If you smeeeellelelelelel...what the Rakh...is cookin'
There has been some prospect debate over the last several days. Notably about the play of Bridgeport Sound Tiger 23 year old rookie right wing Rhett Rakhshani. Several have been unimpressed with his numbers given his age and argue that his prospect status is slim because of those numbers and that he should be "dominant" at the AHL level given his age and experience.
Due to the fact that stats are not kept with the same vigor in the AHL as they are in the NHL, I will attempt to provide some context for Rakhshani's play throughout the season. I will not attempt to address his "prospects" of an NHL career, or project about the type of career he will have. I am not sure that he will make it to the NHL, his impact there or if he can even replicate what he has done at Bridgeport this year. I believe there should be some defense of a fine season however and want to show the impact he had given the circumstances of the Sound Tigers this year who rivaled only their parent club in terms of fill-ins, call-ups and injuries.
First let's start with Rahkshani being "old" for a rookie. Yes, he did turn 23 in March, but any kid that elects to finish college will have the same problem of "being old" when they crack a professional lineup. It is notable that he was a captain of his team at Denver University for his junior and senior seasons and put up excellent numbers in is collegiate career (156gp 60g 91a 151pts). He was an All-American in 2010 following other great Pioneers like Paul Stastny (2006), Matt Carle (2005,2006), Brett Skinner (2005), and Wade Dubielewicz?!?! (2002). This is not a soft program by any means.
Next, is the issue of "dominance" at the AHL level. Of the top 20 AHL scorers this season, only the two tied for 18th with 62 points were rookies. One was Rakhshani, the other was Luke Adam of the Portland Pirates. Adam played on the same team as (I am avoiding "with", because I can not tell linemates in the AHL) Mark Mancari who is 15th on the leader board with 64pts in 56gp. It should be noted however, that Adam caught fire after Mancari was called up to the Sabres on March 1st. Portland on the season, had 103 points to Bridgeport's 71, scored 280 goals to BPT's 218, and had a goal differential of +42 to BPT's -48. A total differential of 90.
It doesn't appear that anyone was "dominant". Of the top 20, only 9 players averaged a point per game pace or better. The league leader (Corey Locke) had 21g 65a 86pts in 69gp, and the next closest had 78pts in 70gp. Of those 20, it appears that only Mancari was not on an AHL roster at the end of the season due to the call up by the Sabres. He had 1g 7a 8pts -1 12PIMs and was shot 2.3% in 20gp.
Let's examine the rest of the leaderboard.
For starters, there are notable AHL lifers like; Jason Krog, Keith Aucoin, Ben Walter (remember him?) and Alexandre Giroux...which leads to this;
- Mean age of top 20 scorers (28) No, I'm not playing around with decimal points!
- Mean GP 66
- Mean Points 69
- The mean age of Rhett Rakhshani (23) is 5 years younger than the field. There are only three players younger than Rakhshani among the leaders. Luke Adam (20), Zach Boychuck (21), and Chris Terry (22). Terry and Boychuck both have a year of AHL under their belt, are teammates on the Charlotte Checkers and Terry (80) has 14 more GP than Rhett (66); Boychuck (60) and Adam (57) have less.
- Of the 20 leading scorers, many were teammates. There were two teams with three players on the list (Hershey Bears and Charlotte Checkers) and three teams with two players (Chicago Wolves, Portland Pirates, Oklahoma City Barons) These teams accounted for 12 of the top 20 scorers. Only 40% of the league's 30 teams had a scorer in the top 20.
- The mean season points for the five above teams is 96 with a low of 89.
- The mean goals scored for the above teams is 261 with a low of 245.
- Of the remaining seven teams with a player in the top 20 of scoring (not including Bridgeport):
- Their mean season points were 91 with a low of 82.
