Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Monday Polling: On the #5 pick, on Ullstrom, on Brewer and Luongo

"Major Tom sees / Now the light commands / This is my home"

Lotta strands in Old Duder's head here. So rather than form coherent thoughts on each, we'll go with the lazy blogger's tried-and-true route asking you to discuss and react (and vote) to these five topics:

1) The #5 pick: We're on Monday of draft week. We've seen bits floated here, there and everywhere about the Garth Snow's willingness to shop that pick. To me it all reads like due diligence -- market-probing to see if someone is unloading a real player. If it moves at all, my money would be on a trade down on draft day. What's your gut say?

2) David Ullstrom: Ullstrom intrigues me (in a "two-way Swede" kind of way) more than your average Islanders fan, I suspect. The Isles official site has a write-up with him talking about his adjustments to North America at age 21, with quotes from Jack Capuano. Questions: Do you expect Ullstrom to be an NHLer? If so, when?

Star-divide

3) Eric Brewer and Sean Bergenheim: Brewer is said to be close to re-signing with the Lightning, after coming off a 4-year, $4.25 million cap hit deal signed in St. Louis. He had a wrecked back for much of his time with the Blues, but this year was a healthy year. Questions: Would you have bid on him to give the Isles another "top four" guy? (I might have, but not at that price.) And Bergenheim's not coming back, but would you bid if you were GM?

4) Forward upgrade? Timo Seppa has a neat piece at Hockey Prospectus trying to peg just one need to fill for each Atlantic team. For the Isles -- and sorry if you've heard this from me before -- it's a versatile forward. He suggests Eric Belanger, a good penalty killer and two-way player with some offensive touch. To me the argument for cutting Zenon Konopka loose -- despite his popularity -- is to upgrade forwards 1-12. Share his and other roles with better, more versatile players. I know everyone dreams of another dynamic scorer, but they just aren't available on the market or via non-back-breaking trade. Q: For next year, what kind of forward do you think the Isles need?

5) Roberto Luongo: scapegoat or actual soul-sucking sad panda? I have noted that I'm not a big fan of Roberto Luongo here -- but not because of some mistrust in his skills; I think he's one of the top five goalies in the game over the last several years. Contrary to reputation, he has won "big games." But he's also looked quite a mess in some memorable big ones, too -- like just about any goalie. As a fan, I just don't trust him: His mopy body language when times are tough, and his truly bizarre "It's an easy save for me ... I've been pumping his tires all series" follow-up comments regarding Tim Thomas just screamed of a very popular and well-paid player with some crazy insecurities. Add that to the weird captaincy soap opera in the Luongo Head file.

So he didn't get it done in the finals -- but again, his counterpart just put up one of the most amazing goaltending seasons (and playoffs, with some implosions) in history. As a fan I don't really like the player, but as a cold observer I'd still share blame for the Canucks falling just short on offense drying up, defense banged up, and important forwards trying to play through injuries. Question: How much blame do you put on Luongo versus the other factors?

Discuss.

Polls and Bits

While we're polling, you may have noticed the weekly "how are you feeling about the Islanders?" poll is open again, cross-posted below. The needle hasn't moved much recently, for obvious reasons, but I bet it will change one way or the other between this week and next.

Scott Gordon joins the Leafs: He and fellow U.S. coach Ron Wilson always seemed to get along. FanShot discussion of Gordon here.

LHH Mock Draft: Our Mock Draft at Lighthouse Hockey is steaming along. Check this post for the first 28 picks with links to each pick's rationale. Expect the 29th pick to be ready by Tuesday evening.

Opinion-surfing: I usually enjoy Isles blog NYI FYI, and here's some quick musings on the Gillies re-signing and the third jersey rumors.

UPDATE: Islanders Draft Party. If you're going to the Islanders Draft Party at the Coliseum and want to meet other LHHers, discuss in CharlieIsles comments below. (This came up a bit in this post where ArsenalLI, ogam5, Bryan2112 and DarthDoyle volunteered their participation.)

Poll
A few days before the 2011 NHL Draft, what's your gut on the Isles' 5th overall pick?
The Isles will stand pat and select a player at #5.
338 votes
The Isles will trade up for a top three pick.
32 votes
The Isles will trade down and party like it's 2008.
79 votes
The Isles will swap the pick for an established NHLer.
30 votes

479 votes | Poll has closed

Islanders Fan Confidence Poll

Last tallied on 06/22.

21|1:|0|100&chxt=x,y&chco=5098c7&chd=t:54

more regional sports SB Nation New York

Comment 173 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Re: Islanders draft party

There might be another place to post this, but anyone planning on attending the draft party at the coliseum Friday? My brother, cousin and I went last year and had fun. Both Matt Moulson and Trevor Gilles were there (John Tavares was also there I believe), and it was kind of cool to walk around the ice area and get to see the banners up close.

You can get free tickets from ticketmaster.

Proud to root for the Jets, Mets, and Islanders!!!

by CharlieIsles on Jun 20, 2011 12:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Keep posting these

Sorry, I meant to include a link to the original discussion in this post. I’ll do that and note people who have already said they are going.

I won’t be…I’ll be in St. Paul for the NHL’s dog and pony show.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll be there

I’ll be attending the season ticket holder meet and greet with Tavares, Moulson, Grabner, and Gillies from 5:30 – 6 in the Backstage Cafe downstairs I think and then staying for the draft party, at least through the Islanders pick. Should be there with some family, possibly some friends.

by dunnowhat2type on Jun 20, 2011 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm one of those!

TMC did you get my email on season tix? I’m going to purchase this week I think, before the draft.

"Seriously that's the last time you guys f#@%ing won?" -RSH (about beating the Penguins in '93)

by Bryan2112 on Jun 20, 2011 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes you are! :)

Hope to see you again on Friday.
However as far as tix go I have not been able to get my friend to go in for season tix with me, which really sucks. :(

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Jun 20, 2011 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ironic

My dad wants to go in with me now. Sorry to hear that. Let me know if anything changes, but I guess it’s just me and pop now.

"Seriously that's the last time you guys f#@%ing won?" -RSH (about beating the Penguins in '93)

by Bryan2112 on Jun 20, 2011 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I am probably going by myself and meeting my friends when they get out of work

which kinda stinks. So, if anyone and their friends are gonna be anywhere in particular and wanna possibly meet up, my email is my name at aol- but I have a dumb phone (as opposed to a smart phone) so Im all about the texting & actual phone calls… so if you write to me and tell me who you are, I can then be contacted. :)

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Jun 20, 2011 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

e-mail is name @ gmail

I have “smart” phone and will get e-mails, We can meet by the Trevor Gillies moustache stand, wherever that is. Last year, the moustaches weren’t comfortable as moustaches, so I wore it as a beard. Anywhere is fine.

by dunnowhat2type on Jun 21, 2011 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

"We Can Meet by the Trevor Gillies Moustache Stand"

Wasn’t that song used in Casablanca?

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 21, 2011 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

LOL

Love the username, dunnowwhat2type. Made my afternoon.

Gives me an idea for a child’s name, hmm…

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

i'll give it a go...from bottom up...

5), yes, Luongo is partially to blame. He’s a big boy in a men’s game and is paid the big bucks. he didn’t deliver, nuff said….as for Tim Thomas, while I agree he earned the MVP, I think it HAS BEEN LOST that Vancouver won ALL THE CLOSE ONE GOAL AND OVERTIME GAMES that Thomas kept Boston in. BOSTON’S FOUR WINS, WERE ALL BLOWOUTS. 8-1, 5-2, AND 4-0 TWICE. You score 8 goals in a playoff game, you win. You score five, you will almost always win. You score 4, your going to win most playoff games.

4) forward upgrade…not as important as defense. Nino will be on the team next year, barring signing or trade, b/c he is a top nine forward in our system. What Isles need to add is a second line centre, preferably a big physical right centre as that helps fill multiple needs. Moulson, Grabner, Nino, Pap, Comea and KO give us a decent six pack of top nine wingers….plus JT and Franz…but, it is far more probable that a second line centre emerge from the system than it is a big right D emerge from system as of today…so if a trade is made, forcus tradable assets on D.

