Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Wisniewski from the Ducks: Stockpiling D-men?

Islanders acquire Wisniewski...

Caught this on my feed when I was about to head out the door and immediately did a double take. It's an interesting pickup for all sorts of reasons...here are the ones that jump to the top of my mind:

- This is our third D-man acquisition of the offseason, following the signings of Eaton and Jurcina.

- He's on a one-year going into an RFA year, with a cap-hit of 2.8mil - moving us much closer to the salary floor. Capgeek has us at $38.98 million with 22 signed - Weight still doesn't have a contract on the books, of course. (Breakdown: 13 forwards counting Weight, 9 dmen, and Rolly and DiPi.) Wisniewski's 2.8mil leaves roughly 2mil for Weight before we hit the floor.

Star-divide

 

- This means we're not shopping for another goalie, Snow and Gordon must be feeling very comfortable with what we currently have in the system behind Rolly and DiPietro...assuming for the moment that DiPi is ready to go.

- It also looks like they're trying to address the Isles injury curses with dmen...considering that one of those 13 forwards is Gillies.

- Which leads into the consideration that Snow and Gordon feel good about the offensive guys coming up from Bridgeport when people inevitably lose a few games to injury. (Knock on wood that it's only a few here and there!)

- Sad thought: FMIV looks not to be back, with this move.

Here's his SBN profile: James Wisniewski

Based on his numbers, the SBN scouting info, and our current roster, he looks like he'll be 3rd pair and get some PP minutes on a point - thoughts?

 

On a side note, this is my first fanpost - let me know if I missed anything which should have been included, suggestions you might have, etc.

 

-MTBVibe

Submitted FanPosts do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog or SB Nation. If you're reading this statement, you pass the fine print legalese test. Four stars for you.

Comment 122 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Love this move for a few reasons

1. I think he is more of a 2nd pair with Eaton and Hillen can be with Martinek for a third pair. Or put Eaton/JW with Mart for a shutdown pair.
2. Gives Harmonic, De Haan, and Katic more time to develop
3. Puts us over the floor with Weight always important
4. Is only 26 so if he has a good year I hope we can sign him for 2-4 years and he can be part of a contending Islander team as a veteran blue liner in a third pairing
5. Makes the team better, simple as that

One question though. On cap geek it says he’s an RFA is that for next year or do we have to sign him for this year.

by rockhouse15 on Jul 30, 2010 9:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Very good points.

All of them. I love this move, we needed a physical presence somewhere on the D and finally got it.

On the FA thing, he is listed on nhl.com as a free agent, so I think we need to give him a contract, but I am honestly not sure.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 30, 2010 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

He already has a contract

The Ducks “settled” with him just before his arbitration hearing. I put “settled” in quotes (probably doing that too much lately) because it was obviously a figure that was too high for Anaheim, but one that the floor-is-the-limit Islanders could digest, even for a third-ish pair D.

I’m not a big fan of the player (I get the impression his decision-making program is missing some essential code), but the trade is fair value and helps, I guess. I’d like it better if I thought he would be an Islander beyond this year, but at $3.25 million right now and as a UFA next summer I’m not expecting that. I guess at this point I hope that in March I still want him to be an Islander.

Lighthouse Hockey: Adapting forecasts to the disturbance known as Nino.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Scary though...

The comments section looks like most were happy to see him go. I haven’t seenuch if him so can’t comment, but here’s the link to the SBN story.
www.anaheimcalling.com/2010/7/30/1597517/ducks-trade-wisniewski-to-islanders

by Keith Quinn on Jul 30, 2010 10:56 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I could care less what the ducks fans say

Shooting into shinpads, lol. The guy still put up 30pts in 60 games in his 2nd “full” season in the nhl “shooting into shinpads”, so I’d take it. He plays physical, adds much needed offense, . I remember him from the hockey playoffs a year ago on anaheim. He was a very physical presence that plays good d and seems to play fine under pressure. 5’11’’ 205 is big enough for me to be on any line, especially with the way he plays. His penalty minutes were racked up with 20mins from fighting, so he isn’t a penalty/hot-head liability. And we was getting top 4 to top 2 minutes in anaheim last year, so he isn’t that bad at all. Great trade and much needed.

As Anacurt said, now all we need is 1 bottom 6 forward that’s somewhat productive to definitely keep nino in juniors next year.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Then you couldn’t care less then. ;) (Sorry, just being a pedantic jerk.)

I would have loved to hear the Ducks describe him during the arbitration hearing. I get the feeling they didn’t like him, or they expected him to be something he is not. Hopefully with fewer minutes he’ll make an impact here.

Lighthouse Hockey: Adapting forecasts to the disturbance known as Nino.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I’m not perfect with grammar, but I’m not horrible.

No matter what the ducks said about him, he got $3.25mil for his 1 year contract this year, so that says something. Definitely getting paid like a top 4 and probably is looked upon as a top 4 guy now. I’d give him top 4 minutes just from what I’ve seen and heard about him. Looks like a solid all around d-man, not a superstar but definitely solid. And that was 30pts in 69games, not 60. Still very productive for a d-man though, something we could use with streit on powerplay options from time to time.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

:)

I was just talking to my better half about being a pedant (“Is it jive or jibe?” “Here here or hear hear?”), so I had to jump in… (We also both agreed we are dorks for even discussing it.)

Man, if he provides another dangerous PP option opposite Streit, that would be sooo worth it.

Lighthouse Hockey: Adapting forecasts to the disturbance known as Nino.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

No problem.

I don’t care about being corrected by Grammar Nazi’s, lol.

And wiz should definitely get some pp time. There’s definitely a good possibility he repeats his 30pt season and scouting reports says : accurate shot, plenty of offensive capability, including the skills to play the point on the power play, is aggressive by nature, skates very well, and is at his best in an up-tempo system. Imo, he’s definitely a lock on getting some good pp time and putting up good offensive numbers. He should have no problem getting a starting power play job out of camp paired with streit at the point. Should make a very interesting power play this season for us having 2 good d-weapons on the pp and as said, much needed offense to help out the young guns lighting the lamp.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

This should mean the PP doesn’t look lost without Weight (assuming he signs, but isn’t ready to play by Opening Night) like it often did last year. Gotta have someone besides Streit at the point who commands respect from the PK. I hope Hillen one day gets there, but he doesn’t scare them into slowing down yet.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

yep

Weight is definitely not going to be missed on the pp now on opening day, not even sure he will be needed at the point anymore. Hillen has the potential to possibly take a spot over one day, but with what we hear about de haan, he IS our definite future powerplay point man hands down once he’s nhl ready. I hear good things about hamonic’s shot too, but not sure he’s future nhl power play potential yet. All depends on how streit ages and if he wants to stay with us. What a GREAT signing he turned out to be. Fell in love with him the first time I saw how he played.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I swooned over Streit right away too. Thought he was a good signing, but he shattered my expectations and quickly.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 1:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Forgot that point

The fact we now have a second big shot to put on the power play is huge. It keeps Okposo on the wing with Tavares and Nielsen on the powerplay. Also if we want to go that way we can now put Weight on the second PP with Hillen on the point which gives us more depth on special teams.

by rockhouse15 on Jul 31, 2010 7:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

No doubt

Just looking at the talent and “handsiness” of everyone, they should be able to put together to good PP units.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

"... to good PP units"

Is this the “jerk” part of “pedantic jerk” you were mentioning? ;-)

But while we’re on this whole spelling/saying/speaking kick, does our new man pronounce the W’s in his name as V’s, as his ancestors would? Do we have another Mariusz in our midst?

