Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Roy Nelson Willing to Pay for His Next Opponent's Drug Test

Islanders 50 Contract Limit and Next Season

So that's how Z keeps winning all those faceoffs...

With the dust from the trade deadline settling, it's as good of a time as ever to look at the Islanders roster for next season. The CBA mandates a 50-contract limit which covers all players signed to the Islanders (including guys on two-way deals in Bridgeport), with an exception: Age 18 and age 19 players who were returned to Juniors, and who have not played 11 NHL Games in one season, shall be exempt from inclusion in the 50-player limit. This means that currently Nino Niederreiter and Calvin De Haan do not count towards the limit. Teams generally operate below that limit, in part to leave room for injury emergencies.

Currently Signed and Counting Against Limit

John Tavares
Matt Moulson
Trent Hunter
Matt Martin
P.A. Parenteau
Frans Nielsen
Justin DiBenedetto
Mark Streit
Mark Eaton
Milan Jurcina
Travis Hamonic
Mark Katic
Mike Mottau
Andrew MacDonald
Rick DiPietro
Kevin Poulin
Mikko Koskinen
David Ullstrom
Rhett Rakhshani
Anton Klementyev
Tony Romano

 

That's 21 players already signed for next season. After the jump we break down the rest of the roster.

Star-divide

Currently Signed and Will Be RFAs

Josh Bailey
Kyle Okposo
Michael Grabner
Blake Comeau
Michael Haley
Ty Wishart
Bruno Gervais
Jack Hillen
Al Montoya
Jesse Joensuu
Robin Figren
Tomas Marcinko
Dustin Kohn
Dylan Reese
Rob Hisey
Jeremy Colliton

 

That's 16 RFAs. If all of them are brought back that would put them at 37 for next year.

Currently Signed and Will Be UFAs

Doug Weight
Zenon Konopka
Trevor Gillies
Radek Martinek
Nathan Lawson
Andy Hilbert
Evgeni Nabokov
Joel Martin
Jeremy Yablonski

 

That's 9 UFAs. If all RFAs and UFAs are brought back that would put the Islanders at 46 contracts, possibly 48 if both Nino and Calvin leave juniors. Obviously this isn't likely as some of the UFAs aren't coming back (Weight, Martin, Nabokov) and some of the RFAs are more then likely gone (Figren, Reese).

The Islanders also have to make decisions on the following players:

Prospects

Player Decision
Tony Dehart Already playing overage year in OHL
Anders Nilsson Will lose rights if not signed
David Toews Already playing overage year in WHL
Brian Day Graduating college
Shane Sims Graduating college
Casey Cizikas Could still play overage year

 

That would be another 6 players signed, meaning if all free agents are retained and all prospects signed the Islanders would be at 52 contracts, possibly 54. Going with 54, we can expect that neither Weight or Nabokov will be back next year. At the same time Lawson and Martin can both be considered gone if Nilsson is signed. That would put the Islanders at 50 contracts for next year with De Haan and Nino not returning to juniors.

Obviously the Islanders won't go into the season at the limit, in case somehow injuries cause them to use seven different goalies. There's also the possibility that they will add a free agent or two during the offseason and that they might need to sign their first-round selection to an NHL deal.

What are your thoughts on who stays and who goes?

Comment 169 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thoughts about goalies (other than those with the initials RDP.....)

…..in my opinion, we can safely say now the goaltending core is DiPietro, Poulin and Montoya (although injuries to the first two could still ultimately remove them from the equation, as we ALL know) with Koskinen and Nilsson slated for Bridgeport – one concern: both coming from Europe / Scandinavia, are their styles too similar? Both are big boys as I recollect, although Mikko towers over most EVERYbody on the team and given his efficiency-of-motion issues, it has to be asked if Anders wrestles with the same depth perception-related problems as Koskinen…..Lawson and Martin are indeed gone, although I’m not 100 percent convinced Nathan still might not go on to figure out the flaws in his game (Job 1: LIMIT REBOUNDS) and become a decent backup elsewhere….

by ogam5 on Mar 4, 2011 6:45 AM EST reply actions  

- also, regarding certain defensemen with culinary skills,

…..I feel strongly that Bruno HAS earned his way back onto the roster in the last 2 months; the hope is that with Streit back and functioning at close to peak efficiency, ALL the defensemen will see their +/- and Corsi figures improve Markedly (LOL) as well as have a bit more freedom to indulge their offensive tendencies (AMac, Travis, Jurcina, Wishart and, yes, Gervais) as applicable….

by ogam5 on Mar 4, 2011 6:49 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Interestingly, while Z is the sentimental favorite to be retained,

it’s possible not ONE of the UFAs may be here come September – Radek will remain a big question mark until then as well – as for those signed, I think if Nino does come up, Hunter is gone early on for sure – if not sooner, as is likely – and Mottau goes if DeHaan does stay with the big club (which I’m not optimistic will happen….) but any number of players could easily push him off the Island, especially Donovan if he signs early. Eaton remains a depth resource like Bruno but could be an attractive piece to a trade too; of the 2, as unpopular a stance it may be, I say keep Gervais for what I suspect are some decent offensive contributions in the right mix with Streit, as I’ve said….

by ogam5 on Mar 4, 2011 7:00 AM EST reply actions  

I dont know about the roster

but I’m sure Konopka lost that faceoff

"It don't make you a bad person" - Ron Bennington

by Pauly C on Mar 4, 2011 7:30 AM EST reply actions  

Andy Hilbert? lolz

If he’s an Islander then where the hells has he been?

by KO21 on Mar 4, 2011 7:41 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

I'd say Gilles is gone

We know Wang isn’t a big supporter of the violent part of the game and he’s certainly not a fan of the bad press so I think he’s gone. It’s just a matter of if he is replaced by another heavyweight or they just go with what they got. If any of the UFA’s are back I’d say Martinek but at his age and fragility I’d say there’s a good chance he is not back. Weight’s gonna be an assistant coach. Maybe we sign Lawson and keep another 3 headed beast in BPT just because of the injury history but I’d call that 50/50 at this point.

You mean to tell me shooting the puck from 70 feet out doesn't earn us extra goals?

by Anarcurt on Mar 4, 2011 8:13 AM EST reply actions  

But if Nilsson is over then he's likely gone

You mean to tell me shooting the puck from 70 feet out doesn't earn us extra goals?

by Anarcurt on Mar 4, 2011 8:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry forgot about Konopka

He’s very likely back otherwise they wouldn’t have asked for a 2nd pick.

You mean to tell me shooting the puck from 70 feet out doesn't earn us extra goals?

by Anarcurt on Mar 4, 2011 9:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Id like a pole on who wants Gillies back and who doeasnt

Id vote to keep him….Hes got heart and rarely, if ever, loses a fight…If he can learn to play on the edge without crossing that line, he would fill his role perfectly…If he is gone then Martin and Zenon can enforce and protect the teams stars and they can actually play hockey, especially MM…MM’s been showing hes got potential to be more than a checking liner….

by KO21 on Mar 4, 2011 1:25 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Lots of room....

for AHL UFA.
I would think of all the UFA only Konopka will be back. I would like to see him resigned just before the last game against Pittsburgh.

