Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

The Four Letter Word All Islanders Fans Should Stop Using


Its a word that comes out of Islanders fans' mouths way too often these days.  Its 4 letters, starts with the letter C, and makes me cringe every time I hear or read it.  And for the sake of this post...and for only that reason, I am going to use it multiple times today.

The word....CORE

Star-divide

Garth Snow and the Islanders tried very hard after dismantling a team that barely made it into the playoffs a few years ago, to sell the Islanders fans on a rebuild of the team.  Management warned of a few bad years ahead in the name of building a competitive team 'correctly' through the development of young talent, and somewhere along the lines someone used the word core.  I don't know if it was a team official, a team broadcaster, or a team sponsored blogger, but the word was used and Islanders fans latched on to it.

Since the words initial use, fans have tried to define who they believe is a core player.  The problem is that fans started getting over excited about players drafted by the Islanders and players who never sniffed the NHL were being dubbed core players, players who for arguments sake, were deemed untouchable in trade discussions.  These players hadn't even played one game as a professional and they were being inserted into fans "future" lines.  As a result, other players who were just up and coming and starting to produce in the NHL and hone their skills were branded expendable as trade bait for other teams' star players.

I am going to get a lot of backlash for this but here is a list of Islanders prospects who are NOT core players (for liability sake I will say this list is valid as of July 4, 2011):

Kirill Petrov, Kirill Kabanov, Brock Nelson, Matt Donovan, Anders Lee, Casey Cizikas, Aaron Ness, Rhett Rakhshani, Mikko Koskinen, and to a lesser extent, even Calvin de Haan.

This has bothered me for a long time but what has really brought this to the forefront is possible trade talk with Phoenix for Keith Yandle.  Any speculation from fans have them sending Blake Comeau, Josh Bailey, or P.A. Parenteau to the desert, followed by "future lines" littered with the names of prospects.  Well I may be the only person in Islanders Country who feels this way, but if Don Maloney asked Garth Snow for Nelson, Donovan, and a future draft pick for Yandle I would hop on it in a heartbeat.

I would much rather give up someone with potential as opposed to guys who have proven they can produce at the highest level.  You can throw the word consistency out there all you want, and again I know I'll get an earful for this, but I'd rather keep a 25 year old winger who has scored 24 goals in a season already in his career, a 28 year old who posted 20 goals and 53 points in his first full NHL season, and a 21 year old center who already has a 35 point season under his belt, than keep a bunch of possible contributors.

The best example in recent Islanders history I can think of is the Ryan Smyth deal a few years ago.  While a lot of Islanders fans were behind the deal, there were a long list of detractors saying the Islanders had sold future stars for a late season rental.  The Islanders traded former first round pick Robert Nilsson (best season 10-31-41 and hasn't come close to that since), former first rounder Ryan O' Marra (best season 1-4-5) and a first round pick that turned into Alex Plante ( has played all of 7 games).

Now I know the Smyth deal was a rental, but the point is that prospects are a crap shoot. There are a lot more Nilsson, O' Marra, and Plantes that come out of a team's prospect pool than not.  In my opinion, to trade still young NHL talent instead of trading guys who may never take their potential to the next level is a mistake.  Hopefully Mr. Snow shares my sentiments and  we don't make the mistake of letting go guys who have proven they can produce at this level with the hope that someday one of our "core" prospects can replace their production.

Submitted FanPosts do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog or SB Nation. If you're reading this statement, you pass the fine print legalese test. Four stars for you.

Comment 36 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Kudos and concurrance

Yandle would be an enormous upgrade and as a RFA is ripe for a nice Streit-type contract.

On the SBNation Mets blog, Amazin Avenue, there are always jokes about “traid teh core!” and that is mainly pointed at Wright and Reyes who are arguably in the top 5 of their respective positions. The Isles really only have Tavares, a #1 draft pick who is still developing, and Streit, who is entering the back end of his career. No one else really matches the bill, even with how much everyone loves Moulson, Grabner, and Nielsen…and based on Nielsens’ abilities I so want to place him in the so called “core.”

"..."

by Thaddeus Ballpheasant on Jul 5, 2011 12:24 AM EDT reply actions  

It depends on how you look at it

I always thought of the core as JT, KO, Neilson and Bails (before this year). Now I’d label the core as JT, KO, Grabs, Moulson (both because they signed to stay here), and Neilsen, with MacHamonic both close.