Warning: This post may cause Yashin Rashes, Spano Spasms, and Dingle Milburys.

by ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles on Jul 31, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Is this the "jerk" part of "pedantic jerk" you were mentioning?

Nice! I love it, well done.

Good question. I say we start doing it with a “v” sound regardless. A habit I got into (which Mrs. Lighthouse can’t seem to break me of) is pronouncing all hockey names by their proper roots rather than the Anglo-cized version. My dad, a linguist, always stubbornly did this when I was a kid and now I can’t shake it.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 1, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also love this move

First off this is a steal. 3rd round pick that we get to choose (we have ours and Colorados so we get to send them the worst of the two). He seems to have made improvements every season. He picked up a load of assists last year (27) and is in general a good puck mover who should see some PP time. Ducks actually signed him earlier in the day on a 1 year deal so he’s signed but UFA next summer. This makes it close to certain that Hamonic gets another year to develop (and completely certain on DeHaan). The improvement to our PP alone makes it worth the worst of our third round picks in 2011. The thing that concerns me the most is his 8 game suspension on a retaliatory hit. Does this make him a hothead and liability?

Still want them to add a forward (or 2) but any move that generally improves the team is good. I think we have the lead for Stempniak and he fits our current mold. Players who have shown signs of real talent but just need the right opportunity to shine.

by Anarcurt on Jul 30, 2010 11:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks for the FanPost, MTB

Nice job. Saved me some work on a Friday night!

Lighthouse Hockey: Adapting forecasts to the disturbance known as Nino.

by Dominik on Jul 30, 2010 11:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Well it looks like the Bridgeport D is going to be stocked

Streit – Andy Mac – Martinek – Eaton – Jurnicia – Wisniewski – Gervais should all be on the team starting the season. That means a lot of guys who did a pretty good job playing in the NHL last season are going to be back in the AHL.

Wheel of Location, Turn Turn Turn. Tell us the location that we will play.
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Jul 31, 2010 12:07 AM EDT reply actions  

Plus Hillen

This makes me confident that Hamonic and de Haan would have to walk on water to make the team out of camp, and in my book that’s a good thing.

With the Bridgeport guys, I’m sure the Islanders ambulance will mean they get some time. I think Katic is still rehabbing his shoulder, too.

Lighthouse Hockey: Adapting forecasts to the disturbance known as Nino.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I knew I was forgetting someone from the team, I still wish they would have kept around Meyer, I liked the kid.

Wheel of Location, Turn Turn Turn. Tell us the location that we will play.
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Jul 31, 2010 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m surprised meyer hasn’t been signed by anyone yet. Could definitely be a solid #7 d-man or possible bottom 2. Great all around player, just lacks some size.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

I hope he gets an NHL job

He certainly earned my trust with his final quarter. You’ve gotta love an undersized underdog who hits like a cannonball.

But he has time. So many guys still unsigned, and arbitrations like Wisniewski’s haven’t all shaken out yet — and with everyone tight on their budget, those rulings are a big deal.

Lighthouse Hockey: Adapting forecasts to the disturbance known as Nino.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hmm

I wouldn’t bet on jurcina making the team out of camp, at least the starting lineup. Hillen is better all around then him except for size and hillen showed last year he is definitely nhl ready and an offensive tool that we need. Jurcina has for most of his career been a 7th d-man, so I wouldn’t change that now.

As for Gervais, his play has plummetted bad. He’s easily our #8 d-man if we don’t like someone in the minors more then him. And because of this, our ahl team should be pretty good.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'll give Snow this

He has completely reshaped the blueline. A year late in my book (I was really not a fan of the blueline going into last year), but it’s nice to see them make the effort and giving themselves more options. Hopefully it’s an improvement.

Lighthouse Hockey: Adapting forecasts to the disturbance known as Nino.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting line from the press release
“We see James as a key addition to our team and we feel our fans will connect with his style of play,” said Islanders General Manager Garth Snow. “He is a solid puck-moving defenseman who can bring an added element of toughness to our blue-line.”

I could be wrong, but I don’t think they always put a line like that in the press release. Granted press releases are pretty much paint-by-numbers (“I’ll take clause C and F please”), but a shout out to “fans connecting” is either code for “this guy likes to hit” or a subtle “We’re listening to you, stop thinking we don’t care” nod. Or both.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:43 AM EDT reply actions  

This is from Eaton’s press release

"With the addition of both Mark and Milan, we add both size and experience to our defense," Islanders General Manager, Garth Snow said. "Each played in winning environments the past few years and we look forward to them bringing that same element to our dressing room."

So it doesn’t seem to be in ever release.

Wheel of Location, Turn Turn Turn. Tell us the location that we will play.
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Jul 31, 2010 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

We need drinking game

Match player in Column A with the press release clause in Column B…

Thinking through this, I bet Wisniewski was on Snow’s radar for a while. There were a lot of hints Anaheim didn’t want to pay him. It’s kind of funny: They played him like a top-pair guy (24 minutes!), but weren’t happy with the result and so didn’t want to pay him like a top-four guy, which is surely what he would have gotten in arbitration. Our gain.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know.

What more could they have asked for? They gave him top minutes and he put up 30pts while being a physical presence that plays on the power play and can play some decent d. And then, now doing pretty much everything you asked him with low pay, don’t want to reward him anything? Weird. I see him as a top 4 guy that should earn top 4 money.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

lol

Maybe he reads our forums or reads a lot of fan e-mails and suggestions. It was obvious we lacked a physical presence and player on our d-core. And who doesn’t like hitting defenseman that can put up points? It’s obvious to me. BUT, if he really wanted to help the fans, he’d try making a big trade splash pulling a fairly young 55pt+ forward from a team by giving up a 1st and 3rd round pick with a joensuu or martin or maybe even comeau/hunter to get a young offensive force to help us out NOW. We need em and I’d be fine with something like that. How much more of a farm system do we need? We easily have 2 should/will be top 6 forwards in nino and petrov and 2 should/will be d-men in hamonic and de haan with a lot of questionable possible future nhl’ers that will definitely fill out some of our future team. I say do this, if you are reading Garth, lol.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why didnt they give this money to Frolov?!

He would have been a better pickup. Geez it aint like we dont need the offense!

by Jethro9 on Jul 31, 2010 12:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Why didn’t they give the money to Volchenkov?

Because he decided to sign elsewhere. You can only throw so much money at a guy, if he’d rather play for a contender your out of luck.

