by Russel Ginart on Feb 3, 2012 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
we could always use short term contracts on these guys and re-evaluate next year....
or the year after for that matter. Of course, this is if these guys are willing to accept shorter term deals. They are both at the age where they should want to cash out, but we will have the cap space to give them more money on shorter term deals if they would choose to go that route.
If we were able to go the short term route we could wind up using them as traid bait to plug in some final more peices or simply keep them if the younger guys arent panning out as we hoped.
All wishful insight though that may or may not be a practical situation.
The value of wanting to be here
Is hard to put a price on. We learned this the hard way through the Muller years. Perhaps this attitude will change some day (who wouldn’t want to have JT to pump up your stats?) but until proven otherwise, I think this is a big factor. Keeping our own free agents is a big deal in a world where we can’t import them. If Frans and P.A. like it here, it’d be silly to give up on them for an unknown — with all the obvious caveats about a steal of a trade (which ain’t happening). And I know it’s been said before, but if we trade Frans, how are we going to replace him?
I think a lot of people miss this point...
And I know it’s been said before, but if we trade Frans, how are we going to replace him?
Most likely, if Snow has traded either guy he’s failed to sign him before the deadline. The team isn’t goin gto make the playoffs without some backline help. If you tade either it’s a forced opportunity to fill their roles with their “potential” replacements (see above) for a few months.
The most important part of this is that you have just as much of a chance to sign them on 7/1/12 with them on the roster on 6/30 or if they are on another roster on that date.
This is a deep draft, so unless you can sign them both before the deadline I’d hang a second rounder price tag on both of them. If you could work two first rounders out of this draft you’d probably be set for a while after you got rolling.
The worst that can happen is that they sign elsewehre… which was going to happen anyway.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
by JPinVA on Feb 3, 2012 1:19 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
yea thats my main point in trading Fransy and PA......
they would want to and have to resign with us during free agency. This isnt practical because the market can really drive up their prices and verbal agreements or promises is basically just bad business. I just feel Parenteau and Nielsen could be the most coveted players out there for playoff teams looking to make a run. They are both very versatile, valuable and (the key word) cheap players who can easily be plugged anywhere into a teams lineup.
Problem is, like i said, a verbal agreement of a player wanting to come back and play here is probably just too risky from an Isles standpoint at this point in time. Would be a nice scenario though.
are you just speculating?
Because you got me excited there for a minute, but I couldn’t find any news on the subject.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
A Mac is Back?
This brings up a point I’m interested in: if this is “good” A Mac, is he really a top-4 D-man?
“Making good decisions” doesn’t qualify in my book – that is a prerequisite for ANY NHL defenseman.
I think A Mac is a #5 d-man on a good team – a smart, small, injury-prone player with little pizzazz or physicality that can do the elusive “move the puck” thing decently well.
I think A Mac is a case – like Frans Nielsen – of being underrated for a while and then because he’s underratted we fans tend to overcompensate with praise and expectations.
Just sayin’.
AMAC is a top 4 ...
On a budget team. Most likely he is on the third pair when this team becomes a consistent playoff team. Hamonic drives most of the offense and physicality on that pairing, but their numbers are similar. You’d think that a top pairing woould bring what Streit brought in his first two years… while carrying Bruno.
This, more than anything is why I say that the defense has to be fixed first. There are literally five players playing over the level that they should be tasked with. Possibly, the only player that is under used is Streit, and that’s because they can’t find a partner that with the defensive awareness to keep him a plus player.
Hamonic, s/b second pairing
MacDonald, s/b third pairing.
Streit, s/b first pair
Staios, s/b retired/7th defender.
Jurcina, s/b 3rd pair
Mottau, s/b AHL… when he played his 11th game this year he was over/mis-used.
Eaton, s/b 3rd pair (where he should be)
Reese, 7th defender (where he should be)
dehaan, AHL (where he should be)
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
Amac
in the most recent stretch of games is leading the team in TOI. You have to wonder if it’s any coincidence that since Streit/Staios has been cut down and Ham/Amac up that the team has started to look better throughout the season. Obviously they don’t have the gaudy numbers, but that pairing is eating up significant ice time despite being young and often (in Amac’s case), injured.
