3.5 Years In: Garth Snow's team taking shape
Hardly a day goes by when Islanders fans don't think of the team in the context of the word "rebuild" -- even if that's not a word GM Garth Snow likes to use.
But that's what's happening for the past two seasons, and a comparison of the roster constructed by Snow for 2007-08 to the one we see at the tail end of 2009-10 gives us a glimpse of how Snow course-corrected in early 2008 and put his stamp on the team.
The 2007-08 roster is a good comparison not just because it was the first season for which Snow had a full summer to tinker (Neil Smith signed several of the 2006 free agents), but also because it was the final season before Snow concluded -- and convinced Charles Wang -- that the franchise needed to pull back to scratch rather than continue grabbing stopgap free agents whose collective ceiling was yet another one-and-done 8th playoff seed.
Through the draft and a few select free agency signings, Snow is building a new core for the Islanders. With more pending free agents likely to exit and another draft (with a pick possibly high enough to help in 2010-11), this summer should bring about the moment where Snow can say, "This, this is the team I've been working on."
2007-08 Roster: The Post-Smyth Push, or Mediocrity's Last Stand
When Snow famously flipped some inherited assets he found expendable for a run at the playoffs with Ryan Smyth, it was with the idea of coaxing (and extending) Smyth to fall in love with a second Blue and Orange franchise whose heyday came when only Mr. T could be B.A. Baracus. That flirtation wasn't enough to woo Smyth, however, so Snow reverted to a Plan B with second-choice free agents like Bill Guerin -- immediately named captain to replace the bought-out Alexei Yashin -- and Ruslan Fedotenko.
But Smyth's rejection, the Islanders' bare prospect cupboard, and the realization that stopgaps like Mike Comrie as #1 center isn't going to get it done, helped Snow swallow the hard pill the Islanders should have swallowed years ago: A proper rebuild.
The main components of the 2007-08 roster are a good picture of that moment of transition. Virtually all of the free agents Snow added were stopgaps now departed, while the inherited pieces he's hung on to are either cheap, impossible to trade, or part of the core going forward:
| Inherited | Acquired | Outcome/Status |
|---|---|---|
| Miro Satan | Inherited (FA) | Walk |
| Trent Hunter | Inherited (trade) | Signed 12-13 |
| Mike Sillinger | Inherited (FA) | Retired (injury) |
| Sean Bergenheim | Inherited (draft) | pending RFA |
| Andy Hilbert | Inherited (FA) | Walk |
| Blake Comeau | Inherited (draft) | Signed 10-11 |
| Jeff Tambellini | Inherited (trade) | pending RFA |
| Chris Simon | Inherited (FA) | Trade (6th - DiBenedetto) |
| Shawn Bates | Inherited (trade) | Walk (injury) |
| Radek Martinek | Inherited (draft) | Signed 10-11 |
| DEFENSEMEN | ||
| Chris Campoli | Inherited (draft) | Trade (1st - share of de Haan) |
| Bruno Gervais | Inherited (draft) | Signed 10-11 |
| Brendan Witt | Inherited (FA) | Waived, but signed 10-11 |
| SNOW ADDITIONS | ||
| FORWARDS | ||
| Added | Acquired | Outcome/Status |
| Mike Comrie | FA | Trade (MacAmmond, walk) |
| Bill Guerin | FA | Trade (3rd-flipped) |
| Josef Vasicek | FA | Walk |
| Ruslan Fedotenko | FA | Walk |
| Richard Park | FA | pending UFA |
| Jon Sim | FA | pending UFA |
| DEFENSEMEN |
||
| Andy Sutton | FA | Trade (2nd-2010) |
| Bryan Berard | FA | Walk |
| Marc-Andre Bergeron | Trade (Grebeshkov) | Trade (3rd-Petrov) |
| Freddy Meyer | Trade (Zhitnik) *note: 1-month 2007 PHX waiver sojourn |
pending UFA |
2009-10 Down the Stretch: The Transition is Here
Fast-forward two years and two drafts, with a new groom 'em young coach and two [edit] three top-10 picks in the lineup, and you have a different picture.
Obviously as a GM's tenure gets longer, he's going to have fewer inherited players than when he started. But today Snow doesn't even have much of what he gave himself that first full summer: Just two depth players (Park and Sim) remain from the free agents he himself signed before the transition, and the only inherited players he still has were either existing young prospects or two long-tenured Isles (and formerly Snow's teammates) who Snow signed to long extensions to be a lasting part of the core (Hunter and Martinek).
