Last word on the fabled Islanders-Kovalchuk bid
Ilya Kovalchuk agent Jay Grossman's version of interest from the Islanders as part of a Summer of Ilya postmortem in the Sporting News [emphasis mine]:
On reports of an offer from the Islanders: "They inquired. They called, we had some discussions. They had to get to the floor, obviously. We had a number of calls of that type of nature, with teams that would have been interested if we were interested in a specific kind of contract. Our objection going in was to put Kovy in one place for the remainder of his career."
Sure doesn't sound like they were "hot and heavy" for a $100 million deal, right? Sounds more like the kind of shorter-term, floor-reaching deal that gave Ilya the chance to re-test the market when conditions were better -- the kind of deal we theorized about up and down this site?
As I recall, on record Garth Snow actually downplayed his involvement -- contrary to what an excitable, sometimes prone-to-hyperbole Western Conference beatwriter wrote this week at Versus:
More than you can say for the jumble of dysfunction that is the New York Islanders front office. The Isles were used as the beard in the Kovalchuk sweepstakes, willingly going along with published reports that they were hot and heavy to hand him more than $100 million. But the Isles seemingly had no more of a firm commitment to do that than I do of taking a [lame cultural joke omitted due to unforgivable resurrection of Toto references].
There was one -- maybe two -- original report of the fabled $100M offer that Adrian Dater says the Islanders were "going along with hot and heavy." Everyone else simply relayed that report, including us on this here blog since it was obvious discussion fodder.
(As a mere hobbyist, I try to stay out of public MSM vs. blogger spats -- blogging being an interactive medium for writing and discussion, a medium that writers, reporters, philosophers, and anyone else can (and do) use. But I chuckle when MSMers whine about "bloggers" using dubious information, when MSMers run with dubious info every July 1 and early March. Credibility is in the writer, not the medium.)
Rewind to July and what actually saw the light of published, sourced reports, and you find Garth Snow conceded his involvement but was hot and heavy about nothing, telling Newsday:
"Over the last couple of days I've made maybe a hundred calls and explored options where, maybe it doesn't come to fruition, but I'm not doing my job if I don't make those calls."
So where did the "hot and heavy" come from? (Hot and heavy for Ilya? Maybe. For $100 million? I've yet to see the evidence.) If someone with the Isles was passing along B.S., shouldn't a reporter be more explicit when griping about that two months later as if it's objective reality? Isn't the best way to counteract B.S. sources to call them out explicitly? This is what I don't get about mainstream reporters who run with the "unnamed source" game when it's good for their own attention, then piss and moan about it afterward. Isn't the purpose of access to get to the truth -- or does that access compromise access to the truth, too?
Seriously, if someone with the Isles was dangling the false $100 million story bait, I'd want to know. If Dater has evidence of "front-office dysfunction," let's hear it. And please let it not involve the name "Milbury," who last worked on the hockey side in early 2006.
The Burden of Sourcing
To be fair, I normally trust agents far less than I trust excitable reporters who just returned from vacation to give us their version of what happened before they left. Agents like Grossman always have their clients' interests first (okay, maybe commission first, client second). But Grossman doesn't seem to have an incentive to downplay the Isles' interest now, after the fact. And Dater's "Five Burning Questions" column at Versus reads like any old online snarky-for-provocation hockey commentary -- the kind that MSM reporters are supposed to be above, because, you know, only bloggers do that.
In truth, I greatly respect veteran reporters like Helene Elliot, the L.A. Times reporter who cited an unnamed source for the Islanders big-money involvement. (Darren Dreger also was in on that, though it's unclear where it generated.) I know beat writers are still the last drip of lifeblood of objective info for most fans. I've no doubt some source -- whether with the league, the player or the club -- spread some version of that "as much as" $100 million theory, for whatever ulterior motives (For the team? For the player? For the "insider juice" of the source itself? For the sheer comedy of watching everyone run wild with it?). Alas, no one did it on the record.
If reporters want to pine about the legitimacy of the unnamed sources they routinely use, maybe they should stop using them.
Here's the thing: Responsible publishers of any medium relay (and cite) the claims made by hardworking members of the mainstream media. Personally, I trust them not to make crap up, and I expect them not to gloss over details. So if there was a source out there deliberately misleading reporters into thinking there was a $100 million offer, I understand why said source's anonymity was protected -- at first. But if such a now-proven-dubious source exists, and if they burned you, you no longer have reason to protect them now nor trust them in the future, right? Shouldn't you out them -- and maybe score a blow against such misdirection in the future?
