Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Sabres 2, Islanders 1: When Flawed Teams Meet

Sure, just 81 seconds in, but at least it wasn't the first shot, amiright?

At this point it's bigger news when the Islanders don't allow an early goal or don't get shutout, so tonight they managed the former and came five minutes short of pulling off the latter.

The Islanders were flopping all over the zone early, allowing Tyler Meyers to poke in the final rebound just 1:21 into the game. A few hours or 53 minutes of game time later, Frans Nielsen ripped a short-side slapshot past Ryan Miller to halve a 2-0 Sabres lead that was rarely contested through a very sleepy contest that finished 2-1.

GS | ES | H2H | Shifts | Corsi | Zones | Recaps: NHL | Isles | SBN

The Sabres' insurance goal -- insurance they would ultimately need -- was quite the cluster. Matt Martin was down hurt in the Sabres zone and Brian Rolston was drifting behind the Buffalo net to retrieve a loose stick as the Sabres rushed up ice 5-on-3. Andrew MacDonald sprawled to cut one passing lane, Aaron Ness took the other side and Josh Bailey, without any help from his wingers, still drifted down too low without covering anyone. [Full overhead video here.]

The uncovered Thomas Vanek took a nice pass from Derek Roy behind the net and scored the goal that would prove to be the difference.

Star-divide

The Islanders had a few choice opportunities to pull back within one goal much earlier, but Brian Rolston was stopped on two breakaways -- sprung on a nice stretch pass by Mark Streit on one of them -- Josh Bailey couldn't convert the rebound on one of them, and Michael Grabner settled a puck at point blank range only to go all Kyle Okposo and ring the post.

Miller did a nice job stopping Matt Moulson on the doorstep as time wound down.

Game Highlights

Game Notes

* Josh Bailey left the game with back spasms midway through the second period, leading to a frequent mix of odd line combinations and some poor changes the rest of the way. Don't know if that fell on Doug Weight in his game filling in for flu-ridden Jack Capuano, but it must've made his head coaching debut more interesting than he'd have liked.

To be clear, the Sabres' second goal came on a bad change, but it wasn't anything resulting from Bailey's injury. Bailey was in fact the lone forward back in the zone on that play and he didn't handle the result that well. Rather, Martin drifted off -- we'll give him the benefit of the doubt after being prone and momentarily hurt -- leaving the Isles no chance to have another forward get back to work against the rush. The stat sheet gives Martin's sub Nino Niederreiter a minus on that play, but the hockey gods frown upon this injustice.

* Late in the second period, Mike Weber stepped up in the neutral zone to lay out Jay Pandolfo while Pandolfo received a suicide pass. Matt Martin stepped up from there to challenge Weber to an uneventful fight. No instigator called -- the NHL works in mysterious ways -- and fortunately Pandolfo would return to action.

* At the end of the first period, Patrick Kaleta and P.A. Parenteau unsurprisingly found each other and engaged in high gloves to face-turned-hug-turn-I-don't-like-you-someone-break-us-up. That caused the second period to start 4-on-4, which was at least a novelty in a sleepy game.

* As of now Poulin picked up the second assist (via Parenteau) on Nielsen's goal. Sort of doubt they saved the puck for him though.

* * *

The Isles mounted a few maybe-almost-not-really chances in the final five minutes and with the goalie pulled, but it was too little too late. The Islanders were outshot 37-31, trailed for 58:49 of the game, and looked a willing partner in a mutual display of defensive sloppiness between two flawed teams. With the win the Sabres leapfrogged the Isles for 11th in the East, dropping the Isles into a futile three-way tie for 12th at 58 points.

I don't know if the flu weakened more players than we know amid this back-to-back, or if the line imbalance after Bailey's injury -- Marty Reasoner got a few more minutes -- kept them out of sync, but it wasn't an impressive effort against a fellow weak Eastern team.

The Islanders host the Rangers Friday, a case where the two rivals are at almost completely opposite ends of the standings. Whatever will their lineup look like then? What, pray tell, will the performance look like?

Considering their two performances in the last 48 hours, maybe the reality of their fading playoff hopes is setting in. Certainly it should be.

Comment 232 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The top 4 teams in the Eastern Conference

…are from the Atlantic.

"The reader of this sentence exists only while reading me."

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Feb 21, 2012 9:53 PM EST reply actions  

True.

And that’s part of the reason they are 5th.

"The reader of this sentence exists only while reading me."

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Feb 21, 2012 10:00 PM EST up reply actions  

The top team in the Southeast is...

…closer to the Isles in points than 4th Atlantic team.

"The reader of this sentence exists only while reading me."

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Feb 21, 2012 9:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Atlantin' ain't easy

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Feb 21, 2012 10:05 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I wonder how many hits both teams had?

if both teams knew the flu bug was around – not a good idea to make contact and share bodily fluids and all that

by Cary K on Feb 21, 2012 10:01 PM EST reply actions  

Rolston

Was he on with Koivu and/or Bouchard for all his big years in Minny? Please, please don’t freak, but with that shot, just curious what results he could get beside JT.

by 4195mary on Feb 21, 2012 10:05 PM EST reply actions  

All of his skills have declined

He used to be a threat from the PP point as well.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Feb 21, 2012 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

His shot

May still be hard and quick, but he takes so long to wind up and get it off, I don’t think he would ever get it off before the puck would be taken away.

by Furkmyster on Feb 22, 2012 1:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed. Seeing him now, it seems like he could only be effective beside an all-star center.

by 4195mary on Feb 21, 2012 10:09 PM EST reply actions  

Rolston couldn't be effective now if he

was on a line with Bossy and Trottier. Or Gretzky and Gordie Howe. Or Cyclone Taylor and the guy who invented hockey.

by martylnd on Feb 21, 2012 10:13 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

OMFG

How in the hell do you guys get these recaps up so fast?!!??!

……?!???!?

Props, seriously!

by cnss84 on Feb 21, 2012 10:20 PM EST via Android app reply actions   1 recs

I believe there should be an "ooga!" in there somewhere.

And verbs are highly overrated.

Loss? Not tough enough. Wang cheap. Ooga!

Contributor for Lighthouse Hockey. Definitely neither the Sniper nor the Enforcer.

by ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles on Feb 22, 2012 9:00 AM EST up reply actions  

My friend, you have been the most consistent performer this year. Bravo!

Contributor for Lighthouse Hockey. Definitely neither the Sniper nor the Enforcer.

by ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles on Feb 22, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

This. Is. Awesome.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Feb 22, 2012 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe with the season more or less over

We could start doing some MadLib recaps?

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 9:06 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

HA!

That would actually be funny. They post the blanks first (3 verbs, 4 player names, etc) then you fill them into the story. I love it.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Feb 22, 2012 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

This is a good thing.

With this loss, the Islanders can abandon their “playoff chase” and focus on next year. Sign Nabokov for a season, and Parenteau for whatever he wants. Get Okposo and Bailey to ask themselves some hard questions about what kind of players they want to be. And I agree with Staple (from his chat today), that Grabner needs to straighten out his mental blocks and start finishing those breakaways.

Without an actual NHL defense, this team is unbearable to watch. No revelations here: Streit and MacDonald are OK but they’re complimentary parts. Hamonic (when he’s not hurt) is just 21. Make plans to wave goodbye to the other guys and start anew. And not by hoping some kids turn the corner in the fall. Go out and get two top 6ers that are 30 or younger with skill.

And don’t give me any horseshit about toughness, grit, fire, heart or other voodoo. It’s about talent, or a lack thereof. If they had six 5’10" guys that had good speed, were positionally sound, blocked shots and kept the puck moving in the right direction but never laid a finger on an opposing player, the Islanders would be 100 times better.

"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science

by PGI on Feb 21, 2012 10:39 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

but they dont

Or at least cant figure out how. So the only way to succeed in the absence of sufficient talent is through toughness, grit, heart, and outworking your opponemt religiously (aka vodoo). Or, you can play like they have recently vs mtl, florida and the last two, completely uncompetitive. With a similarly weak defense, this same core was much more competitive in the second half of last season. How do you not get that the fire and grit guys who were dispatched comprised the difference?

by randyboyd on Feb 21, 2012 11:15 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I "get it"

I also get that those same heart and grit guys helped the team go 1-for-November last season. And the same team without them went 5-for-November this season. Heart and grit is worthless without guys than can put the puck in the net or, occasionally, stop the other team from doing it on a consistent basis.

"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science

by PGI on Feb 21, 2012 11:22 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

i agree

That talent is the priority, which is why i cant understand why the team decided to replace the heart and grit, which are necessary ingedients to compliment talent, with less talented, older, slower players. With the quality pk unnits we already had, how did replacing haley with pandolfo make any sense? How do you let a washed up rolston continue to play? The talent drought is partly self inflicted here.

by randyboyd on Feb 21, 2012 11:34 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Reasoner and Rolston weren't supposed to be completely useless. Pandolfo was probably expected to be only

slightly better than useless and I think he has delivered on those expectations but Reasoner and Rolston have been huge disappointments.

by TMS71 on Feb 22, 2012 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

better to lose now over a colapse in a week. Sign PA first. Then, I hate to say this but the guy who could give us the best return is striet. Somebody who wants to improve their power play would give up the goods. Last two gamse his error gave up the first early goal. By the time the kids are ready for prime time he wont be. He gets pushed around. A good d-man is tough to play against, he is not. The rest of the obvious guys will be gone.

by Peloose on Feb 21, 2012 11:18 PM EST up reply actions  

If other teams haven't noticed those errors...

… Then I’d say deal him. His age meant he would be an invaluable player on a team of kids, but it also meant he likely wouldn’t be here around the time the Isles expect to win championships. The only way that would have happened is if he managed to keep his skill level from declining too rapidly. Alas, with last year’s terrible injury, that appears to no longer be an option. I’d like nothing more than to see him hoist the Cup, but i just don’t see that happening anymore.

Contributor for Lighthouse Hockey. Definitely neither the Sniper nor the Enforcer.

by ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles on Feb 22, 2012 9:06 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree mostly, especially doing whatever it takes, within reason, to bring PAP back.

But I also think Isles need to get a bit more physical. Yes, talent and skill matter more, but refs have been putting away their whistles in the past few weeks and Isles are losing some battles because they are not the more physical team. Regardless of whether Isles re-sign Jurcina, they need to add a physical defenseman— one who can play top-4 minutes so that each of the top 2 pairs has a physical defenseman with good skills. And if Isles can’t get more physicality from Okposo than we’ve seen recently, they need to find a forward who provides that. It is ridiculous that Martin is the only forward who finishes his checks with any kind of intensity consistently. (It is ridiculous that Parenteau is 2nd at finishing his checks well without being caught out of position much.)

"The reader of this sentence exists only while reading me."

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Feb 21, 2012 11:18 PM EST up reply actions  

PAs not signing here

His agent has already said they aren’t negotiating while the season is still ongoing. That’s a sure sign he’s going to test the market and move on. PA needs to be dealt.

If anything this team needs to hold the same philosophy on guys who aren’t signed when camp breaks. If you’re not signed by the trade deadline you go on the chopping block. That’s the whole point of selling.

by Chickendirt on Feb 22, 2012 12:53 AM EST up reply actions  

PA signed only a one year deal to return

So he isn’t like Grabs and Mattty Mo who took what the best offer to stay long term. The Islanders or PAPs camp felt one year to see what he could do or one year to bridge him to UFA status was the way to go.

Since I wasn’t in on the negotiations I have no idea why this season was a one year deal. If it was by the Islanders choice then PAP has proven he deserves a few years and a raise. If it was PAPs choice, then he isn’t going to sign even in the off season since he knows this is his big payday after being left as a career AHLer. If we are talking the latter case, where you know he wants to get to UFA Status, then Garth has to deal him for whatever he can get.

Seeing some of the deals out there, you have to think he can land a 2nd rounder or late first at a minimum. LA is desperate to make the playoffs, so many other teams need secondary scoring, not just the usual defensive depth.

Every time Mike Mottau plays defense, a snow angel gets its wings.

by Hockey1919 on Feb 22, 2012 9:09 AM EST up reply actions  

PA signed only a one year deal to return So he isn’t like Grabs and Mattty Mo who took what the best offer to stay long term.

That isnt fair- Moulson signed a 1y deal, too.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Feb 22, 2012 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Okay in fairness I need clarification

PA signed a one year deal and so did Moulson at the time, but was Moulson bridging to UFA Status? I don’t recall. I believe that the original PAP and Moulson 1-year deals were signed to evaluate where the player fit into the grand scheme. PAP already had little bit more NHL experience when he signed his first one year deal, but I think both sides have been a little less committed to each other from the start. Just my opinion.