Of the College Grads and such..Sim and Day are gone. The interesting question is Cizikas. I’m not sure if he’s elligible for the AHL next season.

DeHart should be part of the Sound Tigers defense with Wishart, deHaan, Katic, Klementyev and Kohn.
Of the unsigned RFA; Time to say goodbye to Bruno, Reese, Marcinko,Frigen, maybe more.

The tough choices will be regarding the goaltending. They can’t go into next season with Poulin and DP and should sign a UFA vet Goalie (Bring back Roloson!!). Poulin needs to be back in the AHL. Regardless of how well Montoya plays, I think he’s gone and Koskineen and Nilsson start the season sharing time in Bridgeport with Poulin. Three goalies in Bridgeport is not the best situation, but we know DP will get hurt.

by John from ATL on Mar 4, 2011 8:35 AM EST reply actions  

Cizikas is eligible

But can return to his junior team for an overage season. Figren may leave on his own, and I strongly disagree on Montoya. That kid was a standout firs round draft pick and has had more success at the NHL level than at the AHL level. Once he worked with Sudsie, he’s been great! He has a sub 2 GAA and a .930+sv%. Its a small sample, but unless we get significant compensation or him. I say keep him. If he keeps playing like this, he’s our #1 vet on the cheap.

The problem will again be the DP unanswered questions goaltender clog. This will only be a problem when 2 or more young guys are outplaying DP at the NHL level…which is pretty foreseeable.

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 8:54 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I think that, if Nilsson isn't retained, KP and Monty can alternate as backup (starter?)

and possibly split time in Bridgeport, depending of course mostly upon DP’s mercurial constitution…..presto; no goalie logjam

by ogam5 on Mar 4, 2011 9:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

But I see no chance of them not signing Nilsson and wasting a pick like that…especially in light of that constitution…next year will be more of the same. Only with Al playing the role of Dwayne. They will probably do the BPT rotation with Poulin (Bouncing back and forth) to make sure 5 goalies get 4 goalies worth of starts.

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 9:31 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Not sure where Montoya will be on the Waiver clock

At his age I’m thinking he would have to pass waivers next season if he’s to be sent down.

You mean to tell me shooting the puck from 70 feet out doesn't earn us extra goals?

by Anarcurt on Mar 4, 2011 9:50 AM EST up reply actions  

OK I looked it up he's definitely waiver eligible next year

So if we sign him he’d have to go through waivers to go to BPT.

You mean to tell me shooting the puck from 70 feet out doesn't earn us extra goals?

by Anarcurt on Mar 4, 2011 10:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Montoya is probably going to start next season in the NHL

we don’t know the time table on Poulin, and the Isles could always send Nilsson down to the ECHL worst case. But I suspect they’ll go with a 3 headed goalie at Bridgeport again.

"Wonder where Botta will go from here?" "to work for the Ministry of Truth?" ~ Original Rob
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Mar 4, 2011 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

The UFAs are pretty easy to weed out.

Doug Weight – Gone
Zenon Konopka – Trend says keep (I think he comes back cheap)
Trevor Gillies – Gone
Radek Martinek – Trend says go (I like him, but number of contracts becomes and issue)
Nathan Lawson – Gone
Andy Hilbert – Gone
Evgeni Nabokov – Keep and cut as needed for roster flexibility
Joel Martin – Gone
Jeremy Yablonski – Gone

So that clears out all, but 2 spots and those are TBD pending an upagrade. I don’t se Konopka or Martinek getting an offer from the Islanders until after July 1.

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 9:30 AM EST reply actions  

Evgeni Nabokov – Keep and cut as needed for roster flexibility

I highly doubt they toll his contract

"Wonder where Botta will go from here?" "to work for the Ministry of Truth?" ~ Original Rob
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Mar 4, 2011 9:33 AM EST up reply actions  

If they toll it

And he doesn’t show, does it count?

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 9:37 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I'm guesssing it counts until he doesn't show again and then he is suspended and released

I’m not sure Snow would toll him either, I tried to give what I would do and not project what Garth may do. My initial stance was threaten to toll to get him to report and then release him, but after all of the injuries I decided he did enough damage to merit tolling.

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 9:40 AM EST up reply actions  

I would toll it through the summer

Then just when he’s about way too fat and out of shape, release him. Mostly because I’m evil.

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 9:44 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I like it!

That being said, I thought they already asked the league to toll the contract and the league agreed?

Commissioner of the FIG pool, because I'm one terrible player.

by ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles on Mar 4, 2011 9:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Not to my knowledge

Media discussed the possibility to death, but I don’t think you can do it until he doesn’t live out this contract. Meaning, if he came today, he will have fulfilled his obligation…then he would be free. I don’t think they work in prorated amount of games (like he would owe 9 games), I think that would just be a salary issue (his money is prorated…not his time)

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 9:58 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Not sure he can just show up at this point either

That would allow him to show up for game 82 and say contract dispute resolved. He is suspended and the team would have to come to an agreement first.

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 10:34 AM EST up reply actions  

I think that

Would depend on the team’s stance really (although I’m not sure). If they decided the contract terms were met and gave him a check for one game, I’d assume everyone would let it go.

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 10:42 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I highly doubt they toll his contract

Why? I think the NHL will want him to, and I see no reason why Snow would go against the wishes of the NHL on this one.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Mar 4, 2011 9:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Snow: “Hey, I’ll make you guys a deal… I’ll release Nabby so he can star for one of your top teams, and you finally start using the same wheel of justice for us as you do for all other teams. Deal?”

Commissioner of the FIG pool, because I'm one terrible player.

by ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles on Mar 4, 2011 9:53 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Tolling Naby

If the Isles toll his contract then he becomes an asset which can be traded for someone else? Am I understanding the “toll” procedure correctly?

by Russel Ginart on Mar 4, 2011 10:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Don't think so

He still has that clause that says he passes through waivers first. So if no one picks him up that way, why would they trade for him. That’s why we didn’t try to do it now, and that carries over.

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 10:15 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Thanks Keith

Do the Isles get ANY compensation for loosing Naby to waivers? Like a late round draft pick? After all the team had to use a 6th RD pick to get Montoya because Naby did not show up.

by Russel Ginart on Mar 4, 2011 10:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Not sure but

Doubt it. I could possibly see them recouping the waiver funds, but since nothing was spent to get him, nothing would be given.

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 10:44 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

IMO

I am not familiar with the "tolling" procedure so I’m going to throw this out there.
We claimed Naby off waivers, he did not report, and we currently hold his (Red Wings) contract. We were forced to give up a 6th RD pick to get Montoya. Now the off season comes and he does not clear waivers and another team picks him up. It seems to me the NHL should be awarding the Islanders some kind of compensatory pick, similar to the NFL?

by Russel Ginart on Mar 4, 2011 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

I hear you

But at this point, he did us a favor (especially if Montoya keeps this up). Montoya is younger and probably at this point better than Nabby. If we had Nabby, probably zero chance of getting Montoya, and his DP-esque #s would probably have us clinically depressed as opposed to cautiously optimistic.

