Lighthouse Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Week One: Previews and Predictions for all 15 games

Hurricanes 4, Islanders 1: A do-over would be nice

I did not text Matt Moulson my request, but he delivered anyway by becoming the Islanders' first 20-goal scorer since, heh, Mike Comrie (21) and Bill Guerin (23) in 2007-08. The rest of the night stunk. Rough way to start a road trip.

Game Sum. | Event Sum. | Corsi | Recaps: nhl.com | Isles | Canes Country



Make no mistake: The Islanders did not perform like a team that had any business winning this game. But it was an example of how an early 2-0 hole against a surprisingly organized team can sink you when you didn't bring your best. The Hurricanes converted a soft penalty on Josh Bailey (just his fifth minor of the year) into an early powerplay goal as Bruno Gervais stood pretty much in No Man's Land next to Rick DiPietro while Eric Staal (Oh, is he good?) put in his own rebound unimpeded.

Three minutes later Rob Schremp made a soft dump up the boards in the Islanders zone, and Matt Cullen used a bad-angle screen to pop a shot high over DiPietro. Half-way through the first, 2-0 down despite actually generating a few shifts of sustained pressure and dangerous chances. Then the Hurricanes went into smart, safe, lock-down mode, and the Islanders had no answer. (The Corsi results show the Islanders mostly in the positive and the Canes in the negative, yet anyone watching likely agrees the Isles didn't generate much; I'd call that a product of a few dominating shifts in the first (JT/KO/JB and Sim/Schremp/Bergie) and several outside shots during a comeback attempt.)

A shorthanded Stephane Yelle conversion and an empty-netter helped finish things, with Moulson's 20th in between.

Star-divide

Video Highlights Proof


So there's that.

Answering the Physical Bell with ... a Roster Move?

As noticed earlier this week and commented by Scott Gordon, the Islanders lacked any willingness to, you know, throw checks against Washington. Hits, a notoriously unreliable and subjective stat that varies from rink to rink, were recorded as 18 for the Canes and 12 for the Islanders. Did you notice any change in their physicality?

Related to that, Trevor Gillies, he of 1 NHL game and 21 PIMs, was signed to an NHL contract and will join the team in Philadelphia -- and the Isles have room on the 23-man roster to add him. I speculate this is Tim Jackman insurance (Jackman's still hurt) for Saturday to face the Flyers, one of the few teams that dresses enough fighters with actual skill (Ian Laperriere, Danny Carcillo) that you might need to dress one to do the NHL's testosterone dance of faux self-policing. If Gillies does indeed step into the lineup Saturday, hopefully he brings some fire; but it would also be thick with irony if a healthy scratch move for this four-losses-in-five team was only made to make room for an enforcer who is likely to skate five minutes, max.

The Goalie Rotation

Subjective but fun fodder nonetheless: If I'm wanting to make a push for the playoffs, I'm still making Dwayne Roloson my go-to starter and fitting Rick DiPietro in for long-term evaluation as opportunity warrants. Granted, Roloson was lit up in the first period by Washington, but the Islanders have road back-to-backs Saturday and Sunday, which is a great time to rotate your 1A and (theoretical) 1B. If that back-to-back premise is followed, it looks like DiPietro is set to get two of the first three games on this trip. (Counterpoint: Philadelphia is the toughest opponent for the Isles, so maybe you save your Rollie for that one.)

Regardless, despite a shutout and two nice victories, I still don't think DiPietro has been tested like a #1 yet. He hasn't had to stand on his head or face a deluge, save for his first start in Dallas which was filled with expected rust. Perhaps that's for the best: Ease him in after a year's layoff, and certainly if he's going to regain the old DiPietro form, it can't happen overnight. But in terms of the Islanders' stated goal of the playoffs, well this experimenting with the franchise goaltender is going to be a factor. We always knew that would likely be the case -- the alternative was introducing him when the Isles were out of the race -- but nonetheless, here we are.

On Coaching, and Preparation

The Islanders fell behind 2-0 vs. Carolina after coming out flat and awed against Washington. I have not seen anything that tells me this is a coaching problem -- pretty sure Scotty Bowman coached teams who experienced similar ruts -- but if that's your theory or if you have some other view of things that are not being coached right (special teams?), I'd like to hear what you think.

*  *  *

Don't forget, Saturday is a 1 p.m. EST matinee in Philadelphia.

0 recs  |  Comment 19 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

so...

is the ship sinking, the bubble bursting, or is this just further proof that teams lead by kids under 24 are consistently inconsistent?

why isn't #16 hanging in the rafters?

by bob l on Jan 29, 2010 9:16 AM EST reply actions  

The ship

Is young and getting its sea legs in stops and starts, I suppose?

