Playoff Preview: Pittsburgh vs. Ottawa. Pick 'em.
I'm going to do what instinctively sounds like a bad idea, because it creates more work for myself, which means I should stop right now. However, I can only attach one poll per post -- so I can't poll all eight series at once; thus, here begins a string of eight playoff series previews over the next few days.
It should stir up some talk (or at least votes) and hopefully get you engaged in the NHL playoffs. Why? Because the playoffs are awesome with or without the Islanders. (Even better than April baseball, so you just put that remote down right now, mister.) I promise these posts won't interfere with the lottery and season recap threads.
Some relevant Isles and series-specific links after the jump (which is after the poll if you're on the main page). But the easy thing is to just vote. Vote with your heart, or vote with your head -- I don't care. I just like pretty bar charts.
League News: Carnage in Tampa
You probably heard that new Lightning owner Jeff Vinik threw out the garbage cleaned house with extreme prejudice. It's early, but I dare say they might have a competent owner now. Via Raw Charge, here is speculation on the candidates to replace GM Brian Lawton, and here is a strong hint that the job is ex-Wild and ex-Flames GM Doug Risebrough's if he wants it.
Best of all? Here is an awesome Toronto radio interview with Lawton, in which he praises his own work, the players he brought in, kills former coach Rick Tocchet with faint praise ("Rick's ... a good guy."), and naturally chalks the move up to a new owner just wanting a fresh start.
AHL: Bridgeport Playoffs
Bridgeport's playoffs start Wednesday in Hershey. Schedule is here. They could be over by Sunday -- not unthinkable given the Bears' chocolatey strength -- as games 3 and 4 are at home Saturday and Sunday. Dustin Kohn, on the Clear Day List, still sounds questionable.
World Championships Goes Go-Go
Confirmed: Scott Gordon will coach Team USA, with Wild coach Todd Richards as one of his assistants. Gordon brings along his video coach Ryan Ward, and Katie Strang says Kyle Okposo and Jack Hillen "will play."
Huh? I Thought This was a Pens-Senators Post?
Ah yes, so it is. The defending champs versus the Sutton Campolis. Minus Alexei Kovalev. Interesting.
(4) Pittsburgh Penguins (47-28-7) vs. (5) Ottawa Senators (44-32-6)
| Wednesday, April 14 | at Pittsburgh, 7:00 p.m. | CBC, VERSUS | |
| Friday, April 16 | at Pittsburgh, 7:00 p.m. | CBC, VERSUS | |
| Sunday, April 18 | at Ottawa, 6:30 p.m. | CBC, VERSUS | |
| Tuesday, April 20 | at Ottawa, 7:00 p.m. | CBC, VERSUS | |
| *Thursday, April 22 | at Pittsburgh, 7:00 p.m. | CBC, VERSUS | |
| *Saturday, April 24 | at Ottawa, 7:00 p.m. | CBC, VERSUS | |
| *Tuesday, April 27 | at Pittsburgh, 7:00 p.m. | CBC | |
Reasons to Pick the Penguins: Playoff experience, goaltending, two lottery stars, NHL favoritism. Ottawa's powerplay is weak, and their .88 GF/GA at 5-on-5 is in the vicinity of the Islanders and Hurricanes. PK is mighty good though.
Reasons to Pick the Senators: Andy Sutton hasn't been in the playoffs in four years, and he's never won a playoff game. All that pent-up energy, he just might knock a Penguin or two out and alter the series. Beyond that...I got nothing.
Reasons to Root for the Senators: Matt Cooke. Also: If you hate Crosby. Or if you want Sutton or Campoli to do well.
Reasons to Root for the Penguins: Jarkko Ruutu. Also: If you like Sutton and want him to discover that the grass is never greener so he might as well come back, for cheap, at just one year. Or if you covet Anton Volchenkov and want him to discover that the grass here sucks, he might as well take the money and jump to the Islanders, for a little more, for a few more years..
Or maybe you think ol' Captain Billy McNulty Guerin deserves even more postseason love. Or if you think a furrowed-brow Penguin is cuter than a Trojan logo.
In all seriousness: I like what Cory Clouston has done in Ottawa, but they should be outmanned by the Pens, and the defending champs won't be going down that easily, this early. That said, this is not an ideal first-round matchup. I suppose that's obvious when you're talking about facing the 5th seed, but there you go. It's still true.
So that I'm not hiding behind my own poll: Head says Penguins in six. Heart says I'd love to see the underdog stun Pittsburgh and ruin the marketers' dreams of a Pens-Capitals rematch. (In truth, a Pens-Caps rematch would be cool, I can't deny it. You want to knock off the guys who beat you the year before.)
How about you?
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Not going to be close. Anton Volchenkov, come on dowwwwnnnn.
by Nova Scotia Isles Fan on Apr 12, 2010 7:33 PM EDT reply actions
I’d love to see the Senators win, they always give me the feeling of a plucky underdog as long as Yashin’s not on the team. They were just such a group of loveable losers when they got into the league.
Mauldin Played for Columbus a few years ago, He has six career games.
sadly,
I think we’re those loveable losers now
"Look at me! I'm Tomokazu Ohka of the Montreal Expos!"
Lovable losers are a team that has never won anything. Ottaway has never won anything. The Islanders have won more playoff series in a row than any other team in the history of major league sports.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Apr 13, 2010 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions
I disagree
The Chicago Cubs are practically synonymous with the “lovable losers” tag and they won back-to-back World Series in 1907 and 1908 and were NL champs in 1906 and 1910.