Wheel of Location, Turn Turn Turn. Tell us the location that we will play.
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Jul 31, 2010 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Also, we need everything.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm sure garth offered frolov

a solid paycheck, he just didn’t wanna come. We reportedly had interest in him, so he most likely turned us down before or after he was given an offer. And it’s not like garth’s trying as others have stated. Reports say he gave tons of big names GOOD offers like volchenkov, martin, hamhuis, and kovalchuk. He’s doing his job, it just doesn’t seem like the isles are attracting any big names yet. But yes we need offense. I’m sure garth is trying to right now either:

A. Put some trade together for a solid bottom 6 guy
or
B. Talking to tons of bottom 6 free agents and talking numbers.

If he isn’t, he’s not doing his job, which seems highly unlikely up to this point.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

  Even as an Islanders’ fan…If I was hanging with Frolov, and his agent called and said the Isles made a nice offer…you know there would be some laughter there.
  In so much as I hate the Rags…if the agent next said the Rags offered one mill less…the reply would be “ok, lets go with that”

  We only want the best for the Islanders, and yet, you have to keep an open mind on the overall opinion of our team, the arena and the franchise. It sucks. Everyone in the league knows it. So this years New York Islander’s team is the best team or ex goalie could hire.

I couldn’t resist. I laughed when I wrote that. LOL

Get out of the sticks, Charles, move to Queens!! Come, Get some respect a Professional team deserves!!

by Martys301 on Jul 31, 2010 7:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

wait a minute...............

are you telling me that IF Garth had offered Frolov 4 mil for 1 year he wouldnt have taken it?
He took 3 mil from the Rags. When youre in the position the Isles are in (with players not wanting to come here) you have to outbid the other teams. Im not convinced Garth did that.
How about a 2 year contract? 6.5mil for 2 years? Be aggressive dammitt!!

by Jethro9 on Jul 31, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

As said

We were interested. So he either laughed at us and turned us down before and offer was given or turned down our offer. It honestly could have been a 1yr 4mil, but who knows. He’s been trying to overpay big names to try and get them here but no luck. It will be interesting to see how frolov does anyway. He was in a bit of a decline last year and is a somewhat gamble, but definitely has the potential to be a starting top 6.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey ozzyfan

Do you have inside info from the organization? You seem pretty sure of yourself. Personally I doubt they offered Frolov 1yr 4mil, and that would be a disgrace.

by Jethro9 on Jul 31, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

No insider info

But when I read the isles have showed interest in a player and contacted their agent it usually is about contract talks and what the player is looking for. So based on that, I assume we were turned down before or after we gave him an offer, probably a very reasonable one too.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Personally I doubt they offered Frolov 1yr 4mil, and that would be a disgrace.

A disgrace? Really?

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 1, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Garth offered the most money to Hamhuis and Martin but they went elsewhere …its not always about the money

by kcNYI on Jul 31, 2010 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Free agency is like

Being drunk around closing time at the bar…whoever is still around looks real attractive, you buy some drinks, the lights come on or you sober up and realize you made a mistake. (hopefully not a long term one). Let’s not start buying guys like Frolov drinks or getting him pregnant…he may be ugly or have a bad personality in the morning…

by Keith Quinn on Jul 31, 2010 1:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

??

so you’d rather play it safe and miss the playoffs yet again?!?!?! Frolov would be a small gamble for 1 or 2 years.

by Jethro9 on Jul 31, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

SB Nation Scouting Report

Scouting Report
Assets

    * Has excellent size and reach. Can be an impact forward at both ends of the ice. Is great at maintaining possession of the puck in tight space and excels in the corners.

Flaws

    * Is inconsistent in all areas of the game and needs to do a better job of bringing his ‘A’ game to the rink more often. Passes up too many shots.

Career Potential

    * Inconsistent two-way winger.
    * Awards2002Played in the NHL YoungStars Game

Really just depends, if the only thing we are doing with a guy like Frolov is decreasing a kid’s playing time and development for the difference between 45 or 60 points (per guy) and being eliminated in the first round and losing draft spots, then no, I don’t want him, really at any cost. If Petrov is even close to making the team, I’d rather start to develop him, or Martin. The problem we always have is that we always have guys who “could be on the verge of breaking out”, or are too good for third line, not good enough for second line. This team is always a problem with finding a “fit”, because no one is or ever gets to what they “can be”, and usually our guys who reach potential would be third liners on another team. We are close to seeing what these guys will be/are and it will be exciting to see, It’s easy to find a guy to complement Iginla or Savard, but really who comlements Schremp or Nielsen? Honestly, for this team, I think the complements are from within the organization unless it’s a grand slam.

by Keith Quinn on Jul 31, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good points, but honestly

We could have easily used Frolov. At worst I see him as a 40pt player that puts up ~20 goals next season. And that’s a bad season. He honestly isn’t much of a gamble, but is a gamble only in the concept that you are giving a player that can be anywhere from a 40pt/20goal player up to a 35goal/70pt player(which he once was) for $3-$4mil for 1-2 years. He’s off the market now, but he wasn’t close to being a high risk guy. And when you look at the lines, the only people right now he would be taking time from in the top 9 would be a pareantu/joensuu/martin/nino or rare chance of a petrov who is in a bitch of a khl contract dilemma. Imo, martin and joensuu will compete for a bottom 3 spot with pareantu if they like him as a bottom 3. Both JJ/martin/pareantu look like they aren’t ready for a top 9 spot, but would definitely be adequate or more then adequate for a bottom 3 role. While nino could really use 1yr of development before being thrown on a team that at best will compete for a bottom playoff spot. That’s how I look at it. I see no harm no foul in letting us get 1 playoff appearance for all the young guns to see what it’s like at the cost of rushing someone that should still be developping another 1/2yr-1yr+ in the minors. Imho, none seem nhl ready to throw up more then 30pts in a full season right now AT BEST which are team seems to be full of(30pt players that is), so I think they should left in the minor leagues for more developping.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Botta has tweeted that the Isles are in negotiation with Eric Belanger

Good or bad move to sign him? I’d like Stepniak as well if we can add those two we should really compete for the playoffs

by rockhouse15 on Jul 31, 2010 7:39 AM EDT reply actions  

I've heard that off and on

Belanger is quality. That would create a nice problem down the middle. I’m not really high on Stempniak but the more the merrier, I guess.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

True that it would create some kind of a problem down the middle, but on the other hand they actually need to add a center in my opinion indeed. I still think Park hasn’t been replaced entirely. His capability to take defensive zone draws, particularly on the PK, to play some tough minutes and just his overall versatility might be missed on the current roster.
I’m not sure about Belanger’s quality overall, but these areas are of course where he is helpful indeed. So, this signing wouldn’t surprise me and could for these particular reasons turn out to be a good one, although I wouldn’t expect Belanger to be spectacular.

by BenHasna on Jul 31, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Belanger?

Who’s spot would he be taking? He’s a center and we are already overloaded there. I can’t possibly see why we’d go after him. He’s definitely not taking nielsen’s spot, but could take schremp’s spot if they want schremp as a reserve center because he’s still young and unproven for the most part. Looks like a good 2-way player. Seems to be a similar player to nielsen, but not as good from what I can see.