Lighthouse Hockey: Under contract through 2021, knees and hips be damned.

by Dominik on Jan 29, 2010 10:06 AM EST up reply actions  

hmm

Really difficult to estimate the current situation and this quite strange game hasn’t helped. On the one hand the recent performances indeed have been disappointing and actually already the game against Florida was mediocre. On the other hand the schedule has been very difficult with New Jersey (up for revenge), Washington (hottest team in the league) and then a four-game road-trip starting at Carolina. The Hurricanes have been improving a lot and played a very solid game last night. I thought the urgency was there for the Islanders and was a bit surprised hearing Gordon talk about a lack of desperation in the first two periods. In my opinion, they simply didn’t create enough scoring chances (and of course made other mistakes, such as taking bad penalties or defending poorly). And that was surprising, as they had all season long created a good amount of chances as soon as they got the forecheck going and played with urgency. Not many teams have allowed that few chances against the Islanders, when spending that much time in the own zone. So, I’d conclude the Hurricanes just played a terrific game defensively. And that would make me feel optimistic still, as other opponents will come along. The bad thing is that the next one could be another tough one…

…but an extremely important one. Earlier in the season (also ahead of yesterday’s game for example), I often thought the talks of how big this or that game would be, were a bit premature.
Given the worries in defense and the matches they will throw away from time to time because of that, the Islanders need another big run just to have a realistic chance. And to achieve that they need much more confidence than they’ve showed over the last few games. Every win could help of course and get them on a roll, but I feel a win at Philadelphia would almost certainly do so. It’s an important game in a nice way therefore – huge if they win, but not the end of the world if they lose.

by BenHasna on Jan 29, 2010 10:11 AM EST reply actions  

JT needs to start lighting the lamp again...VERY SOON

or it will be time for Garth to sell off UFAs and get ready for the draft after the break.

by BCISLEMAN on Jan 29, 2010 11:10 AM EST reply actions  

It starts in the net

OK, they stunk and didn’t deserve the win. they have done that before this season and won because Roloson has stolen some games. This team needs top level goaltending every game to win. they do not have the offense to succeed otherwise.

DP will not be DP without at least 20-25 games, and not with one start a week. If they want to stay in the hunt, the only answer is to waive him and send him to bridgeport and get him 3-4 games per week until he regains his form. wasn’t that the whole point of Signing Rollie and Biron? i would also work marty back into the rotation, since shelving him is not helping anyone. Why does this team never seem to do the obvious about personnel moves until months after everyone else gets it?

by randyboyd on Jan 29, 2010 12:10 PM EST reply actions  

Apart from the killer shortie

I thought DP was pretty good…in this start and in most of his other starts. He needs to be competing in NHL games. He won’t get better in Bridgeport. They need JT to start scoring. If he doesn’t, even if they have Brodeur and Miller as a tandem in net, they will not make the playoffs.

by BCISLEMAN on Jan 29, 2010 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

The point of Rollie and Biron was to have quality goaltending until DP comes back and to have insurance once he does. Testing his form at the NHL level was always part of the plan — and implicitly part of the acceptable risk for this season.

I think they want to know what they have now. Waiving him wasn’t really an option; it was rehab starts in the AHL until he’s physically ready and then see if he can handle NHL play. If he’s not going to carry the load at the NHL level, it’s probably better the process of finding that out cost them points this year than next year.

I agree this team’s thin margin of error requires excellent goaltending, but their long-term outlook requires evaluating DP before next year.

Lighthouse Hockey: Under contract through 2021, knees and hips be damned.

by Dominik on Jan 29, 2010 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

and I don't think he's been that bad

he’s been under siege far too much and that has to do with the guys in front of him. Our broadcast team was certainly impressed with the athleticism he showed on a few of his saves last night. He did let in one key soft goal that turned the game around, but its not like he’s the only one who made mistakes yesterday.

by BCISLEMAN on Jan 29, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Bruno, etc.

Bruno Gervais should be in the AHL, not that I want to offend any AHL players or anything.
He consistently plays poorly in his own end. Geez, I would rather have a forward from Bridgeport play D for the Islanders than have him in there – he is just terrible.

Time for Tamby to get some playing time. Even though I like Park, he hasn’t contributed anything in a while, so he should be the next healthy scratch. And Roly should be starting 70% of the games and ease DP in slowly. 2 of last nights goals were very soft.

OK, I feel better now.

by vrwc on Jan 29, 2010 1:03 PM EST reply actions  

assuming it is even possible to send Gervais down (he'd probably have to clear waivers)

who would you replace him with? It’s not like we have this plethora of NHL-ready defenders chomping at the bit itching to get into the NHL. I suspect that Tambellini will only get TOI if and when Garth trades away some of our UFAs…assuming Tambellini himself isn’t traded away. And if we are looking to trade Marty, why isn’t he getting some starts?

by BCISLEMAN on Jan 29, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

OK, I feel better now.

LOL. That’s what it’s all about. :)

I’m uh…my patience is wearing thin on Bruno’s ups and downs. Thought he had a very good game a few games ago. He has enough NHL experience by now for us to expect consistency. There are others waiting in the pipeline.