In other words, shouldn't you call bullshit on the source itself -- and not on the team? Unless the source is with the team ... in which case you should make that connection clear?
Otherwise, you're just reporting what others said and adding snarky commentary. Just like bloggers do.
51 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
So I guess I can’t run with the rumor of the Islanders giving Roloson a 9 year contract… Dam you Ethics! Defeated again!
Trevor Gillies: Giving an all new meaning to "Mustache Ride"
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
Maybe we should've hired Yzerman...
he doesn’t even have prove anything as a GM and the MSM is already bowing to him.
—
But if you’re the Isles and someone floats a report that you’re offering $100M to Kovy, wouldn’t you let the story stay there? I mean, you know you’re not actually going to do it, but it could force the Devils – a division rival who are actually trying to pay the guy – to potentially ruin their cap situation the future. I say you let the story sit there and don’t worry about it. Let the product on the ice speak for itself and screw the MSM and their “perception”. It’s usually wrong anyway.
This is why
People don’t trust the media anymore as a whole and that the “blogosphere” is becoming the main source of news for many people. On issues from the wars, the economy, recovery, sports, foreign policy, these reporters continue to do minimal research, cite unnamed sources and interject tons of subjective opinion to sell themselves or their brand as a story. From there, there is little follow up, redaction or contradiction unless it comes in the form of equally sensationalized garbage from indistinct rival (think Olberman vs. O’Reilly). It’s sad everyone wants to be an O’Reilly and not a Cronkite. Accountability is in the toilet…sorry about the am rant, but most mainstream news is either unwatchable or unbelievable!
by Keith Quinn on Sep 9, 2010 7:13 AM EDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
A distinct rival
Damn you iPhone and your autocomplete!
by Keith Quinn on Sep 9, 2010 7:15 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
it’s also self-perpetuating b/c the more people start looking to blogs over the MSM, the more sensational the MSM gets in trying to bring them back therefore forcing more people to the blogs.
—
The only advantage the old-school beat reporter had over the average fan was access. But now, everyone’s opinion can be as informed as they want it to be. I think the beat reporter still has a place, but being a columnist has really lost its prestige (assuming it had some at some point), and is on the way to being obsolete.
it’s also self-perpetuating b/c the more people start looking to blogs over the MSM, the more sensational the MSM gets in trying to bring them back therefore forcing more people to the blogs.
I’m afraid of this too. It’s a bummer.
I actually miss the old-style beatwriter (the good ones, anyway). So when a beatwriter goes column-izing and slamming a team for something alleged to be happening behind the scenes, I wish there was the expectation of citing why/who/how.
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
I am fine with their inquiry
look Snow called asked a couple of questions…realized teh Isles could not get involved and moved on. I am glad we didn’t go for teh 15 years. I was ok with 7-8 years but I think because of DP and Yashin teh Isles are wise to stay away from career contracts
Any task BIG or small, Do it well or not at all
so i was at my brother’s this weekend, and i had to order not 1 but 2 kovy jerseys for him and my uncle… meanwhile i have to wait to see A) if nino makes the team and B) what # he chooses
that’s my last word on kovy til he tourches us for 15 points in 6 games
welcome to MSG, where 2 out of 5 vendors are safe to eat from!
what the big deal?
snow inquired, a deal didn’t happen, and a bunch of nonsense was reported. as quin8722 pointed out pretty effectively, real reporting is almost a thing a of the past, in news, sports, even the freakin weather.
but who cares about that stuff anymore? training camps are about to open. look at the new names on the roster to the right over there. especially on defense. JT has a year under his belt. okposo should be ready to fully blossom. more great young talent is on the way.
that’s what i’m thinking about.
I'm more interested...
…in why the Islanders let guys like Jankowski and Jaffe go.
When it was reported that they were going to offer Kovi $100M over 8-12 years they might have added that this is the organization that didn’t want to pay a 26 year old, somewhat talented LW a 10% raise so they could pay the league min for two journeymen ne’er-do-wells…
This is the upper management that decided to force radio fans listen to Howie and Billie bantor about the goaltending prowess of Eggs Levine (rather than describe play to the folks who couldn’t see it for themeselves)…or better yet, the same organization that pulled the catering service from the press box.
Last year they squabbled with Matt Martin about his entry level contract, This year they didn’t want to make more than the minimum commitment to their only 30 goal scorer in the GORDON-ERA… and they refuse to fix the damn ice surface until the TOH approves Wang-world.