As for Stepniak, plays either wing, so that helps. His best career year was last year, could be a fluke or he might have finally found his scoring touch. Who knows for sure. Either way he at worst looks like a 40pt guy that adds some offense. I’m not sure where he’d go, but I’d be guessing he and comeau would be fighting for that top 6 spot on Tavares’s right wing and the loser goes into the bottom 6 rotation. Looks like a solid 2-way guy that has decent scoring potential. I’d pick him up for depth without question and leave both JJ and matt martin in the minors for the start of the year. Gives them more time to find their strides which I think they need.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is anyone concerned...

That half ignite defense is now learning a new system that no one else in the league plays? While I like the signings, you have to think that each pairing will be effected. Can they play the system? (at least last year’s injury replacements played the system at Bridgeport) Whose minutes get cut (I’m sure it wasn’t ideal to have Hillen and A-Mac playing so many big minutes) does this stunt their growth a bit?
I’m assuming that you try to sign Wisniewski long term and let Jurcina, Martinek and Gervais walk to make room next year for Hamonic and DeHaan. But we are looking at a few years in a row of Mix and match on the D (not to mention the injury bug). Possible new goalie next year too. Could be interesting, but you don’t hear about “chemistry” as much with defenseman as much as forwards so it may be fine!

by Keith Quinn on Jul 31, 2010 9:32 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Supposed to read

Half of our defense. I have to be better about proofing when sending from iphone! Sorry!

by Keith Quinn on Jul 31, 2010 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good points

I think the new players will mesh fine though. All top 6 now seem to have the capability to adapt to the system. Minutes shouldn’t be that hard to figure. After the first few games, then it’s mending time. Hillen and a-mac are fine imo. They showed last year they played very well with the tasks they were given, so no questions there for me.

I’d definitely sign wiz to a long term deal at 26. Kid has a lot of promise if he can fix . I’d let martinek walk at 35 unless you want a cheap viable defenseman that’s injury prone. Jurcina was obviously a we need someone to fill the spot signing. And Gervais needs to pick up his game in the minors or he could turn into a career ahl guy. He had some promise though at one point being a full time nhler. That being said, Hamonic will be ready next year without a doubt in my mind. Reports say the kid is working hard on his game and wants to be bigger and stronger too (he’s already 6’2’’ 220lbs how big does he want to get, lol). De haan could be a possibility next year too, but he might need more time. That’s a big question there on when do you move him up. Other then that, we are going to be an ok d-core and no longer the laughable one we used to be. BUT, honestly we need 1 big guy to add as a shutdown d-man sooner or later. Our tallest defenseman without the meak jurcina is 6’2’’ and our heaviest is 205lbs. We still lack size and need it one day, obviously hamonic will help that, but every top 6 d-core needs at least 1 220lb d-man that’s 6’3’’ or bigger. NOT JURCINA though.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

When talking about Jurica, keep in mind that he played under Gordon for the Providence Bruins (AHL). I’m personally not convinced of him and would indeed have him pretty low in the depth-chart right now, but Gordon sure is and I don’t think they signed him just to fill a spot. They might know or certainly hope he’ll thrive in Gordon’s system and perhaps expect him to perform better than ever.

by BenHasna on Jul 31, 2010 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

interesting

Didn’t know that. I see a reason for the signing now, but still hope hillen makes the starting d over him at the beginning of the season. Hillen just brings so much more to the table and has the potential to be a top 4 d-man in a year or 2 if he improves all around and still matures. Going to be interesting to see what d-lines gordon goes with off the bat.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Some guys are actually pretty effective players despite not being fan favorites. I suspect that is the case with Jurcina. The fans probably got frustrated with him because he doesn’t throw his considerable weight around as much as they would like. That doesn’t mean he’s not an effective player. His numbers show that he is fairly effective. You just need to realize that he plays the way he plays and appreciate what he brings.

by TMS on Aug 2, 2010 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eh

I wouldn’t call him pretty effective. Without question I believe he is a borderline nhl player, but he would just be a hell of a lot easier to categorize if he did more then put up 10pts per season on the best offensive team in the nhl with his full time up in the nhl. He’s also always put up bottom 2 or reserve borderline +/- numbers while up here too the last few seasons. Effective? I’m not really sure about that statwise or other.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Aug 2, 2010 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dare I say this was a 'win now' move?

The goal is to make the playoffs and I think Garth believes the maturation of the forwards has him thinking they are playoff caliber. It’s great to see attempt to get the D on par, which they just might be after this signing. I’d be surprised if he doesn’t come up with a serviceable, veteran goalie to add to the mix. Although he might’ve screwed himself by not trading Biron and letting him rot on the bench all season.

I noticed that Wiz was -5 on a pretty decent team last year. Was that a product of the QoC or is really just a guy who shoots into shinpads and lays the occasional hit?

(some potty mouths over on the Ducks blog. Stay classy Isles fans)

by Pauly C on Jul 31, 2010 10:10 AM EDT reply actions  

Wiz was a -5 on a team that was an overall -13. Not horrible. And don’t forget this was his 2nd full nhl season and they gave him top 2 minutes to boot in his spot. He had a lot of pressure on him and seemed to deal with it pretty good. That pronger trade left them hurting on D and wiz did as best he could I’d guess with his tools. Seems to be a top 4 guy though. Obviously has the offensive capability to be a top 2, but probably overall he’s a top 4 with his all around play.
And remember, if he honestly got 30pts in somewhat injury shortened season, then he must have been hitting his spots more then shooting into shinpads. And if the shinpads thing is true and not just remorse from ducks fans, then we have a possible 40pt d-man that plays physical now. Either way, I’m extremely pleased with this much needed pickup.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

It certainly seems he struggled to get his shots through in 08-09, when he had 3.9 of his shots blocked per 60 (5-on-5). He improved last season, though, and was right in the middle of the pack with 2.6, and e.g. equal to Mark Streit.

by BenHasna on Jul 31, 2010 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Still maturing

Great sign. Even with an overload of work given to him in his 2nd full year he improved his overall game. This could be something really nice in the future. An already top 4 guy that has a little room for improvement makes this trade look even better and the acquisition of him all the more important to our team.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

letting him rot on the bench all season

? He played in like 30 games and was our backup in the majority of the others- that is hardly “rotting”. Rick was not able to play, what were the Isles supposed to do, not have a 2nd goalie?

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Jul 31, 2010 10:41 AM EDT reply actions  

rotting

lol, he was given a ton of playing time as stated and he greatly underperformed for us. And what did you want to trade him for? A 4th round pick? Because that seemed like the best possible thing we were gonna get for him. I was reading his numbers, and if biron played a little better and made his win/loss column 50%, the isles finish at worst the 10th spot and are more heavily competing in the playoff race. But then again, no nino. Yeah, I’d prefer nino over a slight playoff run anyday :) .

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

How did you turn that into a Nino thing? I wasn’t saying they should’ve played Biron more b/c then they might’ve made the playoffs. I’m just saying by not trading him when he was clearly the odd man out once DP came back, you kind of sent a message to other goalies around the league and might’ve taken a nice depth move out of the equation for this year. And with DP you need a backup plan and perhaps one better than a 40 year old, albeit a pretty good 40 year old.

