Trivino: Wait, What Qualifies as 'Demons' Exactly?
Friday CBS/WFAN ran a follow up article attempting to add context to the arrest of Islanders prospect Corey Trivino on allegations of three counts of indecent assault and battery on a person over 14, one count of assault to rape, and three counts of breaking and entering in the nighttime for felony, according to thebostonhockeyblog.com. The piece by B.D. Gallof may have slipped through the cracks in the wake of the news of former Islanders GM Mike Milbury's arrest, though it was linked in Yahoo Puck Daddy headlines and by other hockey blogs.
There are significant pieces of the article that need to be examined: The public outing of Trivino's mother's sexual orientation, the airing of his family business, his father's ethnicity and grip of the English language and the stretch for corroboration between any of those so-called "demons" on Trivino's struggles at Boston University ... especially when many describe -- on record -- the actions of the previously "calm, polite, mild-mannered" young man as "out of character" from what they knew of him prior to his joining BU.
From CBS/WFAN:
Meanwhile, Trivino, mild-mannered and kind as described, also had his own personal demons. He had a broken home with an Argentinean father who at the time of the divorce barely spoke English. His mother was now living with another woman raising him.
What makes this home broken exactly? Is it the divorce, or the ethnicity and sexual orientation of the parents? Having an Argentinian father doesn't sound so bad...are they worse than other fathers? If his father was Argentinian, doesn't that make Trivino um Argentinian? Does Trivino not speak Spanish? Has he never throughout his lifetime communicated with his father? Was there abuse? Was there no love? Is there a problem with two women raising a child together? (More on that last question in a moment.)
What inference do you want readers to make here, CBS?
What is particularly galling in this case is that the traits of Trivino's family members are described as "personal demons." No mention of any abuse, financial or emotional instability or other parental failings, none.
Perhaps they weren't considered "personal demons" at all by Trivino...it certainly didn't seem like it in this Trivino interview from January 2008, as accessed at www.islesinfo.com [emphasis mine]:
NHL prospect loves Argentine soccer, playing net
10 minutes with Corey Trivino
by Jim Mason, yorkregion.com, January 25, 2008Q: What about your family?
Trivino: My dad emigrated from Argentina in 1978. He wanted me to play soccer... When I was 13 or 14 I focused on hockey so I think I broke his heart, but overall he's proud of me. My mom and dad are divorced but he lives across the street from me... It's a really great environment (going back and forth)...they have a good relationship...
That's what we have from the kid himself as he embarked on his college career. But rather than continue the insinuations, CBS/WFAN chose to back out and follow the "broken home/divorce/Argentinian/mother lives with a woman" paragraph with:
Whether this had any effect on the young man might be arguable in the present day of political correctness. However, for scouts, it was something that did weigh in on their estimates for the 2008 NHL Entry Draft.
Right. From "personal demons" to "arguable effect" ... but only for reasons of political correctness, right? Good. Now let's blame someone else.
CBS/WFAN carefully let an "unnamed source" connect those dirty non-PC dots together for them. How convenient to let an unnamed person do the "I'm not a racist, but..." drill:
Some felt he slipped out of the 1st round due to questions on character issues. Some felt he was emotionally unstable.
Per one former NHL scout: "I guess the lack of a father figure didn't help. I'm no right-winger by any means, but it can't be easy for an elite male athlete to be raised by lesbians. It's just not the ‘normal' way of doing things. And in my opinion the kid can't help but be emotionally imbalanced and thus perhaps turning to substance abuse."
Well, that's great Mr. Unnamed "scout" with your vast background experience in psychology, sociology and all things Corey Trivino. Now isn't that just how a former scout would feel about it?
What did Corey Trivino think about it? Oh, that's right, nobody ever dare ask him to his face...only slam him behind his back after he's in no position to complain about it and he's already stained enough by this real scandal, so now it is not only acceptable to write, it may sound believable.
The fact that CBS/WFAN would even allow a source like this to spout off his opinion, anonymously, of how "normal" Trivino's home life was or was not based on the sexual orientation of his parents without corroborating statements by people who actually knew of how Trivino felt about the situation is baffling. Nope, not a right winger...just an idiot.
Almost as troubling, I draw your attention to the last sentence of the quoted paragraph. Is it odd that a former NHL scout would actually speak this way? "And thus perhaps turning to substance abuse"? Makes you wonder if that's paraphrased? If it's paraphrased, what else is? What was the actual question that led to this response? Did the guy just start talking and boom, out comes that paragraph? Is this an email interview, and if so what were the other questions?
The seriousness and tenuousness of the connection between "lesbians" ---> "emotionally unstable ... turning to substance abuse" demands more than this.
Context matters, more so when an article allows an anonymous former scout to say what no one has or perhaps will put their name to. So what is the context here?
Allowing someone to anonymously trot out "raised by lesbians" isn't just offensive -- forget the "raised by wolves" parallel and imagine if it said instead "by black parents," "by gays" or even "by Argentinians" -- it's also, well, again, what exactly is the supposed impact here?
The "some" that feel like he fell out of the first round (not far mind you, he went 2nd round, 36th overall) may need only to look at the scouting reports on Trivino to find other reasons than the emotional instability elite athletes contract being reared by lesbians. To wit:
From THN:
"He's pretty weak physically," another scout cautioned.
From CSS:
He needs to get stronger - he's willing to battle, but isn't always winning the puck.
From McKeens:
...has all the tools to be a player, however his weight is a serious concern .. while it is not inconceivable for him to add some weight, some NHL teams might be scared off, as many prospects weigh more than his listed 160 pounds .. because of his slender frame, he does get pushed around in the slot but to his defense, he comes back, often eluding coverage much like Mike Bossy did in his NHL career...
The article just reeks of sensationalism under the facade of "inside report" when introducing "raised by lesbians" into the discussion. It might be more credible with information about Corey Trivino's response to his parent's divorce at all (e.g. he took it hard, he blamed his ___, he really didn't get to see ___ any more, his grades started to suffer, he began drinking more, etc.). Then one might think that we're genuinely getting into pertinent issues related to the divorce. But since there are multiple paragraphs on his mother's sexuality and little connecting Trivino's behavior to that event, it comes off like a stretch.
A former BU player, who did not want to be named, said of the family dynamic: "Yeah, I heard of that as well. It was something he pretty much kept to himself and perhaps some close friends. It's not like something you announce to the team or anything."
