Bridgeport done; NHL playoffs just getting good
In the end the giants from Hershey had little trouble downing Bridgeport in five games, with an absurdly convincing 4-1 Game 5 win last night. The Sound Tigers still haven't won a playoff series since 2003 (which, of course is 10 years more recent than their parent club's last happy post-series handshake).
A nice summation of the series from Michael Fornabaio:
Bridgeport probably should have won Game 1, could have won Game 2, and the Sound Tigers head home with a chance to shock the league anyway, but they blow up in the second period of Game 3, then come back against a non-desperate team to win Game 4, and then… What was this?
Still, a few nice signs from the quite undermanned baby Islanders this year -- not the least of which was providing the gift of Andrew MacDonald to the big club, while sending a seemingly endless stream of blueline injury fill-ins. Last night, next season's featured goalie Mikko Koskinen gave up four, but ... um ... his team was outshot 34-7. That is not a typo.
Elsewhere, future Sound Tiger Travis Hamonic's team is also against the wall, with Brandon having dropped Game 4 at home to Calgary to fall behind 3-1 in the WHL series.
NHL Playoffs: We Know Drama
And in the big leagues, the NHL playoffs continued to deliver: Castoff and late-season signing Miroslav Satan is the hero, scoring the double-OT winner in Boston -- on a powerplay, for too many men (paging Don Cherry!) -- as the Sabres continue to be snakebit. Ryan Miller made multiple unbelievable saves yet took the tough 3-2 loss. In Los Angeles, Roberto Luongo won but hardly was dominant, while Henrik Sedin -- previously held in choke check by Michal Handzus -- supplied the breakthrough goal. In Montreal, Washington maintained control of the series but young Carey Price made a bit of an ass of himself.
This is why I love playoff hockey (not for the Price bit): Everything is condensed. The intensity is compressed. The see-saw narrative changes nightly: One night there are goats and chokers in Chicago and San Jose, the next night heroes destined for success. The bandwagon is full one night, the next the ravine is full of those who jumped off the bridge.
A couple of us were bantering back and forth about what ails the Sharks -- not for this series necessarily (they've mostly been dominant) but for their playoff fortunes overall. A sense that something has been missing, but what is it? And is it the same reason every year, or are there different causes, with different variables?
[Update: Check out this interesting post at Battle of California going into Marleau's historic playoff performance.] For three seasons from 2002-2006 Patrick Marleau was essentially a point-per-game player in the playoffs. For the last four he's been about a half-point per game. The difference in such brief samples is slim -- if it's three weeks in January, it's nothing -- and yet the playoffs make it gargantuan. Certainly more so for your captain (which is why he holds that title no more).
And the playoffs' intensity and small samples fuel these debates. Martin Brodeur is Cup-winning playoff legend, yet he's known his share of big-time failures throughout his career -- including the seasons immediately before and immediately after his first Cup. Luongo still carries a playoff question mark -- yet is it based on reality, or on limited opportunity? Meanwhile on the other end of the Luongo narrative spectrum, he is credited with "finally winning the big one" with that gold medal this year in Vancouver, yet in the meaningful Olympic games he was ordinary (heh, as was Brodeur), and in crunch time he coughed up the fat rebound that allowed Zach Parise to send the gold medal game to OT.
Of course, if Buffalo scores first last night, then Miro is the guy who couldn't convert his golden single-OT chance past Miller. And Henrik Sedin -- is he the guy who put up a point a game last postseason, or the guy who was minus-8 with 4 points in 12 games the postseason before?
You may have guessed: I'm suspicious of the legend of the playoff performer. I believe it exists, and I know there are rare breeds who consistently performed on the big stage, but I don't trust our ability to identify them reliably, particularly when one hat trick and one four-point night can change everything. There are John Druce's buried in the weeds, and there are Dino Ciccarelli's staring at us with 608 regular season goals, 73 playoff goals, but no Cup to secure automatic entrance into the club.
... And that's just one reason I love the playoffs. Because every night there is fuel for these kinds of unresolvable debates. Every game rewrites the story. Every series turns heroes into scapegoats (Hi Dan Boyle) and back again.
Yeah, when the Islanders make it back, I'm gonna be a mess.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I can’t remember if someone brought it up here or at Broad Street, but since Scott Stevens retired the Devils haven’t been the same. Sure they are putting up the huge numbers in the regular season, but they have gone 2-4 in playoff series so far. Their two wins in the Quarterfinals were followed by them being wrecked in 4-1 Routs in the Semis. I couldn’t believe how much people discredited the Flyers going into the series, considering how one sided the season series was.
But last night I was thinking of what might be wrong with Luongo, and I think he’s putting too much pressure on himself. I mentioned last year one of my dislikes of Danis was that you could tell in his body language after he gave up a goal he was about to give up 2-3 more in a row. Luongo to me feels like he has that same body language. Now I’m not going to say something crazy like the reason for it is the captaincy. Even with what the Sedin’s managed this year, in the end the Canucks are still considered Luongo’s team. Even if a defenseman makes a huge mistake in his own end leading to a goal, the goal is always blamed on Luongo. He seems to be carrying the weight of the whole team unlike any Goalie I’ve seen. I know he signed the huge contract and he should be the man in Vancouver, but I don’t think historically there’s a goalie with as much pressure on him as Luongo for the past 2-3 seasons.
