To Win a Cup the Isles Need to Trade Mark Streit
According to the calculations here at Lighthouse, the Islanders can only afford 8 more losses the rest of the year to make the playoffs. I think we can all agree that is unlikely to happen so it is time to start looking ahead, and I'm not talking about next year. Someone made a point in an earlier thread how Garth has been very succesful at Plan A of the rebuild, stocking young talent, but has failed at Plan B, translating that into success at the NHL level. I think Garth has been too shortsighted when assembling the NHL roster and he needs to start looking to the years the team will really contend.
That means making roster decisions that will determine the makeup of the 13-14 roster. Looking at the roster and assuming another slow free agent offseason, the Islanders are unlikely to contend for a conference title next year. And if the team can not compete on that level, it is not prudent to make decisions that do not get them to that level. The goal is to win the cup, not compete for a 6-8 seed every year. Saying that, I do not believe next season has to be a total loss. The goal should be to make the playoffs, which could be realistic.
The team is bound to be better next year. The roster composition can not get much worse with the Islanders currently fielding 10 players at replacement level or worse according Hockey Prospectus's GVT and a putrid shooting percentage that should rebound even slightly. Add to that an improved defense through promotions and the team should be better constructed next year. Still, it will not be good enough to contend for a cup, which has to be the goal and driver of all roster decisions.
Operating under that premise, there's a few moves Garth must make this year to make the team better in the 13-14 season. A few are no-brainers, like getting rid of Pandolfo, Reasoner, Eaton, Mattau and Staois. They all provide little to no value now and most certainly will not be contributing or even on the roster in two years. All of their ice time should be given to players who need the experience to grow to be contributors in 13-14.
There are three players who I believe Garth must make a decision on by February.
Mark Streit-He will be 35 at the start of the 13-14 season and currently not playing at the elite level he established pre-injury. There is very little chance he will be worth his salary, and the responsibility that comes along with the salary at 35. It's also reasonable to assume he will continue to regress and no longer be a top flight defense next season. That is why Garth needs to trade him this year. When it's time to contend for a cup, a team can not be relying on a 35 year old Mark Streit. Also, he is the Isles best asset in terms of building a team for the future.
Evgeni Nabokov-He has been playing well and is not part of the team's long term plan. Whatever Garth can get in return, he should. Garth has had success receiving a compensatory draft pick based on playoff success, and he would be wise to do so again.
Milan Juricina-While asked to do too much thanks to our inept defense, he provides good size, and will only be 30 come the 13-14 season. Garth should lock him up for two years and hope he anchors a solid 5/6 defense pairing when the team is playing at an elite level.
Making these tough decisions, like to trade Streit, are the type that separate the great GM's from the mediocre. It's time for Garth to make the case for whether he wants to win, or merely wants to do enough to keep his job. For the sake of us all, I hope he chooses the former.
Submitted FanPosts do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog or SB Nation. If you're reading this statement, you pass the fine print legalese test. Four stars for you.
100 comments
|
Add comment
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
agreed that Streit shouldn't be anchoring the D in 13-14...
…or even next year for that matter (unless it really does take him this whole season to get back to form), but that doesn’t mean we need to trade him.
just because he won’t be the #1 D doesn’t mean he wouldn’t be better as a 3/4 or even a 5/6 Dman. You said to lock up Jurcina for 2 more years, and Streit/Jurcina as 3/4 next year (behind Amac/Ham) and as 5/6 in 13-14 is not bad. The key will be getting another really good pairing to fill out the D.
A trade is not a bad idea, but neither is keeping him and lowering your expectations/demands on him to a level more suitable for a guy who missed an entire year. I just feel that his worth as a better-than-average 5/6 D outweighs the lowball offers we would probably get before the trade deadline.
It’s kind of like Wisniewski – we traded for him, figuring he would have been either a second pair (or even third pair) D who got some PP time, which would have been good/consistent for his skill level. He was unfortunately thrust into being #1 and couldn’t live up to the responsibility/ice time.
Hamonic is the only D on the current roster worth locking up
AMAC is overrated, even though he and Streit are both coming off serious injuries that will probably take a year to get them back to form, i’d only trade Streit for the right return, and the best value for that is at the trade deadline, obviously, when teams will pay above market value. that said, Streit value probably will be better next season. the fact that he has one year left on his contract will be either a postive or a negative, depending on the potential trade partner at this deadline…if they want a cheap rental who can be a second pairing offensive D for the playoffs only, he’s the guy…but if they want a playoff rental only, the extra year would be a detractor….yet, in a different scenario, that extra year might be attractive…no doubt, Neilson will also be in the same kind of discussions, maybe even pap, but at this point, i am thinking resigning Pap is actually more important than the other two. in other words, i’d trade neilson or streit before pap, provided pap will resign of course, otherwise he is gone at the trade deadline too.
this is a solid draft year for D…some combination or one of Streit, Neilson and Pap should bring in a mid to late first round pick that will be a D, just like Edmonton moved penner, and part of the payback was the 26th overall pick that netted oscar klefbom, top swedish D who excelled at the WJC.
by CanadianIsleslifer on Jan 8, 2012 2:14 PM EST reply actions
it would have to be a very good offer
otherwsie I believe having some stability in a veteran on the D is good. I think we may be able to trade some D, Jurcina, Eaton, Mattou and get some return for them
Any task BIG or small, Do it well or not at all
I think we may be able to trade some D, Jurcina, Eaton, Mattou and get some return for them
I dont. They couldnt even get a bit on a 24G scorer, you think they are gonna get something back for those guys?
Maybe- MAYBE- Jurcina, if only because of his size… but he is the one out of that group I would like to keep.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Jan 8, 2012 2:33 PM EST up reply actions
i'd agree with that
jurcina will never play much more than 40 games a year, will never meet his potential due to health, i’d entertain resigning him as a 6th or 7th dmen, but mottau has no trade value at all, and there is nothing more then a faint hope that anyone would think staois or eaton was worth anything at the deadline, and even then at best your talking a 7th round pick.
by CanadianIsleslifer on Jan 8, 2012 3:35 PM EST up reply actions
Id like to keep him as a 6-7, too. Im not talking top four for Milan ideally. I just think that theres at least something there that makes it worth holding on to him- size and a hard shot. Its something.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Jan 8, 2012 11:10 PM EST up reply actions
IMO you dont make a habit of making guys Captain and trading them away.
It looks bad, its bad for the room, you just dont do it.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Jan 8, 2012 2:35 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
My comment below was supposed to be a reply to this
STOP effin' messin' with my FnGO!!
by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Jan 8, 2012 3:16 PM EST up reply actions
Is this so bad, though?
Disregarding the “C” for a moment, trading Streit could be viewed in a more positive light, don’t you think? As opposed to merely shedding an older player for draft picks, couldn’t it be viewed as giving a player in the twilight of his career (who still has something to give) a better shot at a championship with a contender?