3) Yes and No. As I posted prior, I think Brewer would be an ideal linemate for Hamonic, and performed unbelievably well when paired with big Alex Peterangelo in world Juniors. Of Course, Brewer would have to be healthy, but if it happened…might be good for fans as well, being Brewer was former first rounder…

2) read that last night or this morning….Ullstrom is definately an interesting prospect…gives us bottom 6 prospect depth…

1) This is the first draft in my life time, and I’ve been watching the draft for nearly 3 decades, where any of the four options you posed Dom, could all be realistic options in the right circumstances. As long as the pick fills a hole, with a young player who will play for Isles for a long time….

was thinking the other day….if all prospects were to pan out, Isles future team looks something like this as of today:

Forwards

Nino -——JT——Kabanov
Grabner—- Nielson——KO
Lee——-Nelson——-Petrov
Cizikas——Ullstrom————Martin

Defense

de Haan -— Hamonic
 Amac—————?
????—————-Donavon

Goal

Poulin
Nelson
Koskinen

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 1:05 PM EDT reply actions  

One problem with that lineup

I like our forward corps, it’s full of promising offensive and skilled two-way centers (not that that is a problem). But there’s not a lot of crunch, you know guys who will throw the big hit. You could potentially draft or acquire defensemen to fill that hole, but losing a defensemen for 5 minutes at a time could be painful, and there’s always the risk of defensemen rocking the shit out of someone else but in the process falling out of position (think Kasparaitis). There’s also defensemen who could throw the body and not lose his position (Scott Stevens, for example) but I think it might be safer to throw in a brawler as a forward (Martin can hit, but he’s not much of a fighter… I remember one game this season I think against St. Louis where he dropped the gloves but really all they did was dance).

by sayvillelax94 on Jun 20, 2011 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

i’d say there is more than a few problems with that lineup. definately some holes, and not all will panout, but there is also definately some very good young players in there, and certainly a number of the prospects will panout, just as certain as some won’t.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Crunch

I don’t know. I look at that and see Nino on line 1, Lee on line 3, Cizikas and Martin on line 4 as guys who will throw hits. (Line 2 seems to be just fine without delivering many hits.)

Not that this lineup will pan out in the end, but in terms of ideal ceilings it has the ingredients to make me happy.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Impact of 2011 Draft and UFA/RFA signings

First, those are some ideas on lines but I agree there are some significant issues with the lineup. First and foremost is there is only one right handed shooting wing on the whole lineup. That won’t work.

Excluding Nino and Martin it is not a very hard hitting lineup.

What UFA/RFA or draft pick would you add to the mix?

What have you done to BC, and JB? BC still has value and JB may require a little patience.

by TheMagus on Jun 20, 2011 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe he pawned them

To fill some of those ______ on the blueline?

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kabanov, Martin and KO are all righties. But yes, a right centre and another rightie winger would be nice.

I think there are a number of forwards in that mix that due bring the physicality, as Dom wrote above and I responded. Not every player will be offense and positional defense, just as not all will be bangers…need a good mix. but i do think we have several young bangers in system…

Bailey I left off…, but Comeau was intentional. I was focusing on the future, not present, and assuming for sake of argument all hit their ceiling. Neilson is the only player I listed who was drafted prior to the 2008 rebuild. I don’t expect to see Comeau around in 3 to 4 years when Isles will be contenders again. I hope he is useful for development of prospects, and good trade bate.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Corrected

Kabanov plays left wing but shoots right. Martin shoots left and KO shoots right. Comeau shoots right but likes the left wing.

by TheMagus on Jun 20, 2011 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

close...Martin shoots right...

i put them on the “proper shootingside” as opposed to “off-wing” for two reasons. Simply analysis, and, i suspect some of these guys will be moved to the proper wing when they enter NHL for defensive reasons. Travis Green (Nino’s coach) speculated as much on Nino – stating he may not be able to cut across from offwing in NHL like he does in Junior.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

....let's see what happens with Haley up a full season first.......

……I still think he’s good for 10-20 goals and 10-20 assists on the right line; he certainly deserves further consideration as does Martin…..

by ogam5 on Jun 20, 2011 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

From Islander website

Matt Martin
Left Wing – NYI
(MAHR-tihn)
Video ›
Number: 17
Height: 6’ 3"
Weight: 210
Shoots: Left
Born: May 8, 1989 (Age 22)
Birthplace: Windsor, ON, Canada

by TheMagus on Jun 20, 2011 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Huh?

Martin plays left wing, but he definately shoots right…Kabanov has been listed as a left shot for years on HF Boards, but he is a righty..

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

holy shiite

Isles’ site does have Martin listed as a left shot…but everywhere else he’s listed as a righty…

one link…

http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=96752

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Definitely shot left

….when he gloved the puck down to his stick just outside of the crease for that highlight goal…. Maybe he switches?

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 20, 2011 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

hey Magnus

just looked it up on youtube video, your right, Martin is a left shot…yet various list him as a righty? not that he was projected as a front liner, but i wondered why a bottom liner would be playing off wing – usually offensive guys are allowed that….

anyway, even though Martin was top liner, that just shows even more how thin Isles are in righty forwards….Petrov is also a left, but likes the right wing….that means after Pap and Comeau and KO, we have Kabanov, Rhak and Day as pretty much the only righties in the system.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Islanders Web Site

I just hope the Islanders web site is correct which is where I finally confirmed.

Kabanov is a year away.
Rakh is probably the next right wing up but is smallish.
Day I have no information on.

Bottom line is our right side is a little weak compared to the bounty we have at center and left wing.

Adding a Strome or Mika to our team could give us a big boost.

by TheMagus on Jun 20, 2011 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

yep

Isles are weak when it comes to right forwards, and right D…Coliton is the top right centre as of now…Mika and Strome can both play the wing too…i agree with you…if snow roles the dice on strome, the payoff is huge if strome pansout…there’s that billion dollar word though, IF

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's the kind of risk

It takes to get a Bossy. (or not)

This IS the year.

by since70too on Jun 20, 2011 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

yep

when the question was raised to gamble on lanky non-physical bossy, who had a reputation for not showing up every night in juniors, or a defensive forward, was it not arbour who argued for bossy, stating he could teach a scorer defense, but can’t teach a defensive player to score…that is why i will not be suprise if Snow takes Strome…if Strome pans out, the payoff for Isles is huge…HUGE…

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

All signs seem to point to either Strome or Zibanejad

It just makes too much sense. I understand that it very well could be Hamilton, but when you have a chance to draft a need like #2 center, and this is your last lottery pick for awhile, and your team is short on talented RHers…

Tradeup/use your 2nds on a D

"Seriously that's the last time you guys f#@%ing won?" -RSH (about beating the Penguins in '93)

by Bryan2112 on Jun 20, 2011 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

All things being equal

…I’d rather see Isles go with the 6’4" LHer center, Couturier. To me, size is more attractive right now than RHer…. But chances are that Isles like Strome or Couturier or Zibanejad better than the other two and will go with that player despite being LH or impressively large…. What about the 6’1" 170 lb LH Huberdeau or the 6’0" 160 lb LH RNH? Chances are both will be taken before #5, but would Isles take a small LH center if he were the best player available?

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 21, 2011 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

How about this?

Draft Couturier and use our 2 picks on some right handed wingers or defenseman out their.

Will that work?

Also, I would, after the draft, still consider going after Grudbranson. Heck, why not?

by TheMagus on Jun 21, 2011 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Man, I'd go after him too if he were actually available

Still hard to believe the Cats won’t get it done though.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 22, 2011 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

like your analysis,...

Petrov and Brock Nelson hit too no? one non-physical line, with Nino banging on first line and a 3rd and fourth physical line, that’s not bad. Not a bad balance. Wasn’t even necessarily thinking about physicality at the moment. I did miss a few like Bailey, who I believe will put in his 400 games, whether he reaches his ceiling or not.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nino, Lee, Nelson, Martin, are all physical hitting players.

Petrov is said to be “physical” and getting more physical. Cizikas I don’t know about being physical, gritty yes, but a frequent hitter I am not sure. We should really be fine physically with that combo of lines as it has a ton of size and physicality everywhere but our speedy checking 2nd line, which doesn’t need it. I like the forward lines. We really need some size and physicality on D though, no question there.

by OzzyFan on Jun 20, 2011 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kinda Sorta

Nino is absolutely a physical presence who will drop the gloves. Cizikas is a pest of a player but small. Nelson and Lee are years away from clearly designating them physical.

My concern is our top two lines have no physical presence. If Nino joins the 3rd line that helps there. The fourth line will have some combination of Hunter, Haley, and Martin which is fine. We need a player or two up top to protect our top line players.

This is where a Mika comes in. Having him next to JT would be really interesting.

by TheMagus on Jun 20, 2011 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

A guy who is nearly 200 lbs is not "small"

He isnt “big” either but that doesnt mean he is “small”. Every player is not one extreme or the other.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Jun 20, 2011 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

And, what do we mean designating Lee and Nelson physical?

