Idle Spec: WWGD? What would you trade for the 8th pick?
General manager Scott Howson has a window of opportunity. The conventional wisdom is he is offering the No. 8, perhaps in a package, in exchange for immediate help. They need it. How many legitimate top-six forwards do the Blue Jackets have at this point? Two or three?
>>Columbus Dispatch, your favorite source for Columbus hockey news
This is far from the first time I've seen this scuttlebutt. So it got me mulling a topic that many of you will find meaningless -- counterproductive, even -- but some of us will find fun as a thought exercise. Not that the Islanders are in the business of giving up established prime-era or young players for draft picks, but since everyone is hot on the draft at the moment, let's have at it anyway: Suppose the #8 pick is available. What would you do if you're Columbus? What would Garth Snow do if for some reason he wanted that pick?
Who would you offer? What would be your purpose? (i.e. to get two top 10 picks, or to try to move up/move down?) And if they really expect an established top six forward, are the Jackets crazy? Perhaps most importantly, is there anything you'd offer that you think Columbus would actually be interested in?
A few more references after the jump:
[By the way, if you read the full article in which this bit comes from, SBN's Blue Jackets blog The Cannon has a response.]
Recent NHL 8th Overall Picks
2010 - Alexander Burmistrov (Atlanta)
2009 - Scott Glennie (Dallas)
2008 - Mikkel Boedker (Phoenix)
2007 - Zach Hamill (Boston)
2006 - Peter Mueller (Phoenix)
2005 - Devin Setoguchi (San Jose)
2004 - Alexandre Picard (Columbus)
2003 - Braydon Coburn (Atlanta)
2002 - Pierre-Marc Bouchard (Minnesota)
There are some really nice players there -- but none who were certainties without concern or stop-and-start development. Meanwhile, there are lots of potentially exciting players in this month's top 10 draft-eligible prospects. There always are -- when they're 18.
(But hey! We could be talking about adding a Couturier and a Hamilton here! Or a Hamilton and a Bartschi here! A Zabinejad and a ... you get the idea.)
Still, when I look at that list, all I can think of is: Who would give up a real top-six forward for odds like that? There's honestly not an Islanders forward I would offer (that I think Columbus would accept) for that pick. I know the Isles have question marks in some of their future or developing forwards, but this would be dealing one current question mark for another five years down the road.
So I'm thinking, given the conditions, there's no way a true lottery team is a match. Columbus is probably hoping for a cap-maxed team (Philadelphia?) to bite, or else their chances of getting an established quality forward are slim.. Which maybe brings us full circle to, "Why did you just post this, you time-wasting bastard?"
But if June is for anything, it's for fantasy GM'ing the draft. Maybe there's a more elaborate combo up your sleeve. The floor is open. Get creative, have at it -- or tell me to get back to work.
114 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Get out the Glue and Band Aids
Trent Hunter! and the Wiznewski 2nd rounder.
"I bet Calgary wishes they had a backup goalie as their GM" - Pauly C
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
by Mark D on Jun 7, 2011 4:23 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Jeremy Colliton is the center Rick Nash has always needed.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
We should be able to get a first rounder for Jeremy
He was a high draft pick.
NOWHERE Nearly enough defensemen to last through the injury bug
great minds thing alike
I was going to say Hunter and Colliton before I added the 2nd rounder instead.
"I bet Calgary wishes they had a backup goalie as their GM" - Pauly C
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
You're giving up the future!!!1
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
Assuming they are looking for a top six forward
Our forwards haven’t reached their peak so, no established guys here. But of our current top 9, I would move PAP or Bailey and a roster depth D-man. Hillen, Juice, Katic type. probably not enough to tempt them, but given the uncertainty of th value of a draft pick, it’s not worth any more to me.
NOWHERE Nearly enough defensemen to last through the injury bug
PAP would be interesting
If we moved him, of course Columbus would be gambling that he wasn’t a one year wonder. I also think he works really well with JT and Moulson, and wouldn’t want to give up on him.
"I bet Calgary wishes they had a backup goalie as their GM" - Pauly C
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
Interesting. To me even PAP, who maybe isn't in the long-term plans
would still be a pretty significant loss for next season’s squad. But I agree his sort of profile fits at least from the Islanders’ long-term build plan.