The rest are Snow's brand: His picks (Bailey, Tavares, Martin), his free agents (Streit, Hillen). This is truly shaping into his team now, and this summer's picks and free agents will all but complete the transition to Snow's Team -- though obviously not complete the "rebuild." [Edit: Obviously Asst. GM and Director of Amateur Scouting Ryan Jankowski is a HUGE part of this equation. That's implied when I refer to Snow's regime, but probably shouldn't be left out.]
| Inherited | Acquired | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Kyle Okposo | Inherited (draft) | Signed 10-11 |
| Frans Nielsen | Inherited (draft) | Signed 11-12 |
| Blake Comeau | Inherited (draft) | Signed 10-11 |
| Trent Hunter | Inherited (trade) | Signed 12-13 |
| Sean Bergenheim | Inherited (draft) | pending RFA |
| Jeff Tambellini | Inherited (trade) | pending RFA |
| DEFENSEMEN | ||
| Bruno Gervais | Inherited (draft) | Signed 10-11 |
| Andrew MacDonald | Inherited (draft) | Signed 13-14 |
| Dustin Kohn | Inherited (draft) | pending RFA |
| Radek Martinek | Inherited (draft) | Signed 10-11 |
| SNOW ADDITIONS |
||
| FORWARDS | ||
| Acquired | Status | |
| Matt Moulson | FA | pending RFA |
| John Tavares | Drafted 09 | Signed 11-12 |
| Josh Bailey | Drafted 08 | Signed 10-11 |
| Richard Park | FA | pending UFA |
| Rob Schremp | Waiver claim | pending RFA |
| Doug Weight | FA | pending UFA |
| Jon Sim | FA | pending UFA |
| Tim Jackman | FA | pending UFA |
| Matt Martin | Drafted 08 | Signed 11-12 |
| DEFENSEMEN | ||
| Mark Streit | FA | Signed 12-13 |
| Jack Hillen | FA | Signed 10-11 |
| Freddy Meyer | Trade (Zhitnik) *note: 1-month 2007 PHX waiver sojourn |
pending UFA |
| Dylan Reese | Trade (Moore) | pending RFA |
There is one position I've left out of this, but that's because it's a whole different animal. With Dwayne Roloson signed through next season and Rick DiPietro's health an open question, that's a topic for another day.
As for the other positions, many of us have our complaints in terms of the team's construction for games this season (e.g. "Why was the blueline left untouched last summer? What of an added scoring winger for this year?"). But for the bigger long-term picture, it's clear Snow has been sticking steadfast to the plan he shifted to at the end of 2007-08: Develop the prospects who were here (Okposo, Nielsen), add or identify/extend internal pieces for the core (Streit, Nielsen), draft character players (Bailey, Martin), and start to lock up core pieces as they emerge (Nielsen ... MacDonald?). [Edit: Did I really just list Nielsen in all three categories? You bet I did. I reserve this space as 100% pure Danish kool-aid zone.]
This summer will be interesting not just for the draft and the free agents added (two defensemen have been promised), but also for how Snow handles contracts for guys like Moulson and Schremp, who last summer were not in the picture, yet now appear to be Snow's biggest steals of the year. In the past, he's extended Nielsen, Hunter, Martinek and MacDonald to longer term in exchange for lower salary. Will that trend continue? Will he add size via free agency?
Occasionally I profess that the first stage of a rebuild is easy: Aside from the discipline required and a thick skin for the ridicule you take through your team's growing pains, tearing a rotten foundation down is a no-brainer really. It's the second stage that's really challenging: Making make-or-break decisions with actual players who might not pan out or, if you're cutting them, might actually prove you wrong at their next stop. That's the stage that's now coming into view.
Similarly, I always say the hard questions about Snow's performance will start to come after this summer. Again, we can quibble about the roster construction the last two seasons, but it was never a secret that stocking a contender through free agency wasn't in the cards, so we were quibbling over the scraps of a young, underdeveloped and understocked team.
Now, however, playoffs for next season is the stated goal. There are real openings that free agency can fill. There is a core of young kids emerging who need supplementing. The question at the next few trade deadlines will be what Snow did to get the Isles into the playoffs, or deeper, rather than what did he do to salvage value for expiring assets.
Soon, the real fun starts.
67 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
So here's my new strategy for this leg of the rebuild
Tank for Tyler. He’s being compared to Yzerman and Jimmy D put Trots second to Stevaroonie on his list of centers that he has drafted. Then you figure on Chicago having an early flameout in the draft with their shaky goaltending and now Campbell gone for the duration. Windy City fans will be screaming for a change in net and the Bowmans will bite the bullet, send Huet here with their first and the second from Calgary for Sean Bergenheim. This frees them to send Versteeg and their other second to Florida for Vokoun. We use the Chicago first with a slight tradeup to get Dylan McIlrath who, at 6’2", 215, is a bigger and as bad version of Witter when he was young with some offensive upside to boot. Use our remaining picks to get a quality PF and a defenseman. And then get the best veteran defenseman we can in the draft.
With Seguin, JT, and Kyle on the top line and Moulson, Josh, and Blake on the second line (maybe adding Petrov and demoting Comeau later in the season, we should have more than enough offense. With Roly and Huet in net, we can let Mikko and the others develop naturally and let the DP thing play itself out with no worries. And resigning Kohn and Reese as well as adding a veteran should make our D solid enough that we do not need to rush any of our defensive prospects either.