Enough of my defending Luongo, I get enough crap for it anyway. I managed to catch the 3rd period last night and it was wild. It was one of those games you just knew a team wasn’t going to fade quietly into the night.
Mauldin Played for Columbus a few years ago, He has six career games.
Luongo seems to look behind him after each hard shot…the same way that Danis did as well. I noticed that in the last game. He just seems uncertain of himself and I got the feeling it was because he was uncertain of where his d was going to be positioned. I notice that he was looking around when someone relitively close had the puck and and was about to take a shot.
Please let Roloson and Biron be the guest announcers on some Chicago playoff broadcasts...please hockey Gods!
by metalcoconut on Apr 22, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions
I think the loss of Stevens was massive — particularly considering his playoff intimidation factor — but I also think these impressions can change in a blink: I always remember the years after the Devils won their first Cup: They missed the playoffs, then won the division three years in a row without even making a Conference final. They were a “fluke Cup winner,” playoff chokers, everything in between, until …. they won again in 2000 (without winning the division) and we’re back to Marty is Legend.
I just think a little too much is made out of a tournament that each year has 16 entrants, 8 first-round flops, 4 “still can’t get to a semifinal” clubs, and just 1 team everyone remembers. (Granted, I happily make too much of it myself.)
On that note, I’m honestly undecided on Luongo. I mean, he’s indisputably a fantastic goalie (heh, so I welcome your defenses). Is there something to the playoff rap? For the reason in the preceding paragraph, I’m guarded on that one. I’ve just watched too many great players carry that label around for years until suddenly they get their name on the Cup and half the hockey world does an about-face about how good they were.
As for what’s eating him now (if anything), that “captain/pressure” meme is probably just one of those things that comes up as soon as a team loses two playoff games in a series (OMG! WHAT’S WRONG? A PLAYOFF TEAM IS LOSING TO ANOTHER PLAYOFF TEAM!!). But I do think giving the captaincy to your goalie was a stupid idea from Day 1. Bad Idea Jeans.
Lighthouse Hockey: Playing the NHL Lotto
I couldn’t believe how much people discredited the Flyers going into the series, considering how one sided the season series was.
For me, that was about them playing like crap down the stretch and Boucher not looking so hot. Weren’t you at one point thinking they were going to miss the playoffs entirely? It was that form that had me wondering if they were going to flame out, no matter who they faced. But that lineup should always be dangerous.
Lighthouse Hockey: Playing the NHL Lotto
I agree
I posted something on Blue shirt banter about this. Stevens really seems like the glue that keptthe Devils winning not broduer
by Rickfansince76 on Apr 22, 2010 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Tenders in playoffs
Since goaltender is the most important position, it all comes down to them. That’s why they’re so easy to grade in any situation. I think it’s unfair to Brodeur and Luongo to say they are or aren’t playoff performers. The play of the team in front of them matters as well.
Can you blame last year’s game 7 debacle on Marty? I don’t think so. If Carolina isn’t given those chances, they can’t score those goals. They may have been soft (I honestly don’t remember), but they got the opportunity because the whole team was back on their heels. Can’t see it being solely Brodeur’s fault. However, goalie is the high profile position, so success goes in their favor, and they’re gods, or failure goes on them, and they’re chokers.
by billymac23 on Apr 22, 2010 1:00 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
But...
If you go through the Goalie Matchups the last few years in the Finals, you aren’t talking about Elite goalies.
Fleury Vs Osgood
Fleury Vs Osgood
Giugere Vs Emery
Ward Vs Rollie (and the other Oiler goalies)
And that’s since Lockout
Fleury is good but not Elite, Osgood is Osgood, Giugere is erratic but when he’s hot he’s hot, Emery well we know that mess, Ward might be elite but he’s still young, And we know what can happen when Rollie gets hot.
But I think what that really shows is that an average goalie behind a good team tends to beat a great goalie with an average team.
Then there’s the goalies who get insanely hot and carry a team in the playoffs, but that’s not something you can expect season to season.
Mauldin Played for Columbus a few years ago, He has six career games.
Would Billy Smith have the record he did without Denis and Kenny in front of him?
Of course not. Does that mean that Billy doesn’t deserve his Conn Smythe or his spot in the HHOF? Of course not. Marty was a great goalie. His skills have no doubt diminished and he can no longer carry the team on his back the way he used to. And yes, Stevens would make any goalie look better. And I would add that losing Oduya probably hurt more than Kovi helped.
steven’s presence clearing space in front of marty as well as opponents dumping it in more vs facing him stepping up on them at the blue line both helped marty immensely
oduya probably helps, but then again, he wasn’t playing good for them this year, i dont know what it was but it wasn’t clicking.. after the trade he put up a big difference point wise so maybe there was something going on in the room – he most def would have helped their PK vs philly though
NY Islanders Hockey: Where MRI's are addictive
Yeah, that is curious with Oduja
It sounded like losing last year’s Oduja hurt them, but that version of Oduja wasn’t there this year for some reason (at least according to Devils watchers). Wonder what’s up there. (Wonder if anything is up there.)
Lighthouse Hockey: Playing the NHL Lotto

by 






