They could’ve gotten a bag of pucks for Biron for all I care, I think if someone wanted him, you owed it to him to send him there.

by Pauly C on Aug 1, 2010 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure Biron got interest

Or he would have been good as gone. If they are betting on lawson this much next year, I’m sure they would have been fine with him last year in part time duty at the end of the season. Biron wasn’t hurt by this at all, now he’s got a solid backup spot behind ludquivst so I think his situation turned out fine. And if he honestly was ready for a playoff run on a team last year, he would have put up better numbers. I’m sure any team would stick with their starting goal as is seeing biron’s numbers and that he’s on the market.

The nino thing was just a possible inference. Say biron plays better then he does and we get something in a trade for him that is substantial, then we don’t get nino anymore because we move down a few spots in the draft. And I’d take a nino in a yr or 2 over a playoff appearance or playoff contension(sp?) spot any day.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Aug 1, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

He kind of rotted on the ice when he played.

by TMS on Aug 2, 2010 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cap Move as promised

For those wondering when Snow was going to take advantage of others’ budget/cap problems as promised, this move qualifies. The Ducks unloaded him because he didn’t fit their budget. Better yet, unlike the Hawks cap-dump moves, the Isles didn’t have to give up much.

Well played, Garth.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Jul 31, 2010 12:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Smart

One thing garth is a really smart gm. He can put together a team really well. Drafting, trading, and signings. I can’t wait till the day we make the playoffs and then wang lets garth spend some nice money. I think then, you will see garth at his best bringing in some solid players to help our team make good cup runs.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Do you think there is more to come? I hope Garth looks a little into RW if he doesn’t plan on bringing Petrov on board.

I saw a roller rink in Hawaii next to the beach...I have to move there now.

by metalcoconut on Jul 31, 2010 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ha, I wish I could even have a 50/50 guess. On the one hand Snow talked of playoffs and bid hard for Martin and Volchenkov. On the other hand, having struck out there he’s being patient and his acquisition yesterday is arguably better than the two D he plucked off the free agent 2nd-day bin.

The only thing I’m sure of is he’s not doing knee-jerk things, he has a little money, er, cap floor room to spend if he wants. I’d love to know whether he counts on either of the young wings making the team. I’d love to know what his internal deadline is for not factoring Petrov in.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 1, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Count me in that category

Although as of now this kinda falls in the “meh” category. Not exactly the kind of player that would fall into our lap as expected.

It does open more options on D. We have a good mix of puck movers and size. It’s a start.

by Chickendirt on Jul 31, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

To me he fits better than a Ladd or {vomits} Burish/Eager would, and maybe on par with Versteeg (some good upside and some big questions for he and Wis’) and different from Reasoner. To think of the other salary dumps off the top of my head.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 1, 2010 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anyone know

If Hillen and Amac have to go through waivers if they don’t make the team? I thought both guys showed potential

by lostsin44 on Jul 31, 2010 1:03 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

They will make the team so no real concern their

But if they don’t they can be sent to Bridgeport before the season and than be called up. To send them back down would require them to go through waivers in which they will be taken up right away

by rockhouse15 on Jul 31, 2010 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

do you think

That Bruno starts at the ahl level? Who is on the outs?

by lostsin44 on Jul 31, 2010 1:58 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Bruno

It’s either ahl or waivers from every angle I look at it. Although he definitely has a possibility to see time with injuries. Who knows what he or the team wants to do with him once he doesn’t make it out of camp.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hillen would require waivers; A-Mac not yet

I really don’t think there is any risk of Hillen not making the top 6 out of camp though. I’d be surprised if A-Mac doesn’t, too.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 1, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Loose Cannon.

If you watch some of the clips of the guy, you can see that he has a crazy mentality. That could be good or bad depending on certain conditions with his adaptation to the team/system. He could be just what the team needs to help them stick up for one another. If you think about who the Isles had to back them up last year the pickings were slim for most games. Unless Snow decided that the Flyers needed some extra grit for that game you really didn’t have much trouble picking on a small 2nd or 3rd line. With another physical d man in there that teams know will not have any difficulty throwing down with them you add a little hesitation/pause to their game. Which in turn could be what a young and possibly dangerous group of offensively gifted group needs to buy some time. There were so many plays that looked like they could have been good last year that the dissipated in their last seconds because the other team got the step on the play due to their lack of fear of being leveled or crunched.

So you add some size, puck moving ability and physicality to that bunch and not only have you given the offense that additional step that they may have needed all last season but you give the other team something to think about when they enter your zone. Now just add F*#$ing nuts to that and the teams are having to look over their shoulder to make sure that he is not coming for their heads. Hopefully he has learned about the new head shot rule and perhaps he will focus on cleaner hits in the future but at least we have someone to stare Pronger and Celine Dion Pheneuf in the face come game time versus Philly and Toronto.

I saw a roller rink in Hawaii next to the beach...I have to move there now.

by metalcoconut on Jul 31, 2010 1:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes

A lot of forearm “checks” that look like elbows in the follow through. It looks like a lot of his fights are after hits like that, but I saw him go after Perry (when he was a Blackhawks) after Bertuzzi ran their goalie, and he had a great scrap with Tootoo that I think he gets the win. (Didn’t appear to lose too many either, but a lit of times he gets taken down or a guy lands on top…homer announcers making it sound like he lost) His fights are pretty passionate, and I think the fans will love him when he starts sticking up for his teammates.

by Keith Quinn on Jul 31, 2010 1:59 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I got that vibe too

but he only had 56 PIM in 69 games last season so, in general, he keeps it pretty clean. And if he takes a penalty going after someone who drilled Tavares I’m all for it.

by Anarcurt on Jul 31, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

And don't forget.

20 of those 56 penalty minutes were from fighting majors. So he is definitely a low-risk penalty wise d-man.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good observation. I didn’t look at his PIM. perhaps he is crazy like a fox. That would be fantastic. At the very least, if he can be a solid 2nd pairing guy (if not 1st) then it looks like we stole him. Either way, this already looks like another win for Garth. I think I can hear Gordon breathing a sigh of relief all the way in Texas.

I saw a roller rink in Hawaii next to the beach...I have to move there now.

by metalcoconut on Aug 1, 2010 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

Everything I read and see, as stated somewhere, points to wiz as a solid top 4 guy with top 2 potential. He is a good all around player that protects his players and plays with heart. Offensively, physically, shotblocking, and pretty much anything you can think of a d-man must do, he does it well. Not superstar level yet, but without question at a top 4 level. I want to see how he pans out this year. Very solid pickup by garth, and needed.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Aug 1, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Crazy Mentality

That’s what makes me nervous. Don’t get me wrong, I’d love for someone to bring a bit of the crazy who can also actually play the game for more than 4 minutes of own-zone play a night — I just have very little patience for dumb decision-making. So I hope it’s just a bad rep, or a work in progress, and not Jack Johnson’s Disease.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 1, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Judging by the PIM's vs Highlight reels I think we are safe.

As a snap judgment I would say that this guy looks to be a Sutton presence with more fire in him. Plus he doesn’t exactly wait for the opportune boarding moment, he’ll make the open ice hit as demonstrated against Doan and a couple of other elites.