Looking at it now, it seems less likely the Islanders can make a serious run for the Cup while Streit’s still playing. Cutting him loose and sending him to a contender could be interpreted less as an insult and more a nod of appreciation for time served and buying into a struggling franchise.
Hoping that Haley comes around more than once every 75 years.
If Streit were to request a trade, I might change my mind, but consider
(1) We’d need to take back salary
He has a $4.1 Million Cap Hit; we’d need to replace that to stay at the floor. Given that weère likely looking at pics and prospects as the big part of the deal, makes you wonder what kind of trash will we be taking on.
(2) How do we replace him?
What we`d get back would likely be prospects and draft picks. How likely is it that any of THEM would assist in any lind of challenge in 2013-14
(3) It smacks of giving up on the rebuild, a la Mike Mlbury. We owe JT better than that. We owe Streit better than that. We owe ourselves better than that.
Again, if he asks for a trade to a contender, then I think we owe it to him to consider it, assuming it can help the team.
I hate to say it, but Frans is a different creature. If he`s not signed long term by the deadline, I think we have to look at moving him.
STOP effin' messin' with my FnGO!!
by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Jan 8, 2012 5:17 PM EST up reply actions
but apparently there are no reprecussions if the team is under the cap floor
if it is a deadline deal, probably won’t have to worry about cap floor at all.
by CanadianIsleslifer on Jan 8, 2012 5:58 PM EST up reply actions
There are huge repercussions for being under the cap floor
a 1 million dollar fine and the loss of a first rounder.
The thing is that right now, the Isles are 4.8 million over the cap floor and by the end of the season, they are estimated to be 11 million over, so shedding some salary wouldn’t hurt them.
NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Jan 8, 2012 6:57 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
seriously?
b/c i’ve read on this site and elsewhere that there were not any reprecussions???
by CanadianIsleslifer on Jan 8, 2012 7:01 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah definitely
NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
Disregarding the "C" for a moment, trading Streit could be viewed in a more positive light, don’t you think? As opposed to merely shedding an older player for draft picks, couldn’t it be viewed as giving a player in the twilight of his career (who still has something to give) a better shot at a championship with a contender?
You cant disregard the C because it IS a factor in this. And Im sorry, but 33 is not the “twilight” of his career- the guy was drafted only like 7 years ago!
Looking at it now, it seems less likely the Islanders can make a serious run for the Cup while Streit’s still playing. Cutting him loose and sending him to a contender could be interpreted less as an insult and more a nod of appreciation for time served and buying into a struggling franchise.
The way I see it, the whole “time served” thing works for Iginla from the Flames, not for Streit from the Isles.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Jan 8, 2012 11:15 PM EST up reply actions
When he was drafted
doesn’t really have anything to do with what stage his career is in. What you said would apply to a player drafted at age 18, but not one drafted at age 26, like Streit was.
Streit's 34 and going to be playing most of his 1st UFA @37yrs old if we resign him, which would be the only smart reason for us to keep him.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
Yes, trades are often about perception and by being captain he is perceived in a better light.
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc
Co-Manager/Writer for Pinstripe Alley, Editor/Writer for Blueshirt Banter
"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."
"Every day is a great day for hockey."
To be perfectly honest, given our image everywhere in and out of the team. Trading away our captain(which we have done before recently), is the least of our problems.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
He shouldn’t have been named captain in my opinion, there were younger options that could fill the role for longer.
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc
Co-Manager/Writer for Pinstripe Alley, Editor/Writer for Blueshirt Banter
"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."
"Every day is a great day for hockey."
Plus this several times
When I made my posts in the threads about who should be appointed Captain last summer, this was my argument:
I have several criteria, in descending order of importance
Veteran presence — Someone who has been here long enough that he is associated with the team and can safely be said to have some investment in it’s future.
Part of (sorry) “Teh Core” — Someone who is probably going to be here for a while. I am tired to death of changing Captains every second season (or worse). Continuity is important.
Durable and Serviceable — Someone who we can be reasonably sure will be on the ice for a significant part of the game, and almost as important, someone who will be on the ice in significant parts of the game. Captain does us no good if he’s on the bench during that last minute scrum.
Leadership — Someone who will LEAD this team, by example, by threats and intimidation, by standing up to the other team, by putting our position forward to the referees and running interference with management for the other players in the Locker Room.
Experience — Someone who will not be distracted from the primary job of developing into the best hockey player he can be by having unnecessary extra duties dumped on him. Much as I love JT and MM, I don’t want them worrying about anything but scoring (and, hopefully, getting better on the defensive side of the puck).
There is another argument to be made here as well: What have we been crying for around here for three years, now? A decent top 4 defencemanas a Free Agent. And now we’re talking about trading away one of the few we have?
Someone needs to be a veteran presence on this team once it finally makes it to competitive.
Ummmm, no.
STOP effin' messin' with my FnGO!!
by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Jan 8, 2012 3:16 PM EST reply actions 6 recs
This post
Says it all, rec’ed!
"Line brawl på Long Island!? Matt Moulson i huvudrollen!!!?! Wot!?" SwedishIslander
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
The main problem I have with this is, who says that vet presence isn't requirable somewhere later? And for cheaper and in a less important role?
Not to mention, who’s to say that in 13/14, MacDonald(27 then) or Moulson(30 then) or can’t be that vet presence at that time?
I think vet presence is overrated honestly. The Nucks made it to the finals last year and I don’t think they had a forward or d-man older then 30 on their entire roster Let me check. 1, Salo. I think the whole “vet presence” thing is hugely overrated. I think “great”/“smart” coaching/teaching/guiding on the bench is supposed to do that, not “old” players.
Does anyone really think Rolston or Pandolfo are helping Nino with his game more than anyone other forward on the team? 2ndly, Hamonic didn’t have anyone other then A-mac to show him the ropes last year, and Hamonic turned out fantastic performance last year. I think this vet presence is extremely overrated.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
agree: vet presence overrated in this case
Before arriving here, Streit played almost 3 full seasons with Montreal
Total prior NHL experience before signing with Isles:
205 regular season games (Tavares has 200 right now) which culminated in 1 playoff game in 05/06 and 11 in 07/08 (1-3-4, -1). After which, Montreal let him walk. Unless the Swiss national team counts a lot more than i thought, he doesn’t add as much vet presence as some think/hoped.
No top-level FA is signing here to be paired with Streit, esp given his current performance level as Staple noted in Sunday’s article:
Streit, who hasn’t had an even-strength point in a month, has no goals in 23 games2-17-19 and -17 isn’t going to turn heads as a strong vet presence – or garner much worth on the trade market.
add in the goalie-go-round of the past & future, any big ticket UFA defensemen will look to sign elsewhere regardless of the money thrown at him. Streit does little to change that.
to the original comment:
Leadership — Someone who will LEAD this team, by example, by threats and intimidation, by standing up to the other teamthreats and intimidation doesn’t sound like Mark Streit or the Swiss way. Have you ever heard the guy even raise his voice? Make a mad face? Maybe he’s a beast in the locker room? doubt it.
