Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: New York Giants Win Super Bowl XLVI, 21-17

What the Hornqvist, Little deals mean for Kyle Okposo, Josh Bailey

I know it was just yesterday that I ventured you might be tired of salary talk.

(If you are, my answers to Arthur are now up at Anaheim Calling. In other links, Andrew MacDonald's Twitter Q&A was fun. ... And Ken at Okposo Net has been filing some quotes from the summer prospect camp (Brock Nelson right here, Travis Hamonic right there) ... And Bruce Peter at Puck Worlds has been covering that World Hockey Summit, including a nice post on the juniors question here, and another on the Europe transfer issue here -- on that note, Rene Fasel sure came off like a tool in that Puck Daddy bit betraying his entirely Euro-centric slant as "International" hockey head.).

Anyway, two league salary stories from this week are relevant to decisions the Islanders will face next summer: Namely, the next contracts for Josh Bailey and Kyle Okposo. Nashville's RFA Patric Hornqvist, 23 and coming off a Matt Moulson-like surprising 30-goal season, signed for 3 years, $9.25 million. Meanwhile, Atlanta's Bryan Little, 23 in November and coming off a severe drop after a 30-goal season two years ago, signed for 3 years, $7.14 million.

Now, Bailey and Okposo are each younger than those two and also have one more season to put up data before their second contracts are due. But for a hint of what's to come it's worth taking a gander at how these players look next to each other:

Star-divide


Player-Season (age)

GP

G

A

P

+/-

PP

PK
Corsi/QoC
team rank
Rating
team rank

Sh%
Okposo 2008-09 (age 20) 65 18 21 39 -6 3:10 1:21 5th 5th 10.9%
Okposo 2009-10 (age 21) 80 19 33 52 -22 4:17 1:49 6th 14th 7.6%
Bailey 2008-09 (age 19) 68 7 18 25 -14 3:10 0:03 8th 7th 9.5%
Bailey 2009-10 (age 20) 73 16 19 35 +5 2:07 0:32 11th 3rd 14.3%
Hornqvist 2008-09 (age 22) 28 2 5 7 -3 0:55 0:02 n/a n/a 3.7%
Hornqvist 2009-10 (age 23) 80 30 21 51 +18 2:50 0:02 9th 1st 10.9%
Little 2008-09 (age 21) 79 31 20 51 -5 4:00 0:02 5th 4th 18.0%
Little 2009-10 (age 22) 79 13 21 34 -6 2:58 0:02 12th 6th 7.9%

Those two ranking categories (Corsi relative to Quality of Competition, and "Rating," which is a relative +/- within the team) are from Behind the Net, and I include them here just as a rough way to get an idea of how important -- and how tough the assignments -- each guy was to his team at 5-on-5. ... Shooting percentage, meanwhile, can give you a strong hint on whether a guy's year was a little luck-aided (Little in 08-09?) or luck-harmed (Okposo in 09-10?), since players don't generally suddenly forget how to shoot or suddenly learn to shoot twice as well as before.)

Further Reading: Dirk Hoag at Predators blog On the Forecheck has an argument praising the Hornqvist deal, stating he's no flash in the pan and noting his shooting percentage hardly screamed "fluke!" Adam Gretz has a post at FanHouse focusing on both deals, and examining why Little's production dropped so much (a drop in PP time being one factor).

 

Where These Guys Stand

Now, these forwards are of slightly different ages and different pedigrees. Okposo was a 7th overall pick in 2006, just five spots ahead of Little in that same draft. Bailey was a 9th overall pick two years later. Hornqvist was now famously an afterthought -- a 7th rounder in 2005.

We've talked before here how Okposo's tough minutes and bad luck likely fed that poor plus/minus last season. (I also suspect he's been relied on too heavily at this age.) Put that aside and consider his age and all-around deployment -- the only one in this group to be used on both special teams units -- and you could picture him, after this coming season, clearly being the best player among this group. He's already its highest single-season scorer by points.

Bailey, on the other hand, has typically had less demanding assignments and has experienced a position shift (possibly temporary) that has reflected a more stuttering development. Is he a left wing or is he a center? That question may not be answered by next summer, but I bet it affects his contract negotiations. While the Islanders likely see his future still as a center, it's been on the wing that he's played his best so far as an NHLer. If this season represents more growing pains for the youngest member of this group, it might depress his asking price, which wouldn't be the worst situation for the Isles if they happened to lock him up for longer at that lower price.

But looking at the numbers and ages, in Bailey, Okposo, Hornqvist and Little we have four players with similarly uncertain track records in their early 20s. (Such ups and downs are hardly surprising for any player, but especially so for players early in their development.) As it happens, Okposo and Bailey are the two who have followed the more "expected" curve from one year to the next -- Little, in contrast, saw a big drop, while Hornqvist saw the unlikeliest of Moulson-esque jumps.

