Islanders 5, Canucks 2: John Tavares career night, Reese's 1st NHL goal
This was one of those games where the 37-20 shot differential does not tell the story, because the Islanders hit enough iron (four posts, one crossbar) to blow it open at any moment, and failing that they played defensive but not on-your-heels hockey to protect a two-goal lead in the third period.
John Tavares was behind three others in rookie scoring when his night began. Five points and three hours later he'd leaped over Tyler Myers and Niclas Bergfors, becoming the Islanders' second 20-goal scorer in the process. With a hand in every goal -- and frankly, his three assists were more impressive than his two goals -- it was easily the most dominant night of 91's young career.
Game Sum. | Event Sum. | Corsi | Recaps: nhl.com | Isles
For anyone's lightly muffled lottery desires, it was bad news (Carolina and Tampa Bay lost, though Atlanta won). But for long-term signs of player progress, it was fantastic:
There was Tavares, but there was also another night of smart hockey from Matt "Coulson", who scored on a great JT feed and also provided the block-out-the-Sun screen on Dylan Reese's first NHL goal. Blake Comeau led all forwards with 21:06 spread across PP, SH and EV. Blueline newbs Reese (+2) and Dustin Kohn handled themselves well, while Freddy Meyer, Mark Streit and Bruno Gervais had excellent efforts at both ends. The Isles blocked 21 shots to bend, not break.
Oh yeah: And they did it all without Kyle Okposo, day-to-day with the proverbial "upper body." But there's so much more to mention.
Game Highlights: JT, JT, JT, JT and JT
Juicy Bits of Win
- Dwayne Roloson was square and solid all night -- exactly the performance you'd expect from him for the Islanders to pull out a win. He resisted the oft-apparent urge to bring out the baseball swing.
- The powerplay tallied once in four tries, while the PK was 100% for the third consecutive game (albeit on a light night, 2 for 2).
- Trent Hunter was back and looked healthy, ringing the post on a backhand after a set of nifty moves in the slot. He had a chance to ice the game on a third-period 2-on-1, but Andrew Raycroft got the glove up.
- That's right: Raycroft was in because the Islanders chased Roberto Luongo with four goals on 12 shots through two periods (plus posts by Hunter, "Coulson," Tavares and Gervais).
- Josh Bailey didn't feature on the score sheet, but his smooth passing was on display (at times he had linemates who are not what you'd call "finishers"), and in one fantastic Go-Go Gordon Forecheck sequence he teamed with Sean Bergenheim and Hunter to force a turnover in the Canucks zone and create not one but two prime scoring chances for himself. One of them hit the crossbar behind Raycroft.
- Frans Nielsen was gritty and Fransy, but so much else went right I can take this night off from praising him. (Although like every night, he was the best Dane on the ice.)
- Congratulations to Dylan Reese on his 1st NHL goal, a smart shot from the point that will become "a blistering cannon" when he tells his grandkids a few decades from now. A couple weeks ago he was in Syracuse without NHL hockey on the immediate horizon; a trade and a whirlwind later, he's doing this.
- Tavares' goals: One tapping in from his "office," the other an empty-netter to cap his night. Assists included the Meyer redirect and a great no-look pass to "Coulson" at the goalmouth. How thrilled did he look to be churning points tonight?
- Nine-Teen Eighty-Two {clap clap, clap-clap-clap}
Big Picture: Great Start, Smart Finish
All individual ravings aside: As the Islanders sometimes do, they appeared to take by surprise a team that doesn't see them often. I'm not going to reference the local columnists who are always trolling for clicks and outrage, but obviously the Isles -- with their regular assortment of injuries as well as no Okposo -- came to play.
It was not the Canucks' night, but the key was that the Isles took advantage, jumping to a 3-0 lead and then answering right back when the Canucks had pulled it to 3-2. (Seventeen seconds after Alex Burrows pulled the Canucks within one, Tavares charged down the right wing boards, made a power move and banked the puck off a net-crashing Freddy Meyer to regain the insurance goal with just eight seconds left in the 2nd period. Pivotal moment of the night, that.)
There was plenty more to praise, I'm sure, much of it brought up by everyone in the game thread. (And here I was expecting a quieter one with the late start.)
* * *
Where do we go from here? Well, WebBard's positivity aside, the playoffs remain an impossibility (barring a miraculous undefeated run and/or apocalyptic collapse by at least four teams). But with a three-game win streak including two wins over good teams, any cohesive, gutsy performance like tonight in the remaining 12 games will be cause for thinking, yet again, that this franchise is headed in the right direction. I'll take it.