- Their mean season goals scored were 234 with a low of 216
Bridgeport finished with 71 points (30 wins) and 218 goals scored. They were below the lowest point totals of both above groups 18 and 11 points respectively in season points, and were significantly below the averages for goals scored throughout the season. What went wrong for the Tigers this season and why is Rhett's 62 points in 66 games rather remarkable? What else is their to notice besides that time he caught fire when Josh Bailey was sent down?
Rhett started slow and that is understandable given the transition to the pro game. He had 15 points through his first 23 games (There are no official stats for time on ice that I can find for the AHL. Additionally, I'm not sure if he was seeing regular PP time.) I will generally give a kid 20 games to adjust no? From the start of the season however, there were injuries to the Islanders (no, get out...no seriously) and adjustments throughout the organization. Forgive the ordering because there is overlap to many of these transactions.
- Hilbert never plays for team.
- Colliton didn't arrive until 10/22, as a probable replacement for Matt Martin, who was called up 10/23.
- DiBenedetto is out with injury for most of November.
- Hisey is out from 11/7-12/11
- Joensuu called up from 11/6-12/12 and is back and forth to Long Island finally and finally leaves for good on 3/13
- Jon Sim arrives and between 11/3-11/24, Rahkshani puts up 9 points in 8 games.
- Katic goes out with injury on 11/20-12/03 leaves for good 3/28 to finish out the year with the big club.
- Hamonic is called up permanently 11/21
- The goaltending triad Bridgeport version ruins two; Lawson and Koskinnen stink like a skunk that crawled inside of another skunk's ass and died. Lawson is terrible until the beginning of December, Koskinnen until mid-March.
Josh Bailey was demoted to Bridgeport to "build confidence" and "work his game out" from 11/24-12/19 for a total of 11 games. This was done at the last possible moment before he exceeded a "games played" provision in the collective bargaining agreement that would require him to pass through waivers prior to a demotion. During the Bailey period, Rakhshani was:11gp 5g 12a 17pts +1. (Coincidentally, so was Bailey with 6g 11a 17pts +5).
After Bailey leaves, Rhett has a mini-slump of 3 points in his next 9 games between 12/26-1/9 so yeah, 9 games in 14 days. By 1/9, he has played 39 games. His max is 41 in college...in a full season. In 15 November games, he had 12 points. Let's consider some other occurances or yet-to-occur-ances) during that time period...
Next, more lists;
- Bridgeport’s only reliable goaltender Kevin Poulin leaves 12/31, as Dwayne Roloson is traded. He plays well on Long Island, is sent to Bridgeport for one game Jan 28th over the all-star break, promptly contracts DiPietro knee upon his return, out for season.
- On or about 1/9, Rhett gets called up to the Isles, suffers a concussion, and plays in only 9 games between 1/9-2/27
- Lawson who begins to play well, plays 1 game for BPT between 12/30 and 3/18 due to a call up to be in the DiPietro, 'my knee hurts, I can't be pulled or inserted goaltending triage and triad follies'. Lawson plays terribly for the Islanders leading to the Islanders acquisition of Al Montoya. Lawson plays only 5 games for Bridgeport between 1/18 through the end of the season. Getting hurt which leads to the promotion of Joel Martin from the Odessa Jackalopes. (Anyone else picturing a blind antelope right now?) PS, also terrible, is Martin.
As a side note, some may not remember the idea that teams tend to play a more defensive style of game when they have a lead. With the goaltending in complete disarray due to call-ups injuries and terrible play, Bridgeport goes on an epic run of Sheen-like proportions from 1/02-3/20 in which they went 5-22-9. More listed reasons;
- Leading goal scorer (12) Haley is called up 2/5, never returns.
- DiBenedetto is with the Islanders from 2/27-3/16
- Between 1/1-3/5, Colliton plays only 3 games for Bridgeport due to an Islander call-up.
- Joensuu is in and out of the lineup playin 11 games between 1/1-3/5 leaving for good on 3/13.
- Power play quaterback Dylan Reese (alright, alright....get yourself together) plays 9 games between 1/1-3/18.
- Ty Wishart arrives 1/5, leaves for good 3/16...there is a call-up or two in between.