Guess the Contract

[Update: After sleeping on this a bit, I decided I need to clarify the question.] Fortunately the Isles have another year before they have to put an RFA value (and term) on these two. But given their age and growth curve so far, what do you suppose those numbers and terms will be? And if either Okposo or Bailey does not improve last year's counting stats, which one has more to lose at the negotiating table -- Bailey, right?

It all depends on how 2010-11 goes, but right now I'd bet next summer Okposo signs a Hornqvist-like contract (maybe a little over Hornqvist's 3 years, $3.083 million cap hit), while Bailey gets something closer to Little's (3 years, $2.383 million cap hit) or David Perron's (2 years, $2.1 million cap hit with a $2.5 million top salary).

Comment 26 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think we are in good shape if we can get them to stay at around $3million/year

I would like to see contracts like that…maybe an option for a 4th year

Any task BIG or small, Do it well or not at all

by Rickfansince76 on Aug 25, 2010 7:32 AM EDT reply actions  

A bigger question will be in the 2012 summer

When Tavares’ contract is up. Do they give him a big 5+ year contract or just a three year one and sign him long term later but lets worry about this year first before we talk about next summer or the one after that

by rockhouse15 on Aug 25, 2010 8:01 AM EDT reply actions  

2012, 2013, 2014

One of the things I enjoy about this question is: Imagine we had a Tavares/Okposo type we had to extend this summer. It’s harder to know where each salary slot fits when you don’t know what the guys due next summer will command, isn’t it?

In other words, when the Isles need to sign/decide on:
-Okposo/Bailey/Comeau/Schremp … they’ll be a year away from knowing JT’s number;
-when it’s JT’s turn…they’ll be a year away from knowing the number of any rookie who begins this year (Hamonic? Nino? de Haan?)

Best-laid plans as you build and lock up your core, but there’s bound to be some surprises from one year to the next.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 25, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

What about the next CBA?

Dom, I get the nervous shivers when you put all those names on a time-line like that. The current CBA only goes through the 11-12 season and expires just before the start of the 12-13 season. So what happens when we have to resign KO and Bailey after this year (and Schremp/Comeau/Hillen are all RFAs after this season too) and take into consideration that after the first season of any deal they get, we might be in a drastically different salary space? (AND we have to think about Moulson next summer too…)

We already know the NHLPA and NHL are behaving contentiously about the next CBA. So what will Garth do? (Is it even legal to construct a deal tied to potential changes in the salary cap caused by the next CBA? And if it currently is, would they leave that ability in the next one?) We are seeing, although in a vastly differing economic, legal, and social situation, what the effects of that sort of contentiousness on pending CBA negotiations can have on player management over in the NFL right now, with teams unwilling to extend players while the CBA is up in the air for them.

(Every thought just creates more questions!)

Also, hockey is one of the few major “North American” sports which has competitively comparable leagues outside of the continent. We’re already seeing players depart North America for Russia and elsewhere when they can’t get the deal they want with an NHL team. Fortunately I think the Islanders current NHL youth core isn’t particularly at risk in that particular sense.

Overall, I think that your projections of ~3mil a year for KO and ~2mil a year for Bailey are likely to be accurate, but the big question is going to be term and structure. I’d start to speculate here about what we might see in the next CBA, but that really deserves it’s own post…

The big IF is their performance this season. Logically, if either of them see a 20 point increase from this season, their price tags will go up. Likewise, if either of them are unfortunately to be injured and miss any sort of time, the tag will go down.

My bet? We’ll see Garth try to lock them both into deals with an option to mutually void some of the later years in the event of major CBA changes, assuming they can make the language for that void agreeable to the league and insulated from misuse.

by MTBVibe on Aug 25, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Answering my own question....

….section 11.13 of the current CBA, page 50 ( ) states:

11.13 Option Clauses/Voidable Years. SPCs shall not contain any option clause or
voidable year, whether automatic, optional or otherwise.

Nixes that thought from consideration!

by MTBVibe on Aug 25, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Correcting my absent link:

2005-2011 NHL CBA

I’m putting together a FanPost with a bunch of other things I noticed in a quick read of the document just now. (472 page pdf, quiet day at work…yeah.)

by MTBVibe on Aug 25, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh man

The CBA contains lots of fun and confounding clauses.