0 recs |
64 comments
|
Comments
Hey hey, although 15-0-0 might be a bit much (I do like the 98% chance of us getting in if we manage it) we aren’t facing world beaters down the stretch. Ducks, Kings, Rangers 2x, Flames, Bluejackets, Flyers (We’re due a win damit!) Sens and Canadians.
Of course the last three games are against the Pens with the Devils sandwiched between team.
Everytime I think it’s over, they pull me back in.
I believe in 15-0-0, Lets do these Playoffs!
Everytime I think it’s over, they pull me back in.
Ah-haha, too true. Those opponents at the end are scary, but this time of year always gets hard to figure (Will the Devils or Pens be resting that final weekend? Or still battling for 1st?)
Tonight the Isles’ chances according to Sports Club Stats increased by .6 percent … to 1%. (I wonder what the chances were before the 4-game Dubie run in 2007.)
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
The Mississauga Mudflap
Man I love Moulson. Willing to crash the net, garbage collect, but still has the talent to make it happen in the open. Isles really needed a guy like that and they got him out of nowhere. As for JT, how about that shoulder fake coming off the boards on the first goal…I am telling you shades of Pierre Turgeon.
“The Mississauga Mudflap” – nice.
With Tavares/Turgeon — I can see that, the shoulder fake for sure. If JT fills out and gets anywhere near the leg strength Turgeon had, look out.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
every team but the jackets has a better record than we do
and every team but the jackets is either in or competing for a playoff spot. The Canadiens may be the hottest team in the NHL right now.If we go 6-6 and finish with 79 points, that will be a lot/
jt
finally,i get to see what all the hype is about! ive noticed him playing better defensively and learning to use his body more,lately. but the energy he brought tonight was special. he clearly looked like the best player on the ice,with no disrespect intended to Henrik the Twin(well, ….maybe just a little)
by Lakewood Islander on Mar 17, 2010 2:54 AM EDT reply actions
That first-period diving shot block tonight was a nice touch.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
damn right it was, i was watching and immediately hit the skip back button thinking “was that fn JT blocking a shot in the slot?” – then i smiled as the replay confirmed it
the goal at the end of the 2nd period was nice, but the Reese goal was the one that stands out to me, but maybe i just like seeing A- nice playmaking B- 1st NHL goals, and then C- a character guy (moulson) joyfully snatching up the puck to commemorate the event
NY Islanders Hockey: Where MRI's are addictive
Ha, I replayed the JT block, too. It was funny, I didn’t realize that it was him and he got up and I recognized the way he held his stick along the boards.
Loved all of the above on that Reese goal. And the fact I thought he had no options and was in trouble until he tightened up on his stick and just flipped that shot against the grain. It doesn’t take a cannon when a simple traffic jam will do.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
30
Hey, Matt Isbister . . . err, Coulson, may score 30 goals this year. Not bad.
*Puts on Madden voice*
“I tell you what, Marques Coulson just makes good hockey plays.”
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
Here is a thought: does Moulson qualify as a rookie? Because if he did, he’d be leading in goals and only a few points off the point lead as well.
He unfortunately doesn’t. He played in too many games for LA over the last couple of seasons to qualify.
We're doomed. Doomed!
by David Hanssen on Mar 17, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions
And my, how it shows. His body and the way he handles himself around the net and on the boards screams of someone who’s played against men for a while.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
sadly no
He played too many games in his cups of coffee with the Kings. You can’t play more than six each in two separate seasons, or twenty in any one prior season (I think). Then you also have the Sergei Makarov Rule – nobody older than 26 is eligible – but he hasn’t turned 27 yet so I think he’s valid there.
Of course I'm an expert, I've seen Slap Shot eleven times!
In fairness
That race is rigged: He gets help from Franz.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
Kesler and Samuelson’s I think
We're doomed. Doomed!
by David Hanssen on Mar 17, 2010 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions
So, since we are bing so positive, does Tambi stay in the lineup if Rokposo can’t come back for the next game? That really does have a nice ring to it.
Dear Islanders:
WebBard wants me to be more positive about your chances of getting into the playoffs...soooo....please don't make me yell WHY again at the end of the season. I BEG YOU!
Good question
Gillies had all of three shifts, and Tambellini actually saw an extended PP shift. But I bet his TOI gets even smaller when you put Rokposo back in.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
Although like every night, he was the best Dane on the ice
Well, he actually had some stiff competition last night in Jannik Hansen. And this is what it feels like to have two 20 goal scorers… Weird.
We're doomed. Doomed!