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 11:14 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I think the Islanders just want to be done with it, instead of letting the whole thing drag out and possibly needing to go to a mediator. Plus I’m not sure how the CBA deals with a tolled contract in a situation like Nabbys where he originally needed to clear waivers to be traded.

"Wonder where Botta will go from here?" "to work for the Ministry of Truth?" ~ Original Rob
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Mar 4, 2011 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

why not?

IF someone is interested in Old man Nabakov, could he sign with the Isles (i.e. report in the summer), then immediately sign a new contract that would supercede the old one and allow him to be traded there? Then everyone wins. Otherwise he can be freeze-dried in Siberia for all I care.

by martylnd on Mar 4, 2011 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

A whole lot of quasi-illegal loops to jump through

You can’t re-negotiate a contract under the current CBA, so he couldn’t just sign an extension to circumvent the current contract. If the Islanders agree that he has met his contract obligation it would have to be this season, not sure the summer counts. They would then have to trust him to agree to re-sign so that they could deal him, when at that point he is technically an UFA that can sign wherever he wants. No evidence he would do any of those things to help the Islanders or that the Islanders wouldn’t then just hold him and not trade him.

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think they'll get rid of Gillies completely

Especially with no legit enforcer in BPT. Remember how loyal Wang is, what the guys think of Gillies, and how much time he spent with Martin teaching him.

I wonder how much fear will contribute to signing the D players…such bad injury problems, but there are so many of them. Remember too that all of the Bridgeport contracts count and we do have to restock down there too. If you look at that roster right now, you can scrap half of it for next season…or add back some of what we have up here now…difficult decisions for Snow.

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 9:36 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Konopka and Martin? I think they both replace Gillies.

"Wonder where Botta will go from here?" "to work for the Ministry of Truth?" ~ Original Rob
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Mar 4, 2011 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Not at tha AHL level they won't

Haley’s not a heavyweight, Yabo’s out/awful. I don’t think anyone else will give Gillies and NHL contract, but definitely AHL, and I personally don’t see why we wouldn’t keep him at that level especially if we are going to be fielding a youg/small team of recent junior and college grads.

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 10:34 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Just noticed I wasn't really clear about AHL/NHL above

I have a head cold…kind of dopey!

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 10:35 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Just to follow-up on the AHL/NHL angle

All of my keep or leaves are based on NHL contracts even though AHL or NHL 50 combined is still going to be the max. I think the target number for total contracts is 46-47 since you need to be able to sign players due to injuries or take on additional contracts in trades as well.

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

no enforcer

what about using haley in that role?

by nullzero00 on Mar 5, 2011 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

He's a great middleweight, but I'm not sure we are gonna like how his fights with the Colton Orr's and Derek Boogaard's of the nhl happen.

Proud Islanders fan, the organization that iced the greatest team to ever play the game and won 4 straight cups. Best overall player in the nhl right now=Pavel Datsyuk.
I'm also an optimistic Knicks fan, pessimistic Mets fan, and a happy Jets fan.

by OzzyFan on Mar 7, 2011 11:17 AM EST up reply actions  

The RFAs need a littel bit more delicate pruning

Josh Bailey – should be re-signed
Kyle Okposo – should be re-signed
Michael Grabner – should be re-signed
Blake Comeau – should be re-signed
Michael Haley – replaces Gillies, but down a weight category
Ty Wishart – should be re-signed
Bruno Gervais – Can’t believe I’m saying this, but need depth on defense
Jack Hillen – should be re-signed
Al Montoya – totally dependent on Poulin’s knees, Nilsson signing and UFAs available
Jesse Joensuu – indifferent between him and Colliton, but Colliton seems to be in my favor today
Robin Figren – not given a shot with the big club, not ready or just not worth keeping?
Tomas Marcinko – not given a shot with the big club, not ready or just not worth keeping?
Dustin Kohn – Need depth on Defense
Dylan Reese – Need depth on defense, but it was him or the Chef
Rob Hisey – not given a shot with the big club, not ready or just not worth keeping?
Jeremy Colliton – could be between him and Joensuu, but today I can’t recall what Jesse is going to bring that we haven’t seen yet

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 9:38 AM EST reply actions  

Montoya has some control of the situation too

If he plays 10 or so more games and keeps his save % above .915 it will be hard not to sign him for at least another year.

You mean to tell me shooting the puck from 70 feet out doesn't earn us extra goals?

by Anarcurt on Mar 4, 2011 9:56 AM EST up reply actions  

HAHA

Rec’d!

Thank you Matt Moulson!
It doesn't hurt being an Islander fan....but it sure hurts playing for them...get well soon, um, everybody....

by CharlieIsles on Mar 4, 2011 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

If he keeps a .930...

he might price himself off the island… we need to bring dylan reese back up to make sure that doesn’t happen.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Mar 4, 2011 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Dylan Reese Invesments LLC

Your hedge against the salary cap…

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 10:50 AM EST via mobile up reply actions   2 recs

Isnt he an RFA?

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Mar 4, 2011 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

i think he is for one more year

hes 26 i think UFA status is at 27 right?

"Mario Lemiuex… I used to respect you."- Turgeon1992

by Zhora on Mar 4, 2011 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

27, or after your 7th pro season

So yeah, Al is an RFA.

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Sweet!

Outstanding…Ours!

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

According to CAP GEEK

He is an RFA next year. It’s interesting that as a 6th pick he’s only getting $750K (after three 10% RFA raises) when he is in the NHL this year. Bailey, a 9th pick on his ELC is getting $850K base.
If Montoya continues to shine I think he gets a million as a gesture of good faith, or even a two year deal. I don’t care how much you love RDP, and expect KP or Mikko to carry the load, this team can use a #1 goaltender and if it CAN BE Al Montoya, I want to see him arouund… if worse comes to worse and KP is ready after the New Year (Highly doubtful) let Ricky ride the waiver wire down to Bridgeport… It can’t be stressed enough that NOBODY is ever going to take even a $2M/year 10 year chance on rickey being healthy for more than 20 minutes.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Mar 4, 2011 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I would definitely go with Joensuu over Colliton

He had one good game (vs. Avs) and that was it. They guy can’t even catch a pass.

by jbranny on Mar 4, 2011 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

And I would

Go with Haley over both. More speed, hitting, and JAM. I might try to hold both of them on two ways or at BPT, but in pecking order, who knows. About all those two bring to the table are underused size.

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 10:47 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

JJ is making progress

Colliton is still the same underachiever he was the first time around. In a couple seasons I think both will get bounced by Lee but JJ still has a shot.

You mean to tell me shooting the puck from 70 feet out doesn't earn us extra goals?

by Anarcurt on Mar 4, 2011 10:49 AM EST up reply actions  

I think you need all three...

Colliton and Haley are good RH centers that can be used in BPT with Ulstrom and Cizikas.
Joensuu is a good depth forward that gives BPT some size and he can play responsible bottom six minutes on either wing.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Mar 4, 2011 10:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Definitely

I think we still have a bit of time before BPT is completely overflowing and we have to start cutting guys. But next offseason, we should be really stocking the place with Snow’s picks.

