Rangers 4, Islanders 3: Another season in the books
Well, that first period was nice.
I had two on-ice contests to still really cheer for -- both of them this week -- and the Isles dropped the ball on first one with an awful 5-on-3 and some lovely one-piece stick luck. The season series finishes "3-3" from the Isles' perspective, but their December OT win means the Rangers took the points and the glossier 3-2-1 record.
Game Sum. | Event Sum. | Corsi | Recaps: nhl.com | Isles | BB
I'm not a big believer in the Church of Momentum as it's tossed around by broadcasters, but I do believe in the collective confidence and psychological shifts within a team. Getting a 2-0 jump on your rivals, then giving one back and failing to convert on a minute-long 5-on-3 can certainly change the collective confidence levels among two fragile squads.
In fairness, the 5-on-3 was not bad. They created chances, they just didn't convert. Stuff like a shot wide, a good pass to the slot eluding Matt Moulson ... those were the breaks that extinguished it. But a rival gives you a chance, you have to make 'em pay. The rest of the 2nd period lacked the assertiveness that got the Isles the early lead.
Game Highlights
Scott Gordon Post-Game, with lots of Experience Caveats for Garth to Fix
How about that Prescience?
Just yesterday BenHasna and I were discussing Blake Comeau's ideal position and how he's more dangerous when coming down the left wing on his offhand shot, as opposed to when he comes down the right side and tends to circle the perimeter. Sure enough, early in the first Comeau breaks down the left side to fire an assertive shot that Henrik got a piece of, but could not keep out.
How about that Prescience ... Not so Much
It's automatic: Any time I discuss a line as if Scott Gordon might stick with it ... well I should just assume that line will be no more within 24 hours. Jeff Tambellini not only didn't play with John Tavares and Comeau, he didn't play, period (healthy scratch). As a lineup decision, that doesn't bother me -- though keeping level at even strength, the trio hadn't created any offense in the previous two games -- but as a chronicler of events it does warn me not to think too hard about anything, because it will change tomorrow.
Cue Howie One-Piece Stick Rant
On the Islanders' first powerplay, which came from the Rangers' jaw-dropping early too many men penalty, John Tavares broke his stick on the initial faceoff and had to go straight to the bench. This is two minutes into the game. Later, Mark Streit's stick broke on an attempted one-timer during the 5-on-4 that remained after the failed 5-on-3. Finally, Kyle Okposo's stick broke on an attempted clear in the Isles zone, and what looked like a harmless under-control play became a quick turnover and they tying goal over Dwayne Roloson's shoulder.
That's some Yugo-esque reliability for a stick that retails somewhere around $200. When the equipment manufacturers can sell most of the NHL on sticks that cost $200 but continually break at critical moments, the terrorists have already won.
But hey ... at least those lovely RBK (vowels not included) EDGE uniform SYSTEMS have increased player speed league-wide.
This and That
Why Vengeance is Hard: Trevor Gillies' roughing penalty late in the 2nd was really soft but by the book. Which points to the whole danger of having enforcers exacting your revenge for you. Brandon Prust dangerously decked Tavares from behind earlier in the game. The best response is always to lay a weasel out (or that weasel's star teammate) with a good hard check -- or maybe even an illegal check, if necessary -- during gameplay. Not during scrums when refs are looking for excuses to put their mark on the game.
Welcome Sight: John Tavares using his body to win puck battles and make defensive plays.
Unwelcome Sight: I really don't know what Prust was doing killing penalties during the Rangers' playoff push, but checking Tavares from behind is both a stupid and dangerous tactic. Shame the Isles never made him pay.
Welcome Sight: Fire from Streit and Okposo on Brandon Dubinsky after Dubinsky mildly poked at Dwayne Roloson. As a fan, I really hate post-whistle scrubs -- really, they're simply ridiculous displays of misplaced testosterone 85% of the time, one of those pointless features that's ingrained in the game and makes Don Cherry tear up. But this team will need some band-of-brothers displays from time to time as they evolve, and it's nice to see guys like Streit, Nielsen and Okposo will be among those to show it.
Welcome Sight: Mark Streit unleashing that cannon we need more of on the powerplay. Later, at even strength, it made the loudest clang off the crossbar that you ever did hear. Tough luck with the puck in his skates on Gaborik's go-ahead goal though.
...More: It could be just my Frans fanaticism, but I like this Frans Nielsen on the powerplay point. He's a good puck mover and a quick decision-maker, and a bonus is he's another to help win the faceoff.
...and More: Welcome back, Andrew MacDonald. Twenty minutes, +1, and a goal-saving shot block (one of three).
...and Finally: The way Comeau's second goal dribbled in was even funnier than his first.