I saw a roller rink in Hawaii next to the beach...I have to move there now.

by metalcoconut on Aug 1, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think this a good signing. Too be honest I don’t know much about him, beyond his stats. I’ve seen him play a bunch but never really payed a whole lot of attention. He brings a little offense to the table. Can move the puck. According to metalcoconut and quin8722 he is a little dirty which I don’t think would be the worst thing for us.

by MatthewM11 on Jul 31, 2010 2:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Don't know

that he IS dirty, but the couple of hits LOOK dirty which set off some fights etc. I welcome the abrasiveness though, clean or dirty, I think it’s good for the team, and they may HAVE To stand up for each other.

by Keith Quinn on Jul 31, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

GREAT MOVE

BehindtheNet lists him at +11.7 Corsi Relative (In other words, his team’s shot differential was more positive by 11.7 on average with him on the Ice) and he is the rare D man who draws more penalties than he takes.

MUCH better than the other two D men we acquired.

by garik16 on Jul 31, 2010 4:03 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd agree with that whole heartedly

Eaton was a 4/5 defenseman on the penguins last year and jurcina was pretty much a career 7th man. Wiz seems to be a solid top 4 guy, all around. Definitely a great and needed pickup. Imagine how much worse we would have looked without him right now. Makes this signing even more sweeter.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fantastic trade, and like Dominic hinted at, good on Garth to capitalize on the fact that the Ducks were in a bit of a corner and had to make a cap-clearing trade. (The 1 yr. deal seemed a bit pricey for them, and there are rumblings that another move [Kaberle?] could be on the way.) I don’t think you could find a better fit on the market [in terms of style and value] for the Islanders than Wisniewski. Why?

- RH shot. Very valuable, especially one who can play in all situations like Wiz can.
- He can log lots of minutes. In the seventeen games he played w/ANA in ‘08/09, he played around 21 mins. a night. (Keep in mind, he was behind Pronger/Niedermayer). This past season, he logged 24:20. (I’m guessing some of that was with Niedermayer?) He had his role expanded with the Ducks, and from what I’ve read, he was very good two seasons ago but a bit up-and-down in ‘09/10. A legit top-four d-man, though.
- He plays both PP/PK. Of his 24:20 last season, 2:32 was on the PP and 3:28 was on the PK. Looking at his numbers from past seasons, his PP/PK splits are pretty even – main point being that he’s [at the very least] a proven second-unit option in both situations. (And, as a RH shot, perhaps he gets a look alongside Streit on the #1 PP?)
- He hits and blocks shots. I know a lot were interested in bringing back Sutton for these two reasons, but Wisniewski is no slouch in these areas. In 69 GP last season, he had 129 hits (led all Ducks d-men) and 102 blocked shots (led all Ducks d-men). He’s always been a player who gets his nose dirty, despite his size – and looking at what we lost with Sutton/Meyer, we re-hee-heeeeealllllly need a guy like that.
- He’s physical, and stands up for his teammates. It’s been discussed quite a bit already in this thread, but, yeah – he plays with a chip on his shoulder. (Dirty? Sometimes, from what I’ve seen. I think he can control himself fairly well, though.) He retaliated for Perry by drilling Seabrook after the latter creamed the former [with a high hit] earlier in the play… yeah, that got him [Wiz] a lengthy suspension, but I think everyone can agree that we need that kind of attitude on the team when it comes to our players sticking up for one another. Also, he’ll drop the gloves every so often – four fights in ‘09/10, nine fights in ’07-08.
- He’s a great personality and a good locker room presence. Mostly going off what I’ve read and heard from others, but I think he could definitely be a fan favorite – maybe even a leader on the team [despite the one-year contract]. (Thought this was pretty funny: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDP427X5fXQ)

by pickups on Jul 31, 2010 4:28 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

Awesome points

On paper he does look close to the total package. But, he honestly needs a little refining in some areas to be a top 2, but even without that he’s a solid top 4 without question. Definitely has the potential to be one, so that’s more then enough for me to have a mile wide grin now. I pray we sign him longterm before the season ends. Kid has a lot of potential and seems to have a lot of heart and agression to WANT/ALWAYS play an uptempo style. I’ve seen him play and he looks like the real deal for what we need in all areas.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Jul 31, 2010 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good points

Hadn’t thought about it in that way, but Wiz > Sutton in my book. And factoring in age, betting on Wiz next year > Sutton next year.

I liked this deal as a trade in its own right (nice value transact), but many of you guys are swaying me on the prospects for Wiz as a player in his own right.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 1, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

****

Just getting to this today… this is the best case for Wizzer that I’ve heard so far. I’ve never been against the signing, but this really sums up the positives. I completely forgot how shallow the Isles are at RH D(Bruno, Jurcina, Marty, Reese(?))
Consider that Reese is maybe(has he signed anywhere yet?)
Bruno is trade fodder right now. You have to wonder if now that they have JW and Jurcina to play across from Streit they are heavily shopping Bruno… but that’s like trying to sell generic cigarettes at Phillip Morris.
Marty… damn, I really like Marty… but we all know that Marty will be on crutches by Christmas… (got I hope I’m wrong… for Marty’s sake)
This is probably why Jurcina was signed,
“Scott, we need a RH defenseman, can you think of anybody”
“Jurcina played well for me at Providence”
“really”
“If nothing else he can reach the top shelf in the utility closet without a step stool”
“wow… that’s good thinking, we lost the little ladder last year and you know how Mr. Wang is about that kind of stuff.. and I didn’t see you going into your pocket for a new one.”

The NY Islanders are about to redo the salary cap floor with russian marble!

by JPinVA on Aug 3, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

LMAO

This is probably why Jurcina was signed,
"Scott, we need a RH defenseman, can you think of anybody"
"Jurcina played well for me at Providence"
"really"
"If nothing else he can reach the top shelf in the utility closet without a step stool"
"wow… that’s good thinking, we lost the little ladder last year and you know how Mr. Wang is about that kind of stuff.. and I didn’t see you going into your pocket for a new one."

Funny as hell.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Aug 3, 2010 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL
Gordon: “Jurcina played well for me at Providence”
Snow: “really”

For some reason this part of the exchange really got me.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 3, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

translation...

“Really” = “I am about $10M under the cap floor, have three roster spots for top four defensemen, we’re trying to get bigger and tougher and you give me Milan Jurcina…. REALLY!?!”

The NY Islanders are about to redo the salary cap floor with russian marble!

by JPinVA on Aug 4, 2010 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Very happy with this – the commitment is short at the high amount, but the Isles hold RFA years and it cost very little.

I mean look at how much defenders were going for at the trade deadline – Leopold/Greshbeshov/Sutton for 2nd’s, Alberts for a 3rd, Staios for a 3rd and a 7th defenseman salary dump. Considering the best guys there are all rentals and Wisniewski is better or has more potential than the rest, I think this is really good asset management by Snow.

