Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Troubled Yankees Join Troubled Red Sox In Last Place

Recap - Avalanche 4, Islanders 3 (OT): Blown 3-0 lead = 1-5-3

It's difficult to retain any sense of sober analysis on nights like these, where you swear the Bettman Bonus Point was instituted to make less infuriating those nights when the officiating delivers 60+ minutes of incompetence.

GS | ES | H2H | Shifts | Corsi | Zones | Recaps: NHL | Isles | LHH+/- | SBN

You want to shout at the team for blowing a 3-0 lead. You want to shout at the refs for stopping at two goalie interference calls, calling Matt Martin for an instigator but allowing David Jones to instigate freely, putting the wrong man in the box in the first, and calling a 4-on-3 in OT because Al Montoya stepped to the top of his much-invaded crease.

And you want to shout at coach Jack Capuano for calling a timeout after the second Avalanche goal only to send ... Mike Mottau and Mark Eaton right back out there.

Star-divide

There were meaningful developments in this game, mostly by a host of forwards who made that 3-0 lead possible, as well as by Matt Martin for defending John Tavares when the Avs gameplan included running Montoya and JT and daring the officials to stop them.

But the end result is another massive opportunity lost: The Isles are on a 1-5-3 run. And the alternative in tonight's alternate universe, 2-5-2, would hardly get them out of the woods.

 

ZGC

We called out the Zero Goal Club in the preview, and Josh Bailey took his name off the list. Nice powerplay tip off a Mark Streit shot to open scoring. He had one moment with a one-goal lead when he tried to get too precise and lost the puck in his own zone, but otherwise Bailey continued a slow path of revival.

Kyle Okposo is still a ZGC member, but he had the type of game that originally endeared him to Islanders fans: He used his body to win battles along the boards and in the center of the ice. More of that please.

Blake Comeau is a guy.

 

Goaltending

Al Montoya is who helped keep the game 3-0 for so long. Colorado is one of the rinks that inflates shot totals, so saying he stopped 47 saves is probably a stretch. But they probably didn't make up 17 shots. Montoya did well. The second goal he would like to have back, but it was a fluke from the toe of his pad trapping the puck and sliding it back into the net as he pulled out of his stretch. The third goal too, he missed the handle, although the deflection off Mottau's stick created the tricky changeup.

He's not free of his blame on his OT penalty, either: He was marking his crease -- which was invaded all night including in OT -- but the refs were watching and possibly looking for a call after his previous run-in with Gabriel Landeskog.

Late in the game Twitter was aflutter with rumors of an Evgeni Nabokov trade, to Columbus, and even tantalizingly for Fedor Tyutin, who's a good defensemen with an insane contract extension that begins in 2012-13. All reports of the deal -- which even made it on to the Isles broadcast after JIggs McDonald referenced an Arthur Staple retweet -- were retracted.

 

Officiating Circus

Which blown or missed call ticked me off more? Marty Reasoner getting absolutely leveled in the high slot with a lower back crosscheck, or Steve Staios getting called for a crosscheck that was innocent by comparison and was actually protecting Montoya? Jay Pandolfo being called for a hold that Matt Duchene initiated by clutching his arm and not letting go -- creating a 5-on-3 -- or the selective use of the instigator?

Don't know, and don't care after tonight. We'd not be having this discussion if the Islanders hadn't faded in the third, or if the Islanders had capitalized one of their chances to make it 4-0. The officiating stunk, but unfortunately that's part of hockey.

 

Players You Count On

Despite just one goal, Grabner's, Michael Grabner and John Tavares were creating chances all night, with five shots each. P.A. Parenteau and Frans Nielsen were also very good, even creating a goal which Brian Rolston finished well. Matt Martin continued his promising season and deserved the powerplay time he received.

Overall, I found the Islanders' passing much improved as they took what a porous Avalanche defense gave them. How to explain the third period collapse, I'm not sure. Parenteau refutes the age-old Mile High altitude concern (video below) and the Islanders did not so much appear to be in a third-period shell as in a steadily cascading series of mistakes and bad bounces. Another lesson for a still young team (despite the token veterans who are trotted out on Versus telecasts)? Poor play meets poor officiating?

 

Game Highlights

Jack Capuano Post-Game: Refs "See What They Wanna See"

Cappy says overall good effort, but got themselves into penalty trouble and paid.


 

Bailey, Parenteau, Eaton Post-Game

PAP: Stopped playing our game in the third period. Altitude is no excuse and played no role in the collapse. Unacceptable, he said.


Vancouver's next, Sunday. Matt "Coulson's" turn to shine.

Comment 304 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

We got some bad calls,

but lets not get all conspiracy about it. Let’s just focus on that awful, awful game.

Stainer of mountaintops.

by Chairman Meow on Nov 11, 2011 2:18 AM EST reply actions  

I thought Butchie's Toyota with the save call would be tonights highlight

but I cant stop laughing at:

Blake Comeau is a guy.

author of "57 Easy Ways to Score More Than 2 Goals a Game"

by Chris McNally on Nov 11, 2011 2:22 AM EST reply actions  

....who sometimes might indeed be confused with Blake LIVELY on some nights.....

 - OK, not really.

In memoriam: Virginia Ariel Cayon 1927-2011 R.I.P. Mom

by ogam5 on Nov 11, 2011 6:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Aka

Passenger 57

Get out of the sticks, Charles, move to Queens!! Come, Get some respect a Professional team deserves!!

by Martys301 on Nov 11, 2011 9:58 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

sadly, nothing is lively about Blake right now

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

except for her large breasts

That’s what we were talking about, right?

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

sadly, no

But thanks for trying to cheer me up, Fab.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Someone say boobs?

/suddenly over the losing

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Nov 11, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Damn, I already posted in the plus/minus thread

Long story short: If the Islanders played a 60 minute game for once, incompetent refs probably wouldn’t matter.

Good on Bailey for showing up. Now shave that mustache.

"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science

by PGI on Nov 11, 2011 2:22 AM EST reply actions  

No way!!

Movember bro, and it’s probably for charity. Check out Movember.com and then everything in your life will make sense.

by Empire39 on Nov 11, 2011 6:08 AM EST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

and this officiating will effect the Isles chances to make the playoffs...

If we have any chance to make the 8th spot we will be livid when we lose by the skin of our teeth because the refs decided to fuck us over again and again all season…Its gonna suck when its the end of the year and its coming to the wire and this shit happens….Remember that game against the Devils at the end of last year?The phantom 10 minute major to Nielson for roughing or something ridiculous that gave the Devils the chance to tie the game and win and they did?It gave the Devils 2 points and brought them only 8 pts out of the 8th spot and the Isles would’ve been only 9 pts out…It was a robbery of the refs…The reason it happened is because the Devils were 10 pts out and were in a playoff race and the Isles were 11 points out and they WERE NOT in a playoff race…lol Thats the bias…I remember Chico Resch saying the Devils NEED the game but the Isles WANT this game for other reasons…How fucking telling is that?Basically discrediting the Isles as if they don’t have a right to go for the playoffs like the Devils…When refs hear that shit all the time I’m sure they make calls against…Its probably not even done purposely because its ts all subconscious…The refs subconsciously screw the Isles on a nightly basis…When will the Isles step up and complain to the league about this shit?

by KO21 on Nov 11, 2011 8:18 AM EST up reply actions  

I am aware of Movember

I am also aware that Bailey looks like a background extra from Starsky & Hutch.

"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science

by PGI on Nov 11, 2011 12:25 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

true

but the zebras dont respect the Isles…They make choices based on their biases…Its so apprent and makes it hard to watch these games…
i

by KO21 on Nov 11, 2011 8:03 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Defensemen Grades

Kyle 0; Post 1.
The defensemen were headed towards (perhaps) season-high grades through two periods. Mottau actually looked to be in the ‘B’ range, AMac was playing very well in his defensive zone, and Streit was close to playing an ‘A’ game. Then came the 3rd period, the Isles shelled up, started to ease up on the forecheck (which become a "just hope we can clear the zone" less than halfway through the 3rd). That’s when the defense’s holes started to show. A strange goal seemed to pull in off Montoya’s toe strap, then a weak goal (even if it was deflected), and Isles were all of a sudden tied and scrambling.
Streit: B+. Excellent first two periods. Helped to set up a couple key scoring chances.
3.129 (13 games played)
Staios: C+. Is he overly physical at times? Yes, but that is better for Isles than him playing soft.
2.282 (13)
Hamonic: B+. He was on his game for the first two periods. He shows again why he’s the Isles’ go-to defensive defenseman.
3.119 (13)
Officials: F. I have a personal peeve against refs who call penalties without seeing them happen. The first two penalties of the game were each called without the officials actually seeing them happen. AMac’s high stick sent two teammates to the box. Rolston’s swing of the stick caught nothing but air. But at least these first two faith calls helped lessen my disappointment when Pandolfo was called for absolutely nothing, an Avalanche was let off easy with a 2-minute minor after running Montoya elbow-first. (He KNEW the goalie was there. He KNEW the defenseman was there. He KNEW his elbow was going straight into Montoya’s melon.) Two or three of the home games really bothered me when the Isles got the worse of the calls, but this one is perhaps the worst of the season thus far.
AMac: B. AMac looked very comfortable in his own zone securing and advancing the puck in the first two periods. Still shies away from shooting too much. He has a good shot.
2.778 (13)
Eaton: B-. Pretty good.
2.315 (13)
Mottau: C+ He actually looked good through 2 periods. He’s much better when Isles have possession than when Isles are in their defensive shell. (He’s actually a pretty good/smart puck mover, if you watch him closely. Just can’t defend for his life when forwards are attacking with speed.)
1.990 (8)
Not in action:
Jurcina:
2.278 (5) (About a ‘C+’ average.)

by North Dakota Red Eagle on Nov 11, 2011 2:33 AM EST reply actions  

Just can’t defend for his life when forwards are attacking with speed.

The worst part about this is, he’s a defenseman…

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

I mentioned this in the game thread

But my lasting memory of this season, or this first quarter, is Mottau and Eaton both sprinting toward their own zone as the rush comes. It’s like a movie where the extras are running from the grenade.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Nov 11, 2011 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

It's that exact moment that prompted me to question whether leaving it would be a good idea

to pair Hamonic with Mottau/Eaton and MacDonald with the other one because holy fucking hell, that’s not the way defense works.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Wisj I could summon the strength to write Daily about this disgraceful display of officiating.....

…..but more and more, I just can’t allow myself to care that much; nothing seems to change – LEAST of all the GDed atrocious calls, and this team just hasn’t the requisite resilience yet to absorb such a GNAWING disappointment, hence the 3rd-period collapse…..based upon his recent comments, Travis Hamonic is definitely shaping up to be prime captain material, though!

In memoriam: Virginia Ariel Cayon 1927-2011 R.I.P. Mom

by ogam5 on Nov 11, 2011 6:36 AM EST reply actions  

Thats so true...Isles fans say that if the Isles played a full 60 minutes the refs wouldn't have made a difference...

But thats not fair to say…Its deflating to a young team when the officials literally disrespect them as if they aren’t as important as the other team they’re playing…Its gotta be so frustrating to think that the refs and the league can allow this shit to happen…They work so hard to play well in this league only for this league to shit all over them…

by KO21 on Nov 11, 2011 8:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree

It’s complete horseshit to say that the Islanders’ lack of a 3rd period is a result of anything other than horrific officiating. The Avs were playing a dangerous game all night, and how the Winnik penalty got only a 2 minute minor is ridiculous. Also, how do you completely miss one penalty, and then call the wrong guy on another penalty? There are four fucking officials on the ice – how they continuously miss/botch calls and continue to keep their jobs astounds me.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 10:13 AM EST up reply actions  

I truly believe its all in the refs subconscious to penalize the Isles...

But where is the Isles brass to protest or call a meeting about this bullshit???Lets be proactive…Make the league take a look at whats happening…If the refs know they are being watched I guarantee they will be more careful….The Isles need to stand up for themselves….

by KO21 on Nov 11, 2011 10:19 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

There might be some going on behind the scenes

I felt like Cap saying “they called what they want to see” is a precursor statement before we see some louder action by the team. I’d imagine that we’ll see another February 11th if this shit with the refs continues.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 10:31 AM EST up reply actions  

there's got to be a breaking point

I’m sure they don’t want to make it worse – human nature is to dig in when you get bitched at, and it might make the refs more unfair if the Isles sound off. And I can guarantee that those guys aren’t trying to be biased. The refs may not always do a good job, but I don’t think they go into games with an agenda like “Screw the Islanders, they suck.” If there’s any bias like that, it’s got to be something unconscious and unaware.

What I would love to see happen now that Sheriff Shanaban is in town is more internal review. The refs do have to be held to a more vigorous standard. I think that they need coaching and “reps” the way players do. I know this already goes on, but whatever’s going on, it isn’t working as well as it could. Some of these calls are unfathomable for the top pro hockey league in the world.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 12:12 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I don’t think they go into games with an agenda like "Screw the Islanders, they suck." If there’s any bias like that, it’s got to be something unconscious and unaware.

These unfair game-changer calls are adding up but I agree with you that the bias we are seeing is most likely something that these refs are not conscious they are doing.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Nov 11, 2011 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Like Ive been saying..Its rooted in their subconscious mind....