I just can’t picture a fit. I was going to say I don’t get Columbus’ impatience (if the rumors are true), but then again I think the Islanders also have a little urgency for next year, which is why I can’t imagine them giving up anyone with a role on the 11-12 roster.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
Can see your point on this years roster
But if Garth has the chance to add 2 top 10 guys “he” wants, I can see him thinking Nino can play on the top 2 lines.
NOWHERE Nearly enough defensemen to last through the injury bug
except Garth is looking to win now
Obviously not at the expense of the long term, but I think getting rid of PAP sets the team back.
"I bet Calgary wishes they had a backup goalie as their GM" - Pauly C
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
I could buy that, yeah. If they are "sold" on two prospects or something
Woo, it starts to feel risky though. Just when I look at previous 7-10 pick areas, I keep thinking, "You could give up Blake Comeau’s production now for Blake Comeau’s production five years from now, plus or minus 6 goals and 20 points.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
I agree
PAP might not be a long term guy, but it’s hard to see shipping him for a dart in a highly unpredictable draft year (which is by default unpredictable). A twenty goal scorer seems like a high price for a completely unknown quantity.
Now, if this was part of a chain of events to move up to #1 or #2 to land Larsson, I could MAYBE see doing it then, e.g. we land #8 and ship it with #5 for #2 (and hopefully a little something else).
Meanwhile, sort of on topic
The BJ’s just let their assistant (TO the) GM and head of pro scouting go.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
Crazy draft scenario:
Edmonton trades Hemsky to Columbus for the 8th overall pick, giving Edmonton 1, 8, 19, and 31 and Columbus their needed top-six help.
Edmonton trades 8 and 19 to the Islanders for 5, guaranteeing themselves their No. 1 center and their No. 1 d-man by drafting Larsson first and whichever of the four best forwards (RNH, Landeskog, Couturier, Huberdeau) is left at 5.
Ottawa then picks Strome or Mika at 6, followed by Winnipeg choosing between the leftover center and Murphy. If Strome and Mika go 6 and 7, Isles get Hamilton like they would have anyway at 5, plus they can go for a forward like Puempel or Jensen at 19. If Strome/Mika and Murphy go 6 and 7, Isles can instead choose to draft Mika/Strome 8th and maybe trade up from 19 for Oleksiak or trade down for some depth and add Musil or Mayfield later.
by Metzfan22 on Jun 7, 2011 5:05 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I don't dought
There will be a lot of movement like this on draft day. Just because there are so many guys rated so close that players will be available well after individual teams have them ranked.
NOWHERE Nearly enough defensemen to last through the injury bug
Really?
Are we still in stage 1 of our rebuild? How about we give them $3.5M to sign a FA by taking Commodore off their hands with the 8th pick. We could give them a second rounder for good measure… or maybe Ness…. he could have a growth spurt.
If Snow could work his voodoo with Commodore and put him in the 2006-07 time machine for 100 games over 2 years it would be well worth $7M to let some of the kids develop properly in the A.
Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA
Time machine, sans hot tub
Also seeking ca. 2006 versions of Witt, Sutton (hey, even DiPietro?) and — voila, we got a playoff team!
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
Quick
What colour is Micheal Jackson?
NOWHERE Nearly enough defensemen to last through the injury bug
by since70too on Jun 7, 2011 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
MJY.... the board game.
In every year from 1970 through 2009 you get to pick a color, a gender and the biggest controversy from that year.
Everybody starts out as a black male and progress through a series of shoots, ladders, shades and rumors until… if you complete the gauntlet… you become a white catholic priest at a boy scout jamboree….
Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA
let it slide...
i don’t think the isles have anyone to give columbus because they’re technically somewhat in the same boat. as well as parenteau did last season, they still need another proven player to play with JT and moulson. which is why it’s not a bad idea to trade the 5th overall pick in a package for a scary winger. this is one where i think garth would just leave alone. whether or not the isles kepp or trade away the pick, good will come out of it. let brian burke mortgage the rest of his franchise for the 8 pick.
"son of a bitch i'm sick of these dolphins"
- Steve Zissou
Same boat
Agreed, I think that’s where my exercise probably falls apart. But dabbling in the scenarios, I can’t help it, it’s like a drug.