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 10:53 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

true my decisions were for contracts that kept them in the big leagues

there is still that 50 contract limit that would be best at around 46 for wiggle room.

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I would add Gregoire to the prospects list

He’s a junior but he could want to make the jump. I think he stays for his senior year but it is a possibility and he would easily make BPT.

You mean to tell me shooting the puck from 70 feet out doesn't earn us extra goals?

by Anarcurt on Mar 4, 2011 9:59 AM EST reply actions  

I was trying to keep it to those that we could lose the rights to.

Cizikas is a special situation, as there are limits to the number of Overage players you can have on a team

"Wonder where Botta will go from here?" "to work for the Ministry of Truth?" ~ Original Rob
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Mar 4, 2011 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Gotcha that makes sense

You mean to tell me shooting the puck from 70 feet out doesn't earn us extra goals?

by Anarcurt on Mar 4, 2011 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

I think casey is a no brainer...

They need him at BPT, he is in that DOMINATING category at the major junior level… and he has a shot to make the NHL with a good few months in the bridge. casey just turned 20, so there’s no issue there. With a little Roster magic they might even give Ullstrom some time on the wing…. How would a Ullstrom-Lee-Rakhshani line look in BPT?
Boy, do they need some righties.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Mar 4, 2011 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Currently Signed and Will Be UFAs

Doug Weight: GONE, will be sitting next to Dean Chinoweth
Zenon Konopka, re-sgined
Trevor Gillies: GONE
Radek Martinek: Traded in the summer
Nathan Lawson: GONE
Andy Hilbert: GONE
Evgeni Nabokov: tolled and used in a trade for an asset?
Joel Martin: GONE
Jeremy Yablonski: Jeremy who? GONE

by Russel Ginart on Mar 4, 2011 10:18 AM EST reply actions  

How is Martinek going to be traded in the summer if he’s a UFA on July 1st? Who would take a 35 year old broken down defenseman before then, especially now that the trade deadline has passed?

by Fabtraption on Mar 4, 2011 10:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Same with Nabokov, you can in theory trade him, but he would need to clear waivers first if that makes any sense at all. I think he would only have to clear waivers for those teams that put in the claim when the Islanders grabbed him and I could see a team at the cap limit having to give a player up just to grab a player on waivers.

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 10:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Not sure Martinek will be gone.

But his injury situation is a real wild card. If Garth is sick of putting up with it, he might be out the door, otherwise for 1.5M he is a very good defenseman if healthy.

by jbranny on Mar 4, 2011 10:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes

And also that he was the GP leader on the blueline until last game. :(

By the way 1919, Martinek actually won’t be a 35+ on this next contract. His birthday isn’t until August, and the cutoff for that is “as of June 30.”

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 12:01 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

My mistake, I thought all along he made the +35 cut

Well there goes my whole theory!

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

For the love of the Mamas and the Papas

That is just crazy. And HE will probably lead the team in goalie games played.

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

He was practicing today, too

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Mar 4, 2011 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

With a new helmet

Looks like Healy’s old one

No pressure on the cheek on those I think…just the chin.

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes it does look like Healy's

It also looks like he was told “Rick just sit in the back for a while. we’ll call you if we need you.”

by Russel Ginart on Mar 4, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

wow

I better check to see if my helmet’s still in my hockey bag… if he painted my Smitty-white helmet blue I’ll be annoyed.

Fast strikers, give the defenders difficulty!
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Mar 4, 2011 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Boy, that cheek still looks puffy

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Anders Lee

Off topic, as he is not going to be in the 50, but he was just named CCHA rookie of the month for third time this season. Awesome. Go Irish.

by JohnI on Mar 4, 2011 10:27 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

thanks

Not surprising, he had 2 rookie of the weeks during that time too, a few game winning goals.

I can’t wait till he makes the NHL

"Wonder where Botta will go from here?" "to work for the Ministry of Truth?" ~ Original Rob
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Mar 4, 2011 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

I think talking him out of school...

…would be like talking Nick Cage out of a bad movie.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Mar 4, 2011 10:30 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

You knew damn well I was going to rec this

Coen Bros.? Check.
Indirect needle at Cage fan TMC? Check.

Great parallels all the way through.

/ducks TMC flying object

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

That was pretty good. 2 thumbs up.

But no “The Lady Killers”?
“A Serious Man” – You know that has to be DP with his luck.

by The Danish Backhand of Judgement on Mar 4, 2011 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep

Tough question...Notre Dame or Bridgeport...Touchdown Jesus or crime scene?

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 10:39 AM EST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Rudy or...

doodie?

Thank you Matt Moulson!
It doesn't hurt being an Islander fan....but it sure hurts playing for them...get well soon, um, everybody....

by CharlieIsles on Mar 4, 2011 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

good stuff

Figren wants out. I think they let him go. Marcinko, Reese, Gillies, Nabokov, Yablonski, and one at least of Lawson and J. Martin are gone. That’s seven contracts for certain, and I’ll hedge and say that one of Weight or Martinek won’t return either. That’s eight, and as has been observed, this is enough to fit in whomever else you like while retaining everyone else.

If you need more room, I’d say that both Lawson and Martin go (replaced by CODY RO uh, Anders Nilsson), Kohn would go, one at least of Hisey or Colliton will be released or traded, and Mottau would be dealt for a minor pick or packaged with a pick to move up. I don’t see Hunter bought out or moved unless they get a nice FA or a big deal. So by my math that would leave the following groups under contract:

G – (5) DiPietro, Koskinen, Montoya, Nilsson, Poulin
D -(12) de Haan, de Hart, Eaton, Gervais, Hamonic, Hillen, Jurcina, Katic, Klementyev, MacDonald, Streit, Wishart
F – (17) Bailey, Comeau, DiBenedetto, Grabner, Haley, Hunter, Konopka, M Martin, Moulson, Neiderreiter, Neilsen, Okposo, Parenteau, Rakhshani, Romano, Tavares, Ullstrom
*plus (4) – the lottery pick, a FA, either Hisey or Colliton, and at least one other (waiver/trade/whatevs) that we’re not thinking of now.

That’s 38 unless I’ve really missed something. That gives the team more than enough freedom to re-sign Martinek, keep both Hisey and Colliton (instead of just one), and take on players instead of just extra picks if they make a trade.

Fast strikers, give the defenders difficulty!
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Mar 4, 2011 11:36 AM EST reply actions  

You're hired

I think that’s a solid round-up. We should check back after all is said and done and see how close everyone was.

  • I’m still wondering if Marti gets another deal, since he wasn’t dealt, and maybe Bruno takes a deal as a sous chef.
  • I’d like Joensuu to stick around if he’s willing, but I think that’s a longshot. Don’t think he’s a missing piece, I’m just curious if a guy like that could continue to evolve.

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

crap

I forgot Joensuu. Make that 39 contracts.