As mikb was saying, I doubt they go into games with an agenda or an axe to grind…But when the league and the media continuously disrespect the Isles it will be absorbed in the refs and the fans collective consciousness…The Isles were fined and painted as the goons after the reckoning against the Pens in which we won 9-2 just added to that negativity….The league basically said that the Isles were guilty and the Pens were innocent…This isnt a good thing…

by KO21 on Nov 11, 2011 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed.

They need to send a video to Bettman. highlighting the bad calls. It was perhaps Milbery’s finest moment when he sent video to the bettman’s office. Why is that they never even come out say we botched that call. Not to say it matters that much, but at least baseball and NFL act like they are watching the refs and at least doing lip service to keeping them honest. I think lip service is better than nothing. It at least puts a momentary BAD spotlight on a ref for messing up the call….enough to perhaps make them try harder. But when there’s not even an acknowledgment of bad cal, then the refs feel like they can call whatever they want whenever. I hate conspiracy theories, but does Betman not want the Isles on the Island……does he want them to stick so attendance stays low and team is moved off the Island.

by NewIsles on Nov 11, 2011 11:11 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

imagine if

DP let in 2 softies in the 3rd to blow the lead. DP took a foolish penalty which cost the OT? Imagine the venomous posts we would have seen, wishing him gone, injured, deported, etc. Montoya sure gets a lot of love and compassion around here. Just sayin’.

by randyboyd on Nov 11, 2011 7:26 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

You are right...

I was one of the guys calling for Montoya, and he was awful. He made some good saves, but when the game was on the line he failed. Period.
I still think he should get at least the next two starts though, since he had not started a game in two weeks.
But no excuses, he did not get the job done last night.

by JackandAce on Nov 11, 2011 9:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Can't completely agree with this assessment of Al......

…..I get the distinct feeling he was worried about the previous injury (hence the trip to the bench in OT) and the garbage Colorado was hurling at him severely rattled his composure…..can’t let him off the hook entirely, but the refs definitely contributed to it happening…..

In memoriam: Virginia Ariel Cayon 1927-2011 R.I.P. Mom

by ogam5 on Nov 11, 2011 9:24 AM EST up reply actions  

DP

Well, I made the same point about DP, so as said above, lets be consistent. I still think Montoya is our goalie, but he needs to do better than that.
Let me put it this way…I have watched some Ranger games, and Lundquist always steals some games for them. Just the other night, the Rangers won in Ottawa when they should have lost. Play was in their zone most of the night. I think their goalie steals 5, maybe 10, wins a year for them.
I just want to see one of our goalies do it once.

by JackandAce on Nov 11, 2011 9:45 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m originally from Long Island, but now that I’ve moved to Nashville I’ve started to become a huge Predators fan and it’s the same way with Pekka Rinne. I can’t tell you how hard these games would be to watch if it wasn’t for Peks in the net. We’ve been allowing a ridiculous amount of shots on the goal and he somehow keeps stealing games for us.

by WTPuck?! on Nov 11, 2011 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Good comparison

I am now on official “Goalie Stole One” watch.
I want to see the next time one of our goalies, anyone of them, steal a win for us.
Outshot, out-timeofpossioned, out chanced, tilted ice in the wrong direction…it has to be one of those types of games, not just a one goal game.
Whats the over/under on that?

by JackandAce on Nov 11, 2011 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

You don't think

Al stole the game against MN?

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, he definitely won.

Does letting in one goal automatically = “stole one”, or is that just a goalie having an admirable game?

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Nov 11, 2011 1:31 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I'd say number of goals

doesn’t necessarily matter as much as coming up with a lot of and/or big saves that let your team win when they don’t play particularly well.

I thought in that game we were outplayed for more than 40 minutes and he made a bunch of big saves in that stretch.

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

For me it’s not just about the number of goals, it’s really about the momentum they deliver tot he team as well. When everything is going wrong but your goalie just stood on his head and defied physics to keep you in the game and the team can win it, THAT is when a goalie steals a game.

by WTPuck?! on Nov 11, 2011 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Minnesota game

To me, he did not steal it. Can’t say I remember it all, but I did look up saves, and he made 20, and the Islanders took 15 shots. Certainly not a wide disparity. And time in zone was not all that different, as I remember.
He just won it, did not steal it.

by JackandAce on Nov 11, 2011 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

And of course

there is an arbitrary nature to this, though we wer outchanced a good bit in that game, despite the low shot totals.

And I remember him handling a couple of tough sequences that day, but it was a couple of weeks ago…

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Stole one

Here is one that may be happening now. Hawks playing Emery against Calgary. Chicago looks terrible in the first 12 minutes, Flames have a power play and control the zone almost the whole two min. Emery makes 3 or 4 big saves including one at point blank range. Hawks score about 1min after power play expires.Chicago looks like a completely different team now, Should they go on to win, This would be a steal to me.
  A goaltender that controls the game until rest of the team wakes up and starts playing, has at the very least “stole” part of the game. You could argue that he just “kept them in it” until the boys got started,but you could really see the Hawks intensity level change after the power play. Like Oh crap! this guy is carrying us and wants to win, we better pick up the pace.

Back....
had to take a Campbell and wipe my Bettman.

by skeeterman on Nov 11, 2011 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

The last guy to be able to do that was Roli...

In fact DP had stolen his fair share of games before his injuries…

by KO21 on Nov 11, 2011 7:45 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

thank you.....

Its ridiculous. I cant believe people are making excuses for Montoya. How many nice saves did Montoya make during this game? I didnt see anything where Montoya robbed anyone. Shot total is irrelevant when you let in 2 absolutely terrible goals to complete a 3 goal comeback by the other team. The goal in OT wasnt the greatest either. He couldnt see but that shot floated in from just inside the blueline. Where is your positioning?
Also, does anyone know why Capuano called a timeout? I was actually pleasantly surprised that he used it and thought he was going to rip into the guys. Instead, the camera focuses on him and hes just standing behind the bench peering into space. This guy is clueless. All we’ve been doing with our young core is developing a losing atmosphere.

by LaFontaine16 on Nov 11, 2011 9:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Uh...

did you miss that amazing save in the first period when he was completely sprawled out in the crease and threw his stick into the net to save a goal?

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Montoya definitely made some spectacular saves

but he choked on the last 2.. I don’t even have a solution to who should start anymore… I think Montoya should still get the starts but now I think there should be a little more rotation than I initially thought… again, until proven otherwise

by BaltimoreIslander on Nov 11, 2011 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Thank you randyboyd

Al is getting a big pass on last night IMHO.

The 2 goals in the Third were softies.
DP would never get the benefit of the doubt like Montoya did 2nite.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Twitter: @mikeryaninc
"Past performance Is Not A Guarantee For Future Results"
"Listening is a Skill" -Jack Capuano

by FB4Real on Nov 11, 2011 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Not sure how "soft" any of those goals were.

1. 5-on-3 PK screened shot from the point, Staios doesn’t do anything with his check or the puck. rebound… goal. Yeah.. that was soft.
2. I’m not sure how that went in. there are three things it could have deflected in off of. Hamonic’s skate, the Av’s skate or the inside of Al’s pad. What does HE do better there to square up for that… maybe he’s a little deeper in the net.. I don’t know.
3. Looked like a tip by Mottau might have made it knuckle. Questionable… I’d have had to see it from his angle…
4. I’m not going to kill staios because of the 4-on-3 situation, but he’s caught in space while the free man is left to screen Montoya… no pressure on the puck and a free man in front of the net… yeah… pretty soft.
51 shots, 47 saves… yep… this one was montoya’s fault all the way.
Imagine if DP had a .920+ save percentage, how people would be saying he deserved the #1 spot.

LighthouseHockey: We saw this coming!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Nov 11, 2011 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

On 2 and 3. I watched them a few times last night. 2 he somehow managed to drag it in with his foot. Very strange. Never seen a goal go in like that. On 3 Mottau definitely deflected it and made it knuckle. Al still probably should have had it, but Mottau turned an easy save into a harder one. Slipped past his arm because of it.

And yea, anytime there are three players on the ice, it’s a miracle of the opposition doesn’t score.

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

I've had goal #2 happen to me

It becomes second nature, on those extention saves, to reset as soon as possible. The puck snuck under him, so when he reset he kicked it in himself. It’s not a good goal, but it’s also very fluky.

Third goal was definitely deflected. It reminded me a lot of Benoit Hogue’s goal against Tom Barrasso in ‘93, which would up deflecting back under Barrasso’s arm. But if you asked Al (and Tom) they probably would say that they’d like it back.

Fourth goal, I’d like to say is on Staios, who is for some inexplicable reason looks like he’s just imitating Jay Pandolfo at the top of the diamond instead of clearing his crease. But I think that’s got to be the way the PK is designed. They look like they don’t want to commit one guy to that at the expense of leaving the forward open near the circles. Of course, if Staios does that and Quincey gives it up to the wing guy, and the wing guy beats Montoya, then we think Staios screwed up his assignments… personally I’d rather an angle shot my goalie can see completely, instead of a dead-on shot my goalie can’t see, and which might be deflected by the screening forward. YMMV.

The skinny – individually you might not fault Al for any one of those goals, but taken as a whole, they look bad, especially with another goal waved off. And if getting knocked about rattled Al, I’d be even more worried.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 12:06 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

That last interference

he really got crushed on though. Looked like not only did the guy take the body, he elbowed him in the head too. I think Hamonic only held back because he knew we needed him on the ice for the rest of the game…

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed on that

By “rattled” I meant “skittish, nervous.” Contact is a given. And sometimes, outright dirty play is on order. You have to be able to endure that and not let it affect your play.

Being injured is another story. But even then, if he’d been hurt on that play and unable to perform, then he has to be replaced. I don’t expect him to make that call himself, necessarily.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

OK

I thought you meant more along the lines of angry, and taking penalties.

I agree, overall not a great outing, especially after a really strong start. But when you take it apart and one is really fluky, another was tricky, the others came with three Isles on the ice, and he saved 47 other shots, I’m less worried.

What I’d like to see is Cap go back to him to assure him one rough night isn’t going to cost him turns.

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 12:45 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Thanks for the explanation from a goalie perspective.

So collectively, that was a bad night for Montoya. And the “losing his edge” from contact thing could be worrisome. We’ll see how he responds in the future. I wasn’t a fan of him taking that penalty in OT any way you look at it. That’s the worst possible time to lose you top and get a penalty that could/did cost us the game.

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 12, 2011 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Man

as good as I thought Bailey seemed, that Corsi/Fenwick is ug-ly.

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 7:55 AM EST reply actions  

Yes

It amazes me that both Snow and Capuano ignore the fact that last year this team started doing well when they played with “snarl,” as you say. They started the snarl in games, and brought their level of intensity up for every game. The line-up included Gillies, Martin, Haley, and Konopka.
Now? Its just Martin.
Get used to our goalies being run.

by JackandAce on Nov 11, 2011 9:11 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Exactly...

We saw it all game last night- goalies being run down like deer crossing the road on Fire Island during mating season. Damn, it pisses me off- didn’t we learn from last season when we had to dig into the deepest depths of the minor leagues to find a goalie after EVERYONE got hurt?

by Nyisles82 on Nov 11, 2011 11:39 AM EST up reply actions  

I think if you need an 'us against the world' feeling to play up to the competition's level than you're probably not good

enough. You can’t sustain a fired-up ’we’re not going to take it anymore’ emotional state for a whole season. Right now I’d be happy to take a couple of weeks of it but its not a long-term solution.

by TMS71 on Nov 11, 2011 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

THEN -

then you’re probably not good enough’

by TMS71 on Nov 11, 2011 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Good point

I 100% agree- they probably only need that for a bit. 82 games is a long season. Hopefully though, our season doesn’t end at game 82….again.

It’s funny- this whole conversation makes me think of the cup finals last year- Vancouver’s steady, intellectual, calm play against the Bruins beat em to the puck, then beat em’ some more style of play. Bruins won, but not sure how much longer they can/could/will play like that. Bruins figured out how to cap their rage enough to get into the playoffs, then unleashed the beast (Chara?) to win it all. Vancouver never seemed to have that second gear…

by Nyisles82 on Nov 11, 2011 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

The lack of SNARL is a huge problem...

Isles fans were so proud of the young Islanders after they started to stick up for themselves last yr…I think Wanger doesnt believe in violence so we got rid of Konopka and sent Haley down…This is what happened under Gordon…We got pushed around…Watching JT get mugged last night was fucked up…The refs just let it go on for a while…So MM had to step up and get penalized…If the refs aren’t gonna do shit and our players get penalized for sticking up for each other, WTF are they supposed to do? That AV’s player went out to intimidate JT…It was disgusting to watch because JT doesnt play dirty…What other reason would that AVs player be roughing him up?Made me sick

by KO21 on Nov 11, 2011 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Good point

11/24/10
In capuano’s 4th game as the NYI head coach he did something that had been missing since Nolan’s last game. Watch that video. Gillies got the same 2-5-10 that Martin did last night. The difference is that Martin is an adequate fighter, Gillies is a PUNISHER.
Konopka was a nice shot of adrenaline for the players and crowd every once in a while, but he rarely was there to punish… he was more important as a FO guy. I’d rather have Reasoner winning faceoffs, and Gillies or Haley up as guys who make noses bleed.
But those guys are luxuries that teams that score two goals per game can not easily afford. They might be the spark that gets things going, but the more likely scenario, as we saw all too often is that they are the 4 minute per game defensive liabilities that do little but try to pump up the team from the bench.
Martin did what he could, and maybe the promotion of Nino will bring back Gillies. I thought Haley would have been a possibility, but not the way he’s been performing at the AHL level, and not with three goalies jamming up the roster. Gillies would mean that Pandolfo (almost a lock to disapper when Nino is returned) and Rolston (temporarily) will be waived or in the press box.
What they really need is a D, that can give them 18 minutes a night, and will drop them. Hamonic is going to be that guy… but much like Martin, he’s still a guard puppy.
That’s the problem with building through the draft is that you can’t fix everything in one cycle. We can’t get to a defense that includes Hamonic, Mayfield, Pedan and Kichton soon enough.