And that is a team that should be a genuine playoff contender next year AND be well poised to contend for the Cup in a few years.
I still argue that we don’t particularly need to tank for a player. Sure, the higher the pick the better, but I have trust in who Garth picks. He’s been surprisingly good with higher first round picks.
The Lemieux Curse lives on, will the Islanders reach 2013?
I was somewhat kidding
don’t think they need to tank actually. 12 of our remaining 13 games are against teams that are either in the playoffs currently or are desperately competing for playoff spots. The one exception will be the Jackets who will be in one of their last home games and will want to impress the crowd. We will be fortunate to get a point a game and that won’t even get us to 80 points. I think that we will be handily in the third spot and will likely pick third. The Oil could trade their #1 as they are deep at center, LW, and D. Likely though, they will pick Hall. Boston NEEDS an elite defender as they do not really have one in the system and Chara’s deal is up next year. On the other hand, they are quite deep at center. So they will likely pick either Fowler, Gudbranson, or Gormley.
the one caveat with Boston is Savard's status
still think they will go D with their top pick though.
The march ISS rankings have Seguin first, Hall second, Fowler third, Tarasenko fourth and Gormley fifth. I hope you are right about Boston taking a D-man because I would be happy with either Hall or Seguin. At this point I’m leaning a little more towards Seguin and agree with you that switching JT to wing could work out. What I like about Hall is that he played with Bailey and according to an an article written by Chris Pope from The Good Point he has “cited New York Islanders forward and 2009 NHL Entry Draft first overall pick, John Tavares, as a role model, both on and off the ice.” When all is said and done I wouldn’t be too dissapointed with Fowler or Gormley either, as we could certainly use the held on D. I see Tarasenko and Kabanov as more boom or bust type picks and would feel safer if Garth took a North American, although Nino is certainly an intriguing prospect.
Oil will pick Hall
unless we get some major lottery love. No guarantee that Boston won’t pick Seguin. I suspect that they would love to have a shot at Hall. But they really need an elite defenseman. The thing about Seguin, Nino, and McIlrath is that they have all come on like gangbusters to make likely first round or, for Seguin and Nino, early first round picks. Not worried about picking North American, especially since Nino has been quite good in Portland and Kabanov has been good when he has been healthy for Moncton.
I just wanna say
It’s really not healthy for me to imagine these scenarios, because I get all dreamy and lose consciousness for several minutes.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
I respectfully disagree
The idea that Garth Snow has the team heading in the right direction surprises me. I’ve seen this team play. Seems to me that everyone here wants them to improve so much that each time they put a couple of wins together we think the Stanley Cup is within reach. It isn’t. The problem is we are not a major league operation. From our arena to our GM to our scouts to our coaching staff right down to our players we are MINOR LEAGUE. Heck, just look at our radio broadcast. A disgrace. I’ve been around since the ‘72 beginning and I’ve never been so down on our future. I know many of you want to believe in our "direction" but I’m sorry…I don’t see it. I’m depressed.
don't just want to believe
I believe because Garth is picking quality people in the draft and FA. Lots of olks missed Mark Streit and Matt Moulson and they are now genuine star quality players. Lots of folks passed on Anders Lee and Casey Cizikas and they are already demonstrating that they are stars in the making as are De Haan and Hamonic. And lets not forget about Rob Schremp hockey. Schremp was allowed to walk and we picked up an everyday player for NOTHING. And all tis is after just two years of rebuild. It takes time to build a champion. I never really expected that they would compete this year, but they have shown impressive flashes. With the addition of Seguin and a quality FA defenseman and, hopefully, resolution of the Lighthouse nightmare, we should be fine.
Lots of folks passed on Anders Lee and Casey Cizikas and they are already demonstrating that they are stars in the making
“Stars in the making” is a bit of a reach, but they were nice late picks, to be sure.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
I’ve seen this team play. Even with all their struggles and bad stats, the reason to be up on them is because of how close they are. Seemingly every talking head predicted us to easily be one of the worst teams in the league. Even with a poor PP, a Poor PK and a 5n5 ratio that’s not setting the world on fire, the team managed to stay within striking of the 8th seed till the latest losing streak.
These Islanders aren’t going out and getting blown out of the game every night. They are usually out matched, but they fight claw and scratch their way to keep in games. It’s a different energy of the team. When a team’s in the shitter you know it. They go out and you can tell from the body motions and the trying and see its just not there.
This is an Islanders team that goes out and fights nearly every night. Sure, they tend to lose games when leading going into the third, but they are young. They are going to eventually gain that edge and confidence and go into the 3rd with 2 goal leads and come out with wins. I think its really all right there close to the surface.
Can I just say that when I think of an Isles team that had no direction and was just depressing to watch it was the 00-01 team with Beezer in net, Wang had allowed Milbury to sign a bunch of FAs and he of course brought in a bunch of garbage over the Hill UFAs and proceeded to tell the fans that it was a playoff team that year or his head.