Fast strikers, give the defenders difficulty!
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Mar 4, 2011 4:19 PM EST up reply actions  

If we need to fill roster spots

maybe we can ask Yashin and Witt to come back since we are still paying them lol

James T Paulson

by Jtpdolphins2009 on Mar 4, 2011 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Missing Mottau

He’s already signed for next year

You mean to tell me shooting the puck from 70 feet out doesn't earn us extra goals?

by Anarcurt on Mar 4, 2011 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

naw, didn't forget

I traded him. =D

Fast strikers, give the defenders difficulty!
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Mar 4, 2011 4:19 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

#grabsisfast

Grabner is so fast he comes in here and causes crazy typos while I’m still typing.

by Les Beaver on Mar 4, 2011 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Sucks Nielsen

The scourge of the Nielsen clan…

"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Website: Lighthousehockey.com
Twitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Mar 4, 2011 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

He may be expecting Mottau to get the waive-ho

Although I guess he’d still be under contract then anyway.

I still don’t think what we saw of Mottau this year is what he can deliver (not that he’s great or anything). I suspect damaged goods with that hip, along with a side of Wisniewski.

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

if anything happens ...

in the off-season regarding the arena situation, all bets are off as far what we think the g.m. may or may not do. for example, if a miracle happens and a new arena deal is worked out, i think the purse strings will immediately loosen up and FA’s who never thought about coming here will suddenly be interested.

by dose on Mar 4, 2011 12:41 PM EST reply actions  

I have never bought the idea ...

that guys don’t decline to come here because of the arena. if the $$$ is in the same ballpark as an offer elsewhere, who would choose to play in a horrible place? not to mention the uncertainty of where the team will be and the possibility of having to move a family, that comes along with no arena deal in place.

by dose on Mar 4, 2011 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

Its not the arena itself

Its not playing in an old arena per say…..its the instability of the current situation that the arena contributes to.

by neologizer on Mar 4, 2011 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Dose, you're arguing that the arena/uncertaint *is* a factor, right?

I think that’s how I read your comment, but the double-negative has me thrown off a bit.

In any case, I think it’s the whole combo of factors to do with arena/attendance/image/future uncertainty. Along with, as we’ve seen (including Nystrom The Younger’s Flames teammates), how many players are truly clueless about what Long Island actually is.

I suppose just seeing the hotel, the parking lot, and the concrete mausoleum in winter, it looks like a crap suburb of that big city off in the distance. As opposed to a sweet place to live and hang, especially if you have the money of a pro athlete.

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Good point...

about the double negative thing. That was my Norm Crosby/Professor Irwin Corey influence. Anyway, clearly the general uncertainty and all that entails is what most discourages commitment by FA’s. But I’m pretty sure the arena itself has been a factor when guys consider offers that are in the same ballpark dollar-wise.

by dose on Mar 4, 2011 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Ha, just wanted to make sure

Yeah, I think the arena itself is one of several factors that, on their own, are not deal-killers. But taken together.

If that arena ever fills again on a nightly basis before it’s imploded, it will be one of the most electric buildings in the league. All the plushy surfaces in a bunch of the new arenas really dampen the atmosphere.

I hope for young fans’ sake that they get one more shot at feeling that building really come alive, because new arenas rarely live up in that department.

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree completely.

Ratty as it may be, it’s still an awesome place to watch a game and even more so when there’s a big crowd. I also think if the team contended, they would sell out nightly at the Coliseum, or at Dutch Lane sump if they played there.

by dose on Mar 4, 2011 2:20 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

i've made that sump comment ...

a bunch of times, because i really feel that way. but i’m not even sure the damn sump, or any sump, is still out there. i’ll bet they’re all filled in with condos or whatever.

by dose on Mar 4, 2011 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Growing up as a kid near/around Long Island

and with other kids as well, we all really kinda hated it.

But maybe Long Island is a nice place to live when you make the money of a pro athlete, not a kid making $6 an hour at the corner deli.

by Fabtraption on Mar 4, 2011 2:45 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

How many NHL players

actually live where they play? If guessing its a minority

by neologizer on Mar 4, 2011 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Of course

I’m just saying, as a teenager without any money, Long Island sucked.

Although teenagers probably say that about anywhere they live, so…

by Fabtraption on Mar 4, 2011 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Key words

LI, No money and teenager. I those words contributed to my enthusiastic embrace of going away for college

by neologizer on Mar 4, 2011 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Part of being a teenager is Hatin' on your Neighborhood

Footloose, Rad, Dirty Dancing, “We Gotta Get Out of This Place” <—-SMH!

by Les Beaver on Mar 4, 2011 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Too funny

To think my LI cousins used to mock us for living in Brooklyn (all of the stereotypes of being Vinnie Barbarino, even though they were more WOPy) and all the while we were having a great time living in the city, taking the subway wherever we wanted to go and knowing the city well enough to avoid the trouble spots. Turns out all they do now is spend their time in traffic commuting into the city.

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 3:22 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

But maybe Long Island is a nice place to live when you make the money of a pro athlete, not a kid making $6 an hour at the corner deli.

Ha yes — and I certainly don’t know that end from personal experience, I just know what money (not mine) can get you.

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Comeau v Hunter

Hunter is going to be a $2M fourth liner next year. Comeau is probably going to be miffed that a team under the cap floor won’t give him 3 years @ 3/4 of what Hunter is making.
the last three years…
Hunter
55-14-17-31-(-8)
61-11-17-28-(+3)
17-1-3-4(-3)

Comeau
53-7-18-25(-17)
61-17-18-35(-2)
60-17-20-37(-17) He will probably eclipse 70 games, 20 goals and 25 assists(if Bailey would shoot more)

Both are 3rd line wings in this period. Hunter is 31, Comeau is 25.
Comeau needs to play the RW next year and give them four RH options on that side. PAP,Okie,Blake and Trent… if trent can be dealt at some point next year they will have Haley or Rakhshani to fill the void at less than half the salary. Comeau is worth keeping around for double his salary even if he contributes at the same goal/point pace and lowers his plus/minus just through the general improvement of the team.
Trent on the other hand did a pretty good job defensively under Gordon, but might even get some more opportunities with an offense that creates opportunities in teh nuetral zone rather than with a high pressure forecheck. It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out… but I surely hope we don’t lose Comeau because of a “loyalty” contract given to trent.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Mar 4, 2011 12:53 PM EST reply actions  

Considering Blake is an RFA

we retain his rights regardless, right? Unless he Bergies his way into a one-year suspension by not signing a contract by training camp, I don’t think there will be any trouble retaining him, though I won’t be surprised if his contract discussions are lengthy.

by Fabtraption on Mar 4, 2011 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe...

Blake has two more RFA years, this and next. He should get his 10% raises, or maybe tey just cover both for a $1-1.2 per as a show of good faith. The point I was making was that Hunter has cost us $6M for loyalty… and Comeau gets shit on at almost every turn. I like Trent, and at the time it sounded like a pretty good deal because he had that really nice year with Sillinger… but like neo says below… who would trade for Trent Hunter? So now he is almost as valuable as Yashin or Witt.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Mar 4, 2011 1:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Here's a question

If given the opportunity, do you give Comeau a Nielsen/A-Mac deal? In other words, do you go longer on him for an annual discount of what he might expect on the open market? (Note: Both 47 and 51’s cases were slightly different, but the concept here is similar…)

If he tells me he’s a 30-goal scorer waiting to happen, then I say “Lovely. We’ll qualify you now, and you can try your luck in UFA two summers from now.” But if he tells me he’s a 20-goal scorer who wants to be a good PK/jack-of-all-trades and even a RIGHT WING when needed, then I might just say, “You know what? I will commit four years to you at a discounted middle-six rate. But you are fined for every second COZO.”