The thing with Amac is, I think he can slot in on any pairing and either make it better or hold serve. He adapts his game well to what is needed by the coaching staff. (Like Hamonic). Last year when they needed offense, they provided offense…this year, when they need them to be a shut down D pair, they’re doing that. You really can’t put a judgement on a player that is doing exactly what is asked/needed by the coaching staff (more aimed at Zen here).
Of course you can always find a better player to fit into a slot, but let’s face facts here, the guy is playing 23:43 and rising (28th NHL) minutes a night, against the oppositions toughest, is 8th in the league in blocked shots despite at least 6 games in hand on everyone in front of him after coming off hip surgery…for 550K. He is tied for 12th fewest penalty minutes on the team (14) with the only regular defenseman behind him being Eaton with 6 (with 8 minutes less TOI per game)… And he is starting to look much better.
You can’t lose sight of what you have in a guy just because the rest of the guys around him stink. I’ll bet Amac would look a crapload better if you had a Suter and/or a Girardi sprinkled somewhere else throughout the entirety of the defense. He and Hammer do a crap ton of heavy lifting.
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Feb 4, 2012 10:56 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Some great points there
And you have me thinking about it now. I imagine part of it is we have this expectation of AMac as a puck mover and contributor on offense. He seems to be struggling a little with that this year, probably because his wheels aren’t 100%, but at the same time seems to have progress a lot in our own end.
We definitely give Hamonic the lion’s share of credit for moving into the top D line, but AMac probably deserves just as much.
Considering
he is a 25 year old 6th round pick who was in the ECHL in ‘07/’08 and like 5th or 6th on BPT’s depth chart in ‘09/’10, can you really complain about his play or trajectory given his assignments?
Realistically, Hamonic is a bit off of his scoring pace too and has 1/3 of the goals Amac has (1). I mean, what are we blaming that on exactly?
I think the thing is, both Ham and Amac CAN be offensive…it’s just that ther remainder of the roster CAN’T be defensive. It’s an allocation of resources that stinks for their numbers, but is good for the team. And really, the fact that they haven’t deviated much from the gameplan and gotten burnt more often is testament enough to the quality of players they are.
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
Like Ben noted below
if Amac is our 5th or 6th defenseman, I would expect that our goalie wins the Vezina (it could probably be Toskala), and that the team wins the cup.
Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
I think we've nested in the lowest of trees
Amac is doing a great job of being defensively responsible. But other teams aren’t gameplanning around him. that’s when the game changes.
When Steit was in top form he was making teams think of where he was at all times… on the shittiest of teams. That’s a first pair defenseman.
We’re not going to get a denis potvin, but you do need somebody who drives the play like that to be offensively successful in “today’s NHL”. Streit was what made us interesting before Hamonic. Hammy just doesn’t have the chops for that. He and AMAC, can stifle an offense, but they can’t make their own explosive.
Again, I’m not knocking Amac at all, but if he was RH he might be the kind of wind that makes Streit fly again. I only bring the RH thing up because that seems to be the most important trait when picking a partner for Streit. Bruno(?), Staios(?), Jurcina(?).. RH is the only thing I can see that links the three.
If it wasn’t for the whole LH thing I would think that Wishart would be the perfect mate for Streit. But that is from last year’s assessment… Maybe Reese needs to get more time with him… but do you really want reese playing >20MINS?
And then there’s this:
Steit-Hamonic
Macdonald-Wishart
donovan-Jurcina
(eaton/reese/katic/deHaan)
these are things you need to try when you’re not generating offense and your team is 10 points out of a playoff spot. Basically so you’re not scratching your head about RFA’s and your grocery list going into July.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
I'm goin gto miss the drop of the puck...
can somebody put the big guy on the game thread?
Thanks!
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
past January's
Would have been nice to add some points early in the month against the Ducks and Coyotes. Not the start out West that they needed.
With a total of 47 points at the end of January, Isles are below their 05/06 season points when Steve Sterling was fired and it was announced MM would be leaving at the end of the season.