Absolutely...because it really wasn't anyone's business. Generally, most people will limit their most intimate details to their friends and family...not "a former BU player" (note ... was this former player a former BU teammate of Trivino's?). There are people you work with every day that you keep secrets from (whether they need to be secrets or not). Who wants to have to deal with the ignorance and scandalthirst that so many want to satiate at the expense of others?
Things like this get spread, ridiculed and scorned constantly...at some point, it's not embarrassing or shameful to the person. What becomes annoying and shameful and tired is having to deal with that level of intellect that whispers, under the protection of anonymity, "raised by lesbians."
Regardless of how the family situation affected Trivino, clearly there is an issue of living a bit too large in Boston post-2009.
Was Trivino unstable emotionally, leaving it bottled up until there was a bottle involved? Or was there an atmosphere of excess for someone away from home, an issue that impacts many who go to college and many who live the "college jock" life? An issue that has gotten others kicked off the BU team before Trivino?
Indeed, indeed ... if these "demons" of divorced parents (shock!), Argentinian father (horror!), and gay mother (outrage!) affected him at all, it appears to be an unknown. And a case of running with titillating supposition from an unnamed source. Could've just been a case of "college kid can't handle being away at school" or random criminal/tragic story. Thank goodness you've publicly outed his mother though; that should get them talking.
What happened here is a tragedy. The biggest tragedy is the victim and how she was and will be affected going forward should these allegations be proven true. This is not an attempt to distract from the seriousness of the allegations and pattern of behavior at hand. Corey Trivino deserves punishment commensurate to his level of guilt on all charges. He also deserves to get help if he truly has an alcohol problem. But he should have been identified and mandated much earlier than now since he was obviously drinking heavily while he was under age.
There are myriad failings across the board here from Trivino, the coaching staff, BU, his teammates, and others who turned a blind eye to the shenanigans. Likewise, alcohol abuse can stem from myriad factors. Those other failings are raised in the article. But to further pull Trivino's family apart and create a narrative that may not exist (in Trivino's world or any world), and has no context beyond unnamed former scout, reads as an attempt not for context, but for shock journalism.
Thanks to Dominik, Mike and Mark for help with research, editing, guidance and playing within the team concept!
67 comments
|
Add comment
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Having an absent parent does suck for anyone who has to deal with it.
But thats about that on that front, as far as Im concerned.
What happened here is a tragedy. The biggest tragedy is the victim and how she was and will be affected going forward.
If what she reported is indeed true, definitely.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
True
I will edit to alleged victim. But I think the big point of “having an absent parent” is that Trivino himself said that his parent lived across the street from one another and maintained a great relationship post-divorce. What the article mentioned spoke about “the time of the divorce” which was clearly, earlier than his father living across the street.
NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
Things like that can still hurt years later, but its good that his parents both made efforts to make things as good as possible.
This whole situation is just a damn shame. People can just have problems- there is often nobody to ‘blame’ for their poor choices but the person him or herself. From what (admittedly little) I know, thats what this seems like to me.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Dec 18, 2011 6:38 PM EST up reply actions
as we all know... all children of 2 heterosexuals living together who both speak perfect english...
grow up with no problems
by Khan Noonien Singh on Dec 18, 2011 6:36 PM EST reply actions 4 recs
Demons = alcohol & fame of 2009 win
As a note, I knew Trivino’s upbringing since he was selected in 2008 draft, but deemed it not appropriate to write about. However, when I wrote the piece which was to address to fill in how that happened to such a good well-meaning kid, I was not sure if I would include it.
The piece was about what I feel is the swirling issues of BU’s 2009 win, the loss of most of their team leaders, and then the fact a scout (unemployed until it kicks into gear later this year…b/c for some that is how it works) had confirmed what was felt emotional instability. This addressed childhood divorce, even if he moved down the street later on…and also home situation.
I agonized on whether to include it still… b/c despite it being just one element… it would be focused on.. but when the Boston papers kept citing: family problems and family issues, I felt it needed to be included. It was sourced twice, and corroborated by former BU player.
Sadly, it will be misconstrued by a fanbase that is self-protective over understanding what is news and what is appropriate. I fielded the piece to several professionals before sending it on to CBS.
The piece was to try to find out why Corey Trivino was in a spin-out for more than just this situation, but for well-over a season….something lost in the reaction, I think. My only regret is that I did not concentrate enough on his injury woes as well to give it all faceted sides.
However, what is concerning is how people think demons are ethnicity or orientation. I think this is pure political correct poppycock and far too much fan orientation. My attempt was to fill in as many blanks as possible as I could.
The fact that Corey Trivino has now deleted his posts on the wall of those females he also knocked on the door of before ending up at the victims is far more of concern than a bunch of Isles fans who cannot differentiate that when someone commits a crime, if someone is doing an investigative piece to ask the why and how..you go where you can to find anything that can add to the fabric, personal or not. Sorry if that bothers those waving the fan pom poms.
I genuinely appreciate you adding more here, BD.
I will just say it seems to me personally that peoples issues with this are not a result of any kind of pom-pom waving. The way it looks to me, they are more questioning the relevance of your source’s comments regarding CTs mom and her SO affecting him negatively to a piece like this.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Dec 18, 2011 9:46 PM EST up reply actions
Correct
“Personal demons” followed directly by ethnicity, divorce, orientation was what raised my eyebrow, especially after the anon scout was allowed to basically air that of course a kid in that situation can’t help but be emotionally unstable and/or abuse substances — esp. when others are on record describing him differently back home.
Use of anon sources is always a hot-button issue in journalism, and in this instance it’s what took the piece from this kid has an alcohol problem (documented from many places) to this kid’s issues stem from the three above-mentioned areas (per theory of anonymous scout who apparently thinks a strong male in the home is essential). On one level I feel comfortable saying any alcoholic’s issues stem from other influencing factors; on another level I would not feel comfortable letting that scout use those peripheral issues to make that case.
No pom-poms. None needed. No need for PC, even. Different issue.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.
by Dominik on Dec 18, 2011 10:11 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Like hell, Gallof
You were so concerned and agonized over it, and went ahead… but you didn’t include any easily-confirmable facts than any of us could find in ten minutes. You left the impression that Dad vanished and that Mom and ladyfriend maybe messed with Corey Trivino’s head, with said problems not manifesting until he went off to college. All you had to do was dig a little bit more.