Plus, when it’s known they will have one pick in the top 10, people feel very strongly about what’s best. When you make it gambling to get two picks in the top 10, in my mind at least the uncertainty of any given prospect starts to come to the forefront.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
Exactly
the foolish GM’s are the ones who decide to get greedy on draft day (garth not being one of those GM’s). yeah, it looks good that you take advantage of the draft by stocking the most high picks, but at what cost? the draft is fun and it gets everyone going because it’s exciting to see the beginning of futures. not to mention gives hockey fans something to talk about. however, hindsight is 20/20. busts are bound to happen. the likelihood of the top 10 players drafted going on to great careers is unrealistic. it’s hard to get too excited because it’s in a sense gambling. nothing is a sure thing. most of these pre-draft talks and mock drafts is just overblown excitement out of a combination of “analysts” and fans who give others the illusion of hype. then again, the argument for scouting also helps make sense of the expectations of these kids.
"son of a bitch i'm sick of these dolphins"
- Steve Zissou
And THIS
is why each year I have to force myself to get excited for the draft. Bossy help me when the Islanders are drafting in the bottom 15.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
speaking of Bossy
Wasn’t he the 15th overall pick? ZOMG we can traed a spare froward for the next Bossy ! ! ! eleven !
We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog
Those soft Quebec scorers
Who needs ’em?
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
by Dominik on Jun 8, 2011 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah
Screw Mikathan Huberbossy.
When the Isles make us drink, we curse Milbury through a monocle and with our pinkies out. Lighthouse Hockey & Chivas-All Class.
Website:Lighthouse Hockey Twitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Jun 8, 2011 4:03 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
not big enough.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Jun 9, 2011 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
When the Islanders are in the bottom 15
then they’ll be in the playoffs and you won’t have to worry so much about the draft!
Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.
Trading down from #5
I know this is speculation for acquiring the 8th pick, but if I was Garth, I would only be interested in a play to move down in the draft while picking up a useful veteran that isn’t on the downside of his career. This might be the only way the Isles could acquire an impact veteran.
The #5 pick is worth more in currency than the cap space because you cannot trade cap space…or at least the Philadephias and New Jerseys of the world have not been desperate enough to trade for cap relief.
For instance, even if the Isles traded their #5 and a second-rounder (#35) for the #8 pick, I do not think they will net a useful veteran. They’ll need to trade away their #5 and not get an impact pick in this draft if they want to go that route.
That being said, if the #8 pick was available, I’d do a Bailey-style drop, but I would make sure I would get either:
- a veteran winger that could contribute to one of the top three lines over the next 2-3 seasons (and would be a top-six forward for at least the 2011-12 season while Nino acclimates to his first full NHL season) OR
- a top-four defenseman for the next 2-3 seasons
If I didn’t, no sale.
Join me on Sports With The StatMan every Monday night, Wednesday night, and Saturday morning on BlogTalkRadio (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/The-StatMan).
Islanders don't match up with Columbus but...
To play along. The only four players I see possible matching up would be Nielsen, Comeau, PAP, and Hunter.
Relax: The Islanders are not going to trade Nielsen.
PAP: As stated, since he’s on a one year deal, Columbus wouldn’t take PAP unless he was just part of a larger deal.
Hunter: A shell of the prospect he once was. Therefore, it won’t happen.
Comeau: Well, maybe. He did score 20plus last year. Can help on the PK. Do you see Comeau part of the long term rebuild? Where does he fit when, Nino, Kababnov, Petro and Brock Nelson are ready. What if the Isles draft Mika at#5? Is Comeau on the top three lines in two years?
I’m not suggesting this but, to play along. For the Islanders to make this happen and say in the end; draft Mika Zibanejad at #5 and say Siemens or Beaulieu or Strome at #8.
Comeau and the #35 pick for the #8 pick? Not sure if they’d take it; not sure I would do it.
Agreed
Exactly, Comeau is the wild card that comes to mind, but then if you’re Columbus, do you say you just gave up your (wrapped in irrational hope but hope nonetheless) first pick for Blake Comeau?
That’s why i wonder where this tale is going. If it’s a cap-strapped team they’re hoping to pinch from, I mean even — what, you just gave up a 1st for … Scott Hartnell and his $4.2 million cap hit? That’s what’s going to push you over the edge?