Durable and Serviceable
still seems to be recovering from Sept 2010 injury. Hopefully, full recovery this summer and no World Championships for the Swiss team.
Part of (sorry) "Teh Core" — Someone who is probably going to be here for a while.
He’ll be here till the end of next season. His performance and contract negotiations will determine if he’s here longer. Not part of the Core (Tavares and Company) in my eyes. His value declines every month. Hope he fully recoups in the off season becuase this would be difficult to watch for another year.
That was my argument last offseason when everyone was saying we need vets
and I kept indicating that there are a bunch of guys on this roster with about 150+ games played. We have vets, they’re just young vets.
NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
We need Defenseman. period.
And I doubt the Islanders can afford to give any away. Streit even at his worst is still currently the Islanders second best defenseman. Who do you replace him with? You just don’t go out and find defenseman as easily as you find forwards, not this season, not in the off-season or even in two seasons.
If Streit is the Islanders 4th defender in two years at 4.1 Mil cap hit, that is steal and ideal spot. I like the re-build, but you still need some players in place. We get so caught up in “the core” that we forget the Islanders are a bottom 5 team and need actual hockey players at all costs.
by Hockey1919 on Jan 9, 2012 9:11 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I totally agree
Exactly. They’ve already lost way too many NHL players over the last few years. And I’m quite confident Garth has realized it and will be trying to hold on to Streit, Nielsen and PA as much as he can.
by BenHasna on Jan 9, 2012 9:52 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
$4mil isn't gonna be ideal if all he can put up is 40pts per year and be a +0 zero player against mid-pair competition while being used offensively.
Streit is the 34th highest cap hit d-man in the NHL, do you think he is playing like the 34th best player in the NHL?
The thing is, Streit doesn’t look anything more then an average offensive d-man now. 4goals/40pts is what he’s on the verge of producing while being used like an offensive d-man, 55% o-zone starts and 4min/gm of PP time=15th most among all nhl d-men. And if you look around stats from last year, that’s good for 24th-28th in the NHL last year in pts for d-men, and tied for 75th in goals. Meaning, Streit isn’t an elite offensive d-man any more. He’s likely barely a top offensive d-man on your average nhl team. You think we can’t live without him on the PP? A-mac last year in 3min/gm of PP toi was on the verge of a 6goal/36pts full season, a very solid fill-in for the PP. I think it’s more, you give a puckmover those PP minutes and favorable o-zone starts + toi total, and they will produce solidly no matter what. No, not everyone will be a 40pts d-man with 4min/gm of PP time, but they will be able to produce closer to that number then you’d think. Thus, Streit’s offense is more expendable then people think, especially at his age. Hell, Hillen was barely off the verge of a 30pts season last year with almost zero PP time.
And this is about the future, obviously it hurts us short term. Definitely this year, arguably next year depending on how ready DeHaan/Donovan are, even Katic to some extent too. But the real question is how does this affect us in 2yrs down the line? Can we trade for a "higher paid"/"overpaid d-man to replace streit’s mid-pair minutes? Probably. You say we got him for $4mil for 2yrs, that’s 4mil more we force garth to spend on a new player(s), and $4mil he likely will put towards the D. You take away the offense, and I think we can find a solid mid-pair $4mil/yr d-man somewhere or somehow. And certainly we can find one "as young as" or younger then 37yrs old Streit.
The thing everyone has to realize is this move is for long term, not short term. How many people think a 37yrs old Mark Streit is gonna be putting up 40pts seasons and not having brainfarts or slowing down much more then we’ve seen this year? Do we wanna take that chance? Do we wanna force ourselves into resigning him for money we’d like to spend elsewhere or extend on our youngsters? We have "Streit-esque" d-men coming up next year or the year after, why should we keep Streit around if we won’t likely need him by then?
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
So they're paying 5 years
for a number two really…the first two years he played like a #1, 3rd yr injured, and now he’s playing like a 3…seems to work out. There isn’t really much of a cap issue right now and truth be told, nobody in the system will be beyond their ELC by the time he’s ready to move on.
He won’t hurt this team at a 4.1 mil cap hit in 2014…and even if he does, BPT!
NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
lol, I'm just not sure what he's gonna turn into by 37yrs old and if he's gonna be an overpaid an underproducing or injury prone player once we extend him.
In the recent past, any d-man close to their mid-30’s for us, sometimes younger, seems to break down rather quickly and harshly.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
My guess
won’t be as bad as Mottau. I hear you though…I’m hoping that some of the kids start panning out, we can make a trade or land an FA before that…Snow can’t have that kind of drought for 5 years on D and still have a job (right???).
NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
Yeah, Garth has had a lot of swing and misses with d-men acquisitions hasn't he. lol
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
Don't be so quick to get rid of Garth's one bright spot, we could be getting more Staois/Eaton/Mottau replacements
for 24th-28th in the NHL last year in pts for d-men
and he is 34th in cap hit. Seems like a good return on investment to me.
I hear you, but it's really really really hard to find d-men worse then those guys have been this year again.
And if Garth did that, he won’t have a job much longer. I’m not arguing about his pts production now or later, just that it’s declining and he might not be anything more then a glorified bottom pairing offensive d-man in a few years.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
Yes, he is at least the 34th best defenseman that the Islanders can acquire.
There are about 240 defenseman in the NHL, I don’t think you can name 33 better even for the price , and this is the key point here, that are going to play for the Islanders any time soon.
At 37 Streit will not be the player he is today, but he won’t be Staois or Mottau either. Even if he is, you don’t always have to get an asset for an aspring asset, sometimes you use that asset until the very end. It is very easy to say what the Islanders defensive prospects project to be, but very few will meet that projection.
There comes a point where you need to build upon the teams depth even if it means keeping guys a little longer. I’m not syaing extend him for 5 seasons, just don’t be so sure that $4m in free space is going to translate into a better player.
He also
really played like a top 10 for two years though.
NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
2yrs is a lot of time. Streit for all we know may have deteriorated into an average at best 4.
The thing is, there are no uncertainty with players, older players especially. D-men for us break down bad for some reason with us in their mid-30’s and sometimes earlier. Yes, even if Streit decline somebit, he will still have his passing most likely. But he’s only gonna get slower, he’s only gonna get older, and his injuries/drastic slowing down will always be a question. Look at Pronger, look around the nhl and see how many 37yr old d-men are playing top 4 mins: Lidstrom/Gonchar/Salo/Pronger, and 2 of them are hurt and 1 is injury prone and the other is a 1 of the greatest d-men of all time. And look at their peformance, Pronger has slowed down skating and pt production but luckily still has his size/reach, Salo . It’s very rare to have a 37yr old d-man playing top 4 minutes, let alone maintaing high pt production. “Most likely at best, I think we could expect Streit playing 20min/gm and putting up ~30-35pts/yr while playing against bottom pairing d-competition and on the PP”. That’s not bad, but it’s not worth anything more then $2-$3mil/yr, which I’m not sure what we are gonna extend streit at if we have the option.