Besides this, it chaps my hide that you think Isles fans are the ones with the problems about “political correctness.” The problem we have is that you implied a certain thing that insulted some folks without presenting a second side to things. You could not be bothered to finish your investigation once you had a theory that was fat and juicy, and you ran with it. When you were called on this as somewhat shoddy and unprofessional, then you threw on your “just a blogger!” hat. And here you say
“you go where you can to find anything that can add to the fabric” of your story, but that obviously didn’t include things that our moderators found in ten minutes’ worth of clicking.
Now, on top of this you’ve had the incredible bad grace to blame US for your craptitude, and imply that we’re the ones with blinkers because Trivino was a Isles draftee. Apparently you haven’t bothered to research any of that, either. There was a whole thread of it. The general trend was that our readers were greatly concerned about the lady in the matter, and not so much for Trivino. If he’s guilty he will be punished fittingly and good riddance.
We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog
by mikb on Dec 18, 2011 9:49 PM EST up reply actions 5 recs
Amen brother. I couldn’t have said it better myself.
Formerly a part time contributor and pittier of fools, now an Emeritus at Lighthouse Hockey.
by David Hanssen on Dec 19, 2011 12:07 AM EST up reply actions
Really?
Meanwhile, Trivino, mild-mannered and kind as described, also had his own personal demons. He had a broken home with an Argentinean father who at the time of the divorce barely spoke English. His mother was now living with another woman raising him.
The reason why “people think demons are ethnicity or orientation” is because your article seems to suggest as much. And to blame it on PC-ness or fan protective-ness is unfair. I for one never thought much about the guy as he is on no one’s list of top Isles’ prospects yet I found the reference — without any citation to anything suggesting why these considerations might be relevant — to be jarring.
Lighthouse Hockey. Where Islanders fans come to panic with punctuation.
by DP'sknee(andhipandflubugandotherknee) on Dec 18, 2011 9:52 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Exactly
If the demons are alcohol and the 2009 victory, then a sentence outlining those two things should have followed, not one about his parental situation.
I have a hard time believing that wasn’t specifically trying to be insinuated in that graf, because there is no other way to read it.
Adding to the fabric vs creating it
If the family situation was in fact, a factor, it should have been corroborated by someone with knowledge of the situation and Trivino’s stance on them. The simple fact is, you don’t know what kind of impact that had, but are using a confirmation bias because his behavior implied some sort of emotional instability. You went looking for a reason for his behavior, and due to your personal biases, found what you thought could be a catalyst and ran with it.
Regardless of whether the “professionals” approved it prior to CBS is irrelevant. Without context, they may have missed it too…especially if they trust your judgement on the accuracy of both the conditions and their impact.
For example, if you had a quote from the coach that had said, “Corey took his parents divorce hard and never came to grips with his mother’s sexual orientation”, that would be something. What you did here, was the opposite it appears. You had the situation in mind, then asked questions about the situation…and someone gave their opinion on how he thinks a person would react in Trivino’s situation.
Your continued rationalizations that this is more about people not being able to deal with your edgy approach, being too PC and their own fandom leads me to believe that you aren’t even aware of how to approach stories like this in an insightful manner…but I can see how that becomes an easier out for you then doing some introspection regarding this piece.
It’s possible that the reason that you’re not getting more backlash on this is simply because the Trivino family has obviously greater problems right now and you picked an easier to pick on target group. I ask you to forward your story to any homosexual or other minority groups to see if this bothers them…but remember to tell them that none of those things have been confirmed as effecting Trivino.
NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Dec 18, 2011 10:18 PM EST up reply actions 6 recs
I think this is just about the most unprofessional actions I've seen in a long time by a scribe/journalist, grow up Gallof
As a life long Isles fan and a father with a daughter myself, I think you comments are childish and stupid. You act highly unprofessional targeting fans, who in my opinion raised legit points. No one deserves to be raped, or sexually assaulted…ppl want the truth, and of course, millions of kids go through parental divorce, don’t wind up axe murderers, etc. I don’t claim to understand or relate to gay marriages or relationships…as a Catholic it isn’t something I was originally comfortable with, but then again, love between two ppl, regardless of gender, certainly can’t be a negative thing and certainly the churches have no right to claim they own the morality throne…
fact is, you jumped to sweeping generalizations as if you were some kind of expert. That Trivino has problems is obvious. I don’t know whether he would have committed a full blown rape because he did not do that based on the fact that that was not alleged, but the assault (sexual and physical) and the alcoholism is alleged. Trivino is not the first, Fogerty, Sanderson, Kordic…this list is long. This kid obviously needs help, and it may take a court order and some time served to get it.
But to insult Isles fans, essentially calling them biased homers, the truth is you are merely scapegoating Isles fans for your own yellow journalism which also borders on homo-phobia among other things. The truth is the vast majority of Isles fans had already written Trivino off as a guy who was a complete bust as a prospect…he didn’t even crack the teams’ top 25 under 25 list…and not one single fan disagreed. That Trivino showed some signs of life this year was welcomed, but still every Isles fan saw that as raising trade potential, as he clearly was way down the depth list and would never have been a regular player.
by CanadianIsleslifer on Dec 19, 2011 6:36 AM EST up reply actions
This says it all, Mr. Gallof
You say:
“…is far more of concern than a bunch of Isles fans who cannot differentiate that when someone commits a crime, if someone is doing an investigative piece to ask the why and how…”
You see, Mr. Gallof, Trevino has not committed a crime…at least not yet, anyway. He has been alleged to. And that makes all the difference when you pretend to be a professional journalist doing an ‘investigative piece.’ You did not investigate anything…you just tried haphazardly to connect dots that may have no relationship at all. And lets face it, you will never be able to prove those connections anyway. These are just psychological conjectures on your part. You just aired your thoughts, and Trevino’s private family matters, for all to see. And all for what at this point is an alleged crime.
Its an opinion piece, and certainly not investigative journalism. Nice try.
by JackandAce on Dec 19, 2011 10:13 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
This article is pretty bad...
I am not a writer, and I imagine it is very difficult to do so. However, I thought responsible journalism was about gathering facts, and then checking those facts. That does not seem to be done here.
In his own defense, Mr. Gallof claims he is only a blogger. I think this defense is irresponsible, because it says that bloggers can be irresponsible. This would make them less like journalists. This is why journalists and teams look down on bloggers. It’s very unfair to use that defense.