I’m glad the Isles could take advantage of someone’s cap issues.

by HugoAgogo on Jul 31, 2010 5:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Anaheim 'Cap' Issues

By the way, I’m going to be a pedant again (jerk!) but only for the sake of clarifying in case someone looks at the Ducks’ cap figure and says, “Wait a minute…”

At $44 million as of today the Ducks have some significant cap room, but they are clearly a team operating on a specific cash budget that probably didn’t have room for Wis in the role they had for him. If you look back, two of their acquisition/salary dumps last year were trading bigger cap commitments for smaller cash obligations. Blake and Visnovsky both have less money due to them than their cap hits, and they were acquired for guys who have the reverse: Lower cap hits than the actual annual money still due. Essentially the Oilers and Leafs bought some of the Ducks’ cap space in those moves. The singular EarlSleek had a nice breakdown of this at BoC.

For obvious reasons, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Islanders make moves like that if the opportunity arose.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 1, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks Dom. That is actually what I was referring to (I had just read the BoC article on that point) – but I can see it wasn’t super-clear.

by HugoAgogo on Aug 1, 2010 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe this guy

can shame Jurcina into throwing his body around a little more.

by ilopan on Aug 1, 2010 9:09 AM EDT reply actions  

More from Anaheim Calling

Anaheim Calling has another post on Wisniewski, which should help give an idea of what he can be as well as why some Ducks fans aren’t bothered to see him go.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 1, 2010 3:13 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Life is full of contradictions, and I am too.

I think Wiz has played dirty for other teams, and I hope he does not play that way for the Isles. On the other hand, I am glad that the Isles will have someone to help protect Tav from being targeted.

/Note unceasing sarcastic laughter in background.
Fan of the 2010 Stanley Cup Champion Blackhawks!
Fan of the not 2010 Stanley Cup Champion Isles!

by burpchelischili on Aug 1, 2010 6:30 PM EDT reply actions  

heh, Nice Sig!

Wheel of Location, Turn Turn Turn. Tell us the location that we will play.
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Aug 2, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ha, I missed that sig before. Chili I hope you can still stand to watch the Isles after being spoiled by the Hawks. ;)

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 2, 2010 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

I am hoping

to see an actual playoff run from the Isles this year. I was only able to “watch” the great Islander teams in the past in the newspaper. I did go see a couple of games in 82-83 season, but it was at the rangers home, ick.
God bless the internet, and NHL on TV!
The Hawks winning did good things for my hockey attitude, but I am still looking for that personal nightmare of a Hawks/Isles SCF.

/Note unceasing sarcastic laughter in background.
Fan of the 2010 Stanley Cup Champion Blackhawks!
Fan of the not 2010 Stanley Cup Champion Isles!

by burpchelischili on Aug 2, 2010 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like it! I feel like we have a solid top four defensemen (Streit/Eaton/Jurcina/Wisniewski). Don’t know if the last three are just stopgaps for the kids to mature, but I was thinking that maybe we could add Hamonic and deHaan in there so they could get some on the job experience. Not saying the D is worldbeaters, but it’s the most excited I’ve been about the ‘D’ in a while and it’s a lot more solid than what we had previously! Wish it was October!

by IslipTom91 on Aug 2, 2010 11:16 AM EDT reply actions  

I don’t know why people are giving jurcina more credit then he deserves. Can he win a spot over a hillen? Maybe, but I don’t think so. He’ll be our #7 to start the season I believe when all is said and done. He has size, but not much more. Most of his career he was a #7 d-man, so I don’t know why that should change now. Who knows though, he may surprise some people at camp and earn a top 6 spot, but that’s highly unlikely unless he’s playing with a new fire under gordon.

About our youngings:
Hamonic-Definitely ready for some nhl time. I’m drooling over his first nhl appearance (most likely this year) from all the things I have been hearing about him

De Haan-Had a rough injury, probably spends another year in juniors. He’s still not as big as the isles want him to be I hear, but still has all the offensive and skating skills of a top tier d-man. 1 more year and he should be nhl ready.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Aug 2, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jurcina

is in no way shape or form a top 4 d-man, even on a team like the islanders

by jcam1 on Aug 2, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thrillen for a Hillen

Put Hillen next to a sizable guy and keep his jaw from shattering via Ovi slapshot and he’s in that top four. They have some options here. Between Streit, Wiz, Hillen, Eaton and A-Mac they have five guys they shouldn’t need to “hide” in any scenario (I’m using a fair bit of hope with Eaton.) I’d be tempted to keep A-Mac with Streit a lot of the time; they complement well and A-Mac doesn’t try nor need to do too much.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 2, 2010 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd predict Streit - Wiz/Martinek

Honestly not sure anymore, if I posted these numbers somewhere earlier… And they’re not exactly very meaningful anyway, but might be some food for thought.
Overall, there’s no doubt MacDonald did well and he actually was successful with Streit indeed (+7, but 103.04 % PDO). But their Corsi WOWY numbers don’t look too convincing.
 
MacDonald with Streit: 742 Total Corsi events, 0.468 Corsi ratio
MacDonald without Streit: 630, 0.487
Streit without MacDonald: 2185, 0.490
MacDonald with Sutton: 319, 0.508
MacDonald without Sutton: 1053, 0.467
Sutton without MacDonald: 1517, 0.447
 
The shifts of MacDonald with either Streit or Sutton were very similar overall, I’d say. Sutton drew as tough assignments as Streit at least and surely didn’t have a more favourable zone start than Streit. If anything, we’d expect the Corsi ratio to be slightly higher for MacDonald when paired with Streit. But it obviously was the other way around. I’m not saying MacDonald/Streit won’t work, but I could definitely see other possibilities there.

Well, the D pairings are difficult to predict anyway. But there’s another reason why I think Streit might not be paired with MacDonald at the beginning. We should keep in mind that two of the new guys (Wiz and Jurcina) shoot right – as well as Martinek, who’s obviously some kind of an addition, too. Just like last season, when Streit started off with Gervais and then got some time with Martinek, I expect them to pair him with someone who shoots right. As Jurcina might not be good enough for that role, it will be decided between Martinek and Wiz, it seems. And Wiz could be the favourite there, as Martinek might be placed on the 2nd strong pairing, which, just like Sutton-Hillen last season for example, might be used in a more defensive/shutdown role getting lots of defensive zone draws and heavy assignments.

Where I totally agree with you is on Jack Hillen, however. I’m very surprised some people have him down to #6 and fighting with Jurcina for the final spot. He was their best defender on many nights In the first half of the season. So, I could certainly see him getting that spot at Martinek’s side, if Gordon will chose to go with Streit/Wiz on the one hand and Martinek for the toughs on the other hand.
That would leave MacDonald, Eaton and Jurcina for the two final spots with perhaps Jurcina’s advantage of being the only guy who shoots right (though let’s not forget Bruno who shoots right, too). But well, as you said elsewhere, health will play a big role and might already on opening night determine the D pairings indeed.

by BenHasna on Aug 2, 2010 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m admittedly not factoring in Martinek because I don’t know what to expect. I mean, I expect him to be back and taking a crack, it’s just hard to know how ready he’ll be after rehab — and when.