Everyone thinks, let’s run streit to the ground, but everyone doesn’t realize that what Streit will likely be at 37yrs old when we are a playoff is not something unfathomable at all for DeHaan or A-mac or Hamonic or Donovan to do 2yrs down the road. And even by this thinking, Streit is gonna be the likely 5th or 4th at best d-man on the team then while being overpaid and an injury concern. That’s why I think the best thing is to move Streit. He isn’t gonna get better, he is only gonna decline, and his value and importance to this team is only gonna drop. Everybody says Streit’s milage, and Streit’s importance, but the thing is he is likely gonna be one of the worst 3(possibly 2) d-men on our team by then, and he’s gonna be more fragile and he’s gonna be slower and he’s not gonna be making better decisions then he has this year. I understand if people want to hold onto him for “short term” because our D is barren this year and a bit weaker even next year without him, but with how your average offensive d-man declines, Streit isn’t gonna be a difference maker for us at 37yrs old, he’s likely gonna be one of the players we complain about ala mottau/staios/eaton now but hopefully not to that extent.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
Streit will get older, he will get slower and he is on the decline
That doesn’t mean he needs to be in a hospice either. At 37, he should be pushed out by younger and better defenseman, but we aren’t quite there yet and I rather hang on too long than “maximize” our assets when we still have no clue as to what we will have or what we are getting.
This team continually gets rid of hockey players that can actually play in hopes of picking up something better. Two season later they recycle that player for futures as well. At some point you need to retain actual hockey players and not have it be open mic night.
I know what you are saying, but down the line in a couple years, it's highly likely Streit isn't gonna be much more then a good bottom pair offensive d-man or a mediocre #4 d-man.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
That's a lot better than who we're playing now
by sayvillelax94 on Jan 11, 2012 12:08 AM EST up reply actions
Yes, but highly likely the 4th or 5th best d-man on your average playoff NHL team. Think Hillen.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
If Streit is...................
getting old, playing hurt, over paid, and past is prime, than we would be lucky to get a #2 pik who would take 3 years+ to develop into an NHL starter. If that is the case we may be better off keeping him like a hi mileage car and hope to get some more years out of him. The other choice would be a trade where both managers think they are out smarting their counterpart. Sometimes one side wins in those deals and sometimes both sides win, but often both sides end up with losers. Just saw the movie Moneyball and there is a lot of stuff that reminds me of the Isle’s dilemma.
trade deadline is always the best time
teams are willing to over pay
by CanadianIsleslifer on Jan 8, 2012 5:59 PM EST up reply actions
Streit
I’m not proclaiming Streit is past his prime, hence my desire to trade him now. Next year who knows. But it’s very doubtful isles win a cup with streit on the roster AND performing at a level.
A big jump between being in the botom five to being a Cup winner
Let Streit at least help them make the playoffs before we start planning a parade.
by Hockey1919 on Jan 9, 2012 9:12 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
again, exactly
I feel people sometimes think way too much about how to build a Stanley-Cup winner for say 2014-15. I’m sure the primary goal is just to be competitive again, make the playoffs, generate revenue, attract good players, etc.
by BenHasna on Jan 9, 2012 9:55 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
I'm all for asset management, but at some point you have to at least try to win a couple of games.
Get better, stop being a laughingstock, build depth, then add a couple of pieces through free agency. You can eventaully use cap space to bring in UFAs if the perception is you can win. If you continually sell off every player, you are left with a perpetual re-build as well and it becomes a self fulfilling prophesy that no one will sign here because they stink.
If Streit isn’t the answer then he won’t be of much value to anyone else and we are better off keeping him.
by Hockey1919 on Jan 9, 2012 3:54 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Tough call
I think if you’re in a vacuum looking ahead to the 13-14 season, trading Streit makes sense. However, I don’t think you can discount the repercussions moving him would have on next season. We already need to replace our bottom three defensemen (I don’t share your feelings on Jurcina, but I guess there’s a case to be made for him as a #6). Making it four would really be a difficult task. I think we’d take a pretty big step back in 12-13 without Streit, and you never know how that will affect the attitude and mechanics of a team.
The biggest problem is what we would really want to try and bring back in any trades we make is a young defense prospect who is close to making the NHL, and odds are a team would probably rather try and fit him into their lineup than trade him for Mark Streit. I guess in theory I could see a team making an offer involving a player like that for a package that had Streit and Frans in it, but again, that would be a monstrous blow to next year.
I don’t know. I don’t have a problem with them moving Streit in principle-captains get traded, it’s not that unusual. But it would have to put us in a position to at least tread water in 12-13 while gearing up for 13-14. We can’t afford to have next year end with a bottom 5 finish again.
The Islanders didnt win the Cup with Ed Westfall.
But does that mean they should have dumped him before that “while he still had value”? After all, the team didnt look so hot when he was first their Captain- a lot of growing pains and they werent winning. Right?
But that isnt the case in retrospect. The Isles dynasty players credit EW with helping them a lot… he helped mold many of them as pros. Who knows how things might have been without a good guy like Eddie helping them grow into the players they would become and get to where they got.
I am not saying Streit = Westfall… what I am saying is that you cannot discount a player just because you dont see them as part of a dynasty team years in the future. And it cannot be overemphasized that whats happening now is important- win or lose, it is whats shaping some of the guys who this team will depend upon for years to come.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Jan 8, 2012 11:26 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
For his first two seasons as an Islander, I will forever give my undying respect and admiration to Mark Streit
He was, literally, the only good player on the 08-09 team and one of two good players the year after (Moulson being the other one). Media laughed at Garth when he signed him and he turned in two team MVP seasons. He’s been nothing but class in his time here. I think last year goes very differently if he plays, more so than Okposo. In my estimation, his injury set the rebuild back at least one full year.
He’s either not fully recovered from his injuries or maybe it’s a mental hurdle, but he hasn’t been the same player this season. We can all see that.
I can see the logic in trading him to get back assets from a playoff team. I wouldn’t like it (I agree with TMC about trading captains. McCabe was the captain for 15 minutes before Milbury shipped him and Bertuzzi off for the ghost of Trevor Linden), but I could understand it under one condition.
That asset must be an NHL-ready high-end prospect that can step onto the ice right now for the Islanders, or there’s no deal. No picks, no projects. Someone pr*j*ct*d to be an everyday top six (or top 2 D) player for the next decade must come back this way. If Garth gets a deal like that, he has to make it. Otherwise, I’ll keep my 50% of Mark Streit and wait for my own prospects.