Also, again, you need to check facts. Everything in Mr. Gallof’s article is pure, 100% speculation. That is unacceptable with journalism. You need to check facts, and name names, not “sources who wish to stay anonymous.” That’s weak.
Finally – don’t come here and blame Islander fans for waving pom-poms. Corey Trevino is a good young prospect, but, more importantly, a young man that may have issues and need help. He definitely did something that a vast majority of us on this blog have said is reprehensible. I think the more important thing in this case is finding out what really happened (not speculating), and trying to find a way to help this young man.
I think the Isles should stand behind him, find the facts, and get him any help, if necessary.
Understood
But truly the article isn’t 100% speculation at all — there’s a lot of sourced stuff there, especially for someone coming to the Trivino story for the first time. It’s just the biggest claim or news hook (if you grant that the alcohol issues are old news) is the anonymous scout’s theory on better living through a Leave it to Beaver home.
Again, a lot of that comes back to when anonymous is acceptable; the standard I know of is “only when the info is essential to the story and you’ve exhausted all other avenues to get that info for attribution.” I don’t see this scout’s theory about what happens when a kid lives under the home of two women as meeting that standard. And again, that doesn’t require PC-ing the issue; rather, having someone who actually saw the family dynamics at work (a coach, perhaps?).
But I agree the blog vs. article distinction does a disservice to the stated investigative goal.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.
It May Be Overstated, Dom
I read many drafts of that piece before the final one that was sent to CBS, and like I said I filled in a lot of the BU holes since I still follow the team. I don’t think the piece meant to suggest Trivino’s home life was the biggest source of his problems. B.D. devoted a lot more space to Trivino’s history of alcohol abuse and the effect that winning the 09 championship had on BU’s leadership structure and those left behind (somewhere, Kieran Millan still thinks he won that championship himself….he’s never recovered). We’re looking at, in many ways, a perfect storm with this kid, and trying to fill in the blanks seems like the natural thing to do.
by Nick (LetThereBeLighthouse) on Dec 19, 2011 1:52 AM EST up reply actions
Nick
The blanks were filled in with the opinion of a former scout on how he thinks a person would react given the circumstances. Again, I could appreciate trying to fill in the blanks if something substantive arose from that examination, but nothing did, and the parents personal life was exploited anyway.
Really, I get that other angles were highlighted, but none of those other angles were described as Trivino’s “personal demons”. And again, what does being Argentinian have to do with anything? What about not speaking English? It’s obvious that they communicated somehow, so how are these two things relevant other than to try to portray the home as more “broken” than it was.
Maybe it was just written or edited poorly.
I’m not privy to the extended explanations you may have gotten, but to me (and the rest of us), it read like an unsubstantiated shock job. It looked like it tried to connect Trivino’s current behavior to an emotional disturbance caused by his personal demons of his mothers homosexuality and his fathers inability to speak the language.
Again, I’d have no problem if these things were true, but were putting the cart before the horse here. It’s like that South Park episode where Cartman takes over the morning announcements. “I’m just asking questions here…”
NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey
by Keith Quinn on Dec 19, 2011 2:25 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Agree with Keith
I have cousins in Quebec, where one parent is French the other English, and the French father can not speak English at all. All four kids turned out fine. They communicate and speak to each parent in both languages without any problem. Even when we visit it is fine, my cousins act as interpreters. If Trivino’s problems were “caused” by this and his mother’s sexual orientation, I dare say Trivino is part of the same species as the rest of us and we would be dealing with thousands of north American kids acting out the same way as a result. That clearly has not happened.
Tell me there was abuse in the home, etc., and yes, there is a mountain of conclusive evidence that tells us this does lead to dysfunctional behaviour and substance abuse. But if some idiot tells me it is b/c his parents got divorced, his dad doesn’t speak English and his mom is gay, I am smart enough to know i am interviewing someone who doesn’t have a clue what they are talking about and i would know enough not to print idle gossip…if anything, B.D. should have interviewed experts in the area if he wanted to explore is personal beliefs that these things may have been the cause.
by CanadianIsleslifer on Dec 19, 2011 6:48 AM EST up reply actions
He definitely did something that a vast majority of us on this blog have said is reprehensible.
Im a little confused by this sentence in light of what immediately follows it. If by this you are referring to him refusing help for his apparent alcohol problems, I would say that is disappointing and sad, not reprehensible. But if by this you are referring to the charges against him, I question saying that he “definitely did” what he is accused of doing. We simply do not know that at this moment, and to presume that we do (to the point of saying what he ‘definitely’ did) would be wrong.
I think the more important thing in this case is finding out what really happened (not speculating), and trying to find a way to help this young man.
I agree with that- and I would think that the woman pressing the charges needs help as well- either way.
I think the Isles should stand behind him, find the facts, and get him any help, if necessary.
Im not sure about that. I would certainly not object to it if they decide to, but Im just not sure they ‘should’ if the words is used as in saying it is what they are obliged to do or what they owe him. When a player is drafted, it is an honor. Getting a scholarship to a college is an honor. Playing on a team is an honor. If anything, perhaps HE is the one who should feel obliged to make things right.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Dec 18, 2011 10:35 PM EST up reply actions
Well researched and baanced reporting.
Only two resultuions that I am as plausible. Charges dropped;seriously reduced and he ends at up Bridgepotrt this season. Looks like he is a stud with megga upside. Of course charges stick and it is years until we see him agaim. Worth watching to be certain.
"The Long Island Electric Company will come full voltage again".
by HeyGoalieGoalieDave on Dec 19, 2011 1:22 AM EST reply actions
As Someone B.D. Consulted On This Piece....
I think I should add my 2 cents.
As many people know, especially those who follow me on Twitter, I’m a BU alum, I still watch BU hockey as often as I can, and I provided a lot of the BU context contained in the piece, mostly by pointing him to BU sources that could back up my statements. Anything that isn’t well-known to anyone who follows BU is not a leap in logic. It’s true that BU won the NCAA championship in 2009, with Trivino centering a freshman line with current captain Chris Connolly and Vinny Saponari, one of the players dismissed from the team last year. The 09 team was special, with Matt Gilroy (a fellow North Bellmore boy….I actually knew his deceased brother, Timmy) a coach’s dream for captain. That team policed itself, and after the championship BU lost Gilroy and Brandon Yip (graduation), Colin Wilson (signed with Nashville), and captain-in-waiting Brian Strait (signed with the Penguins). This left Kevin Shattenkirk alone to handle a depleted team spoiled by winning a national championship…..and I genuinely wonder if Jack Parker got so used to his team being self-policing that he let problems fester longer than they should have. Shattenkirk, Nick Bonino, and Colby Cohen left school early after 2010, leaving another massive vacuum from which the team has only begun to recover.