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

No

I wouldn’t if I was the Isles, With 2 more RFA years, the Isles are in the driver seat. So a long term deal would be what 3-4 years (giving up 2 years of UFA) and based on what projection? Him being a 20goal a year scorer? How much would the Isles really save in a longer deal? Versus the risk… his production goes down, he gets injured, he becomes immovable in trades or better younger cheaper options come from the prospect pool. Also Blake seems like he can drift off mentally, I can’t think of better incentive then annual contract negociations to keep him focused. Maybe in a year if he’s on track for another20+ goals but not now.

As far as Blakes position its not like he’s worried he’ll go back to the AHL and collect a measly salary (like Amac and Franzy when they signed). If the Isles don’t carry him somebody else will.

by neologizer on Mar 4, 2011 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Very true
As far as Blakes position its not like he’s worried he’ll go back to the AHL and collect a measly salary (like Amac and Franzy when they signed)

And he and his agent probably think there is a windfall to be had in UFA if he continues getting better. Probably past the point of worrying about staying in the NHL.

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I would be fair but frugal...

I think the key to comeau negotiations are making it a one-way deal. Thus limiting the advantages of sending him down if he hits a cold run… that is a option with a 6-9-15 first half with the prospects filling up at BPT.
I’d give him 2 years with a little something more than his 10%, around a $1M, with a $20K bonus for every fight he wins on Hockeyfights’com.
It’s so iffy with him… with Bergenhiem, he skated and played hard, but I just don’t think he skated to the places coaches wanted him to and he worked hard, then ran out of juice. With Comeau, I can’t tell if he is just testing the laws of efficiency of motion, trying to slow plays down, or maybe his brain doesn’t work as fast as his skates… and that isn’t all that fast… BUT HE PRODUCES… You’d like to say that if Bailey comes out with teh cape he had on the first six games they have three 1A lines… but there’s also a chance that Comeau regresses stuck on the third line with a stalled Bailey and BLEH… we’re all looking for Rakhshani, Ullstrom or Cizikas for a spark.
I’d try to get in front of that with teh $1m for 2 years to cover his RFA and then deal with it afterwards.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Mar 4, 2011 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

just testing the laws of efficiency of motion

Beautiful theory, and plausible.

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

You will be credited as one of the paper's authors

But JP has already slept with the professor to get his name listed first.

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 5:44 PM EST up reply actions  

who would trade for Hunter?

When does Comeau become a UFA? a year or 2… then he gets his payday. Unless the Isles and him want to sign a longer term lower priced “safe” contract. I don’t see that with him though, he seems like the type that needs incentives like annual contract renewals. If there is any contract players should be miffed at its gotta be DPs

by neologizer on Mar 4, 2011 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Hopefully Blake (and his agent) take a look-see at what PAP re-upped for

If Comeau is retained (I expect he will be), the Isles start to set themselves up for those “good problems to have,” which I think is what we’ve all been dying to see.

I just love, love, love that soon there will be competition for jobs among young talented forwards with an actual future, instead of “Well if we make Comrie a 1st-liner, maybe he’ll hit the town less. On the other hand, if we make him a 1st-liner, maybe he’ll hit the town more.”

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Is "town" a euphemism for "Duff"?

I never know with you kids today and your twitter talk.

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

At least hitting that might keep him in shape.

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 3:50 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I love that Comrie now is a perpetual scratch.

Hahaha, remember when we tried to make him a thing?

by Fabtraption on Mar 4, 2011 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Was he?

I thought he just sucked.

by Fabtraption on Mar 4, 2011 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

a little harsh

He doesn’t suck, he just isn’t a first-line, 20-minute forward. He’s a complementary player. Those Isles had nothing but complementary players and fill-ins. It wasn’t really Comrie’s fault that he was being asked to go rack up 75 points on a top line. (And having a huge opening night against Buffalo didn’t help soothe the inevitable for the fans.)

Fast strikers, give the defenders difficulty!
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Mar 4, 2011 4:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll give him this much, he didn't back down from a challenge.

He may have floated and dangled too much, but you could never accuse him of not showing up when challenged. For that at least, I give him a lot of credit.

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

He has been injured- and last year he had mono.

He does not suck, either- he is just not a top player.
Pound for pound and inch for inch, he is a pretty tough guy, too.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Mar 4, 2011 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I wouldn't say comrie sucks, he got skills.

Proud Islanders fan, the organization that iced the greatest team to ever play the game and won 4 straight cups. Best overall player in the nhl right now=Pavel Datsyuk.
I'm also an optimistic Knicks fan, pessimistic Mets fan, and a happy Jets fan.

by OzzyFan on Mar 5, 2011 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Sticky Situation

Well … They have to weigh the value of some of the borderline UFA’s against the value of prospects that have to be signed or lose their rights. That is the first part.

Then they have to decide which RFA’s are still a part of the future … and weigh that against the UFA’s and prospects that they still want to be part of the future … and then hope that there is room to sign (not that they have to) … who they draft in the 1st round this year.

With so many promising prospects emerging Garth has some serious maneuvering to do … including a package for an NHL proven veteran perhaps.

by 19 Isle in NJ 22 on Mar 4, 2011 12:57 PM EST reply actions  

Might have to keep Yablonski if Gillies keeps getting suspended.......

Jeremy was a 6 time Canadian Gold Gloves champ. He and Gillies had a good tilt last season when Yabo was with Binghampton. I really hope the Islanders call him up for the last Pens game, just to clean Matt Cooke’s clock.

.

"Being thrown under the bus and scorching the back of my neck with a revolving red light."

by FireGarthSnow on Mar 4, 2011 2:34 PM EST reply actions  

Bad Idea Jeans

Call up a goon to replace a goon, prove idiots right about what a lousy franchise the Isles run. No thank you.

Fast strikers, give the defenders difficulty!
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Mar 4, 2011 4:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I dont see Yablonski coming up at all.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Mar 4, 2011 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Buy out Hunter?

666,666 to do it. With all the injuries, might be time. Martinek will hit the 35+ level, again with the injury bug. Yeah, I know, who on this team isn’t hurt……Hilbert leaves on his own accord I think. Toll Nabokov, as I think the NHL will want this to happen with the next CBA coming due. Reese hasn’t shown much this time around, so I think they let him walk. With Weight and Lawson gone, should get the team under the 50 if everyone else is brought back. Unless it is a solid 2nd line center, I don’t see them active in the FA market. After the draft we’ll know more.

"Being thrown under the bus and scorching the back of my neck with a revolving red light."

by FireGarthSnow on Mar 4, 2011 2:49 PM EST reply actions  

Why?