The Finn with the Random Pulse Hates the Dane Who's All Heart: Olli Jokinen, who somehow "earned" first star, is apparently jealous of Frans Nielsen's ability to show up night after night. Olli took a 15-foot long charge attempt against Nielsen (it just missed) in the first period. In the second, on an invalid faceoff where Olli was thrown out, before departing the dot he up and cross-checked Nielsen. I hope Glen Sather decides to keep him around for many millions that shall be earned once every seven games.
Quote of the Night: Dwayne Roloson, on the whole rivalry thing: "Every loss is a loss."
* * *
Mild Solace: Every team the Rangers are chasing won. So there's that.
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Don't really want to talk about the loss so...
here goes. I’ve been trying to dig up something on the Rakhshani front, and finally found a tidbit? maybe.
Captain Rhett Rakhshani, drafted by the New York Islanders, does not have final plans to leave yet, he said, but could be leaving as early as this week. Rakhshani graduated after winter quarter.
This from DU’s Clarion
Kid is already graduated… I’m kind of wondering what exactly is going on to make him hesitate. Frustrating to know he can go but he might have cold feet. I’m all for players graduating before making the leap, but I wonder what could be affecting that decision, any ideas?
Islanders in 3D? At least we won't have to worry about them playing flat in the third!
Rhett the threat...
I think he’s just licking his wounds after a surprising defeat at the hands of an unlikely foe.
The other option is he might be waiting to pull a Blake Wheeler. Since he’s 4 years past his draft year and an NCAA prospect he becomes a UFA July 1st.
We're doomed. Doomed!
by David Hanssen on Mar 31, 2010 4:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Just throwing my opinion and some knowledge in here…as of the last CBA, NCAA players are granted a 5 year amnesty and not 2 years. Rhett is still Islanders property until NEXT year.
From the Penalty Box to the Blog Box! Check it out at Isles Official's Outlook!
by IslesOfficial on Mar 31, 2010 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions
We’re both wrong I think, Article 8, Section C, Subsection 1 of the CBA:
If a Player drafted at age 18 or 19 is a bona fide college student at
the time of his selection in the Entry Draft, or becomes a bona fide
college student prior to the first June 1 following his selection in
the Entry Draft, and remains a bona fide college student through
the graduation of his college class, his drafting Club shall retain the
exclusive right of negotiation for his services through and
including the August 15 following the graduation of his college
class. The Club need not make a Bona Fide Offer to such Player to
retain such rights.
Since he’s already graduated, the Isles keep his rights until August 15th.
We're doomed. Doomed!
by David Hanssen on Mar 31, 2010 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions
That would suck!
The Wheeler situation seems a lot more likely with that bit of information… and probably why we haven’t heard a peep from the Islanders about it.
With Okposo and Comeau ahead of him, and the possibility of Petrov competing for a top six spot in 2011-12 who could blame him.
So… when you consider this year’s draft, add this BS to the mix. EVEN PROSPECTS MAY NOT WANT TO COME TO THE ISLES.
Well.. let’s hope it works out like the Wheeler deal… two years later Phoenix is 4th in their [better] conference while Boston is still struggling to make the playoffs… with cap issues to boot.
Wang doesn't need to fire Gordon, just ask him how to address the third period meltdowns... and he'll just walk away.
Is he even close to being as highly regarded as Wheeler was, though? Could he really command that much more money than an entry-level contract?
I suppose the advantage of holding out would be getting your choice of (a few) teams. But signing with the team that drafted you gets you the security of an entry level deal and gets you started on your initiation now vs. late in the summer.
I guess I’m too worried about the lack of news … yet.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
UFA...pronounced... OOOFA!!!
IMHO, and I like what I’ve seen from Rhett (limited sample), he’d be tagged for BP next year. He’d have a good opportunity to make teh team at some point within the next two years, but with Okie, Comeau and Hunter’s contract I wouldn’t hold my breath. I would say that his play would be to go to a team that has a spot for him NOW, and being a contender wouldn’t be bad either. Who knows who’s been whispering in his agent’s ear.
Wang doesn't need to fire Gordon, just ask him how to address the third period meltdowns... and he'll just walk away.
Is he even close to being as highly regarded as Wheeler was, though?
No, he’s not. Wheeler was a top 10 pick remember. He could also be doing a Martin “hold out to see how much I can squeeze out of the Islanders” too.
We're doomed. Doomed!
by David Hanssen on Mar 31, 2010 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions
These are what I’m thinking. If he’s hardly an automatic for a spot with the Isles, I can’t fathom what better playing option another team would give him. And if the Islanders are low-balling or his camp is holding firm, they can’t be fighting over more than relative scraps.