I clearly stated, I wasn’t part of the negotiation, so I’m not sure why PAP signed a 1-year deal again as opposed to a longer term deal. For all I know it was never offered. Grabs and Moulson clearly felt comfortable with the longer term deals they were offered. Not sure if PAP was offered that or not, but it is something to consider when Garth is looking at making a deal.

Every time Mike Mottau plays defense, a snow angel gets its wings.

by Hockey1919 on Feb 22, 2012 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Moulson was an RFA in the summer of 2010 and agreed to his one-year contract with the Isles hours before his arbitration hearing.

Parenteau was to be a UFA last year before he signed his one-year deal in February 2011.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 11:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for the update

So my thinking was they were in dissimilar contract situations. Moulson wasn’t going anywhere so he was committed to a one year deal and he wasn’t a risk to the Islanders.. PAP didn’t have much leverage based on a single season , but it looks like he and the Islanders wanted to see more before committing..

Every time Mike Mottau plays defense, a snow angel gets its wings.

by Hockey1919 on Feb 22, 2012 11:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Yup

Now Parenteau wants a longer contract that the Islanders just may not be willing to provide him.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Playoffs Next Year also Looking Very Dim

Isles are not making the playoffs next year if PA or Nabokov are not here (unless Garth manages to bring in other comparably talented replacements….doubtful).

PA will not be here one way or another. I’m a little more optimistic about Nabokov.

This team simply is not ready. The kids are still not ready to carry this team, besides Tavares. Unless we have a couple of Hamonics on the forward line come out of nowhere next year, which is a lot to hope for, next year is another rebuilding year.

We took one step forward in the 2nd half of last season, and now we’ve taken two steps back this season. This is all on Garth…he’s got to do something about it. Trading Streit may not be a bad idea.

by JPinNYC on Feb 22, 2012 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Even with PA and Nabokov next year is a reach

The team started too far back with too few prospects to turn it around in anything less than five years. They are still developing their “first” draft class. Even other bad teams had minor league depth and serviceable NHLer that could trade for picks while retaining a few core players. The Islanders had none of the above.

Next season they need to be competing for a playoff spot, just as they should be this season. Now I don’t believe they will make the playoffs this season or next, but they should at least be in a position to compete. This has been a tough two-game stretch, but they really are within striking distance of the playoffs and a couple of wins could change everyone’s out look. They just can’t sustain it because they lack depth.

Every time Mike Mottau plays defense, a snow angel gets its wings.

by Hockey1919 on Feb 22, 2012 11:13 AM EST up reply actions  

The team started too far back with too few prospects to turn it around in anything less than five years.

This is obviously kind of true. And I never expected them to be Stanley Cup contenders either this year or a couple of years down the road. The completely empty prospect pool on the one hand and them still not collecting too many top-3 picks were always going to be tough to overcome in that regard and lead to a difficult transition period.

But it’s not about contending for the Cup anyway, the goal should be just to start winning games again, building a deep franchise, attracting fans, free agents, etc. Honestly, with the kind of season they’re having now, it’s a very small step towards these goals and, as you mention too, might not be a much bigger one next year. If we remember they finished with 79 points (9 outside the playoffs) in 09-10 with JT in his rookie season, below average goaltending, some injury woes, etc., then that’s a very disappointing progress in my opinion. With the way things have been going they’re even likely to finish below 79 points this year.

We could talk about the reasons for hours, it’s been a difficult, sometimes strange two years. But anyway, the empty prospect pool some years ago can’t be the explanation or an excuse.
Apparently, two disappointing years with not much progress on a team basis will most of the times not destroy or even hamper the rebuild, but it is frustrating and not really acceptable.

by BenHasna on Feb 22, 2012 12:46 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I can't say i disagree...

This is the time to explore.
Losing PA, and our UFA history leaves us with something resembling
Ullstrom-Bailey-Niederreiter next year. i’d much rather see Ullstrom-Bailey-Parentau/Okposo on friday and see what fruit that brings. Then you can get a wheelbarrow full of money and calendars for Parentau. Or you had better be prepared to spend on an experienced RW, or suffer through growing another one.

I know cary says Nabby is mediocre at best, but I say, better the mediocrity you know, than the one you don’t know. If you are having problems signing Nabby, bury his ass so we can see what Montoya and Poulin can do. Remember, they still have Nilson in BPT as a possible backup next year, and Koskinen in europe. there will also be the fall back of UFA goaltenders at the flea market in July, and that really is the only buying Snow has had any historical success with.

The main thing is getting to see some of the defensemen in the NHL again. Wishart needs to replace eaton ASAP. He probably won’t be an improvement, but he’ll most likely be available to them in October… so why not try to get him into NHL readiness.
Donovan is probably being close to where Macdonald was when his NHL journey began… but that should be considered a card only played if they must…Katic is probably a better option at this juncture.
I think CIL said that they can probably add two of (Wishart, Ness, Katic, Donovan, dehaan) to Hamonic, macdonald, Streit and have a servicable(“imporved”) D next year. I would prefer them signing Jurcina even if he spends most of his time in the press box, for depth, if nothing else… and trying realy hard to find a 20 minute mobile 210+ physical defenseman on the UFA market … That market gets smaller each day.

first priority though… SIgn PARENTAU!!!!

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 11:48 AM EST up reply actions  

I get a sense we may very well see MM-JT-NN as the first line next year. Which would possibly mean

DU-JB-KO
MMa-FN-MG
MR

next year even without PAP. Keep PAP he goes on Bailey’s line, FNGO is reunited, and MMa heads back to the 4th.

I don’t think bringing back Nabokov would have a discernable impact from signing any of the other retreads that will be available in July.

As you say, the big question will be seeing how many dmen can make an NHL impact. This is where the team can get NOTICEABLY better next season. Hopefully everyone can get a go-round before BP’s playoffs start.

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

you did that just to make my BP go up, didn't you...
MR

This is one of the reasons I am falling off the Capuano wagon. I think the coaches have done a pretty good job with the defense they were given, but the forwards seem to be in a hole. At first I thought it was mostly due to the lack of offensive contributions by the D… but that is a smaller part of it than I thought.
When you look back to last year they have actually regressed.
Moulson-JT-Parentau… they have gotten better by playing together and JT’s maturity as a generational NHLer… Parentau doesn’t offer much more than Okie on that line… most of what’s generated is between JT and Moulson.
Grabner-Nielsen-Okposo… this line suffers by the lack of defensive mobility. I think they would be just as good with Nino as the RW.
The big decline is on Bailey’s line. Bailey, himself is not contributing as much as he should at this point, and it’s hard to say it’s not because of Rolston. Bailey needs to be looked at as the #2 offensive center, and should be cultivated as such. Matt martin is improving, but not to the point where he is making his linemates better… that might be a year or two away.
Rolston is an anchor. he is even worse than a CAP MULE, he’s a CAP ANCHOR.
this is why i want to see Ullstrom-Bailey-Parentau. they might even be a net minus line for a while, but this would serve as a solid scoring threat on every shift, and a vast improvement over any construct they’ve thrown out there as a second line PP over the past 10 years.
Then you’d have (next year) a fourth line of:
Matt Martin-Marty reasoner-Rhett Rakhshani
with (Dibenedetto/Haley/Colliton/Kabanov/Petrov(?)/Nelson(?)) being situational reserves in BPT.
The key to making this work… SIgnING PAP!

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I definitely agree with the overall sentiment. I think the forwards have been a problem just as much as the defense. Let’s also remember at this point that the 8 most important forwards (JT, PA, Moulson, Nielsen, Grabner, Okposo, Bailey, Martin) have missed the grand total of one game combined due to injury this season. That’s unbeliveable and will never happen again. What they’ve done with it is a big disappointment.

The sad thing on the other hand is that I feel Ullstrom and Rakhshani may be a little overrated. Them on lines 3 and 4 respectively, plus Nino on Nielsen’s, might pose quite some problems, too. But indeed, that’s why we’d need to see them in the next few weeks – and sign PA.

by BenHasna on Feb 22, 2012 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

The problem is

our bottom six hasn’t killed us. It’s been the lack of scoring from 4-6, whomever you want to consider those guys to be. Short of a Nino explosion, or Strome making the jump, I’m not sure we can expect that to change a whole lot.

This year has been overly-simple. When JT is scoring points, we win. If he doesn’t we lose.

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

agree here JP

although i was never on the Capuano wagon.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I have driven the wagon...

Now it’s being driven by a mule…

…and you can see where that has us.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Which end is Rolston?

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Feb 22, 2012 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry

That was supposed to read ? – MR – ? as in Someone from BP – Reasoner – Someone from BP. Not sure what happened with the formatting there.

In essence, I more or less agree with you. Though if PAP is gone, I think you’re going to see Nino on the first line (and may see it anyway). But I’d love PAP to be back and on Bailey’s line.

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

i was hoping nino would progress quick enough to play on the 1st line.....

but i do not see how in the world the Islanders can go into next season with the thought of Nino playing on either of the top 2 lines. Im not really sure we even have a 2nd and 3rd line. They would both be interchangeable if it werent for Rolston. But back to Nino, his development this year has to be well behind anyone expected. From watching him and gauging where his game is now, he will need a Tavares like improvement next year just to keep up on a 1st or 2nd line. I just dont see it. This is the importance of PA. Nobody is figuring Strome in anywhere either. Perhaps Snow leaves him down another year after seeing what happened to Nino this year. I would be perfectly fine with that. Snow said there was nothing left to learn in juniors for Bailey and Nino, but i cant for the life of me see what you taught them up here. Let Strome develop and step into the lineup where he can make an immediate impact, not learn the ropes at the expense of the team.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

But back to Nino, his development this year has to be well behind anyone expected.

Not sure I agree with this. Obviously he hasn’t done any scoring, but he hasn’t been put in a position to do so. That said, he looks much better in his own zone, much better moving the puck through the neutral zone, and much better without the puck than he did at the beginning of the year. I think that’s what the team was hoping for, banking on the fact that a guy like him will be able to find the net when placed in that role. Would it be nice to confirm that some before the end of the year? Definitely. I’d love to see him on the PP at the very least in the next couple of months, and I’m pretty sure we will.

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 2:34 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Nino

I think the overall point and sentiment is: If we are expecting/hoping Nino replaces PAP next year, it is another reqbuilding year. Nino should be expected to start next year in the Bridge…hands down. Unless he completely surprises in camp, which is doubtful.

by JPinNYC on Feb 22, 2012 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that is one sentiment, but I think it shortchanges what he’s accomplished this year. He’s a top 5 pick. Not sure why it’s doubtful he would play well in training camp. Or even this season.

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I just don’t see him being ready in training camp. He is not ready now, so I don’t see what could happen in a Summer that would make him ready in September. He needs time at the Bridge to start the season next year, and he’d be there now if he were eligible.

by JPinNYC on Feb 22, 2012 5:45 PM EST up reply actions  

i thought nino was more impressive in his 9 game stint last year than this year......

I totally agree that he is not being put in a position to succeed offensively. But as far as im concerned, a player should do what he is good at and slowly chip away at the rest of his game. Nino doesnt help this team trying to learn his defensive game at this level when he hasnt even figured out his offensive game at this level. How long did it take Yzerman to finally figure out the defensive side of his game? Atleast he had tremendous offensive output in the meantime. We drafted Nino as an offensive player, so let him try to provide some offense. Learning the defensive side and the rest of the little things will come with time. We have turned Josh Bailey into a 3rd line penalty killing forward, lets not do the same with Nino.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Turned him into?

Why are we all assuming that none of this is within the player’s control? We’re talking about hockey players, not piles of Legos. Even if Bailey had a more traditional development path, he may be exactly what he is right now.

I talk this way as well, so I’m not singling out any individual on this. Bailey’s age 20 season made it seem like he was well on his way, and these last two years have looked like a regression… but again, is he being made into a poor man’s Jordan Staal on purpose, or is he being used in this fashion because the coaches have seen that it maximizes his skills?

In some parallel universe, Bailey is a 20-50 guy enjoying a breakout year on a dangerous second line, teams can’t key on Matty, Tavs, and PAP, and the Isles are sitting pretty in fifth place in the East. Also, I don’t drink as much.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Feb 22, 2012 3:37 PM EST up reply actions  

The Islanders of Earth-2

have already won 3 Stanley Cups as a result of the rebuild.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Stinking Earth-2

Lording it over us with their winning hockey team and flying cars and plentiful supply of brandy.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Feb 22, 2012 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Parallel Universe Islanders

have Zach Parise, too. Don’t forget him.

