Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jim Irsay: We Can Make It Work With Peyton Manning

How the three-headed monster affected Islanders' stats

Editor's Note: More interesting work from BenHasna, who gives us some food for thought inside the numbers of guys like Kyle Okposo, Bruno Gervais, Blake Comeau and -- well pretty much the whole team...

In some of my recent comments about certain players I talked about how the goalies affected their individual stats. I found for example that Kyle Okposo's bad plus/minus was largely caused by the fact that Martin Biron struggled horribly when KO was on the ice. KO was only -3 combined with Dwayne Roloson and Rick DiPietro, but -15 with Biron, who stopped only 85.37% of the pucks when KO was on the ice.

There are a few similarly interesting cases and I thought some might want to take a look at all numbers, although we honestly can't draw too many conclusions about the performances of the last season and certainly can't make any predictions about the future based on these numbers. But it's fun and if anything shows that +/- numbers can be distorted quite a bit. The big table and further explanations follow after the jump.  

Star-divide

Before talking about what kind of conclusions we can take and we cannot take, let's look at the big table first. It shows every player except for those who played only a couple of games or never got significant ice-time, such as Klementyev or Rechlicz for example. The data is as always provided by the great sites of Vic Ferrari. It includes even-strength numbers of all 82 games, obviously excluding empty-net situations.

 

 

Roloson

Biron

DiPietro

overall

 

 

EVSV%

+/-

EVSV%

+/-

EVSV%

+/-

EVSV%

+/-

2

Streit

93.08%

13

88.35%

-8

91.89%

-3

91.52%

2

4

Flood

90.91%

1

74.07%

-5

       -

0

78.95%

-4

7

Hunter

93.81%

2

92.98%

-1

97.67%

4

93.99%

5

8

Gervais

91.02%

-8

90.10%

-6

91.18%

-5

90.78%

-19

10

Park

90.42%

-8

92.13%

1

88.64%

-4

90.83%

-11

11

Thompson

90.00%

-6

89.71%

-7

75.00%

-2

89.35%

-15

12

Bailey

92.31%

4

92.00%

-1

95.24%

3

92.49%

6

13

Schremp

90.70%

2

93.65%

0

95.56%

-2

92.41%

0

14

Gillies

82.35%

-3

91.67%

1

       -

0

86.21%

-2

15

Tambellini

91.54%

-4

90.24%

-4

100.00%

0

91.12%

-8

16

Sim

91.41%

-3

93.18%

1

95.56%

-2

92.38%

-4

20

Bergenheim

93.40%

1

88.97%

-3

91.67%

-2

91.53%

-4

21

Okposo

90.77%

-1

85.37%

-15

85.37%

-2

88.68%

-18

24

Martinek

93.75%

2

93.24%

-4

       -

0

93.51%

-2

25

Sutton

90.84%

-2

94.53%

-3

88.68%

1

91.65%

-4

26

Moulson

91.38%

5

92.98%

-3

92.68%

1

91.96%

3

28

Jackman

91.93%

-2

93.46%

-2

       -

0

92.54%

-4

32

Witt

89.01%

-10

93.16%

-7

81.82%

-2

90.28%

-19

38

Hillen

91.58%

-2

91.01%

-6

88.24%

1

91.21%

-7

42

Reese

89.74%

-1

92.98%

5

       -

0

91.11%

4

44

Meyer

88.35%

-7

94.44%

5

94.59%

-2

90.83%

-4

46

Martin

90.00%

0

92.31%

-1

       -

0

91.30%

-1

47

MacDonald

95.14%

9

91.30%

-1

91.18%

-2

93.33%

6

51

Nielsen

93.26%

7

88.19%

-9

95.56%

3

92.03%

1

56

Kohn

92.86%

-2

90.63%

0

100.00%

0

92.96%

-2

57

Comeau

89.25%

0

91.06%

2

82.98%

-8

89.06%

-6

58

Joensuu

96.97%

2

100.00%

3

       -

0

98.04%

5

91

Tavares

90.64%

-3

91.10%

-6

84.62%

-2

90.40%

-11

93

Weight

93.98%

4

95.31%

2

87.23%

-5

93.03%

1

 

overall

91.52%

-2

91.15%

-15

91.01%

-6

91.36%

-23

 

Thanks to particularly this work of Tyler Dellow, we know a bit about even-strength save-percentage or more precisely about PDO, which is EVSV% plus even-strength shooting-percentage, on the team level. The idea there is that any particularly high or low numbers are not sustainable. We don't know a whole lot about these numbers on the individual level, though. It's not unlikely that the range is a little wider and that a particularly bad or extremely talented player is able to influence these numbers. But it's definitely not something that stands out when looking at the EVSV% of all players. Excellent (two-way) players like Crosby, Kesler, Okposo, etc. are towards the bottom of that list, whereas a few mediocre players rank at the top.