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
I thnk this
There’s honestly not an Islanders forward I would offer (that I think Columbus would accept) for that pick.
basically says it all.
We don’t have a top six forward, outside of the “CORE” of JT, MM, MG, KO, and FN that Columbus would give up the #8 pick for. PAP doesn’t have a proven track record and would be a huge gamble for the Jackets.
If i wanted to make an offer, I might be prepared to offer Bailey, one of the non core Dmen (and by Core, I mean, Streit, AMac, Hamonic and DeHaan, so none of those) and our late second rounder (from Montreal) for the #8
There's a mountain of buoyant nostalgia under this team and it's going to erupt like Vesuvius when the Islanders are back in playoff contention.... Count on it.
by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Jun 7, 2011 5:51 PM EDT reply actions
Jurcina and
I would add Jurcina and Wishart to the list of “core D” for the purpose of this offer. (Isles need the size.) Still, it seems like going backwards, even if the 8th pick is as good as a 5th or 6th most years. Personally, I wouldn’t give up Bailey straight up for the 8th. Maybe Comeau, but I like his potential too.
by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 7, 2011 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I prolly should have included Wishart in teh core
but I don’t know enough about him.
There's a mountain of buoyant nostalgia under this team and it's going to erupt like Vesuvius when the Islanders are back in playoff contention.... Count on it.
by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Jun 7, 2011 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions
24-16-6 v. 6-22-6
It wasn’t all coincidence. I think he helps Isles chance of winning games. To me, that’s a valuable player.
by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 7, 2011 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Jurcina & The Blue Jackets
great band for the brief period they were together. Their rare demos sell for over $100 on ebay.
wiki says:
Jurčina and Chris Clark were traded to the Columbus Blue Jackets on Dec 28, 2009 for winger Jason Chimera.
At the 09/10 Trade Deadline on March 3, 2010, Jurčina was traded back to the Caps for a conditional sixth-round draft pick in the 2010 NHL Draft. His sports hernia surgery prevented him from playing in the remainder of the 2009–10 season.
He was selected to represent Slovakia in the 2010 Olympic Games in Vancouver, finishing fourth with his team.
by noomz on Jun 7, 2011 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
It’s an outlier. The Flyers were insanely good with Carcillo in the lineup as compared to without him.
I think it was just that when he was healthy, the other dmen were healthy. When he was hurt, other dmen were hurt. So his being out tended to mean us scraping the bottom of the barrel (Dylan Reese)
"I bet Calgary wishes they had a backup goalie as their GM" - Pauly C
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
That explains
… the 6-22-6, but does it explain the 24-16-6? In other words, if Jurcina was out those 46 games as well and a guy like Hillen, Mottau, or Eaton had taken his spot in the lineup, would the Isles still have been around 24-16-6 for that stretch? (It’s possible because of the strong play of Nielsen, JT, Grabner, and others in the 2nd half of the season— and impossible to determine— but I think Isles lose a couple of those games without Jurcina.)
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think Jurcina is as good as Streit, AMac, or Hamonic, but I’d easily put him at #4 from what I’ve seen this past season. And although he doesn’t go out of his way to deliver big hits, his size is needed in the lineup unless they feel strongly that Wishart can replace that this season. (Even so, I’d rather have both for their size, even if it meant losing Hillen, my 5th favorite D.)
Isles don’t go from playoff-challenging team to bottom of the league without Jurcina, but I think they lose at least a few extra games this upcoming season if Hamonic and Wishart are counted on to provide the size on D.
I’d take the 24-16-6 group, even if they overachieved, add Streit and Niederreiter. I like Isles playoff chances with that group.
by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 8, 2011 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions
I rationalize that out by saying this
My hate is no more irrational than DPs contract…say it 3 times, and an old lady busts a hip.
When the Isles make us drink, we curse Milbury through a monocle and with our pinkies out. Lighthouse Hockey & Chivas-All Class.