"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science
(I agree with TMC about trading captains. McCabe was the captain for 15 minutes before Milbury shipped him and Bertuzzi off for the ghost of Trevor Linden),

I know I am in the minority on this but that hurt me more than any other trades in Islanders history. I seriously LOVED McCabe- Bertuzzi, too. I met him and he was such a great guy. I wore black for a week and literally cried throughout the next series of games. He cried when he was traded, too… he wanted to have his whole career here. :(
I absolutely HATED Linden for it, too. It didnt help that he came here in body only and left his heart and soul in Vancouver, and took a Captaincy he didnt even care about. Sigh… touchy subject with me, even now.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Jan 9, 2012 12:26 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, hated that trade
McCabe had his struggles, but he loved it here, gave his all and was a heart and soul player. Stood up for teammates, hit, fought, blocked shots etc.
NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Jan 9, 2012 8:32 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I like and still like Linden
but he was a shell of himself when not playing for the Canucks. Nice guy and a very very good player – for that one team.
If anything, he’s a walking example of how overrated veteran leadership is.
"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science
"Everyone", this trade would be about the "future". Do you all really think Streit is gonna be a difference maker at 37yrs old on a playoff team?
This trade is for the future team. Getting rid of a declining Mark Streit who will likely only stop us from getting say, a 4th overall pick vs a 6th overall pick this year is the only real decline. Yes, we are 1-less top 4 d-man next year, but who’s to say Streit’s game doesn’t change and he is still slowly turning into MAB? Who’s to say he’s gonna be worth anything next year? Who’s to say because he’s on the roster next year Garth doesn’t turn him into a loyal cap mule and give him a contract into his late 30s’ that we will all hate? Don’t get me wrong, I love what Streit has done for this team, but Streit doesn’t look the same as he did before the injury. Streit isn’t as effective offensively as he once was. Streit is only going to get worse, not better. Why not turn him into a 2nd round pick or 3rd round pick or even a forward prospect from a team with forward depth?
Point is, we aren’t going anywhere at all this year with our team. Next year is likely going to be another rebuild year too unless garth magically reconstructs this team in more ways then one, especially if we are likely starting a rookie-Strome, rookie-DeHaan, rookie-Cizikas, and should-be-rookie Nino on our roster. The “only” downfall of this trade I see is if you think we are gonna seriously no question make the playoffs next year and need streit for a playoff run to give us some offense, other then that, there is no real reason not to trade streit away while he has value and can give a nice return.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
My post above about Ed Westfall could have been my response to this.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Jan 9, 2012 8:57 AM EST up reply actions
I think Streit doesn't have a lot of impact as the C though.
-There is the language barrier
-There are times this year where the team has come out completely flat, not like they are being led/told in the right way
-Streit himself is going through big lumps this year
-
Personally, I see Streit more as a figurehead then an actualy Captain. Unless he is heavily vocal and guiding behind closed doors, which I don’t see given his on-ice communication and the team’s play/“learning”, I think he is being dubbed a lot more important to the team as a C then he is actually doing. I can’t directly prove he isn’t being all he can be as Captain, from looking outside it sure doesn’t look like Streit is doing his job any better then a C- if Westfall guiding is the goal.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
The more I see this team
the more it tells me that Tavares is the future C.
Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.
What language barrier? He's not Esa Tikkanen that couldn't even be understood by the Finns.
The team coming out flat doesn’t seem like a Captaincy issue, more of a coaching issue. We’re not in the locker room so it is hard to judge these sorts of things. IS he playing at his previous level? No. Is his current level still better than all but one defender on this team? Yes. Is that likely to change over the course of the next two seasons? Not by much.
I'm sure you've seen enough interviews to see he searches for words at times to explain things.
And it’s not his intelligence that stops him from finding the word, it’s his english.
“Is that likely to change over the course of the next two seasons? Not by much.”
This is where you’re wrong. The change of players play/health between the age of 34 to 37 isn’t a pretty minimal decline. And at times the decline is drastic.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
Esa Tikkanen wasn't dumb either, he was smart enough to create hi own language.
Is it likey that the Islanders have found 4 more better defenseman than Streit in the next 2 seasons? I still believe that to be highly unlikely. They were unable to find one defenseman better than Mottau, Jurcina or Eaton in the off season. You have to look at what are the options available to replace him, not whether he will still be the same player. I’m not saying he must be re-signed to a long term contract either. I’m just saying don’t be in such a rush to trade him knowing that it may be near impossible to find a replacement even through the draft. Again, I’m not looking at Streit being a difference maker, just a solid defenseman that can contribute in the 4-5 spot.
As for the language, JT has been speaking English his entire life and has been trained in medai speak since the age 13 and I hear more “umms”, “uhhhs” and “you knows” from him than Streit. I really don’t think eloquence translates into leadership. We’re looking for hockey players not statesman. I think a guy like Goring would have been an excellent leader , yet he is a color commentor that can’t string a phrase together.
40 years of Islanders Hockey.
40 years of Passion.
I can understand him pretty well.
"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science
by PGI on Jan 9, 2012 3:55 PM EST up reply actions
Ill remember to bring an interpreter if we ever meet at a LHH function lol.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Jan 9, 2012 10:53 PM EST up reply actions
Langage barrier!?!?!!!
Mark Streit speaks English beautifully and fluently.
Having an accent doesnt produce a language barrier!!!
I really dont agree with any of this.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Jan 9, 2012 6:01 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
So you are saying he is doing everything he possibly can to help the youngings and this team win vocally/in-the-locker-room/in-practice/ and on the ice in games?
Let’s not act like Streit is Iginla. Streit seems like a straight faced laid back guy that isn’t going to bust balls when the going is tough. A little “let’s go” here or there, maybe, but this guy isn’t gonna rile the team up like Gillies or a vocal captain would.
Thus, he get a C/C- from me as his grade for captaining this team.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
*I* am not presuming anything and proclaiming what the room is like even though Im not in there and I have nothing to base it on.
But that is what you are doing.
Ozzy, be fair- how can you possibly be telling people whats what about this?
And what on Earth is making you so sure that there is some kind of a Captaincy problem? There is nothing- literally, nothing- that even hints at any such thing. This is nothing but wild- and, honestly, baseless- speculation.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Jan 9, 2012 6:08 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
I absolutely agree with this post
But I do think there is a minor problem with Streit as the captain. It has nothing to do with motivation or helping out the young players or anything like that. I think it has to do with him coming back from a year off from injury and stepping right into the captaincy.
We see him struggling, though he hasn’t looked as bad in the past few games. I’m sure a lot of this – most of it, even – is a result of the injury and the year off. But to step right into the captaincy like he has might throw some pressure onto a guy who might not have fully recovered yet, and as a result, may be trying to do too much. Again, I have no proof of this, but it’s a reasonable explanation. We know he can be a captain; he was captain of the Swiss national team forever. But the situation in which he walked into might have contributed to his poor play.