For the season, Bridgeport dresses 60 different players. They are awful. The Columbus Dispatch would have a field day. So what happens in that time period?
Rhett Rakhshani happens...to the tune of 17pts in 14 March games and follows with 7pts in 4 April games as reinforcements arrive from the college ranks for ATOs.
Rhett's final stat line 66gp 24g 38a 62pts -11 32PIM 3GW.
All of that on a team that had a -48 goal differential and only scored 218 goals (2.725 per game). It would be difficult to retrace the scoring while Rahkshani was injured or otherwise out of the lineup, so subtracting 2.725 X 14 missed games=218-38=180.
This means that Rhett figured in 34.4% of the Sound Tigers scoring this season. More than 1/3 of all goals ran through Rhett. His 3 GWG are 10% of BPT’s paltry total. He broke BPT’s rookie scoring record formerly held by Colliton by 9 points (53/62 both in 66 games), had two separate 7 game scoring streaks, had a 6 game multi-point scoring streak, He was named to the AHL all-rookie team, named an AHL all-star and had a line of 1g 3a 4pts +4 in that game.
Now, I'm no fool, I don't expect a miracle that Rhett Rakhshani is some kind of Martin St. Louis lying in wait for his opportunity, but similarly, I can't believe for a second that Bailey is the only party to the success Rakhshani had this year...especially when the stats prove otherwise. He was less effective without Bailey, but really, at times he was playing with little if any help. As a side note, Bailey stunk without Rhett too.
He put up proportionally BETTER numbers than Tavares in the same situation of playing with crappy goaltending and poor defense...except, Tavares' linemates didn't change all year... so he played a full season with quality forwards.
He played huge stretches of the year while 3-4 centers were out of the lineup at any given time. (Haley, DiBo, Hisey, Colliton). He survived a coaching change and system philosophy change as well. Remember that time when Capuano was named interim coach? His coach at Bridgeport for the second half, Pat Bingham, wasn't brought back this year...perhaps there were some system troubles there too.
So let's call it a day on not being "dominant" in the AHL. He played on a terrible team, with little if any help, was injured more than once, including his concussion. He survived a coaching change, played 25 more games than he is used to playing, made Bailey look good, was an all-star and all rookie, and was in the top 20 in scoring with mostly older players in front of him. He broke team records, got in a couple of games for the big club, and to me was pretty damn good considering that no rookie year anywhere should look like what he had to deal with.
As I wrote this, I became ten times more impressed by the perseverance, dedication and leadership and skill demonstrated by Rhett this year. Let's hope this kid makes it. He deserves it.
28 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great write up...
I really do hope this kid has a bright future. He has to overcome plenty of players to make that crucial 9th forward spot on the team next season. (Barring any injuries)
With the emergence of Nino, playing even better than last season at Juniors… Rhett’s in a probable odd-man out situation at the NHL level. He’s a great player to have waiting in the wings.
I don’t want to downplay any of the things he did on a team that had a revolving door at Bridgeport. It must’ve been a HUGE challenge for him.
At best he might crack the lineup in case there’s an Injury next season.
This is just my opinion. Yes, we need to take a look at what he can do at the NHL level.
His seems to be playing 2nd fiddle to El Nino & Jesse Joensuu, because of size. Unfortunately, I’m in agreement with that. Our Islanders lack the size to play with teams like Philly. This is his only downside. Like the lottery… Hey, you never know.
Again, great article.
I don't forsee stardom for the Rakh
He doesn’t seem to be overly skilled to be a Top 6 forward and he doesn’t seem to have the size to be a bruiser in the Bottom 6. I feel like his best shot to have a nice NHL season would to become a 3rd line, penalty killing winger, which after next season the ISlanders could be looking for when Hunter and P.A.’s contracts expire.
He reminds me a lot of Marty McInnis. He had a decent NHL career so who knows.