I think it’s completely above the board to discuss the issues around the BU team itself in light of a kid who clearly has a drinking problem. While I disagreed with B.D. at the time that the home angle was a big deal (largely for a personal reason I’d rather not broadcast on this blog, as much as I love you guys), and B.D. would back me up on that, I conceded his point that it was a small part of a larger puzzle.
Regardless of the factors, I don’t think B.D. was out of line in trying to go deeper than the surface. Trivino is clearly a nice kid who has a drinking problem and, according to Jack Parker, has refused treatment in the past. Given his history, this is an undisputed fact, and I don’t think B.D. was out of line to ask a logical follow-up question: since Corey Trivino didn’t get arrested last week in a vacuum, what factors could have led to his drinking problem getting him in such trouble?
At the end of the day, this hurts me more from my BU fan side than it does my Isles fan side, because I’m not so blinded by scarlet and white to think Trivino was a lock to ever wear an Isles jersey, but his absence will be sorely felt at Agganis, especially now that Charlie Coyle failed out and is headed to the QMJHL. You can disagree with some of the inferences made by SOURCES in the piece, not by B.D. himself, as I on occasion do, but it’s not out of line to ask these questions.
Above all else, rather than hang B.D. for what he wrote, I’d like to send my sincere wishes that the alleged victim can find peace in her life and that Corey Trivino finally admits he has a drinking problem and needs help. His smartest course of action would be to voluntarily enter rehab before the trial, but if this incident doesn’t make him realize he has a problem, nothing will.
by Nick (LetThereBeLighthouse) on Dec 19, 2011 1:46 AM EST reply actions 2 recs
On a funny note....
Kenn Elmore, BU Dean of Students, is a personal friend of mine….you have no idea how odd it was to hear him talking to Botta. As George Costanza would say, WORLDS WERE COLLIDING!
by Nick (LetThereBeLighthouse) on Dec 19, 2011 1:47 AM EST up reply actions
Regardless of the factors, I don’t think B.D. was out of line in trying to go deeper than the surface. Trivino is clearly a nice kid who has a drinking problem and, according to Jack Parker, has refused treatment in the past.
Here’s the thing though Nick, it took me 5-10 minutes tops to find interviews with Trivino in which he talks about his home life and his dad living across the street from him. About how his dad was a little sad when he decided to take up Hockey fill time instead of soccer at the age of 12.
I actually spent more time trying to pin down where Trivino was predicted to go in the draft, and it was very hard to find any sort of “character” issue with Trivino leading up to the draft. Be it his upbringing or anything else that might have foreshadowed this. Instead it was his size and strength that were brought up.
I don’t think anyone would argue with what is written in the original article about BU itself, but it’s the sensationalism that’s added in which we’re taking offense to.
"I really wouldn’t wish rooting for both the Isles and Blues on anyone." Dominik
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
by Mark D on Dec 19, 2011 2:11 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
You Never Know With Scouts.....
The ESPN mock draft had him going around 20th overall if I remember properly, and you never know what exactly made the kid fall. Could’ve been that he played Junior-A, could’ve been that he’d be in school at least 3 years, could’ve been like the scene in Moneyball where the scout tries to dismiss a player because “he has an ugly girlfriend.”
by Nick (LetThereBeLighthouse) on Dec 19, 2011 7:57 AM EST up reply actions
And as I said in my reply to Dom....
Maybe the fact that I spent so much time going over the BU context made me pay more attention to that internally….B.D. can tell you that I didn’t agree with him that it was an earth-shattering deal when he mentioned it to me, but I was concentrating on the BU angle when looking at this.
by Nick (LetThereBeLighthouse) on Dec 19, 2011 7:58 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks for weighing in with your perspective
I sincerely do find this process interesting (by “process” I mean how people compose it, review it, react to it, critique it). Particularly so because everyone is bringing different grievances and their own personal experiences to the table. (I can check off a few superficial parallels in my own life with Trivino’s. Alas, not an elite male athlete and my mother only brought men into the home, whew!)
I agree it’s not out of line at all to dig deeper; and I know how frustratingly resource-expending investigative stuff is for often very little payoff (not that I bother to do it in my hockey writing). But I also know some tantalizing stuff has to be left on the cutting room floor because it’s not firmed up or maybe even just people talking.
I have to admit, as someone not very interested in college hockey and not seeing Trivino as much of a prospect (in part due to existing issues), it was tying those three variables to demons, carried by the proxy of this scout’s speculation, that raised my own eyebrow. That there is so much obviously and documented there regarding the alcohol abuse and discipline issues at BU, that made me wonder all the more about the inclusion of the home life speculation.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.
And I'll 100% Concede That
As a BU fan I very easily could’ve approached it from that angle and given more internal emphasis on the “BU won in 09 and everyone ran for NHL contracts as soon as they could” angle, because I’ve known for years that it’s a problem for the school.
by Nick (LetThereBeLighthouse) on Dec 19, 2011 7:55 AM EST up reply actions
I can speak to what Dominik claims
I also know some tantalizing stuff has to be left on the cutting room floor because it’s not firmed up or maybe even just people talking.
I’m currently writing a book about the 1980s comic book industry and the amount of testimony I’m cutting out is tremendous. I am choosing to omit it for the very reasons Dominik states: either I can’t confirm the testimony through other sources OR it’s obvious to me what I’m being told is ax grinding (and people are feeding me misinformation solely to perpetuate grudges now almost 30 years old).
What I find troubling is the manner in which Gallof supports the claim that “Some felt [Corey Trivino] slipped out of the 1st round due to questions on character issues. Some felt he was emotionally unstable.” The ONLY evidence Gallof provides to support that claim is an anonymous NHL scout who is evidently ignorant of Trivino’s true home circumstances: "I guess the lack of a father figure didn’t help." As Keith Quinn shows, there WASN’T any lack of a father figure. Trivino’s father lived across the street and they remained in constant (daily?) contact.