The stuff on mortgage expenses, fees given to players in the event of franchise relocation, and the definition of a life “partner” are awesome.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 25, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Heh, I’m going to have to examine those now that you’ve pointed them out…but I’m not sure that I’ll bring them into this FanPost I’m writing, trying to hit the “big” points for generating a cohesive idea of the situation…should have it up shortly!

by MTBVibe on Aug 25, 2010 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great questions

As you noted, voiding/option years are not possible. But the CBA expiration is a massive elephant — to me the CBA is “working,” or should be allowed longer to work and expose its own consequences, but obviously the owners either don’t see it that way or see the current union weakness as an opportunity to extract more concessions, which could mean a smaller share of HRR for the players.

So as for how Snow anticipates that? I have no idea. I guess he’ll have a slightly better clue by next summer.

Of course the other X-factor for us is how much Wang will be willing to spend, and if he’ll even know what venue his team will play in just a few seasons into the next CBA.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 25, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I could say Okposo for Bobby Ryan (and every Isles fan would kill me)

ummmm, yeah, we should talk, Dom. Things like this are simply not said, not even in jest.

Nice interview.

by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Aug 25, 2010 8:48 AM EDT reply actions  

I was under duress!

:) Yeah, it was funny, I looked at their roster and the NYI roster and absolutely could not contrive anything desirable that made sense for either side. They have guys who are either too old or are slightly older, pricier versions of what we hope our guys become.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 25, 2010 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dom, why don't you take a seat right over, we've got to talk about loyalty in our family,

lol, jk. Not worth the trade right now. Ryan wants $5mil/yr or more and still isn’t signed(i believe) for some reason. And unless KO has a 70-80pt+yr, I don’t think he’s getting more then $4mil/yr in hopefully a long term deal.

On trading for ryan, we could make a deal, but it depends if the ducks like prospects or not. I don’t see why a schremp, joensuu, draft pick(and maybe one more average prospect like rahk or reese) trade wouldn’t pull him away at this point with all the negotiation problems they’ve been having.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Aug 25, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Hey Fredo, we're going fishing..."

Ryan’s a major asset though. So I figure the only thing on our roster that could pry him away is the few pieces we wouldn’t want to give up.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 25, 2010 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

off subject

i read at nj.com that the nhl had rejected the second Kovi contract. anyone can confirm?

by Lakewood Islander on Aug 25, 2010 11:11 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Supposedly

They rejected a proposed “structure,” according to Puck Daddy. So not a formal proposal, but a framework I guess.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 25, 2010 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

thanks,and DO NOT mess with KO!

by Lakewood Islander on Aug 25, 2010 1:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Haha, no worries.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 25, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

The great thing about being near the floor

Is that basically we can pay these guys just about anything and not worry about it.

BTW: I still say Bailey to Wing, Schremp to center unless Schremp suffers enormously this season which I doubt.

Dominik signed me for 20 years, and all I got was a press conference and a voided contract...
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Aug 25, 2010 1:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Here be monsters

That is nice, but it does carry some risk that worries me: One or two wrong moves and suddenly you have good money sunk into an average player. Perhaps worse: even with a new building the Islanders will probably have some kind of internal budget ceiling.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 25, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we’ll be alright as long as there’s no more 15 year deals.

Dominik signed me for 20 years, and all I got was a press conference and a voided contract...
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Aug 25, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

All our problems/future depend on:

if these young guns want to sign longer term security deals with hometown discounts over 1year prove myself contracts. We lose a bailey or a ko in free agency, we have a somewhat BIG problem to fill.

Let’s say:
KO has a 30goal/70pt season. Now, on the open market KO will fetch around a $4-4.5mil/yr 1-2yr deal most likely. We could, get him at hopefully a 3-5yr contract at $3-$3.75ml/yr. Question is, will he do it or does he want to immediately move to a contender? If KO wants to stay, he’ll stay. If KO wants to go, he’ll have no problem finding suitors. But the big question is not really how much we need to pay him (since we can fit a big number if needed), but does he want to still play for the isles.

Same with bailey, but to a smaller extent. Say JB has a 25goal/50pt season. He’ll be looking at the same stuff and questions KO is, but at a smaller budget.

I don’t think the problem is how much we pay them, since we have worked with cap hits, a $4mil/yr goalie who’s seen very little playing time, and have a very solid team for working on the cap floor. The problem is, do KO and JB want to stay on the isles or do they want to venture elsewhere with their career? That is the main question I believe on this subject. AND, I’m a firm believer of getting KO’s deal-multi-yr extension done during the season because of his importance to our team, and get JB’s contract done asap after the season.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Aug 25, 2010 2:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Beggars can't be chosers

I had this arguement with another writer named Rob Mcgowan, Would the agents get involved and try to negotiate a max 3yr deal for KO and 4yr deal for JB because at the end of the deals both would be UFA (26yrs old) and maximizing their next and biggest contracts. So basically taking a Jordan Staal deal 4yrs at 4mill, then again seeing what Toews and Kane got for 2nd contracts(5yrs)kind of gives players better job security.

my guess – KO – 3yrs at 2.95mil
                      JB – 4yrs at 2.50mill

by steelermafia on Aug 25, 2010 10:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes, a lot of these second contracts are negotiated in a way that if you extend them past UFA age, then the salary escalates. So you either pay them less on a shorter RFA-controlled term, or you pay them more as you “buy out” some of their UFA years.