"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science

by PGI on Feb 22, 2012 3:59 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Im not saying Bailey himself shouldnt be a scapegoat of his development.....

but its no secret how the Isles have handled this kid. Brought up too early to teach him the defensive side of things because they didnt want him to develop “bad habits” in the OHL. Sounds eerily familiar to me. Moved to wing in favor of Rob Schremp, then back to center, then back to wing…..
He looked great at the beginning of last year, then got hurt, regressed and never found his footing again. IMO, he was never really given the chance to succeed again. Bailey needs players around him to be successful and utilize his skill set. I love his vision and playmaking ability, but its hard for that to get noticed when you are playing with matt martin and brian rolston, He didnt even get PP time til halfway through the season. Frans Neilsen hasnt produced well offensively, but he continues to be played over Bailey in those situations. Give Bailey a shot and give him something to work with. If it still doesnt work i will have to re-evaluate my personal opinion of his game, but until this happens i will continue to speculate. Do i feel Bailey can be better and play with more passion? Yes, but i can also say that for 95% of the team so i dont think its fair to single him out. People say that he hasnt earned it and hasnt done enough to show he can handle that role, but what is he supposed to do? He is what he is. He wasnt drafted for his physical play, or defense, or goal scoring ability. He is a playmaker. He needs people who know how to finish around him. What can he possibly do to get recognized? If you pass to guys who cant score or stick handle, or pass themselves, your not going to have much success. Remember, before Tavares came along Snow thought so much of Bailey to move down two spots to select him. I dont think that move was an attempt to draft a defensive forward. Give him the opportunity to succed in the role you drafted him for. (An offensive playmaking center with good character). Thats all im asking.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

How are we supposed to get the talent here? Free agents don’t want to play here. So do we trade away future talent? And whats that talent worth? What are we gonna get in return?

by Icefan71 on Feb 22, 2012 8:07 AM EST up reply actions  

i agree with your player assesments, but if your going to tell me that toughness, grit, fire and heart dont matter........

i have to 100% disagree with that statement. 95% of the time heart and determination will supersede talent. Talented players: Alex Kovalev, Alexei Yashin, Nikolai Zherdev, Alex Semin. Funny how i can only pull Russian examples off the top of my head, but thats besides the point. All of those guys mentioned have world class talent, but no heart, grit or determination. Ill take Ryan Smyth, Ryan Callahan, Milan Lucic, and Eric Cole over the above mentioned guys any day. If im going to battle in a playoff series i take the guys below. Now if your classifying tougness, grit, heart and fire as 4th line players then that needs to be clarified. The Isles have talent right now and they barely lay a finger on anyone, but it hasnt helped them

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd rather have Kovalev the Flake, than Ryan Smith the crier

Kovalev has shown up in the playoffs and won, Ryan Smith…. nothing. I think this may in part be a Canadian narrative thing. Muller is also another one of those character guys that refused to play were it was tough. Shanahan bailed on Hartford, but he is a character guy. Messier helped Vancouver implode – read the marketing best captain ever. The rest of your examples are pretty good, but these guys all have talent to go with their determination.

Do the Islanders need guys that battle more along the boards, I’d say yes, but once that puck is moved into the prime scoring areas it still isn’t going into the net unless they add more talent. I think Okposo can fill that role and he’s a guy we need to see more of. PAP the little bastard has enough spirit for two guys, but not the size. MArtin is another guy that can do it, but he doesn’t have the skill level.

Every time Mike Mottau plays defense, a snow angel gets its wings.

by Hockey1919 on Feb 22, 2012 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Kovalev had some good years in Pitt but he was surrounded by great players......

All crying aside, Ryan Smyth carried a mediocre team on his back to the Stanley Cup Finals. I dont think Messier could be classified as anything but one of the best leaders and heart and soul players of all time. He was also very talented though. I once took a shit on one of his hockey cards holding the cup when i was younger, but i would never dis credit the man in the sport of hockey. He was in his twighlight in Vancouver i dont think thats fair to asses him on that stint.
I dont think the guys i mentioned are the most talented players, they get by and put up numbers becasue of their grit, and determination. What they are not is 4th liners which is why i wanted clarification on that. Ryan Smyth looks like one of the least talented players ever when you watch him, but he managed to put up really impressive #’s for most of his career. Just because some guys you mentioned bailed on particular teams doesnt take away from how they played on the ice.
IMO, a big reason the puck doesnt go into the net for the Isles is because they dont go to the net. They play the perimeter game way too much. Outside of JT when was the last time you saw an Islander take the puck and really drive to the net with his teammates crashing it as well for a possible rebound. On the other hand, how many times have you seen an Islander player take the puck to the outside and lose it along the boards or skate into an area where he has an impossible angle to hit the net? I feel we have skill, Tavares is all world, PA is a great passer with good vision, i really like Baileys playmaking ability even though its wildly inconsistent, Okposo has enough skill to finish, Moulson can finish, Nielsen has good vision. We need bigger bodies to bang and create space for these guys to make things happen and help win them the puck along the boards. Just my opinion. I always favor players who make every shift count and put their heart in every shift over a world class talented player who isnt 100% motivated. Thats just me though

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

i do think we can use another shooter though......

a player with a heavy shot (sorry Rolston this just isnt meant for you) who can snipe can really create space and work wonders for the players around him too. Streit used to have this effect on the PP, but he seems relegated to a slap pass now instead of firing his shot on net.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 12:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I was thinking of Kovalev in 94 with the Rangers, may have been his best effort ever.

and the Messier thing is a mixed bag, for every player he “willed” to win, I always thought it was more about him than him being a leader. Downside of the carrer is no excures for Rolston, so no sympathy for Messier either.

Bailing on a team means a ton to me. I could easily say that every Islander would play with heart and grit if it mattered. Just trade them to the Wings and they have a reason to compete. The real heart and soul guys are the ones that pull the crappy teasm through bad times and win it in the end. Martin and Hamonic are kids that look like they would compete for anything.

As for going to the net agree 100%. Okpos does it on odd occasion, Moulson can be found in the dirty areas, but it tails off after that.

Every time Mike Mottau plays defense, a snow angel gets its wings.

by Hockey1919 on Feb 22, 2012 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I really enjoyed how this was casually dropped in there

I once took a shit on one of his hockey cards holding the cup when i was younger

by Dorfer on Feb 22, 2012 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

lol true story......

only problem was that it wouldnt flush. So i had to grab it back out of the toilet bowl

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Lets be honest an asses where this team stands in the playoff push.

Does this team play playoff desperate hockey in the majority of their games? NO
Does this team often fail to show up for games: YES
Does this team’s defense offer any help on offense? NO
The two No answers should be YES and the YES should be NO.
If this continues……

We are all Islanders, even if we’re from Jersey!

by Russel Ginart on Feb 21, 2012 11:08 PM EST reply actions  

i had no desire to post anything after the sens game...

now after 2 straight losses…i can firmly say: this team is not making the playoffs. i’m also not buying into any teases that may occur down the stretch.

they almost came back and tied it, but it was quite simple. buffalo outplayed them all game. they shut down the isles and i have to tip my hat to lindy ruff and his boys.

i’m not going to continue to sound like a broken record, but the sentiments are still the same: rolston and pandolfo…ugh.

bed. talk to you all later.

"Redemption? Sure. But in the end, he's just another dead rat in a garbage pail behind a Chinese restaurant."

by gukid17 on Feb 21, 2012 11:12 PM EST reply actions  

To put it into perspective

Rolston 4G 5A 9PTS –11
Staios 0G 7A 7PTS –12
Pandolfo 1G 1A 2PTS –11
RDP (2assists), has as many points as Pandolfo.

We are all Islanders, even if we’re from Jersey!

by Russel Ginart on Feb 21, 2012 11:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Lets not forget: Reasoner 0G 5A 5PTS, --17

We are all Islanders, even if we’re from Jersey!

by Russel Ginart on Feb 21, 2012 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m most disappointed with Reasoner, although Rolston is really close too. You’d think someone would at least try harder to extend his NHL career. No one’s going to sign him after this mess of a season.

"Mark D: the internet's foremost chronicler of Milburian insanity" - Pretty Good Idiot
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Feb 21, 2012 11:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Rolston has to know his career is over.

And Reasoner has another season with Isles, right?

"The reader of this sentence exists only while reading me."

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Feb 21, 2012 11:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I can see someone giving Reasoner another shot though. He’s been a pretty solid 20-30 point player for a while now.

"Mark D: the internet's foremost chronicler of Milburian insanity" - Pretty Good Idiot
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Feb 22, 2012 12:05 AM EST up reply actions  

At this point Reasoner has to be chalked up as a disappointment

This isn’t even about Konopka who is a healthy scratch for the Sens. This is about a guy that should be an immediate upgrade for the fourth line and has been much closer to Rolston than Nielsen.

Rolston was an attempt to meet the floor , shed salary for next season and see if he had anything left after a strong second half last year. He could have acheived objective 1 and 2 without playing a single game, but objective 3 has sunk this team on many nights. So I still have no problem with the deal, buyt yes I have a problem waiving Comeau to keep Rolston.

Every time Mike Mottau plays defense, a snow angel gets its wings.

by Hockey1919 on Feb 22, 2012 9:13 AM EST up reply actions  

If you still think the Isles are in the playoff hunt

please, please help a brother out and clue me in to what you’re smoking/drinking/snorting/injecting.

Amateurs practice til they get it right. Professionals practice til they can't get it wrong.

by Torgo on Feb 21, 2012 11:14 PM EST reply actions  

ummmm.... Jameson and Percocet?

"Scorching the back of my neck with a revolving red light!"

by FGS on Feb 22, 2012 1:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Are you wearing pants?

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Feb 22, 2012 12:37 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Couldn't agree more.

Rec’d.

Being born in New York and rooting for the Islanders, Jets, and Mets. Yeah, I know.
Twitter: cmauceri524

by CharlieIsles on Feb 22, 2012 7:41 AM EST up reply actions  

No way!

Rolston and something else for tornail clippings. Toenail clippings can score more goals than Rolston.

by martylnd on Feb 22, 2012 9:09 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

And then:

Trade bag of pucks + peanuts + shells + clippings + extra bags for…

A seventh-round draft pick in 2016!

And Bob’s your uncle.

It is Diduck.

by Paumanok on Feb 22, 2012 9:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Bring back Kaspar

to coach these guys on how to hit and show some heart. And also, because it gives us excuses to watch more old videos of him laying out Messier, Lemieux, and Gretzky

by CostiganR on Feb 22, 2012 7:57 AM EST up reply actions  

very very very very very well said........

I’ve been preaching this all season. I dont want to say they “dont care” because im sure they all do. They just obviously do not know what it takes to win and apparently we have nobody in the organization to show them that.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 8:26 AM EST up reply actions  

yet that's the alleged reason we got all the old vets?

I agree – they don’t play like they know what needs to be done. I thought the reason they brought in Pandolfo, Mottau, Eaton, Staios, Rolston (stop me before I throw up), Reasoner, Jurcina ad nauseum is because they were veterans who could help lead the youngsters. The young players who follow them are going right over the cliff.

(Pandolfo plays hard. He just doesn’t do it well. The rest have been useless.)

by martylnd on Feb 22, 2012 9:23 AM EST up reply actions  

This may all be true, so I won't argue or question your statement, but,,,,,,,,,

I WANT AN EFFORT FROM THIS TEAM ON 98% OF GAMES. Not the lackuster shit we saw Monday vs. the Sens! Give me a solid effort and no one will trash this team when they loose! Give us a shit effort and everyone is responsable from coach to fourth line player. NO EXCUSE!

We are all Islanders, even if we’re from Jersey!

by Russel Ginart on Feb 22, 2012 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

You do get an effort in almost every game.

But Id like to point out that
“effort” does not = “win”
and
“loss” does not = “no effort”.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Feb 22, 2012 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I think they do put real effort in most every game.

The thing is that effort alone doesnt win games.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Feb 22, 2012 10:23 PM EST up reply actions  

The Game Was As Bland As Unseasoned Toast

I think Im starting to understand Ranger fans…this sucks.

by IslesFanForLife on Feb 22, 2012 1:34 AM EST reply actions  

You can only do that

You can only understand Ranger fans by drooling on yourself and being interested only when they win. Plus you must have a police record and an IQ less than 4½.

by martylnd on Feb 22, 2012 6:29 AM EST up reply actions  

There are 28 other teams out there, you know.