If he was healthy he’d be playing on the 3rd/4th line right now. Its not like the cap is an issue right now. The Cap could be an issue 3+ years down the road when your reupping all the current elite RFAs (JT,KO, FN, JB etc) and buying out Hunter right now would reduce cap flexibly right when you would need it

by neologizer on Mar 4, 2011 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

10 Games for Gillies

You mean to tell me shooting the puck from 70 feet out doesn't earn us extra goals?

by Anarcurt on Mar 4, 2011 3:21 PM EST reply actions  

cmon gillies hit was worse...

Clutterbuck was guilty of charging and maybe crosschecking…but gillies hit him in the head after the whistle..no no

Lighthouse Hockey: Providing shelter to Botta's exiles!

by backstop87 on Mar 4, 2011 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagee

Clutterbuck hit a defenseless player from behind into the boards, that was a worse hit

James T Paulson

by Jtpdolphins2009 on Mar 4, 2011 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

But DiBo turned his body at the last second, at that point clutterbuck had already committed to the hit....and Dibo also had the puck when he was hit.

From a rules standpoint…Gillies hit was worse..It was after the whistle, Clutterbuck didnt have the puck, it was blindside, and targeted the head

Lighthouse Hockey: Providing shelter to Botta's exiles!

by backstop87 on Mar 4, 2011 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

What whistle? The penalty was on Minnie and they hadn't touched the puck.

DiBo didn’t turn last second either like he was blosking out the forecheck, he was simply getting into position to retrieve the puck and Clutterbuck chose to run him.

Gillies hit was high, but not a blindside either. He drives into his shoulder and gets his hands up. Not a legal hit, but not blindside.

Sarcasm is my permanent font.

by Hockey1919 on Mar 4, 2011 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

your right, no whistle till after Gillies hit

I’m not defending Clutterbuck…but Gillies should have just dropped the gloves…one things for sure: no way did that hit deserve 10 games…MAYBE 2! I just read an article that called Gillies the dirtiest guy in the league..WTF!

Lighthouse Hockey: Providing shelter to Botta's exiles!

by backstop87 on Mar 4, 2011 8:24 PM EST up reply actions  

look at the replay again

DiBo turned his back well before and Clutterbuck takes a few strides before he hits him

James T Paulson

by Jtpdolphins2009 on Mar 4, 2011 6:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Looked @ the replay again..

Now I dont know what to think…DiBo makes a 90 degree turn towards the boards @ :19…less than a second b4 he was hit… but his head was already turned towards the boards b4 that…so what constitutes a blindside hit? Head position or body position?

Lighthouse Hockey: Providing shelter to Botta's exiles!

by backstop87 on Mar 4, 2011 8:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Clusterfutz should get games for faking an injury...

He knew that Gillies wanted more than to jam him through the boards… Clusterfutz has been there before as a PREDATORY OFFENDER. Clusterfutz knows there’s a price tag on his hits… but he doesn’t want to pay it because there’s no cash in his account. HE IS BANKRUPT OF COURAGE…. so he turtles… and figures, “hey, while I’m down here I can grab my head and the refs will shoo that goon away”…. then he gets up and laughs.
Amazingly the same tactic was used by Sean Avery last year when Gillies confronted him… UNFORTUNATELY tangradi appeared to be doing the same thing samwiched between two gutless predatory DOUCHEBAGS… and Gillies is eating 19 games worth of his salary because of it.
Clutterdouch should send him a check.

Lighthouse Hockey: where "you better check yourself before you rec yourself" -bobl
If your life isn't pathetic enough already, follow me on twitter @JPinVA

by JPinVA on Mar 4, 2011 4:01 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Quinn's Gillies post is here

New thread for suspension links and sundry.

Lighthouse Hockey: Send us your cold, your poor, your healthy goalies.

by Dominik on Mar 4, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey Web, thanks a million for putting this together. we’ve discussed the 50 contract limit on other threads, and who may not be back as a result. Some are obvious, others not so much. This is the first time it has been listed accurately at this level though. I am going to think about it, and come back later and add my thoughts on who will be back, who will not. I’ve been scratching out defensive parrings on paper for a few weeks now. some interesting thoughts. Good work again, as usual.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Mar 4, 2011 4:01 PM EST reply actions  

A lot has to be done this offseason.

RFAs- Resign Okposo, Bailey, Grabner, Wishart no doubt. Comeau, Haley, Hillen, Joensuu, and Montoya also deserve contracts but aren’t locks. The rest of the RFA’s are replaceable.

UFAs- The only UFA that has to be signed is Konopka.

De Haan and Niederreiter should both count against the cap next season with Nino on the Island and De Haan in BP.

Anders Nilsson is a MUST SIGN prospect. Since there is a ton of crowding in Bridgeport with Poulin and Koskinen, it would be best to sign Nilsson, then loan him back to Lulea for the year.

I’d like to see Dehart and Cizikas both signed to play in Bridgeport.

Jason Gregoire has earned a contract for sure. Pulling him out also pushes Brock up the depth charts at North Dakota.

Anders Lee has proven himself at the college level in his freshman year. He’s a big body so he could be effective in Bridgeport right away. He should be signed.

by nyislanders93 on Mar 4, 2011 5:37 PM EST reply actions  

Starting with who should not be brought back...and must sign prospects

First, in my decision making, I feel some of the guys I would like signed will probably never be NHLers, but will be needed in Bridgeport as part of the development process, and also in some cases, they will serve as depth players/ injury fill-ins. I’ve also included players on the bubble. This means if we make an upgrade, they would be gone without question, but may be gone anyway.
-——————————
Beginnng with currently signed players against the 50 contract limit:
trade or buyout -

Tony Romano and Mike Mottau.
On the bubble – Trent Hunter, Mark Eaton, Rick Dipietro.

Rationale: Romano is going nowhere, plus he is taking up ice-time from incoming prospects. Time to begin his European Career. Mottau is too soft, huge disappointment, last on depth list. I’d rather give his ice-time to kids. Hunter may be done as a player in the new NHL. Mark Eaton is too soft and gets knocked off puck too easily. He also has no offense to his game so is a poor top four pairing. If Eaton is around, it means we lack depth or have a lot of injuries. He would be best as a 7th or 8th D man, but I still don’t like his game. Addition by subtraction. Rick needs to prove he can continue his comeback without team having to risk sacrificing NHL games in the process; otherwise, Dipietro’s comback should really be in Bridgeport. No one will be crazy enough to pick him up off waivers with the contract, and if someone did, they’d be doing us a favour.
-————————
Currently signed and will be RFAs:
If untradeable, do not resign -

Robin Figren, Tomas Marcinko, Dylan Reese and Rob Hisey. On the bubble – Bruno Gervais, Jack Hillen, Al Montoya, Jesse Joensuu, Duston Kohn, Jeremy Colliton.