Even Brendan Witt managed to put together a relatively healthy 90.28% this season. And if we expected someone to make life really hard for the goaltenders, it probably would be Witt, who definitely wasn't on NHL level anymore this season and thus would be expected to allow more quality chances than other defenders. He certainly hurt his team and meant additional work for the goalies, but judging from these numbers here, the chances they gave up with Witt on the ice were not necessarily of higher quality than with everyone else.

However, luck seems to be what mostly drives this number here and it's probably fair to attribute some bad luck to everyone with a particularly bad number. That of course also means that we can't fault anyone. Biron's horrible number with Okposo for example was just bad luck/fluke. Biron proved with other guys that he is able to stop 91%+ of the pucks and Okposo proved his play doesn't pull down the numbers with Roloson for example. But it obviously means that Okposo's final -18 was almost entirely caused by bad luck. He could easily have been at around evens with an average save percentage.

 

Some interesting results

That's what we can do with these numbers therefore - tell who probably suffered a bit from bad luck last season. I'll present a few of the most interesting results below, but the table is of course pretty straight forward. As mentioned, most of the numbers don't mean a whole lot, but it's fun to look at them and might be interesting to get back to them at some point during the next season.

Blake Comeau's final -6 was affected heavily by the time he spent together with DiPietro. He went -8 in those few matches with DP, who stopped only 82.98% of the pucks with Comeau on the ice. Biron and Roloson were slightly below average with Comeau, too, and thus Comeau could easily have finished as a plus player last season.

Andrew MacDonald benefited from an enormous 95.14% with Roloson (+9) and was overall lucky to finish as a plus-player, as he was -3, at exactly average save percentages, with Biron and DiPietro combined.

Besides Jesse Joensuu (98.04%), in of course a very small sample size, Trent Hunter had the highest EVSV% with overall 93.99%. All three goalies did particularly well with Hunter on the ice. But that as said doesn't necessarily mean Hunter played outsanding hockey. It probably was just luck, although Hunter led the team already in 2008-09. He finished towards the bottom in 2007-08, though.

Mark Streit and Frans Nielsen have similar numbers, although they didn't spend particularly much time together. Streit had the same amount of ice-time with the other centers. Both however did particularly well with Roloson (around 93%) and struggled with Biron (around 88%). Streit, Nielsen as well as Dylan Reese and Matt Moulson were the only players who finished as plus-players without benefiting from particularly high save percentages.

The numbers of Freddy Meyer are just the other way around. Roloson struggled with Freddy (88.35%, -7), but Biron was excellent (94.44%, +5) with him.

Bruno Gervais had quite consistent numbers with all three goalies - consistently bad numbers, actually. All three goalies had roughly average save percentages with Gervais, but Bruno still finished -19 overall.

Submitted FanPosts do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog or SB Nation. If you're reading this statement, you pass the fine print legalese test. Four stars for you.

Comment 23 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great stuff Ben

Thanks so much for digging these up and posting him. That Okposo figure in front of Biron is eye-opening. Interesting to see Nielsen’s numbers similarly affected but to a lesser degree.

Definitely a fun way to look at it.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 17, 2010 2:06 AM EDT reply actions  

+1

Heck, +5, Ben. It’s another piece to the puzzle – who played well, with whom, which skaters helped their goalies most and vice-versa. Really great stuff.

My latest contract is for 31 years.

by mikb on Aug 17, 2010 11:12 AM EDT reply actions  

Nice!!

Is it possible to do this with the defensemn that played with both rolodon and Dipietro for a full season? (not sure if we even have any). For example gervais 06-07 Dipietro vs gervais 09-10 roll-on. I’m interested in seeing if the “puck moving goalie” negatively impacts the D. But I think between DPs injuries and the defense injury carousel we have it will probably be impossible. I think that Witt and Gervais may be the only guys, and Witt was subject to wear and tear and Bruno had one anomaly good season.

by Keith Quinn on Aug 17, 2010 11:40 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Sutton, Meyer, Gervais, Hillen and Streit were the only guys who played 50+ games, Streit was the only player with 80+ games, Bruno with 71 and Hillen with 69.

I think we talked about DP’s puck moving ability during the season. I think we sort of agreed that DiPietro’s passes helped the team get out of the defensive zone. Due to most of the dmen not being especially well at moving the puck (Hillen I believe was out for most of DP’s starts).