The Lemieux Curse lives on, will the Islanders reach 2013?
to me the most depressing time was in the late 90s before Wang bought the team
and Palffy and others were being shipped out in deals so bad that even Bettman had to intervene.
To me the Linden deal and firing of Bowness is what really soured my belief in Milbury. The trade of Luongo just killed it.
The Lemieux Curse lives on, will the Islanders reach 2013?
Wang and Mad Mike made lots of boners
but at least they weren’t conciously trying to destroy the team…it just seemed as if they were!!!
Mad Mike was the blame
Wang doesnt know hockey, especially back when he bought the team, and Milbury was horrible. Luongo was bad, Palffy was worse
by Rickfansince76 on Apr 9, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
to me the most depressing time was in the late 90s before Wang bought the team
So totally agree. No matter my complaints about Wang’s decisions over the last 10 years, it’s never felt as bad as that period.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
I agree with this
based on the few times I’ve really gotten to watch full games this year & all the many highlight films I’ve watched, I’ve really liked what I’ve seen from this team. They’re so much more impressive than the middling teams of the past few years – not because they are particularly better right now, which they’re not, but because you can see the potential for them to actually become a winning team. They’re a few pieces away and they need some more experience, but they seem to be heading in the right direction for the first time since I became a fan in the early ’90s.
2009 Did Not Happen
72 beginning and I’ve never been so down on our future. I know many of you want to believe in our “direction” but I’m sorry…I don’t see it.
I just find that so strange. Now that the Isles are finally building something long term, and we are even seeing real signs of it in only year two, NOW you are mad? I know you are not along in feeling this way, but I will never totally understand it.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 15, 2010 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I know many of you want to believe in our “direction” but I’m sorry…I don’t see it. I’m depressed.
I’m sorry to hear that … but we’re here to help. :P
our GM to our scouts to our coaching staff right down to our players we are MINOR LEAGUE.I don’t feel that way, obviously. I certainly see the team operating on a shoestring in many respects (and given their revenues and the money already lost this decade, well it’s hard for me to begrudge that too much). But the GM and scouts sure don’t strike me as minor league. They’ve produced some nice finds the last couple of drafts, and I think Snow’s current approach is (1) a decade overdue, and (2) the only way up for a club in this uncertain position.
…Time will tell, though. (But the timing of this post after two wins is pure coincidence. I wanted to compare pre-rebuild and mid-rebuild rosters ever since the deadline, but only just got around to it.)
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
I certainly see the team operating on a shoestring in many respects (and given their revenues and the money already lost this decade, well it’s hard for me to begrudge that too much). But the GM and scouts sure don’t strike me as minor league. They’ve produced some nice finds the last couple of drafts, and I think Snow’s current approach is (1) a decade overdue, and (2) the only way up for a club in this uncertain position.
Im with you, Dom- completely.
In my opinion, there are Isles fans who are so used to feeling the way this guy feels that they are going to feel that way regardless of what the GM does unless the team magically became immediate contenders. And personally, I think they would still be upset.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 16, 2010 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions
agreed dom… also the coaching and scouting has been complimented league-wide ("the isles have an unprecedented 7 players representing them in the WJC’s this year) one announcer chimed, while having a coach serve as asst on the olympic team, and capuano has the bridge in playoff position (and that team is pretty, ah, undertalented? considering our top scorer is #65 in the league in scoring and the team is a -20 in goal differntial)
NY Islanders Hockey: Where MRI's are addictive
I agree, a decade overdue
if you arent going to sign big names for big $$$ you have to draft and develope. and even if you pay for FA, you need cheap talent around, drafted talent to win a cup.
by Rickfansince76 on Apr 9, 2010 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions
A few years back people were saying the same thing about Pittsburgh, Chicago. Those teams did the smart thing and built there teams through the draft. That is what I see the Islanders trying to do and so far I’m encouraged. Of course impatient fans want to see success right away and if Garth wanted to he could get a pretty good return on the likes of Tavares, Bailey, Okposo et al and put together a team that could grab an 8th or 7th seed and lose in the first round, like Milbury did time and time again. We’ll never see any real success in the playoffs but it would satiate impatient fans like you for a while. I’d rather see this team try to build something for real. How did Trottier, Bossey, Gillies and Potvin become Islanders? Free Agency? Trades? No, they were drafted and those early seventies Islander teams experienced plenty of growing pains while those guys matured. Plenty of fans then wanted to see the team win right away but the management was patient and it paid off in spades. We’ve some pretty promising signs things from Bailey, Okposo and Tavares (and plenty of growing pains as well) and we’ll have a pretty nice position this year for what looks like a great draft class. I’m not saying for sure that we have the next Trottier, Bossy or Gillies; maybe someone like Hall or Seguin will prove to be the star we can build a team around, or maybe JT will prove to be that guy…or maybe not, but we have to be patient and see this thing through. Or we can trade these guys and our first overall pick this year for the 2010 equivalent of Alexi Yashin, slip into the playoffs next year to get swept. I’ll take the first option and wait patiently to see we can build a winning team the right way.
by MatthewM11 on Mar 16, 2010 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
wait patiently to see
that’s the key. Everyone should do themselves a favor and order Jimmy D’s The Road to Hockeytown through BN or Amazon. Of course, he was fortunate in having the Ilitches as owners, but nonetheless it is true.