LighthouseHockey: We saw this coming!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Nov 11, 2011 9:15 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Al Arbour

Hall of Famer Arbour was one who alued the quality of grit. Back in the days before championships, when the team looked stale, he would put the third/fourth line of St. Laurent, Howatt, and Nystrom on the ice. The purpose was nothing but hitting (they were 3 guys just looking to play in the NHL and to stay— -scoring a goal was a dream for them then). The purpose was not only to send a message to the other team, but also to his own team.
And even after the cup years, Arbour carried Baumgartner AND Vukota on the same team.
This organization just does not grasp this point at all now.

by JackandAce on Nov 11, 2011 9:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree...

but at this point they need to establish three quality lines before they put that fourth one together. One of the problems is that there is a LACK OF GRIT in the components that make up the top three lines.
They need more from Blake and Okposo… which I think they’re starting to get.
They need to get Martin into that mix as well.. I thought I saw more Comeau-Bailey-Martin in the past two games. That needs to be permanent.
Nino plays a phylsical game… that will help form a base. Then you can have a Michael Haley or a Trevor 2.0 on the fourth line.
I hate to keep harping on the same old thing, but Rolston and Pandolfo are a downgrade in that dynamic. I’m really happy that Rolston could find an area where nobody could touch him to get his second goal, but the rest of the game… nada.
I don’t know if they need a “fourth line” to take care of it. I’d like to see a little more physicality on all four lines. And if you need a spark for three shifts per game, put the banges together for 45 seconds.
That would mean something like this:
Moulson-Tavares-Okposo (B)
Grabner-Nielsen-Nino (B)
Comeau(B)-Bailey-Parenteau
Martin(B)-Reasoner-Ullstrom/Haley(B)/Gillies(B)
Until Okposo fully embraces the physical side of his role it will be lacking. It’s just not going to happen as long as Rolston and Pandolfo are on the ice.

LighthouseHockey: We saw this coming!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Nov 11, 2011 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

I think you summarized my point much more succinctly than I did with:

“I hate to keep harping on the same old thing, but Rolston and Pandolfo are a downgrade in that dynamic.”

I like both of those guys, even when they played for the Devils and were trapping the air out of the fans. They’re just not the moves that should have been made, given the kids that surround them. They don’t have the veteran passion, they have to much tread on their tires, and they don’t bring the grit.

I believe they were brought in to help us in the situation that we aspire to be in- a playoff race and series, where nerves would be calmed by the old dudes who’ve seen it all before. I’m hoping this season doesn’t turn out such that those moves were 1-2 seasons too early…

by Nyisles82 on Nov 11, 2011 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

again... I agree.

I think the two was too early and too many.
One of them was enough. Rolston (CAP MULE) heals the floor issue and may have been a slight upgrade over Hunter. I hated the move, but understood it. With Ullstrom and Nino earning early opportunities the signing of Pandolfo really took the wind out fo my sails.
Jeez.. you make the team 100 times better with reasoner replacing konopka… then you take away fourth line grit (haley?) or the spark of youth (Nino/Ullstrom) with Pandolfo…
Yeah… I agree.. and the team won’t be fully functional until one of those things is addressed.

LighthouseHockey: We saw this coming!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Nov 11, 2011 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

If he does indeed 'use it'.

We will see.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Nov 11, 2011 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I trust that he will..

“use it”… given that’s how he’s played in every NHL appearance. His “hits” seem to be tainted by who was counting them, but he started at home with 5, then 4 and after seemingly invisible road stats he wound up with 16 hits in 9 games. I have a feeling as a 19 year old we can expect 3 per game on average. It’s not a very good stat to go by because it’s so subjective… but he’s a kid that likes to get into the mix. That was evident in his WJC performances.
I hope he fills out more to expectations… he looked a little more like Josh Bailey than Matt Martin in his lates visits… and Josh just isn’t built for putting his shoulder into guys… though he should do it more.

LighthouseHockey: We saw this coming!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Nov 11, 2011 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

it'll be interesting

I think he’s used to ‘use it’ just due to him having been one of the biggest bodys in his leagues for years. That’s not a bad mindset to have and clearly I don’t expect him to shy away from contact. But I don’t expect his hitting to be great. I guess he’ll arrive late more often than not. Not late in the sense that it’ll cost him penalties, but just a little late to make a true impact on the defender who might just have enough time to still make a clean pass or get out of the way. And I fear that will then take Nino out of some plays and make them vulnerable when it’s going the other way. So, in some way I hope he’ll be rather selective with his hitting.

by BenHasna on Nov 12, 2011 3:55 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Good points, but the game has changed some.

We need grit, but so much of the NHL game is about speed now….more than ever.

by NewIsles on Nov 11, 2011 11:17 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Long gone are those days when.............

The team would sacrafice body and soul, win or loose! every game!

We are all Islanders, even if we’re from Jersey!

by Russel Ginart on Nov 11, 2011 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

honestly?

I call BS. Just looking at the result isn’t enough to make this assertion.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 12:28 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Not looking at just results, it seems to be a pattern.

Either this team does NOT show up for the first period, then plays well the final two. Or plays well for a short amount of time and falters later on. Last night they played well for two perods and basically rested on their laurels.
Either way the only 60 min complete effort this year was vs. thye Caps.

We are all Islanders, even if we’re from Jersey!

by Russel Ginart on Nov 11, 2011 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

That was a 60 minute effort?

They trailed that game 2-0 after one. Where were those 20 minutes?

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 12:45 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

mikb you just hit the nail on the head of what Im trying to state.

"imposed their will" FOR TWO PERIODS "didn’t let up." FOR TWO PERIODS.

We are all Islanders, even if we’re from Jersey!

by Russel Ginart on Nov 11, 2011 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Not so

I’m saying that they played EXACTLY THE SAME WAY in the third as they did in the first two, and got outscored. You’re saying that because they got outscored, they MUST NOT HAVE played the same way.

And what I’m saying is, that line of thinking is flawed. What I’m saying (again) is that the way they lost this game is UNFAIRLY changing our perceptions of how they played. You’re being fooled by the end result. If the end result had been different everyone would have praised the whole effort, not the part of it that turned out well for them.

In other words, your reply is what proves my point, and not the other way around.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 12:57 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Don't understand

You can’t say “if the end result would have been different,” and then disregard all things some people say COULD have made that end result different.
We have not had a physical presence at all this season, other than one guy (Martin), and yeah, Hamonic. Two guys.
Let me go back to the Cup years and list all the players who played with grit (as defined by hitting, checking, and/or once in a while fighting): Nystrom, Howatt, Langevin, Potvin, Lane, Sutter (both), Trottier, Gillies, and Tonelli. Thats 10 guys, almost half the lineup. Throw Smith in there too. And yes, each one also was a good hockey player in their own right.
I think currently we have two.
I just think this team minimizes the importance of “grit”…and they do it at their own peril.
We need some sandpaper on this team.

by JackandAce on Nov 11, 2011 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

It's pretty hard to find guys like Jethro, Tonelli, Nystrom

I’m not discounting things that could make a difference, at all. I’m saying that those things often don’t really make the difference. I’m saying that those ten guys helped a lot more with their excellent play than they ever did by punching people in the head. And I’m saying that, if the Isles do everything exactly the same in last night’s third period but get a couple of different bounces, our perception of that period is entirely different – even though they didn’t change a single thing. All it takes is Al to accidentally kick the puck into the corner, or for Mottau’s deflection to sail over the glass, or for Grabs to catch a hole in Giguere’s stance on either breakaway. That’s it. And then we would all be saying that this was a complete game and a great win.

My point isn’t really the composition of the team, but just the general idea that it must be a personal failing of the Islanders every single time something bad happens to them. I don’t see that at all. I’m not saying it can’t be true or they can’t do things differently, just that last night is not the best example. It was a gut-punch game and in the aftermath people are emotional and frustrated; then they naturally think that some lack of spirit caused the loss, instead of realizing that the loss is what makes everyone dispirited. The players are in that sense no different than we are, and so when they talk about their own frustration we understand it completely. It doesn’t mean that either they or the fans are correct to say “they wanted it more” or any such clichéd nonsense.

I just think it sells the Isles short to say that they lost BECAUSE their effort faltered and their will left them in the final third of the game. I disagree entirely and wholeheartedly.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

There we go

There we go with stereotypes…grit “means punching people in the head.” Most of those people listed above hardly ever threw any punches.
Not at all…it means recognizing that hockey is, and always has been, a physical and emotional game. That never changes. If you don’t bring some kind of physical edge, you will not be successful in hockey.
As our line-up is currently constituted, there is no physical edge. None.
And therefore, you get goalies plowed. You get your star pummeled (we were only lucky that Martin happened to be on the ice at the time).
I guess we just have to wait for another Pittsburgh moment to change…if only for a few games.

by JackandAce on Nov 11, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah something tells me Cal Clusterf*cks rampant hitting

Isnt really making the Wild a better team
And if hitting more =Better, more passionate team, then the rangers would have a dynasty by now because since Tortorella took over, all they do is hit and grind and jam and hit some more

"Mario Lemiuex… I used to respect you."- Turgeon1992

by Zhora on Nov 11, 2011 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

You are missing the point, IMHO...

If teams think they can manhandle the Isles or intimidate them then that’s what equates to the running of the goalies and assaulting of out star players…If apposing players know that the Isles can’t be intimidated they will just play the game…Did u see what happened to JT last night???That was ridiculous…That Av’s player was roughing JT up and he kept pushing and trying to intimate him because that AV’s player has no respect or fear of repercussions…Matt Martin did what he needed to do but we need more of that from other guys on the team….Or this shit will continue

by KO21 on Nov 11, 2011 8:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I am not missing the point

To me, the definition of “not being intimidated” is not getting knocked off your game by people taking liberties. The definition of “repercussions” is scoring on the man advantages. The definition of “resilience” is keeping up the effort and the discipline despite adversity It would be counterproductive to merely rough up the opponents in response, and wind up, just as a for instance, surrendering two power-play goals to help blow a three-goal lead.

Hell, I’m a goalie. We had an archrival for years, with a guy who made a point of crashing through my crease every single game we played – until one of our guys, who outweighed the crasher by about 70 pounds, blew him up with a huge (clean) bodycheck. He never bothered me again, and that was cool. I really appreciated it. BUT it would have meant next to nothing if we didn’t have guys who could play the game. We didn’t win because my teammate stuck up for me. We had beaten them before that moment, before my friend ever joined the team. We didn’t finally get the better of those guys by hitting them… we did it by scoring five power-play goals in the championship game. We didn’t punish them with hits, we punished them with skill.

Honestly, the Isles can fight back all they want, but they’ll still lose if they don’t put pucks in the net. And they won’t win respect either. Lots of respect the Isles won last year with the Pittsburgh game, sticking up for themselves. That really put a stop to the liberties people take with JT and the Isles’ goalies. Thank goodness that never happens any more!

I’m sorry, KO. I don’t mean to be a jackass to you. Believe me it’s not personal. It’s just that all I seem to hear is this litany of “toughness! heart! passion! moar moneys and siez OMG! one !” And I hear it loudest of all when the team struggles, and magically not any more when they win. It drives me crazy. This was the same freakin’ team from Woevember and the Feb 11 game. And this is going to be the same team now and in three months – until Nino gets in here, and that is a skill upgrade as well as a toughness upgrade. The Isles need scoring and defense… the intangible stuff alone isn’t going to win them doodly-squat.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 9:02 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

So in other words you need both???

scoring and physicality…Not sure what the argument is here…

by KO21 on Nov 12, 2011 5:31 AM EST up reply actions  

"not sure what the argument is here"

Yeah, I’m reading it now and wondering what was up with me! Sorry man. It looks like we agree, but just emphasize different aspects of it more heavily.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 12, 2011 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I think this team is making us all crazy…

Its unbelievably frustrating and completely maddening because its true. :(

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Nov 14, 2011 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

The player you are talking about is Ryan Wilson. And that wasn’t a disrespect thing – he does that to everyone. Wings, Hawks, Nucks, Bs, Sens – you name it, Wilson checks it like a freaking Mack Truck. And when they come to fight him, he fights back.

I don’t think it was a “the Isles are soft” type thing – it’s just that’s the way the Avs want to play against everyone. Heck, earlier this year, they out-Bostoned Boston. O’Byrne even laid CHARA out.