Lee is touted to throw “bone-jarring hits” and play “physical”, so he’s a pretty damn safe bet there for being physical at the nhl level. Nelson is touted to have a “very solid physical game”, so I think he will be pretty physical too. And both Lee and Nelson are projected to be 220lbs+ at the nhl level and mobile. So if they aren’t gonna be physical that the nhl level, then something very very very wrong happened in their development, because all signs point to them being 2 huge mobile physical players.

by OzzyFan on Jun 21, 2011 1:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure nino

Has only dropped the gloves once…and it didnt go well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbMQULCnNaQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player

If he fights often he’s gonna end up looking like Kasparaitis.

When the Isles make us drink, we curse Milbury through a monocle and with our pinkies out. Lighthouse Hockey & Chivas-All Class.
Website:Lighthouse Hockey Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Jun 21, 2011 9:15 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Assessments

In all of the reviews of Nelson and Lee I have reach while they are big they are not physical players.

Nelson summary
http://www.andrewsstarspage.com/index.php/site/comments/nhl_draft_brock_nelson_profile/

Lee
http://forecaster.thehockeynews.com/hockeynews/hockey/player.cgi?6787

http://www.maxpreps.com/athletes/JfGXy6-6-k6fd9fuZPSLTQ/football-fall-08/stats-anders-lee.htm

I also checked to see if fights and they are certainly not fighters. I checked Hockeyfights on each player and only Lee has one fight. There is no video but the only commentary is he held his opponent to a draw.

by TheMagus on Jun 21, 2011 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not very often that fights happen in NCAA right?

Seems to be far more prevalent in the CHL/Jrs

When the Isles make us drink, we curse Milbury through a monocle and with our pinkies out. Lighthouse Hockey & Chivas-All Class.
Website:Lighthouse Hockey Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Jun 21, 2011 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here:

Anders Lee delivers bone jarring hits and is physical:
http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/anders_lee

Nelson has a very solid physical game that opens up the play that works well for him:
http://www.andrewsstarspage.com/index.php/site/comments/nhl_draft_brock_nelson_profile/

And on the fighting, you fight in college and get a 1gm suspension minimum on your 1st offense, and more games after that. So it kills pretty much a ton of fighting there:
http://insidecollegehockey.com/7Archives/Features/intro/rules.htm

by OzzyFan on Jun 21, 2011 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait

None of those reports say anything of the kind of them not playing physically. As a matter of fact, that third one is his HS football statistics. (Which probably indicate he is at least willing to absorb contact.) I guess we have that definition of “physical” to contend with again. Are they Okposo physical (absorb contact/battle along the boards) or Haley physical (initiate contact/go to the net/traffic).

Time will tell of course, but either way, I’m sure we’re not drafting for guys who can fight in the first couple of rounds…those guys can be added later.

When the Isles make us drink, we curse Milbury through a monocle and with our pinkies out. Lighthouse Hockey & Chivas-All Class.
Website:Lighthouse Hockey Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Jun 21, 2011 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

You know what we keep forgetting about the 4th line?

Colliton. I’m pretty sure he was a beast on face-offs also last season and may have helped to make Konopka expendable. Colliton/Haley/Martin/Gillies works for me, and now I am more comfortable. I don’t think Colliton is signed, but if they do, that ensures that Cizikas and Ullstrom continue to develop and DiBo can be the first call up if JC gets hurt with Haley sliding into the C.

When the Isles make us drink, we curse Milbury through a monocle and with our pinkies out. Lighthouse Hockey & Chivas-All Class.
Website:Lighthouse Hockey Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Jun 21, 2011 9:04 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Colliton is a UFA

So we’ll see if he comes back

"I bet Calgary wishes they had a backup goalie as their GM" - Pauly C
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Jun 21, 2011 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yep

But he killed penalties at roughly the same rate as Konopka (1:14/1:32) (Dobber Hockey Comparison) and small sample size alert, did have the highest faceoff winning percentage on the team at 61.9% and obviously took a buttload less penalties.

When the Isles make us drink, we curse Milbury through a monocle and with our pinkies out. Lighthouse Hockey & Chivas-All Class.
Website:Lighthouse Hockey Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Jun 21, 2011 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

That player you hate to play against (in the traditional sense)

Meaning a Trottier/Toews/Richards at forward, or a Potvin/Pronger/Chara on D. I wonder which of these prospects you’ve listed could be like THAT kind of player for the Isles. So far, I think Cizikas has some of that in him, and Hamonic as well. Dunno about Brock Nelson yet.

That’s why I’m so high on Zibanejad, cuz he projects as that type of player.

"Seriously that's the last time you guys f#@%ing won?" -RSH (about beating the Penguins in '93)

by Bryan2112 on Jun 20, 2011 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

love Zibanejad

out of that list, the one player not mentioned yet that may fit that bill is Lee…i think anyway

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Several weeks of mulling

And Mika remains one of the non-top 5(?) or late risers I’d feel most comfortable with.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

What about Commeau?

He is young – scored 24 – good size – still developing

by altosax on Jun 20, 2011 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

i liken Bailey to Wayne Merrick of Dynasty Isles...

if Bailey is a number 2 centre, Isles will be well off and will be able to focus more on D and wing. However, if Bailey is a consistant 40-50 point man, scoring the odd 20 goal season, 3 second line centres and one number 1 may not be all bad.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nielsen

Thank goodness we have Nielsen to play with the speed kills line of FUNGO.

Now image we select either Couturier or Mika to play center for the second line. Bailey then drops to fourth or is trade bait. Nielsen moves next to NN and BC and we have three dynamic lines. Or we keep Bailey on the third line and have Mika protect JT by moving him to the right wing. Which means PAP is on the block.

by TheMagus on Jun 20, 2011 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Isles select Couturier

… there may be a logjam for this upcoming season, because Couturier seems ready for the NHL after 3 seasons of juniors. Tavares could move to the wing, but who plays 1st line center? Nielsen could, but I’d like to see him with Grabner more. Perhaps Nielsen, Grabner, and JT on the 1st line? That would leave Moulson for the 2nd line with some combo of PA, KO, Couturier, Bailey. And two of remaining on 3rd line…. It will be interesting if they choose a center who is NHL-ready, because they’ll have four top-9 centers and Bailey/Nielson don’t look comfortable on the wing from what I’ve seen.

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 20, 2011 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Couturier creates three solid lines

Move Nielsen to the third line between Nino and Comeau.
Add Couturier between Grabner and KO. I hate to break up the chemistry but this creates a lot of depth.
Lastly, move Bailey to the 4th line between Martin and Hunter. Bailey becomes a PK specialist and slowly learns the game with no pressure on him.

Now we need to find a RW for JT.

by TheMagus on Jun 20, 2011 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bailey needs ice time, and ice time with appropriate linemates to develop. Franz is a third line centre, JT a first. On the fourth line with role and energy players, i just don’t see this helping Bailey’s development, particularly with the limited ice time he would get.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

There is nothing wrong with our top 6 fwd’s. I see Nino replacing PA on the top line. Drop PA to the third line in between bailey and comeau. Thats if Bailey sticks around. He could very well be the odd man out. Pretty soon, with all these kids developing…we can use alot of pieces for trade bait.

But dont mess with the chemistry. That 2nd line is gona be great. Kyle Okposo and Frans Nielsen are two of the best defensive forwards in the league and the ability to move the puck into the nuetral zone and up the ice is great for the way grabner plays with his ability for the break away.

by mdesarmo on Jun 21, 2011 8:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Did someone say logjam?


/sorry but no, no I will never grow up nor stop quoting Lebowski.

I’d really love to get a guy who will be special but can spend one more year getting better in juniors.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's the clip on the screen in Big Lebowski when he visits Maude
[Maude shows the skin flick video starring Bunny to the Dude]
Sherry in ‘Logjammin’: [on video] You must be here to fix the cable.
Maude Lebowski: Lord. You can imagine where it goes from here.
The Dude: He fixes the cable?
Maude Lebowski: Don’t be fatuous, Jeffrey.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 21, 2011 2:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

if Isles did choose Couturier, and started him in the NHL...

it would most likely be as a winger, or third line centre. JT and Nielson are two good at a difficult position to move to wing in favour of lesser players, plus Nielson is a defensive centre, JT is here for offense.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Savy Leadership

Missing are the leaders that have been there and done that. The Isles need that one or two players to teach them how to win when the going gets tough. These would not be cheap vets, but they would be invaluable to the moulding of the mindset of our young core.

by Katzenhammer on Jun 20, 2011 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Islanders definitely need to draft someone with the name; Nelsen, Nilssen or Nielsson this year just to make things even more complicated..

by DavidSweden on Jun 20, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Number 4 sounds interesting...