Yeah… $100M to Kovi was going to happen… and I was going to make Barbara Eden 20 again, and have her “blink” us both to Marlon Brando’s hut.

God only kows how many bottles I’ve emptied looking for her!
My cup is 3/4 empty, How 'bout yours?
Ultimately, I'd be more interested too
Ironically, when I read his heading: “What team talked the talk, but didn’t walk the walk this summer?” I thought to myself, oh, he might mention the Kings or Isles, because both teams talked about landing a big defenseman fish and came up short."
Instead the evidence is…Kovalchuk? I’d like to hear about any current front-office dysfunction he’s referring to, because that’s news. If it’s Jankowski, fine (weak IMO, but fine). But I bet it involves an owner who gave out big contracts in 2001 and 2006, a GM who lost the reins in 2006, and the playing career of the current GM.
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
Pauly, you not gonna make his day?
But I bet it involves an owner who gave out big contracts in 2001 and 2006,
Those were really ill-advised “horse balls” statements of, “I’m here, I’m gonna be here and we are gonna make this thing work”
It reminds me of the scene from The Pope of Greenwich Village where Pauly anticipating a huge score at the track tells the toll booth attendant to keep the change from a $20… after a disapponointing outcome at the paramutual windows he waits for a quarter on the way back… “what’s the matter Pauly, you don’t wanna make his day?”
Wang isn’t handing out twenties anymore.. now he refers to the “tip calculator” on his Blackberry when he goes dutch on lunch for the draft table. “Hey who got the extra tomatos, I’m not splitting this evenly, those tomatoes are twenty cents extra”
We discussed it because we still have the a single strand of hope… but we all know he’s DONE! Hopefully [Charlie] Garth can carry the team past the Dark Ages aka Unlithouse Era.

6 months(?), and this is my first Pope reference… that’s amazing in and of itself.
My cup is 3/4 empty, How 'bout yours?
Last year they squabbled with Matt Martin about his entry level contract, This year they didn’t want to make more than the minimum commitment to their only 30 goal scorer in the GORDON-ERA
I realize we’re all high on Martin, but he’s only a 5th round pick who had 1 good year in the OHL. I’m sure money wise his entry level deal isn’t too far off from the Average 5th rounder.
I believe (and this is just my belief) that Moulson and the team had a one year deal in mind, but leading up to arbitration they took that time to try to iron out a long term deal. My guess is that Moulson was looking for a deal based on being a 30 goal scorer, while the Isles were looking at him more like a 20-25 goal scorer.
Trevor Gillies: Giving an all new meaning to "Mustache Ride"
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
I might come off like a fan boy here but I really like the way the Garth runs the front office. They’re the anti-Mets. They have plans in place at every important part of the year – draft, deadling, UFA season – and attempt to execute it as best they can. This UFA year for instance, they knew they needed some D help. They tried and failed to sign a top tier guy, so tehy went with some vets to add depth for low dollars and low commitment. Guys that could turn into a 3rd round pick at the deadline, like the one they gave up in a great deal to get Wiz.
They don’t deviate from their plan and have shown they are willing to take a risk (see: Kabanov) when it’s prudent to do so. No GM gets it all right, but you just have to hope their thought process is sound and they learn from their mistakes and I think Garth is really good when it comes to that.
And the reason the Islanders can gamble on Kabanov is that they have two 3rd rounders and even if the Kabanov pick blows up they can still fall back on Jason Clark who is a solid long term project and has much of the same Offensive upside.
Trevor Gillies: Giving an all new meaning to "Mustache Ride"
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
I think it was less of a gamble than anybody realizes. I think a lot of GMs failed to do their homework. I’d bet that Snow and Flynn have maintained some type of relationship. The big gamble for everybody was if Kabanov doesn’t go back to Moncton he signs a long term deal (3+ years with a KHL team). The isles probably would have been good to take him in the second round… had they kept a second round pick…. given that (SPECULATION) they already had word from Flynn that Moncton would accept him back, he was the real deal, and they could work with him as a TOP NHL FORWARD in a short period of time. You’d have to think that working with Flynn he’s going to be a solid two-way (as much as can be expected from somebody with that offensive upside) forward. Then again… he, like any other player, could be a BUST.
My cup is 3/4 empty, How 'bout yours?
I'm with Garth on that, too
Martin was still a late-round pick and overager. He had some leverage, Snow had some leverage. I like that Snow isn’t just handing out chunks of change here and there when we know he will have both future budgetary pressures and future needs to re-up their bigger young guns.