Like others here, I don’t have a problem with Gallof raising the matter of Trivino’s upbringing (especially since he claims the Boston media has harped on it). However, the subject needed to be framed better and supported better. The testimony of this anonymous former NHL scout did nothing but provide unwarranted (and illogical) speculation.
Comic Book Writer by day; Islanders fanatic by Gameday
by Captdallas on Dec 19, 2011 8:19 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Playing devil's advocate
As Keith Quinn shows, there WASN’T any lack of a father figure. Trivino’s father lived across the street and they remained in constant (daily?) contact.
Trivino has/had a vested interest in publicly portraying a great home life. If he’s being quoted or is being asked questions – whether by a reporter or scout or whatever – he might give a more-sunnier-than-real picture of the various aspects of his home life.
But now I am speculating about others’ speculation. To be honest, I generally agree with the sentiment here – I have a hard time making the leap from anonymous quotes citing anecdotal evidence to explain motives of alleged crimes or patterns of behavior. The anonymous scout is doing as much armchair psychology as everyone involved in this thread — which is fine in the comments section of a blog, but inappropriate in a piece of investigative journalism.
Success was survival and, kid, it still is
by IslesFanInNJ on Dec 19, 2011 10:32 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I should qualify
Not inappropriate, per se, but given the amount of evidence and anecdotal nature of it, in this context it is inappropriate.
Success was survival and, kid, it still is
by IslesFanInNJ on Dec 19, 2011 10:34 AM EST up reply actions
Trivino has/had a vested interest in publicly portraying a great home life. If he’s being quoted or is being asked questions – whether by a reporter or scout or whatever – he might give a more-sunnier-than-real picture of the various aspects of his home life.
This is a good point. This kind of denial and sunny picture painting also fits with Trivinos IPB interview from May of 2010 in which he says the previous incidents at BU were in no way alcohol related- even though we know from his coach directly saying so recently that is not true.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Dec 19, 2011 11:17 AM EST up reply actions
I think it may be a stretch to say that Trivino had an incentive to paint a sunny picture of the previous alcohol-related incidents...
so he has the same incentive to publicly paint a sunny picture of a great home life. As much as it was IslesFaninNJ playing devil’s advocate, it begs the question rather than deduces from the facts. The kid might have had an incentive, but we can’t know that from his denials in his IPB interview.
I’m not accusing either of you of arguing as such, but want to post this as a caution to drawing false conclusions.
Can one be an atheist toward a hockey team? That means I have NO faith anymore.
by Turgeon1992 on Dec 19, 2011 12:29 PM EST up reply actions
There is a big difference in saying “he might give a sunnier approach, heres an example of when he did so” and “That is definitely the explanation, no question, since he did it once before regarding a different topic, theres your explanation right there”.
I would simply like to point out that I did not draw ANY conclusions, let alone a false one.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Dec 19, 2011 12:58 PM EST up reply actions
He could also just be in a state of denial.... No incentive at all. The power of denial, is well, powerful.
I guess my point is, he simply might have been painting a prettier picture of his home life because he truly didn’t see any problems….or at least much of a problem. Hard to say what motives there were…if there was a motive even. Some people really do have amazing abilities to compartmentalize things…..and to do so can be a good thing or a bad thing……more often bad IMO.
Agreed
It could be any number of things and of course it takes something else for someone to come out and say, “Actually, my home life sucks*.” So we don’t know, don’t ever know, but that’s the trouble with finding out. With that out there, you need more of an authority than the anon scout spec to say these are the issues. But CBS argues that in light of the serious charges, those comments are relevant.
*I of course expect most teenagers to say that, actually.
Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.
He could be in a state of denial.
But given what seems known (the quotes about his dad living down the block, etc.), accusing him of being in such a state or entertaining the idea that he is such a state presumes a conclusion that we are unable to prove. That is what I want to be cautious of when discussing whether this kid is or is not in denial or painting an untrue picture, etc.
You’re right that we need more information than an anonymous ex-scout who proves wonderful speculation on what might be underlying causes.
Can one be an atheist toward a hockey team? That means I have NO faith anymore.
exactly
If he wants the reader to make up his own mind, include the part about Trivino having time with his father, who lived on the same block as he and his Mom. Not hard to do. Let us think over whether or not he was in denial.
We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog
I'll agree with you if you agree with this:
A serial killer who comes from a good home, where the parents attended church, didn’t drink or do drugs, were not gay and gave him lots of love is part of the reason why said serial killer did what they did.
Rediculous isn’t it.
There are literally thouands of kids who parents get divorced, thousands more raised by gay parents, and thousands more whose parents immigrated to North America and either don’t speak the native tongue, or speak it so poorly they speak their indigenous tongue in the house. An intelligent person would do the math, drop the lame excuses and look for root cause answers. At least that is what will happen when Trivino finally gets counselling, and a large part of that will be his taking responsibility for his actions.
by CanadianIsleslifer on Dec 19, 2011 6:57 AM EST up reply actions
I'm Agreeing With You In My Post
As I said, my first response when B.D. said it was essentially “I know divorce damages you, but come on.” You’re choosing to emphasize that piece when you notice that I emphasized the leadership and coaching on the BU team to wonder why his drinking wasn’t checked beforehand.
by Nick (LetThereBeLighthouse) on Dec 19, 2011 7:53 AM EST up reply actions
crossing the line
There’s a fine line that BD’s piece crossed that could have been prevented by a bit more editing or digging. It’s perfectly legit to report that the family situation caused scouts to downgrade Corey’s status. BD’s piece had enough sources to support that point. And that point is both relevant to the piece and interesting in it’s own right: the things that scouts look at — rightly or wrongly — in trying to predict the unpredictable is a fascinating topic. What is not legitimate is asserting or suggesting in any way that the family situation constitutes “personal demons” without any further evidence. Calling it “asking questions” or “filling in the blanks” doesn’t detract from this central point. In particular, the “I’m only asking questions” trope is the favorite tool of conspiracy theorists and rumor mongers in the darkest corners of the internet and talk radio.
What I found particularly appalling is BD denying that his piece says what it says (personal demons = family situation) and attacking critics as homers for calling him out forr it.
One is tempted to frame this as a blogger v. Journalism (with a capital J) but that’s not it. This is not about writing style or citing unnamed sources or even rumors. – I wouldn’t have a problem if the unnamed scout said there was addiction or abuse in the home. But all there is is a connection drawn between family structure and demons without any support at all.