Dominik signed me for 20 years, and all I got was a press conference and a voided contract...
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Aug 17, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

I guess an interesting way to look at Puck Handling goalie would be to see if the Islanders had better Zone starts with DiPietro or Rollie/Biron.

Dominik signed me for 20 years, and all I got was a press conference and a voided contract...
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Aug 17, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

They did indeed have better zone starts with DiPietro. But for now, I’d be careful to attribute that to his puck handling skills. I have no idea really and it sure might have an effect, but the sample size is very small of course and the whole team simply might have played better hockey and driven the play up the ice better in those few games with DP.

EV defensive zone starts – EV offensive zone starts
DiPietro: 109-109=0
Roloson: 716-585=131
Biron: 349-296=53

by BenHasna on Aug 18, 2010 7:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

correction

Sorry, I messed that up completely and somehow left out a good part of the season. Just forget those numbers above, please. But there seems to be something wrong with the data anyway, so I struggle to get the right numbers.

by BenHasna on Aug 18, 2010 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

next try

I hope I’ve finally sorted things out and will give it another try. Turns out that the numbers above were relatively close to what should hopefully be the correct numbers indeed. But again, the sample size is certainly too small to draw any conclusions regarding DP’s puck handling skill really reducing defensive zone draws.

EV defensive zone starts – EV offensive zone starts; OPCT
DiPietro: 109-109=0; 50%
Roloson: 737-609=128; 45.25%
Biron: 373-332=41; 47.09%

by BenHasna on Aug 18, 2010 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

For sure

DP played so few games, I’d bet his paint-by-numbers easy shutout of the Devils skewed a lot of things. That one was a cakewalk.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 18, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I joined the lighthouse midway through swason

So I may have missed that. I have a different position though that applies to goalies (of the puck moving variety) and defensemen that comes from both playing and observing.

While DP may have helped with the occasional “outlet pass” or “home run” pass that resulted in a breakaway. I felt like more often, he missed, and there would be a lit of chasing.

Here’s why. When I was playing, if the d or goalie missed an outlet pass, generally it misses a forward who is returning to the defensive zone. This forces the forward to turn and chase the puck back o the neutral zone where they are now facing an onrushing forward or defenseman with speed in the opposite direction. Now it is very easy to make a diagonal pass or sidestep the forward and/or defense and return to the offensive zone. If they make it past the d, your forwards must collapse down low to contain, and now there is less if an opportunity to get out of your zone and d may end up out of position coring forwards. All of this chaos because of seeing an opportunity for a 100 foot pass now leaves that line exhausted because they are chasing the play and this becomes a huge problem
when you have the long change. Eventually, players look like they’re standing still, because they are essentially watching the puck go past them in either direction by a desperate defenseman attempting to clear, and an opportunistic member of the other team continuing to push the puck deep.

I agree with the poster who said an examination of “zone time” might point some of this out. In my experience though, we weren’t so much caught in our own zone as much as we were chasing in the neutral zone. What should really be looked at is possession time in the neutral zone, but I’m not sure that’s possible.

Hope that makes sense…so hard to express in writing how a hockey play looks in your head!

by Keith Quinn on Aug 17, 2010 12:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I agree overall with the concepts your laying out — and particularly when DP hasn’t played and the defense isn’t used to him, I think overhandling creates problems. But I remember during DP’s starts there were some noticeable phases where everyone was on the same page and he seemed to be making up for a weak D by getting to the puck and dishing it out before they could get hemmed in. (Of course now I’m really busy and can’t look up everything, but just take my word for it, bwahaha.)

In other words, the benefit wasn’t so much initiating a dangerous breakout (which seems like once in a blue moon) but rather alleviating some of the constant pressure of the opposition’s forecheck. At least in theory that’s when DP’s much-ballyhooed puckhandling actually has some effect.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 17, 2010 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

“In other words, the benefit wasn’t so much initiating a dangerous breakout (which seems like once in a blue moon) but rather alleviating some of the constant pressure of the opposition’s forecheck.”