While I don’t see him as a long term Islander, he could come at a lower cost and two PK lines headed by Frans and Belanger would be nearly impossible to beat.

by sayvillelax94 on Jun 20, 2011 1:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Belanger

…sounds like an upgrade from Konopka. It would be good to have another great penalty killer (and a center who can win faceoffs too), but Comeau and Bailey weren’t bad on the PK this past season. Okposo is pretty good too, especially as he gets back to 100%. Belanger would be good, but I agree that adding a top-4 defenseman would be better (bigger need now), pushing Jurcina to #5 so that the 3rd pairing would be able to match up with most opposing lines.

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 20, 2011 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hockey Prospectus

They also want the Flyers to trade for Nabokov

Vote Yes on August 1st.

by Anarcurt on Jun 20, 2011 1:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Fortunately it's too late for that

I kind of like them signing Ilya and going long with him for big money. I like him, but he’s no sure thing.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is it a sure thing?

Not official, but are Flyers just waiting until June 30th salary cap expansion until they can sign Bryzgalov?… Unless Bryz signs overseas, it doesn’t matter too much to Isles where he signs, in regards to Nabokov. Bryz signing is one less spot in the NHL for a goalie. But there are other teams that can use Nabokov, especially for under $1 million.

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 20, 2011 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not a sure thing

But he’s doing a lot of Philly-based tweeting as if he expects to be a Flyer. I would just feel good about them paying too much for Bryz versus us selling Nabby to him for pennies and Nabby actually helping them in a cap-friendly way.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

All-in-one

1. I agree that he Isles would be better served to take the 5th, or trade down…. but with so much equivilent talent in the top 10 it will be hard to get more than a third for the swap (at least that’s what I think). It will take great consideration to trade down this year because they really need one of tow players organizationally that could fall below 5. A swap that puts them at 8 or below (to get a second) might miss both. But the consolation would still be a very good player and a another dart in a deep draft. I think I’d take Hamilton or Courturier with #5.
2. Ullstrom will be INTHE NHL this year… I don’t know if he’ll stick this year (HIGHLY DOUBTFUL BARRING INJURIES), but I think he will be an NHLer, eventually compiling more than 400 games…. I havea feeling he and Katic may be the two most coveted trading chips at the bridge. I don’t think Snow wants to give away the two Denver prospects (Rakh and Donovan)… and CDH isn’t going anywhere. He might even go on draft day if they can get an NHL defenseman for him. More likely he straddles the A/NHL fence this year and is traded with other assets next year for that “final piece”
3. Brewer is a tough call. I’m not sure I’d even make an offer if the starting length is 3 YRS. Back injuries don’t just go away… and the support that makes you play “healthy” one year can come crashing down at some point, and the last thing they need is another $5M+ contract sitting in the tub for a few years. Bergenheim will command $1.2-1.5M for 3YRS. No, he’s not going to be a 20+ goal scorer every year… but he has a motor, and in the right situations he will produce good minutes for any NHL team.
4. The ISlanders need a top four defender way more than they need a “veratile forward”. They have Ullstrom, Rakhshani, Dibo and/or Joensuu who will get NHL time this year. They have a core of 10 forwards returning from last year, plus Nino, Hunter and Haley who will comprise a solid top 12… right behind that group is Kabanov, Petrov, Lee, Nelson. They have a solid group of young defenders, but one veteran top four defender in Streit, and only MacDonald that will be over 25 if Streit leaves after next year. Without Streit they will have Hamonic and MacDonald and a lot of question marks again. That one piece to be looking for this year is a minute munching defender… preferably over 210lbs with some mean.
5. I really don’t see why it is necessary to put Luongo on the grill. Tim Thomas won the Stanley Cup more than any individual Canuck lost it…. and as a whole, the Bruins won the series more than the Canucks lost it. If there was an ex-Islander in that series that I would like to talk about it is Z. Instead of Luongo choking, how about talking about the HOF hockey player that Z has become. He has become the best Milbury draft pick/ex-isle, and maybe the best Islander draft pick in the last 20 years. I know this wasn’t about EX-Islandrs… but I couldn’t care less about Roberto Luongo… except when discussing the the most franchise damaging series of events in Islander history.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Jun 20, 2011 1:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Following along with your sentiment

I was actually proud of Big Z. Couldn’t help, but cheer for a guy that started out as a novelty and became a great hockey player through hard work and dedication to the sport. There was no way I would have predicted he would become the player he is today when the Islanders traded him. I honestly thought he would peak at a number 3/4 shutdown defensman, a Hal Gill and never much more and he has certainly proven me wrong. I’m not pissed that he did, in fact, I’m glad he has become what he is because he seems to have earned it. Luckily, I wasn’t as wrong as Ottawa choosing Redden over Chara.

Nassau Coliseum lost a veteran and an original Islander fan. ACC 1918-2011

by Hockey1919 on Jun 20, 2011 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

i remember...

when Chara was a prospect, reading that he got a part time job at a car dealership washing the tops of vans. Chara didn’t need a ladder. lol

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Luckily, I wasn’t as wrong as Ottawa choosing Redden over Chara.

Its so true.

I love Big Z- I am so happy for him.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Jun 20, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Chara

may be best Isles drafted D since Denis Potvin, and those are not small words…damn, he would fill a huge hole for Isles now…

not sold on Thomas winning the cup for Boston. Boston lost the overtime and one goal games. All three of them. Boston’s four wins were all blowouts, 8-1, 5-2, and 4-0 twice. You score that often in a cup final, you’d better win those games.

Had Boston lost the cup after four games like that, the Bruins would need to find a better goalie.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

2nd part, dont agree...

Those were OT and 1-goal games BECAUSE of the outstanding play of Thomas

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Jun 20, 2011 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

Those close games wouldn’t have gotten that far without Thomas. Faulting him for giving up the deciding goal in low-scoring games is just as off as faulting Luongo for not winning “clutch” games or whatever. On the whole, Thomas and the B’s had a better series — but the difference was narrow.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

not blaming Thomas for the 3 close one goal losses, merely saying, takes four wins to win series, and the four games Boston won were blowouts. one could argue as goals went in, Vancouver had to open up even more – thus exposing themselves…but in the end, most of the elite goalies would have won that series with goal support like that in four games. I think that has to be part of any discussion on this years cup final. Vancouver never seemed to even be on the same ice in the three games played in Boston. To me, that means we can not justifibly say Boston won the series b/c of Tim Thomas. Vancouver proved they could win the close games. Offense is what produces lopsided blowouts.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 20, 2011 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Boston was just willing to swap chances

We talked a little about this in the “Defense & Goaltending” fanshot… Boston lost the close games and won the blowouts, which is not indicative of a defense-first approach. It also plays into an observation I made in a comment some time ago, that an elite goalie makes more of a difference in a wide-open league than a tight-checking league: more scoring chances means more opportunities for your elite guy to outplay their average guy. To that end, it looked to me like Boston decided to turn the finals into a goaltending contest – trade chances and let Thomas make more of a difference than Luongo. When it worked, it worked like gangbusters.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Jun 20, 2011 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is what Edmonton did with Grant Fuhr. Knowing they could trade chances forever and not worry about poor goaltending undoing their eight goal per game offense.

Nassau Coliseum lost a veteran and an original Islander fan. ACC 1918-2011

by Hockey1919 on Jun 20, 2011 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Chara/Jonsson

I know Kenny Jonsson was drafted by the Leafs, but he and Chara were the best Isles D-men I remember— since around 93-94. (Aucoin may have came close one season.)

At his best, Jonsson was extremely smooth and steady. I can’t think of a defenseman who was better positionally in his own zone than Kenny. (Best defensively I can think of without being known as “physical”— wasn’t a “hitter”.)

Around the same time, Rangers were awful too. I watched some of their games because (1) it was fun to see them lose and (2) it was fun to watch Brian Leetch. Rangers would make a lot of dumb plays and Leetch would make a lot of really good plays to bail them out. It reminded me of Jonsson on the Islanders. Leetch was more offensive, but I would argue that, at his best, Jonsson had the same redeeming presence on the ice that Leetch had. It was amazing to watch.

I would take Chara in his prime over Jonsson in his prime, but it would be close. Chara would make more mistakes (as we saw in the Finals), but his size makes up for that.

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 20, 2011 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kenny Jonsson was a great player

After the lockout he just stayed in Sweden. Retired now, but I think he’s younger than I am, and could have still played at a high level on the Island.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Jun 20, 2011 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kenny Jonnson was the best defensmen the Isles had since the 80’s. Unfortunatly his concussions limited him. On a great team he would have been a norris candidate. Gosh…if everyone was healthy in that leafs series…that was such a great team.

