Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: What If This Is It For The Celtics? End Of An Era Looming

Because of work I don't get to write much anymore but I thought most of us would find this interesting.

This makes sense and makes one wonder how long he has played with these symptoms.I keep hearing what a trooper Staios is but I saw a player constantly pinching and out of position. In the past few games his overplaying has cost us too many goals.

5 months ago Dsc_0146_tiny TheMagus 55 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Stai-away-os Steve Staios

CDH time! May we never look back.

Only God saves more than Montoya

by backstop87 on Dec 14, 2011 9:50 PM EST reply actions  

Id rather have Staios playing than Mottau or Eaton.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Dec 14, 2011 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Me too. Eaton has been a dissappointment so far, and Mottau...yea

Been waiting for this kid for a while though. CDH! CDH! CDH!

"Oh no. He's got some speed. I might have to take his legs out." Rick DiPietro shortly before the first stitch came out.

by backstop87 on Dec 14, 2011 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

What about Wishart

Why does he seem to get overlooked as a call-up lately?
I would think he would be the more logical and safer choice for the isles right now no?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Twitter: @mikeryaninc
"Past performance Is Not A Guarantee For Future Results"
"Listening is a Skill" -Jack Capuano

by FB4Real on Dec 14, 2011 10:14 PM EST reply actions  

He would have to clear waivers if he were sent back down

I would like to take credit for this brilliant piece of insight, but I read it in a previous post.

by CloseCallJiggs on Dec 14, 2011 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Is that the case

if they call him up on emergency basis?

by afrosupreme on Dec 15, 2011 5:47 AM EST up reply actions  

you would think but

since when do the islanders do logical?

by ripcurl2121 on Dec 14, 2011 10:58 PM EST up reply actions  

If he doesn’t stay with the team then the isles.risk losing him to waivers then people complain that we gave roloson away for nothing. That’s the logical thing.

Can one be an atheist toward a hockey team? That means I have NO faith anymore.

by Turgeon1992 on Dec 14, 2011 11:54 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I love Roli but he's showing his age

Down to .882 sv% and yanked in three of his last seven games. Since beating Pittsburgh on Nov 17, holds an unfathomable .829 sv% and 5.23 GAA. That we got Wishart from the deal looks rather like a steal if he even becomes a serviceable seventh.

Of course to do that, he kind of needs to be on the Islanders, not the Sound Tigers. I hope he gets the chance now.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Dec 15, 2011 12:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, technically we got him for nothing.

Its not like we traded for him, we gave him a contract as a FA.
And its not like we got nothing from him being here, he was a good Islander.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Dec 15, 2011 12:22 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

My point is that if Wishart comes up but doesn't stick, to go back to the AHL he must be exposed to waivers.

If he ends up on another team, then we have ultimately traded Roli for nothing since we would lose the player we got in the trade.

Can one be an atheist toward a hockey team? That means I have NO faith anymore.

by Turgeon1992 on Dec 15, 2011 2:23 AM EST up reply actions  

If he can't stick with this defense, what is the risk of losing him to waivers?

The logic is he isn’t good enough, but we certainly don’t want to lose him. I gues we can be patient for one more season, but pretty soon he’ll have missed his chance to contribute either way.

by Hockey1919 on Dec 15, 2011 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

I pray to god for Ness's health if he gets the call-up.

5’10’’ 170lbs could be really bad given our team’s injury issues and the huge bodies in the nhl. And no less, if we bring him up against the stars, one of the more physical teams in the nhl.

Hope for DeHaan anyway. He’s got the higher upside and should be nhl ready by now. But I worry how he’ll look and honestly think he was overdrafted and could very well be a dud given his ohl statistical progress over his career/size-strength so far/eye-test.

I do find this whole think really sad though, 2 of our starting top 4 d-man are now injured. FML. Great job bringing in depth on D garth! And Ioved the upgrade of Martinek/Hillen to Staios. Genius!

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Dec 15, 2011 1:35 AM EST reply actions  

Martinek's hurt again

and I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that Hillen wanted more then a 1 year deal by this point.

"I really wouldn’t wish rooting for both the Isles and Blues on anyone." Dominik
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Dec 15, 2011 9:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Who is better an injured Martinek or an Injured Staios?