I’m not into trading any of those guys under any circumstances. But I am definetly in the “Lets get Yandle” camp (although not in the “we needz to get Randlezz” camp).

BTW good to see you here, Thaddeus; love your work on AA.

Proud to root for the Jets, Mets, and Islanders!!!

by CharlieIsles on Jul 5, 2011 7:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

No Amac?

 I would include Amac in the core. He held up the blue line this year and proved himself as a very capable defender. Plus he is only 24 year old with time to grow with the other players on the Island.

All Who Oppose Grabner Shall Perish.

by pippup on Jul 5, 2011 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Correct

I didn’t invent the phrase but MacHamonic refers to both Amac and Travis. And you know, it’s amazing, they should be in “the core”, but I almost felt I had too many guys in the core. Nice problem to have, huh?
JT, KO, Neilson, Grabner, Moulson, MacDonald, Hamonic. That’s a 7 player core right there.

Proud to root for the Jets, Mets, and Islanders!!!

by CharlieIsles on Jul 6, 2011 7:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Definition in Hockey terms I read was:

five forwards – of which two would be centres, two D and your goalie – a core 8 – it is a term related to a cap as well…

me personally, i’d rather take history as a lesson…the greatest teams in hockey history were built from the ground up, with very few major trades…even bill torrey resisted all the abuse and criticism, never made a major trade until acquiring goring….as everyone knows not all prospects pan out, and over 50% of NHLers are drafted in the first two rounds - with all the highend prospects Isles have, i’d rather let them develop, see what we have and then trade from depth to fill in the holes…after watch Chara hoist a cup with that C on his chest for Boston, and Luongo at the other end…yeah, short term gain and more long term pain…trade away prospects to get closer to playoffs but further from the cup, no thanks been there done that, saw the movie, bought the rights….lets do it the right way this time, Milbury’s greatest mistake was he had no patients

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jul 5, 2011 3:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Hockey has so many specialized positions

that you’re not really building around specific players, as much as you’re just always trying to fill those positions with the best players possible. I almost made the argument that the Islanders are trying to build around John Tavares. But in all actuality JT just fills your number 1 center position. If in 3 years we have a team in place that makes the playoffs and then JT bolts to another team as a FA (I realize JT most likely wont be a FA in 3 years, just an example). Then the Isles sign Eric Staal to replace him and the team makes the playoffs again the next season.

The team wasnt built around Staal, but performed just as well. It’s just interchanging Number 1 centers. So there is no need for a core, just a need to fill specific positions. Core is just a group of talent a bad team has to make fans hopeful for the future. Detroit doesnt have a core. They just have a really good team top to bottom.

I'm the only RFA to get a qualifying offer worth less than the year before

by Chris McNally on Jul 5, 2011 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

disagree on one thing

Detriot does have a core…and that core has famously signed for less to stay together…that is the very philosophy Yzerman is now trying to sell Stamkos on – but it is looking like Stamkos will still want top dollar and will not give a homer discount as part of TB “core”..

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jul 5, 2011 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

My "Core" that are NOT available for trade.

A-Mac, Hamonic
Tavares, Okposo, Moulson,
Grabner, Nielson,
Comeau, Bailey

Nino & Strome (Prospects that are not available)

by Sal Interlandi on Jul 5, 2011 8:07 AM EDT reply actions  

I don't think

anyone is not available. I’d trade any of those guys for Sidney Crosby or Alex Ovechkin. Unlikely to happen, but no one should be labeled off limits.

by afrosupreme on Jul 5, 2011 8:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

agree

even Gretzky was traded in his prime…

by nullzero00 on Jul 5, 2011 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think CORE is important for fans but would consider talks on players

I like to keep #1 picks but would listen to offers for Bailey after 3 seasons. It would have to be a good offer. I would prefer to hold him until trade deadline. He may fetch a decent return.

My Core is JT, MM, KO and Grabner then Hamonic and Amac on D
I would probably not look to trade Nino or De Haan until they have had a chance at the NHL level.

