Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Jason Gregoire's Options, or: Know Your CBA. Your @#$% CBA.

Every time I open the CBA, I want to slap a lawyer. With the U.S. Constitution, 55 delegates were able to come up with a fairly workable system of national government in just four pages and seven articles. But the NHL CBA took most of 2005 to hammer out and runs 50 articles, 35 exhibits and 454 pages. Plus, it doesn't even have pretty penmanship.

Since Jason Gregoire is exercising a provision outlined in one of those 454 pages -- going the Blake Wheeler route and opening up the possibility to sign with any NHL team -- I figured we can open that pain-in-the-rump document to see why he can do it, and what his options (including compensation) are.

Maybe next CBA, the NHL and NHLPA will make their lawyers sit down an extra day, with a graphic designer, to draw up a flowchart for the CBA. ("Where were you born? Go here. What is your birthday? Go here. Have you played college? How long? Go here." etc.) But I doubt it.

Star-divide

Let's start from the top. Or, the middle.

Exclusive Signing Rights

What makes an unsigned player a property of his drafting team?

8.6 Reserve List-Exclusive Rights.

(a) Commencing with the 2005 Entry Draft, a Player selected by a Club in the Entry Draft shall be registered on the Reserve List of the selecting Club as an "Unsigned Draft Choice."

That's great! So we just draft a guy, and he's our until we sign him, right? Not quite. There are time limits.

Most know that teams generally have two years after the draft to sign draftees from major juniors. For college players drafted as freshmen, it's generally four years, but [emphasis mine]:

(c) College Players.

(i) If a Player drafted at age 18 or 19 is a bona fide college student at the time of his selection in the Entry Draft, or becomes a bona fide college student prior to the first June 1 following his selection in the Entry Draft, and remains a bona fide college student through the graduation of his college class, his drafting Club shall retain the exclusive right of negotiation for his services through and including the August 15 following the graduation of his college class. The Club need not make a Bona Fide Offer to such Player to retain such rights.

(ii) If a Player drafted at age 18 or 19 is a bona fide college student at the time of his selection in the Entry Draft, or becomes a bona fide college student prior to the first June 1 following his selection in the Entry Draft, and does not remain a bona fide college student through the graduation of his college class, his drafting Club shall retain exclusive rights for the negotiation of his services until the fourth June 1 following his selection in the Entry Draft. The Club need not make a Bona Fide Offer to such Player to retain such rights.

[...]

(iv) If a Player drafted at age 18 or 19, who had received a Bona Fide Offer in accordance with Section 8.6(a)(ii) above, becomes a bona fide college student prior to the second June 1 following his selection in the Entry Draft and does not remain a bona fide college student through the graduation of his college class, his drafting Club shall retain exclusive rights for the negotiation of his services until the fourth June 1 following his selection in the Entry Draft.

If you are a good boy and get your degree, your drafting team has you until Aug. 15 of that graduating summer. If you leave early, then June 1 of the fourth year following your draft becomes the big date.

But Gregoire's just completed his junior season at UND. Why does the above apply to him?

Because he was drafted in 2007. June 1, 2011 is the fourth June 1 since his draft day. When the Isles drafted him, he was playing in U.S. juniors (USHL) and continued to do so before entering college -- erm, "becoming a bona fide college student."

What about this "30 days" business?

I keep seeing reports that the Islanders have 30 days after notification to sign Gregoire. If this is true, I cannot find it in the CBA. But the important date outlined in the CBA is June 1. According to those same reports, Gregoire has formally withdrawn from UND, and thus he "does not remain a bona fide college student" and therefore this June 1 is when the Islanders no longer retain exclusive negotiating rights.

 

Gregoire's Potential Compensation

Great. So Gregoire's gone. The Maple Leafs, who buy up all the college and Euro free agents, will sign him to a $5 million deal or something. Right?

No. Just because Gregoire can shop his services on June 1 -- and I'm positive, absolutely certain, that in no way would his agent legal counsel agent family advisor have any inkling of what other NHL teams are interested -- doesn't mean he can go out and make a mint.

Well, a "mint" relative to NHL standards, anyway.

See, Gregoire is still 22 years old. That means he's still subject to the Entry Level System.

The what?

The Entry Level System. Time to return to the CBA...