Website:Lighthouse Hockey Twitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Jun 8, 2011 4:06 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t see much available to get back in return for trading back in this draft. I think we have enough picks to just draft where we are unless there is a player to trade up and get that the scouts really love. The rebuild has moved along nicely and I think we’ll be strong in the future whatever happens. We can compete for the playoffs this year and make a run in the next year or 2.
by upstate islander on Jun 7, 2011 6:01 PM EDT reply actions
Rick DiPietro
He handles the puck real well and should make an excellent top six forward for them Blue Jackets!!!
We are all Islanders, even if we are in Jersey!
by Russel Ginart on Jun 7, 2011 6:32 PM EDT reply actions 6 recs
Not sure
He still has the wheels though.
NOWHERE Nearly enough defensemen to last through the injury bug
And he can fill that role for them
… for the next decade!
by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 7, 2011 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions
depends who was still on the board @ 8 and how bad i wanted him...
but i would go with a package of players that would include two or three of, Comeau, Bailey, Hillen and Wishart,,,,,of course there are players I would rather get rid of, but I don’t think there is an interest for them. I’d love to get one of: RNH, Larsson, Huberdeau and Landeskog, and one of Mika Z, Strome, Hamilton and Courturier or Seimans.
In fact, I would say if one of RNH, Larsson, Huberdeau or Landeskog fall to five, you draft him. If not, this is a good year to trade down, as low as 8th but no further, and draft whom ever is left out of Hamilton, Strome, Mika Z and Couturier. The Latter four are very close, and all, if they hit their ceiling, would fill an Isles need. Why not get an Extra 2nd and 3rd round pick, then either trade up, our throw more darts? Take both Seth Ambroz (give us extra depth and competition for Martin in his potential future role) and Conner Murphy…huge big right D, can fight — and take big, 6’5 230 left D Mike Mckee with 50th…still would have 64th, 68th and 94th picks…
by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 7, 2011 6:48 PM EDT reply actions
Photo caption: "But I'm easy.....yeah, I'm easy.....give me the word and I'll play your game"
Go ahead, TELL me that Scott Howson ISN’T a dead-ringer for the Carradine brother named Keith in that shot!
.....I have a feeling that the preceding comment was, in retrospect, primarily for JP's benefit......
…..although SOMEbody else on this blog must be familiar with the song and/or actor!
I'm sure somebody is
But they’re probably still at the cafeteria.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
Not very interested in the 8th overall pick.
I’d be much more concerned with trying to trade up one or two spots. RNH is going 1st overall. We could really use Larsson or Landeskog more than the others. They could both step in right away and play a big role. They also seem to be two “safer” picks.
100% agree:
Giving away a few NHL players JUST to be able to pick 8th, for a prospect which could or could not be part of TEH CORE somewhere along the line is NOT a wise move. Its too Milburry like!!! Stay the course, pick 5th keep stocking up the farm.
We are all Islanders, even if we are in Jersey!
by Russel Ginart on Jun 8, 2011 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't see Comeau as part of the core
when in the next couple years we’ll be adding some more prospects to the ranks. He’s good and debatedly a straight swap for #8 with his developing production.
It’s him or Hunter and a later pick for #8 and I don’t see CBJ biting on that.
Moving Comeau opens up a spot for Garth to work his Moulson-PAP magic…or Schremp-Grabner. Whatever he likes.
If we really want, we can try packaging picks to move up and attempt an unholy Courturier-Hamilton addition. Although I am intrigued by Baertschi and Zibanijad…possibly Strome and Murphy. Ah, pipe dreams.
"..."
by Thaddeus Ballpheasant on Jun 7, 2011 7:53 PM EDT reply actions
Screw it
Trade everything for all the first round picks.
"..."
by Thaddeus Ballpheasant on Jun 7, 2011 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Not much, but...
Comeau and #50 for #8? What about Comeau, the 2 seconds for #8 and Filatov? Or Hillen in there? Ness? * Maybe he’ll want to play knowing that a couple of guys named Kirill will be here in a couple of years. Comeau is pretty frustrating and if he tops out at 20-25 the #8 may be worth a lot more.
There’s no great match, but some maybes.
If I’m Snow do I trade down from 5? Probably not unless it’s to 6 or 7 and one of the guys I want is there and I get another second rounder. Three seconds gets back into the late first and maybe nets a 3 or 4 as well.
When is the draft already?
* Not all those guys. Just one, or two of them and #50. This is an exercise in futility. Luckily, I need lots of exercise.