I say no one is completely untouchable still. I mean EDM traded 99. I mean if someone came up with a good enough trade for JT, maybe get them to take DP with him. I might take it. It woul dhave to be an awesome deal. I would prefer to see JT on the team for 12-15 seasons but if there were an offer that made the team better, that would have to be entertained

Any task BIG or small, Do it well or not at all

by Rickfansince76 on Jul 5, 2011 10:27 AM EDT reply actions  

There's one thing about prospects

Everyone knows that it’s well-nigh impossible for every kid to hit big, if at all. Take the list of our prize futures: de Haan, Nelson, Niederreiter, Strome, the Kirills, Donovan, Cizikas, Lee, Koskinen, Nilsson, Poulin, ROSEN! ! 1 !, and Mayfield.

That’s fourteen kids. I’ve left off a few, obviously. We all know that all fourteen won’t be Islanders stars. Some might never make the league for more than a cup of coffee. A few I have left off might become good regulars – MacDonald was a sixth-rounder, after all.

Granted all that, it still makes sense to hold on to some of these kids and let them develop, rather than trading them all for established players. Out of the fourteen, it’s certain that a few WILL make it, and perhaps one or two will be very good. The point is to turn the picks into good NHL players, and while it may be more certain to do it through trading the picks for players, it’s very rare to find yourself cornerstone stars that way. The Isles traded for Goring, but they drafted their hall-of-famers themselves. Sure, PAP is a known quantity of 50-ish points… but that cuts both ways. It makes him perhaps more valuable to certain trading partners than a kid who could hit 75, or top out at 35. And it also means that, if we want to be serious contenders, we want to upgrade the production we get from that spot on our first line.

You named Nelson, Donovan, and a pick for Yandle. Sure, that’s completely defensible. None of them may ever be as good as Yandle is. But if Maloney asked for Nino, Poulin, and a first… I’d almost certainly decline. And a kid like Strome is untouchable. I’d rather lose PAP than Strome, even though he is a 53-point player. The point is that he’s not likely to ever be more than that, while in three years, Strome could be hitting for 75… at a lower cost and younger age.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Jul 5, 2011 10:53 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree TOTALLY

Theres a reason I didn’t name Nino, Strome, or Poulin. Those are players who I believe are on a different level than the others. I wouldn’t trade any of those guys bc I believe they have potential all-star written all over them. If they miss at this level, it’ll mean they will be an average NHL player in all likelihood. As opposed to the others, where if they miss, the only time they may see an Islanders jersey is at training camp.

I'm the only RFA to get a qualifying offer worth less than the year before

by Chris McNally on Jul 5, 2011 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

I like your post, but we really can't get too touchy with the "core" word.

In reality, there is a very very small list of “priceless/untradable” players on Garth’s list that include Tavares and a couple 1st round prospects/d-men(A-mac/Hamonic say). Other then that, every player has their price. Let’s be real. Very few players are untouchable. PAP/Bailey/Comeau all are likely players that can be moved for the right price. You may not want to hear their names in trade talk, but it’s gonna happen for good reason, they are the most likely nhl players on our team to move to bring in a better nhl player because of their value and because they are more expendable then the Okposo’s and Moulson’s of the team. Don’t be surprised if a trade Garth does this summer has one of them on the move, I too would prefer a top pairing d-man trade for prospects like De Haan + Nelson + 1st/2nd round pick for Yandle/Suter, but if Maloney/XXXXX responds with DeHaan + Comeau/Bailey/PAP + 1st/2nd round pick for Yandle/Suter, Garth isn’t holding up that trade for a 3rd liner who can likely be eventually replaced by a prospect. If it was Moulson/Okposo, that’s another thing, but a 3rd liner (Comeau/PAP/Bailey) with “possible, but say unlikely for now” 2nd line upside is definitely expendable longterm vs a top 6er, especially if the trade brings back a Streit-successor. Get what I’m trying to say? Frigging Mike Richards was untouchable to Philly, Mike Richards! Don’t be worrying about PAP/Bailey/Comeau in trade talks, when even the right trade proposal would pluck Moulson/Nielsen away(not highly likely, but it’s the truth).

