Bruins 3, Islanders 2: Well...Moulson and Bailey scored
An unlucky bounce off the glass gave the Bruins an insurance goal to make it 3-1. A failed Islanders five-minute powerplay that straddled the second intermission was probably their best shot to turn things around. Leading goal-scorer (23) Matt Moulson struck again, with 5:43 left, to give the Isles a shot.
By the end, the Isles outshot the B's 39-34, but a re-energized Tim Thomas helped ensure nothing came of it.
Game Sum. | Event Sum. | Corsi | Recaps: nhl.com | Isles
Still, this was Moulson's 20th even-strength goal of the year. I hope fans realize how impressive that is. He's leading the team in goals without the benefit of the powerplay (though he gets his share of PP ice time) -- which is where most NHL scorers pad their stats. All he does is get in position, go to the net -- and convert. May the legend of Matty Mo continue into next season, even if his current 13.9 shooting percentage drops off a bit by then.
Evidence of Saturday Hockey
A few brief notes before opening the floor (bullets!):
- John Tavares looked a little more creative at times today, but as one wondered during the game thread: I mean, surely he'll score again this season, right? It's been 17 games since the last one, and there are now 17 games left.
- Nice job by Josh Bailey and company crashing the net for the rebound on Bailey's powerplay goal that tied it at 1-1. The Bailey/Nielsen/Okposo line looked alright.
- Rob Schremp has been a steady, dependable center even when he gets the scraps in terms of wingers.
- Dustin Kohn: Jury still very much out on him (obviously -- it's early, he's young, etc.). He's being eased in, and the thin blueline all around does not help. But it's safe to say I understand why Andrew MacDonald was higher than Kohn on the organizational depth chart.
- Dwayne Roloson was fine. But if Scott Gordon says he's going with the hot hand for starts in goal now, then surely it's Martin Biron's turn next?
- The five-minute powerplay came from Michael Ryder driving Blake Comeau into the boards from behind. It wasn't as awful as that sounds -- though Comeau was down on the ice getting treatment long enough for the stretcher to come out. But it was a case where Ryder has to be more careful, considering he's staring at an opponent's numbers and driving him into the boards; it's that, or risk putting your team down for a while.
Not much else to remark. Enjoy your Saturday and leave any thoughts/reactions in ye ol' comment section.
0 recs |
18 comments
|
Comments
Did the math
This is the 12th game of the season they’ve lost by 1 goal in regulation. I realize how hated the current OT point system is, but still, if they had managed to score one more goal in half those games and go into OT they would be tied for 8th right now. That’s without considering games that the Islanders might have had an empty netter scored against them and lost by 2.
It’s a really thin margin between where the Islanders are right now and where they could be. You can take it to the other extreme, if the Islanders don’t have 8 OTLs and just lost those games they’d only be 2 points ahead of Toronto right now.
We’ve definitely improved though.
Last season we finished at 61 Points, we have 60 now.
Last season we finished with 26 Wins, we have 26 now.
Last season finished with 47 Losses, 30 now and they might not finish with 40
I just think its a team on the rise, and we have reason to be hopeful for next season.
Please NBC, Fire Milbury, Hire Roenick Full time!!!
All things considered
the boys did pretty well. There were at least 2 goals which Tim Thomas single-handedly stole away. This game could have gone the other way, and that makes the pill easier to swallow.
First of all, happy the Isles had an afternoon game so that I can watch Big Andy now on Hockey Night In Canada ;-)
To me, one of the bigger question marks around the team lately have been the incredibly poor starts game after game. There surely were a few, but I hardly remember any bad start into a game in the first three months of the season. They always were ready and played some excellent opening periods also against tough opposition. But ever since the end of that good run in mid-January, they’ve been awful at the beginnings, even in the games they won.
The first game they lost after their best run was at Pittsburgh, 4-6. If I remember correctly the play was ok early in the game, they unluckily were down 0-3 after 27 minutes, but that was when it all started…
vs. Florida, 2-1 SO, 0-1 after 30 horrible minutes, outshot 6-14 in the first period.
vs. New Jersey, 2-4, outshot 5-13 in the first (0-1).
vs. Washington, 2-7, 1-4 after first.
at Carolina, 1-4, 0-2 after first.
at Philadelphia, 1-2, 0-2 after first.
at Florida, 0-2, good first for once in terms of shots (15-6), but down 0-1
at Tampa, 2-5, ok first (1-1, 14-10 shots)
vs. Carolina, 1-3, 0-1 after first (11-8 shots).
vs. Nashville, 4-3 SO, 0-0 after first, outshot 3-9
at Pittsburgh, 1-3, 0-0 after first (12-9 shots)
vs. Tampa, 5-4, 1-2 after first, outshot 9-14
vs. Ottawa, 3-4, 1-1 after first (9-11 shots)
vs. Chicago, 5-3, 1-2 after first, outshot 9-22
at Atlanta, 3-6, 0-4 after 14 minutes
vs. Boston, 2-3, 0-1 after first, outshot 4-16
That’s 0-12-4 in the first period since the end of that good run. And there indeed were only about three or four of these 16 periods not poor. That’s quite incredible paricularly compared to early in the season, when they were really good mostly at the beginnings. Does anybody have an explanation?