Я думаю, что это будет весело
to see Kirill, Nikita and Kirill doing the funky Russian in the endzone.
There's a mountain of buoyant nostalgia under this team and it's going to erupt like Vesuvius when the Islanders are back in playoff contention.... Count on it.
by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Jun 7, 2011 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Well Id love it.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Jun 9, 2011 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm just sitting here in awe of that subject line
Respect.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
I don't think anyone would part with that pick
Without a package from us…still too much uncertainty aside from the “untouchables” who I figure are all the guys who just signed, the guys already liked into cheap deals, and Tavares and ELC guys…which basically leaves PAP, BC, and JB. If I could get by trading one of those guys and a second rounder and/or middling prospect I’d do it.
When the Isles make us drink, we curse Milbury through a monocle and with our pinkies out. Lighthouse Hockey & Chivas-All Class.
Website:Lighthouse Hockey Twitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Jun 7, 2011 8:50 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
As the Columbus Mock Drafter
I had thought that Columbus might trade the pick, but to trade down, rather than for immediate help. Even if Columbus has only two or three “top 6” forwards, Ryan Johansen is sure to step in and be at least a “top 6” in talent next season.
If they are so worried about top flight players, why not draft someone like Mika Zibanejad who already plays with men, and go from there?
Trading the #8 pick just isn’t going to bring in the talent that the Dispatch is hoping for.
Unless...
…a team decides to rebuild right now, as Ottawa may be doing. Anyone on Ottawa around the same value as Moulson and expendable?… But it seems silly for CLB to trade the pick at this point in their rebuilding. I bet they keep the pick if their 5th or 6th choice is available at #8… If CLB is so keen on trading 1st rounders, why not offer BC or PAP for next year’s 1st rounder and hope it becomes a top-3 pick?
by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 7, 2011 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Not Interested in the 8th Pick, and Stay at 5
The fact that Columbus is offering the pick is further proof that the potential elite players stop around 5-7 (depending on how you view Hamilton, Murphy, Zibanejad, Couturier).
The Islanders should stay right where they are, and just take the player with the biggest upside as an “impact player” forward or defense. Sometimes you can get too fancy for your own good. See Milbury, Idiot.
Well, on the flip side
when was the last time you saw Columbus draft an impact player? Nash?
When the Isles make us drink, we curse Milbury through a monocle and with our pinkies out. Lighthouse Hockey & Chivas-All Class.
Website:Lighthouse Hockey Twitter: @KeithLHHockey
Indeed
This is why Doug MacLean is an expert on TV today.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
Yeah
I think they are likely to do that, but if they see 3 remaining players very close in value, perhaps trading down to #7 makes sense if they can pick up another 2nd rounder…. But I think Isles are more likely to trade up than down if they do trade the pick.
by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 7, 2011 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Also it only takes 1 or 2 strange picks in the top 7 for someone to fall. It’s happened before.
"I bet Calgary wishes they had a backup goalie as their GM" - Pauly C
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
PAP and Comeau
for the 8th pick? I’d do that
Perhaps a contingency deal depending on who ends up being available
These proposals
are getting crazy. Think about what our forwards would look like without Comeau and PAP, it’s not pretty.
Everyone should just skim through the #8s the past few years. Not a ton of big names in there. And most of them have taken a long time to develop into whatever level of usefulness (or uselessness) they offer.
Even the idea of trading Bailey is crazy. He may have already played more NHL games than whoever you might pick at #8 will for a career.
And this more speaks to the dumbness of the rumor. The #8 pick isn’t going to land a top-six forward, even from a team like the Islanders whose top six may not exactly be top six material.
by afrosupreme on Jun 7, 2011 10:12 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
Are you kidding? There is serious talent to be had this year at #8.
Ryan Strome is a longshot, but possible, to drop that far. Mika Zibanejad, Ryan Murphy, Sven Bartschi, etc. will be around. Those are some really talented players. I think I’d trade Bailey for all but Murphy in that group. You are severely underestimating the talent level this year at #8.
Maybe
but not of those guys sniffs “can’t miss.” Those guys might end up being good players, or they might never make the league. So to me talking about trading 20 goal scorers is insane.
Yeah, I agree with you on that- I wouldn't trade PAP and Comeau for the pick.