I’m not saying it’s that way against other teams, but I can assure you than when it comes to the Avs defense abusing people, the Isles are far from alone. When the Avs are on their game, that’s just the way they play. We have the biggest top 6 blueline in the NHL – this is what they do.

Just a Colorado girl in Montana who ♥s the Avs.
Varly: you're awesome. We love you. Please don't break.

by andidee15 on Nov 12, 2011 12:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Statistics for mikb

Thanks for throwing a bunch of stats out that say nothing.
In the first place, the Pittsburgh moment was 2/2/11, when the Isles lost 3-0 and Comeau was run and DP fought with Johnson, which is the game the Isles said enough is enough. It was not the 9-3 game. In the 3 months before 2/211, the Isles record was Nov 1-10, Dec. 6-8, Jan 4-9. And you say the Isles were already turning their season around? Not so much.
In the rest of Feb after 2/2/11, their record was 7-5. Thats turning their season around.
Now for your take on the 9-3 game. Go back and look at the box score. Haley took a roughing penalty 2 minutes into the game, and the first Isle goal came at 8 minutes. 1-0. 2 minutes later, Haley fought Adams. Isles score again a couple of minutes later, 2-0. Isles score again, 3-0, and then right after that Gillies fought Goddard. And after that fight, Grabner scored. 4-0 at the end of one, 2 fights, a roughing penalty, and many hits. Thats all in the first period. But to you, the Isles did not send a message then, I guess.
Thanks for your attempt at revisionist history.

by JackandAce on Nov 11, 2011 9:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Point being

the big part of the brawls ended up being after the game was out of hand. If the big brawls don’t happen, that game is a blowout with two fights and nobody says that the Isles made a statement. Is Haley fighting Adams and Gillies fighting Godard a “statement”? Of course not…shit got out of hand after the game was a blowout. Otherwise, you saw one surprise fight, and one staged “Godard trying to change momentum” fight.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 11, 2011 9:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes it was

Of course it was a statement…from the opening minute. Go back and read all of the Islander comments after game about standing up for one another. It was not Pitt who came out hitting, it was the Islanders.

by JackandAce on Nov 12, 2011 6:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Okay, I guess we'll just have a difference of opinion then

Because to me, they didn’t look to be that much different (in terms of physical play)early in that game early other than the fact that they were putting the puck in the net frequently. And it’s not like I haven’t seen Gillies/Haley/Adams or Godard fight before.

I remember it that the game started getting chippy as the Isles piled it on (Letang/Tavares boarding slash) and some other stuff that the Isles responded to. I don’t feel that they initiated physical play and fights to achieve a 9-3 outcome…I feel like the 9-3 outcome led to a lot of chippiness that they needed to respond to.

On a whole, I feel that game was a statement, but prior to the line brawls, not so much. I understand that the players talked about sticking up for each other, and I believe they did, but to me, “sticking up for each other” implies that they are fighting against some perceived wrong that was initiated by the other team (in this case, during this game). TO me, Haley/Adams and Gillies/Godard does not accomplish that end.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 12, 2011 8:51 AM EST up reply actions  

From December 16-February 1 they were 11-9-3. Season already turned around.

No revisions, just reality.

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 9:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Stats

So you go to Dec., find the first game the Isles win in the middle of the month and count from there. Selective use of statistics, my friend.
So OK, from Dec. 16 through Feb 2 (the game things changed), the Isles were 11 wins 12 losses. Go look it up (if I randomly pick Dec. 11 as my starting point, their record is 11 and 14).
And then for the rest of Feb. they were 7 wins and 5 losses.
I would say things changed after the 3-0 loss. I would say they utilized a new attitude and game plan that helped them. Is that enough to carry them through the rest of the season alone? Of course not…they clearly were also not as skilled as other teams.
But when the used physical play as part of their game, it benefited them.

by JackandAce on Nov 12, 2011 7:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes

Actually, if I go to March 11 instead of the end of Feb., the Islanders were 11-7. Even better to my point, which was that once the Islanders played with a decided physical edge, they were rewarded. And as I said, that would not be enough alone to make all the difference. Lack of depth and skill will eventually catch up. And it did.
That does not negate the point that 1. Today the Isles do not have a physical edge and 2. That their recent history should show them that they benefit when they have it.
We both can use stats selectively.

by JackandAce on Nov 12, 2011 7:56 AM EST up reply actions  

And we lost 7 of 8 to end the year and had fights and/or misconducts in 6 of them, so I guess even more recent history tells us they don’t benefit at all from that.

I’m not denying the 9-3 game was a big moment for the team, but it’s a bigger moment for the fans. The team had already started to find it’s footing long before that, namely as an explosive offensive team. When that returns, so will the wins.

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 12, 2011 9:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Lets then keep going

Arbitrarily speaking, of course…lets take a sample of 12 games leading up to and including the 3-0 loss to Pitt and the 12 games after:
Isles were 3-9 in the first 12
They were 7-5 in the next 12
And that is a close sample of the games right around the time you say it had less impact on the team than it did the fans
Arbitrarily speaking, of course

by JackandAce on Nov 12, 2011 9:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Being tough and gritty

You know what is not tough, or gritty? Profanities. Its the last refuge for those with no points to make. Not very impressive.
You clearly have no memory of what that 9-3 game was like. The Islanders came out from the opening minute playing physical. They dictated play from the beginning.
And it is exactly the point. Your memory and the boxscore should tell you that.

by JackandAce on Nov 12, 2011 7:22 AM EST up reply actions  

memory is a cheat sometimes

I find being called a liar more insulting than a cuss word. And the last refuge of someone with no points to make is to call names. And when that doesn’t work, pretend it was all that guy’s fault and talk about the tone of the argument instead of the substance.

As far as giving Haley credit for sparking the team with a penalty… that is your memory playing tricks on you. How many games in the league every year have a penalty before any goals are scored? If Pitt pots a PP goal there we’re not talking “sparking the team” anymore, or “dictating play,” we’re talking “dumb early penalty puts us in a hole again.”

In other words – as I have contended for the entire thread – results tend to color our memory of events. We think the Isles played badly in the third against Colorado – but if two things that were not in anyone’s control happen slightly differently, they win 3-1 and we think they did a great job containing Colorado when they finally got going. This whole thread would have been about resilience and not letting the 5-on-3 goal at the end of the second ruin the game, and “shutting the door” and blahdiblah.

I do remember what that 9-3 game was like, but I also realize that in general, it’s a bad idea to take penalties by being over-aggressive. That’s not how it worked out that one time; much more often it hurts the club and then where are we?

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 12, 2011 2:14 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I'll agree with this

If you had asked me after the second period, I would have said the physical play was adequate and we responded to the hit on JT etc. And I’ll bet if you went back and looked through that monstrosity of a game thread, nobody really complained about the Isles in that fashion until the third.

I don’t know if you can say the Isles don’t bring it, can’t bring it, won’t bring it, haven’t brought it for 20/40/60, or that they did bring it and lost (on the scoreboard and in the physicality department). But agreed, when the score is different, the perception of what caused that score to be different is umm…different.

For example, I very rarely think that physical play “caused” a win unless I see something like a crushing hit that puts a puck right on a guys stick for a goal.

What I think happens is that “TEH TUFFNEZZ” (size/physical play) was identified as a team weakness early on and when we lose, everyone goes back to it. But truth be told, we really haven’t had too many losses against teams you would call physical (Florida 2x, Tampa, Washington, Winnipeg) And even both Pittsburgh games weren’t really physical.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 11, 2011 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh it’s already been broughten.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Me either

because nobody said that it doesn’t. But you know what else works is skating…which this team doesn’t do a lot of the time. But we are talking specifically about last night right? Did you look through the game thread? Did anyone complain about the physicality until maybe the third period?

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 11, 2011 9:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Toughness and physcial play

is more than hitting. It’s hold your position in front of the crease, it defense men standing up forwards at the blue line and forwards going into the corners and coming away with the puck. The Islanders are failing in all three areas right now. Lack of size? maybe, but more likely a lack of heart. This is a team built on speed and finesse, but we have the guy’s to balance it out if they would just play to those capabilities. KO,Martin,Hamonic,Striet and Bailey just to name a few..

Back....
had to take a Campbell and wipe my Bettman.

by skeeterman on Nov 11, 2011 9:54 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Yes, I'm aware of that

but the last bunch of statements (that I am responding to) refer back to this

We have not had a physical presence at all this season, other than one guy (Martin), and yeah, Hamonic. Two guys. Let me go back to the Cup years and list all the players who played with grit (as defined by hitting, checking, and/or once in a while fighting):

and

Hitting creates space and makes the opposing players look over their shoulders…They cant just skate freely all relaxed anymore…

I also wasn’t disagreeing that it’s important or that the Isles don’t do enough of it. My point was, it tends to be brought up more in losses than in wins whether it was the root cause of a loss or not. In the end of it, I don’t believe that the losses to the Panthers and Lightning had to do with the “physical” play, it had to do with poor play in general. Against the Bruins, I can agree they got smacked around.

But when you’re skating, (and hitting), it’s tougher to BE hit…and people wouldn’t complain as much about the boys getting manhandled.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 11, 2011 10:15 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I can agree with that

I may have misread a bit. thought someone was implying that we needed to hit more just for intimidation purposes.

Back....
had to take a Campbell and wipe my Bettman.

by skeeterman on Nov 11, 2011 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, they are

It just isn’t me. I feel like the biggest missing physical factor is “going to the net” and being willing to take some abuse down there. I’m working on a post now on hitting, and it turns out, we’ve only been outhit five times so far…and often, not in the games you would think it should be.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 12, 2011 11:01 AM EST up reply actions  

They keep losing!!!

So there has to be a reason and this is a HUGE problem…

by KO21 on Nov 14, 2011 5:34 PM EST up reply actions  

The reason could be a million things. I’d start with our players not being as talented.

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 14, 2011 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

seriously??

idk…Were u feeling this way during the off season???Just wondering…

by KO21 on Nov 14, 2011 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

On defense?

Absolutely.

I didn’t think the bottom 6 would be so bad, but I didn’t know Pandolfo and Rolston would be involved.

Obviously you couldn’t predict the second line issues, but I also think those are going to right themselves at some point and we’ll win more games. The problem is that we are thin talent-wise and if everyone isn’t at the top of their game, it will be hard for us to win. Obviously they aren’t always going to be firing on all cylinders…

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 14, 2011 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

When they were hemmed in their own zone I was sitting there frustrated that they weren't finishing checks to regain the puck...

Tere was no complaining because we were on offense…No need to check anyone when you’re in possession of the puck…So I still don’t get the point here

by KO21 on Nov 12, 2011 5:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Me either

You started arguing with me about a point I never made or attempted to make. I’m not disagreeing with you that physicality has a place in the game. I am saying that I think it is often erroneously brought to the forefront by scoring problems.

Also, I doubt that we were on offense the entire first and second periods. Especially considering the shot totals by period were 12-9 and 19-14 Avs. So that argument really doesn’t fly either. We happened to score more goals early, so you are associating the score with “offense” while the SOG and Corsi possession metrics look like crap. http://timeonice.com/shots1112.php?gamenumber=20218

In the first, the Avs outhit the Isles 12-3, in the second it was, 5-5 and in the third, 11-4 and 1-0 in OT. For a 29-12 advantage. http://www.nhl.com/ice/icetracker.htm?id=2011020218

The point is, it was a problem in the first too, and nobody was complaining about it because the Isles were up 1-0 and 3-0 by the end of the second…but clearly, they were being outhit at that point in the game…and the scoreboard didn’t reflect that the Avs hitting was having an impact on their game at that point. I guess you could cite that it was a “cumulative” effect and that by the third period the Isles were beaten down, but there’d be no way to prove that other than by associating the score with what you’re saying.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 12, 2011 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

The point is it would if

NIk Lidstrom was doing it…or Amac was doing it like he was last year. There is more than one way to get there. Either by speed, talent, positioning or hitting. Asking Eaton to hit after 15 years of him not doing that and at his age is not going to happen…and wouldn’t need to if he was doing what he used to do well.

And I’m not sure why I keep responding to your points since you seem to alter them every post. Again, I agree with you that physicality is important, but it is not the be all/end all of what this team needs to be about. Especially considering that right now, nobody is even positionally close enough to hit anybody.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 14, 2011 6:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I never altered my points or backed away from my opinion which is...