Moulson, too is a classic case of not overreacting.
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
agreed
I mean, he could be the Sensational Hockey Find of 2010… or he could be Trent Hunter 2.0. If he proves to have a consistent game and hits 20-30 goals reliably, then he gets paid. If not, the Isles can cut bait with minimal pain.
82 days into my latest contract approval process
To be honest...
… I like the way the show has been run since Garth has had autonomy. I can’t say i agree with all of the moves, but I can UNDERSTAND them… which is far better than what we’ve had for a long time. My point, however, was this is an organization who NOW errs on the side of CHEAP. That’s fine… but it also makes it LAUGHABLE that they’d offer a one dimensional scorer with very few intangibles $100M… especially when they have so much “potential” in the pipeline that can make them something Kovi has never been, a Stanley cup winner. You’d hope they’d learned from their mistakes…
COUGH***YASHIN***COUGH***DIPIETRO***.
Martin: If I rememebr correctly, as reported by NYIPB, Martin was looking for 3rd to 2nd round money, and the Isles wanted to keep him at 5th round money. If I’m not mistaken (and I probably am) that amounts to $500K v $750K which seems like a lot until you factor in the two way aspects, and the fact that you have 90% of that being AHL level money. If you pay the premium, and he plays 82 games in the NHL (MEANING HE WAS AN UBER-EFFECTIVE 5th ROUND PICK) WIN WIN… why even argue about it. What Martin had on his side was the fact that he was an after thought who turned it up in his extra year at juniors. If he fell off the map he’d be glazing donuts at Tim Hortons now. He risked injury by putting out on the line for them in Sarnia… put a little extra in the envelope…vs risking him going back into the draft next year… and going to a division rival… do we really need to live through that crap.
Moulson: I doubt they were squabbling over “potential”. We all saw what he was. he’s not faster, stronger or smarter than any other player… he’s EFFECTIVE. I think we all debated the pros and cons of long term (3+ years, moderate rate) v (1 year inflated rate)… he got 1 year at the moderate rate…. which, to me, means.. 10 goals (Isles can extend him at a bargain, big whoop), 25+ goals… adios mother f****r… That just says, "hey I was watching, and i don’t care where you spend 2011-12, we’ll have Nino, Petrov, Kabanov, Martin, Figren, Ullstrom and Joensuu on the LW depth chart next year.
Bergy: I think they had to qualify Bergy at $1.1M… there is no evidence that they would have even had to neg that higher because he settled for $700K with Tampa. I like the two-ways they signed with Sim and Hilbert, but now seeing that they hadn’t IMPROVED on Bergy unless Martin or Joensuu make the team and play 60 this year, that was ridiculous.
Again, all of those moves are understandable and can be explained… but they also are a smoking gun when it comes to WHY THE ISLES WEREN’T SIGNING JESUS OFF THE CROSS FOR $100M.
My cup is 3/4 empty, How 'bout yours?
I like the way the show has been run since Garth has had autonomy. I can’t say i agree with all of the moves, but I can UNDERSTAND them…
That probably best describes my view of him thus far (since independence). Even if some of these blow up or prove to be wrong, I’m not sure how much I will be able to fault him since there’s a working, defensible theory behind it.
Even Gordon — we don’t know how he’ll work out in the end, and maybe given loyalties one day Snow will have stuck with him “too long” (I’m talking several years in the future, when it’s more possible to fully evaluate him), but I definitely like it as a theory: This team is underfunded and needs some eyeballs to boot; so go with a young coach who can grow with the team, one who pushes an entertaining style, and see where it leads. If it doesn’t work, you’ve got the average shelf life of an NHL coach anyway (the Therrien experience). But if it does work, you’ve found one of the few areas where you can scrape out a little advantage over other teams.
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
Gordon?
There are two aspects of Gordon that puzzle me.
1. Is he better with a young team than Nolan would have been?
2. Is “the blind leading the blind” a bigger gamble than “the established” leading the blind.
I’m not sold on the fact that Gordon has “taught” or “lead” this NOW (it wasn’t quite that way in year one, what a WASTE) young team. I want to see a big improvement over year two in their game to game strategy. I think Gordon is still testing things with kids that are unsure of themselves.
Nolan has a proven record with kids. He has accomplished a playoff season with a weak veteran lineup. This was a personality conflict, and a vision difference between Nolan and all the New England Goaltenders…. who just got one of their own.
I’m not going to rehash the whole thing, but I didn’t agree with his Gordon choice when he made it, and I am definitely not as convinced as some that he is the answer.