But as far as one or the other, I would consider it. And Bailey, considering he’s still a prospect, I think Strome, Mika Z, and maybe Bartschi are better prospects than Bailey. If Bailey were in this draft, I’d slot him around 10-12th.
guys like PAP and Comeau
are easily available – and may have limited further upside
plus, one of our weaknesses is team strength – neither of these guys helps on that front
package them for a promising star prospect?
in a heartbeat
Only
60 players scored as many or more goals than Comeau last year.
80 players scored as many or more points than PAP last year.
So I’m not sure I’d say they are easily available.
by afrosupreme on Jun 8, 2011 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I'm thinking that
our plan has to be to get bigger forwards over time
doing a deal like this would help, and free us of two people who are probably in the way soon
you can’t tell me PAP + Comeau for Zibanejad wouldn’t be worth it
I think you're undervaluing PAP and Comeau.
If we packaged both of them, we could realistically land a decent Top 6 nhl forward right now. 2 3rd line players(say 1 average+ and 1 above average) for a top 6er is right to me. But 2 3rd liners for a prospect with top 6 upside and 3rd line downside is not something I want to do. One of them in the trade, fine, but both? No way, especially over a draft pick that we have no idea how good or average he’ll pan out.
Comeau
is also bigger than Zibanejad, who would likely end up as big as Comeau at best, so I’m not sure that’s a good reason.
I think those two would be a severe overpay for Zibanejad or anyone else in the 8 slot.
by afrosupreme on Jun 8, 2011 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
total swap
Give them Bailey for their eighth pick and trade our fifth pick for Nikitav Filatov.
by neologizer on Jun 8, 2011 4:00 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
actually i meant
Trade our 2008 #9 pick for their 2011 #8 pick and give them our 2011 #5 pick for their 2008 #6 pick……
by neologizer on Jun 8, 2011 4:03 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
no way
Bailey is part of TEH CORE and we cant trade him away like that. there is still a very high chance that bailey will be the player we hoped he would be when garth drafted him
SHOOT THE DAMN PUCK!!!
Bailey and the 5th for Filatov and the 8th?? We get worse with both deals...
If we packaged Bailey and the 5th, you could be talking about landing Brent Burns.
The Irony
I remember many an armchair GM going nuts that we didn’t pick Filatov (the Isles had the #5 pick) who was the 2008#6 and traded down and got Bailey 2008#9
On the gross draft scale its even: swap 2008 picks (+3 on draft order) for swapping 2011 pick s (-3 in draft order) all comes out even No?
Eaton, Comeau and pick
If we are to feel there is someone of value at 8, we’re going to have to give something of value back. Comeau, is coming of a good finish of the year, however we know his tendency to mishandle pucks in our end and the neutral zone, which end up as turnovers. Eaton, a solid defensemen, but we have plenty of defensemen coming up the line that he could go. The pick, depends on how much Columbus wants, but I wouldn’t go higher than pick 50, 2nd pick of the 2nd round for us. But I would offer pick 65, in the third round since we have two, with the 63rd as well.
Cozo scares me
If we could get Mika and Hamilton with the 5th and 8th pix I MIGHT part with Cozo, but I fear he will bite us in the ass down the road.
is it june twentyfriggin-fourth already…….?
"Seriously that's the last time you guys f#@%ing won?" -RSH (about beating the Penguins in '93)
Not a great fit with these two teams, but...
Comeau, Ness and the #5 overall pick for Columbus #8 overall pick and R.J. Umberger. Then with the #8 pick, take Ryan Murphy, Mika, or Dougie.
Since the going rate for acquiring negotiating rights is a 3rd round pick, would anyone else consider kicking the tires on Brad Richards rights? Ya know, fly him in, give him the tour and the hard sell, present a very good contract offer, and if he turns his nose up, flip his rights @ the draft. Might be worth the effort…wouldn’t it be sweet seeing him dish to J.T. on the powerplay?
Bailey
He looks like a 3rd line guy in our future.
Thanks for playing, everyone
Keep playing as you wish.
But I just wanted to say thanks for playing along with this exercise without going insane or beating each other up with “Your fantasy dream is crazy and mine is real and must happen NOW!” tiffs.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.