Lighthouse Hockey. Where Islanders fans come to panic with punctuation.
by DP'sknee(andhipandflubugandotherknee) on Dec 19, 2011 10:01 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Maybe I'm not reading it the same way....
and maybe my biases are coming through because I follow BU hockey and have been debating this practically since the day they won the championship in 09, but I didn’t read the piece the same way. I read it as largely talking about the situation in college as contributing to his problems…..I mean, look at what Jack Parker said to him, from Dom’s piece on 12/13:
“I told him then, ‘The good news is, I’m not going to do anything about that incident,’ which is minor compared to this one. ‘But here’s the bad news,’ I said. ‘Next time, I’m going to kick you off the team for good. And here’s the worst news, there will be another incident, Corey.’”
That, combined with what B.D. outlined about BU’s leadership vacuum, seems to be the largest contributing factor here, and my read was that B.D. presented it as such.
by Nick (LetThereBeLighthouse) on Dec 19, 2011 12:20 PM EST up reply actions
that is where the coach screwed up, and needs to man up
and admit that he, as the kids coach, failed, and failed the college community. the coach had the power then to tell trivino, kid, denial is not a river and egypt…i’m putting you into an alcohol treatment program, and you will stick with it or else your off the time…
it boggles the mind how in the world this coach could say geez wally, i’m not going to do anything this time cause i know you will screw up again and be off the team…
geez genius coach. i too can predict that someone with a substance abuse problem will fall again without help, but i wouldn’t do nothing when i had the power to intervene…one would expect the coach to care about his players as
ppl.
it also begs the question, what the hell are BU’s policies and why the hell is the coach allowed to fly by the seat of his pants, arbitrarly making up policy as he goes along????
by CanadianIsleslifer on Dec 19, 2011 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
We haven't disagreed on anything here
I completely agree, and that’s why I felt compelled to explain everything that happened at BU since Trivino’s freshman year, to give B.D. that context when writing his piece. You’re asking fair questions that many have asked previously, though most of Trivino’s other drunken mistakes don’t nearly rise to this level (go to YouTube and search for “Party Like a Puckstar.”
However, I think this is where we’re differing. I think the article strongly laid out the leadership vacuum at BU as a large contributing factor….hell, Matt Gilroy would’ve kicked his ass, and notice there are NO stories about Trivino from his freshman year (that I’ve found so far). However, nobody wakes up one day and decides to have a drinking problem; there are contributing factors. To bring up one person’s opinion of why that happened, after devoting far more space in the article to the BU problem, didn’t strike me as out of bounds.
by Nick (LetThereBeLighthouse) on Dec 19, 2011 12:42 PM EST up reply actions
If that was true
Then why include anything of his family life to begin with. Trivino’s family life had nothing to do with a BU leadership vacuum or his situation in college, unless you or Gallof can outline how his personal life influenced his interactions in college, but even in the Gallof piece itself he said that not many, besides close friends knew much about his personal life.
by IDCWhoYouLike on Dec 19, 2011 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
I DIdn't Write The Article
I provided the BU context – you’re asking the wrong person.
by Nick (LetThereBeLighthouse) on Dec 19, 2011 12:35 PM EST up reply actions
Nick
what is BU’s policies on alcohol/subtance abuse and protocol when it is discovered a player has a problem?
by CanadianIsleslifer on Dec 19, 2011 12:37 PM EST up reply actions
Depends on a lot of things
Are you of legal age, is it a day where the coaching staff clears the players to drink, have you engaged in anything illegal…..unfortunately, like all colleges, the rules aren’t necessarily enforced equally. Do I know the whole story? No….I was a student there and I’m friendly with a few people in the administration, but Parker has a lot of autonomy given his prestige in the school. I personally think it’s unconscionable that he clearly knew Trivino’s drinking was out of control and chose to do nothing before Trivino did something truly horrible. Full kudos to the school for immediately doing the right thing and not sweeping it under the rug, but it never should have come to this.
by Nick (LetThereBeLighthouse) on Dec 19, 2011 12:45 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
True
But the question needs to be asked and you seem to be responding, which i do appreciate, it was more a rhetorical question anyway.
by IDCWhoYouLike on Dec 19, 2011 12:39 PM EST up reply actions
Strike that
You have stated that you had something to do with the overall process of this article being submitted. You have also maintained that bringing Trivino’s personal life into the article was not out of bounds. My question was put forth because of those factors. If the story is really about, in your eyes, the leadership vacuum and his situation in college then what purpose does bringing up his personal life and his family dynamic serve? There’s no evidence to suggest that it led to his incidents with alcohol, nor his relationship with the people around him. In my eyes his personal life is a non-factor. Especially when even in your own words “…and notice there are NO stories about Trivino from his freshman year (that I’ve found so far).”
by IDCWhoYouLike on Dec 19, 2011 1:13 PM EST up reply actions
While there is a lot of BU focus in the article, the home life “problems” are framed as major issues that may have caused trivino’s recent behavior. Regardless of whether that was not the intention, that was the outcome. That is a huge difficulty in writing; ensuring your audience reads your words as you exactly intend them. That is where this piece reeks of shoddy journalism.
Can one be an atheist toward a hockey team? That means I have NO faith anymore.
by Turgeon1992 on Dec 19, 2011 10:34 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Yeah, it's clearly more of a problem with how the article reads than anything.
I have no problem with the questions and the digging into Trivino’s home life (i.e. environment)…..especially since we are all products of our upbringing to a large degree….BUT, how the article is laid out reeks of today’s sensationalism that many have stated.
So the kid had a growing alcohol problem?
Are we pretty sure of this? It sure seems like it.
But don’t blame the alcohol. We wil blame the fact he grew up with lesbian parents in a home with an absentee father.
I grew up in a home where I heard from my dad twice from when I was 6 until I was 16. Twice. I’ve never had one woman complain about the way I’ve treated her (at least physically) and either has my brother who has been married for 20 years and is a partner in one of the biggest investment companies in the USA. Maybe it’s because our mom was just a single mom and not a lesbian.
Can’t really blame BD though. Our country acts like alcohol is all good, when in truth it might be the worst of all the drugs.
"We owe him a lot more than he owes us at this point. He's been stellar all year. He still gave us a chance to win this one, and we've got to find a way."