At least, Capuano improved over last year’s record, but still below Ted Nolan‘s pace in 06/07 & 07/08 and GoGoGordo’s 09/10 season.
just a general sentiment
from reading through this and a few other recent threads. I feel sometimes we’re focused on the D a bit too much, always trying to explain the outcome of every little play with something related to the D. As a consequence, the overall contribution of (certain parts of) the D or the talent level might be understated a bit – just like the effects of the D on the play as a whole might be overstated.
Don’t get me wrong, I miss Jack Hillen, too, and there’s no way I like what Eaton’s brought to the team. And, ironically, I probably even rate Staios lower than many others. So, clearly, there is lots of room for improvement and upgrading the D should always be an important target, but yeah, some thoughts behind a few comments don’t really work for me because they’re maybe based on misperceptions of the talent level of the D around the league or on this team.
Grabner’s amount of breakaways and +/-:
Grabner’s played 77 percent of his 5-on-5 TOI with Hamonic or Streit combined and therefore roughly 23 percent with the third pairing. I know Streit’s partner’s been a weak spot sometimes and Streit’s not always been brilliant with his passes, either, but still, Grabner’s indeed been playing with legit puck-moving top-4 NHL D most of this season. Again, there is room for improvement, but neither next year nor anywhere I think in this league in the next 10 years will Grabner’s breakaway chances just double automatically because finally a so much more legit NHL D will be behind him…
The same for +/-. Every forward in this league plays about 20 percent of his shifts with a couple of vulnerable D, that’s just what the 3rd pairing really is all about on many, many teams, even the recent Cup winning teams. Other factors have been the main drivers of Grabner’s +/-.
bottom 6/9 forwards’ performances:
Besides Grabner and his line, also the 3rd and 4th lines have played a lot with Streit or Hamonic, mostly between about 65 and 70 percent of the total 5-on-5 TOI. An alleged D upgrade next year or later in their careers might of course help them a little bit, but they won’t magically turn into much better players in front of a different D and again other factors will drive their progress.
A-Mac top 4? Streit minus:
If Streit’s getting a minus for this month I don’t know who around the league would have got a plus. And if A-Mac wasn’t a top-4 D I think he’d be the best #5 in the league. The 3rd pairings are really vulnerable all around the league, again, just look at the recent Cup winning teams even. As said, I think due to certain struggles of the D and this whole focus on the D generally we’ve been too tough on particularly the good defenders. JT’s line’s been one of the best around the league and although their strength is indeed down low I don’t see how they could be such a dominant possession line with a weak D behind them.
Again, I’m not at all trying to imply the D’s been great or even good enough. That’s clearly not been the case. And some of my examples here or potential others might be debateable because someone will maybe assess something regarding the talent level or a certain thought a little differently. That’s perfectly fine. But my point is mainly that it’s not nearly all been about the D with this team this season.
by BenHasna on Feb 3, 2012 7:07 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Let me try to defend some of this...
Don’t get me wrong, I miss Jack Hillen, too, and there’s no way I like what Eaton’s brought to the team.
Obviously posted before OT last night. I get your point. But this is a team of band aids and travis hamonic. It’s unfortunate that the timing on Streit was poor. The 2008-09 or 2009-10 Streit with the 2012-13 Hamonic would have been awesome. It would be nice if they had the luxury to make Donovan-Hamonic the first pair for the rest of the year, but Donovan isn’t ready for that, and there is no staging area because Hamonic isn’t in the AHL, and there’s nobody at his level in the organization.
The fact that their goals against has improved is mostly due to the defensive play of the forwards and the shifting of defensive philosophies. This team, as a group, does not drive the offense except when the tavares line is on the ice. They are just too timid… and they have to be, because they have to compress to help even their top pair defend.
Amac is good… but he’s following up a 27 assist year with one that he will likely finish with single digits in that category… with top pair minutes. Is that a top four defenseman? If you’re his agent sell me on $7M over 3 years. That’s what Brent Sopel is making. The 5th? defender on the 2009-10 SC champs. He’s not physical, and if not for the really nice fit between him and Hamonic he might be floating around the league in obscurity. If you think you’re duncan Keith you don’t sign for $550K for four years. I just hope that travis pays his rent or something like that. If they increase their budget to a reasonable $55M they could(If players would join the team) legitimately get a partner for hamonic, and one for Streit (eventually Donovan/deHaan) and Macdonald is a third pair defenseman. And yeah… he might be one of the better one’s in the league. WIN.