That being said… I’m okay with this as well because a GM should have HIS GUY in there as coach. No matter the talent of the coach it will work better if they have a good relationship. I’m just not seeing the emperor’s new clothes. Gordon is nekked as a jaybird as far as an NHL coach goes. Let’s just hope he spent some time at the Men’s Warehouse this summer.
My cup is 3/4 empty, How 'bout yours?
I know we're on contrasting sides with this, but
1. I think yes — and one reason is that the players and coach know they’re in this together, whereas Nolan went from thinking he could push a veteran-laden 8th seed over the edge to thinking he would be the inevitable fall guy for a bad roster. I think Nolan was a bit paranoid (probably for good reason, given his history) and saw a young team the way most young teams are: Training grounds for youth while the coach takes the fall for the bad record. I just don’t see that working, and I think that slow realization is why he was dismissed late in the summer instead of earlier.
2. Nolan had been an NHL coach, yes, but he was hardly establishment and I don’t discount Gordon’s AHL experience seeing players become both NHLers and AHL washouts. (Nolan spent his interregnum coaching juniors when coaching at all, right?)
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
Probably not far off...
In MY perfect world…
1. Nolan is retained after a sit-down. “Ted, this is what I’ve decided to do. We are going to throw away 2008-10. I’d like to set the wheels in motion for a 4 year plan, and we don’t have anything to start it with. Can you handle one year of trying to make lemonade out of a steaming pile of dog poop?”
“Will you extend my contract?”
“Yes.. for two more years… no worries… but we need you to teach for two years after the blow up.”
“OK”
2. Nolan put Moncton on the map… so yeah, he only coached Juniors… but he did a pretty good job teaching KIDS HOW TO PLAY HOCKEY… which is contrast to the reasoning behind he was released. As far as being released late… I assume he had something to do with the drafting of Bailey as he spent a lot of time watching him and had a representative (his son) on the team.
Again… not trying to rehash a decision I understand… just pointing out one of the decisions I didn’t really agree with. Who the hell knows what really happened there. I think Snow wanted the switch the day he was “comittee-less”, and Nolan knew it. We’ll have to wait for the book to come out.
BTW: My Oliver Stone type thought process (which is something I hate about myself) is one of the reasons I think that Bailey will some day be the LEADER of this team.
Bailey is smallish, and was rushed… but I think that group of coaches/scouts saw something in him. Okposo, on the other hand has this happy-go-lucky attitude that we all love, but doesn’t lend itself to HOCKEY LEADERSHIP… Great hockey leaders are the types that run into burning buildings and their teamates are right behind them… and that is just to save the beer!
Okposo might run into a burning building to save his PS2… vets aren’t going into the building to save the PS2.
My cup is 3/4 empty, How 'bout yours?
I like plan 1. And really, I probably would have preferred that at the time. Not knowing Nolan, but knowing OF Nolan, I just got the feeling that relationship wasn’t going to evolve that way. I guess a major variable was that Nolan arrived as part of “The Committee” but wasn’t going to be part of that anymore. It’s hard for anyone to stick around and belief what they’re told after they’ve lost power.
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
Wang-o-rama
Hire a GM and a coach at the same time… then tell them that they both are just part of a committee… I don’t blame Smith for wanting out of the circus… and they pretty much left Nolan to bleed out for those two years.
Better situation would have been to ASK Smith who he wanted as HIS coach (he has said that option wasn’t presented to him, but he was fine with Nolan…not sure if that’s true). He also might have wanted to mention the “committee”… when Smith ran for hte hills he could have gone over the same process with Snow. If snow had his HS coach in mind for the job… they might have had to go to option 3…
Wang completely fucked that up. they had a good coach, an experienced GM and the ability to get the stink of Milbury out of Nassau county… but he just couldn’t let go.
He is extremely lucky that Snow takes this shit seriously, and is doing a pretty damn good job. Wang isn’t an idiot, but he is a hockey newbie who just really wanted to make a few hundred million a year on a real estate deal… and has proceeded to set a hockey franchise back 10 years in the process… and still no closure on the whole LHP.
Isn’t there a plastic surgeon in Great Neck that wants to buy this team?
My cup is 3/4 empty, How 'bout yours?
they refuse to fix the damn ice surface until the TOH approves Wang-world.
They did fix the ice surface- considerably. The players were raving about it this summer- how else do you think they had a hockey game in July?