For sure — my reference to Hansen was maybe too veiled. But Frans still holds the title (for now).
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
Until the next time we play Ottawa maybe?
We're doomed. Doomed!
by David Hanssen on Mar 17, 2010 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Nej! (I think that’s Danish, anyway.)
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
Interesting obscure fact, two of the three Danes in the NHL (Frans and Peter Regin) both come from Herning, a town of less than 50,000 people.
We're doomed. Doomed!
by David Hanssen on Mar 17, 2010 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions
I think a nice late sleeper pick in the draft would be fellow Herning native Patrick Bjorkstrand. Put up good numbers for the Denmark U-20 team at the WJC D-1 as the youngest player on the team. He reminds me a bit of Frans when he was drafted, raw but with some seasoning could be something special. His father is actually American, played for Maine and in the IHL before playing most of his career in Denmark.
We're doomed. Doomed!
by David Hanssen on Mar 17, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
While I'm on Obscure Scandinavian Prospects
A guy I hope the Isles get with a late round pick: Sondre Olden playing for MoDo’s U-20 team. Big Norwegian winger (6’4"/175), tons of potential, needs to fill out his frame. But if he does, oh man he could be a force. We wouldn’t see him state-side for 3-4 years after the draft but I think he would be a good low risk-high reward type of player to pick up in the 5th-7th round.
We're doomed. Doomed!
by David Hanssen on Mar 17, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions
I was just dreaming of size yesterday
…and how hard is to get in the form you know has talent, too. Seems like that profile is the good kind of low risk to take.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
Yeah, guys that size just don’t grow on trees. I would think his time table would be similar to Neilsen in coming state side, 4 years in the Elitserien plus some AHL seasoning before he would make an impact.
We're doomed. Doomed!
by David Hanssen on Mar 17, 2010 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
AHL 5, Canucks 2
Vancouver media, Bobby Lou hardest hit.
Of course I'm an expert, I've seen Slap Shot eleven times!
No doubt
How can that team have Cup aspirations when their starter gets knocked out by a team of AHL and ECHLers?
/columnist
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
No, Bobby...
… I’m sure they were "LOOOUUUUUUUUU"ing you.
Of course I'm an expert, I've seen Slap Shot eleven times!
In all fairness he did win a gold medal and if Team USA would have had the same amount of firepower on it that the Islanders have they probably would have chased him from net in the olympics as well.
Dear Islanders:
WebBard wants me to be more positive about your chances of getting into the playoffs...soooo....please don't make me yell WHY again at the end of the season. I BEG YOU!
by metalcoconut on Mar 17, 2010 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions
True. I knew we should have found a way to fudge over JT’s nationality to bootstrap him to the U.S. squad.
Tim Jackman’s omission from the squad is a black mark on Burke’s career.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
here we go again
once again, we put on a late season win streak when the playoffs are out of reach, and it pushes us further away from the 1st overall pick. how many times do we have to pile up meaningless wins late in a poor season, only to then draft one or two positions further away from the top?
they could very easily bench a few regulars each game, call up some young players to “see what they have”, and rack up the losses. finishing 17th overall (or even 25th) is no better than finishing 28th or 30th.
don't think you'll have to worry about this team piling up wins
unless JT is gonna get 5 points every night that is.
Real teams dont do what you suggest, they play to win as much as possible. YOU might not think there is any benefit to finishing a season at NHL-500 or above but they certainly do. Thankfully, professional players that are worth anything at all dont think like you.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 18, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
It's about character
I think it would be more detrimental to the team to not try to win games now, than it would be beneficial to have a draft spot a few seeds higher. The foundation of this rebuild has to always want to win and more importantly hate to loose. That’s the type of team we’re building here.
The foundation of this rebuild has to always want to win and more importantly hate to loose. That’s the type of team we’re building here.
You said it, mdelbags! :)
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 18, 2010 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions
how many times do we have to pile up meaningless wins late in a poor season,
I guess as long as pro players play hockey with any sense of pride and professionalism?
And of course they’re already a few regulars short, Dylan Reese and Dustin Kohn make up a third of the defense, the AHL team is fighting for the playoffs, the 1st lottery position has long been out of reach, and the future career of this summer’s 4th overall selection vs. the 7th or 8th pick is a coin flip…
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
and anyway
unless the team suddenly becomes a different team—and JT does start scoring 5 a night consistently—it is unlikely that they will suddenly reel off 10 of the next 12—which they would need to do to have a realistic chance of making the playoffs. Best case: they win 6 of the remaining 12 and finish with 79 points. More likely 75 or 76 and that should give them a shot at Seguin. The real question is not whether players should go all out to win. Of course, they should. The real question is whether Garth and Scott start scratching players with various ailments to protect them.