Mark Streit had four EV assists in january. You’re correct that maybe my assessment is a little unfair, but I expect Mark Streit to drive play. No defenseman has done that, not even the almighty Hamonic, though he tries. he did it a little more in January, and their record shows it… but there is definitely something missing from the Gordon/Streit. Maybe Capuano has muted that in him… maybe his injury has cost him some aggressiveness. There is just something missing 5-on-5, and I really hope it’s not Bruno, because he’s not getting that back.
As far as grabner goes I tried to explain the minus twice in this post. I definitely do not have a problem with Michael Grabner. The fact that he hasn’t had an explosive month yet is (IMHO) due to a few factors that are beyond his control. LUCK (ha.. I never thought I’d be saying that), he has been absolutely stoned and the diversity of roles. FNGO never really got “going” this year. It might be a little bit of each of the three seeking new levels. Kyle has really found a home up top with tavares. frans has not delivered offensively… I’m not even sure i like him on the PP… and Grabner seems to be delivering more defensively than offensively (definitely a good thing). Since PAP replaced Kyle he seems to be more productive when he gets stuck on line changes… and Grabs time with bailey was just a mess. Bailey has had the COZO to contend with, then the broken puck shooting machine and then they asked him to be the guy who launches the rocket.
I have a feeling grabner will flourish offensively when the line takes on more of a defensive role and they get Rhett or Nino on the RW full time. Bailey with Ullstrom and PAP might be the answer. that would give them a fourth line of martin-Reasoner/Pandolfo-(Nino/Rhett). And that’s where they start next year.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
by JPinVA on Feb 4, 2012 5:25 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Eaton, wow!
The fact that their goals against has improved is mostly due to the defensive play of the forwards and the shifting of defensive philosophies.
This is probably right for large parts. But I think the reverse needs to be taken into account, as well. There surely were some horrible gaffes by the D early on, but the fact that they struggled as a team defensively also had quite a bit to do with the defensive work of the forwards and especially their whole approach with that very, very passive setup in the neutral zone. That put the D in tough situations quite often. And well, that’s one point I was trying to make – we’re blaming the D for some stuff they couldn’t really do much about and now we’re crediting the forwards with all the progress and are kind of frustrated the D still sucks, although the D overall just didn’t have the same kind of room for improvement as other aspects of the game.
AMac
Well, 12 of A-Mac’s 23 assists last season were on the PP. He played over 3 minutes per game on the PP and of course mostly with JT & Co. due to Streit being out. This season, he’s getting the final 30 seconds of the PP’s, mostly with the second unit and you simply can’t expect him to rack up assists there at all. True, at EV you’d expect a little more there, but they’ve only been shooting at 5.96% when he was on – opposed to 9.71% last year. If you adjust for the EV shooting and the PP opportunities I think he’s close to last year’s pace.
But generally, and this is quite important for Streit, too, I think we should be very careful in terms of evaluating the D of this team based on assists. They’re just playing systems and having forward personnel that is not at all geared to the D getting many assists. I watched a game of the Gordon era a month ago (against Detroit) and it’s so remarkable how much more passive the D are at the opposing blueline now. When you go back to the games a couple of seasons ago you see so many forwards doing a (reverse) COZO and the D taking over the puck and storming down low along the boards. You almost never see this now. And I’m sure you like it because it does indeed reduce the odd-man rushes against. But on the other hand it means the D can only rack up points if they’re getting the puck towards the net and somebody will do something with it there and that’s just not happening very often. Also, it means the opposition has an easier time clearing the puck out of the zone and I think except for JT’s line, which does everything down low anyway, I think that’s been a bit of a problem for the other lines. Also their progress in terms of getting shots is driven mostly by JT – the other lines are actually putting up slightly disappointing and worse numbers compared to previous seasons there. Clearly, to get the D involved a little differently would be a higher-risk strategy, but I think it would enable some of the other lines to get a little more extended zone time and as a consequence more secondary scoring, more points for the D. But yeah, some would like it, some not, but the key is really that it is difficult I think for the D to rack up points on this team.