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Sep 10, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Lol on them looking for a long term deal,
10yrs/100mill wasn’t long enough huh? lol. What a joke answer. He would have been playing here till he was 37 and he would have been getting paid like a king. He just didn’t want to come here. Too bad his agent can’t man up to the truth.
Go isles or Go home.
I strongly doubt there was ever a 10-year bid. We heard that once from unnamed sources and then never again (aside from repeating the same report). It makes much more sense for the Isles to have dangled a shorter-term, floor-reaching bridge deal that lets him re-test the UFA waters while he’s still in his prime.
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
I don't know,
it would have somewhat made sense to have garth/wang throw out a 10yr deal to reshape the franchise, attract fans, get us back to the playoffs, and hopefully get the LH project done with. All a big possibility if kovy comes and stays on the isles. But your right, the reports could have been wrong, but I’m not sure I’d doubt it with how long kovy fought with the kings and devils and over terms and contract length.
Go isles or Go home.
If Anything
I can see Wang getting the idea to offer a 10/100 Contract as a knee jerk reaction to losing out on the big name Dmen they wanted and plus as a way to try to force ToH’s hand (I believe the ToH had an announcement coming about the shrinking of the Lighthouse) and Snow talked him down from it.
Trevor Gillies: Giving an all new meaning to "Mustache Ride"
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
It's almost a suicide offer
The problem with 10×10 is it’s actually a much worse deal than the ones signed with NJD. 10×10 means $10M cap hit each year, and it means Kovy sticks around for the entire $100 million, whereas with the NJD (and LAK) offers his cap hit is much lower and he’s far more likely to retire before the entire cash outlay is made.
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
Objection to a long term deal?
So their goal was to NOT have a career long contract or was it their objective? Hope it is just sloppy reporting and not an illiterate agent.
LOL
I should’ve put a [sic] after that, because I was puzzled as well.
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
good catch
Reading it closely, I think what Grossman meant was that the Isles (and others) offered a shorter-term max deal (maybe something like 2/22 or 3/35), but they declined BECAUSE Kovi was looking to spend the rest of his career in one spot:
“We had a number of calls of that type of nature, with teams that would have been interested if we were interested in a specific kind of [short term] contract. Our objection [to that] going in was to put Kovy in one place for the remainder of his career.”
IOW, he didn’t want to be a hockey mercenary, rented out to whatever team was making a title push at the time, so he picked a team that he felt would contend repeatedly. He may not have picked particularly well in that case: Lou’s done soon, Brodeur’s done soon, and they will probably have to sacrifice a couple of good young players on the Altar of the Salary Cap.
Actually – I admire Kovi for wanting to craft a deal like that. Maybe it means he gets it; maybe this will translate into less indifference in his own zone. He and Parise seemed to be the only Devils to give two craps in the playoffs against Philly.
PS: – “one-dimensional scorer” reminds me of Tim McCarver’s reply to the complaint that Bob Gibson “only threw one speed” – “That speed was a thousand miles an hour.” Kovalchuk may be one of the five best pure goal scorers in the league… it’s possible to craft a team to exploit that talent to the fullest and cover up his poor defense. But it won’t work as well to turn him into a 2-way, 30-goal scorer. That’s not what you’re paying for. Those guys are a lot easier to find than 40+ goal scorers, so don’t ruin the irreplaceable talent in favor of a more-common talent. You could say Stevie Y did it, and you’d have a point – but frankly, the Wings also had Federov, Larionov, Lidstrom, Shanahan; they had Coffey (for a bit), Cicarelli (ditto), Ray Sheppard (double-ditto)… they could afford to lose 25 points from Yzerman because they had a metric ton of great players and secondary scorers. The Devils have Parise and Zajac… period. They NEED him to be a dominant offensive force, even if the other guys have to pick up a little slack in front of Marty. That’s why Lou also splurged for Volchenkov and Tallinder.
82 days into my latest contract approval process
Lou’s done soon, Brodeur’s done soon, and they will probably have to sacrifice a couple of good young players on the Altar of the Salary Cap.
Huh? Lamorillo signed an extension this year. On Brodeur, the Devils did just fine without him in 2009-2009 when they set a record for franchise wins. Lastly, what young players do they have sacrifice, all they have to do is waive Salavdor and Zubrus and send them to the AHL, that gets the Devils under the cap with room to spare.
To take your objections in order
Lou has as much chance of finishing out his contract as Kovi does.
The Devils did just fine until the playoffs, when WITH Brodeur back, they spat the bit against Carolina.