—C Josh Bailey, on G Al Montoya after a 5-3 loss Tuesday in Montreal.
by BobbyNystromOwnsYou on Dec 19, 2011 10:44 AM EST reply actions
Perhaps also because your father was not Argentinian?
;)
Can one be an atheist toward a hockey team? That means I have NO faith anymore.
by Turgeon1992 on Dec 19, 2011 12:31 PM EST up reply actions
I know saying this stuff is meant as joking
But I just dont find it funny, personally.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Dec 19, 2011 1:03 PM EST up reply actions
But like I said, I know youre joking. :(
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Dec 19, 2011 1:11 PM EST up reply actions
That's a fact. I am joking.
Can one be an atheist toward a hockey team? That means I have NO faith anymore.
I'm actually taking my mom to her first ever hockey game Friday night.
I was messing with her. I’m like mom, the Amerks are almost as old as you ,and you grew up in Rochester. And never went to see one game? Not one?
"We owe him a lot more than he owes us at this point. He's been stellar all year. He still gave us a chance to win this one, and we've got to find a way."
—C Josh Bailey, on G Al Montoya after a 5-3 loss Tuesday in Montreal.
by BobbyNystromOwnsYou on Dec 19, 2011 2:05 PM EST up reply actions
I'm totally cool with it. I didn't take it bad.
i’m pretty much over the fact my dad is a douche.
And it just makes me appreciate my mom that much more.
"We owe him a lot more than he owes us at this point. He's been stellar all year. He still gave us a chance to win this one, and we've got to find a way."
—C Josh Bailey, on G Al Montoya after a 5-3 loss Tuesday in Montreal.
by BobbyNystromOwnsYou on Dec 19, 2011 2:04 PM EST up reply actions
Or maybe you were just worried about the argentina thing
Either way, I didn’t read it as a big deal. But then again, I don’t get offended easily.
I’m an Archie Bunker fan, and Don Cherry fan.
"We owe him a lot more than he owes us at this point. He's been stellar all year. He still gave us a chance to win this one, and we've got to find a way."
—C Josh Bailey, on G Al Montoya after a 5-3 loss Tuesday in Montreal.
by BobbyNystromOwnsYou on Dec 19, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions
Now I'm getting an image of Don Cherry and Ron MacLean sitting at the piano....
“Boy the way Doug Gilmour played….hits that made the CBC late night tape….coaches like us we had it made….those were the days.”
Can one be an atheist toward a hockey team? That means I have NO faith anymore.
by Turgeon1992 on Dec 19, 2011 4:52 PM EST up reply actions 5 recs
HAHAHAHA
“And you knew who you werrrrrre thennnnnnnn…. Euros were Euros and men were men….. Mister, we could use a guy like Clarence Campbell again.”
We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog
by mikb on Dec 19, 2011 5:01 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
hahahahahaha
"We owe him a lot more than he owes us at this point. He's been stellar all year. He still gave us a chance to win this one, and we've got to find a way."
—C Josh Bailey, on G Al Montoya after a 5-3 loss Tuesday in Montreal.
by BobbyNystromOwnsYou on Dec 19, 2011 5:51 PM EST up reply actions
My personal reaction
Upon reading this piece I decided to do some looking myself at the situation and what occurred both in the BU dorms as well as the subsequent reaction. I also wanted to see how different news outlets handled the original alleged incident. I’m trying to be careful here, not for any PC reasons, but because all in all the whole situation is a mess.
Speaking first to the overall incident and how the news outlets handled things. I found many different stories, in that search I found three pieces of information that no one seemed to be able to agree upon. According to ESPN (specifically ESPN Boston): “The woman told him to leave and he did, according to the newspaper. She then called BU police, who arrived a short time later and put Trivino under arrest.” While the alleged incident is terrible, it seems like this particular story is attempting to make the incident appear to be no more than an understanding between two students at BU. However, the National Post has Trivino not leaving the room until campus police showed up. Leading the reader to believe that he had never left the room and continued the assault. Finally there was the original CBS story that placed Trivino in an elevator by the time that campus police arrested him, having left the room only after campus police had been phoned. Why draw attention to these three discrepancies? This speaks to the power words have, and how context can play a major role in how individual people view a story in general. The ESPN story makes the incident seem more innocuous than it is. While they put all the facts together and give you the bare bones of the story they can’t help but be an apologist for the athlete in question. The National Post, however, takes the allegation to another level, making it seem that Trivino had to be restrained by campus police before he left the room. The CBS story seems to bridge the gap.
Why is this important, and what does it have to do with Gallof’s article in question? Unsubstantiated claims, such as the ones made by Gallof in the name of an anonymous scout, can be damaging to the young man, the young man’s family and the overall situation. What Gallof saw in the original CBS story was a chance to exploit the situation in front of him. In the CBS post mentioned above was this sentence. "On Tuesday, Sullivan referred to unnamed “issues” Trivino has to deal with." Gallof seemed, at least to me, to run with this sentence and write a piece based solely on this one statement by Trivino’s attorney. However, I will draw to attention a couple of other sentences that I think Gallof could have tried to investigate. From the same CBS story, "Trivino’s attorney, William Sullivan, said there were “some inaccuracies” in the prosecution’s account of the incident, but he didn’t want to get into specifics." From Gallof’s own story, “Was there a dark side to winning with young contributors who then lose all that leadership almost immediately after? Did the coach let things lie far too long?” Finally, “Was Trivino unstable emotionally, leaving it bottled up until there was a bottle involved? Or was there an atmosphere of excess for someone away from home, an issue that impacts many who go to college?”
Attempting to investigate any of these questions, trying to find the answers to them would have spoken more to the “how and why” this alleged incident occurred. Putting together a pattern of behavior would have been a better use of the forum Gallof is afforded. However, these questions are largely left unanswered, and not just by Gallof who raised some of the questions to begin with, but also by the media at large.
The incident is regrettable, and I feel for the victim. If these allegations prove true I hope she gets the counseling and help she needs to deal with the incident. No matter how the case turns out, I hope Trivino gets the help he needs to deal with what seems to be a pattern of alcoholism.
correction
understanding in the second paragraph should have been misunderstanding.
by IDCWhoYouLike on Dec 19, 2011 12:48 PM EST up reply actions

by 