However, I don’t think this has any effect on the team’s play, necessarily. Perhaps just his own. And as a result of the disparity we have on D, the team may be suffering. Just a guess though. I couldn’t tell whether or not this was actually true.
by sayvillelax94 on Jan 9, 2012 9:07 PM EST up reply actions
There is some hints, but nothing major at all.
The islanders have come out flat in a number of games early on in the season. As captain, I’d put it on his shoulders to pump them up when their dragging themselves and their heads are down(figuratively).
I don’t know if he does this behind closed doors, but the stupid penalties and gigantic brain farts by some of our d-men should be addressed by streit. He’s gotta tell them over and over again: play smart, don’t gamble, if you’re a slow skater cheat back on things so you don’t get caught out of position, have control of your stick at all times(penalties), etc. I don’t know if he does it, but based on what i’ve seen I don’t believe so, but again “I don’t know”.
But I may just be putting too much on Streit’s shoulders. I do think “a lot” of captains are mostly figureheads, given nothing more then a pep talk here or a good job there or a do this wherever. I don’t know. I just think on a young struggling team, Streit should be doing everything he can to boost this team’s morale and play, and I’m not sure he is(but I don’t know). Either way, I think his “captaincy” is overrated. It’s not like he’s Potvin was or Westfall was. He’s Mark Streit, a 5yr vet when he was given captaincy, and a player who has actually played less career nhl games at the start of the season then Nabokov/Rolston/Pandolfo/Staios/Jurcina/, not to knock him, I’m just saying. Streit is no player with vast NHL or playoff experience(11gms), Streit is no player who had a long nhl career, Streit isn’t a player who’s played on basement team’s till he came here, Streit’s never been on a deep playoff run, Streit’s only been playing regulary in NA/NA-rinks for 5yrs. I’m not saying he was the wrong choice, I’m just saying thinking he is gonna have a huge impact as captain of this team is wrong, but given where we are and what type of team we are, he should have a lot of tasks to do to make this team as good as it can be as captain. Understand where I’m coming from?
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
But wouldn't that just ruin Nino's development?
At this point the sole point of keeping Streit is to mentor Nino isn’t it? Just kidding, but we don’t know how Streit interacts with the younger players. Every other veteran on this team is an anchor, why get rid of the one guy that can still play?
Part of the Captain’s job is to communicate with the coaching staff. I think Streit may be the best guy on the team to carry the players message to the coaches as well. It isn’t just “rah, rah bold prediction in the newspaper”, it is keeping the team on the same page.
Yeah, I'm a little perplexed on what we should account for Streit to be doing exactly.
It all depends on perspective. There is no Captain checklist of necessary must do’s really. I’ll give him a pass, but I would entail being a captain of a basement team is a lot more work-heavy, or should be, vs being a captain of a perennial cup contending team.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
We really have no clue what the Captain is doing
Gillies or a vocal captain would
Remember Gillies was replaced as Captain by Potvin. Defensman just make better Captains than your average forward does and goaltenders shouldn’t even be let out of the crease.
Iginla is a great example of a forward that has a great reputation and has lead the Flames to what? He got beat by Vinny LeCavalier. Ryan Smyth is another great Captain Canada that has lead his multuiple teams where? I don’t believe the hype. Chara speaks worse than Streit and he had a Cup over his head last year.
some D context mostly apart from trade talk
I think the recent assessments of the potential and also certain contributions have been a bit tough on the current D. Sure, they haven’t got what they expected from the D overall and that’s disappointing. And sure, most of the D have indiviudally showed a certain area where they’ve struggled quite a bit (Jurcina brain farts, Staios penalties, Streit speed/mobility, etc.) and they deserve some blame. But really, in my opinion the biggest fails happened early in the season and it’s generally been clearly better as of late. And I also think the truly terrible play of Mottau in the first 20 games and also the general struggles of Eaton have been lumped together with some much more specific weaknesses of the other D.
Streit for example showed some signs of struggles in terms of speed and mobility early on, but has looked better there in my opinion lately. He also struggled with the decision making with the puck early on, made lots of bad plays out of the own zone, but has cleaned that part up quite nicely for my liking. I think that had a bit to do with trying to do too much, which I think has often been a bit of an issue for him throughout his career. However, at EV he’s really only -6 at this point, all other minuses stem from empty-net situations or shorthanded goals against. And plus/minus would look even better for him if they had a bit more shooting luck when he’s on (just 6.8% currently) – and that of course would also help to improve his EV scoring point stats. On the PP, he’s been producing points at a higher rate than ever in his career. The whole 1st unit and especially JT as well as decent shooting luck on the PP deserve some credit there. But Streit has been elite in that area this season. And he’s been solid on the PK, as well posting career-best numbers in terms of shots allowed. He’s of course not playing toughest PK minutes at all, but he’s never done that.
Overall, well, I’m not saying I’m fully happy with what he’s done. I think he needs to be a little better, given the offensive opportunities he gets I expect him to be a plus player on this team. That said, he’s been just -1 at EV (excluding empty-net situations) over the last 22 games. I don’t know if the injury had an effect early in the season, but it could be a good guess. And lately he’s really played better, got better results and I just feel it would be very dangerous at this point to attribute his performance this season to an overall decline of his game. I understand if some are a little worried, I too have concerns especially regarding his speed and mobility. And I know no one thinks he’s useless these days anyway. But really, his underlyings didn’t look all that much better two or three years ago.
And Jurcina for example has suffered from very bad goaltending behind him (87.3% at EV – PDO of 93.6%). Also here, I understand some part of the frustration because he really made some dumb looking plays in front of the own net. And I know people who don’t believe in PDO as much as I do will say that’s why the save percentage is so bad when he’s on. Well, yeah, possible to some extent, but Jurcina’s always had that weakness and yet his career PDO is at 100.8% since 2007.
Again, not trying to find an excuse for the play of these players. They need to step it up a little. But the results they’ve got this season have, for various reasons beyond their control, been below the potential they most likely still possess. So, yeah, not quite sure certain parts of the D deserve the blame they’ve got for the Isles’ general woes this season. And looking ahead to next season or also 13-14 I think it would be quite difficult to replace what Streit is doing for them now
by BenHasna on Jan 9, 2012 9:46 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Those empty net goals
are going to feed a BS narrative all season for these players. They’ve given up what 10? 12? Make Moulson even more impressive because really, he’s probably a +13 or something without those.
NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
As "bad" as Streit has looked this year,
It is still noticeable how much better the transition is when he is on the ice. We were lamenting the lack of puck moving D to start the season and yet the line that he played behind consistently moved the puck forward. He’s made some bad decisions, but his outlet pass options have been often – high risk or Staois.
Maybe I a little biased because I didn’t expect much from him this year. Certainly not in terms of what we saw two seasons ago. He was supposed to be ready by the end of last season and yet he wasn’t. He was hurt way worse than the Islanders would ever admit and a full season off for any player is going to be tough. I expect his level of play to improve, but compare him to Okposo who only missed 40 games last year and you see the number of games and a realistic rate of improvement. Then sandbag him with Staois and you are looking at another load he has been bearing.
by Hockey1919 on Jan 9, 2012 4:01 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
What does trading Streit net you?