The lack of physicality is what typifies this teams struggles…They lack fire, IMHO…When guys are being physical they are into the game…Then again…I dont think its an opinion…Even Cappy has been saying it…They don’t play physical when they need too be…Most NHL people would agree that checking is needed…This isn’t a rec league, bor…This is the NHL, lol…It is one of the most physical and dare I say “violent” of pro-sports…I said we should agree to disagree….Sorry to bring up this topic again…Ive been away a few days…

by KO21 on Nov 14, 2011 6:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I just noticed u said that u agree there needs to be phyocality but

its the end all be all of this teams problems…I guess so but Its at the heart of the problem. imho…They have no heart so far…They have no fire so far….I hope it comes from somewhere…Playing like its rec or pond hockey wont bring it…

by KO21 on Nov 14, 2011 7:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Hitting doesn't create space. You're thinking of football. To create space for a teammate who is carrying

the puck you’d have to bang into a player on the other team who doesn’t have the puck. You would be called for interference immediately. Crashing the net creates space because the other team will rarely leave an offensive player alone in front of the net – its too dangerous so it draws a defender to him and leaves the puck carrier with more space. That’s not hitting, that’s just skating hard to the net without the puck. I don’t know where the idea that hitting ‘creates space’ in hockey came from but its not true. Hitting does make the players on the other team rush passes which creates turnovers and playing the body in one on one situations leaves a defender much less vulnerable to being dangled (like Kane did to Hamonic (who loves to hit BTW)).

by TMS on Nov 11, 2011 10:50 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Hitting opens space

-Hitting takes opposing players out of plays
-Hitting makes opponents shy away from pucks when physical players are near
-Hitting forces opposing players to usually play things differently
-Hitting creates/forces turnovers
-Hitting forces opponents to make decisions early

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 12, 2011 11:13 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

A response on this

-Hitting takes opposing players out of plays
     * Also takes the hitter out of the play

-Hitting makes opponents shy away from pucks when physical players are near
     * Agreed

-Hitting forces opposing players to usually play things differently
     * Agreed

-Hitting creates/forces turnovers
     * The puck is just as likely to be picked up by an offense or defensive guy…this has more to do with the rest of the team’s positioning.

-Hitting forces opponents to make decisions early
     * Agreed

What really opens space is the whole act of hitting. When a hit is made along the boards, you are basically playing four on four hockey for a second or two. I’ll bet it is just as likely to be scored on as it is to score. I wonder if anybody has ever tracked that because it is an interesting debate.

I also wonder if there are more goals scored off of “hits” or “rushed plays” where the person “anticipates” a big hit. The psych factor does loom large there.

One other thing, when I was playing defense in a non-hitting league, I often felt rushed just from pressure and the fear of turning the puck over or getting it taken from me. That had to do with speed and “who was a better hockey player” than me. I could easily see someone “rushing” just as much because Grabner and St. Louis were forechecking them as they would for Clutterbuck and Martin…often moreso for the goal scorers.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 12, 2011 11:41 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Good points

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 12, 2011 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly

I know people don’t know me on this site, so you’ll just have to take my word, but I have never been a “doom and gloomer.” If anything, I have been too much of an optimist. I have recently been convinced that this team cannot truly move forward with Wang as the owner.

Let me explain why. Think about the following decisions.

1. Hiring Garth Snow as GM (although I think Snow has done an admirable job considering the financial and other restraints implemented by Wang – Do you think it’s Snow’s idea to have such an appalling lack of toughness in the lineup?).

2. Rick’s 15 year contract

3. Hiring Capuano without a search of the talent available outside the organization

4. Getting rid of Konopka, who was clearly the leader of last year’s team with Weight out. Does anyone doubt that Konopka was the mastermind behind the Pittsburgh game last year? I know, I know, the goal song, but other than that…

5. Not having Haley in the lineup.

6. Taking away Chris Botta’s credentials.

7. Dumping Billy Jaffe.

8. Leaving a budding superstar protected by only one person after seeing what happened last year.

OK, I have probably missed some, and some are not as important as the others. Answer me this: what other team makes those decisions? Nobody. Not one team would do those things. The problem is not Snow. I don’t think he’s the best GM we could have hired at the time, but I think that he has done a good job under the circumstances. The problem is not Capuano, although again I think we could have hired a better coach. The problem is Wang.

by Peter Karamazov on Nov 11, 2011 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

The title says it all.

=d

by AP77 on Nov 11, 2011 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Nov 11, 2011 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

...who the hell is Osborne?

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 3:36 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

we must have drafted him and Dio in the eighth and ninth rounds

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 3:40 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Yeah that would violate some rules I'm sure. Now Spiderman would be perfect because his superhuman

agility and quickness would be perfectly legal. Of course he wouldn’t be able to spin his webs during game play but his other attributes would make him a perrenial Hart trophy candidate.

by TMS71 on Nov 11, 2011 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

only drawback

He’d have a constant migraine from his Spider-Sense going off every time someone shot the puck at DiPietro.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 5:17 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Good points

You’re right about each number. However, are there other teams that have, say, more than 2 or 3 of those things happen?

One thing that I forgot to mention are how it seems as if some decisions are made for personal reasons. I don’t want to keep harping on ZK, but I think the decision to let him go is emblematic of everything else I’ve tried to say. Here you have a player who wins faceoffs like nobody’s business, stands up for his teammates, wants to play here at a time when attracting players is not easy, and is not a defensive liability. I realize I have no proof for this, but it seems to me that the only reason not to bring him back is because he pissed off someone.

In a video on IPB, Jaffe talked about the Islanders not having an identity. After the Pittsburgh game, they had an identity. They were going to stand up for each other. The fans were really excited for the first time in…how long?

Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t think Snow didn’t understand why that was. I don’t think Capuano didn’t understand why that was. That only leaves one person.

BTW, thanks for the response. It’s refreshing to see real discussion and not name calling.

by Peter Karamazov on Nov 11, 2011 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Konopka was a penalty magnet

Stupid ones he took on his own and plenty that the officials were not willing to give him a pass on because he clearly got under their skin. Similar to what the Rangers experience with Avery, the guy can’t sneeze without receiving a trip to the box. From a hockey perspective, I believe Snow thought he could bring in Reasoner to fill this role, but a lot of the passion was lost. This team is still young and I think “Brother Zeke” was a real positive influence on them.

by GreekIsles83 on Nov 11, 2011 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I mentioned this elsewhere in here but I'll repost

The Pittsburgh game didn’t really give them an identity – it was a confirmation of the identity they already had. By the W-L record, they were pretty much exactly the same team the second third of the year as they were the final third (with the 9-3 win being the last game of the second third). They had a huge lead before the “identity” emerged. It got the fans pumped, but so did Grabs’ scoring binge and Hamonic’s excellent debut and Poulin and Montoya being so strong in nets. In short, it really was winning that made people optimistic about this season, hoping to build on that success. Zeke, for all his merits, wasn’t the only thing they had going for them; he was just as involved during the 1-17-3 streak.

To add to this, I’d say that it was great to have Zeke winning all those faceoffs, but he frequently was lost after that. He was a defensive liability. Worse, he led the league in fighting majors and PIM overall, which meant that his one major skill – faceoffs – were often unavailable when the Isles really needed him most.

Great in the room is all well and good, but great on the rink is an essential upgrade. I think that the Isles didn’t think the clubhouse would be hurting for direction with a respected captain like Streit, vocal guys like Parenteau, and strong homegrown talent like Tavares and Okposo (as well as fan faves in Moulson and Grabner). They shouldn’t be. I even contend that they probably aren’t, despite the early results.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure
are there other teams that have, say, more than 2 or 3 of those things happen?

Haha, I’m not sure, but I’d wager that’s when you know you’re an Islanders fan! (Or Blues fan, I painfully know too well.)

The vibe you’re talking about … I honestly don’t know how much is Wang and how much is Snow. The very personal, loyalty-style of management, that must come from Wang but there is an element of “keep it in the family” with Snow, for sure. I guess but have no way of knowing that’s a reaction to his experience as a player with Milbury running the asylum.

Konopka’s an interesting case because he was popular with the fans and he was a big personality, but … did you ever get uncomfortable that he was maybe TOO big a personality for his role? I think enforcers, much like Gervais and Mottau in the community, tend to realize their holds on jobs are tenuous and so do a lot of external affairs stuff that makes people like them more than is commensurate to their actual on-ice value to the team.

Personally, I’ll be more disappointed if the remaining Islanders didn’t take Zenon “identity” lessons to heart. I figured that was the purpose of his one-year stay here.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Nov 12, 2011 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

did you ever get uncomfortable that he was maybe TOO big a personality for his role?

I did! The day he yelled up to the TSN crew about not being doormats was cool and all, and I remember thinking that stuff like that is contagious, but I also remember thinking to myself “man, for a guy not likely to effect the outcome of the game…”

The Isles went on that night to lose to Ottawa 6-4. I think I loved it more because I felt like it was referencing them taking physical beatings, but when you lose that game, it kind of makes you look silly.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 12, 2011 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm way late to this party...

But what in the holy hell does taking away Botta’s credentials have to do with anything that happens to the Islanders on the ice? Unless he can forecheck, score regularly or work the point on the power play, I see no reason why this would affect the Islanders’ win-loss record under Charles Wang.

Mr. Wang’s made some terrible team-hampering decisions in his time, usually the handing out unfathomably long contracts. But keeping one blogger out of the locker room for whatever the reason isn’t one of them. Not everybody’s on board. I get that. But Botta’s presence is not something that the team gives a rat’s ass about. As it should be.

"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science

by PGI on Nov 11, 2011 11:47 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Enough is enough

The officiating, while it doesn’t cost the Isles every game, certainly is way above biased.
I know, I know, its all been said before, yada yada yada. But for example, last night I had my cousin over to watch the game. He’s modest hockey fan at best. Even HE commented to me about the BS calls going against the Isles. How many blown calls is it gonna take for the NHL to step in and start making these idiots accountable? I don’t want to hear “how tough a job” it is for them anymore. GET THE DAMN CALL RIGHT. Seriously, one penalty that just baffled me was the phantom call against Pandolfo in the 1st for hooking Duschene. WTF?? He wasn’t even near the guy!! How does a referee not see this?? And if he CAN’T see it, why is he on the ice to begin with Start making refs accountable for doing THEIR job, RIGHT.

ok, done with rant, who wants coffee??

Isles rule, rangers suck... that's just how it is.

by Timtropolis on Nov 11, 2011 8:16 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

- as if you need to have any MORE stimulation, Tim? LOL

In memoriam: Virginia Ariel Cayon 1927-2011 R.I.P. Mom

by ogam5 on Nov 11, 2011 8:54 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

LOL!!

you get a rec for actually making me “lol” for real !! co-workers are wondering why I’m laughing

Isles rule, rangers suck... that's just how it is.

by Timtropolis on Nov 11, 2011 9:28 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I am so glad I fell asleep midway through the third

The last thing I remembered was a little after it was 3-3….

I don’t like to criticize sports officials (being one, I understand how tough it can be), but c’mon, the Rolston penalty was beyond a joke and the way penalties were called – when Colorado roughed us up, we wind up giving them even strength or a power play? What’s wrong with this picture?

I did get to see a three-and-a-half minute COZO where, unless I was hallucinating, Comeau went up to the press box, got a cold one, and then skated around the goal, went into Wyoming, and then went around to the face off dot.

It’s getting to the critical time. Not necessarily win every game critical but they have to finish off opponents when they have them beat and win the winnable ones. Get the loser points when they have to claw back.

by martylnd on Nov 11, 2011 8:28 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

You weren't hallucinating, that actually happened.

But you must have dozed off when stopped at the Habitat for Humanity work site in northeast Utah. Being late, it was closed, so he just sort of froze the puck for a second, did a quick check around the premises and then left a note saying he brought his hammer and awesome mustache and will be back tomorrow.

by Les Beaver on Nov 11, 2011 9:14 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I figured

Utah closes early on Thursdays.

by martylnd on Nov 11, 2011 9:27 AM EST up reply actions  

That's what kills me
I don’t like to criticize sports officials (being one, I understand how tough it can be), but c’mon

I really, really don’t like to harp on the refs either, and I hate the conspiracy feeling. Sometimes it’s just so bad that you can’t avoid it. I wish they’d won last night just so I could really unleash a rant about every moment of insanity without just sounding like a bitter sore loser.

Maybe every team gets screwed, but the Isles’ margin for error is so thin that when they get screwed it really stands out.

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Nov 11, 2011 3:20 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

How the hell can you embarrass a team for 30-35 minutes and then completely shut down and lose. I know the refs were watching a different game, but come on! It was their’s for the taking. All those clean passes right thru the Avs crease from the corner to the opposite point. Constantly beating them to the puck. Running them around shift after shift. Holy crap. I’m still scratching my head. When am I gonna see a 60 friggin minute game? The final period took away all the good stuff I saw. There was a lot of it, but it doesn’t matter now.
PS – Was it the tv audio or was that arena really quiet? And Jiggs, God love him. Its so good to hear his voice now and again, but I think his age is catching up with him. He’s still the man, anyway.

by Icefan71 on Nov 11, 2011 9:25 AM EST reply actions  

The Twilight Zone for Islanders fans.

“There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man.
It is a dimension as vast as space and timeless as infinity.
It is the middle ground between light and shadow,
between science and superstition,
and it lies between the pit of man’s fears and the summit of his knowledge.
This is the dimension of imagination.
It is an area which we call . . . the Twilight Zone.”

There is a 6th dimension, only known to Islanders fans.
(FIll in the blank)

by BattFist on Nov 11, 2011 9:29 AM EST reply actions  

If DP cost us the game with a stupid OT penalty like Montoya did, people would call for him to be hung.

It must be said. Although Montoya arguably kept us in the game (?, was that 3rd goal a little soft? It seemed a little to me but I wasn’t sure if it changed direction off a stick), he literally cost us the game. You just don’t flirt with taking a penalty in OT, it’s essentially game over with a 4 vs 3. And Montoya did it twice, the time the puck was in our end the play before that Montoya was holding/holding-the-stick on an avs player that the refs let him get away and later obviously he hit an avs player with the butt of his stick, soft or not it’s callable. How would you have felt if Giguere smacked Grabs in the face with the butt of his stick? Montoya lost his top in a close game and it cost us, simple as that. Was he the main reason we lost? No, but was the the nail that sealed the coffin? Yes.