Article 9: The Legislature Entry Level Compensation

(b) Subject to subsection (c) below, the period covered by the SPC for every Rookie, and the number of years that such Player will be in the Entry Level System and subject to the compensation limits set out in this Article, shall be as indicated on the chart immediately below, and during such period, the Player shall be deemed to be a "Group 1 Player":

First SPC Signing Age                  Period Covered by First SPC, Years in Entry Level System
18-21                                                        3 years
22-23                                                        2 years
24                                                             1 year
25 and older                                     No required number of years, not in the Entry Level System

When Gregoire signs a contract (SPC, or Standard Player Contract) this summer, he'll still be 22. That means he'll be in the Entry Level System for two years. So look for a two-year deal.

But I thought he was a free agent?

(d) Draft-related Unrestricted Free Agents will be subject to the maximum annual aggregate compensation limits set forth in this Section 9.3 applicable in the Entry Draft year immediately preceding the date on which the Player signs his  Entry Level SPC. For example, a Draft-related Unrestricted Free Agent Player signed after the date of the 2005 Entry Draft and prior to the 2006 Entry Draft will be subject to the maximum annual aggregate compensation for Players drafted in the 2005 Entry Draft (i.e., $850,000). Such a Player will be subject to all of the other terms and provisions of this Article 9, including without limitation, the terms of Exhibit 5 and the maximum annual Signing Bonus for a Draft-related Unrestricted Free Agent will be limited to 10% of the Player's compensation in any League Year.

What about the money?

In terms of compensation, Gregoire is just like any other rookie in the Entry Level System. If he signs in June, his maximum salary will be $900,000 at the NHL level.

Yeah, but he can demand a one-way deal, right?

No.

9.4 Minor League Compensation.

Each SPC entered into with a Rookie in the Entry Level System shall automatically be deemed to be a "two way" SPC with a minor league salary equal to the Paragraph 1 Minor League Salary set forth in such SPC or, if no minor league salary is set forth, the greater of (i) $35,000 (Native Currency) and (ii) the minimum minor league salary provided for Players in the Minors...

So he can wiggle for maximum AHL salary as set forth here ($70,000 for 2011-12), and he can wiggle for a higher NHL salary (again, $900,000 max), and he can wiggle for ELC bonuses he is unlikely to achieve, but in the end he's still treated like a draftee and his compensation will be capped on a two-way deal.

Okay. But if he signs elsewhere, the Isles get something back, right?

No. Gregoire was drafted in the third round:

8.3 Compensatory Draft Selections

In the event a Club loses its draft rights to an Unsigned Draft Choice drafted in the first round of the Entry Draft (except as a result of failing to tender a required Bona Fide Offer (as defined below)), who is again eligible for the Entry Draft or becomes an Unrestricted Free Agent, a Compensatory Draft Selection shall automatically be granted to that Club...

He was a nice prospect, so hopefully something works out with the Isles. I like depth.

If not though, hopefully this helps. Hopefully it's not too confusing. (Ha.) Hopefully it's not incorrect or subject to unpublished amendments and understandings.

But you never know with the stupid #$% CBA.

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Rec'd like my head any time I open that godforsaken doc

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on May 19, 2011 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did the Isles try to sign him prior to this year?

This situation kind of defeats the purpose of the draft. Any player that doesn’t like the team he was drafted by can just leave college right before the 4 yr window is closed and be a free agent.

The drafting team should at least have the right to offer the max and retain the player.

by TMS on May 19, 2011 1:42 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree

That is something that needs to be changed in the CBA. While I also agree with what every one was saying in the other thread…about it just being leverage for more money, what if he just rejects their final offer? He then becomes a free agent? Sure they can try to trade him before they lose his rights but to me that is a draft pick that could have been used on someone else during the draft. At least now I can kind of understand why teams try to get there college prospects out a.s.a.p. or at least the one’s that fall under this criteria.

by Shane72 on May 19, 2011 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

To a point

But one advantage teams have on college players (versus junior players and Euro players whose leagues have transfer agreements with the NHL) is that they have their rights beyond two years. So you could maybe say this is a fair out for college players — since they’re also beginning their pro careers later than junior kids.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on May 19, 2011 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Another reason?