And when it’s working it’s pretty, and when it’s not, it’s atrocious…and I guess since we’ve been bad and young for a while, we’ve gad more atrocious. I’m sure that there were even differences based on type of team we were playing “trapping” vs “traditional”. We probably did worse against trapping considering the neutral zone congestion.

by Keith Quinn on Aug 17, 2010 1:42 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

+/- swings

Its interesting to play with numbers, and right about now in the middle of August thats just about the only thing to do if you are a NYI or overall hockey fan.
Any explination why Nielson had a 16 point swing with Roloson on the positeve side?
Same for Streit, he had a +13 with Roloson and 21 point swing.
Conversly Meyer had 12 point swing with a +5 rating with Biron in net. (ps I did not really consdider these numbers wit DP in net)

Anybody have any thoughts?

by Russel Ginart on Aug 17, 2010 12:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks for this post. This is an interesting piece and I was surprised..shocked really, to see how different the numbers are for a player depending on who is in net behind him. Are there any conclusions we can draw from this or do you think that this is the results are random.

by MatthewM11 on Aug 17, 2010 3:39 PM EDT reply actions  

there's a lot of noise in the numbers

In general you’d like to see more of a sample to be able to compare the effect of the goalies on the players… especially Biron’s small workload. Two or three bad games can kill the numbers. Since Biron’s gone to caddy for the Rags, that opportunity is gone. We still have a year for Roli and RDP comparisons, however.

My latest contract is for 31 years.

by mikb on Aug 17, 2010 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s what I was thinking, too small of a sample size to draw definitive conclusions but very interesting none the less.

by MatthewM11 on Aug 17, 2010 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Biron was given a big enough amount of playing time to survey,

DP only had 7 starts, so his stats aren’t completely fair to sample, but I’m all for the Biron-26starts and Rollie-49starts comparison. Say what you want about how these numbers came to be, but they did. Rollie was a lot better goalie then Biron this year, both had bad streaks, but Biron as a whole was worse all around, even with a bit smaller workload. Hands down, Rollie is better and the reason the isles have so much trust in their goaltending going into this year with him and an injury-prone dp and 2 young no experience backups beyond that.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Aug 17, 2010 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

But mikb had a good point about a few bad games skewing the numbers. That is especially true when looking at individual forwards, ie: Okposo’s splits. I think what is most telling is the bottom number; the goalies overall plus minus.

by MatthewM11 on Aug 17, 2010 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, that’s not entirely telling, either, because how many goals the players score given which goalie is in net has of course an influence on that +/- figure, too. And it’s really not the goalie’s fault when the players don’t make their shots. And Roloson had by far the best help of them all in that regard.

EV shooting percentage:
Roloson: 8.75%
Biron: 7.08%
DiPietro: 5.59%

EV save percentage is more telling, I’d say, although you’re sure right about bad games skewing the numbers, or small sample sizes in general. Some people say you need around five seasons from a goalie to be able to estimate the true talent. So, just from these numbers, we certainly can’t draw any conclusions regarding who the better goalie is. Looking at career numbers, Biron seems to be the slightly better goalie than Roloson, actually. But I’d sure admit Roloson did a better job with the Islanders last season. Perhaps not by as much as it’s been reported everywhere, though.

Regarding the huge differences for certain players depending on who is in net behind him, I think that’s all pretty much random. We’re talking about relatively small amounts of shots here. Roloson faced 457 shots with Streit on the ice and around 300 with other busy guys (Gervais, Okposo, JT, etc.). For Biron, it’s 220 with Streit and around 150 with the other top-line players. For DP, it’s 68 and around 45.
It mostly puts some +/- figures into perspective, I’d say. For example, there’s really no need whatsoever to be worried about Okposo’s bad +/-. That’ll almost certainly not happen again.

by BenHasna on Aug 18, 2010 8:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

EV save percentage is more telling, I’d say

When I first read these numbers I was focused on the plus minus and didn’t really pay attention to the save percentage numbers. Its really interesting, especially the disparity between some players and goalies. Flood with Roloson versus Biron for example. But of course there we are dealing with a really small sample size.

Biron seems to be the slightly better goalie than Roloson, actually. But I’d sure admit Roloson did a better job with the Islanders last season. Perhaps not by as much as it’s been reported everywhere, though.

I would agree with that. I thought Biron would get the bulk of playing time going into last season.

by MatthewM11 on Aug 18, 2010 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not so sure

If I play 60 games and have four bad ones, and you play the other 20 and have three bad ones, then your numbers are going to suffer more. A small sample is easier to skew based on outlier results. For example, say we both have a 2.50 GAA. I start and get lit – five goals in 30 minutes. You come to the rescue and… well… get lit too, another five goals.

At the end of the game, my GAA is up to 2.57. Yours is up to 2.86. Whaa? Simple – I’ve played fifty full games, you’ve only played 10. That disastrous half-game shoves your small sample way off.