Well okay, a few are even worse, but you get my point.

It is Diduck.

by Paumanok on Feb 22, 2012 9:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, I guess this is from the perspective of someone 4000 miles away from the closest NHL team.

It is Diduck.

by Paumanok on Feb 22, 2012 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

worst news

Has anyone taken a look at the market lately?

Two weeks ago when some of us were realistically saying that the playoffs was a non-starter, Chicago and Detroit were interested in goalies. They had first round picks available. Since then Crawford has played well and Howard came back. No more need. Defenders were moved for second round picks, and those needs no longer exist. I am afraid that Snow may have waited himself out of a good market and he’ll get a lot less back in value then if he had moved two weeks ago.

Hopefully there’s some value for Eaton, Staios, Jurcina, Reasoner and and Nabokov and Parenteau if those last two aren’t willing to be Islanders next year.

by martylnd on Feb 22, 2012 6:28 AM EST reply actions  

why is everyone so eager to move Nabakov at the trade deadline?

we’ve already heard he’s in contract talks with Snow. This is a very good thing. Have you been blind to this whole season? Get it through your heads, Al Montoya is not the answer short term or long term. Without Nabokov, you can kiss next season goodbye too.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 8:28 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not

unless we can’t sign him.

Preference 1 is keep him
Preference 2 is trade

by martylnd on Feb 22, 2012 9:07 AM EST up reply actions  

The Nabokov trade talk is a distraction

Nabokov moves if and only if Snow finds a partner and Nabokov wants to go there at this point in the season. If Snow gets absolutely nothing for Nabokov we at least go to see what we should expect from a starting goaltender at league minim um wages this season.

Put more effort into signing him for 2 seasons than trying to find a trade partner because the assumption is you won’t get much since he is an expiring asset anyway and goaltenders for all their worth come cheap.

Every time Mike Mottau plays defense, a snow angel gets its wings.

by Hockey1919 on Feb 22, 2012 9:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Detroit did NOT want a goalie… Chicago did though and they still might.

OPERATION TANK IS A GO.
In an unprecedented move 9 teams in the Eastern Conference have decided to officially "pass" on the playoffs

by Ubiquitous on Feb 22, 2012 10:00 AM EST up reply actions  

am guessing

we’ll trade 1 D for a low pick, and sign Nabby

PAP is an interesting one – they may hold on but if the right trade came along…..

by Cary K on Feb 22, 2012 7:13 AM EST reply actions  

D pairs

So, they decided to give the pairs of the previous game (Streit-MacDonald, Eaton-Jurcina, Ness-Staios) another shot, only to shuffle two minutes in after the first breakdown. Sure, you can’t expect Streit and AMac to screw up their first shift, but still, it was obvious the pairs didn’t work against Ottawa and a bit of a mistery anyway why they’d never gone back to the decent Streit/Jurcina pairing since I think Staios’ comeback. Maybe it’s a detail and I’m not saying pre-game changes would have led to a better result, but yeah, for me that’s definitely a wrong call they made there. Glad however they did adjust quickly.

by BenHasna on Feb 22, 2012 7:44 AM EST reply actions  

Never has there been a better time to...

…experiment with 1-3-1 formation and scratch Staios, Eaton, and Jurcina.

"The reader of this sentence exists only while reading me."

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Feb 22, 2012 8:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Hey, this late in the season, we are still discussing the playoffs. We are still nibbling at .500. Remember last year this time? Out of the hunt and well under .500. I’ll be the 1st to admit I’m disappointed, but this team is much better than last year. A bunch of youngsters and some veterans whose careers are over. Maybe if we keep Nabby, he can go take some marketing and sales classes at NCC over the summer. Then he can spend some time in the off season working on a sales pitch to get some help here. Then he can knock on (insert desirable free agent)‘s door with his power point presentation and set up in the guy’s living room.

by Icefan71 on Feb 22, 2012 8:20 AM EST reply actions  

Let's hear it for Frans though, eh?

Guy looks like he might hot-streak himself to his first 20 goal season if he keeps this up.

And the sucker already signed! That’s not how you get paid, bro!

Still feels weird cheering for Nabokov

by ilopan on Feb 22, 2012 8:30 AM EST reply actions  

agree with a little bit here.....

its a nice step to get to .500, but we’ve fallen back again. If we can finish the season at .500 with this make shift lineup i would say things are trending up. I’ve just really been rubbed the wrong way by this teams lethargic play and lack of determination all season long. Even in teh most important and crucial games this team is not showing up. Thats alarming to me. And as it stands now, i dont see any major help coming from outside the organization next season.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 8:31 AM EST reply actions  

Andrew MacDonald

I’m pretty done with this guy. He cannot retrieve the puck and move it away from pressure. I know there’s a soft spot for the guy b/c of his story, but he consistently misplays the puck after retrieving it from his own corner. He does this even when he has time. He has a tendency to wait for the forechecker to get close, then try to move the puck, but it never seems like he has a plan.

To me, this team only has two defensemen that can play on a perennial playoff team and that’s Hamonic and Streit.

"It don't make you a bad person" - Ron Bennington

by Pauly C on Feb 22, 2012 8:42 AM EST reply actions  

Defending the Mac

I see what you are saying on poor play but I disagree that its a symptom of a lack of skill. With injuries and the overall crapness of the Islanders defense, he is being over utilized. He should be more a 4 or 5 guy but is thrust into the top 2. And he’s probably feeling the pressure to do too much. Would you rather him be jettisoned over Jurcina, Eaton, Staios, Mottau?

Let him have some consistent and talented help so he can play where he is supposed to and he will be quite a good defenseman. He’s shown it before.

by GreekIsles83 on Feb 22, 2012 8:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Remember that he is also coming back from a season-ending injury.

I wouldn’t give up on him just yet. He’s a lot younger than Streit and hopefully will come back better next year with a full off season of rest. He worked his ass off just to be ady for this season, and it appears he still could’ve used some more time to recover.

Contributor for Lighthouse Hockey. Definitely neither the Sniper nor the Enforcer.

by ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles on Feb 22, 2012 9:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not saying give up on him

but if they’re counting on him to play 20 mins a night against some of the best players on the other teams they are in trouble.

His decision making has been pretty bad for a while now (at least that I’ve noticed) which is at this point goes beyond any kind of injury “hangover”.

"It don't make you a bad person" - Ron Bennington

by Pauly C on Feb 22, 2012 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

glad someone else sees it.....

a-mac was never more than an ok 3rd pair d-man to me. he’s way overrated on this board.

and i think your being kind about streit. he’s just not that good anymore and the decline is only going to continue at his age

basically this team has one legitimate very good 2nd pair defenseman (hamonic) and nothing else. it needs a complete overhaul from top to bottom

by ripcurl2121 on Feb 22, 2012 10:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Classic line from Puck Daddy
In summary: The Colorado Avalanche may have just been involved in a three way, and didn’t notice one of the other participants were the Detroit Red Wings before they realized they were [expletived].

Bahahahahahaaaa

"...I was here on Day 1 when Garth decided to do the rebuild, and I really want to see it through." -- Frans Nielsen

by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Feb 22, 2012 9:25 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah I've stopped

commenting on the play of the Isles for the season.

"...I was here on Day 1 when Garth decided to do the rebuild, and I really want to see it through." -- Frans Nielsen

by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Feb 22, 2012 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Me too.

I continue to read LHH everyday, check in on the posts, and I watch what games I can, but I’m just letting the boys play out the string.

by Jones79 on Feb 22, 2012 9:50 AM EST up reply actions  

OT But a question worth posing

What are the chances we bring back Schremp during the offseason. He liked his time here, and I’m pretty sure so did the locker room and fans. He cant be worse than Rolston

Why yes, I do have a man crush on Bailey and Martin, and no, I don't care what you think about it

by DarthDoyle on Feb 22, 2012 9:48 AM EST reply actions  

Rolston doesn't enter into the equation.

Schremp was shipped (waived for nothing) because he wanted to play center. They certainly have enough LW’s in the system (Moulson, Grabner, Martin, Ullstrom) not to need another mid tier guy next year. His role would be fighting for a job with Bailey and reasoner, both signed for next year.
Considering they let him go for nada when the team could have used any bodies, there’s little chance they bring him back to compete with those two, and casey for NHl ice time next year. RSH’s islander career has passed, but I bet he comes back to the NHL at some point.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry I don't agree about RSH...........

He was and probably is still the type of player the Isle’s don’t need. He was a perimeter type guy who did not venture into the down deep area where good players need to go. Certainly he had skills that were best suited for the AHL and big Euro arenas where he has enjoyed a modicum of success. He was waived by every other team at the end and had lots of chances as a former first round pick [I spelled it correctly!] He really has lots going for him except heart.

by altosax on Feb 22, 2012 10:56 AM EST up reply actions  

What do you disagree with?

I don’t think I said anything contrary to your post, except that I think he might resurface in the NHL at some point. I don’t really think he’ll be successful in the NHL, but I’m sure that’s where he wants to play, and somebody might give him a shot if his agent pushes enough.
He’s not going to play for a Sutter team… but if he learns how to board smaller opponents (like Gerbe) maybe Pittsburg will give him a chance.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

No thank you

An inanimate carbon rod couldn’t be worse than Rolston so its not a great argument for bringing Schremp back. There are probably better pieces out there.

by GreekIsles83 on Feb 22, 2012 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

NYI Future Second-Line Winger

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 10:26 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

INANIMATE CARBON ROD

(a better player than Rolston).

At least ICR was employee of the month once.

by martylnd on Feb 22, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Squandered Opportunities

I may be in the minority here, but I thought last night wouldn’t have been so bad a loss in the following context: Flu ridden team, minus their number one goaltender, without coach is playing back to back games against a team that in theory should have been miles ahead of the in the standings, lose a center half way through the game and lose by a goal after some oustanding saves by Miller.

Instead what we have is a team that choked away an opportunity at home against a team that they were trying to catch, don’t score a goal for 5 periods, lose to another team below them in the standings after failling to prevent the opposing team from scoring within the first five minutes. If they would have at least showed up for Ottawa the Sabres loss is forgiveable, but they seem to let up at all the wrong times.

Maybe let up isn’t even the right phrase, maybe when the games are important we see what this team is capable of compared to the other teams. Maybe it is the other teams that are let down when they lose to the Islanders under normal cirucmstances. That is an even more depressing state, thinking they only win when the other team doesn’t care.

I’m not too disappointed though, I never thought they would be a playoff team, I hoped for a 10th place finish this season. Last year’s second half wasn’t that great, it was barely playoff bubble hockey for a couple of months. At this point I want the Islanders to win, but I want every West Coast team below them in the standings to go on a tear as well. Maybe even the teams below them in the East go on a winning streak too. Not the end of the world to get a top 5 pick, if you are only 5 points out of a playoff spot and everyone else is jammed in between you. I won’t root for them to lose, they need to win games otherwise there is no projecting that they will ever be better just by getting rid of old Devils.

Every time Mike Mottau plays defense, a snow angel gets its wings.

by Hockey1919 on Feb 22, 2012 10:00 AM EST reply actions  

They're tired and just not very good

Interesting quote from PA in the postgame:

“…it’s tough, you know, it’s a tough stretch, a lot of games here, a lot of players playing a lot of minutes…”

TOI for the key guys has indeed increased steadily all season. That’s how they managed to put a series of good games together, but it’s taking its toll it seems. Average TOI since the All-star break has been really high for the 1st line especially – JT (21:48), Moulson (20:55), PA (19:07). But it’s been high really since early December and they’ve all never played such a stretch with these kind of minutes in so many games.

Bottom line is they need to make sure to evaluate their game and their level very carefully. JT being asked to do everything and him being excellent indeed was a main source for their good play through December/January. In addition, they were fully healthy, had a rather favourable schedule, got great goaltending and some OT/SO luck. Unfortunately, not much of this is sustainable over the course of a whole season and the high TOI might as mentioned take its toll already. I’m often hearing, yeah, it’s fine, they’re an improved team, but I think Garth would do well doubting that. They’re not really a much improved team – despite the progress and excellent play of PA. Where are they without him? I hope we won’t find out so soon…

by BenHasna on Feb 22, 2012 10:04 AM EST reply actions  

They aren't much different than last season at all

They swapped out fourth line bodies for different fourth line bodies. I expected marginal improvement and no 21 game droughts. This year was supposed to be a year to hold on and hope the kids in the AHL can get a season under their belts. Next year will be a year of NHL rookies learning to get a year in the NHL under their belts and should be marginally better.