Patience indeed
On that note, we should keep in mind that: 1) Pittsburgh got really, really lucky in terms of the lottery, a generational star (and if you want to go there, their venue being sorted), and 2) Chicago was bad for quite a while. Chicago even had the benefit of adding some pricey free agents to their choice draft picks, but they stumbled and stalled through much of the past decade. Point being this should be a long process, and if the Islanders are talking playoffs this time next year we’re doing better than is typical.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
thing is
with just reasonable improvements in the play of JT, Josh, and Kyle and the draft of Seguin as well as a good veteran defenseman—all of which are reasonable expectations, the playoffs next year is not really a stretch.
thing is
with just reasonable improvements in the play of JT, Josh, and Kyle and the draft of Seguin as well as a good veteran defenseman—all of which are reasonable expectations, the playoffs next year is not really a stretch.
I totally agree, BC.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 16, 2010 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions
how can it be wrong when we improved 16 points over last season, I respectively disagee with Mickey
we have scored more goals and given up less..it is 1 step in the right direction, the next step is to make the playoffs, the 3rd step to advance and the final to win the Cup. The Isanders of the early 80s didnt win the 1st year we started to draft them. we gathered players, and became a winner.
remember this team is young and playing well enough to be an 8th seed, Bailey and Taveras will gain man strenghth as Snow calls it, and become better. Schremp and Moulson must be resigned as they fit well.
If we can get out of the Depietro thing we become a winner, whether it is he is finally healthy and playing 50+ games, or we cut ties and bring up someone else
Minor League- I dont think so, what are you a Rangers fan
by Rickfansince76 on Apr 9, 2010 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions
My prediction for year Three
I would agree with much of what you stated but, I think the team is still a year away from making major decisions and a push for the playoffs. I hope the wins this weekend don’t cost them at the draft. If Boston picks second I think they would take Seguin. They need scoring. Hopefully Florida and Columbus can win a few. I agree the Islanders need to get Seguin. He would fit perfectly with this team. He’s a right handed shot like Kyle and JT and Josh are lefties.
I don’t see Petrov playing in the NHL next year unless he first comes over and plays great in Bridgeport first. He will need at least 20-30 games in the AHL before I would think of putting him in the NHL. He hasn’t played much at all anywhere this year.
As far as this summer and the FAs. I think Snow realized that his drafted Dman (de Haan, Hamonic., Donovan etc..) are still a few years away and the on-ice team needs some help now to go with Streit, Hillen, MacDoanld, a health Martinek; Gervais with Kohn and maybe Meyer as back-ups. Hopefully he doesn’t sign anyone to a long term deal. I would think one solid stay at home D-man to a two year deal would be enough.
The forwards for next year will be the young core plus maybe one FA (I like John Madden). But that won’t happen. I don’t think Snow will do much up front. He may bring Park back and give Weight a training camp invite.
Next years team will be fun, better than the 2009-10 version but probable won’t make the playoff. Although I think they will be in the mix much longer and maybe even into April.
I still don’t think they’ll have enough offense or depth. The kids are still too young. A few injuries and 2010-11 could be another long year. Next years trade deadline will be the tough time for Snow. Should he make a trade to go for the playoff? Or stay patient and stand pat?
Next years trade bait: Bergenhiem, Hunter, Gervais, Roloson
Next years questions: How much will Tavares improve? How many NHL games will Martin, Joensuu, Kohn, Hamonic, Rkahshani and DP play in?
If Boston did pick Seguin
it is unlikely with their depth at center that he would play right away. Given that they are so deep there, given that they lack an elite quality D prospect, and given that Chara may walk next year, it is more likely that they will pick a defenseman. If Bergy is traded, it will be this year as he becomes an RFA this summer. Unlikely they will trade Hunts until they have a sutable replacement. As long as Petrov is not on the roster, Hunts will stay. Someone has to want Gervais before he can be traded. Trading Roly depends on DP, our goalie prospects, and any possible FA goalie signings. Before you get too attached to Madden, better look at comments about him at our Second City counterpart site.
I think the team is still a year away from making major decisions and a push for the playoffs.
I actually agree with that, though I like the prospect that, as you say, next year should be fun and closer.
I should clarify I wouldn’t want Snow to spring into “Buy! Buy! Buy!” mode next March if the playoffs are within reach — but I will be pleased if they’ve progressed enough that it enters the conversation.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
Excellent post. But wasn’t Freddy Meyer picked up on re-entry waivers? Yes, he was acquired for Zhitnik originally, but he was waived, picked up by Phoenix, waived by them and re-picked up by the Islanders.