We should have the Islanders injured reserve compete against the rest of the league to see who would come out on top. The Pens may not have the depth, but with Crosby they have a really strong IR.

by Hockey1919 on Dec 15, 2011 11:52 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

This sounds like a trick question

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Dec 15, 2011 8:30 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Whats the sound of one shoulder dislocating? Or a hamstring pulling... or a head concussing...

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Dec 15, 2011 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Just to throw another name out...

How about Matt Donovan? I haven’t watched any SoundTigers games so I can’t speak for overall performances, but Donovan, Wishart, De Haan, and Ness all have produced relatively the same statistics.

President of the "Don't Trade Travis Hamonic EVER!" Fan Club

by Captdallas on Dec 15, 2011 6:24 AM EST reply actions  

I've seen some games...

Wishart is the most ready, but I think he is defying some rules of physicality. They want him to be something he just doesn’t want to be.
deHaan is number two. He’ll be a good puck mover and play well in his own zone… but they might be afraid that a good check will end his career.
Ness has been a very good puck mover at the AHL level… but he makes Hillen look like Chris Pronger.
Donovan has the potential to be the best of the AHL rookie crop, but he has regressed some from last year. It’s probably playing in three systems in 6 months, with countless partners. He had Ness this year because they played together in the US development league. He’s gonna need Jurcina as a partner when he starts… Think Amac with more offensive upside.
Then there’s Klementyev. For developments sake, he woudl be my choice. He’d give them Eaton level defense without costing development time for the other younger-sters.
Given all of that, I think I’d go with Wishart and Klementeyev. But they can barely afford to let one D go from BPT. Their season is falling apart with all the callups, and it’s important that they make the playoffs too.

LighthouseHockey: We saw this coming!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Dec 15, 2011 8:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Kelemntyev

is pretty young still too. He’s the same age as Donovan and Ness, and only a year older then Cizikas and De Haan.

"I really wouldn’t wish rooting for both the Isles and Blues on anyone." Dominik
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Dec 15, 2011 9:08 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Yup

Klementyev seems a couple of years older to people than he really is because he was eligible to play in the AHL at 18 instead of 20.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Dec 15, 2011 9:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Age v Pro experience

I realize his age, but this is his third year in the AHL. He also had an NHL showing and he didn’t look too bad with limited exposure. It’s moot point now that deHaan has been recalled.
Let’s keep our fingers crossed!

LighthouseHockey: We saw this coming!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Dec 15, 2011 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Good point.

Id also be onboard with Klementyev coming up here.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Dec 15, 2011 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for the informative scouting report.

I have a better sense of who these prospects are now.

[Aaron Ness] makes Hillen look like Chris Pronger.

Three words come to mind: Oh. My. God.

Comic Book Writer by day; Islanders fanatic by Gameday

by Captdallas on Dec 15, 2011 10:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Should just go with 5

Put four forwards out with Mottau-he can cover them by himself.

by afrosupreme on Dec 15, 2011 9:13 AM EST reply actions  

Isles Put DiPi on IR

Not sure if anyone saw this. It’s on the NYI website

by JoRiverside on Dec 15, 2011 10:02 AM EST reply actions  

Figured they would

Unlike teams at or near the cap ceiling, whether a player here is on IR or not from one day to the next is not as big of a deal.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Dec 15, 2011 10:04 AM EST up reply actions  

IR

only affects roster spots, not the total salary, no? I thought guys on IR count against the cap, just ones on long term IR don’t.

In our case, DP on IR could actually be a useful thing at some point. It would allow us to roster 23 players, but still have his salary on the books, keeping us above the floor.

by afrosupreme on Dec 15, 2011 10:13 AM EST up reply actions  

A players caphit counts against the cap regardless of whether he is on IR. Short term or long term, their caphit doesnt not count at any point.

The IR thing affects cap ceiling teams. If your team is pressed against the ceiling, putting a player on IR allows the cap-pressed team to go over the ceiling by the emount of caphit they have placed on IR. That does not matter to the Islanders because the Isles have nothing BUT cap room.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Dec 15, 2011 10:20 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

If your team is pressed against the ceiling, putting a player on IR allows the cap-pressed team to go over the ceiling by the emount of caphit they have placed on IR.