That said, great play early on from most player and crappy tired/lost play later on. You just can’t play tired against a team with great skaters that get physical like the avs. It will and did cost us. 1 win in our last 9gms, wow. It would at least be livable record if we played mostly top teams, but losses to the Jets, Avalanche, Bruins, and Panthers(on a hot start that I don’t think will last). What the heck?

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 9:51 AM EST reply actions   2 recs

Good points, but you can't put the Bruins in that group.

They are basically Stanley cup champs playing with a hangover…and they seem to have righted the ship a couple games before we played them. With that said, it was a soft call on El Toyota, he was getting run at all night, but yes, he could have gotten called for grabbing the Avs stick —eventually he took a penalty. Overall though, we folded in the 3rd, but the refs screwed us on at least 4 calls that i remember. Blatantly screwed.

by NewIsles on Nov 11, 2011 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes and no. I wouldn't call the bruins bad, but to say that an elite record breaking performance by thomas was the reason the Bruins wouldn't be off base.

They are probably still a playoff team, but I don’t see them winning another cup without thomas playing great in the playoffs again. But you’re right they shouldn’t be considered a slouch.

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

If DP did what Monty did Isles fans would be all over him....

Thats because DP makes it a habit…If MONTY makes more mistakes he will be on the scape wagon just as fast as anyone….

by KO21 on Nov 11, 2011 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree, but DP hasn't done anything this year to warrant it. Nabokov kind of did on that 1st/2nd goal against the Bruins, and Montoya did with playing with fire here with the penalties.

So say, Nabokov has a “DP bad decision moment” every 4-5gms, Montoya has a “DP bad decision moment” every 4-5gms, and DP has a “DP bad decision moment” every 4-5gms. All in which the goalie “costs” us a loss. Is that reason enough to blame DP more then the other 2 goalies because of his past performance last year? I don’t think so, but it’s gonna happen. All the haters have been waiting for that, and it hasn’t happened to DP yet, but it’s happened to Montoya last game in OT and it arguably happened to Nabby in the Bruins gm where he flopped around on that 1 goal somewhat aimlessly. That’s what I wanted to say.

He was still great in net before that, but all it ever takes is 1 stupid mistake for a goalie to go from a tie game to a loss or a win to a tie.

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

You are right

Some times a goalie has to win a game when its on the line.
Just waiting for one of our goalies to do it.

by JackandAce on Nov 11, 2011 10:03 AM EST reply actions  

#1 Goalie performance...

I’m sorry, has Montoya not shown he’s the number one yet?
47/51 saves. The first crack was on a 5-on-3 PK and the fourth was on a 4-on-3 OT PK.
Montoya has definitely earned #1 status with this team. He should get the start in Vancouver, and barring a collapse the first home start as well.
As far as winning a game… the breakaway save in OT was pretty neat. Maybe a defensman who can clear screens wins that game for them.
Maybe Jurcina instead of Mottau…
Just sayin’.

LighthouseHockey: We saw this coming!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Nov 11, 2011 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes

To me Montoya is number one. I will not be happy if he does not get the next 2 or more starts.
He made some good saves, but some times you just have to win the game for the team. Those last two goals were not good.
But he still failed last night. No excuses.

by JackandAce on Nov 11, 2011 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, JP, the first home game back

My first ever Isles home game…. Woooh Hoooooo!!

"We can't get pushed around," Haley said. "What commentators say about us, that's their job. My job is to try and limit as many people who want to take liberties with our guys as possible."

by BobbyNystromOwnsYou on Nov 11, 2011 10:38 AM EST up reply actions  

What are the chances

that Wang hands Garth an open signed checkbook and let’s him go all Burkish on the refereeing?

I didn’t see the game and the highlights don’t show anything about the reffing, so I can’t comment. I thought Montoya let in a couple of soft ones and his penalty, in a vacuum, was just silly.

I do agree that there is something to be said for the management taking a stand if they feel the Isles are being jobbed by the referees. Bad reffing can definitely take a toll on a fragile team’s psyche. It might be worth a $50,000 fine.

STOP effin' messin' with my FnGO!!

by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Nov 11, 2011 10:06 AM EST reply actions  

happy Heavy Metal Day!!

"We can't get pushed around," Haley said. "What commentators say about us, that's their job. My job is to try and limit as many people who want to take liberties with our guys as possible."

by BobbyNystromOwnsYou on Nov 11, 2011 10:52 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I really wish I could have enjoyed it as such.

Unfortunately, I spent the day at a wake. :(

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Nov 12, 2011 1:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it any more!

This game is about RESPECT — from opposing players, from referees, but most of all — SELF respect.
I can tell you exactly what O’Brien said during that timeout:

“Hey, guys! These are the f—-ing NY Islanders, the worst team in the league. If we lose to them, we really suck! All we gotta do is get physical with them (like Boston), and they’ll turtle like Talbot. We can run their goalie, we can mug their star player. No problem. Nobody’s gonna retaliate (except Martin, and he’s not that big). So let’s go out there and kick some ass!”

If I could afford it, I’d put a full-page ad in Newsday saying: “Hey Islanders! Grow a Pair!”

At this point, the coach should say, “I don’t care if we win or lose, so long as we give our best effort, and so long as we don’t leave the ice with our tails between our legs.”

by Bryan's Pop on Nov 11, 2011 10:24 AM EST reply actions  

Do you think the Av's just took us too softly early on and saw we were for real and turned it on?

I’m not sure if it was that or the isles tiring themselves out too early into the game.

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Half-assing the Rebuild

This team has so much dead weight on it it’s ridiculous. Isn’t the point of this rebuild to get experience for the young guys? So of course, who’s out there 4-3 in OT? Eaton, Pandolfo, Staois!!! So not only did they lose, no one useful gained any experience in that situation…

It’s all lipserve…

by maydog927 on Nov 11, 2011 10:36 AM EST reply actions  

Ugh

I’d hate to have to agree, when you’re on a 4-on-3 in OT maybe it’s a better idea to play your best PK’ers, including your best centerman and your best defenders. That was a poor coaching decision on Cappy.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Why do you hate to agree? This board is so elistist; anyone with a different POV is considered an outcast…

by maydog927 on Nov 11, 2011 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Uh....

/drops monocle

Maybe because I don’t think the rebuild is being half-assed?

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Methinks you are misinterpreting

I think he is just sharing your lament, and finds it regrettable that the situation exists to be lamented…

Success was survival and, kid, it still is

by IslesFanInNJ on Nov 11, 2011 11:19 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Yes, we are the elistists!

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Nov 11, 2011 3:22 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

1% here

go eat cake.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 11, 2011 3:51 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

we win this game if just 1 thing happens

Grabner finishes on a breakaway

also, dom said that the T/O we took was after the 2nd goal, but i remember it being after the 3rd goal… am i wrong?

These comments crawl up from the depths of the deepest Chasm of Saar

by bob l on Nov 11, 2011 11:24 AM EST reply actions  

completely

his stache made him miss both times

These comments crawl up from the depths of the deepest Chasm of Saar

by bob l on Nov 11, 2011 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Did grabs have 2 yesterday?

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

"one on the pk"?

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

duh

Montoya lost this game, plain and simple

other than that, we should have beat this sleepwalking Avalanche team

DP starts & beats Vancouver on Sunday – bet on it

by Cary K on Nov 11, 2011 11:44 AM EST reply actions   2 recs

Oh dip

Never saw that one coming, weren’t you a DP hater not to long ago?

Constantly building for the future.

by pgat28 on Nov 11, 2011 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Careevaluator

Sorry, this is going to be my new thing. Hope it’s not offensive…but I can’t help it!

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 11, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

How about Carydomus?

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Let's hope so

I want to wait for proof. The thing about Nostra is that he was right…I’m sure back in the day most of his people were like STFU Nos nobody cares whats gonna happen in 2000 years for the love of God.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 11, 2011 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

what a shock!

montoya and tavares get run at and bowled over all night. and the only guy that does anything about it is a yound 22 year old middleweight guy who is still trying to learn his way himself. its pathetic to put that all on martin and have noone else who has absolutely any toughness.

this team is a joke and deserve what they are getting, period.

by ripcurl2121 on Nov 11, 2011 11:50 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, making Martin that guy sucks, but we have no other option.

Gillies “might” do something if he was up and saw that. Martin did his job though. The guy tied him up too quick and hugged him. Martin should have just started throwing on him the second he squared off. Although the cross check to the guys chest was nice to see.

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

People bitch when Gillies is on the 4th line, shortening the bench and playing only 4 minutes a night.

Then, people bitch when Gillies is in Bridgeport and the team is soft.

Fans can’t have it both ways. Pick one or the other. Jesus.

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 1:22 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Probably different fans

arguing different points of view. I doubt anyone wants both…

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 1:28 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Copy/Paste for the next few games...................

Cappy: "give credit to them, they worked hard." HOW COMeW OUR GUYS DID NOT IN THE THIRD PERIOD?
Cappy: "its’ unfortunate the guys were not rewarded for their effort." THE GUYS WERE REWARDED FOR THEIR EFFORT (or lack there of in the 3rd)
PAP: "for some reason we stopped playing our game, unacceptable at this level to blow a lead like that" UNACCEPTABLE? AT THIS LEVEL? THEN WHY DID IT HAPPEN?
Bailey: "there is no excuse, we dominated for 40 minutes." YEAH FOR 40 MINS, LAST TIME I CHECKED THE GAME IS 60 MINS LONG!
Eaton: "we sat back got away from the things that made us successful." "We got too passive and tried to sit on a lead." WE GOT AWAY FROM THE THINGS THAT MADE US SUCCESSFUL? WHY? We tried to sit on a lead, WHY?

This team just does not get IT, they do not seem to understand that a total 60 min team effort is required for every game.

Rest assured that we will hear these same post game interviews for the foreseeable future!

We are all Islanders, even if we’re from Jersey!

by Russel Ginart on Nov 11, 2011 12:17 PM EST reply actions  

Salary Floor Implications??

Could anyone explain if there are or any implications in regards to the salary cap and floor if the Isles wavie some players? I know, because he’s over 35, Rolston’s salary still counts. But what about guys like Mottau, Eaton, Pandalfo and Staios. I am under the impression that if you waive those 4 guys and bring up, say, Haley, Wishart, Reese and Player X from Bridgeport, the BP guys won’t equal the 4 guys you waiver in terns of salary and thus the Isles will be under the floor. Doesn’t it make sense to trade for salary (in the case of last nights ‘deal’ of Nabby for Tuttin (sp?)) than it does to call up guys? Am I wrong? I know the trades are easier said than done, but what else can be done if you just wavie a few million in salary and only replace it with a couple hundred grand??

by barry_hal_oliver_24 on Nov 11, 2011 12:31 PM EST reply actions  

You can check out

all of the numbers at capgeek.

It largely depends on the swap. For example, Mottau for Wishart would make virtually no change. But Haley replacing Pandalfo would cut almost $1 million.

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

it gets complicated

The floor and the ceiling apply to the actual payouts, and aren’t just the sum total of the team’s contracts.

For example, if the team is one million above the floor, they can’t waive a $2 M guy and bring up a league-minimum ($500K) guy…. at least not right away. But fast-forward to game 28. You’ve just finished one-third of the season. Now you CAN make that move. Why? Because you’ve paid Mr. Two Mil $666,667 of his salary for the year, and you owe Mr. Minimum $333,333. That equals $1 M, and that means that the total salary paid out will get you to the league’s minimum.

This is the same reason why a team close to the ceiling can’t add an expensive player early in the year, but can do it at the deadline, when there’s much less salary owing to that player.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

OK, but now...

….what happens when Nino comes back? Does his salary count for the cap NOW or when he’s activated? The Isles want to stay pretty close to the floor and my guess is Pandalfo is the guy who goes: Signed in camp as a filler, his salary is the ‘closest’ to Nino’s so once he’s gone their still near the floor. But then everyone wants to bring up Haley. So activate Nino, drop Pandalfo, bring up Haley, send down/wavie……??

by barry_hal_oliver_24 on Nov 11, 2011 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Nino's salary already counts

He is part of the 23-man active roster while he’s on rehab.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 12:58 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Hey mike

Why isn’t Staios’ contract considered a 35+? He’s 38, and signed this year…is this just an error on capgeek’s part?
http://capgeek.com/players/display.php?id=32

Same with Pandolfo?http://capgeek.com/players/display.php?id=788

Do not get it…shrugs shoulders.

Is it because they are one year deals or something?

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 11, 2011 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Shit

nevermind…should’ve read further.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 11, 2011 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Only Rolston

is a 35+ contract. They have to be multiyear to count, and they both have one year deals.

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Right now

I think we are about 1.9 million over the floor (Nino already counts). Nino is 2.7, so if he were to go back to juniors, we’d need someone making 800K or better to come up (Ullstrom).

But if Nino stays we have some wiggle room to replace Pandolfo and Staios, and as mikb pointed out above, it doesn’t translate exactly since their contracts partially count already.