Sorry guys
I should have noted that when I listed it that way. Since it was a “We don’t want to lose him but we don’t have room for him” + Phoenix’s “We’ll take him! Oh wait, we don’t have room for him either” scenario within a short span, I just categorized it under how he was originally acquired. I’ll edit that.
And thanks for the correction — always appreciated.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
Snow Flakes?
Nice post Dom. I agree that the team is in a good position right now, but there are just too many questions for me to put the playoffs in my goals for next year. I think this situation will be clearer in August. For now all we can do is hope that pieces are available, and Snow makes the right moves. Right now this team is not ready. If he does NOTHING this team isn’t ready for maybe three more years.. and then there will be a whole set of new questions. I really feel like he needs to act (not in a huge way, but there needs to be at least two moves made).
RW = KO, Comeau, Hunter, (?), Depth (?)
C= RSH, JT, JB, FN…. DEPTH (?)
LW= Moulson, (?), Bergenhiem, (?), Martin, Joensuu, (?)
D= Streit, Hilen, MacDonald, Marty,(?),(?), Meyer,(?),(?)
PP=(?)… Weight is most likely done, and if he is they will have even more questions about building a consistent PP SYSTEM.
PK=(?)… This is just ugly without size on the backline. The UFA period should help, but this may be a coaching issues as well. The PK was more effective with Sutton and MacDonald, but it wasn’t great even with (a little) size. This question may have to be answered from BEHIND the bench.
As some of those question marks are replaced by real names we can start to have a little more HOPE of being in the mix all the way next year. Hopefully the season starts with guys like Martin, Joensuu and big D making things more interesting.
Jesus would probably turn the other cheek too… but in a league where everybody walks on water I bet you couldn’t get a third rounder for the lord at the deadline.
Size on the blueline you say?
Then make our second pick Mr Size and Snarl himself, Dylan McIlrath—he of the prospects game pummeling video:
I think this situation will be clearer in August.
Agreed, for sure. Always penciled this summer in as pivotal for my impression of how Snow builds a team. I think it may extend past August though, as I could see this club waiting out some depth FAs who overpriced themselves and need a September invite.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
If he does NOTHING this team isn’t ready for maybe three more years.. and then there will be a whole set of new questions. I really feel like he needs to act (not in a huge way, but there needs to be at least two moves made).
Yup, I think so too.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 16, 2010 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions
It's really coming together except for that one thing...the goalie.
I have been a hockey fan all my life and an Isles fan for what feels like longer. I have seen goodtimes and bad and watched the team be built and torn down. The team is moving in the right direction finally by building through the draft and not getting crazy with wacky FA signings. But alas we need to talk about the goalie situation. I really feel that this team will never be able to truly move forward until Dipeitro is either healthy or just let go. That friggin contract is killin us and this wait and see attitude with the “future” of the franchise is almost to hard to watch anymore. I propose they buyout is contract and hangon to Roloson for next season and look to move Biron and find another young goalie to move up. Oh and never again should anybody pick a goalie with the number 1 draft pick!
Sigh. A number of points:
There is no “moving” of Biron- the trade deadline already passed.
It looks like the Isles already ARE “hanging on” to Roloson- he is under contract for another season.
The Isles do not have a pressing need to “find OTHER young goalieS.” IMO you need to look at all the young goalies the Islanders already have.
And there is no “letting go” DiPietro- and “Buying out” Rick DiPietro at this point in time is such a ridiculously bad idea. Any frickin time I see it proposed it makes it tough to read anyhting else in that post with a straight face. In your mind, how in the world does that benefit this team right now???? It doesnt help anything- even a little bit. There is absolutely NO current benefit in doing so. NONE! So you tell me- WTF is “killing them” about Ricks contract right at this time? Could you explain that? The team is at the flippin CAP FLOOR!
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 16, 2010 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Oh and one more thing- regarding your theory about never taking a goalie at #1, olympic gold medalist and defending stanley cup champion MAF says hi.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 16, 2010 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions
DP was an albatross hung around Garth's neck
or at least his contract, which Bettman tried and tried to keep Wang from going through with, is an albatross. it may not be too big a cap problem now, but in a few years when we have to start paying current RFAs, it could be. Also, depending on how seriously you take the anonymous quote, the DP situation seems to be creating issues in the room. If, in fact, neologizer’s sports med buds are correct and DP is done, hopefully he will do the right thing and retire. Of course, it goes without saying that I and many other Isle fans would be delighted if he finally began to perform like the championship goalie he was drafted to be. Maybe watching Luuuuu tonight—if he is watching—will inspire him.
Ther IS no anonymous quote that says the DiPi situation is causing ANY problems in the room. Go back and look at that Newsday article. Really look at it. Look at the two quotes. Its not what you think it is.
You wanna talk years fom now BC, thats a whole different bag. I still dont necessarily agree that it will be a problem, because if the guy cant play he retires and thats that- a buyout would be BEYOND STUPID if that situation is a possibility (and it is.) But any of that is the future, not now. What I said is that it makes zero sense to talk about doing this right now- and I havent seen one speck of anyhting to make me think otherwise.