One of the few reasons I think Nino stuck was so that they had one less player next season learning at the NHL level. Eventually, there should be sufficient depth to either trade a pair of players for more skill or ride through injuries/fatigue etc with players of equal skill.

Every time Mike Mottau plays defense, a snow angel gets its wings.

by Hockey1919 on Feb 22, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

O-POZOing?

Is it me, or is Kyle Okposo doing the Blake Comeau-skate-around-the-net-with-the-puck-and-do-nothing-with-it move a lot more now?

by ChryWheatGod on Feb 22, 2012 10:35 AM EST reply actions  

My take

Losing your best goalie and your best defenseman in what is the most important stretch of the season highlights the biggest problems with this team. Without Nabby in to steal some games and Hamonic to play some competent D, the team is lost. We’re seeing the players who are talented but trying too hard (Tavares, Parenteau, Grabner, Nielsen) and the players who just don’t seem to give two shits (Rolston). There’s a major dearth of talent on this team and this defensive corps might be one of the worst that I’ve ever seen. I’m actually astonished that the team’s defense managed to get worse since last year, but that’s what happens when heavy minutes are relied on Eaton, Jurcina, and Staois.

Also, what the fuck is with the D pairings last night? What good does pairing Streit-AMac do when you’re left with Jurcina-Eaton and Staois-Ness?

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

Coaching

I know Cappy was sick last night but the biggest issue nobody is talking about is the fact we haven’t head a head coach worth a damn in years. We someone who can get the most out of his team and someone with NHL experience. Look at the coaches we’ve had over the last few years. These guys can’t take the team to the next level. With the talent on this team the lack of production falls directly on the coach. And steve staios. But mostly the coach. Snow needs to bring in a quality coach more than anything else this offseason.

by Niagara Islander77 on Feb 22, 2012 10:56 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Ted Nolan........

Guy always coached to win and maybe that is what ultimately got him canned. I remembered a refusal to play the younger guys out of him. I dont knwo the whole story there though. I dont knwo if anyones girlfriends or wives got involved or what. I wouldnt mind a coach with that mentality though. I guarantee you we’d see a lot less of certain players.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Nolan wanted to play with vets. Garth wanted to go into a full rebuild. Nolan wasn’t on board, therefore he got canned.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 12:16 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I really don't get this...

“Nolan wanted to play with veterans” meme.
What young players did he refuse to play?
Tambellini… wow… his father didn’t even give him a shot in the NHL.
Nielsen… 4 years ago Nielsen was not a better option than Mike Sillinger.
comeau.. He was up and down like a yo-yo, which probably turned him into the COZO.
I bet Nolan would do wonders with this team.
1. It’s a far better defense than he had. Would you rather have Streit or Poti, hamonic or Witt, Macdonald or Hill…
2. John tavares… who was his scoring leader… Jason Blake and Bill Guerin (year two). Do you want to compare those two dynamics.
3. Look at what Snow has done to the system in four years. We can really argue about who’s going to be where in this organization next year and beyond. In 2006 there was NOTHING in the system… there two best prospects beyond the ones I mentioned were traded for Ryan Smyth and NOBODY COMPLAINED.

Now if you wanted to change that to…
Nolan wanted to stick with a pre-lockout formual for winning, and Snow wanted to take the team to a more four-forward, smaller/faster dynamic… I’d buy into that..
… and can we agree that the islanders are starting to settle for a happy medium between those two dynamics going by the evidence presented on the last two draft strategies (more Hamonic, less Ness)

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Link

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

really not the point

unless you are saying that gordon was brought in to make sure they really sucked so they would get higher draft picks.
NO COACH would have wanted to coach the 2007-08 version, the 2008-09 version just got worse, and the only reason the 2009-10 version was WATCHABLE was because of John tavares somehow found some continuity with Matt Moulson.
If you can argue that the islanders tried hard enough to support the talent they did have on any of those teams I’ll stay here all day long to argue that they didn’t lift a finger to make those teams competetive. A FINGER!
Now they’re stuck with what they made. Bailey, Okposo, Niederrieter have become the PROCESS, rather than the EXCEPTIONS.
I can’t speak for Ted Nolan, but if I was brought in to make a WINNER, and I delivered one, then the circus that YOU created made me start from scratch again the next year… hell yeah, I’m not going to be a Junior/AHL coach for three years until I have even a sniff of talent.
That, to me, doesn’t read as NOLAN DIDN’T WANT TO COACH A YOUNG TEAM. that reads as NOLAN DIDN’T WANT TO BE THE FUCKING COACH AT MONCTON FOR ANOTHER THREE YEARS WHILE BEING PRESSURED TO DELIVER THE GOODS IN THE NHL.
That’s how you become a puppet (see Scott Gordon, Jack Capuano).
That’s how you get to be a guy who has to find a way to squeeze 15 goals out of Brian Rolston.
That’s how you get to be the guy who has to make an NHL defenseman out of Mike Mottau.
That’s why you see fans on this site saying that Jack isn’t an NHL coach… no he’s not… he’s a fucking AHL coach, just look at the ROSTER… AARON FUCKING NESS!!!!

A “young” team" is Colorado. A “young team” with budget issues is Carolina… A “young team” rebuilding is TORONTO.
Not that they are any better than we are right now, but they don’t throw up the white flag in October by trading for Brian Rolston to make the cAP FLOOR, or jay Pandolfo because he has a cap gap… or bringing up an elite prospect to play on the fourth line because he also has a cap gap.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Okay...

You either completely misread what I wrote, or you just don’t want to understand it. Gordon was a proven, successful AHL coach coming off in which he won the Louis Pieri Memorial Award for coach of the year – this meant that he had success with young players and would most likely be the Coach of the Future for Garth as the rebuild was underway in 2008. Fastforward two years to 2010 and Gordon was shitcanned.

NO COACH would have wanted to coach the 2007-08 version, the 2008-09 version just got worse, and the only reason the 2009-10 version was WATCHABLE was because of John tavares somehow found some continuity with Matt Moulson.

Agreed, I’m not saying the teams were any good – the Islanders haven’t been good since the 2007 season when they qualified for the playoffs and had an above-.500 record. It’s been last in the division every year since.

If you can argue that the islanders tried hard enough to support the talent they did have on any of those teams I’ll stay here all day long to argue that they didn’t lift a finger to make those teams competetive. A FINGER!

I didn’t try to argue that, so way to go.

I can’t speak for Ted Nolan, but if I was brought in to make a WINNER, and I delivered one, then the circus that YOU created made me start from scratch again the next year… hell yeah, I’m not going to be a Junior/AHL coach for three years until I have even a sniff of talent.
That, to me, doesn’t read as NOLAN DIDN’T WANT TO COACH A YOUNG TEAM. that reads as NOLAN DIDN’T WANT TO BE THE FUCKING COACH AT MONCTON FOR ANOTHER THREE YEARS WHILE BEING PRESSURED TO DELIVER THE GOODS IN THE NHL.
That’s how you become a puppet (see Scott Gordon, Jack Capuano).

Now that we’re using all caps, I’ll know that we’re serious. Ted Nolan was not Al Arbour, in fact he didn’t win shit when he was with the Islanders. He took a team with a little bit of talent (Alexei Yashin, Ryan Smyth), some overachieiving parts (Jason Blake, Miroslav Satan) and a goalie having a career year (Rick DiPietro with a .932 EVSV%) to a first-round playoff exit. Again, I’m not saying he’s not a good coach (he’d have to be to get a winning team out of the 2007 Isles) or that SNOWGORDCRAPUANO1 are better, I’m saying that, sometime in the 2007 – 2008 season, Garth Snow realized that he could not build a longterm winner keeping the team the way they were. The Islanders organization needed a rebuild because Mike Milbury left the team in utter shambles, and they needed a coach to lead that rebuild. Nolan didn’t want to be that coach, hence Gordon.

A "young" team" is Colorado. A "young team" with budget issues is Carolina… A "young team" rebuilding is TORONTO.

Colorado and Carolina are closer to the Islanders in rebuild assessment, although they have some more important parts already lined up (Stastny and young D in Colorado, Eric Staal and Cam Ward in Carolina) whereas the Islanders are still trying to answer those questions (Is the young D for real? Who is the long-term goaltender for this team? Are the young players at the NHL now for real?) Toronto has an assload of money and is a more attractive location for FA’s than Long Island, so I wouldn’t compare the Islanders to Toronto at all. I would say the Islanders rebuild is more comparative to Edmonton, though right now I’m feeling a little long-winded writing this out and don’t really want to expand any further on that thought.

Not that they are any better than we are right now, but they don’t throw up the white flag in October by trading for Brian Rolston to make the cAP FLOOR, or jay Pandolfo because he has a cap gap… or bringing up an elite prospect to play on the fourth line because he also has a cap gap.

This has nothing to do with my original point regarding Ted Nolan, but I figured we can’t go a post without bashing Rolston, so why not? He sucks.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

then I really don't know what your point was..

and I’m not sure you do either.
I said:

I don’t really get Nolan wanted to play with veterans" meme.

In the context of, he had a choice between a veteran team vs a team of young talent who just needed to be used more.
My point:
They had no young talent. they were at a stage where they HAD TO ACQUIRE young talent… not play it more. Who are we kidding with the Nolan left because he’d rather have Simon than Tambellini bullshit. Before he went batshit there were 16000 fans in the coliseum who would have rather seen Chris Simon than Jeff Tambellini… Chris Simon was actually a guy who this team hasn’t replaced since… Jeff tambellin was replaced four times since (Bergenhiem, Schremp, Joensuu and Niederietter). I’d take any one of those guys over Tambellini as a young winger. Matt Martin is just now becoming a Chris Simon-esque player… Physical presence that can contribute offensively.

and the only real truth we’ve uncovered in all this

This has nothing to do with my original point regarding Ted Nolan, but I figured we can’t go a post without bashing Rolston, so why not? He sucks.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

That's the problem though
In the context of, he had a choice between a veteran team vs a team of young talent who just needed to be used more.

I see what you’re saying, but I don’t think it was the case of the Islanders being so rife with young talent that the youth were playing out of their minds. Nolan complained about wanting some more scoring, and rather than use a 38-goal AHL scorer (who sucked at the NHL level, I’m aware), he instead relied on veterans like Chris Simon, he of the whopping 4-point season. Simon was also suspended a bunch that season for the Hollweg and Ruutu incidents, and it was clear that season that he just wasn’t an NHL player anymore. (Actually, looking at the roster for that season almost gave me hives. It’s really sad when I hope for a Richard Park-like season (12-20-32) out of Josh Bailey. Jesus Christ). Holy crap, that whole team was really terrible.

Nolan didn’t have the choice. It wasn’t an option left up to the coach at that point anymore. It’s the GM’s job to build the team the way he feels best for it to succeed, and that meant going with a full youth movement. Nolan was clearly frustrated with the make-up of the team and even called out Snow in the media asking for additional scoring. (“We don’t have natural 50-goal scorers. We have guys who work for everything they get. That’s the way we play.”) Besides that being kind of a dickish move from the coach to call his own GM out in the media like that, clearly Snow and Nolan weren’t on the same page in regards to the direction of the franchise. I have yet to see a successful NHL franchise that has such a rift between coach and GM.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

memory fades...

I know I don’t remember everything exactly like it happens, but let me clear up a few things you have forgotten:

Simon was also suspended a bunch that season for the Hollweg and Ruutu incidents, and it was clear that season that he just wasn’t an NHL player anymore.

2006-07 Chris Simon was one of the leaders of the club. I didn’t want Simon around in October, but by March I was a Simon fan. As a matter of fact in the Holleweg game he had scored the go ahead goal. He was the PHYSICAL FORCE they added to the PP when it was stalling. He was by no means, clark gillies, but he was something the team lacked to that point, and hasn’t found since.
His suspension for the Holleweg incident ended his season right after they aquired Ryan Smyth. If they lose Simon and don’t have Smyth they probably don’t make the playoffs. If they had both they would have had a better chance against Buffalo… not to mention losing the hill of performance enhancing drugs. The Isles were truly a circus act that year.
2007-08 is a different story for Simon. He comes back after a few remaining games left on the Holleweg suspension and is virtually invisible on the ice until the Ruutu incident. That effectively ended his Islander career… not Jeff Tambellini.
Nolan was clearly frustrated with the make-up of the team and even called out Snow in the media asking for additional scoring. ("We don’t have natural 50-goal scorers. We have guys who work for everything they get. That’s the way we play.")