by OzzyFan on Jul 5, 2011 2:37 PM EDT reply actions  

yep

just as we look at other teams rosters and covet their best players like shea weber while scoffing at the spare change, other teams do the same in kind to us…they want our best players, the best and most promising prospects, and they are not interested in depth or spare part players.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jul 5, 2011 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its semantics and personal opinion as far as who's on the fringe of our 'core'

but I don’t think it is a word we should avoid but really there is always one guy in my opinion who is untouchable- JT. Anyone else is fair game if we feel we can get upgrades by trading them. I might also put Grabner as untouchable only because his skill-set is so elite and he is still so young and cheap. Both he and JT both still have enormous upside. Yandle would be a nice addition although with Streit returning and having some blueline prospects moving up I wouldn’t commit too much money to signing him and I also would be leery about giving up more than one proven 20 goal scorer. We scored about league average last year but that was after years of being at the basement of scoring league-wide. We could easily regress next season and at least going into the season should keep proven scorers and then make them expandable if rookies or young guys prove themselves. Kabanov is someone I would only trade if it was a very good return. He probably has as much upside as any prospect- he is up there with Strome and Nino and might have an even higher ceiling. He is also unlikely to reach his full potential so that is something to keep in mind if a very good offer comes along- sell high to hedge against him busting.

by MatthewM11 on Jul 5, 2011 3:20 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

if we regress in scoring, and it is not due to injuries...

that would defy gravity…kids improve over the first 2 to 4 or so years in their careers, can’t see them all regressing…if at least some of them don’t continue to improve, something is obviously wrong

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jul 5, 2011 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I had Comeau, PAP and Moulson in mind

and Grabner and Okposo should meet or exceed last year’s production but it’s not a given. My guess would be that we outscore what we did last year but you never know. My point was that we should carefull about shedding too many goal scorers at this point.

by MatthewM11 on Jul 5, 2011 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed on grabner

we now have to see how other teams adapt to him, and how grabner adapts to that and if he can still get through…so far it looks like a yes…but with ko, if he doesn’t improve on his overall production from last year, to me that can only mean he was injured and not on the ice

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jul 5, 2011 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let's get this straight

It’s seven letters, not four, and it goes by TEH CORE124

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Jul 5, 2011 4:23 PM EDT reply actions  

The core

Parenteau, Martin, Hillen, Koskinen = elite playmaker, bruising goal scorer, shut down dmen and all star goaltender. DYNASTY

by backstop87 on Jul 5, 2011 5:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Cody Rosen = future perennial vezina winner

Tony De Hart = The next Bobby Orr
Bobby Hughes = The next Bobby Hull

by MatthewM11 on Jul 5, 2011 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I've missed a lot of comments lately

So maybe I haven’t picked up on abuse of “TEH CORE,” but to me that term is pretty simple: Which players would you bother committing long-term deals to? Right now that includes guys like Nielsen, Tavares, Okposo, Grabner, A-Mac.

That doesn’t mean they are untouchable, and it doesn’t mean you wouldn’t shed them for futures if circumstances change later on. It just means that when you’re building/enhancing your team 1-3 years into the future, you have a pretty good idea these guys are bankable (important) parts of it.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jul 5, 2011 6:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Im not against an idea of a Core

I have two main problems with the concept of a core though

1. That in some peoples eyes the core has become a few NHLers and a lot of players that they hope and wish become NHLers and

2. Good teams don’t talk about cores and what they have, they talk about what few holes need to be plugged and what they need

I’m not saying that the Isles should be considered a good team, but it’s at the point of the rebuild where we should have enough players in place where we start talking more about what we need to complete this team and less about what we have going forward. Prospects who are 2-3 years away from being productive NHLers shouldn’t be counted on so highly to be pieces of the puzzle. They should be luxuries that will enable us to either replace or upgrade pieces we already have in place down the road, whether it is the actual prospect stepping in, or being trade bait for a player that can.

I'm the only RFA to get a qualifying offer worth less than the year before

by Chris McNally on Jul 5, 2011 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now I'm confused

I agree with you on this:

Prospects who are 2-3 years away from being productive NHLers shouldn’t be counted on so highly to be pieces of the puzzle.

But I’m not sure how you got there. How can we talk about what holes need to be plugged if we can’t talk about the players they already have that we don’t have to worry about? A hole is defined by the solid ground around it. It’s pretty important to know what you have to work with, or you’ll have no clue how to get the rest – and you’ll probably wind up going backwards if other teams have a better evaluation of your own talent than you do.