BTW, aptain Luongo can KISS MY GODDAMN ASS. (Have I mentioned that?)
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 16, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I, for one, never said a word about a buyout
I did look at the quotes and I think it does reflect some concerns in the room. It may not be a big thing now, but I think it could become a big thing going forward. And you say years as if it is an eternity. Kyle, Josh, Blake, Jesse, and Jack are all due for raises at the end of next season and JT the season after that. The thing is, the Isles cannot force DP to retire. He has to decide to do so and I do not think he is going to be anxious to make such a move. And as for your other comment, Luu is too busy admiring his shiny new gold medal in the display case at GM Place just now.
BC, you were responding to what I said to this Zenfoeracer person, and it was regarding buying him out. You joined in the convo where that was already being discussed, so obviously I didnt think you are the one who brought it up. But you did respond to my reaction regarding that idea.
As far as what youre saying- the Newsday quotes do not reflect ANYTHING of the kind- the article however, does. Dont mix up the writing of an intern-supposedly-turned “beat writer” as if it is something that was actually said by and quoted from anybody on that team. There is not one ACTUAL quote there where any player expressed “concerns in the room” in the way that you are saying. If there is, please quote them right here- as-is- WITHOUT the Newsday commentary that fabricates connections between different quotes from different players. Lets look at the quotes themselves, and show me where anyone has said that there is ANY problem in that locker room.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 16, 2010 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions
you clicked reply to my comment
so I assumed it was a response to my comment. My bad.
As to the quote, it would be surprising to me if there were NOT at least some grumbling in the room about DP. Remember all but a handful of these guys never played with DP (apart from a few starts at the beginning of the 2008-09 season) and never knew him as a team leader in the way that he was during Smyth’s brief hiatus. He is coming back to a totally different situation and there is bound to be some tension, especially since he doesn’t appear able to carry his own weight right now and may never be able to do so.
i thought for sure googling "we can rebuild him" + hockey would get me #39
but i found this instead…

NY Islanders Hockey: Where MRI's are addictive
living in DP's shadow
That’s awsome bob!! do you think the puck is going to go past him or is it bouncing away from him after making a save????
it may not be too big a cap problem now, but in a few years when we have to start paying current RFAs, it could be.
I know it seems strange to think this way, but what 4.5M is now is not what 4.5M will be years from now. Somewhere between 5-10 years from now, 4.5M will be what you give a competent player, not a star.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 16, 2010 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions
when you start having to pay a number of star players their money
$4.5 mil in cap space is going to be a fortune. Just ask the Bowmans.
BC, my point is that 4.5M then will not be the same as 4.5M now. Thats the whole reason he got the deal that he did.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 17, 2010 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions
and mine is that it will still be a lot of money against the cap
especially if it is for a player who is either not playing or is sitting on the bench for 3 games out of four. Unless DP returns as a fulltime starter, his cap hit will be an albatross plain and simple.
Disagree.
Even right now, 4.5M is not a lot of money for a full time starter. In a few short years, that will be the kind of money that backup goalies make- not starters! This albatross idea does not work once you factor in economics and salary inflation. For example- if Rick plays a few years from now even as a solid backup, he will be getting paid accordingly.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 17, 2010 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Name for me the other NHL backups who are being paid anything close to $4.5 mil?
and Huet is not a backup. Huet is making about $1 mil more and EVERYONE and their mother thinks it is an awful contract…and he plays everyday or at least is available to play everyday. If anything, as we have discussed ad infinitum on this blog, the value of backups is going down. Biron is good enough to start on some teams and he couldn’t even get $1.5 mil. There is no way that backup salaries will go up that high in the foreseeable future. Only a few elite goalies are getting paid significantly more than him. In fact, Jonas Hiller’s new contract (and DP has NEVER had anything approaching his level of success) gives him the exact same numbers as DP through 2014. Albatross is a good word actually. Right now the Isles have cap room to spare, but they will not all too soon.
$4.5 mil is not a huge amount for a star… but it’s a huge amount when it means paying five different people nearly a million less each. It’s a huge amount when it means two defensemen at $3+ mil per, versus two journeymen. It’s the difference between, say, Nathan Horton and Jordan Staal ($4 mil each) and Robert Nilsson ($2 mil) and Alex Steen ($1.7 mil).
Now if that money is being paid to an All-Star level keeper I don’t mind. When it’s a dead weight, it’s a problem. Even if the cap reaches something like $75 million by the end of his deal (and I don’t think it’s likely), his contract will represent nearly 6.5% of the total… a little more than 1/16 of a 23-man roster.
If he’s on LTIR then his salary doesn’t count, IIRC. The Isles won’t be hosed if he has to retire, but if he just lingers on and lingers on as a shadow of his former self, it’s not good.
I see your point, Metal Chick, though I don’t think that backup keepers will be pulling in that kind of money unless the team really has injury worries about the starter. In general it’s the stars who get the big raises. The NFL cap is humongous and backup quarterbacks don’t make all that much. (Admittedly, the rosters are a lot larger.)