Interesting stuff on MacDonald’s numbers. I don’t know how to measure him based on half a season with an evolving role, but observationally I really liked how he played with Streit. I saw smart decisions, sound D play, and a steadiness that allowed Streit to be more “Streit-like” and less babysitter.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 3, 2010 1:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, MacDonald certainly is hard to measure. I also liked what I saw on most nights and overall he definitely looks promising indeed. But in some games, he struggled a bit with his positioning in the own zone, I thought. He always does that swing with his stick to show his D partner where to go and often got lost himself a bit. I didn’t like that and sometimes thought there can’t be real chemistry if you need to do that every 2nd time they enter your zone. But then again, that’s no big deal and pretty usual for a rookie who’s got to play rather heavy minutes from the beginning.

Anyway, his numbers could be inflated a bit. He for example was +9 with Roloson who posted a 95.14% save percentage when MacDonald was on. And at 9.14%, they even shot slighlty above average at the same time. That’s not repeatable, but at the same time, he’s of course likely to improve. And looking at this contract (signed through 13-14), he’s obviously got time to do that and might indeed not be starting with the Isles.

by BenHasna on Aug 3, 2010 5:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, the isles like that a-mac/streit combo a lot before a-mac got hurt. I’d say that’s a line. Then you can mix whatever you think will work. I’d say match hillen or wiz with eaton or martinek and then we’re good:

Streit-A-mac
Eaton/Martinek-Wiz/Hillen
Eaton/Martinek-Wiz/Hillen

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Aug 2, 2010 5:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Eaton has been touted as a reliable, positionally-sound d-man. I think he might be a great partner for Wisniewski, who’s more offensive-minded. (And not as reliable in his own end.)

Streit – MacDonald
Eaton – Wiz
Hillen – Martinek

And have Jurcina on hand to slot alongside Hillen once Martinek takes his usual mid-season vacation to the IR. I think those two [Hillen/Jurcina] would complement one another pretty well, actually.

by pickups on Aug 2, 2010 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think A-Mac may be in Bridgeport and get called up

Not because he isnt good enough to make the team, but because he doesnt have to pass through waivers to get called up.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Aug 2, 2010 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Starting to look that way with all the NHL contracts they have

I’m gonna plug my ears and hope otherwise, though. If I had my way I’d give Reese another long look, too.

Lighthouse Hockey: More defensemen than we know how to spell.

by Dominik on Aug 3, 2010 1:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

They will both see time with the Isles

But IMO its gonna be once someone is hurt.

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Aug 3, 2010 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think we’ll see another trade or two that consolidates bodies and returns a top 6 forward. At least one defenseman currently penciled in for the big club won’t be here, in my opinion.

by Hakker on Aug 3, 2010 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

We can only dream

About that type of d-man depth. lol. It would truly be a much needed thing though. Garth said he wanted to fix the D, and although it is looking better then last year, it’s not top 10 yet, might not even be considered top 15 by some. But I am all for giving say willie mitchell a cheap 1yr option if garth wants depth or even a sign and trade of some RFA or a guy that a team doesn’t have contract room for. Souray is an option too, but he’s had way too much injury trouble in his career + his age for me to not want to go that route. Kaberle in toronto wouldn’t be bad either, but to get him we probably need to package somebody noteworthy with a pick, probably 2 guys and a 2nd rounder, but he’d be worth it if we want playoff time now and our youngings to now see all that they can be sooner then later.

Tim Gleason would help a us in a ton of ways and he’s only 27. Gleason would be my ideal pick here. Tough, fights, throws big checks, great 2-way player, has some decent size, good offensive skills, locked for 2 years, solid top 4, possible top 2. He brings a lot to the table, and has tons of leadership qualities I here. I’d throw a nice package together if we could get him. I’d give a 2nd + 3rd rounder, joensuu and gervais/jurcina for him. Guy brings a lot to the table and would help us SO MUCH. Garth if you hear me, bring in GLEASON! lol

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Aug 3, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe

That package would work with just a 2nd rounder and the 2 guys, but if not I’d add the 3rd rnder too.

Go isles or Go home.

by OzzyFan on Aug 3, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip and shoulder surgery not required.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
No toughness
Kevinwriterpic_small
2012 NHL Draft Prospect Profile: Matt Dumba
Small
Reeser Out 2-3 Weeks, Who's next?
One_smith03_small
Nielsen and Tavares Happily Drink the Kool-Aid! So What's Our Problem with UFA's?
Small
Would Milbury have drafted Tavares?
Kevinwriterpic_small
2012 NHL Draft Prospect Profile: Nail Yakupov
Capt
10 Game Chunk #5: Playing Like a Playoff-Bound Team Would
Icon3_small
January 2012 Power Rankings: A Playoff-Level Month?
Small
WHY IS EATON PLAYING WHILE REESE SITS?
Gigantor15_small
JP's January Plus/Minus Poll

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Garth Snow screwed this one up because he should have:

  219 votes | Results

Isles Reading

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New York Rangers 52 34 13 5 73
Philadelphia 54 31 16 7 69
New Jersey 54 31 19 4 66
Pittsburgh 54 30 19 5 65
New York Islanders 53 22 23 8 52

(updated 2.11.2012 at 8:02 AM EST)

New York Islanders Roster

# Pos. DOB W H
Josh Bailey 12 LW 10/2/1989 190 6-1
Rick DiPietro 39 G 9/19/1981 190 6-1
Mark Eaton 4 D 5/6/1977 215 6-1
Michael Grabner 40 RW 10/5/1987 185 6-0
Travis Hamonic 3 D 8/16/1990 203 6-2
Milan Jurcina 27 D 6/7/1983 253 6-4
Andrew MacDonald 47 D 9/7/1986 196 6-1
Matt Martin 17 LW 3/8/1989 210 6-3
Al Montoya 35 G 2/13/1985 203 6-2
Mike Mottau 10 D 3/19/1978 190 6-0
Matt Moulson 26 LW 11/1/1983 205 6-1
Evgeni Nabokov 20 G 7/25/1975 200 6-0
Aaron Ness 55 D 5/18/1990 170 5-10
Nino Niederreiter 25 RW 9/8/1992 205 6-2
Frans Nielsen 51 C 4/24/1984 184 6-0
Kyle Okposo 21 RW 4/16/1988 205 6-0
Jay Pandolfo 29 LW 12/27/1974 190 6-1
P.A. Parenteau 15 LW 3/24/1983 193 6-0
Rhett Rakhshani 49 RW 3/6/1988 190 5-10
Marty Reasoner 16 C 2/26/1977 205 6-1
Dylan Reese 42 D 8/29/1984 201 6-1
Brian Rolston 11 LW 2/21/1973 215 6-2
Steve Staios 24 D 7/28/1973 200 6-1
Mark Streit 2 D 12/11/1977 197 6-0
John Tavares 91 C 9/20/1990 202 6-0
Tim Wallace 36 RW 8/6/1984 207 6-1
Calvin de Haan 44 D 5/9/1991 187 6-1

Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Warlord2_small Mark D

Lighthouse_hockey_logo_2_medium_small Keith Quinn

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Hg_small Chris McNally

Master of FIGs and Power Tablature

Icon3_small ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein

71096_479208120482_1257968_n_small David Hanssen