Intently glued to every COZO
Kind-a agree
Third line winger sounds abour right. Comeau scores 25 goals as a 3rd line winger with Bailey. I’ll take it.
NOWHERE Nearly enough defensemen to last through the injury bug
Rhett
Overall, I’d say that Rhett had a successful first pro season. I would’ve liked to have seen a bit more of Rhett during his callup to the Isles, but unfortunately, the concussion he sustained limited that.
That being said, I’m expecting more of the same next season, and hopefully Rahkshani can impress if he is called up to the Isles again at some point.
This is a trul impressive bit of work.
Well done, KQ.
For me, I’m pleased to see that there is more upside to the Rahk than would otherwise appear. I have to admit to having a a bit of a bias against college players since so few of them make large impacts in the NHL, as compared with Major Junior players. Someone who sticks to a four year program and comes out as Rhett has deserves a significant shot and hers’s hoping he makes good on it.
There's a mountain of buoyant nostalgia under this team and it's going to erupt like Vesuvius when the Islanders are back in playoff contention.... Count on it.
by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Apr 16, 2011 7:16 PM EDT reply actions
nice job
so the answer is 17 of Rakh’s points came when Bailey was down
leaving 45 points the rest of the year against vastly inferior opposition – that simply isn’t that good
and he doesn’t play much D
and you probably didn’t see him play – he visibly doesn’t have NHL tools – any reference to Tavares is silly
DiBenedetto had a better year at Bridgeport and remains a better prospect,
hence he spent more time up with the big club
I don’t see where Rakh fits with the Islanders as the real prospects like Nino & Kabanov mature and get added to what we have already
Alrighty then
You mean the same DiBenedetto who at 5 months younger than Rhett has18 less points in two season (118gp and 44 pts -12 107PIMs) and was called up and played mostly Gillies’ 4th line role during his 10 game suspension? Rakhshani was called up way before DiBenedetto, but was hurt almost immediately. Chances are, the team didn’t call up Rakhshani because the only minutes available were 4th line minutes (6-10 a night) and they wanted him playing more than that…or that Rhett was not the abrasive type they needed at the time. 45 points in the remaining 55 games is not bad especially considering his injury, lack of consistent teammates, and the fact that he was adjusting to a new league, coach and system throughout the year…If you can find me anyone else in the AHL that played under similar conditions and performed as well, I’d be glad to hear it.
I didn’t see them play…but these data tell a pretty significant story. I won’t dispute that DiBo may make the NHL before and have a better career than Rhett because they are different types of players…but to deny that he had a good season is off-base. The Tavares reference was not meant as a player comparison…the numbers were the comparison. I don’t expect RR to be remotely the player that JT is. The point was the numbers. If you can consider JT’s season a success in terms of numbers, Rhett’s were similarly/proportionally good (actually better) at Bridgeport.
"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com Twitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Apr 17, 2011 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Nice problem to have
Here we have a player putting up good numbers and showing promise and we have hard hard time figuring out where he fits in the lineup.
Whether He's Dominant or Not in AHL Won't Necessarily Determine NHL Status
I only saw Rakh play when he was with the Isles – so basically I barely saw him and have no opinion of his play or how good a prospect he is.
The only comment I have is that whether or not a player is “dominant” in the AHL often has no bearing on whether the player will have success in the NHL. There are plenty of “4A” type players who put up very impressive numbers in the “A” and can’t stick in the NHL. And there are even a few players who do very little in the “A” for whatever reason and because of their talent become bona fide contributing NHL players. What ultimately matters are the player’s skills and how his game translates to the NHL level.
I hope Rakh makes it, and I’m at least confident that under current Isles management that they’ll (1) give him the opportunity; and (2) put him in the best position to succeeed. That’s all a guy can ask for.
Exactly
"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com Twitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Apr 17, 2011 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions
He's still a kid
No reason to think he can’t become something for NYI…notice “games missed” or “hip pointer” mentioned nowhere in this post until now? Joy!