And Sopel, well, he’s perhaps overpaid, but anyway a much inferior player compared to A-Mac in my opinion, just like McQuaid, Eaton or Lebda who were the other recent #5’s on the Cup winning teams. I’d obviously love if A-Mac was the Isles’ #5 because that would mean they have a truly terrific D indeed.
Streit
As said, I think their game’s changed from two years ago and Streit’s numbers might suffer a bit, but I think he can still be an effective defenseman and in my opinion has proven that over the last two months or so. It’s quite remarkable, he was getting more and more props for his progress until the Toronto game where he put the puck around Nabby and into the own net and it’s been almost exclusively “oh he’s declining” since. Maybe it was a mistake, but it was mostly a freak play I’d say and even if it was a mistake, it was just one play. Sure, he’s made other bad decisions, but really, he was driving play this past month. The shots on goal (not Corsi total, just the shots on net) were 144-99 in the Isles’ favour when Streit was on in January. I don’t think too many defenders around the league had better numbers there and it’s just very unfortunate his +/- has got even worse lately (PDO was 93.5%). I know people will say, “yeah the numbers whatever, I saw the bad decisions and stuff”. Well, I saw some, too, and sometimes I like assessing the players based on what I see very much, but the general assessment of Streit over the last two months in my opinion is a classic case where single, sometimes freakish events and underlying expectations (“Streit never made mistakes in his prime”) mask the true story.
Grabner
Running out of time here, but yeah, my point was similar. I don’t disagree at all with your assessment of Grabner, but wanted to point out, just like you do here, that some other factors have hurt him a little this season and my point just was that the D might have been one of the least important ones and wrongly is cited too often in his context.
By the way, we’ll get to discuss this in detail at some point I guess, I’ve really liked your recent assessments of the bottom-6 forwards, very accurate I think when it comes to the potential, current contribution and especially relative strength of the respective guys. But I think sometimes you might overestimate the absolute strength and therefore the possible impact of certain guys a little. Ullstrom-Bailey-Martin might be a tad more productive than Rolston-Bailey-Martin or Rhett-Reasoner-Nino might be a bit better than Wallace-Pandolfo-Nino, but the margins are really low there and in my opinion they’d really need a guy like PA or Bergenheim to help out on such lines in order to improve the team as a whole noticeably.
by BenHasna on Feb 4, 2012 7:53 AM EST up reply actions 4 recs
Thanks...
for taking the time.
I consistently complained about the Gordon system where defenders (even Witt) were found below the circles in the o-zone way too often, and putting more pressure on the forwards to cover for odd man rushes. So you are correct, I definitley like this way better… it seems to be a comprimise of Gordon’s defensive aggressiveness and Nolan’s utter passive D. It would have been fun to see if they were given the talent they needed to execute this system… would they both trend towards the middle?
You are also correct about filtering out the opposing view when it comes to making a point. Streit is a good example of this. I did, however, point out how good he was on the PP, and when I’ve had a chance to watch the whole sheet (live) it just appears that he is regressing towards that Gordon agressive style of play 5-on-5. Even on the forecheck he will be more aggressive where the other pairs are more successful by being passive in the nuetral zone. My live observations are a small sample though.
The biggerst part of all this is that guys like AMAC may be the 5th defenseman in two years… and I’m not knocking Amac there. I agree.. when he is playing those minutes the team will have one of the better corps in the league… The talent in the system isn’t going to get them there though, they need to add top defenders already in the 25-30 Year old group.
No matter how you slice it, I think the next two months will be better than last year’s run to spring. They have better (and more mature) hockey players driving the action. I can’t even remember the last time they had a WWF fight or have put themselves out of a game by spending 10-14 minutes in the box. If goaltending holds up, and they get some help from BPT (Ullstrom, Wishart) they can make it a very interesting two months.
I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA
by JPinVA on Feb 4, 2012 12:39 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs

by 











