The real question is whether Garth and Scott start scratching players with various ailments to protect them.
You’re not suggesting they dropped a ski-lift ticket in Okposo’s locker in Vancouver along with some brochures about the best beaches in Southern California, are you? Surely not. ;)
In all seriousness, from here on out they’ll win a few, they’ll lose a few more than that, and their lottery position will depend on the bounces and breaks of several other teams who do the same. Just play the games out and see where the chips fall, because sometimes you beat Vancouver, and sometimes you lose to Atlanta. (But no one — NO ONE — apparently loses to Edmonton.)
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
actually they did beat the Devs & Minn in the last 10
If (when) they draft Hall, Paajarvi-Svennson will actually be third at LW on their system depth chart. We should finish with between 75 and 80 points and a top five pick. The bottom of that range might even be less than Toronto and give us pole position for #2 and an outside shot at #1.
Im still sticking with the idea that the Isles have a pretty good chance not to pick in the first 5.
Im betting between 4th and 6th.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 18, 2010 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions
agree with ya chick, but this team is so bipolar i can’t rule out winning 2 of the last 12, or going 8-2-1 in the last 12…
NY Islanders Hockey: Where MRI's are addictive
at best, they will win 6 of 12
I doubt that gets them out of the top five. They have been shifting between three and four mostly ever since their January run fell apart. Unless JT continues to get 5 points a game, there is no reason to think that they will do anything else now.
you guys are missing the point – we win 3 in a row, and move from 3rd (worst) to 6th – outside of lottery move-up-to-first range. our percentage of winning the lottery also drops from 14.2% @ 3rd to 6.2% @ 6th.
we win a meaningless late season game or two and end up with Scott LaChance vs. Scott Niedermeyer. or Scott Scissions vs. Jaromir Jagr, or a bunch of other shit picks i dont feel like listing. yes, i know that picking the right player with the pick you have is as equally important, but knowing you will have a possible all-star top-5 pick coming next year in exchange for a few meaningless wins seems to be a no-brainer to me.
relax...breathe deeply
Carolina won last night, Columbus just won today so right now we are back at 4th. If we lose tonight and tomorrow and Carolina wins tomorrow, we will be back in third. If Toronto also wins tomorrow, they will be only three points behind us. I want the guys to give it all they can, but unless they suddenly become a whole new team overnight, they are unlikely to finish out of the top five in picks. My guess is that they will finish thid overall. If Toronto goes on a real hot streak, they might even finish with the second and a not unreasonable shot at the #1 overall.
Not losing on purpose seems like a no-brainer to me.
It’s fun to bandy about in the abstract, but to actually expect a team to do it is folly. And, as we just saw, you can take out one of your best players and still beat Vancouver 5-2 in this league. Gaming the system only works for the Penguins.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
The wins are not “meaningless” to the players who are playing in the game. The players do not give a shit about draft pick position… nor should they.
The Isles are 3-0-2 in their last 5 GP. I just dont see them suddenly not winning at all.
BTW- as far as your “shit pick” examples go, I would like you to remember where kids like Kyle and Bailey were drafted- or for that matter, a player like Streit. People need to get this idea that the the 5th pick is the 5th best player, the 12th pick is the 12th best player, 24th pick is the 24th best player, the 83rd pick is the 83rd best player, because it simply does NOT pan out that way in reality.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 20, 2010 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions
(forget, not get)
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 20, 2010 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions
if it “worked” for the penguins, why can’t it work for us?
i’m not talking about asking players to tank it – that is frowned upon by the league. what i am saying is you bench a few of your players to give them “a night off” or some other nonsense and play your scrubs from the minors to “see what they have” when you know you wont even be bringing them back. you’re right – players don’t care about draft position. the people who SHOULD care about draft position should be Snow and the scouts, since that is what they need to plan around for the offseason. this season is over as far as playoffs go for us – why try to finish 11th?
and i get that you find good players throughout the draft. Luc Robitaille is proof of that. I would still rather have the 3rd pick than the 6th. you have a better chance of winning the lottery & getting #1, and you also have a better chance of trading it to get a player(s) and/or pick(s) with a higher pick. for the most part, and i re-emphasize MOST part, the top 5 picks usually end up being solid performers throughout their careers, if not all stars. considering that is what we can “win”, i’d rather go for that.

by 





