So I don’t want to read into his status yet. He’s a nice player, I look forward to seeing what he can do, but the future does not ride on him.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
Botta just tweeted that rakhshani signed, will report and make AHL debut. Didn’t mean to cause this much of a stir, sorry about that guys, was looking for some ideas, not necessarily panic. My bad on that.
Islanders in 3D? At least we won't have to worry about them playing flat in the third!
Strang twice with the misspelling, ah… the beginning of a budding career.
Islanders in 3D? At least we won't have to worry about them playing flat in the third!
Don’t worry about it. I was just openly brain farting this morning after 3 hours of sleep and waaaay to much beer last night (Brau von Aying!).
We're doomed. Doomed!
by David Hanssen on Mar 31, 2010 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions
For some reason this question came to mind; can you see Katie’s tweets for free?
I know… I need to see a professional.
Wang doesn't need to fire Gordon, just ask him how to address the third period meltdowns... and he'll just walk away.
1st – Yes it’s free
2nd – Isn’t that what this is for?
We're doomed. Doomed!
by David Hanssen on Mar 31, 2010 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Didn’t mean to cause this much of a stir, sorry about that guys, was looking for some ideas, not necessarily panic. My bad on that.
No worries. Not at all. We need stuff to fret and kvetch about every now and then.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
The tale of missing Islanders...
As i watched tonight’s game unfold and then unravel, i cant help but wonder when Trent Hunter was going to have a significant impact on the team. Not every player can be a gamebreaker, this much i understand. But if tonight wasn’t evidence enough as to the fragility of our team then i don’t know what is. Garth Snow will have to realize that the isles rebuild will take more than a few top picks to set this ship aright. July 1st will be Mr. Snows grad entrance or…..well at least it will be interesting
Hunter actually made a couple of nice defensive plays, I don’t recall who he stopped, but there was a wide open net and he cleared the puck to the back boards before the Ranger could deposit it into the empty net. For some reason his hitting appears to be way down this year and that makes him less effective. It seems they asked him to back off the hitting to generate more offense and it has had the opposite affect.
Hunter's hitting/offense
Sometimes I wonder if he’s dialed back the hitting on his own because of the injuries he’s had.
But his offense really hasn’t tapered that much: It’s the same streaky nature as it usually is, except he’s getting less powerplay time now. Relative to his teammates, at even strength Pts./60 he’s still about where you’d expect a third-line winger to be.
Basically, I see him now as a reliable (defensively) winger for the third-line with a shot that will occasionally get you some offense. That he isn’t needed as much on the PP anymore means they’re steadily upgrading their talent level.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
been disappointed by Hunter too
Yeah the only time he played good this season, with any consistency, was when he first came back in the beginning of the season. He had points in his first bunch of games (5G,6A in first 11 games), and timely goals. Since(14pts in 44 games) he has been mostly a non factor and not just his scoring, he seems to be standing still almost, somehow he is a +4 though.
by Rickfansince76 on Mar 31, 2010 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions
somehow he is a +4 though.
1) Frans Nielsen. 2) Hunter’s a smart defensive/positional player.
His offensive output is disappointing (to what degree, depends on your expectations), but Hunter knows the defensive side of the puck. His lack of speed deceives. And Nielsen helps.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
I’m certainly not a Hunter hater, I think the team has so few professionals that he adds tremendous value. The younger guys have more talent, but they still don’t approach the game and do all of the little things that go unnoticed like Hunter does. Hunter is a third line guy and his numbers hurt because we need more from everyone, but that’s because the top end hasn’t reached their full potential yet.
Dear Hunter
I was pretty enthusiastic when Hunter came onto the scene. Maybe, like most Islander fans I mis-labeled him. That doesn’t mean that he isn’t worth our appreciation, it may be more that our expectations in some areas are too high.
1. Hunter has been on a roller coaster offensively. I can cut him some slack there because he’s been through 4 coaches (Sterling, Shaw, Nolan, Gordon) in 6 years… sprinkle in the prep work that he did to play under Lavy and he’s been shuffled around more than any other Islander without changing his address.
2. Through that same period he has been solid defensively except when he lost Sillinger, and the whole team sucked in Nolan’s second year.
3. Hunter has finished checks for 6 years (even though I think he needs to learn how to create potential energy, then disburse it when he does make contact)… the only time he’s let up on quantity has been in a system where a forecheck mandates his positioning take precedence over the delay to the backcheck that finishing a check requires. this due to his lack of excelertion.
4. Hunter may have been overpaid. Not in the astronomical sense that our beloved perpetual rehabber goaltender was… but in a way that says, “you should be a top 6 RW putting up 25-30 goals a year”, not playing the third line shutdown role.