They COULD waive Salvador and Zubrus, but that only gets their hits off the cap… they still have to pay the money. And then they have to find FOUR players instead of two to fill their roster, and only have $2.6 million under the cap to do it with. They only have a few more weeks to do it, too. And after all that, Parise has to be re-signed sometime before next season, they will have three defensemen (Salmela, Fraser, Greene) to try to re-up or replace… It’s going to be very tough. Hence my observation – unless they can pull some major voodoo and move a big contract (and many of them have NTC) for cheap spare parts, it will cost them someone like Zajac or Parise, whom they would rather keep.
I mean, they could pull it off, and Lou’s a smart fellow… but he’s got a mess on his hands.
82 days into my latest contract approval process
Lou isn’t getting any younger, and he’ll be 68 next month, but I don’t quite understand why you think he won’t fulfill his recent contract extension. It’s not like he’s being wheeled around with an oxygen tank and showing obvious signs of senility (Rolston’s contract aside), so barring some unforeseen health emergency there’s little reason to expect he won’t be around to at least finish it out.
The Devils did just fine until the playoffs, when WITH Brodeur back, they spat the bit against Carolina.
And some of that blame lies at Marty’s feet, but not all of it. Just as the year before against the Rangers and the following year against the Flyers, it was a team failure.
What’s your point? You brought up the fact that Marty is closing in on retirement, I assume, to suggest that the team will struggle when he’s gone… but then your comment about their series against Carolina seems to contradict that sentiment by suggesting Brodeur isn’t a good enough goalie now. Which is it?
They COULD waive Salvador and Zubrus, but that only gets their hits off the cap
That’s all that’s important. It’s not the optimal way to go about it, and I’m not personally a fan of the practice, but if eating $6.3m gets the team under the cap and saves the loss of some prospects and/or picks, then so be it.
To the rest, I see no situation in which Parise or Zajac would have to be moved.
Playing Devils' advocate since 1982.
Let's sort stuff out:
-I think we can all agree Brodeur was a bit horrendous in the playoffs, and the devils at the time weren’t built to win a ton of games where marty gives up 3goals/gm or more, specifically against a d that is considered by many to be one of the best in the nhl. Brodeur’s play could be because brodeur broke down from his 77starts or because he finally is aging or a little of both or a fluke. Believe what you want there.
-Lou is a smart guy, very smart. And with how he’s built the team this offseason, they look like they should win the cup this year. Next year will be interesting to see because I wonder who they will find to replace the predicted loss of Langenbruner and Arnott for Parise’s new contract, so expect a slight drop in overall potential. But the year after that, Rolston’s $5mil is off the books and a little more cash too for Lou to work his magic with again. Think that’s not a lot of money? That’s what brings in a player like: Volchenkov or ~Elias or Streit or Getzlaf. Take your pick, but $5mil is that gamechanger money that puts the devils back as top stanley cup contenders. And brodeur could retire eventually, but any number of goalies can fill-in that job with flying colors, not brodeur colors, but damn good colors with the system they have.
-Salvador and Zubrus being waived is the perfect solution. No bargaining and pennying from other gm’s, not hasseling or other annoying things. And it solves the cap problem immediately. Lou will probably waive one of them, if not both before the season. If waived, Salvador will get picked up, no question. Zubrus would be interesting, not sure any team would want him at his cost and latest performance, so he could end up as the devils best ahler for the season. lol. But I’m sure before the season is over, someone making a playoff run would like to pick him up cheap. And not a chance Zajac or Parise are moved. For lou to do that, he would have to be senile and would most likely be hanged in NJ for that move, lol.
Go isles or Go home.
The semantics of "one-dimensional"
Fair enough there. I’m sure every team would love to have a 40+ goal scorer on their team now, with his demonstrable elite shooting ability.
But I’d argue that the issues is committing so much money (and cap space) to him for a decade. In other words, 40 goal scorers are nice; some of them might even be more valuable than two-way 30-goal scorers (I don’t think so, but I accept it’s possible). But a deal like that is only worth it if you’re sure he’s a 40+ guy for the next decade. I don’t think he is, and I think that money is better invested elsewhere — maybe not this year or next, but in five years, yes.
Eventually, $6.66M per year cap on a “30-goal guy who used to be a 40-goal guy but was never a backcheck guy and is starting to look like a guy with X issues” is a problem. That’s why that deal is insane to me.
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
oh, when you put it THAT way!
Stop making sense, Dom! My bubble, you have bursted it.
But seriously – you’re right. This looks bad for the Devils long-term. (And short term ain’t no trip to the fair, either.) If Kovi was a consistent FIFTY goal guy, then it would be a little more palatable to put up with some casual backchecking.