Like Ben said below – for a true evaluation you need a larger sample to help level off the luck and keep outlier games (good or bad) from unfairly impacting the overall picture. It works both ways, too – think about how many young goalies looked like the ghost of Sawchuck in their first season, and were then exposed; or backups on great teams who were given the keys elsewhere and promptly drove the team into a ditch.

I will agree that Roli outplayed Biron this season… not necessarily that he is the superior goalie overall. I’d look at both their careers to calculate that, and a variety of numbers to see if the effect is consistent. (And actually, I’d say Roli was a bit better overall, he’s been underrated for most of his career, but Biron is a perfectly serviceable keeper of the Osgood mold.)

My latest contract is for 31 years.

by mikb on Aug 18, 2010 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

think about how many young goalies looked like the ghost of Sawchuck in their first season, and were then exposed; or backups on great teams who were given the keys elsewhere and promptly drove the team into a ditch.

That’s a good point. Look at Yann Davis last year. He had a better GAA and SV% then Marty B. Before him it was Scott Clemenson. Corey Schwab had a 0.63 gaa and .971 save percentage in 03-04. Vezina! Oh wait, he only played 3 games. On a side note I just looking at Hasek’s stats and I never realized that Marty Biron and Dwayne Roloson played together in Buffalo.

by MatthewM11 on Aug 18, 2010 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Heh, the thread format suckered me

And by “Ben said below”… of course I mean above. :P

My latest contract is for 31 years.

by mikb on Aug 18, 2010 10:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip and shoulder surgery not required.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

890_1__small
The defenseman that could be... +POLL

Recent FanPosts

Kevinwriterpic_small
Dreger: Parenteau Shelves Contract Talks Till After Season
Small
2012 NHL Mock Draft #1
Small
2012 Playoffs - Its time to take the next step.
Small
Isles Missing Grit, Not Toughness
X-wing_small
Time to Sell on Evgeni Nabokov
Small
No toughness
Kevinwriterpic_small
2012 NHL Draft Prospect Profile: Matt Dumba
Small
Reeser Out 2-3 Weeks, Who's next?
One_smith03_small
Nielsen and Tavares Happily Drink the Kool-Aid! So What's Our Problem with UFA's?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Garth Snow screwed this one up because he should have:

  318 votes | Results

Isles Reading

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New York Rangers 55 37 13 5 79
Philadelphia 56 31 18 7 69
Pittsburgh 56 32 19 5 69
New Jersey 56 32 20 4 68
New York Islanders 56 24 24 8 56

(updated 2.15.2012 at 8:59 AM EST)

New York Islanders Roster

# Pos. DOB W H
Josh Bailey 12 LW 10/2/1989 190 6-1
Rick DiPietro 39 G 9/19/1981 190 6-1
Mark Eaton 4 D 5/6/1977 215 6-1
Michael Grabner 40 RW 10/5/1987 185 6-0
Travis Hamonic 3 D 8/16/1990 203 6-2
Milan Jurcina 27 D 6/7/1983 253 6-4
Andrew MacDonald 47 D 9/7/1986 196 6-1
Matt Martin 17 LW 3/8/1989 210 6-3
Al Montoya 35 G 2/13/1985 203 6-2
Mike Mottau 10 D 3/19/1978 190 6-0
Matt Moulson 26 LW 11/1/1983 205 6-1
Evgeni Nabokov 20 G 7/25/1975 200 6-0
Aaron Ness 55 D 5/18/1990 170 5-10
Nino Niederreiter 25 RW 9/8/1992 205 6-2
Frans Nielsen 51 C 4/24/1984 184 6-0
Kyle Okposo 21 RW 4/16/1988 205 6-0
Jay Pandolfo 29 LW 12/27/1974 190 6-1
P.A. Parenteau 15 LW 3/24/1983 193 6-0
Marty Reasoner 16 C 2/26/1977 205 6-1
Dylan Reese 42 D 8/29/1984 201 6-1
Brian Rolston 11 LW 2/21/1973 215 6-2
Steve Staios 24 D 7/28/1973 200 6-1
Mark Streit 2 D 12/11/1977 197 6-0
John Tavares 91 C 9/20/1990 202 6-0
Tim Wallace 36 RW 8/6/1984 207 6-1
Ty Wishart 6 D 5/19/1988 222 6-4
Calvin de Haan 44 D 5/9/1991 187 6-1

Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Warlord2_small Mark D

Lighthouse_hockey_logo_2_medium_small Keith Quinn

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Hg_small Chris McNally

Master of FIGs and Power Tablature

Icon3_small ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein

71096_479208120482_1257968_n_small David Hanssen