If I’m thinking through this right (and Bossy knows that’s a big if), this also protects a college player who has been in the system long enough (i.e. four June 1s), drops out of college for whatever reason but has no place to go. If his pro team won’t sign him then he ought to be free. Obviously this creates a loophole the other way though, but you could argue that if the club is so high on a prospect, they could have coaxed him to sign in the four previous years.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on May 19, 2011 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

the June 1st thing is probably a protection for the teams as well

If you’re counting on a couple of these kids and they skip out on you, you’d like to know before the ensuing draft and free-agency period so you can address your needs properly. If August 15th applied, for example, and the kid signed elsewhere on the 16th, you’d be SOL.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on May 19, 2011 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

June 1 must’ve been with an eye toward replacing your mutinous bastards at the draft and in free agency.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on May 19, 2011 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Foundation erroding loophole

The CBA leaves severe potential for the erroding away of a re-build foundation.

I think the key here is that if the Isles make a bonafide offer … isn’t that all they need to do in order to retain his rights?

Where did the 30 Biz day / June 1st confusion come from?

With Gregoire leaving school and becoming available, why wouldn’t Snow take advantage of this opportunity to tend an ELC offer?

Can Gregoire pass on the “bona-fide” offer and become a UFA? What group FA does that make him anyway?

Thanks for peeling away some of the layers of this cluser F CBA Dom. It helped clear some of the fog … but I’m still concerned a top prospect may get away. Remember … Grabner didn’t emerge till this year… his Rookie year.

The Bridge sure could use the depth that Gregoire would provide.

Maybe Jason sees this also as the best opportunity to claim his space in the organization? Before the draft … and before more prospects leaving Junior are able to claim a roster spot. Who knows? … I guess it’s just another thing outside of our control.

by 19 Isle in NJ 22 on May 19, 2011 1:57 PM EDT reply actions  

"Bona fide offers"

Those are usually for the purposes of retaining the player’s rights up to the expiration date. (e.g. for some categories of draftees, you have to make a nominal “offer” to keep their rights to the next June 1.)

But with his rights expiring this June 1 thanks to him no longer being a college player, making another bona fide offer doesn’t do anything to extend that rights period.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on May 19, 2011 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why would anyone not sign with the team that drafted him?

I feel like that organization would be so special to you, you would try to stay with it. I hope he does sign with the Islanders and plays in Bridgeport next year. He is a nice prospect to have and he had good numbers last year

by nyidangle17 on May 19, 2011 2:52 PM EDT reply actions  

If Jason Gregoire is as good as his penchant for terrible jokes

then I want this guy on the team stat. And also mixing it up with @grabs40 and @mmoulson.

by Fabtraption on May 19, 2011 2:56 PM EDT reply actions  

I think the CBA should read more like a Choose-Your-Own-Adventure book

That would make it easier to understand Gregoire’s situation.

by Fabtraption on May 19, 2011 3:11 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

I would eat that up

They’re missing an opportunity here.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on May 19, 2011 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks, Dominik

for going through this for us. I would otherwise never, ever even bother, what with the headache risk and all.

by Paumanok on May 19, 2011 5:04 PM EDT reply actions  

It's interesting

that there isn’t something similar to the RFA situation where the club with the rights can match an offer. Would seem to prevent Lindros-type situations from happening (which I imagine is what the compensation for first-rounders is about).

by afrosupreme on May 19, 2011 5:14 PM EDT reply actions  

I've always thought about this in the following context:

If a player is of Lindros-style import, then he’s going to sign with his drafting team, because no way does he (nor his team) wait four years to get him into an NHL uniform.

But if a player is more of a questionable shot to make it at all — and if he’s entering the league at a later age as it is — he has more options.

I figure that must’ve been part of the thinking when they designed it anyway. But of course I’m not sure, because the CBA has so many left turns (and further, so many of those turns are holdovers from the previous CBA, which has never been publicly available).

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on May 20, 2011 12:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

other college players

What stops them from doing the same thing and becoming free agents? Players like Lee and Nelson? I know they need a few more years, but couldn’t most players leave, not sign then declare FA?

by Mulligan on May 19, 2011 6:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Just Lee

Of the two you mentioned only Anders Lee falls under this criteria.

by Shane72 on May 19, 2011 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not Smart to Play Chicken With Garth

Garth has demonstrated that he’s pretty fair with players in contract negotiations, but he’s also a tough negotiator. If I were Gregoire (or his agent) and I wanted to sign with the Islanders because there are openings to play and move to the NHL quickly, I wouldn’t go overboard in making demands.