I hear you on point #1, fans do take TEH CORE to extremes, but that’s because they’re A) finally excited about the team again B) we actually have a core instead of placeholders who may win a few games here and there. These reasons go hand-in-hand.

So, I think it’s only natural that there’s some speculation about our “bankables” as Dom put it, and which “holes” can be better-filled in.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Jul 6, 2011 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Prospects as part of the core

I know a lot of these guys might not pan out but there still needs to be a certain level of expectation based on their draft position. I guess it all depends on what you get back in return, the last thing I want to see is these guys go on to be stars for other teams. You can also extend that to current members of the team. Is PAP a one hit wonder, only putting up those numbers because he played with JT & MM or a late bloomer? Does Josh need extra time because he was rushed or has he topped out as far as production goes? I thought there was were games late in the year that even though he didn’t get on the score sheet, he was one of the better players on the ice because of his defense.

I just don’t think we reached a level jettison players that have shown production at the NHL level. I feel that Garth has tried to add pieces without subtracting pieces of the core and feel we need to stay the course.

by IslesinAZ on Jul 5, 2011 7:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip and shoulder surgery not required.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Being Reasonable About Garth Snow’s First Rounders
Billy_smith_si_cover_small
LightHouse Hockey game on!
Gigantor15_small
LHH Poster's 25U25 Consensus
Jt_small
The New York Islanders and The Rebuild

Recent FanPosts

Moulsondealwithit_small
Islanders Jerseys throughout history. Which is your favorite?
Jt_small
And With the Fourth Pick, The Islanders Select...
Warlord2_small
Breaking Down the Cloutier - Salo Fight
Dutchlogo_small
LHH off-season fantasy league
890_1__small
Expectations: Strome
Small
The Angstlander -- Inside the mind of an anxious Islanders fan (that means you!)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
What else is Russian sports media telling us?

  141 votes | Results

Isles Reading

Islanders Schedule

1979-80


May 24, 1980: Tonelli to Nystrom. At long last, the steady build of the New York Islanders from expansion doormat to surprise semifinalist to annual contender reaches the promised land: Buoyed by a late season trade for Butch Goring that gave the team the depth up the middle GM Bill Torrey had been seeking, the Islanders knock off the Philadelphia Flyers in six games.

The victory justified the faith in coach Al Arbour who guided them from their second season to their first Stanley Cup seven seasons later. The Islanders would not be the first expansion team to win the Stanley Cup, but they would be the only one capable of a dynasty.

1980-81


May 21, 1981: This time it was much easier. After falling to "only" 91 points in the 1979-80 season, the Islanders returned to their division title tradition, piling up 110 points -- a whole 13 points over second-place Philadelphia.

Between the quarterfinals (where they beat the upstart Oilers in six games) and the finals, the Islanders reeled off eight consecutive wins -- with a four-game sweep of archrival Rangers in between. As they defeated the Minnesota North Stars in five games for their second Cup, their goal difference in the final was a combined +10.

1981-82


May 16, 1982: Another year, another landslide title. The Islanders won the Patrick Division by a whopping 26 points over the second-place Rangers, and were seven points clear of their nearest competition for the President's Trophy, the still-not-quite-ripe Edmonton Oilers.

A first-round scare against the Pittsburgh Penguins turned in the Isles' favor thanks to John Tonelli's heroics, and a true dynasty was on its way: Past the Rangers in six games, then an eight-game sweep of the Quebec Nordiques and Vancouver Canucks to run away with the Stanley Cup.

1982-83


May 17, 1983: Not so fast, whipper-snappers. The Edmonton Oilers' steadily rising challenge for league supremacy took them all the way to the finals for the first time, where the New York Islanders summarily dispatched them in a four-game sweep. For the Islanders, the Dynasty was secured. For the Oilers, it was a powerful lesson in where talent ends and the demands of playoff hockey begin.

Four years, four Cups, 16 consecutive playoff series wins (a record that would grow to 19 until the rematch with the Oilers the following year). Mike Bossy scored 60 goals yet again, and Wayne Gretzky became acquainted with Billy Smith's crease.


Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Warlord2_small Mark D

Lighthouse_hockey_logo_2_medium_small Keith Quinn

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Hg_small Chris McNally

Master of FIGs and Power Tablature

Icon3_small ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein

71096_479208120482_1257968_n_small David Hanssen