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

So then....

….wouldn’t it makes sense to trade Nabby for a pick instead of a player? Trading Nabby for the pick, frees up a roster spot and only costs $500K+ to move him off your cap.

by barry_hal_oliver_24 on Nov 11, 2011 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Really

I think they’re trying to keep money on the books, not take it off, so they can be flexible with callups.

Tavares is Tavares.

by afrosupreme on Nov 11, 2011 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

This shit is pathetic...

We make moves based on staying just above the salary floor instead of based on making the team better in order win…

by KO21 on Nov 11, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

lol, so true

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

The Avs are terrible at home and couldnt score on the power play at home…and they did both to us. But you know, if only the refs werent so bad maybe we wouldnt only be better than the blue jackets.

by potvins_cups on Nov 11, 2011 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Rec'd

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

more!

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Damn I wrote the wrong no.

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I can answer that question, Ozzy

Why Tavs no punch Avs in balls when crosschecked? Because there’s only one Sid Crosby.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 1:58 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

lol. Yeah, I almost forgot he did that.

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

He punched him in the face

that’s why the guy started punching him. It was quick and slick, but look for it here at the :08/:09 second mark…kind of a backfist of frustration if you will.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 11, 2011 4:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I loved seeing it

he caught him pretty good!

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 12, 2011 11:42 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

more

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

mo

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Correct

“Crapuano”

:)

=d

by AP77 on Nov 11, 2011 2:03 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

mo

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

give the man a break

He has the metabolism of the sun.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 2:06 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, he burns energy at a very high rate.

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

This reminded me

I can’t recall exactly where (maybe an official site video?) but I saw a piece on Grabner where he said he enjoyed being on the road cause he could order room service of ice cream and chocolate cake. Oh to exercise for a living.

by GreekIsles83 on Nov 11, 2011 2:14 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Damn. That's a fast metabolism.

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I died at this one

"Mario Lemiuex… I used to respect you."- Turgeon1992

by Zhora on Nov 11, 2011 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Definitley...

could have started and ended with this one! Rec’d!

LighthouseHockey: We saw this coming!
@JPinVA

by JPinVA on Nov 11, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

FTFY

screw homework, its all about islanders hockey

by DarthDoyle on Nov 11, 2011 7:16 PM EST up reply actions  

and some mo

screw homework, its all about islanders hockey

by DarthDoyle on Nov 11, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

mo

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

mo

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 2:15 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

mo

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

too long

screw homework, its all about islanders hockey

by DarthDoyle on Nov 11, 2011 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Mo

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 2:22 PM EST up reply actions  

fyi

for “why you”, use y u

screw homework, its all about islanders hockey

by DarthDoyle on Nov 11, 2011 2:26 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

mo

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

mo

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 11, 2011 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

lol

What do you mean they won 4 cups in a row? Is that possible?

by OzzyFan on Nov 12, 2011 11:16 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

i am photoshop ignant

but if you can put this with some voldemort garb or morph the two… it’d be nice i think…

These comments crawl up from the depths of the deepest Chasm of Saar

by bob l on Nov 11, 2011 3:34 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Hi all -

I’m not here to troll or anything, just to see what you guys thought of the game. I really like the Islanders, and truth be told, your team completely owned my team for 40 minutes. The Avs probably shouldn’t have won that game. Not that I’m arguing with the the fact that they found a way to pull it off, but they were pretty terrible in the first and second. It came down to overtime, and the Avs had the momentum at that point.

I’ll also agree that the officiating was terrible last night for both sides. That “tripping” call on Rolston in first was a completely awful call, but so was blowing the whistle too early on that power play “goal”. It only got worse from there. Avs fans are pretty convinced there was a sub-clause in the last CBA that said “screw the Avalanche whenever possible” and the refs have taken it to heart ever since. Last night, at least the shitty calls went both ways. It was a bit of a welcome relief since asking for a well officiated game seems out of the question.

I also found it interesting that Nyisles82 posted something about commenting on the Islander’s lack of passion. I made a very, very similar post about the Avs right after we lost to the Red Wings on Tuesday. TMS71 said that the Islanders lack the talent of other teams in the league – again, a sentiment reflected quite clearly over in Colorado as well. The “you get what you pay for” belief is quite strong in our fanbase, and the Avs currently have the lowest salary in the league. You complain about your owner paying too much to players, we complain about our owners not caring about the franchise and refusing to pay enough. Bryan’s Pop speculated on what O’Brien said during the timeout – what do you think people have been saying about the Avs for the past 3 years? Even though we have a bigger defense this year, they only decide to hit on occasion and Duchene gets owned almost every game. I guess there are a lot of parallels between our fanbases and teams that go beyond the Tavares/Duchene connection that everyone wants to talk about.

The Avalanche team you saw in the third was a desperate one. It had been 4 games since our last win, and we were 1-5-0 at home (worst in the league). After the debacle in the second half of last season, our coach is in very hot water – there is a chance he wouldn’t have had a job today if we had lost last night. Our team is also extremely young and captainless, and the only thing that is even somewhat holding everything together is confidence – a confidence we seemed to be lacking up until the 3rd. Add in the fact we don’t have a first round pick this year and the Western Conference is extremely difficult when it comes to the standings, and it really was a “must win” for us.

The Avs really did come out and play their game in the third – fast and physical with the defensemen jumping into the play. I don’t know if that means the Isles didn’t, but the Avs found a way to swing the momentum back in their direction. Giguere stole the game for us with a few great saves, including one right at the end of regulation. We got a few bounces to go our way and mercifully found the back of the net. I don’t think the Isles played that bad – they just got caught by a desperate Colorado team that finally found it’s groove after 40 minutes of play. In the locker room after the game, the players were calling this the “turning point” of the season. This was a huge win for us, one that we hope we can build on when we play Calgary tomorrow. It’s just unfortunate that your team got caught in the crossfire.

Just a Colorado girl in Montana who ♥s the Avs.
Varly: you're awesome. We love you. Please don't break.

by andidee15 on Nov 11, 2011 4:21 PM EST reply actions  

thanks and welcome

I agree inasmuch as I don’t think the Isles played worse in the third than they did in the first and second. The Avs certainly played better, but that should have just meant a scoreless third period. If Montoya kicks that puck behind the net instead of into it; if Mottau’s deflection winds up over the glass… then we’re all talking about the Isles’ turning point and the Avs “waking up too late.” The perception is entirely different based on those two things, and they’re pretty much out of anyone’s control – a matter of a milimeter here or there.

If nothing else, you remind us that every team in the league thinks the refs have it in for them. We know they’re just black-hearted kitten eaters who hate hockey and joy…

Good luck the rest of the way.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 4:35 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Thanks – you guys too. I know what it’s like seeing your team at #29 in the standings. Keep your heads up – the season is still young and so much can change from the first half to the second.

This may not be the last time I stop by this year. Like I said, I like the Isles (especially Tavares) and I’m trying to learn more about the teams other than the Avs. I may even stop by and watch a game with you at some point. Thanks for the warm welcome :)

Just a Colorado girl in Montana who ♥s the Avs.
Varly: you're awesome. We love you. Please don't break.

by andidee15 on Nov 11, 2011 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I always pull for Ryan Wilson

Drafted him for my team in Eastside Hockey Manager; he was a very good player for us. Won the Calder, in fact. Not sure how good Real Ryan Wilson is compared with that.

We may be in the box, but you get the penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Non-hockey scribblings at nightflyblog

by mikb on Nov 11, 2011 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

We ADORE him. He’s probably been our best defenseman all year. He hits like a Mack Truck (which is what we often call him), and even though he’s our smallest blueliner, he still leads the club in +/- and has made some absolutely amazing defensive plays this year to go along with his physical game. What he did to Tavares last night – classic Wilson. He has 9 points this year (1G/8A) and has looked really good offensively as well. He jumped from being our #5 D-man to #2 and has been getting huge minutes with Erik Johnson, who he works well with. I’d say that his play so far has been one of the most pleasant surprises of the year, along with finding out Shane O’Brien is actually a good hockey player, Kyle Quincey doesn’t suck anymore, and Ryan O’Reilly can put up the points. We LOVE LOVE LOVE Wilson so far and wonder why he wasn’t playing like this last year.

Just a Colorado girl in Montana who ♥s the Avs.
Varly: you're awesome. We love you. Please don't break.

by andidee15 on Nov 11, 2011 7:07 PM EST up reply actions  

A noble goal, to be sure. The Avs were aiming for that too last year. Hopefully it goes better for you than it did for us.

Just a Colorado girl in Montana who ♥s the Avs.
Varly: you're awesome. We love you. Please don't break.

by andidee15 on Nov 11, 2011 7:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for dropping in, andidee

Very similar situations, with “interesting” owners to be sure.

I am trying hard to put myself in your shoes and remember the thrill of a 3-0 comeback win. ;)

Lighthouse Hockey: A flute with no holes is not a flute. A Dane with no holes is Frans Nielsen.

by Dominik on Nov 12, 2011 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Official choice of Lighthouse Dog #1.

by Fabtraption on Nov 11, 2011 4:38 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Too funny
Avs fans are pretty convinced there was a sub-clause in the last CBA that said "screw the Avalanche whenever possible" and the refs have taken it to heart ever since.

No offense, but I have to think that young/inconsistent/stupid teams get a lot of this…we’ve been looking at it for years. I thought it was a great game up until we lost of course. I felt like the Isles outplayed the Avs and was pretty shocked at the shot totals.


You complain about your owner paying too much to players, we complain about our owners not caring about the franchise and refusing to pay enough.

This goes both ways here…much of the fanbase has complained about being a cap floor team…many have realized that drafting is the key to a rebuild, so they’ve recognized that “cap floor” is kind of a symptom of having a young roster. What we are complaining about mostly is the how they are choosing to spend the money, not so much how it’s spent. For instance, the total cap hit for Staios/Pandolfo and Rolston is about 7.8 million and (some in bonuses), but 6.6 cash value. Many believe that for 6.6 million, we could have landed one really good player instead of 3 pretty bad ones.

I guess there are a lot of parallels between our fanbases and teams that go beyond the Tavares/Duchene connection that everyone wants to talk about.

It’s funny, I haven’t followed the Avs that closely, but The Copper and Blue keeps putting out stuff on the Oilers that seems like it happened here within a year or two ago. They are obviously playing better than the Isles right now, but I feel like the Isles are probably a little further along in their rebuild. Watching the Oil clamor for “toughness” to “protect the kids” over the summer and how that doesn’t work etc. It’s amazing that everyone thinks it only happens to them. I’m sure most of the young and inexperienced teams fanbases are talking about “60 minute efforts” and “closing out games” and “inconsistency” etc. etc.

I guess the biggest difference between the Isles and most other rebuilds it that the Isles legitimately had no quality players anywhere in the organization when they started it. (Smyth walked, Yashin buy out, DP injury) Milbury destroyed the prospect system, overpaid everyone so they couldn’t be moved and so, the Isles had to start from absolutely nothing. Nobody to trade for picks, nobody waiting to grab an NHL job.

It will be interesting to see the rebuild paths go. Good luck, it was a very entertaining game, and it looks like the Avs have a pretty good future. Try to get somebody to trade us Stastny for Comeau and a 2nd (I made this proposal obviously bad on purpose).

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 11, 2011 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Many believe that for 6.6 million, we could have landed one really good player instead of 3 pretty bad ones

In fairness to Garth, that’s what he tried to do. Then when he couldn’t get 1 really good player he got what he could get.

by TMS71 on Nov 11, 2011 6:02 PM EST up reply actions  

pretty shocked at the shot totals

Welcome to playing the Avs. Our offense is explosive and puts up a ton of shots, but our defense is still figuring out the whole “defense” thing and don’t stop very many either. Avs fans have learned that shot totals mean very little when it comes to this team winning or losing. When we outshoot an opponent 2 to 1, we still lose about half the time. On the flipside, we still win games when we’re that drastically outshot as well. Just the way it goes.

…many have realized that drafting is the key to a rebuild, so they’ve recognized that "cap floor" is kind of a symptom of having a young roster.

For the most part, our fanbase has come to that conclusion too. We gush about Rick Pracey (our chief scout) all the time because he’s done such a great job. However, I wish the Avs would have made a few more free agency moves over the past couple years. Since we draft so unusually well even in the later rounds, there’s no reason why a few more FA signings couldn’t have filled in short-term. One of the primary reasons for our collapse last year was injuries and a lack of depth in the organization. $6.6 mil for 3 fairly crappy NHL players starts to sound really good when there’s a career AHLer playing on your top line.