5. He lacks [outward] ENTHUSIASM, but is a great lunchpail guy. He is a poster child for what needs to change on this club in regards to ATTITUDE. (See RSH)
6. He’ll often stand up for teammates… but he skates backwards while doing so. Hunter needs to SKATE FORWARD and be that BIG SWINGING **** (well, you know) that a guy his size should be when he’s the MAN OF THE HOUSE.
Hunter is a fine hockey player… but he really could be so much more under a psychologist’s care. Somebody needs to hypnotize him and turn him into Billy Guerin. (that might also require a skating/hands guru)…. but if you’ll remember the Trent Hunter we had when Smyth was here… IT’S POSSIBLE.
Wang doesn't need to fire Gordon, just ask him how to address the third period meltdowns... and he'll just walk away.
Gillies
I have been unimpressed with him, he seems to take penalties without drawing them. I like a guy who will fight, but that roughing was a dumb play. I really liked Martin better in that role
Mild Solace: Every team the Rangers are chasing won. So there’s that.
At least there’s that…because that was one frustrating game last night.
Prospal’s goal was perhaps the worst goal that Rollie has given up all year
Public Address Parentuaeiou (sp) was on the ice for 3 of the 4 Rags goals
It’s getting harder for me to listen to Scott Blah Blah Blah Gordon
sorry but I’m depressed by this
sorry but I’m depressed by this
Haha, no problem, let it out.
I am very glad I got back and knew the result before I watched it. Would not have liked to see that go down in real time.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
Dump the dump dynamic
I’d really like the NHL to leap out to the front and change their draft system to make the second half exciting for ALL TEAMS. I’m not crazy about Snow’s “play in” system, but I would like first half flame outs to have something to play for.
What better way to do that than to move the cheese.
draft order from 15-30 remains the same. But they need to reverse the draft order from 1-14 and have a lottery for the top three spots… with the worst team getting the most balls.
This would mean that if you played hard and just missed the playoffs you wouldn’t be PUNISHED automatically with the WORST POSSIBLE SCENARIO… no playoff revenue, and the 14th pick in the draft.
My scenario would have the 17th team in the league having the #1 pick in the draft, and then the 30th team having the most balls in teh hopper to try to get that pick.
It doesn’t sound appealing if you’re 30th… but what the hell… your 30th, your organization sucks (we should all know about organizations that SUCK)… and you’ll still have a good shot at getting a top 3 pick.
And winning would be more beneficial than losing to teams out of the playoffs.
I wonder if anything like that has been proposed at teh GM meetings before.
Wang doesn't need to fire Gordon, just ask him how to address the third period meltdowns... and he'll just walk away.
I may be a believer
This would mean that if you played hard and just missed the playoffs you wouldn’t be PUNISHED automatically with the WORST POSSIBLE SCENARIO… no playoff revenue, and the 14th pick in the draft.
I’m normally opposed to any plan that doesn’t reward a tortured fanbase for its season of misery. “Teams shouldn’t be rewarded for being incompetent,” etc. doesn’t sit well with me because in my book it’s the tortured FANS who are being rewarded for putting up with crap and expensive parking/beer/in-game audio abuse for 41/82 games.
HOWEVER, I like this idea to reward the just-miss teams and provide an incentive to keep on keeping on. All season I’ve hoped the Rangers would either get the 8th or 9th seed, ensuring both playoff failure/miss and the worst possible draft scenario along with it. Why? Because the league has become so youth dependent, that ugly middle is the worst spot to be in. So yeah, I’m a fan of the JPinVA lottery plan. You’re not screwing the 30th-place teams, but you’re giving the bubble teams a reason to fight the good fight.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
This is what I proposed on another site when Snow came up with his dumb playoff plan two weeks ago. You couldn’t dump players and salaries and every team would have to play to win every game. No rewards for losing.
when Snowcame up with hishad to submit Wang’s dumb playoff plan
Fixed, according to a few reports that trickled afterward.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
Sorry Snow, you present it, you own it. Part of taking the GM salary. Next time say “No Sir Mr Wang, I cannot lose all credbility amongst my peers by bringing up such an asinine suggestion.”
Heh, true and fair enough. I just assume being Wang’s GM contains certain unavoidable yes-men moments, so pick your spots. Floating that plan was harmless. Saying, “Sure, training camp in China is fine” is another matter…
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
I think I like this idea.
Perhaps today IS a good day to die.
- Klingon proverb
by Thomas Wachtel on Mar 31, 2010 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions

by 










