We could grab another swedish defensmen who is being compared to jonnson in larsson at the draft. Kenny still plays at a highest level. He won the 2006 olympic equivelent to the norris.

Him and Hamrlik were such a great duo. Aucoin is still producing too.

by mdesarmo on Jun 20, 2011 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I remember being outraged

That “analysts” would constantly put down Jonnson when the trade deadline came around (since there was always a chance he might go). They’d say “He’s great on the Island, but on another team he’d just be a quality 3rd pairing guy” pissed me off so much.

"I bet Calgary wishes they had a backup goalie as their GM" - Pauly C
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Jun 20, 2011 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

the same analysts

in the likes of Mike MIlbury? The same guy who destroyed our franchise and set us back 15 yrs with stupid moves and impatience?

He constantly bashed Luongo and was just so biased on the bruins run for the cup…as they do deserve it no doubt.

And too how good Kenny Jonnson actually was, NHL.com did a 1-30 on the best draft picks for their respective selection number of all time. Kenny Jonnson was the runner up for best 12th overall pick. He had to be a pretty decent hockey player than

by mdesarmo on Jun 21, 2011 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Sometimes I wonder

if those concussions didn’t play a role in that too. I imagine the Swedish leagues are somewhat less physical than the NHL.

by afrosupreme on Jun 20, 2011 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also

Milbury doesn’t speak Swedish.

"I bet Calgary wishes they had a backup goalie as their GM" - Pauly C
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Jun 20, 2011 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sarcasm?

There are four other HOF Islander draft picks after #5 (Trottier, Bossy, Gillies and Lafontaine). Once you’ve achieved that status then it’s just nit picking in my opinion.
What I really can’t agree with (if you didn’t intend it as sarcasm) is that Tim Thomas was not a HUGE factor in the Bruins winning the cup. He kept them in all but [I think, too busy to check] 3 games in the playoffs. He was, by far, the best player on the ice during the finals.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Jun 20, 2011 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Move up
but with so much equivilent talent in the top 10 it will be hard to get more than a third for the swap (at least that’s what I think)

wouldn’t that also be a good reason to move up to get who we want, since in theory it shouldn’t cost a whole lot?

by afrosupreme on Jun 20, 2011 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you project to 2008

If Larsson falls to #2… and all Florida wants is a second rounder for the swap, then if we project that deal to the 2008 draft:
Is 2:Drew Doughty(Larsson) worth 5:Schenn(Hamilton) and 34:Jake Allen/(???)? In that scenario, YES.
The way our prospects are becoming productive Islanders, I think the loss of a second round dart could be throwing away a Corey Trivino(Make the deal) or a Travis Hamonic(would be a mistake).
So the logic falls in your favor to trade down when your scouts are doing a good job of evaluating secondary talent. It could also give you a bigger net to catch fallers like Kabanov and Petrov.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Jun 20, 2011 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

The ex-Isled B's

I agree on both Brewer and Bergenheim — both players on their face would help the Islanders, but both at their likely term (Brewer) and asking price (Bergenheim) are non-starters in my book. I accept you have to pay extra shopping at the UFA store, but you need to be special in order to deserve it.

Depending on defensive health/performance, if the Islanders don’t upgrade the 4th line and don’t figure out the key to the Bailey-Comeau-Blank enigma then I think they’ll be missing forwards who can help their defense.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cost

They will cost too much for this time and we would not get the value needed. Further, Brewer would just another defenseman to the mix who is not a PP specialist or big hitter.

We need a top two defenseman to fill the bill and not force Travis to play the role prematurely.

by TheMagus on Jun 20, 2011 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Snow Boarding...

If there is a big white board in Snow’s office I’m guessing it looks something like this:
2012-13 projections: (Locked in long term through 2015)
Moulson-Tavares-(1)
Grabner-Nielsen(hopefully)-Okposo
(2)-Bailey(hopefully)-(3)
(4)-(5)-(6)
A. Nino, Kabanov, Petrov (Top 6 <25 forwards)
B. Ullstrom, Lee, Nelson (middle 6 <25 forwards)
C. Martin, Haley, Cizikas, Rakhshani (bottom 6 <25 forwards)
D. Comeau, Parentau, Hunter (>25 utility forwards)

So when I sit down at the draft table this is what the chair I’m sitting on is made of. That is a pretty comfortable chair with a few buttons loose. But you have plenty of buttons to trade for a more stable button, because you also have the asset of CAP SPACE… what you don’t have is teh LUXURY of UNLIMITED BUDGET.

The defenseman chair only has three legs… so it would be smart for them to trade a cushion from one chair for a leg of another. They can even afford a cushion and a defensive caster (Kohn?) for a guy who is going to ruin somebody elses cap charts… but can still be productive for 3-5 years.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Jun 20, 2011 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can sit on that chair

But in terms of the upcoming season (yeah, I’m gonna call it “upcoming” even though I haven’t gotten through the draft or my “sit unconscious on the beach” phase), the clearest opportunity and need I see — barring buyouts/waiving of their weakest NHL-contracted D-men — is upgrading the bottom forwards and alleviating pressure on the top.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fat Bottom Balance

I think the Isles get a bottom upgrade with guys like Haley, Ullstrom and Rakhshani getting more time. You have Hunter coming back so you have to factor in available games to bring somebody else into the mix. Here are some factors which would keep me from overspending on bottom six forward:
1. Kabanov gets his 9 games. Highly doubtful he gets a 10th, but a strong camp and 5+ goals could make him un-demotable. Bottom line is that he will probably get 9 games… and if the Isles don’t like where he’s going to wind up they might just move quickly to get rid of Hunter or COmeau (which I think would be a mistake).
2. Rhett was probably ready last year… but there was no need to rush. They need to see Rhett for 20 games this year to help them make a better assessment of his career path.
3. Ulstrom earned an audition last year. Figren probably would have gotten one this year as well with a little more patience… but Ulstrom (from everything I’ve read) has done everything asked of him and will be at a Bergy-Figren crossroads next year. I think he will get some middle six time like Joensuu did last year. I think he has more talent than JJ, and as the team gets bigger(Nino) JJ is less attractive.
4. Martin-Haley-Hunter seems to be a nice bottom core. I agree with what you said in a previous reply that they are intruiging together, and can all slide up and down the lines individually… which make them perfect bottom six forwards.
5 ABC… ALL-YEAR Blake Comeau… If Blake avoids the trade rumors, and the mid-season 20+ game slump, he’s the third guy in three years to have a 30 goal season… even if he has a second 20+ goal season in the same role… that makes him the best third liner since NHL scoring was more like the NBA than the MLS.
6. They signed PAP for this year, If Nino, Kabanov or even Martin proves to be a top line fit, they still have PAP to back fill as a very useful forward…
So.. in conclusion… without overpaying greatly for an UPGRADE, or a legit top line RW I really see no reason to bring in another forward without getting rid of one. If you can get better value than Comeau by trading him then you are really opening yourself up for criticism… because that guy is going ot have to score 30 from the 3rd line, for under $1.5M.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Jun 20, 2011 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting

We are so fat bottomed yet could use a Joel Ward or Eddie Westfall type player. Also fat bottomed on D. Why do I get the feeling that before I sink my teeth into a fat bottomed bird this Thanksgiving that either Bailey or Comeau won’t be an Islander anymore? Hillen too. I hope not, but…

"Seriously that's the last time you guys f#@%ing won?" -RSH (about beating the Penguins in '93)

by Bryan2112 on Jun 20, 2011 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why

Do I suddenly feel like I need to follow the hype and get my skates sharpened with the flat bottom V?

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 21, 2011 2:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

6

Now PAP is an interesting one. Instinct tells me he could surprise people by doing well on a lower line…but I’m just doubtful any of the kids pushes him off that line yet.

I’m sort of operating by these made-up rules and premises:
1) Young kids can’t play defense (including Rakh…and Nino)
2) Injuries will happen and wreck best-laid plans
3) One of Martin, Haley, Hunter, Bailey or the other wildcard young forwards will take a bonus step (or in Hunter’s case just be healthy and useful like old times), but they still need someone experienced and reliable to win important faceoffs.