Of course I'm an expert, I've seen Slap Shot eleven times!
Yes, exactly
Hiller took the Ducks on his back and carried them to an upset of the President’s Trophy winners and took the previous year’s Cup winners to a seventh game. He is certainly worth $4.5 mil. Right now DP is not.
Name for me the other NHL backups who are being paid anything close to $4.5 mil?
Huet?
Seriously though, where did I say there were?
What I said is that years from now, 4.5M will not BE what 4.5M is now.
I remember when Ray Bourque took the Bruins to arbitration just to get paid 1M a year. And every other player on the team made less than that because, well, 1M is what you pay a superstar, not a regular player. Its all relative.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 18, 2010 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions
and my point was that, if anything, goalie salaries have trended downward
Nearly 3-1/2 years into his contract, a goalie for a contending team who has already achieved much more than DP has (or is likely to) is being paid exactly the same amount. I can’t think of a single backup who is making half what DP is now and that is healthy backups who are, ya know ready to play. There is NO indication of what you suggest happening in the foreseeable future and LONG before that happens, if it ever does, JT and others are going to be pushing for contracts that will push this team to the cap ceiling. They might be convinced to moderate their demands to keep the core together to compete for the Cup, but that will be a hard sell if we are still paying $4.5 mil for a sometime backup goalie just to keep the dream alive for DP. I would say that if he has not shown himself ready to assume the duties of a starter by this time next year when Roly’s deal ends, it will be time for him to hang it up. If not, then a buyout may have to be considered.
What can I tell you? Bookmark my statement and look at it 5-10 years from now.
What you are arguing against is more a matter of economics than sports… and there is no way for me to “prove” to you on a hockey board that inflation exists or that a particular quantity of money devalues over time.
But I will tell you this beyond the aspects of the economy- a buyout in the immediate future- or in the next couple of years- would not benefit this team in any possible way.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 19, 2010 7:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Of course it will
As I say, talking about economics…long before any change in the cost of a backup goalie occurs—if it ever does, which I doubt—there will be pressure to end this charade that will be irresistable.
Within the next five years—possibly as soon as the end of next season, Mikko and possibly Kevin will be chomping at the bit ready to compete for #1 goalie status.
The one who falls short will certainly not be happy about being sent down to Bridgeport in any event but especially not if he is being sent down in favor of a vastly overpaid backup who cannot play five games with swelling in his knee.
And how about the #1 who will be contributing far more to the team and be getting paid far less? He will certainly not be happy DURING his contract to be making less than 1/4 what DP is. When an extension is discussed, he is certainly going to want to be paid significantly more than DP.
That is going to make it even harder to pay everyone else. And Garth’s fellow GMs will be unhappy with him for driving up the price of goaltenders.
All this will happen UNLESS: (1) DP becomes healthy enough to play as a #1 and plays well enough to be a #1 or (2) DP retires. I suspect that neither will happen and that this will become an issue in the next couple of years.
Did I hit a nerve??
Wow! I am happy to see that my silly thoughts could have such an effect on people! But if you get his mad about the prospect of DP not being around then you just prove my point. This team can not and will not move forward unless he “fully” recovers or they just cut the cord. Last time i checked most teams don’t win much with out a bonafide #1 goalie. And if you really think a 15 year contract was a good idea i have a bridge in brooklyn for sale.
if you get his mad about the prospect of DP not being around then you just prove my point
And where did I say that?
I commented on what a ridiculously stupid idea it would be to buy him out- and that has not changed.
Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)
by TheMetalChick on Mar 17, 2010 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions
Excellent post!!
Once again Dom, EXCELLENT job in detailing. Thanks for your research. I will now be plagerizing it left and right.
;o)
Just kidding.
www.7thwoman.blogspot.com Updated almost as often as PointBlank, but not quite.
Haha, Thanks Dee. I won’t tell.
Lighthouse Hockey: What's wrong with lotteries? I've been in lots of lotteries.
we are a playoff team next season
we are only 8 points from the playoffs, or 4 games. we win a few of the 3rd melt downs and we are in. I would say making it past the 1st round will be tough. Like this year, #8 would face the Caps and probably lose.
I agree that the trade deadline will be tougher next year. we have many guys at the end of contracts next season, tradethem or hold them at a risk of getting nothing back.
do we keep Bergy now, he has had a great end of season but is that enough to sign him again.
Kohn? I would sign him, shouldnt cost much
Moulson has to be signed, hopefully for 3 years
Schremp also needs to be signed
Park maybe, he is a good D forward but if he goes not a huge lose
Weight needs to be behind the bench as an assistant coach
Sim- this is tough, he is scrappy which is always good, and can shoot decent, but can Martin take this role now
jackman- no, Martin can definately take this role, and Gillies for the occasional goon game

by 