Not the main reason, but a part of it might be that many teams didn’t take the Isles too seriously early in the season and found themselves down by a goal or two after the first period. But since that good run by the Isles until mid-January everyone might have been a bit more ready to play them hard from the get-go. That however would mean this team could be further away than we might think from the impressions of the first three months of the season…
Interesting
I have no explanation, but it is a concern. And even in the sort of “new NHL” where coming back is (theoretically) more achievable, obviously bad starts are dooming them — whereas hot starts were keys to a lot of their wins earlier this season. When they got other teams on their heels early, they had more wins or at least survived until OT.
I think I buy teams are taking them more seriously now — no early Moulson goals to take them by surprise lately.
Lighthouse Hockey: Under contract through 2021, knees and hips be damned.
You would think that the Gordon system would be more conducive to doing well in the 1st period than it has lately.
Very interesting Ben (I reckon your post would have been good as a fanpost btw).
Very interesting Ben (I reckon your post would have been good as a fanpost btw).
Agreed! And you can still fire it up that way, if you like.
Lighthouse Hockey: Under contract through 2021, knees and hips be damned.
I have noticed this also
I haven’t broken down the numbers as much but during our streak we had strong starts, even scoring within the first couple of minutes. Lately we play a real bad 1st or if we play good in the offensive zone, but give up quality chances back. It seems goalies are always stopping are chances early, or the posts.
Maybe they need a hard skate early, or maybe they are skating to hard in practice and lose their legs. whatever the routine is before the game, they need to do the opposite.
by Rickfansince76 on Mar 8, 2010 8:44 AM EST up reply actions
It doesn't pay to compare this year's record w/ last year's
because part of that can be explained by having Roly vs two depth goalies. Another part can be explained by a much more serious injury problem last year.
Look at the pluses for this year. We had real finds in Moulson and Schremp. Moulson, in particular, looks like star material. The Moulson—Tavares—Okposo line has real potential as a top line. Okposo, Bailey, Hillen, and MacDonald have taken big steps forward in their development. Comeau is starting to look like the real thing as well.
Part of the future is still in the system. Players like De Haan, Hamonic, Donovan, Martin, Cizikas, Lee, and others are part of the future. JT and the aforementioned all have yet to show us anywhere near their full potential. I see this team as really becoming a big time contender possibly in 2012-13. Given that the 2011 draft is supposed to be weak, this upcoming draft is absolutely critical. We need a forward with elite top six potential to make the second line potent enough that opposing defenses can’t just key on the Tavares line. We also need 1-2 quality defensive prospects and a PF prospect.
Lighthouse and DP are the two albatrosses that this franchise needs to shed. If DP can’t play, he needs to retire. If Wang isn’t going to accept the diminished version of Lighthouse TOH will allow him, he needs to move aggressively to get things done with another location—probably Queens. Given how I feel about the Wilpons tearing down Shea in favor of their personal ATM and Mr. Shea’s involvement in the foundation of this franchise, I would not be against calling it Shea Center. It would be wonderful if we could bring the Cup back to the Island BEFORE 2015. Then perhaps Islander fans could get together and buy billboard space as near as possible to TOH offices and have a sign with a pic of the guys celebrating with the Cup and the message: “You LOST Kate!”
Pretty fair criticism all around. The goaltending margin and injuries is a worthy point compared to last year.
I still think they have been better all around this season, though, and last year’s points total was inflated by a late, pressure-free, youth-led burst after they were long since out of it. In a league where the margin is still pretty thin from 15-25th overall, from 6-13th in the conference, I still see this season’s hanging around the bubble as, well … progress.
Lighthouse Hockey: Under contract through 2021, knees and hips be damned.
I guess my point is
to not really focus on the team point totals at all because I think last year’s was artificially bad. Remember, instead, that this year was always supposed to be a developmental year and we have made some important developmental strides. Also, we have seen proff of Jimmy D’s assertion that the fans would come back if the team started to get competitive. During that exciting run, there were a number of sellouts.
Sutton
Sutton played extremely well for the Sens tonight, some big hits. Don Cherry and others were commenting on what a great pick up he was and how they thought a late second was such a reasonable price.
Schremp on the Bergie
Sean looked good in his return from the doghouse… but he’s still in the yard. Before this season is over, if they’re not going ot bring up one of the larger LW’s (Jesse or Matt), then I’d like to see Bergie go out with a fight… and by that I mean he needs second line minutes with Schremp and Comeau(if healthy). That includes PP minutes.
Here it is
Video on YouTube. Not surprised the NHL didn’t show it.
Sort of surprised Jack Edwards didn’t immediately rant about it being a penalty.
Lighthouse Hockey: Under contract through 2021, knees and hips be damned.
Here is the take of the NESN talking heads:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRl5fxm_vBg&NR=1
All agree with the call, although the guy here is making excuses for Ryder.
I honestly don’t mind excuses for Ryder in this instance. If Comeau skates toward the back of the net, then Ryder delivers a good check. This is one of those speed-of-the-game incidents.
Lighthouse Hockey: Under contract through 2021, knees and hips be damned.
should have brought a guy in? or call back Martin
It seems like many teams get a spark from a new guy, Atlanta was the opitime of new chemistry.
Garth should have made a deal, moved someone. I think th eteam looks stale.
th team looked pumped with Martin before the break. I would arther see him back up then Jackman with the face sheild. Jackman is useless if he can’t intimidate, that is the biggest part of his game, and needed more without Sutton. martin was able to park in front of the G on the PP an dhe was able to scrap and more importantly move bodies out of the way. I say bring hi back, and make Jackman a healthy scratch.

by 





