Come to think of it, I should have said 2-way, 20+ goal scorer, since that’s more of the comp we’re looking for. Two-way THIRTY goal guys are pretty darned rare too!
82 days into my latest contract approval process
Dominik, I'm actually impressed.
I’m proud of you. was not sure you had it in you to call out media.
Adrian Dater went to the Denver (Teri Frei Espn/Burnside) school of Islander bashing who’s knowledge on the club stops around 2004.
Scott Cullen was the one who made the mess twittering his so-called sources claim the Isles could make such an offer, he also took Snow’s April comments and put Wang’s name to them and he’s been painfully sloppy rushing 30/30 reviews.
Wow, soon we are going to get you calling out Arthur Staple for writing the 222 goal Islander forward corps are weak who left that out of his Ranger/Devil forward comments who also scored 222 goals. Even Brian Compton of NHL.com picked up on that one when noting Atlantic Division goal totals last season and wondered what was going on.
Let’s see if a new Cablevision/Msg employee with an Islander background is hired by Msg to replace Goring in that studio or did someone just save money by eliminating a contract under the guise of Msg’s favorite past-time, which is replacing people critical of them.
Sure, Charles Wang wanted the first head coach fired on his watch to now give givie impressions of his hockey team on live television during game play and Rob Carlin to upset his head coach after games while Sam Rosen runs downstairs to save Tortorella from Larry Brooks, we have Howie on vacation or in a very quick rush to beat the traffic.
Keep up the good work.
by New York Islander Fan Central on Sep 9, 2010 9:57 PM EDT reply actions
Thank you for your generous condescension. I am actually unsurprised.
As I’ve replied in the past, repeatedly, I call out media when I feel like it — but it’s far from my main purpose, because I write here for the fun of it, about a hockey team, and writing about media following that hockey team frankly isn’t very fun for me.
So thanks for the kudos, and cheers for once again turning a comment into a veiled soapbox chiding me to be a media watchdog. I am proud of you for leaving one of these comments without turning it into an off-the-shelf MSG rant — oh wait! Scratch that, i misread it. Your tone is often confusing.
I will let you know the next time I wish to call out Arthur Staple, but here’s a hint: It will probably come the next time I actually read a Staple column for info, which isn’t likely to be soon.
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
Note Darren Dreger. not Scott Cullen.
by New York Islander Fan Central on Sep 9, 2010 10:15 PM EDT reply actions
Dominik,
I don’t do condescending, soapboxes, or anything veiled, much less tell you what to write about. I actually posted those things here because I thought you would be interested and was sincere of my praise of your efforts to point on Adrian Daters poor effort.
Nothing else.
If I thought you should write on the items I added, I simply would have suggested it.
Obviously the only thing we agree on is we are confused by the others tone so let’s just move on.
Thank You.
by New York Islander Fan Central on Sep 15, 2010 1:34 AM EDT up reply actions
My apologies
If you’re sincere, I’m sorry for calling you out, and I thank you for the praise. Online/textual discourse can be funny like that.
But please understand that being “proud” of me, and thinking I didn’t “have it in [me]” — whatever “it” is, for whatever purpose — as your opening can read as condescending. Since you’ve taken me to task in the past about relaying what’s reported in mainstream media, I figured it was more of the same.
Agreed to move on past our crossed tonal wires here.
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
For Whatever Its Worth
I communicate with NYIFC on an almost regular basis and from my POV he is 100% sincere in his compliments directed to you and LHH. And I can assure you that NYIFC really dislikes the crappy media treatment the Isles tend to get- really, REALLY dislikes it.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Sep 15, 2010 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks
I certainly don’t doubt his distaste for Isles media coverage!
Lighthouse Hockey: Trying to reconstitute the Hogue-Turgeon-Thomas line from NHL 94.
what?
More than you can say for the jumble of dysfunction that is the New York Islanders front office.
whoever wrote this is a chooch.
Chris Botta
in his most recent fanhouse entry on the Isles states that the notion of the Isles calling and seriously inquiring about Kovie was “staged”. However, he doesnt bother to mention WTF reason Grossman would possibly have to lie about this now and “stage” such a thing, especially since it came out AFTER Kovie already signed (and was approved by the NHL.)
His preview of the team isnt that hot IMHO either, but what can you do about that? Its not like I need him to paint rainbows and sunshine.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by 






