You don’t have to agree with me, but, if I remember correctly, the last time the Islanders won a playoff series, Al Arbour was coaching full seasons.
"Look at me! I'm Tomokazu Ohka of the Montreal Expos!"
i disagree
i’m just gonna disagree with calling the cubs “lovable”…
by isles in arkansas on Apr 14, 2010 1:49 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I said Pens in 5
But I’m really hoping for continuous OT in game 7 that lasts 5 days… OK that’s a pipe dream, but seriously how cool would that be?
A dream come true
I swear sometimes I watch playoff games just for the hope of eternal OT. Pretty sad, but I probably have more vivid memories of lengthy OTs ending than I do of any meaningful accomplishments in life.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
I think the rule is once 6OTs end, you restart the game.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on Apr 13, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions
Rule 84.5
The entire rule is very simple: “84.5 Overtime – Playoffs – In the Stanley Cup Playoffs, when a game is tied after three (3) twenty (20) minute regular periods of play, the teams shall take a normal intermission (fifteen (15) minutes) and resume playing twenty (20) minute periods, changing ends for the start of each overtime period. The team scoring the first goal in overtime shall be declared the winner of the game.” There is no mention of a maximum.
I don’t think it would make sense to “start over” because instead of needing only one goal to finally send people home, you’d be guaranteeing that the teams play another full 60 minutes! I mean, if you get through six OTs and start over, that’s FOUR full games of hockey. Guys would be coughing up hunks of their own livers.
Of course I'm an expert, I've seen Slap Shot eleven times!
Alright, I guess I got confused with the longest game ever, which went into 6OTs.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on Apr 14, 2010 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I’d love to see the Sens take this but …
Sutton has never been on a team that has ever won a playoff game? Its info like that that keeps me coming back…Thanks for doing such a great job this season Dom, you’re always thanking us but you’re the one who puts all the work into this…we just blather on and on while you continue to give us great topics, links, stats and perhaps most importantly you foster a friendly environment where all opinions are allowed. I appreciate what you do!
Wow that was the most emotion that I’ve written since my anniversery card to my wife
Thanks
I’m telling my lady I elicited sentiment worthy of an anniversary card, and I have to talk to my accountant but hopefully, you know, that gets me some points and doesn’t bump me up into the wrong tax bracket.
But it’s true: Sutton’s four playoff games were with Atlanta when the were swept by … some other team.
Lighthouse Hockey: Playing the NHL Lotto
I know everyone hates the Penguins
but I live in DC, and when the Isles are eliminated I generally root for the Caps, and I really, really want to see a Caps-Pens series. I just think that would be a hell of a lot of fun to watch, and I’d love to see the Caps take out the Pens.
2009 Did Not Happen
Agreed!
That would be fantastic…unless the refs start dictating the series.
Please let Roloson and Biron be the guest announcers on some Chicago playoff broadcasts...please hockey Gods!
by metalcoconut on Apr 13, 2010 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I went with my head too. Penguins in six.
I’m ROFL about Lawton and Tocchet. Hey, Lawton was a number-one overall draft pick! What was Tocchet, fifth round? Do they even count that high? Piker. So what if he had as many assists as Lawton had games played in the league? Or four times as many points?
Of course I'm an expert, I've seen Slap Shot eleven times!
Oh those desperate Ranger fans trying to cover for their team missing the playoffs…it must be painful to be that ignorant.
However, is Cooke going to be back for this series? If so, would it be wrong to wish for a Sutton Section hit? Perhaps if he can take out Ponikarovsky and Cooke in one fell swoop? Actually he would probably become just about everyone’s fan favorite if he managed to do anything remotely close to that.
Unfortunately I believe the Pens in 4. This is not much of a matchup for the Pens and I can’t see giving much of a fight. Although I am with Dom in thinking that an underdog victory would be sweet.
I believe the under over for how many times Crosby whines to the refs should be pretty low. I’ll give it 5 times throughout the series. If Malkin and Guerin both struggle then perhaps the Sens win a game but I find that to be doubtful at best.
Please let Roloson and Biron be the guest announcers on some Chicago playoff broadcasts...please hockey Gods!
Pens in 6, Elliott won't be up to task
I think the Pens just have a little more depth and Fluery has proven he can step up a little in the playoffs.
In Canada...
Senators are appointed, not elected. They have the easiest jobs on earth, don’t even have to show up to get their paycheques. Unfortunately I expect the hockey version will do much the same in this series. I’ve voted Pens in five since I think anything could happen in one game but I’d be surprised if it went any further than that :)
Pens – depth, experience and desire – when they don’t fall asleep or lose interest. That factor makes me say Pens in 6, sooner if they stay awake and keep pushing the pedal.
Looking for a Caps-Pens Final this year, but there is a good way to go here.
Tampa gave up on Tocchet too soon, but that’s another subject. I see both Lawton and Tocchet going elsewhere.
It's always a great day or night for hockey - no matter the time or place!
Tampa gave up on Tocchet too soon, but that’s another subject.
I’m all ears, if you care to go into it. I did not see evidence that Tocchet was a good coach — in spirit, yes, but in tactics, no. That said, I definitely did not see enough of him to feel like I could make that call. So I’m just going on intuition and what I’ve read.
Lighthouse Hockey: Playing the NHL Lotto

by 













