It will be an interesting negotiation.

Lighthouse Hockey: An always-open repair shop for mikb's sarcasm module.

by Dominik on Aug 27, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

OT - Dom

Hockey’s Future re-did top 20 prospect list with El Nino at the top with

but has Kirill Kabanov ranked 7th but a higher ceiling rating 8.0 not sure what they base their rankings on – ( also no Martin)

by steelermafia on Aug 25, 2010 11:00 PM EDT reply actions  

LOL

Yeah, someone posted that in another thread a few days ago, and we were all … “confused” would be the word.

Lighthouse Hockey: An always-open repair shop for mikb's sarcasm module.

by Dominik on Aug 27, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

hockeyfutures.dum

I think they throw darts at a Ouija board, with a few d20 and old O-Pee-Chee trading cards in French. I’m surprised Carol Vadnais and Bob Boughner aren’t on the futures chart.

My latest contract is for 31 years.

by mikb on Aug 27, 2010 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip and shoulder surgery not required.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jt_small
Looking Ahead: Free Agent Defensemen
5790919740_006af70e93_t_small
John Tavares – The Anti-Islander
Kevinwriterpic_small
Anders Lee: Worth the Wait

Recent FanPosts

Kevinwriterpic_small
2012 NHL Draft Prospect Profile: Nail Yakupov
Capt
10 Game Chunk #5: Playing Like a Playoff-Bound Team Would
Icon3_small
January 2012 Power Rankings: A Playoff-Level Month?
Small
WHY IS EATON PLAYING WHILE REESE SITS?
Gigantor15_small
JP's January Plus/Minus Poll
Kevinwriterpic_small
The One-Two Punch
20091221_pauly_190x190_small
Time for MSG and Time Warner to pay!!!! My new campaign!
Small
Dad, What Should Jan Do With All These Centers?
5790919740_006af70e93_t_small
Milbury Islanders vs. Current Oilers
Capt
Lighthouse Fantasy Dream Season, wrapup

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Rhett Rakhshani:

  240 votes | Results

Isles Reading

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New York Rangers 50 33 12 5 71
Philadelphia 52 30 16 6 66
Pittsburgh 53 30 19 4 64
New Jersey 52 30 19 3 63
New York Islanders 51 21 22 8 50

(updated 2.5.2012 at 4:42 PM EST)

New York Islanders Roster

# Pos. DOB W H
Josh Bailey 12 LW 10/2/1989 190 6-1
Rick DiPietro 39 G 9/19/1981 190 6-1
Mark Eaton 4 D 5/6/1977 215 6-1
Michael Grabner 40 RW 10/5/1987 185 6-0
Travis Hamonic 3 D 8/16/1990 203 6-2
Milan Jurcina 27 D 6/7/1983 253 6-4
Andrew MacDonald 47 D 9/7/1986 196 6-1
Matt Martin 17 LW 3/8/1989 210 6-3
Al Montoya 35 G 2/13/1985 203 6-2
Mike Mottau 10 D 3/19/1978 190 6-0
Matt Moulson 26 LW 11/1/1983 205 6-1
Evgeni Nabokov 20 G 7/25/1975 200 6-0
Nino Niederreiter 25 RW 9/8/1992 205 6-2
Frans Nielsen 51 C 4/24/1984 184 6-0
Kyle Okposo 21 RW 4/16/1988 205 6-0
Jay Pandolfo 29 LW 12/27/1974 190 6-1
P.A. Parenteau 15 LW 3/24/1983 193 6-0
Rhett Rakhshani 49 RW 3/6/1988 190 5-10
Marty Reasoner 16 C 2/26/1977 205 6-1
Dylan Reese 42 D 8/29/1984 201 6-1
Brian Rolston 11 LW 2/21/1973 215 6-2
Steve Staios 24 D 7/28/1973 200 6-1
Mark Streit 2 D 12/11/1977 197 6-0
John Tavares 91 C 9/20/1990 202 6-0
Tim Wallace 36 RW 8/6/1984 207 6-1
Calvin de Haan 44 D 5/9/1991 187 6-1

Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Warlord2_small Mark D

Lighthouse_hockey_logo_2_medium_small Keith Quinn

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Hg_small Chris McNally

Master of FIGs and Power Tablature

Icon3_small ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein

71096_479208120482_1257968_n_small David Hanssen