If Bailey would be Projected Bailey that would be huge and might scratch this itch. As it stands, I’d rather a Belanger/Goc/Ward/Handzus type come in and create good problems.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 21, 2011 2:30 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

PREMATURE PR*J*CT**NS

If Bailey would be Projected Bailey that would be huge and might scratch this itch. As it stands, I’d rather a Belanger/Goc/Ward/Handzus type come in and create good problems.
Why do I get the feeling that camp is going to be worse than last year… could it be? Well, they should play more games(full schedule) against better competition.
I agree that it would be better to havea safety net in hte forward position, but there is a good sized line this year of kids we’d like to see in support roles. So an UPPER 6 forward would be a good thing… but can they afford that?
I also agree with Bryan, that the puzzle will have a few new pieces by turkey day… and a few less familiar faces.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Jun 21, 2011 7:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Upper 6ers

I bet they could afford one, just need one who’s available (not many) and willing to come (even fewer). Probably settle for a guy in his Roloson Phase who’s still effective but scares teams away with age or injury history.

Brunette in MIN? Gagne? LaRose in CAR? Not really sexy “upper six” guys but guys who appear to still be able to contribute something. The pickings are slim.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 21, 2011 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gagne

Where do we play Gagne or Brunette? We have plenty of left wingers but a dearth of right wingers.

If anything I would replace Konopka spot with a seasoned veteran that can add some offense and have Bailey move down a line.

by TheMagus on Jun 21, 2011 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

agree totally

I can’t see anyone other than KO knocking Pap off top line…Coliton reminds me a lot of Billy Carrol. Limited offense, really good big right faceoff centre.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 21, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

my take

Luongo – on the same page with you Dom. He could still win a Cup someday, if he stops immaturely and insecurely caring what everyone thinks about him. But, when you factor in the injuries in that Finals’ series and the depth that didn’t surfaced, the better, built-for-playoff-hockey team won with the better goalie.

Belanger – sure, he or Joel Ward sound sweet. Whoever Garth can pluck from other teams to give us a competent, bottom 6, versatile forward with veteran leadership, size, grit, and/or decent talent works for me.

Brewer/Bergy – no thanks

Ullstrom – a good camp from him combined with a Ward or Belanger and suddenly our bottom 6 is pleasantly crowded. It sounds like he has a shot at Zeke’s spot along with Haley.

good ole #5 – interesting read from Pronman on what not to draft for in the top 5. Basically, focus more on upside/talent/ceiling and less on a low-risk, high-intangibles player who’s filled out early. That being said, I think if Garth gets offered a top-pairing or potential top-pairing RH D (Gudbranson) that would play for the Isles for MANY YEARS then he may deal the pick, but bottom line is that pick HAS to turn into a core impact player, either F or D, that will play here for awhile.

In regards to Garth moving the pick up or down, I agree with JP that you can’t move down
that much – you will lose the chance to draft Mika Z, Couturier, Strome. This ain’t ‘08 where the talent drops right at the Isles draft position. This draft, beyond RNH going #1 or 2, is ALL OVER THE PLACE. Larsson at 1, Huberdeau at 2, Couturier at 7…no wait Couturier at 2, Larsson at 5, Hubastank at 6…there is no consensus. So in the Isles case this year, you have 3 or 4 guys you like at #5, and when it’s your turn at the podium, you take the best of what’s left.

So, with our hopefully-last chance at drafting top 5, I’m leaning towards, in this order: Larsson, Zibanejad, Strome. All RH, all high-end skill. Larsson would = blessing. Mika Z and his all-around Trottier-like package is probably my favorite but I don’t think Garth takes him at #5. Strome is risky (size) but exudes talent and some grit as well.

Lastly, I still hope at this point EXPECT Garth to pull the wool over some Sather/Burke’s eyes and walk away from draft day with BOTH a RH D and a RH F, both of top-line upside/talent.

"Seriously that's the last time you guys f#@%ing won?" -RSH (about beating the Penguins in '93)

by Bryan2112 on Jun 20, 2011 2:10 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

rec'd for Hubastank

Now that’s a nickname!

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Jun 20, 2011 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

On moving down

I agree you can’t move down too much, but if there’s a group of four you like left at #5, I could see some sort of slide to #7 or whatever. I guess Columbus shopping #8 sort of throws a wrench in there; if they sell that to a team that really wants someone, then maybe it increases the motivation of someone else to climb above them. Either way, I agree it probably doesn’t net you much, but you never know.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

That was an excellent read on Landeskog

Taken to its logical application to the players likely to be available at #5, does this not make Dougie Hamilton a no brainer?

There's a mountain of buoyant nostalgia under this team and it's going to erupt like Vesuvius when the Islanders are back in playoff contention.... Count on it.

by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Jun 21, 2011 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd rather

…have Isles draft one of the centers than Hamilton…. I could also see Landeskog going anywhere #2-#5. I wouldn’t count that out. He’s still in the mix in the top 7 or 8 players. There seem to be significant question marks with all the top players. Will make for an interesting first 10 picks.

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Jun 21, 2011 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think what "may" see Landeskog slip...

would be his projected ceiling. he may be most NHL ready, but if a team is following the philosophy of conditioning/character/ceiling…there are several in the top 8 whose ceiling is higher than both Landeskog and Courturier.

Top 8 Prospect Ceilings:

RHN – number 1 elite playmaking centre
Larrson – number big D
Huberdeau – first line gritty left wing
Landeskog – 60-70 point, physical left wing, leader (sounds like second liner)
Courturier – 60-70 point, big physical second line centre, left wing
Hamilton – number one big, physical offensive two way right D
Strome – unbelievably talented offensive right centre/right wing, gritty, will fight
Mika Z – big, physical right centre – second line centre, can play right wing/score/playmaker – mean

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 21, 2011 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe

but Huberdeau is also interesting because he’s considered safe, in that he’s sound enough in his own end that he’ll at least be a serviceable third liner at worst, but also has a high ceiling because of his skill level and that he made such big strides this year.

And point #3 in Pronman’s article works against Hamilton. He has a huge physical advantage in both size and conditioning right now, that he won’t have in the NHL.

by afrosupreme on Jun 21, 2011 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Unless...

…he’s still growing ;-)

Seriously tho, he still needs to fill out, so another 2 inches ain’t outta the question.

"Seriously that's the last time you guys f#@%ing won?" -RSH (about beating the Penguins in '93)

by Bryan2112 on Jun 21, 2011 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

hey

If you want a short-term upgrade to your scoring, you know, there’s one right wing rumored to be available.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Jun 20, 2011 2:34 PM EDT reply actions  

PS

(Yes, I did read the article.)

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Jun 20, 2011 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Heh

Didn’t he have money problems from Fedoroving his investments? If so I can’t see how any NHL team would give him what a oil-backed KHL team would offer him.

He would fill the Kovalev role as “former Penguin now a shell of his former self” though.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

this would be a bad move…he isnt teemu. but he may still give you something.

by mdesarmo on Jun 20, 2011 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oy

He can score but what a freaking headache or distraction he would become. He needs to go to Pittsburgh where he won’t be the center of attention.

by TheMagus on Jun 20, 2011 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

perhaps

He’s still got his hands… JT could get him 40+ goals. ZOMG DO IT GARTH ! ! ! ! ONE ! TWO !

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Jun 20, 2011 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

the real reason for jagr returning to the nhl...

is wanting revenge for this…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSDjSViV1sQ

"son of a bitch i'm sick of these dolphins"

- Steve Zissou

by gukid17 on Jun 20, 2011 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gut feelings

1) My guess is that Garth stays at 5 and drafts the best forward available (Huberdeau? Couturier?). Hamilton’s intriguing, but I feel like the interest for him comes from fans interested in drafting a defenseman rather than the Isles themselves, but I fully admit I don’t know much about it from this seat. If there’s a trade to be made, and these always seem to take people by surprise, I’d prefer warm NHL bodies coming back, not more draft picks

2) I’m not feeling terribly confident about Ullstrom, but then again he’s only 21. In the little I’ve been able to watch he hasn’t terribly impressed me regarding the use of his size. We’ll see where he goes as the season moves along, but right now I wouldn’t be opposed to moving him as part of a trade package for an NHL player

3) The prodigal sons (or two of them, at least). Brewer I’d be interested, but that seems like a lot of money for not a top-pair guy. Bergenheim? I think that ship has sailed. Unless the Isles put in a heavy bid, you really think he’d want to come back? Plus I’m wary of overpaying for a guy after a big postseason, especially when we know how streaky he can be

4) Belanger is a name I’ve heard thrown out there that the Isles should go after and I’d be willing to get him. I wanted to resign Konopka, but if Garth can upgrade the position with a veteran depth player, then it’s not a terrible loss. Truthfully, though, I’d be more interested in upgrading the defense corps, if such a FA is available. Cutting down our GAs (which will hopefully be helped by more stable goaltending) seems to me like the best way to move up in the standings. Garth allegedly likes Jovanovski, though he’d be pretty expensive. I wouldn’t be opposed to throwing some money at Ian White if the Sharks can’t keep him

5) Luongo has to take some blame, especially in their losses, but there’s plenty to go around in Vancouver. The Sedins’ disappearing act, Kesler’s injuries, the loss of depth defensemen, it all seems to have caught up to the Canucks at the very end. As for Luongo’s insecurities, I mean it doesn’t sound good to the public, but there’s been plenty of elite athletes with insecurities that manage to either overcome them or win in spite of them

by Dr. Copp on Jun 20, 2011 2:39 PM EDT reply actions  

even the Green Men were off their game in the Finals

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Jun 20, 2011 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I never got while at a isles/ panthers or canucks game the fans boo and scream luongo sucks. Same goes for chara when he comes to the colliseum. Those two deals (along with losing bertuzzi)…pretty much destroyed our frachise til now. Wang had the money to sign all 3 long term. Instead we got a bunch of stiffs. 2 who don’t even play in the nhl and 1 goalie with no knees. It forever kills me to see bertuzzi, chara, and luongo fight for the cup when that should be us. dp alone will be on the payroll for a longtime and he’s a step below rendered useless.