Streit may be an asset of declining value. He may not recover fully from his surgery… and he may never give the Islanders what they need from a 20+ minute defenseman. But why would you think that somebody would want the last year and a half of that contract given his performance this year.
WHo gives up anything more than a middle round draft pick for the off chance that Mark improves over his next 120 games… and actually plays more than 90 of them. What would you pay if you needed a 3rd pair defender who could help on the PP. Most teams that require that, won’t have the cap room to carry him next year.
Why would the islanders get rid of a $4M cap hit when they’d just have to replace it with another MULE. They don’t need another forward, and who would give them a better defenseman… it just doesn’t make sense.
I personally don’t think Streit is really any part of the problem. Nor is carrying his salary. The fact that they do not have better talent around him on the back line is the biggest problem. Streit should be used as a thrid pair guy until he recovers. They don’t have anybody else, though, to replace his second pair role. They are already asking too much of his defensive teammates.
Their tradable assets are Nielsen and Parentau. They might get something for Nabokov, but not much. They probably won’t get much for Frans or PA either, but we can at least hope that Morrow has identified a defensive prospect closer to the NHL than their current AHLers… or at least one with the size and strength they lack.
I've had enough! It's time to call out Garth Snow!
@JPinVA
If a team is willing to take Kaberle, then Streit is a steal.
And looking at the Islander defense this season, I would have taken Kaberle for what they had to give up. Kaberle may be terrible, but he isn’t Mottau level of bad.
No argument there...
But Montreal was buying a bad contract with Spacek(CHEAP). Montreal wasn’t giving away Subban for Kaberle. They were saying that defensemen were at such a premium that they take on the cap hit to have a middling D that could help their PP.
We’re not in the same postion. I don’t want to give away a D for another D. We need somebody who needs a forward and has an inventory of D. That is rare in the NHL economy.
I certainly don’t want to giv eup on Streit just to dump his contract. They can eat his contract if he doesnt’ recover, but if he does recover they could never get comparable value while he’s still a question mark.
We certainly aren’t going to find somebody willing to give us a 27-30 year old 20+ minute 30+ point D for “question” Mark Streit…. with another year left on a $4M contract. There’s just no logic to it.
I've had enough! It's time to call out Garth Snow!
@JPinVA
Just saying that Streit is worth far more than Kaberle
Take into accountcontracts, level of play etc. Even having said that, I still think Kaberle would help the current Islanders defense. Not even sure that a Mottau/Eaton/Reese or Jurcina for Kaberle would have not made the deal happen. The cost of Kaberle’s contract is probably what made the Islanders avoid any offer.
Kaberle's defense is deteriorating, it was smart not to touch him.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
Kaberle is not very good, but he isn't Islander bottom 4-8 bad either.
For an organization with cap space and deep pockets it was a low risk move. The Islanders have space, but not the money to bury him in the AHL if that is what is required. He’s not necessarily on my want list, but when you look at the defense beyond Hamonic, AMAC and Streit, beggars can’t be choosers either.
I think Kaberle is overpaid and underperforms, but look at what Wiz got from CBJ and you realize the real cost to sign even a marginal defenseman. The next concern is if they would even agree to come to the Island. My concern is that quality defenseman have their choice of destination and Nassau doesn’t seem to be the destination of choice.
WHo gives up anything more than a middle round draft pick for the off chance that Mark improves over his next 120 games… and actually plays more than 90 of them. What would you pay if you needed a 3rd pair defender who could help on the PP. Most teams that require that, won’t have the cap room to carry him next year.
I think that shortchanges Streit quite a bit. The biggest problem with him this year hasn’t necessarily been with his own play, but the fact that he can’t carry any of his, err, less talented teammates. I do think if he were paired with a better than average defenseman, rather than a far-below-average one he’d look a whole lot better in a hurry.
I agree that in the end the Isles should keep him, but I think he’d be very attractive bait at the deadline.
The danger in hesistation
There’s the sports cliche that if you’re going to make a mistake, make it at 100 percent. If you hesitate you leave everyone around you frozen. Whether people think it is a mistake or not, the Islanders committed to rebuilding the team through the draft. Streit won’t be here to enjoy the spoils of the rebuild, if we can get a significant value for him then there’s no question we should trade him. It serves no purpose to say let’s get rid of others, compile draft picks, but not do it for 1 guy when we’re still clearly in rebuilding mode. This season is a lost cause as far as the playoffs are concerned, so it doesn’t matter how bad our defense gets this season. Streit will be a declining asset from here on out, trading him while he still has value is the ideal situation.
Getting value back for Streit is probably the best personnel move we can make. It opens up roster space for us to see what we have in guys like Reese & Wishart who are reaching the stage they need to be evaluated and if injuries occur we can get some time to the young guys. We already know Mottau, Staios, and Eaton are useless and god willing will not be resigned but having suffered with them this long I think we can see the season out. Trading Streit puts us in a position to see where we stand for next season. We know Hammer and Amac are locks, we’d probably like to retain Jurcina giving us 3 guys. I’d also like to think that 1 out of Donovan, De Haan, and Ness should be in line for a promotion. With Streit gone we can find out whether Wishart is ready. This will give us a better idea of how much money we need to spend in the offseason.
I don’t buy the argument you can’t trade Streit because he’s the captain, although a different situation it seemed to work out alright for Philly this summer. In the same way that Streit has been a stop gap defensemen for us because of his age, he’s also the stop gap captain, there because of his years of service to the Islanders not necessarily because he’s the true leader of the team.
Bottom line is that Garth needs to ruthless in his commitment to the long term future of this team. Streit isn’t the long term future and there are questions as to whether he’s even the immediate future. If we can get a good stable of picks or prospects for someone looking for a puck moving defensemen in the playoffs the answer needs to be Streit’s for sale.
You wouldn't believe how good the Corsi is for my NHL 12 Be A Pro player.
The argument against trading Streit is that you literally have no one to take his place
The team cannot develop any further if half of the lineup is made of scrubs, cast-offs, waiver pick-ups and projects. I’m not looking at trading picks and prospects to improve two points in the standings either, but you can’t gut the team continually in hopes of re-building some time in the future.
Reese and Wishart are what they are and even in his decline Streit is still twice the defenseman they have shown themseves to be. You trade Streit and next season your defense is Hamonic, AMAC and pylons 1,2,3,4 that you find in free agency. Jurcina is at his best when he is a seventh defenseman. His height helps him watch the game from the press box. We can find out if Wishart is ready now, without trading Streit, simply demote Mottau.