This article was written after Nolan left (was fired? Whatever it was). I really don’t think that is completely on Snow. It’s a statement to the organization. Please remember the circus that Wang created with Neil Smith, who was probably against the DiPietro deal, and was probably briefed on the protocal of dealing with UFA’s which included having a board meeting instead of a one on one with each agent. Remember also that the Islander love affair with Pat Lafontaine ended over this as well. Pat had more loyalty to Niel than he did the Islanders. to be honest I don’t like Smith at all, but I had less loyalty towards Wang’s arrogant “we’ll do things my way” attitude than Smith’s “fuck this” attitude. You might want to look up a couple of ex-CA employees who were left his office after sweating out “sign this or leave” confrontations.
That’s a little of the “behind the scenes” that is public knowledge, but we seemed to have forgotten when it comes to why ted Nolan [may have] left.
There was something really cool going on, even with a shitty team, between most fans and ted Nolan… I can only speak for myslelf, but I liked the way he was trying to define the NY ISLANDERS.
I also like what Snow is doing. As a fan, I have little invested in the team. Their shittiness costs me little. As a coach, these last few years would have cost me endless sleepless nights, and constant aggrevation and self doubt. And for what? You read these comment sections… this is all “Crappy’s” fault. I know I was a continuous anti-gordon ranter. The difference is Capuano is an AHL coach of an AHL team that is trying to get an AHL team over the hump. he has succeeded to some extent where gordon just couldn’t get the support needed to do so.
But what will undoubtebly happen is that when this team is “ready”, probably after next year, other coaches, with more experience in getting veterans through a long season and prepared for the playoffs will start sniffing around for the opportunity to coach John 100PT Tavares, Matt 30G/5YR Moulson, Nino “the Swiss beast” Niederietter, Hamonic, Mayfield, Donovan, Strome, Bailey(?)… do you see what I’m getting at.
For Nolan in 2008 it was LOSE, LOSE, LOSE, LOSE, LOSE get replaced….Where is the “win” in that, when they had little ability to bring in support for the talent they were acquiring through the draft along the way. Maybe fans couldn’t see it that way, I couldn’t. But it had to be in big bold letters to a coach who was privvy to what was going on behind hte scenes.
There is another link in the article you posted. I saw that article, and even used it a few times. But there is a Scott Burnside article attached…. You don’t have to agree with much that he has written, but he did summarize that particular situation rather well. The Islanders made themselves into the consumate circus in 2006, mostly thanks to Wang. And they still haven’t dug themselves out… with the arena situation the way it is, maybe they never will.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think the initial idea that Ted Nolan is a legit coach has been proven through this argument.

He’s not any more legit than many others who have tried and failed. He got far once with Buffalo, and barely made it once with the Isles. (“Oh, but he wasn’t given much to work with blah blah blah.”) Face it, he isn’t what everyone believes him to be. Not a surprise in the NHL. DP isn’t what everyone initially thought he could be. How many other names could we list of players/coaches who never amounted to what everyone thought they could… daigle, scissons, jeff tambellini… the list goes on and on.

The Isles coaching woes won’t be fixed by retreading guys who have “kind of” made it once or twice in the NHL.

Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock...

by Turgeon1992 on Feb 22, 2012 6:14 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

And the by the way, Chris Simon had always been slow and stat-sheet wise, useless to the Isles.

He’s like a Brian Rolston who can fight. BOOM! Tied this post into Brian Rolston sucking.

Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock...

by Turgeon1992 on Feb 22, 2012 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

No, the sad truth is, Simon was more valuable than Rolston to the Isles

I wrote this on my old blog way back in July 2007.

The story, on ESPN.com: “Still-suspended Simon re-signs with Islanders”

Translation: The fans are sick to our stomachs.

NEW YORK — Chris Simon got a second chance from the New York Islanders.

The Isles are up the creek. They’ve had major personnel losses. Last season’s number two center has chosen to play in Russia with the exiled Alexei Yashin rather than return to the team.

The rugged forward [cheap-shot artist], still serving a [too-short] record 25-game NHL suspension for [an ambush] a two-handed, swing-swinging attack against the Rangers’ Ryan Hollweg last season, re-signed with the Islanders on Monday.

Simon missed the final 15 regular-season games in the Islanders’ late push to the playoffs and the entire five-game loss to Buffalo in the first-round postseason series.

The Islanders missed Simon, his grit, his leadership, his measly 27 points…

Had New York advanced further,

Pigs with monocles and top hats would have flown out of our bums.

Simon could’ve completed his suspension in the playoffs. But since he hadn’t missed a total of 25 games, the remaining five carry over to next season.

Game Six is Saturday, October 13th, in Philadelphia. Those cats will eat him alive.

The ban was the longest in terms of games missed in NHL history.

Gary Bettman was too gutless to ban Todd Bertuzzi for a full season, at minimum; then the lockout kept him from having to make this, among many other tough decisions.

Marty McSorley was suspended 23 games in February 2000 for knocking out Donald Brashear with a stick-swinging hit. NHL commissioner Gary Bettman stretched that punishment to one year, and McSorley never played in the league again.

Of course, it was easy to ban McSorely at the very end of his career; consequently it had no sting in it. Someone can ask Ryan Hollweg or Steve Moore how much impact that’s had on future incidents.

…“I take a lot of pride in being an Islander and I didn’t consider playing anywhere else this season but on Long Island,” [Simon] said in a statement.

“I can’t believe they want me back after this. Nobody else would have me.”

“Everyone knows the respect I have for [coach] Ted Nolan, but it goes well beyond that.”

“I respect Ted so much I publicly embarrassed him and our franchise.”

“Everyone connected with the Islanders, from the owner to the fans, have been first-class.”

“Except me. Hopefully we’ll forget that it ever happened, at least until the next joker comes along to get me off the hook.”

“I cannot wait to get the season started.”

“But I may want to skip anything in Madison Square Garden. I mean, it wouldn’t be fair to the guys if the fans just booed me all the time and didn’t get to them eventually.”

… Simon had 10 goals and 17 assists with a plus-17 rating in 67 games.

In other words, the Islanders can’t do without him defensively, even if they preferred it that way. Even with him they were in the bottom five in the league in shots allowed per game.

“Our staff was unanimous in wanting to bring Chris Simon back,” [GM Garth] Snow said in a statement.

“Ladies and gentlemen of the press, we’re over the barrel.”

“He’s an outstanding leader, and year after year he contributes on the offensive end.”

“Hey, 27 points is contributing! I know that’s like one month for Sid, whaddya want from me? Maybe he’ll catch lightning in a bottle again and light it up like in ’98.”

I know. I shouldn’t be bitter, right? And in the long run, it’s hard to see if he can repent if he never gets an opportunity. I’m just a little rattled … Simon’s had six suspensions. I can understand how Ted Nolan would want him to have another chance, since he himself spent ten years inexplicably blackballed from the NHL. Those are high dues, and he’s made them count by turning in the fine work he’s done with the Islanders. Snow, too, after watching the mass defection on July 1, has gotten the team together.

Let’s say that I’m hoping this turns out better than I fear it will, for Simon and the Islanders. If he can truly show that he’s not the same guy who tried to behead Hollweg, then I’ll come back to this space and I’ll say so.

Note: I never had to go back to that space and say so. In fact, five months later I had to write a post about the Jarkko Ruutu stomp, which sadly is not a Led Zeppelin song.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Feb 22, 2012 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I was unfair about Simon's stat-sheet.

He was productive in certain years, though not many of those as an Islander. Really he had 1 productive and 1 unproductive. http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=4962

Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock...

by Turgeon1992 on Feb 23, 2012 12:07 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I think my IQ just went down 10 points

by reading this. And that’s dangerous… because I don’t have too many to spare before I become a Ranger fan.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 8:37 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I guess *zinger*

Thanks for upping the intelligence of the previous post.

Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock...

by Turgeon1992 on Feb 23, 2012 12:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I should've specified

I was most definitely talking about Simon’s role on the team for the 2007 – 2008 season, not the season before that. The 2007 Simon had a role on the team and he played it. The 2008 version, however, was really troubled and it sucked to see him struggle like that. Holy shit, I would sign up for the 2007 Chris Simon again over the 2012 Rolston any day of the week.

And yeah, I remember the 2006 offseason quite well. Thankfully, there hasn’t been much Wang interference since then and we’ve seen some well-regarded players say good things about the organization. The only way to break that perception of the team is to win win win. I’d much rather trust the word of John Tavares over Scott Burnside any day of the week.

Also, I was a really big fan of Ted Nolan. I think it was great that he managed to turn a pretty bad team into a playoff team. The guy was a hell of a motivator, and I don’t remember too many nights of players acting as “passengers” and “playing a good game” despite a blowout loss. I absolutely agree that Nolan would do wonders with this team, but that’s just a hypothetical situation.

That’s what really frustrates me about Capuano this season – he managed to turn a team in 2011 that, on paper, is way worse than the 2012 Islanders into competitors while this season’s team continues to underperform. Down years from Okposo and Grabner and over-reliance on washed up veterans sunk this team. If Capuano can escape this season with a .500 or better record, I’m willing to bring him back. If not, I’m on the “FIRE CRAPUANO!” bandwagon.

It’s funny, we as Islander fans usually want the same thing for the team, yet we find endless things to argue about. I’m hoping the team puts up some good performances in the next week, because LHH has been an unbearable bitchfest recently due to this team’s crap performances. (I’m not blaming anybody for that bitchfest, because I’ve definitely partaken in it the past few days) Anyway, onwards and upwards, as they say.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

i think Capuano's 1st season is so misinterpreted....

i dont think he turned anything around. OTL included he coached the team to a 26-39 record. I just dont see where all this praise is coming from. The only thing Capuano changed was that he was the complete opposite of the tight ass Gordon. Now we still have that loosy goosy team with no accountability.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 8:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I tend to give that team the benefit of the doubt

just for even making it to an OT/SO so many times.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 23, 2012 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

We bitch...

because we want change. That’s just the way it is.
The team is actually better than last year’s version, but you can make an argument that almost every roster move they made backfired. I’m not saying that every one did backfire, but there is an argument.

Rolston… there was really no argument for it. Rolston probably cost them comeau (not a great loss as they obviously had no plans for him in the future). But a monkey should get double digit goals in that situation… hell, his predecessor got 24 and there’s some people here that thought a monkey would have been a good replacement for him. 10 goals from Rolston this year probably nets them 3 more wins. We’re not having this conversation.

Pandolfo… Pandolfo has been a trooper. But he cost them asses in seats, because if Haley had 40 starts we can pretty much guarentee they may not have won more games, but they’d have been more exciting to watch.

Nino… how can you promise “playoffs” when you have your coaching staff and team leaders teaching NHL hockey 101. If they do the same thing with strome next year you know the organization is BROKEN.

Reasoner… In theory, the best off season move… the fact that he gets Pandolfo and Niederietter in his infancy is probably the worst part of it all… we’ll see next year.

Staios… very much like Pandolfo, but in his case you might have wanted to retain Hillen for depth… probably a wash.

Mottau… why did they wait so long, and why in Bossy’s name would they ever bring him back rather than give other AAAA players a chance to earn a spot on next year’s team.

Weight… why is he behind the bench?

Capuano… I’m going to have to channel Tuna on this one. If you want him to do the cooking you at least have to let him go to the grocery store. This is not year one of the rebuild. If we are going to call him out on roster moves, then I want to hear a public statement that states that cappy signs off on this… because if he is playing Brian rolston with Josh Bailey without being pressured by Snow… he needs to go.
I really can’t help but think that the Brian Rolston deal is the most costly error in the 2011-12 season.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I think this needs to be addressed as well...
Who is the long-term goaltender for this team?

Do you remember the ruckus created when Nolan decided to go with Dubie over DP?
there’s another reason a real coach doesn’t want to be associated with this team. A 15 year mediocre goaltender who dines with the owner is not where you want to be. He already went through the battle with a far better goaltender in Hasak…
I’d have sat Dipietro for a month just so they’d fire me and i could collect that third year for sitting on the beach.
Here’s a nice way to re-start your coaching career.
They hire you… then they hire your boss… then they tell your boss, well… when you make any decisions you have to go through the old boss, and 10 other people… so he quites and your new boss was your backup goaltender… and he can’t do anything because no agent wants to deal with him and the 10 other people… so you got shit… well… except the face of the franchise… RICK DIPIETRO.
Hell yeah… sign me up for summa dat!