Ill be at the draft party…anyone know if the players sign anything?

by mdesarmo on Jun 20, 2011 2:47 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

go to the isles facebook page

there is a link for a meet and greet…first 60 people to get in the line outside of doolins (where exactly is it btw) with their confirmation email get a meet and greet with like 5 of the players…and im sure they are going to sign things

wake me up when the isles start to play

by DarthDoyle on Jun 20, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

THANKS…any time you would reccomend getting there? Ill be there with my dad and he wants to schmooze with clarky haha

by mdesarmo on Jun 20, 2011 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Veteran Presence Needed

In looking at the team we absolutely need a veteran player or two to help the kids develop. I was thinking of players like Arnott or others with good character to add to the team. I am not sure if Brewer or Belanger fit the bill.

by TheMagus on Jun 20, 2011 3:17 PM EDT reply actions  

But Brewer was a POPULAR CAPTAIN!

/channels Blues management, up until the day they dumped him for a Beukeboom

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 20, 2011 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

random related comments

it wasn’t Luongo’s fault – the Canucks ran out of gas at the finish line, and the Bruins had a lot of heart & Tim Thomas was a stone wall

use the #5 pick to draft the best available forward

Ullstrom will be at Bridgeport all next year

Dibo is not to be discounted – should make an excellent 4th liner given a chance

how about this for a 4th line DiBenedetto – Bailey – Martin

and Cizikas is going to be our 3rd line center very soon

4 centers = JT, Nielsen, Cizikas, Bailey

a nice solid core

what we need is to solidify around a keeper…..Tim Thomas we don’t have – I hope Poulin is back & healthy

this may be our best D-man corp ever – Streit, Hamonic, A-Mac, DeHaan – all excellent

by Cary K on Jun 20, 2011 8:16 PM EDT reply actions  

or a 4th line of

DiBenedetto – Martin – Haley sounds good as well

by Cary K on Jun 20, 2011 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

As much as we need D....

I feel you can always bolster your D-Line through FA and the deadline. I know they blew it, but the Canucks D was practically built through FA (Hamhuis, Malhotra, Ballard). It’s hard to find those impact forwards and when they are found they usually aren’t let go for free. For me with the 5th pick, I’d go with Landeskog if hes available and then Couturier afterwards. RNH, Larsson will be gone 1-2, but if either of those two are available I’d take em. Hamilton after that, time to start drafting size.

You should've seen her face. It was the exact same look my father gave me when I told him I wanted to be a ventriloquist.

by mikefromVA on Jun 20, 2011 8:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Ballard was actually via trade (heh, Ballard!)

But he proved useless so that’s probably moot. I guess Erhoff they go through cap relief trade from SJ, too. I do think stable bluelines are easier to piece together through free agency/trade once you identify who the decent ones are.

On Landeskog: What do you make of the theory he’s just a big man who’s using his early size against peers who haven’t caught up with him yet? Stuff like that scares me a little.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 21, 2011 2:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

That paranthetical was supposed to read: (heh, for Grabner!)

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 21, 2011 2:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ive heard that too...

Guess I need to fact check before I say anything.Did know that Ballard was the grabner trade, DERR.

About Landeskog, the thing I do like about him is that he plays with piss and vinegar. I’ve watched a few of his videos and I have liked what I have seen. Guess the reason why I like him over Couturier is more the winger aspect, but to be flat out honest, I’ll be happy with whoever we get. It’s not like we’re drafting for needs at this point, should really get the best player out there.

You should've seen her face. It was the exact same look my father gave me when I told him I wanted to be a ventriloquist.

by mikefromVA on Jun 21, 2011 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

If we left the draft with landeskog or couturier, I'd be on cloud 9.

Can you imagine adding Nino and Landeskog/Couturier to the team/top 9 in 1 season? Damn. That would create some nice depth problems.

by OzzyFan on Jun 21, 2011 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are absolutely correct.

I’ll stop giving opinions for the next week. -1000

You should've seen her face. It was the exact same look my father gave me when I told him I wanted to be a ventriloquist.

by mikefromVA on Jun 21, 2011 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

And may got have mercy on your soul.

You should've seen her face. It was the exact same look my father gave me when I told him I wanted to be a ventriloquist.

by mikefromVA on Jun 21, 2011 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'll be there to cheer on the new Islander

I was going over depth charts … and it seems that the Islanders have some good young forward talent depth… but on defense, after de Haan, Donovan & Wishart wtih Katic and Ness as honorable mentions … the Isles lack a balance of defesive depth. I already consider Hamonic graduated … so I didn’t include him … or MacDonald.

I have poured over scouting reports and articles on the top 4 defense prospects in this draft … Larsson, Hamilton, Murphy and Siemens … and ALL 4 are worthy candidates … but Larsson and Hamilton both seem like the best fits. I like that Hamilton has some articles that say he may have a sharper development curve and could potentially become the best defenseman in the draft. That says a lot about the kid since Larsson has been compared to Lidstrom … but is that mostly because he’s Swedish?

I’m still trying to figure out if I’d want the Isles to take Landeskog, Couturier or Strome against Hamilton / Larsson if any of them are still on the board at #5 … although I doubt Landeskog would be. I have a hard time leaving big offensive talent on the boaord for a defeseman …. but the Isles have been stock piling prospects for 3 solid drafts before this one … and we can only have so many take up the roster spots…. resigning will be a burden if most of them are a hit … see Chicago Summer of 2010.

Gonna be a fun draft party!

by 19 Isle in NJ 22 on Jun 20, 2011 11:34 PM EDT reply actions  

DeHart

Can someone tell me what the deal is with DeHart? Why hasn’t he been part of any discussion? He is right handed defenseman who plays with attitude.

by TheMagus on Jun 21, 2011 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

his projection...

just isn’t much out there on him…is DeHart signed to BP next year? my feelings are DeHart may be a very useful 3rd pairing right D if he master’s defense at nhl level

by CanadianIsleslifer on Jun 21, 2011 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait, you guys are debating Luongo here

And I didn’t notice? ;)

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on Jun 20, 2011 11:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Of course we want your opinion ;)

Yeah, that post ringer reminds me of the close ones against Thomas early in the blowouts: It’s such a fine line between devastation and glory between two good teams (and goalies), between a 2-0 “we’re still in this” and a 3-0 “here comes the blowout.” Why, sometimes it even takes seven games to sort out.

Part of me feels really crappy that the Canucks were so hit by injuries, because I thought one of the things Gillis did well was to build that team to withstand them.

I’m so interested in Luongo’s behavior/mental side lately, I was looking forward to studying his reaction win or lose.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 21, 2011 2:38 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah

His reactions after some of the goals and behaviour between games is really out there. There’s no denying the man is a prima donna, which is frustrating to watch especially when you have Cory Schneider on the bench who is about as opposite to Luongo as you can be mentally (it seems anyways)

Luongo can be great, but I just worry with his butterfly that there’s an easy read on how to beat him. Because when the Bruins got the blowouts rolling they made it look easy to beat him.

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on Jun 21, 2011 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Butterfly or not

he just goes down way too damn early. Those over the shoulder shots he was on the ground even before the shooter looked his way. It was guessing and not reacting. Just seemed weird.

When the Isles make us drink, we curse Milbury through a monocle and with our pinkies out. Lighthouse Hockey & Chivas-All Class.
Website:Lighthouse Hockey Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Jun 21, 2011 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeup

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on Jun 21, 2011 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Butterfly or not
he just goes down way too damn early.