A JP quote (about the number of long-distance fans gathering here)
It just made me laugh, and it was time for a refresh.
Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.
The sad reality...
The emergence of the Islanders 2nd half success was due to continuity and growth. We can all agree on that, no matter which player we’re talking about.
Going in to next season, and hoping they sign Grabs, KO, Bailey, Comeau, Haley & Konopka… How many spots are we talking about? Remember Hunter is on the team…
It leaves only one spot. (Barring injuries)
It comes down to the third line. Comeau/Bailey/ _________
Nino, JJ, maybe our #5 pick, Haley and Rhett.
In Rhett’s case he’s going to have to really go above and beyond expectations in order to crack the lineup. Nino is the favorite, with Hunter on the 4th line. That would mean Haley, JJ and Rhett go to Bridgeport.
That’s Rhett’s sad reality.
by Sal Interlandi on Apr 17, 2011 10:58 AM EDT reply actions
I've posted this before...
Where I see the depth chart going into camp:
Moulson-Tavares-Parentau
Grabner-Nielsen-Okposo
Comeau-Bailey-Nino
Martin-Haley-Hunter
I think Rhett is the first option next year for any of the RW spots…most likely Hunter’s. Ullstrom may be the first choice should we lose a top 2 center, Colliton if it’s the bottom two.
I also think that next year might bring a tool that Gordon never really had… THE HEALTHY SCRATCH. Sure, he had Tambellini, but we never really knew whether Tambs was the threat, or the theatened until he was ousted. I think Rhett, JJ, Ulstrom will give Jack some bullets in the belt should anybody misfire. It might even be deeper than that should some of the “fence” prospects get ELC’s to join BPT.
Any way you slice it the organization is deeper than it’s been in over a decade.
Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA
Great research
I’m a fan that thinks that size is a factor. Yes the Habs have several smaller players and the team has done well. But look at their D and the rest of the big forwards who are there to back-up these guys and keep the opposition honest. Our projected D for next season is one of the smallest in the league. On the other hand the New York Times in todays editions has an article highlighting the success of smaller players. And finally we have had our bad luck with former AHL stars Tamby and RHS. Rhett in his short “cup of coffee” stay on the Island showed a lot more heart than the two losers I just mentioned. and that quality is a must for all players big or small!
Mars needs women; Islanders need quality forwards
Great recap! So much chaos for Bridgeport this year, it’s pretty fun to go back through it and see just how much they dealt with.
People ripping Rakh’s production this year…I’m not sure what they’re hoping for, assessing or expecting. The kid is not supposed to be an NHL start and won’t be. (And I don’t think his advocates are even suggesting that.)
To me the question is can he be one of 12 quality forwards for an NHL team. And by 12 quality forwards I don’t mean “either you score a lot on the top six or you hit and beat people up” — I mean when you’re on the ice, are you a net gain or a net loss? Can you do something (i.e. fill in with skilled players when needed, or play PK, or keep an opposing line in check, etc.) Disregarding size (which he’ll always deal with), for that question his first AHL season was a positive sign.
Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.
Dom
I think I agree with you………but I’m alittle confused by your term[" NHL start"] Do you mean starter? and if so what do you mean by that? I Believe the kid deserves a real good look in camp and then if that is positive the role you mentioned in your last paragraph. I think he has guts and potential – does that add up to a career? we will see. Another possibility is to gamble with his future and let another team take him in a package that might include other prospects or better yet a player we could use now – ie a Big D or Big forward or even a Goalie.
I'm thinking he meant
NHL star, not “start”. That I agree with. He was projected to be a player of some kind. No one expects him to be putting up 80 pts in the NHL level…maybe 30-40 with a specialized skill set like PK. That is a quality NHL player though for a 4th rounder.
"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com Twitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Apr 18, 2011 10:26 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Yes, "start" should have been "star"
I think in the interests of simplicity we throw around “top six” and such terms loosely, and it gets us into trouble or at least pigeon-holing when discussing prospects. So in that sense we get these equations that go like: if Rakh won’t be a big-time scorer —> he must be a checker —> he’s not big enough to be a checker —> he has no future.