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah I do remember that.

It was stupid, and it was a case of DiPietro’s ego clashing with Nolan’s ego, making the whole team look terrible. That was a really, really bad team.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you remember the ruckus created when Nolan decided to go with Dubie over DP?

No, but I do remember the Rags-owned media and the Isles usual DQ trying to MAKE it a big issue… then the rest of the media followed suit.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Feb 22, 2012 10:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t agree with the original sentiment that started this either, but I will say with regard to this

I bet Nolan would do wonders with this team.

The guy hasn’t worked since. I kind of doubt he could work wonders anywhere, otherwise he wouldn’t be in Latvia.

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't buy that...

there is definitely a network. there are guys in junior and the AHL that would be great NHL coaches, but they are the minority, and most of them will get opportunities eventually.
Nolan has gotten two opportunities, and has delivered twice. Then he asked for more, and both times he screwed the pooch. I just think that owners and GMs will exhaust those other resources in waiting, their “network guys” and the standard retreads before they will give Nolan another opportuinity. That doesn’t mean he isn’t a very good hockey coach.
I liked the guy as the Islander coach. I like what Garth [for the most part has done], but I’d much rather have a ted Nolan coaching my NHL team than Snow as it’s GM.
That basically comes down to:
Chris Simon (bat shit) vs BRIAN ROLSTON (worthless shit)
Chris Simon, before completely losing it, probably would have crawled under the coliseum to defuse a bomb for Nolan.
Brian Rolston won’t carry the puck into the offensive zone, unchecked, for his $5M.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Nolan has gotten two opportunities, and has delivered twice.

I know we’re Islander fans, but we’re going to call a 4th and 5th place finish “delivering?” That’s a low, low bar.

Hey, maybe Latvia will win gold in 2014 and he’ll be able to choose any NHL job he wants. But I think when you have to go there to find a coaching job, there might be a reason.

I don’t have anything against the guy personally, but I don’t think he’s some sort of coaching magician.

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 2:44 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

yeah...

he took two different teams to the playoffs. I would stake my life on the fact that Scott Gordon wasn’t taking the 2006-07 players to the playoffs. First off, Witt and Simon woould ahve beat the shit out of him. And most likely Mike Sillinger would have uncovered the “beanpot shuffle” video and played it in one of his video sessions…
right there… ALL RESPECT LOST.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn’t say he wasn’t better than Gordon. But that’s not really saying much at all. He’s marginally better than terrible.

But again, are we really putting a lot in the 07 playoffs? That was one of the most improbable and lucky runs I’ve ever seen a team go on, from Blake’s 40 to Duby’s poke check. And after limping into the postseason on a 6-8 record, the Sabres took them out easy in the first round. This is great because?

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

who said "great"...

STOP MOVING MY CHEESE!

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Ted nolan was GM of the Rochester Americans before going to Latvia

The team was a shared affiliate of Buffalo and Florida at the time; I think he lost his position because Florida ended their affiliate agreement and Terry Peluga bought the Amerks at the same time as the Sabres, making Darcy Regier the de-facto AHL GM as well.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Feb 22, 2012 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry

I meant worked as a coach. Should have been more specific.

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

with those teams i would say he delivered....

He coached well structured teams who competed for every inch of ice. Thats what you ask for in a coach. Personal issues aside, the guy is a great hockey coach.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

My mistake, afro

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Feb 22, 2012 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Nah

being overly brief is one of my many flaws. Along with being a jerk, smelling bad, and loving the Islanders.

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually....

we had a coach worth a damn named Laviolette… However, MM the dumbass deemed it more important to keep Yashin happy than his head coach.

Isles rule, rangers suck... that's just how it is.

by Timtropolis on Feb 22, 2012 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it was Yashin and DP

Both wanted a trapping system… the only thing either one of them accomplished was trapping the islanders’ payroll.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

really...

blake had a say in it… Jason Blake…. who was created by the low cycle of high heeled bates. I’d like to see the article that references that.
I can go with the Peca/PL relationship theory… but if Milbury fired a coach that got them to the playoffs twice based on anything Jason Blake had to say i’d have to hear that from Milbury so I could start a never ending stream of laughter… and by “never ending” I mean I’d have my loved ones install an intercom in my casket so others could enjoy my laughter.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

This is why Charles Wang is a nightmare owner.

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

He's the only owner who is keeping this team on Long Island.

Any other buyer is not re-upping the lease and is moving the team to “greener pastures.”

Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock...

by Turgeon1992 on Feb 22, 2012 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Bottas talked about it before.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Feb 22, 2012 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Ain't that the truth

Isles rule, rangers suck... that's just how it is.

by Timtropolis on Feb 22, 2012 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

agree with both a mixed bag of Fab and JP's assesments of the situation..........

That quote from Snow that the team was underacheiving and he thought they were a playoff team is laughable to me. He said the same thing about this years squad, so either he’s saying what he has to say or hes not as smart as i would like to think he is. It sure would be nice though to have a coach now that preached this philosophy, "We don’t have natural 50-goal scorers. We have guys who work for everything they get. That’s the way we play."

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

AMEN
That quote from Snow that the team was underacheiving and he thought they were a playoff team is laughable to me.

We made it to the playoffs because of miraculous poke check by an absurd hero. Those seasons aren’t made by teams that win championships, they are made by men who win battles!

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

thats why i preach for more of that in this lineup....

I think we have players with equal talent to those teams, and the current players will easily surpass that teams talent level if not so already, but we are lacking those “battle” type players. Konopka was nice, but a guy with his battle level and Moulson’s hands would be nice. They dont need to be a complete package. Guys like Eric Cole, Tuomo Ruutu, Scott Harntell, Zach Pa….ok ill stop. I want to see a player of that nature in this lineup. We have playmakers in JT, PA, JB, FN, okposo is in between, not sure what to call grabner right now. We dont have much finish and grit. I believe if we add that element things will open up a lot on the offensive side of things. If you give Bailey, Nielsen and PA guys who can make some room for them, win them the puck and finish when they receive passes the whole complexity of this lineup will change. Im hoping Nino develops into one of those types of players but he isnt there yet.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed...

but on a slightly different level… they don’t need konopka type guys… they need Okposo to play like Parentau when it comes to growing a pair.
They need Bailey to find his “pair” as well.
Macdonald plays with it… but there are just too many “passengers”. Martin gets in a scrum… but then you have the five million dollar man who acts like a cop with three days left to retirement. I really think the only reason that Rolston hasn’t had a career ending injury is because other players pity him.
When was the last time he took a hit to make a play. It’s not like he isn’t CRUSHABLE… look what happened to Pandolfo yesterday… finally, somebody didn’t get the PITY MEMO… because buffalo is even worse shape than us.
Hopefully guys like Nelson, Nino, Lee, Petrov and the likes will give them size and will play with some stones… and you’ll forget all about Zenon Konopka.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

yea i agree.....

i dont think Konopka is the answer. Konopka was popular here because he was one of the only guys we had who played that way. Now that he’s gone (and Haley) we have even less of it. So i think when people cry for Konopka, they are crying for his battle level and balls, not a 4th line fighter. I want Okposo to play like the Okposo i saw when he first came up. Not this 2nd line checking forward who doesnt check that he’s turning into. I just think we need a player like that in our top 6 who is capable of producing as well.

by LaFontaine16 on Feb 22, 2012 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Why is Wishart......

up, but scratched each night? Certainly he can’t be worse than the Staios/Eaton/Mottau crowd that is doing less than nothing.

by altosax on Feb 22, 2012 11:00 AM EST reply actions  

I'm beginning to think maybe Ty isn't any good.

Is it possibel he really is worse than Staois/Eaton/Mottau? I havent seen enough of him, but apparently everyone else in the organization has or they are saving him like fine china for a special occasion.

Every time Mike Mottau plays defense, a snow angel gets its wings.

by Hockey1919 on Feb 22, 2012 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

He's yet to impress me.

The sample is small, and I’m sure he still needs to adjust, but he’s looked more like a liability than anything to me. In a handful of games, Ness has impressed me more than disappointed. Between this year and last, Wishart hasn’t impressed me once.

by Les Beaver on Feb 22, 2012 11:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree, I thought Wishart looked better at the end of last season

but he didn’t wow me then either. This season in an even more limited sample size he’s looked worse. Prior to the start of the season, I had hoped he would be a top six defender, based on the fact htat I thought he would get better than marginal.

Every time Mike Mottau plays defense, a snow angel gets its wings.

by Hockey1919 on Feb 22, 2012 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

It is not possible

If he can breathe he cannot be worse. He may not be better; that only time will tell.

by martylnd on Feb 22, 2012 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Most likely....

they had a deal in the works for eaton, or they didn’t think they’d get much out of Ness.
Neither turned out to work out as they expected.
Wishart is in limbo because they can’t send him back without putting him through waivers. fornabaio confirmed a couple of weeks ago that they are using him in all situations in BPT and the organization still has faith in him (after I badgered him for a few minutes).
I still think he will replace [most likely] Eaton in the next few games and get a big chunk of the playing time going forward.
I’m really not sure why people are less impressed with him this year as compared to last year. He was never really physical, and he didn’t make any huge mistakes in his ONE GAME. Were you expecting Paul Coffey? He’s probably going to be a 5/6 guy for them next year unless a UFA signing pushes him to 6/7 status.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Wishart is in limbo because they can’t send him back without putting him through waivers.

Not if he was up for an emergency.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Feb 22, 2012 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

by all reports...

Ness got the “emergency” tag. I don’t think you can constitute an “emergency” and sit somebody.
I agree, it doesn’t make any sense, because ness wouldn’t have warranted waivers either way. every time I’ve asked, I was told that Wishart would require waivers to be sent back.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Interesting, now that we've gottn the explanation...

after all the complaining and complaining and complaining by various people, how the Isles NOT playing Wishart except when they needed to is the very thing that prevented him from having to go through waivers. Maybe Snow isnt the stupid fucking moron asshole for not playing him enough to trigger waivers!

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Feb 22, 2012 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Doubtful.

He just got lucky.

Lolz

Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock...

by Turgeon1992 on Feb 23, 2012 12:10 AM EST up reply actions  

I think I'm going to check out a Bridgeport game soon.

Would definitely be more exciting than an Islanders game.

I would love to see PA back with the team because it is improbably anyone else comes along who will put up 42 assists—even combined….

Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock...

by Turgeon1992 on Feb 22, 2012 11:22 AM EST reply actions  

ROLSTON

1st period interview, he actually winked at the camera… clearly he’s there to give that 110% effort…

then, hey, my stick! my stick! – what’s that? the other team is going that way 5 on 3 vs us… ok, ok, give me a second, i just gotta get that stick… DW just gave me it for my BIRTHDAY!

These comments crawl up from the depths of the deepest Chasm of Saar

by bob l on Feb 22, 2012 11:57 AM EST reply actions  

Tim Wallace on waivers and Wishart returned

I thought Ty had to be placed on waivers too?

UVa Student. Twitter: @ericdavidmorris

by edavidmorris on Feb 22, 2012 12:15 PM EST reply actions  

Off Topic: COACHING 101

Dale Hunter is upset that Roman Hamrlik is not playing well defensively. Again, Roman Hamrlik.

Stephen Whyno @SWhyno
Hunter on why Hamrlik out: “You want him to be a defensive defenseman. He’s giving up too many chances, so he’s out of the lineup.”

I know he hasn’t played in the NHL in a long time. But is it possible that Hunter has no idea who Hamrlik is?

"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science

by PGI on Feb 22, 2012 12:31 PM EST reply actions  

As much as I hate Alexander Ovechkin playing like shit

watching the Washington Capitals sink like a stone has been an absolute delight all season.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 12:33 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

No, Hunter should know who Hamrlik is

Not only did their careers overlap for seven seasons, but in six of those seven, they played in the same division.

Head-to-head, Hunter actually owned Hamrlik: in 24 games he had 2g, 17a, and was +6 with 37 pim. Hamrlik had 4g, 3a, was -11, and racked up 70 pim. They never met in the playoffs. If this season keeps going as it has, that streak will continue.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Feb 22, 2012 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Fun with Greenberg

Hamrlik is the third highest ranked player on the Caps in scoring chance differential on the season. Sort by the +/- column. Hunter is going to get fired in Washington…and it’s coming real soon.