I think Luongo has gotten away with doing that before because of his size.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Jun 21, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

But now he plays deeper in his crease which means his size doesn’t cover up as much as before. Leaving the top a lot more open

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on Jun 21, 2011 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

also

Playing too deep in the crease makes it easier for forwards to establish position and screen you. He may stand more of a chance on some of those shots if he establishes position and can see what’s coming. It’s even more important if his glove is getting slow.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Jun 21, 2011 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

He’s actually been better on screen shots this year. It’s the ones that beat him clean that have been glaring

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on Jun 21, 2011 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

The games the Canucks won the Defense did a better job on the B's forwards

When the Vancouver D allowed the Bruins to come in with speed and take clear shots from above the circle, they exposed Luongo (either high or on the screen). When the D was in the Bruins faces at the blue line they allowed Luongo to play the traffic down low where he excels with his quickness. I’d normally play D to allow high shots, but in Luongo’s case you were probably better off forcing the play at the circle and exposing the front of the net on the rush or even across the crease.

There is a tremendous gap in skill level, but Luongo and Marty Biron play a similar style and are beaten often on the same types of plays. Shots high from further out tend to beat them, which makes it seem like it is a lack of concentration, when it is really instinctive of them to cover low and not carry the glove high enough. Luongo for as long as I remember (even when I used to watch him with Val-d’Or) has punched the puck away with his blocker and glove and not trapped it cleanly.

Luongo was right in that his style is deeper, post to post, covering low compared to Thomas who is aggresive and plays the puck not the situation. The Bruins exploited this becasue the Vancouver defense was decimated. The one area I do blame Luongo is his willingness to fight through a play. The SHG in the Final he just allowed himself to be pushed out fo the way, whereas you get the feeling Thomas would have fought tooth and nail to retain his position. Maybe not make the save either, but give the impression he wasn’t giving up.

Nassau Coliseum lost a veteran and an original Islander fan. ACC 1918-2011

by Hockey1919 on Jun 21, 2011 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ugh
The SHG in the Final he just allowed himself to be pushed out fo the way, whereas you get the feeling Thomas would have fought tooth and nail to retain his position.

Man, all of us in the cabin holed up in the woods were just ranting and raving about that. It’s Game 7, this goal is absolutely pivotal — how can you not be a freaking offensive lineman in that situation? And how can you turn immediately to the ref and act like someone’s just robbed you?

Interesting stuff on Luongo v. Biron. And agree on Luongo’s glove; I was surprised to see that when I got the chance to watch him a lot more closely this season.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Jun 22, 2011 12:51 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I think Luongo's biggest problem

is an inability to “win” games for his team. Although perhaps “inability” is not a fair term. At the top of his game, you always know that Luongo’s best chance is tobe in a position where all he has to do is not LOSE the game. Gold Medal Game — Canada was much better than the US and still we needed OT to beat Ryan Miller. I don’t think any of those 1-0 games in the SCF were on Luongo.

Tim Thomas WON the Cup. While I am not sure Luongo LOST it, he just didn’t win it.

There's a mountain of buoyant nostalgia under this team and it's going to erupt like Vesuvius when the Islanders are back in playoff contention.... Count on it.

by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Jun 21, 2011 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tough questions...

1. Stand pat, unless you get an offer you’d be a fool to turn down.
2. Tough to tell with Euros, but Ullstrom adjusted fairly well to North America on a depleted (and sometimes awful) Bridgeport team, so I say wait and see.
3a. No way in hell. Wrong side of thirty, injury history and price tag say money pit to me.
3b. I’d make a bid, but if the Bolts (or anyone else) throws an over-priced bid at him, let them have him.
4. Big, physical, power forward to play on the first line with Tavares and Moulson. (Think Dave Andrechuk or Brendan Shannahan…Steve Downie would be ideal, but the Bolts were smart enough to rob the Phlyers there and Garth missed that one. Win some, lose some.)
5. Soul sucking sad panda…choking like he was wearing a Sharks jersey under his ’Nucks jersey.

Ya ever seen Frans Nielsen’s eyes, Chief? Those…cold…black…lifeless eyes, like a dolls eyes…

by BrassBonanza10 on Jun 21, 2011 2:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Live tweeting an areener meeting:

@randimarshall

When the Isles make us drink, we curse Milbury through a monocle and with our pinkies out. Lighthouse Hockey & Chivas-All Class.
Website:Lighthouse Hockey Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Jun 21, 2011 11:07 AM EDT reply actions  

Ugh, I cannot STAND her.

She is hte kind of reporter who, when completely ignorant about something, will make-pretend that what she doesnt know doesnt matter, anyway. She is responsible for some absolute garbage in Newsday over the years re the LH project.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Jun 21, 2011 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didn't even know she existed

Until Keith retweeted her about an article saying the Arena deal was going to raise taxes 58 bucks. Of course the tweet and the headline failed to mention that it was 58 bucks annually, coming out to all of 5 bucks a month.

"I bet Calgary wishes they had a backup goalie as their GM" - Pauly C
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Jun 22, 2011 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

BUT

She is worth following because what choice do we have?

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Jun 21, 2011 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

We always have a choice

One reporter may have far more followers than any of us – but there are many more of us than there are of her. Anyone in the area can Twitter these things, not just a reporter (credentialed or otherwise).

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Jun 21, 2011 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Im sorry, I meant following in General- not as a specific Twitter thing

I follow what people like her and Staple etc have to say because there are relatively few other options for fans of this organization.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Jun 21, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

ah, got it

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Jun 21, 2011 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip and shoulder surgery not required.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Being Reasonable About Garth Snow’s First Rounders
Billy_smith_si_cover_small
LightHouse Hockey game on!
Gigantor15_small
LHH Poster's 25U25 Consensus
Jt_small
The New York Islanders and The Rebuild

Recent FanPosts

Moulsondealwithit_small
Islanders Jerseys throughout history. Which is your favorite?
Jt_small
And With the Fourth Pick, The Islanders Select...
Warlord2_small
Breaking Down the Cloutier - Salo Fight
Dutchlogo_small
LHH off-season fantasy league
890_1__small
Expectations: Strome
Small
The Angstlander -- Inside the mind of an anxious Islanders fan (that means you!)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
What else is Russian sports media telling us?

  141 votes | Results

Isles Reading

Islanders Schedule

1979-80


May 24, 1980: Tonelli to Nystrom. At long last, the steady build of the New York Islanders from expansion doormat to surprise semifinalist to annual contender reaches the promised land: Buoyed by a late season trade for Butch Goring that gave the team the depth up the middle GM Bill Torrey had been seeking, the Islanders knock off the Philadelphia Flyers in six games.

The victory justified the faith in coach Al Arbour who guided them from their second season to their first Stanley Cup seven seasons later. The Islanders would not be the first expansion team to win the Stanley Cup, but they would be the only one capable of a dynasty.

1980-81


May 21, 1981: This time it was much easier. After falling to "only" 91 points in the 1979-80 season, the Islanders returned to their division title tradition, piling up 110 points -- a whole 13 points over second-place Philadelphia.

Between the quarterfinals (where they beat the upstart Oilers in six games) and the finals, the Islanders reeled off eight consecutive wins -- with a four-game sweep of archrival Rangers in between. As they defeated the Minnesota North Stars in five games for their second Cup, their goal difference in the final was a combined +10.

1981-82


May 16, 1982: Another year, another landslide title. The Islanders won the Patrick Division by a whopping 26 points over the second-place Rangers, and were seven points clear of their nearest competition for the President's Trophy, the still-not-quite-ripe Edmonton Oilers.

A first-round scare against the Pittsburgh Penguins turned in the Isles' favor thanks to John Tonelli's heroics, and a true dynasty was on its way: Past the Rangers in six games, then an eight-game sweep of the Quebec Nordiques and Vancouver Canucks to run away with the Stanley Cup.

1982-83


May 17, 1983: Not so fast, whipper-snappers. The Edmonton Oilers' steadily rising challenge for league supremacy took them all the way to the finals for the first time, where the New York Islanders summarily dispatched them in a four-game sweep. For the Islanders, the Dynasty was secured. For the Oilers, it was a powerful lesson in where talent ends and the demands of playoff hockey begin.

Four years, four Cups, 16 consecutive playoff series wins (a record that would grow to 19 until the rematch with the Oilers the following year). Mike Bossy scored 60 goals yet again, and Wayne Gretzky became acquainted with Billy Smith's crease.


Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Warlord2_small Mark D

Lighthouse_hockey_logo_2_medium_small Keith Quinn

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Hg_small Chris McNally

Master of FIGs and Power Tablature

Icon3_small ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein

71096_479208120482_1257968_n_small David Hanssen