And what’s this about slapping lawyers around? We slap back – usually when you’re not looking or if somebody’s holding you down. (LOL!)

by rmblifn on May 19, 2011 8:14 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

I was wondering who'd call me on that!

My brother’s a lawyer, so he’ll happily slap me back for you by proxy. (There’s probably better Latin I could use, but the hour is late!)

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on May 20, 2011 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Here's my opinion...

30 days or June 1st…

If he plays hardball?

I say sign him, then ship him to Florida with our 2nd round pick to pick #3.

by Sal Interlandi on May 19, 2011 11:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Sign-and-trade is interesting

I mean I suspect you don’t do it because then future prospects deal with you with a level of suspicion. However, you could argue it was just two parties using the leverage they had. You leveraged a higher salary, we leveraged you into something different.

Ottawa did that with Havlat (already in the NHL) once upon a time.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no hole is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on May 20, 2011 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip and shoulder surgery not required.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Being Reasonable About Garth Snow’s First Rounders
Billy_smith_si_cover_small
LightHouse Hockey game on!
Gigantor15_small
LHH Poster's 25U25 Consensus
Jt_small
The New York Islanders and The Rebuild

Recent FanPosts

Moulsondealwithit_small
Islanders Jerseys throughout history. Which is your favorite?
Jt_small
And With the Fourth Pick, The Islanders Select...
Warlord2_small
Breaking Down the Cloutier - Salo Fight
Dutchlogo_small
LHH off-season fantasy league
890_1__small
Expectations: Strome
Small
The Angstlander -- Inside the mind of an anxious Islanders fan (that means you!)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
What else is Russian sports media telling us?

  141 votes | Results

Isles Reading

Islanders Schedule

1979-80


May 24, 1980: Tonelli to Nystrom. At long last, the steady build of the New York Islanders from expansion doormat to surprise semifinalist to annual contender reaches the promised land: Buoyed by a late season trade for Butch Goring that gave the team the depth up the middle GM Bill Torrey had been seeking, the Islanders knock off the Philadelphia Flyers in six games.

The victory justified the faith in coach Al Arbour who guided them from their second season to their first Stanley Cup seven seasons later. The Islanders would not be the first expansion team to win the Stanley Cup, but they would be the only one capable of a dynasty.

1980-81


May 21, 1981: This time it was much easier. After falling to "only" 91 points in the 1979-80 season, the Islanders returned to their division title tradition, piling up 110 points -- a whole 13 points over second-place Philadelphia.

Between the quarterfinals (where they beat the upstart Oilers in six games) and the finals, the Islanders reeled off eight consecutive wins -- with a four-game sweep of archrival Rangers in between. As they defeated the Minnesota North Stars in five games for their second Cup, their goal difference in the final was a combined +10.

1981-82


May 16, 1982: Another year, another landslide title. The Islanders won the Patrick Division by a whopping 26 points over the second-place Rangers, and were seven points clear of their nearest competition for the President's Trophy, the still-not-quite-ripe Edmonton Oilers.

A first-round scare against the Pittsburgh Penguins turned in the Isles' favor thanks to John Tonelli's heroics, and a true dynasty was on its way: Past the Rangers in six games, then an eight-game sweep of the Quebec Nordiques and Vancouver Canucks to run away with the Stanley Cup.

1982-83


May 17, 1983: Not so fast, whipper-snappers. The Edmonton Oilers' steadily rising challenge for league supremacy took them all the way to the finals for the first time, where the New York Islanders summarily dispatched them in a four-game sweep. For the Islanders, the Dynasty was secured. For the Oilers, it was a powerful lesson in where talent ends and the demands of playoff hockey begin.

Four years, four Cups, 16 consecutive playoff series wins (a record that would grow to 19 until the rematch with the Oilers the following year). Mike Bossy scored 60 goals yet again, and Wayne Gretzky became acquainted with Billy Smith's crease.


Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Warlord2_small Mark D

Lighthouse_hockey_logo_2_medium_small Keith Quinn

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Hg_small Chris McNally

Master of FIGs and Power Tablature

Icon3_small ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein

71096_479208120482_1257968_n_small David Hanssen