Today, Ovechkin left practice after 8 minutes with “not feeling good” “lower body injury” and “not sure”. I’d almost be willing to bet he was sent away from practice or something.

Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Feb 22, 2012 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Hunter is going to get fired in Washington…and it’s coming real soon.

You think? He should, but you’re talking about a team that fired a good coach because his player was unhappy. I think GMGM is going to go next if someone goes.

Sending OV off for being lazy at practice is exactly why I think they brought Hunter in btw.

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 2:55 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, probably not

He’s like a sunk cost/admitting a terrible mistake issue now. Tough to get rid of a “hero” (vomits), but I really don’t see what other choice they have. That team is going to quit on him real soon. He sucks.

Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Feb 22, 2012 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I can't believe this is going to come out of my mouth

A half season is not enough to say that Dale Hunter sucks at coaching. (We have much more of a sample size with regards to his chosen method of play.) He was an excellent and well-regarded juniors coach, after all. I think the NHL requires him to change the approach that made him such a success with prospects, and he hasn’t done it yet. It’s not unreasonable to think that he could… but he is probably a poor fit for a team with a diva problem. Had he been less insanely-focused on eventually being the head coach of the Washington Capitals, he could have easily gone to a young rebuilding club and done a fine job.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Feb 22, 2012 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

The reason I think he sucks

is because it seems like he’s alienating his players and there have been some quotes that have hit the media that probably shouldn’t have about benchings and the like…also, Olaf Kolzig calling OV out had to have Hunter’s fingerprints all over it.

I’m not even saying in an X and O systems way…his people management seems to be lacking. On top of that, he’s got a veteran laden, high profile, unmovable asset team of guys over there. He’ll be the first to go, not OV, Backstom and Green.

Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Feb 22, 2012 4:35 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

But remember

the thing that got Boudrea fired (in addition to them losing a bunch of games when Vokun was playing god-awful), was when he benched OV at the end of that game, and OV was cursing him out on the bench. Everyone said Boudreau was too nice to the players in the beginning, and now he can’t be tough on them because they won’t take him seriously. Hunter seemed to be someone addressing that specifically with his hard-ass reputation.

I honestly wonder if they’re going to end up cutting ties with OV at some point, although with that crazy contract and declining play, you wonder how much they could even get for him at this point…

by afrosupreme on Feb 22, 2012 5:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I think if the Caps miss, GMGM is a goner too.

And Hunter. Which will be quite pleasant. I’d be happy if he didn’t make it to the end of the season, but I’m sure they’ll let him ride it out.

by Les Beaver on Feb 22, 2012 3:45 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Though in fairness to George McPhee

Ted Leonsis is looking a little more Steinbrenneran every day. If he sacks GMGM just because of an off year, I think he’ll have made a mistake. The guy addressed his team’s major issues over the offseason, only to see all new ones jump up.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Feb 22, 2012 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't disagree.

I do think that having all of that talent and still missing the playoffs will be an embarrassment to be addressed. Not saying it’s right, I think GMGM has amassed an impressive (though slightly overrated) team. Also, I’ll be said if he goes because I quite enjoying typing GMGM.

by Les Beaver on Feb 22, 2012 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Fuck!

Ovechkin really wants to do everything in his power to destroy my fantasy team, doesn’t he?

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 3:02 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

good stuff - look at Semin

He has by far the best scoring chance +/- at +34. Ovechkin is just even at 0.

I agree that Hunter is a disaster for the Caps. And Boudreau has turned the Ducks around. Boudreau is a good coach. Hunter should be fired immediately.

by TMS71 on Feb 22, 2012 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

In the immortal words of Silky Johnson

My feelings on Dale Hunter: “I hate you. I hate you. I don’t even know you, and I hate your guts. I hope all the bad things in life happen to you and nobody else but you.”

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 5:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh Well

We have a pacifist front office a pacifist team on the ice and apparently, judging by the commentary on this site throughout the year, a pacifist fan base. The results of this toxic mixture will be a front row seat in front of our TV’s, watching teams who are willing to hit, stand up for themselves and God forbid, even intimidate once in a while, fight for the cup. Any islander forward, not named JT,Moulson,PAP,KO or Franz should be replaced by someone who doesn’t get nauseous at the site of blood!!

by Howat on Feb 22, 2012 12:49 PM EST reply actions  

FranS. No "z".

Nothing personal, I just cant believe even after all these years how many Isles fans continue to spell this mans name wrong.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Feb 22, 2012 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

You mean to tell me it isn't

Franz Neilson?

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Feb 22, 2012 1:33 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Well

at least you spelled it right.

Neil Smith @bigdealneil94 @KeithLHHockey @craigjbutton hey keith GFY
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Feb 22, 2012 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

w00t w00t

Hamonic and Nabokov on the ice. Hamonic is sporting a full cage. #isles http://instagr.am/p/HURNzSEw2I/

Why yes, I do have a man crush on Bailey and Martin, and no, I don't care what you think about it

by DarthDoyle on Feb 22, 2012 12:49 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Nice

We miss you SO MUCH, Travis. You have no idea!

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Feb 22, 2012 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I helps if this team is for real.

If Parentau refused that deal, then I’d have no problem with him being ex-isled.
If the market says PA is worth $5M for 4 years, then so be it. We can’t say that it’s unreasonable if he gets it somewhere else.
But you can’t let somebody who has contributed for two years just walk without making a legit offer before the deadline. THAT is a legit offer, and one I don’t think any Islander fan would get down on Snow for offering.
the money won’t put them in jeopardy of scewing the team economy. Other salaries are in line, except for Moulson. (who may have held out for more, but would have been under HUGE pressure to put up those numbers without John tavares, maybe the best player he’ll ever have to his right).
The term is in line with what the Islanders can afford. That would carry him through the 2015-16 season. At that point your emerging stars are still in their ELC or RFA periods and you have a better perception of what this team has, and where its needs lie in the future.
If he’d accept that deal I’d like to see ink to paper tomorrow.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 5:44 PM EST up reply actions  

If the market says PA is worth $5M for 4 years, then so be it. We can’t say that it’s unreasonable if he gets it somewhere else.

Yes we can. Just because someone else pays that contract, does not mean it isn’t an unreasonable contract. Look at Jason Blake. His contract was entirely unreasonable given his history, age, etc. etc. Look at Scott Gomez. Look at Tomas Vanek. Those are other players with unreasonable contracts… unreasonable as in, they will never, never, never, never, never live up to the demands of the payout.

Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock...

by Turgeon1992 on Feb 22, 2012 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

logic time

P A Parentau = Jason Blake, Tomas Vanek and Scott Gomez
Okay… I’m wrong… let him go because turgeon1992 says it’s so.

$5M for 4 years doesn’t sound unreasonable at this point because it is in the ballbark. The circumstances probably put those kind of number in the ballpark. If you can sign him for less, great. that seems to be the standard right now, and it’s something they can definitely afford to gamble on.
He’s not a 39 year old bottom 6 LW who was waived by his former team twice.
He’s not a mediocre goaltender who hasn’t won a playoff series.
He’s not a russian center who was historically invisible at playoff time.
No, he’s the best RW on the team right now, and has been for two consecutive years. He’s reaching the age where he gets paid for the bus rides, the truck stop dinners in teh middle of the night and all those practices from when he 12 years old.
If that’s the price, and somebody is willing to pay it… it’s reasonable… or introduce Ryan Strome to the SAUSAGE FACTORY.

I believe in ELI! Go Blue!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Feb 22, 2012 8:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Huh?

Do you read what someone writes before posting or just begin typing figuring that you’ll figure it out or get a laugh through your ramblings?

Never once did I say let PA go, just pointed out that it wouldn’t be baseless to say a 4 year 19 mil contract is unreasonable. I guess if that is what the market says, then the Isles cannot stubbornly ignore the market. The contract itself may be unreasonable regardless of what the market says, though—that was my only point.

But, by all means, do whatever because turgeon1992 says it’s so.

Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock...

by Turgeon1992 on Feb 23, 2012 12:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Well the truth hurts

The truth is Snow screwed up. Signed Rolston, Eaton, and Staios. All they did was take three spots up for younger players and waste money. Cannot be a playoff contender with only one scoring line. Nabby and Parenteau should be signed already. Snow has to stop getting guys ready to retire. Their so far below the cap now. Yes they can still make the playoffs. They need at least 17 more wins. Reality, they finish no b etter than 500. Which is still a step in the right direction. I remeber when Yzerman needed help when he was Tavares’s age. Snow it’s time to find better supportive guys. Cut Dipetro as a total loss, buy him out of his contract! I do miss Haley and his tenacity, something the rest of the tea lacks except for Parenteua, Moulson and Tavares. Grabs, get over yourself and score on those break aways. There were 5 more wins out there if you had made the shot.

by Madswede-Turtledove on Feb 22, 2012 8:15 PM EST reply actions  

The truth is Snow screwed up. Signed Rolston, Eaton, and Staios. All they did was take three spots up for younger players and waste money.

Snow did not sign Rolston.
And they literally could not put “younger players” in there or they would have been below the cap floor. They needed to spend that much money, like it or not.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Feb 22, 2012 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Dont You Dare

Don’t you dare move or change your jerseys. Cannot keep buying changes every few years!

by Madswede-Turtledove on Feb 22, 2012 8:15 PM EST reply actions  


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip and shoulder surgery not required.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Being Reasonable About Garth Snow’s First Rounders
Billy_smith_si_cover_small
LightHouse Hockey game on!
Gigantor15_small
LHH Poster's 25U25 Consensus
Jt_small
The New York Islanders and The Rebuild

Recent FanPosts

Moulsondealwithit_small
Islanders Jerseys throughout history. Which is your favorite?
Jt_small
And With the Fourth Pick, The Islanders Select...
Warlord2_small
Breaking Down the Cloutier - Salo Fight
Dutchlogo_small
LHH off-season fantasy league
890_1__small
Expectations: Strome
Small
The Angstlander -- Inside the mind of an anxious Islanders fan (that means you!)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
What else is Russian sports media telling us?

  144 votes | Results

Isles Reading

Islanders Schedule

1979-80


May 24, 1980: Tonelli to Nystrom. At long last, the steady build of the New York Islanders from expansion doormat to surprise semifinalist to annual contender reaches the promised land: Buoyed by a late season trade for Butch Goring that gave the team the depth up the middle GM Bill Torrey had been seeking, the Islanders knock off the Philadelphia Flyers in six games.

The victory justified the faith in coach Al Arbour who guided them from their second season to their first Stanley Cup seven seasons later. The Islanders would not be the first expansion team to win the Stanley Cup, but they would be the only one capable of a dynasty.

1980-81


May 21, 1981: This time it was much easier. After falling to "only" 91 points in the 1979-80 season, the Islanders returned to their division title tradition, piling up 110 points -- a whole 13 points over second-place Philadelphia.

Between the quarterfinals (where they beat the upstart Oilers in six games) and the finals, the Islanders reeled off eight consecutive wins -- with a four-game sweep of archrival Rangers in between. As they defeated the Minnesota North Stars in five games for their second Cup, their goal difference in the final was a combined +10.

1981-82


May 16, 1982: Another year, another landslide title. The Islanders won the Patrick Division by a whopping 26 points over the second-place Rangers, and were seven points clear of their nearest competition for the President's Trophy, the still-not-quite-ripe Edmonton Oilers.

A first-round scare against the Pittsburgh Penguins turned in the Isles' favor thanks to John Tonelli's heroics, and a true dynasty was on its way: Past the Rangers in six games, then an eight-game sweep of the Quebec Nordiques and Vancouver Canucks to run away with the Stanley Cup.

1982-83


May 17, 1983: Not so fast, whipper-snappers. The Edmonton Oilers' steadily rising challenge for league supremacy took them all the way to the finals for the first time, where the New York Islanders summarily dispatched them in a four-game sweep. For the Islanders, the Dynasty was secured. For the Oilers, it was a powerful lesson in where talent ends and the demands of playoff hockey begin.

Four years, four Cups, 16 consecutive playoff series wins (a record that would grow to 19 until the rematch with the Oilers the following year). Mike Bossy scored 60 goals yet again, and Wayne Gretzky became acquainted with Billy Smith's crease.


Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Warlord2_small Mark D

Lighthouse_hockey_logo_2_medium_small Keith Quinn

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Hg_small Chris McNally

Master of FIGs and Power Tablature

Icon3_small ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein

71096_479208120482_1257968_n_small David Hanssen