That’s what I’m talking about-I’m pretty sure that is only with regards to LTIR players.

by afrosupreme on Dec 15, 2011 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Im pretty sure the only difference between IR and LTIR has to do with length of time and sending a player to the AHL for conditioning. I believe they work the same capwise. Maybe there are differences in taxes and insurance and things like that but nothing else I know of.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Dec 15, 2011 12:26 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

There’s a loophole that in essence lets teams exceed the cap by using it. Explained pretty well here.

The Caps are doing it with Poti as well. Seems like quite a few teams use it.

by afrosupreme on Dec 15, 2011 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Yup, thats what I was referring to saying that IR allows a cap-pressed team to go over the ceiling by the amount of caphit they have placed on IR. But that (obviously) doesnt apply to the Isles.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Dec 15, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Serious Question. Seriously...

If you’re Rick, at what point does retirement become a very real possibility? It’s got to close, right? I mean, how many times can you be placed on IR in one season, let alone five or six? And when he did play this year, it’s not like he was a brick wall out there.

Again, not trying to start the usual “DP Sucks/Give DP a chance” debate, just curious.

My totally fabricated guess: after the Islanders sign Neilsen, Parenteau, Montoya and whoever to extensions and don’t need his cap hit, Rick hangs ’em up. Which would be sad on about 1,000 different levels.

"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science

by PGI on Dec 15, 2011 10:29 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I think we're starting to see it sink in to his head

DiPietro’s demeanor has been completely different this year than in years past. He seems humbled to even have the opportunity to continue playing NHL hockey anymore, or at least that’s what I’ve gathered from his interviews.

I know this might seem dumb, but his epic beard’ing this season could also be a sign that he’s not the same anymore. I always remember him being a clean-shaven young kid, and now that he looks like a homeless bum, maybe he’s finally realizing that he’s no longer the same player he used to be.

Either way, his career is really tragic. I still believe he’d be a great face for the franchise in another position off the ice. He’s still incredibly well-liked.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Dec 15, 2011 10:36 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

When the new CBA gets written

Not too long from now a new CBA will get written that will probabaly reduce contracts to 7 years and allow a one time buy-out that does not extend the cap for twice the duration of the contract. At least that has been my guess.

by Hockey1919 on Dec 15, 2011 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Limits would be great- but I sincerely hope not (on the 2nd part).

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Dec 15, 2011 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

From Staple today:
Steve Staios, whose play has been as steady and effective as any Islanders defenseman the last three weeks, is out indefinitely with a possible concussion suffered in Tuesday’s 5-3 loss to the Canadiens.

That’s pretty damning of the few who are actually decent players.

by afrosupreme on Dec 15, 2011 10:15 AM EST reply actions  

I wonder if this happened when Staios got boarded at the end of the Hawks game...

….when he took that D.o.G. penalty, but nothing was called for ramming his head against the boards. The replay looks brutal- his head snapped into, and then back out of the boards…but he got up relatively quickly which is probably why nothing got called.

I didn’t notice any big hits in the Habs game, but if he sustained the trauma against the Hawks, it could have been a simple bump during warm ups that scrambled his noggin enough to be put on IR.

Sadly, it also scrambled his noggin enough to make some bone-headed plays during that game which cost the team dearly.

Ugh, depressing news all around. I’m not the biggest Staios fan, but he has been relatively steady, and would have been a great depth signing….if he was able to be the depth guy and not top pair.

Crossing my fingers CDH is this years’ T.H. Let’s go Islanders.

by Nyisles82 on Dec 15, 2011 11:59 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Woohoo!

Maybe we can get some back-line offense going!

No Sleep 'til....Belmont?

by Anarcurt on Dec 15, 2011 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

DeHaan...Cool; Poulin....Head scratch

Will be interesting to watch DeHaan in NHL debute, but why are they calling up Poulin. Is Nabo or Montoya hurt?

by JoRiverside on Dec 15, 2011 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Nabokov experienced "discomfort" yesterday, according to Staple

Maybe his helmet was on too tight.

"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science

by PGI on Dec 15, 2011 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

So....

why the fuck was Nabokov on the bench on Tuesday night if he wasn’t ready to play tonight? And why was Poulin returned to Bridgeport on Monday? And why was a clearly exhausted Al Montoya allowed to start on Tuesday night?

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Dec 15, 2011 10:42 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Why does God need a starship?

All of these are very good questions.