Our fanbase’s concern comes from the fact that Kroenke Sports Enterprises (which is run by the Walmart heirs and isn’t hurting for money, btw), owns 6 professional sports teams in the NHL, NBA, NFL, NLL, MLS, and English Premier Football League, the Pepsi Center, TicketHorse (the provider of all their tickets), and Altitude (the TV channel they broadcast their games on). Just like the middle child in any big family, the fans are afraid that the Avs are going to be forgotten about. This summer, 65% of our players – including Duchene, Johnson, O’Reilly, Quincey, Jones, and others – as well as 2/3 of our coaches have their contracts due. I think the griping will die down once the big bucks are handed out, but it is a matter of concern for Avs fans since the organization hasn’t been too keen on ponying up the cash recently. We don’t want to lose our young guns because of money issues.

legitimately had no quality players anywhere in the organization when they started it

Yep, know how that goes. In ‘08-’09, the Avs lost Sakic and got a reality check. For years, they had traded picks away, only half-heartedly researched the ones they did draft, and continued to throw money at mediocre FA players. Those tactics worked pre-salary Cap, but not after it. The got a new GM and coach, blew the system, dropped the dead weight, and ended up with Duchene and O’Reilly that year. That was the same year you guys took Tavares. It’s always nice to know that there are other rebuilding clubs’ fans out there to empathize with other than the guys at The Copper and Blue. We’re not exactly on the best terms with them (especially after the trolling that went on after the last game of last season), even if we do know what they’re going through.

Try to get somebody to trade us Stastny for Comeau and a 2nd

Hmmm…. that might take a while. We’re still working on the Yip for Crosby and a 3rd, Hunwick for Weber, and Stoa for Parise deals. Unfortunately, it’s not going so well, so it could be some time before we get to that one. ;)

But in all seriousness, if O’Reilly keeps playing like he has been, Stastny may come on the market even as early as this season. It’s somewhat unlikely, but Sherman may consider moving him for a top scoring winger and 3rd line center. Three Top 6 centers sounds great in theory, but the club may decide to consolidate the talent and TOI to two lines instead of spreading it out. Given our lack of winger depth in the system and the fact we’re going to struggle to ice two good lines (let alone three) until we get it figured out, a trade is probably going to have to happen eventually. Duchene and O’Reilly have been proclaimed by Sherman as “core players”, so Stastny is by far our best bargaining chip. So even though I feel like I may be fanning the “stupid trade proposals that people take seriously” fire (not your’s of course, but I’m sure you know the kind I’m talking about), Stastny for ______ isn’t a completely crazy possibility.

Just a Colorado girl in Montana who ♥s the Avs.
Varly: you're awesome. We love you. Please don't break.

by andidee15 on Nov 11, 2011 6:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for the perspective

It’s always nice to hear that other team’s fans drive themselves as crazy as we do. One bit of advice: cherish those two Stanley Cups the Avalanche won. Because 20 years of disappointment and frustration might be just around the corner.

"He's depriving some small village of a pretty good idiot" - Mike Milbury on Ziggy Palffy's agent. On Twitter: @Dan_of_Science

by PGI on Nov 12, 2011 2:11 AM EST up reply actions  

We’re already halfway there! It’s been 10 years since the ’01 Cup.

Our fanbase is really excited about our current rebuild though. We all feel like we’ve got a really great group of young core players (Duchene, O’Reilly, Johnson, Landeskog, Varlamov) that are going to anchor this team going forward. Add in guys like Stastny, Jones, Quincey, O’Brien, Wilson, Galiardi, Winnik, Mueller (if his head ever heals) and our prospects like Elliott, Barrie, Seimens, Hishon (again, head), and Gaunce, and we’re in a good spot. Once our winger situation is taken care of, I think this team is going to go back to being one of the best in the league. The potential is there, especially when we get a little more experience on our young guys.

Maybe we’re just drinking the burgundy kool-aid, but we think that within 3 years, we’re going to have a contender on our hands.

Just a Colorado girl in Montana who ♥s the Avs.
Varly: you're awesome. We love you. Please don't break.

by andidee15 on Nov 12, 2011 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

The leg up that a lot of rebuilds have over the Isles

is their arena situations are stable and therefore, ownership is stable. (Or vice versa). Here, there has been a constant ownership problem because of the Isles lease and the problem of the county and town politics in getting an arena built (publicly) or allowing an arena to be built (privately). What ownership here is battling is that ownership (several over the years) have claimed that the lease prevents them from making money and has them taking a loss…so most smart businessmen can’t or won’t invest in losing money.

Therefore, previous ownership groups have traded away expensive players for next to nothing and when they tried to put a quality product on the ice (early 2000s), they traded away young/promising players for mediocrity a couple of them deals that were too long, and drafted poorly.

As you can tell, JT is really the only impact player drafted by the Isles in like 15 years or so (that actually played for the team long enough to matter). When you look at Luongo, Bertuzzi, Jokkinen, Brewer, Redden/Berard, McCabe, Chara, and some of the draft misses, this team could have had a really strong core 5-10 years ago. Amazingly, this has gone on so long that most of those guys are even past their prime!

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 12, 2011 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Man, that stinks. Even though we’re worried about our management neglecting us, they did promise the Avs would stay in Denver for 25 years (we’ve got 9 years left). And since KSE now owns all but 2 of the professional sports teams in Denver and has all the ticketing/broadcasting infrastructure set up, I don’t think the Avs are going anywhere for a LONG time. When a new arena is needed, well, thank you Walmart.

Luckily, Sherman’s been fairly stingy when it comes to trading young players – that’s part of why the Johnson/Stewart deal was so huge. Our team is working on “Building from Within” (a term that we’ve been slammed with for the past 3 years) by concentrating on drafting and retaining our farm. We’re starting to move into some trading to get the last pieces – Johnson, Varlamov – but for the most part, the Avs are standing strong on keeping their draftees. And they’ve been drafting extremely well. Our scouting staff likes going off the board and it’s worked out so far. In Pracey We Trust.

I hope your whole arena ordeal gets worked out. It would be a shame to see the Islanders leave just because they didn’t have anywhere to play.

Just a Colorado girl in Montana who ♥s the Avs.
Varly: you're awesome. We love you. Please don't break.

by andidee15 on Nov 12, 2011 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

We're close to 30 PGI

and I just made myself a little sad.

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 12, 2011 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

It's like Bizarro World, only exactly the same. But, like, far away.

And real high up. I propose going forward, all games in Colorado stop after the second period cause people get all tired from the altitude and shit. Refs too.

by Les Beaver on Nov 11, 2011 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

lol No way man! Why do you think the Avs are typically so successful in the third? If you can’t out-skate them, you out-last them. Hooray for high-altitude training!

It does have it’s drawbacks though. There’s a possibility that playing at a mile high for 41 games a season puts more strain on our guys’ bodies than the other teams, which could factor into our ungodly injury numbers from the past few years. Also, we had to give up Tomas Fleischmann this year due to pulmonary emboli that was possibly caused/made worse from living at altitude. And it’s such a shame – he and Matt Duchene were made to play together.

Just a Colorado girl in Montana who ♥s the Avs.
Varly: you're awesome. We love you. Please don't break.

by andidee15 on Nov 12, 2011 1:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't understand

How Colorado teams lose at sea level! I’ve skied there a couple of times and feel invincible when I start breathing the extra oxygen!

NY Islanders, just one irrational free agent signing away from contention!
Website:Lighthouse HockeyTwitter: @KeithLHHockey

by Keith Quinn on Nov 12, 2011 11:58 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

We certainly don’t get out-conditioned, that’s for sure. But when it comes to actually, you know, playing hockey, sometimes that leaves a bit to be desired.

Just a Colorado girl in Montana who ♥s the Avs.
Varly: you're awesome. We love you. Please don't break.

by andidee15 on Nov 12, 2011 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Welcome aboard

Definitely takes some cajones to come here and start a discussion as an outsider. A lot of us here are still feeling the pain of last night. I agree that the Avalanche turned their game around in the third period. Where they were mostly standing around the first two periods, in the third they were hemming the Isles in and beating them to the loose pucks.

From an Islander perspective though, the Av’s fiestiness shouldn’t have been enough to win the game alone. Like you said we are in very similar boats. You guys haven’t been winning at home and we haven’t been winning at all really. As a team and fanbase you look at an opponent thats struggling and you can’t help see it as an opportunity to cash in and right your own ship. The Islanders came out with that desperation in the first two period but from my perspective they lost something in the third.

I agree the Av’s skated better, but the Isles also stopped skating hard to loose pucks. Blame the altitude, blame laziness, blame lack of confindence with the lead, I am not sure what it was, but the Isles started playing strictly collapse hockey in the third. There were several times when (in the Islanders zone) a loose puck was up for grabs and the Islander forwards backed off it to clog the shooting lanes rather than get puck possession. Bad fundamental hockey as you are allowing the opposing team puck possession in your zone in hopes you will be in good position to block it…well you can see how well that worked out for the Isles.

Kudos to the Avs for scoring 4 unanswered, its nice to hear another fanbase shares our pain, but in this Isles fan’s opinion, it should have been a case of “too little, too late” in the third.

by GreekIsles83 on Nov 11, 2011 4:40 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah, it probably should have, but “Too Little, Too Late” has been the theme song of the Avs this entire calendar year. Our coach’s favorite saying is “We didn’t start on time”. This game reminded all of us so much of the ones from last year – play okay at the beginning, give up a goal and completely deflate, let in a bunch more, then try to make it interesting at the end while frustrating the fans and making them scream “WHY COULDN’T YOU HAVE PLAYED LIKE THAT IN THE FIRST?!” before pathetically losing and doing it all over again the next night.

This game really does have the potential to be a turning point for us because it shows this team is able to actually mount a push at the end that gets them somewhere. That’s how we made the playoffs in ‘10 – finding ways to win even though we shouldn’t. It became a bit of an identity for our team, one that we got away from last year. If we can use this game to recapture some of that “never say die” attitude, it could be what we need to get us back into the playoff picture.

I think both fanbases are pretty pissed that our teams didn’t put together a full 60 minutes. The Avs have still only done that once this season in our game against LA (our only other home win). I’m glad it was a 3pt game – the Isles deserved something for making the Avs look like crap for the first 40.

Just a Colorado girl in Montana who ♥s the Avs.
Varly: you're awesome. We love you. Please don't break.

by andidee15 on Nov 11, 2011 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

ya know what JP

To me, the first qualification to earn the “number one goalie” designation is to win consistently. IMHO none have them have earned that right. My rule would be, if you win, you get the next start. You lose, unless you were lights out and simply got no goal support, you sit. Cappy has taken a tough situation and made it worse by simply stringing games together.

by randyboyd on Nov 12, 2011 1:08 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip and shoulder surgery not required.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Billy_smith_si_cover_small
LightHouse Hockey game on!
Gigantor15_small
LHH Poster's 25U25 Consensus
Jt_small
The New York Islanders and The Rebuild

Recent FanPosts

Small
Being Reasonable About Garth Snow’s First Rounders
Dutchlogo_small
LHH off-season fantasy league
890_1__small
Expectations: Strome
Small
The Angstlander -- Inside the mind of an anxious Islanders fan (that means you!)
Small
Now that Phoenix has found itself a new owner...
Tubby_goalie_gif_small
Is Garth Snow actually drafting well, or are we all just pr*j*ct*ng again?
Small
Is It Hockey Or Rugby? - The Scrum in The Crease

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
What else is Russian sports media telling us?

  121 votes | Results

Isles Reading

Islanders Schedule

1979-80


May 24, 1980: Tonelli to Nystrom. At long last, the steady build of the New York Islanders from expansion doormat to surprise semifinalist to annual contender reaches the promised land: Buoyed by a late season trade for Butch Goring that gave the team the depth up the middle GM Bill Torrey had been seeking, the Islanders knock off the Philadelphia Flyers in six games.

The victory justified the faith in coach Al Arbour who guided them from their second season to their first Stanley Cup seven seasons later. The Islanders would not be the first expansion team to win the Stanley Cup, but they would be the only one capable of a dynasty.

1980-81


May 21, 1981: This time it was much easier. After falling to "only" 91 points in the 1979-80 season, the Islanders returned to their division title tradition, piling up 110 points -- a whole 13 points over second-place Philadelphia.

Between the quarterfinals (where they beat the upstart Oilers in six games) and the finals, the Islanders reeled off eight consecutive wins -- with a four-game sweep of archrival Rangers in between. As they defeated the Minnesota North Stars in five games for their second Cup, their goal difference in the final was a combined +10.

1981-82


May 16, 1982: Another year, another landslide title. The Islanders won the Patrick Division by a whopping 26 points over the second-place Rangers, and were seven points clear of their nearest competition for the President's Trophy, the still-not-quite-ripe Edmonton Oilers.

A first-round scare against the Pittsburgh Penguins turned in the Isles' favor thanks to John Tonelli's heroics, and a true dynasty was on its way: Past the Rangers in six games, then an eight-game sweep of the Quebec Nordiques and Vancouver Canucks to run away with the Stanley Cup.

1982-83


May 17, 1983: Not so fast, whipper-snappers. The Edmonton Oilers' steadily rising challenge for league supremacy took them all the way to the finals for the first time, where the New York Islanders summarily dispatched them in a four-game sweep. For the Islanders, the Dynasty was secured. For the Oilers, it was a powerful lesson in where talent ends and the demands of playoff hockey begin.

Four years, four Cups, 16 consecutive playoff series wins (a record that would grow to 19 until the rematch with the Oilers the following year). Mike Bossy scored 60 goals yet again, and Wayne Gretzky became acquainted with Billy Smith's crease.


Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Warlord2_small Mark D

Lighthouse_hockey_logo_2_medium_small Keith Quinn

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Hg_small Chris McNally

Master of FIGs and Power Tablature

Icon3_small ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein

71096_479208120482_1257968_n_small David Hanssen