Gotta agree with afro for the most part, packaging Comeau and PAP for the 8th pick is crazy. Packaging Comeau or PAP and 1 of our 2nd's for it isn't that crazy. As some have said, it depends who's on the board.
I’d pacakage Comeau or PAP and our early 2nd rounder for the #8 if ZIbanejad, Siemens, or Oleksiak are on board because they fill needs and are lower risk higher reward picks. I personally don’t wanna touch Murphy and Baertchi because of their lack of size(Murphy’s D too) and our need for size. Strome probably too, but the gigantic 1-year jump wonder thing does make you question.
likely anyone worth the 8th pick is someone the Isles don't want to lose
Or to turn it around… if you’re Scott Howson, what do you ask for from Garth to give up the 8th pick?
Considering that the draft is very close from 5-12, you’re not moving up to five. You probably want the 34th pick as part of the return, rather than the 50th… and possibly both. And you want a ready player. So, you’re asking for something like Bailey, Comeau, or even Moulson, plus the two second-rounders.
I think the Isles would want to hold at least one of the two second-rounders, and while they might be persuaded to part with Bailey, I don’t see them subtracting either of the other guys. (Well… they may want to sell high on Comeau, though I think it would be an error.) And I think that the ONLY way this would happen from Garth’s POV is if, after the fourth pick, Couturier was still on the board.
The other, intriguing option… the Jackets could actually use a better goalie. Mason is really not that good. Garon is a reasonable back up, and that’s all. Would they be persuaded to give up the 8th pick if the Isles gave up either Poulin or Montoya, along with a lesser forward?
We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog
HAHAHAHAHA
You know? I actually forgot about him!
We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog
hey, Hey, HEY!
WE need a better goalie. Don’t you get rid of my Poulin!
When the Isles make us drink, we curse Milbury through a monocle and with our pinkies out. Lighthouse Hockey & Chivas-All Class.
Website:Lighthouse Hockey Twitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Jun 8, 2011 4:08 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
No way...
…do the Isles trade Poulin this offseason. He’s the most promising goalie prospect, right? The two big Euros aren’t bad, but there’s a good chance Poulin turns into a good #1 goalie and the other two do not. Montoya may be a good #1 goalie, but I don’t think that’s a certainty after half a season of good play…. I don’t know how happy Nabokov would be in CLB…. I think Isles need to keep Montoya for the present (shouldn’t count on Nabokov fitting in) and Poulin for the future.
by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 8, 2011 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions
talent and toughness win playoff series
I wouldnt get rid of a 21 year old Bailey, and i wouldnt get rid of Comeua, besides Okposo and the 4th liners he is the only O man who could throw a check, and with Hamonic being the only checker besides the occasional Jurcina on D with De Haan being the number one D prospect, the Isles cant afford to lose any toughness, if anything PA if a team would take him, they have enough skinny guys with Nielsen and Grabner, Isles need some game 7 type players and i think Comeua would come up with a few big goals in playoffs, always plays big vs their biggest rivals the Rangers
Hate to break this to you about Okposo, but he lays off the physicality.
PAP, Comeau, Moulson, and Hunter all throw more checks/gm then him. I’d say Okposo is around average physically as a forward right now. You’d expect more from a guy his size and like him, but nope. Not really physical.
he plays physical, but not rough
Okposo is never going to be a big hitter, I think… but he definitely mixes it up along the boards, in scrums, and does a good job in puck battles and in protecting the puck when he’s being checked. So he’s rugged without necessarily being a wrecking ball. In fact, I think of him providing needed grit.
We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog
He does provide some grit
But rarely throws checks that knock players off their skates. He doesn’t avoid contact, as Grabner does. He would rather strip a player of the puck and head the other way than crush the guy.
by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 9, 2011 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions
You guys put a better way. I wouldn't call him physical. I hear physical forward and I don't think KO's game.
But he does play gritty and moderately physically all around. Hitting is a big part of physicality, as is initiating contact in all facets of the game. Can’t say Okposo is physical really. If you called Okposo a physical player you’d have to call Moulson a physical player for similar reasons, and I just can’t label Moulson as a physical player.

by 










