You may have a couple of additions from Bridgeport come up, but we constantly lament how Bailey has been ruined (even though I’m not convinced) and now we want to rush our defenseman into the NHL too? Hamonic’s play has too many people convinced that his ability to step in and play is a normal development for a young defenseman. It isn’t and we shouldn’t expect the same from anyone else. Wishart is the more probable growth rate for your defenseman.
Streit may just be the most valuable chip Garth has at this point, since there isn’t a team in the league that wouldn’t love to add a defenseman and especially one of Streit’s caliber. The inverse is also true, it is going to take a hell of a lot to find a defenseman capable of playing in your top four.
I think it all depends on team projection though.
Are we gonna really challenge for a playoff spot next year or not? If not, I think move Streit while he has value. I think it’s fairly obvious, even if we have a somewhat miracle run we are likely finishing 20th best in the NHL, most likely though we are gonna be a 4th-8th worst nhl team. Now going from this, Garth should take into account we are going to be likely starting a few rookies next year and if he thinks or will bring in the stopgaps or longterm fill-ins to help us make a real playoff run next year. And Streit should be moved depending on how Garth feel’s about next year’s roster and playoff hopes(projecting/guessing obviously).
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
Even if I think the Islanders may be hard pressed to challenge for aplayoff spot next season,
I think they can’t continuallt regress in the standings either. Remove Streit and they will look worse net year than they have this year. I’d love to get some value for an expiring asset, but in the same token, you can’t attract players here if the orgnaization is composed of kids and castoffs.
You will get less for him next year than this, but there is also something to be said for what he brings over the next 2 seasons as well. Do you really want to pay to see an Islander team that features Jurcina, Staois, Mottau and Eaton among your top 4? That would be downright criminal to the players that have signed for the next 4 to 5 years, knowing that they have almost no chance of winning or improving.
Even the Penguins and Blackhawk teams when they were terrible had some veteran prescence. You need to at least attempt to put out a competitive line-up or you are just throwing in the towel every season.
I understand where you are coming from, but if more than 1 of Jurcina/Staios/Eaton/Mottau are resigned last year, Garth needs to be fired.
That type of move after “most” of those guys sucked (Eaton and Mottau don’t belong in the NHL, Jurcina is a 6/7th d-man, and Staios is slow and takes stupid penalties left and right.), would warrant Garth mentally ill. DeHaan’s new injury makes things interesting, but if he finishes the season with 2+ full healthy months, no reason to think he shouldn’t be ready for an nhl job at training camp. He’s been touted for it, he’s been brought along slow, and it’s about that time for him, whether it’s bottom pair minutes and PP minutes or more. And just given what we have now, A-mac/Hamonic and even slot dehaan in if he’s gonna be given lots of PP time next year, we really shouldn’t have to worry that much about a “better defense” next year, unless garth fails completely on acquiring D, which shouldn’t be closed to allowed to happen. Other then jurcina, non of those guys should or will be resigned. Thus, our defense will only get better next year I believe, even without streit. Just upgrading our bottom d-pair to nhl caliber d-men will make a difference. I’m not saying without streit we will have a shot at the playoffs, I’m also saying with Streit and no big acquisition we have no real shot at the playoffs barring lots of chemistry and a solid acquistion to our D or O next year. And it’s just 1year. Let’s not overreact. Just the fact that they will be starting a lot of rookies usually means that it’s not gonna be a make or break year. And at the least, getting rid of streit “should” make garth want to add a better d-man to our roster then he would this year in the offseason with streit.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
Of course it depends on Garth, but even moreso the market
If Snow couldn’t bring in one decent defenseman last summer, what of the odds of him bringing in two? Not very high and I’m not syaing that is a fireable offense at this point because I still insist solid defensman are harder to find than top six forwards.
by Hockey1919 on Jan 12, 2012 9:52 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
This offseason is different though. Last offseason we had 5 d-men signed on 1 ways: Streit/A-mac/Jurcina/Eaton/Mottau and hamonic on the team,
And we let go of Hillen for nothing because of this(I’d hope, not because he wasn’t good enough), which was the wrong decision in hindsight. And since it’s not cost efficient to AHL one of them or buy them out, we had to deal with that. Going into next season, all we have is Streit/A-mac/Hamonic signed going into next year. Likely plug in some ahl player on that roster(I’d say DeHaan) an that gives us 3 NHL roster spots to play with. It’s a very different situation from last year.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
Two thoughts.
1. If you trade Streit, do it sooner rather than later or his value will be too low.
2. The team has to decide this: what is a greater value, Streit on the Islanders or the package they can get for Streit on the Islanders?
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc
Co-Manager/Writer for Pinstripe Alley, Editor/Writer for Blueshirt Banter
"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."
"Every day is a great day for hockey."
by Brandon C. on Jan 10, 2012 10:33 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Package Streit to get an established top pair D man
I think Streit playing hurt has lowered his trade value in terms of bringing back high level prospects. I think if we are to trade him it should be as part of a package with a prospect or two to get an established top pair D man who will be part of the core for the next 5 years.
by Best Thing Going on Jan 11, 2012 11:03 AM EST reply actions
Perhaps a package of:
Streit, Frans a prospect and a second round pick can bring back a top 4 D or top 6 forward.
by Best Thing Going on Jan 11, 2012 12:37 PM EST up reply actions
I think that's alittle rich
I would say the package you propose should get us a top 3 forward or a top 2 pair D.
Depending on the prospect
stuff like this can get you A top 10 forward in the league…LA and Columbus didn’t give up that much to get Carter and Richards.
NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
Why would a team trade an established top pair D man for a package including, or led by a 34 year old declining defenseman?
I think Streit is a bit overvalued by the Islanders.
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc
Co-Manager/Writer for Pinstripe Alley, Editor/Writer for Blueshirt Banter
"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."
"Every day is a great day for hockey."
I completely agree. And a number of people here wanna carry a 37yr old streit thinking he's gonna be a decent top 4 d-man in a few years.
Sell high, don’t carry him when he’s gonna be a bottom pairing offensive d-man, not to mention an elder/slower and likely injury possibility one.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
I don't think a 37 year old will be top 4
I think a 35 and 36 year old Streit will still be a top 4. Selling high makes sense if you have some assets to replace him. I just don’t see the Islander pipeline flush with NHL ready defenseman.
I definitely see your pov, and you may be right that it's better off to run him till his contract expires for the short therm.
Pretty much it goes like this:
Keeping Streit=Better for the short term team
Trading Streit=Better for the long term team
That’s pretty much the situation.
What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?
Yea
not an established one. But a team that thinks a package that includes Streit (aka Streit and Nielsen) would put them over the top for a legitimate Cup run might pull the trigger with a high-end defensive prospect who would be able to pull NHL minutes on a lesser team.
Basically, sell a strong future piece for the chance to win now. As a Ranger fan I’m sure you’re familiar with this…

by 











