"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science

by PGI on Dec 15, 2011 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Did Poulin get a start in BPT?

Figure get him a game in and “hope” Nabokov isn’t needed. Not the first time they’ve bluffed their way through a backup goaltender.

by Hockey1919 on Dec 15, 2011 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

So…. why the fuck was Nabokov on the bench on Tuesday night if he wasn’t ready to play tonight? And why was Poulin returned to Bridgeport on Monday? And why was a clearly exhausted Al Montoya allowed to start on Tuesday night?

Guess they thought he was ready, then he wasnt. Groin injuries are like that, though.
I cannot explain why Poulin was returned before Montreal, though… the only explanation I have is that they wanted to keep giving Montoya a chance to redeem himself after a couple of less than stellar games.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Dec 15, 2011 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

there were two days off between games

It’s not like they were going back-to-back nights with Montoya.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Dec 15, 2011 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

So

think they actually play Poulin? Wouldn’t mind seeing that.

by afrosupreme on Dec 15, 2011 10:48 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip and shoulder surgery not required.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Being Reasonable About Garth Snow’s First Rounders
Billy_smith_si_cover_small
LightHouse Hockey game on!
Gigantor15_small
LHH Poster's 25U25 Consensus
Jt_small
The New York Islanders and The Rebuild

Recent FanPosts

Warlord2_small
Breaking Down the Cloutier - Salo Fight
Dutchlogo_small
LHH off-season fantasy league
890_1__small
Expectations: Strome
Small
The Angstlander -- Inside the mind of an anxious Islanders fan (that means you!)
Small
Now that Phoenix has found itself a new owner...
Tubby_goalie_gif_small
Is Garth Snow actually drafting well, or are we all just pr*j*ct*ng again?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
What else is Russian sports media telling us?

  135 votes | Results

Isles Reading

Islanders Schedule

1979-80


May 24, 1980: Tonelli to Nystrom. At long last, the steady build of the New York Islanders from expansion doormat to surprise semifinalist to annual contender reaches the promised land: Buoyed by a late season trade for Butch Goring that gave the team the depth up the middle GM Bill Torrey had been seeking, the Islanders knock off the Philadelphia Flyers in six games.

The victory justified the faith in coach Al Arbour who guided them from their second season to their first Stanley Cup seven seasons later. The Islanders would not be the first expansion team to win the Stanley Cup, but they would be the only one capable of a dynasty.

1980-81


May 21, 1981: This time it was much easier. After falling to "only" 91 points in the 1979-80 season, the Islanders returned to their division title tradition, piling up 110 points -- a whole 13 points over second-place Philadelphia.

Between the quarterfinals (where they beat the upstart Oilers in six games) and the finals, the Islanders reeled off eight consecutive wins -- with a four-game sweep of archrival Rangers in between. As they defeated the Minnesota North Stars in five games for their second Cup, their goal difference in the final was a combined +10.

1981-82


May 16, 1982: Another year, another landslide title. The Islanders won the Patrick Division by a whopping 26 points over the second-place Rangers, and were seven points clear of their nearest competition for the President's Trophy, the still-not-quite-ripe Edmonton Oilers.

A first-round scare against the Pittsburgh Penguins turned in the Isles' favor thanks to John Tonelli's heroics, and a true dynasty was on its way: Past the Rangers in six games, then an eight-game sweep of the Quebec Nordiques and Vancouver Canucks to run away with the Stanley Cup.

1982-83


May 17, 1983: Not so fast, whipper-snappers. The Edmonton Oilers' steadily rising challenge for league supremacy took them all the way to the finals for the first time, where the New York Islanders summarily dispatched them in a four-game sweep. For the Islanders, the Dynasty was secured. For the Oilers, it was a powerful lesson in where talent ends and the demands of playoff hockey begin.

Four years, four Cups, 16 consecutive playoff series wins (a record that would grow to 19 until the rematch with the Oilers the following year). Mike Bossy scored 60 goals yet again, and Wayne Gretzky became acquainted with Billy Smith's crease.


Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Warlord2_small Mark D

Lighthouse_hockey_logo_2_medium_small Keith Quinn

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Hg_small Chris McNally

Master of FIGs and Power Tablature

Icon3_small ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein

71096_479208120482_1257968_n_small David Hanssen