While in reality I think it’s much more nuanced than that. Each better level of hockey culls out the weaker “I’m a scorer” guys from the level below — unless they adapt to new roles in the NHL. (It’s funny even the number of goons in NHL history who were decent scorers at lower levels. A lot of them never wanted to be enforcers, but they did it out of job security.)
I wouldn’t bet on any single player like Rakh, but I like what he’s done so far — just like I see/read signs in Ullstrom that he’s adapting to what’s needed to attain an NHL job. Remember the Frans. Some guys figure it out and put their smarts to work.
Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.
That's basically
what I’ve been trying to argue on a couple fanposts. The Islanders don’t have boatloads of talent. They don’t have boatloads of size. But one way they could gain an edge is to roll out four productive lines. To me, this means dismantling/recasting last year’s fourth line. And as fans it means stop thinking about them as scoring/checking/two way lines. It’s not a video game.
"It's not a video game"
I have the urge to repeat that in so many situations.
Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.
Konopka
is one of the goons who was a pretty decent scorer in the AHL
if we could get him to stop fighting so much and learn to skate a little better he could have some slight upside
"Mario Lemiuex… I used to respect you."- Turgeon1992
Konopka's interesting
Because he really is rarely used in offensive situations. I mean, to get as many faceoffs as he does, in the defensive zone (mostly), with the wingers he has, and still only log 10 minutes a game (granted, time in the box must be a factor in that), that’s…well no wonder he has no offense to speak of. I don’t know what situations garnered his offense in the AHL, but I don’t blame him for thinking he could actually produce a bit more if given half a chance.
Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.
Stats for his last AHL season were
GP G A PTS PIM
70 17 40 57 186
not bad, maybe because of his linemates he hasnt gotten a chance to show much offense.
Gillies was on that line for most of the season, and when haley replaced him, maybe it was just me but it seemed like they had several dominant shifts in the offensive zone every game (that being said, they rarely ever actually scored, but hey beggars cant be choosers)
"Mario Lemiuex… I used to respect you."- Turgeon1992
Excellent write-up Keith...
I am fan of what Rhett has done, and HOW he has done it. I know I couldn’t have put together such a compelling argument for this past season, but I’m sure glad you have.
My points in previous posts were not to belittle the accomplishments or potential of other Islander prospects, or to say that Rhett has surpassed them (one in particular) in terms of age/accomplishments, just that Rhett has done a world of good things without ever allowing us to question his will or desire.
I don’t wish injury or poor play on anybody, but I feel that Rhett has earned another call up/audition should they be in need of a RW.
Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA
I think you're absolutely right
And I knew you weren’t suggesting he’s more of a prospect than anyone…just recognizing the work. Let’s face it, this kid has never really had anything (talent) come really easy for him, he’s broken hump to get better.
I just wanted to take it a step further because he was literally, “The Rakh” for Bridgeport this season. Any time he played with a set of quality linemates, he exploded. He’s not a game changer on his own (yet/possibly never) but he certainly was a nice piece to a puzzle.
He had a nice positive effect on Colliton also. When they were together, his points were sick. I’ll bet I we tracked it (which I assure you was a huge pain in the ass), he had a positive impact on the scoring of all of his linemates as well. He certainly doesn’t deserve to be minimized any more than Tavares for not puttin up 80 Nielsen for bit winning the Selke, or Grabner for not winning the Calder. As a matter of fact, he was our only organizational all-star (not counting Jrs).
"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com Twitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Apr 18, 2011 10:35 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Love the title.
In Lou We Trust/Twitter/Cycle Like the Sedins
Then I guess the animals are on their own. Even the cute ones.
by Kevin Sellathamby on Apr 18, 2011 10:19 AM EDT reply actions

by 











