Rationale: I think it obvious why I would not resign the four players mentioned here, although some may like Hisey. I will therefore focus on the bubble players. Beginning with goal: if Montoya keeps it up for remainder of season, he has earned a one year contract. If he pans out, it will buy valuable development time for our young goalie prospects. Moving on to defense: The Isles desperately lack experience behind their blueline. If they can not bring in an established vet, they may not be able to part with Gervais, one of the few defenseman they have who have played over 300 NHL games. Jack Hillen falls under same lack of depth category as Gervais, having about 160 NHL games experience. That is not much, but better than most. Hillen plays a different role behind blueline than Gervais (who really is a third pairing, soft – depth defenseman). Hillen projects as a speedy 2nd pairing offensive D (Isles like to put two of these types of D man together as a pairing). The Isles have a lot of depth prospects in this area (De Haan, Katic, Donovan, Ness) plus top D man Mark Streit. Hillen has shown spurts of promise, but by no means has he arrived in the role, and he may never. At this point, however, the depth prospects for this role need valuable development time. Hillen buys that for Isles. Kohn is a depth D man. Forward Jeremy Colliton is a minor leaguer, depth forward. Colliton is a right defensive, physical centre who can play wing and is good at faceoffs. Right centres is an organizational weakness for Isles. Emphasized by the fact that Colliton is the top right centre in Isles system.
-—————————
Currently signed and will be UFAs:
Do not resign -

Doug Weight, Nathan Lawson, Andy Hilbert, Joel Martin. On the bubble – Radek Martinek.

Rationale: Weight is already retired and in the office. Hilbert is at best a depth player but the Isles will have depth next year in their system in same role Hilbert would have provided. Time to give ice-time to players who have greater potential. Back to the ECL for Joel Martin. Radek Martinek falls under same category as Bruno Gervais, if not more so. Sure many would like to see an upgrade here. Barring that, even if Martinek only plays 40 games next year – he has played more this year – he is Isle’s most experienced D man, can babysit someone, and, Martinek is known for being a good teacher for young D. If no upgrade, 40 games from Martinek is better for development than the alternatives.
-—————————————————
UFAs that should be resigned:

Zenon Konopka, Trevor Gillies, Jeremy Yablonski, Evgeni Nabokov.

Rationale: I was all for trading Z early on, but he has proven that the kids need him for a while. Plus, he can teach the kids to improve their faceoffs, much like Bryan Trottier did for Mario’s Penguins when the won two cups and the role of faceoff man was all that kept Trottier in the NHL – it was noted by more than a few that Trottier not coming back was a factor in Pens not winning third straight cup, losing in seven games to Isles. Trevor Gillies has earned it. At least one more year. Yablonski is needed in AHL for same role as Gillies in NHL – plus it gives us depth at this role. Nabokov – as much as we dislike his attitude, this is about an asset that may give a return – 3rd rounder maybe by next season – so I say Toll him.

Prospect that should be signed:

Calvin De Haan, Tony Dehart, Anders Nilsson, David Toews, Brian Day, Shane Sims, Casey Cizikas.

Rationale: Dehaan has learned all he can in OHL; however, he needs to bulk up a bit more, and should not be rushed to NHL. History has not been kind to teams nor prospects when too many rookies or inexperienced players have been on the same defense, particularly when on same pairing. Let DeHaan develop properly in AHL for at least a year. We have too many kids on D now developing in NHL. Tony Dehart is too old to play OHL, and may be a depth, 3rd pairing middle-weight physical D. Nilsson has to be signed or we lose him due to new transfer agreement with Sweden. Sign him and loan him back to his Swedish team b/c we will have Poulin and Koskinen in AHL next year, and spotting in NHL. Toews, Day and Sims are all depth prospects who may never have an NHL career, although Day may have most potential. Nonetheless, they are better options than a number of our AHL players, and add developmental depth there. Cizikas is one of several potential draft steals the last three years. He is not NHL ready. Watching him in World Juniors, my father thought he looked a bit like John Tonelli along the boards. High praise, but this kid may be a solid third line centre, or solid fourth liner. He would look great with Martin and Haley if all three pan out.

by CanadianIsleslifer on Mar 6, 2011 11:39 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip and shoulder surgery not required.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Being Reasonable About Garth Snow’s First Rounders
Billy_smith_si_cover_small
LightHouse Hockey game on!
Gigantor15_small
LHH Poster's 25U25 Consensus
Jt_small
The New York Islanders and The Rebuild

Recent FanPosts

Warlord2_small
Breaking Down the Cloutier - Salo Fight
Dutchlogo_small
LHH off-season fantasy league
890_1__small
Expectations: Strome
Small
The Angstlander -- Inside the mind of an anxious Islanders fan (that means you!)
Small
Now that Phoenix has found itself a new owner...
Tubby_goalie_gif_small
Is Garth Snow actually drafting well, or are we all just pr*j*ct*ng again?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
What else is Russian sports media telling us?

  136 votes | Results

Isles Reading

Islanders Schedule

1979-80


May 24, 1980: Tonelli to Nystrom. At long last, the steady build of the New York Islanders from expansion doormat to surprise semifinalist to annual contender reaches the promised land: Buoyed by a late season trade for Butch Goring that gave the team the depth up the middle GM Bill Torrey had been seeking, the Islanders knock off the Philadelphia Flyers in six games.

The victory justified the faith in coach Al Arbour who guided them from their second season to their first Stanley Cup seven seasons later. The Islanders would not be the first expansion team to win the Stanley Cup, but they would be the only one capable of a dynasty.

1980-81


May 21, 1981: This time it was much easier. After falling to "only" 91 points in the 1979-80 season, the Islanders returned to their division title tradition, piling up 110 points -- a whole 13 points over second-place Philadelphia.

Between the quarterfinals (where they beat the upstart Oilers in six games) and the finals, the Islanders reeled off eight consecutive wins -- with a four-game sweep of archrival Rangers in between. As they defeated the Minnesota North Stars in five games for their second Cup, their goal difference in the final was a combined +10.

1981-82


May 16, 1982: Another year, another landslide title. The Islanders won the Patrick Division by a whopping 26 points over the second-place Rangers, and were seven points clear of their nearest competition for the President's Trophy, the still-not-quite-ripe Edmonton Oilers.

A first-round scare against the Pittsburgh Penguins turned in the Isles' favor thanks to John Tonelli's heroics, and a true dynasty was on its way: Past the Rangers in six games, then an eight-game sweep of the Quebec Nordiques and Vancouver Canucks to run away with the Stanley Cup.

1982-83


May 17, 1983: Not so fast, whipper-snappers. The Edmonton Oilers' steadily rising challenge for league supremacy took them all the way to the finals for the first time, where the New York Islanders summarily dispatched them in a four-game sweep. For the Islanders, the Dynasty was secured. For the Oilers, it was a powerful lesson in where talent ends and the demands of playoff hockey begin.

Four years, four Cups, 16 consecutive playoff series wins (a record that would grow to 19 until the rematch with the Oilers the following year). Mike Bossy scored 60 goals yet again, and Wayne Gretzky became acquainted with Billy Smith's crease.


Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Warlord2_small Mark D

Lighthouse_hockey_logo_2_medium_small Keith Quinn

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Hg_small Chris McNally

Master of FIGs and Power Tablature

Icon3_small ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein

71096_479208120482_1257968_n_small David Hanssen