Lighthouse Hockey: Under contract through 2021, knees and hips be damned.

by Dominik on Jan 29, 2010 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

But not this season

I have said previously, that the defensive situation on the farm isn’t as dire as everyone thinks with Katic, Flood, Gleed and Westgarth and I stand by that. But none of them at this point in their careers are going to be better than what you get from Gervais right now, worts and all.

Westgarth:
34 Games; 2/4/6; -1; 64 PMs

Flood:
39 Games; 4/13/17; Even; 29 Pms

Gleed:
38 Games; 0/12/12; +9; 48 PMs

Katic:
44 Games; 3/11/14; -6; 16 PMs

Westgarth, Gleed and Flood would be good in case another blue liner goes down and I doubt Katic gets called up until next year.

To fight the horde, sing and cry: Valhalla I am coming!

by David Hanssen on Jan 29, 2010 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Right, I wouldn’t cut Bruno now. But in terms of his long-term future, I’m thinking of Kohn and MacDonald, perhaps Katic — guys who fall in the “potentially serviceable” category, which is essentially what Gervais is providing right now.

Lighthouse Hockey: Under contract through 2021, knees and hips be damned.

by Dominik on Jan 29, 2010 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

That I agree with

If Gervais continues to play the way he has, I think the chances are slim he’s back next season.

To fight the horde, sing and cry: Valhalla I am coming!

by David Hanssen on Jan 29, 2010 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

The chances of Gervais coming back: Slim and none

I dont know about that, they like Bruno. If giving defensemen time to “get it” is even more of a time-consumer than it is for forwards, and Jeff Tambellini got another contract, youre THAT sure Bruno wouldnt?

Let Us Go, Islanders! (Ever notice how strange that sounds without the contraction?)

by TheMetalChick on Jan 30, 2010 8:19 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip surgery not required.
Start posting about the Islanders »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Featured Poll

Poll
How long does Nino stay with the Islanders in 2010-11?

  886 votes | Results

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New Jersey 82 48 27 7 103
Pittsburgh 82 47 28 7 101
Philadelphia 82 41 35 6 88
New York Rangers 82 38 33 11 87
New York Islanders 82 34 37 11 79

(updated 4.12.2010 at 9:21 AM EDT)

New York Islanders Roster

# Pos. DOB W H
Josh Bailey 12 C 10/2/1989 188 6-1
Blake Comeau 57 RW 2/18/1986 207 6-1
Rick DiPietro 39 G 9/19/1981 210 6-1
Mark Eaton 0 D 5/6/1977 204 6-2
Mark Flood 4 D 9/29/1984 190 6-1
Bruno Gervais 8 D 10/3/1984 205 6-1
Trevor Gillies 14 LW 1/30/1979 215 6-3
Michael Haley 59 C 3/30/1986 202 5-11
Jack Hillen 38 D 1/24/1986 200 5-11
Trent Hunter 7 RW 7/5/1980 210 6-3
Milan Jurcina 0 D 6/7/1983 236 6-4
Anton Klementyev 48 D 3/25/1990 198 6-1
Dustin Kohn 56 D 2/2/1987 200 6-2
Zenon Konopka 0 C 1/2/1981 213 6-1
Andrew MacDonald 47 D 9/7/1986 188 6-1
Matt Martin 46 LW 3/8/1989 192 6-2
Radek Martinek 24 D 8/31/1976 203 6-1
Matt Moulson 26 LW 11/1/1983 206 6-1
Frans Nielsen 51 C 4/24/1984 172 5-11
Kyle Okposo 21 RW 4/16/1988 200 6-1
P.A. Parenteau 0 LW 3/24/1983 198 6-0
Joel Rechlicz 40 RW 6/14/1987 220 6-4
Dylan Reese 42 D 8/29/1984 195 6-0
Dwayne Roloson 30 G 10/12/1969 180 6-1
Rob Schremp 13 C 7/1/1986 200 5-11
Jon Sim 16 LW 9/29/1977 195 5-10
Mark Streit 2 D 12/11/1977 197 6-0
John Tavares 91 C 9/20/1990 195 6-0
Doug Weight 93 C 1/21/1971 196 5-11
James Wisniewski 0 D 2/21/1984 207 6-0

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

Dan Ellis Leaves Twitter; Can Athletes Have Truly Honest Public Opinions?

Photo +5 updates

SB Nation's Mock NHL Expansion Draft: Winnipeg And Quebec Select Their Teams

Vancouver Canucks' Willie Mitchell, centre, reacts as Calgary Flames' Michael Cammalleri, left to right, Jarome Iginla and Olli Jokinen, of Finland, celebrate Iginla's goal during second period NHL hockey action at GM Place in Vancouver, Tuesday, April 7, 2009.  (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Jonathan Hayward) link

Is Willie Mitchell A Socialist?

More from SBNation.com >

Follow Lighthouse Hockey:

Facebook-icon_medium_medium  Twitter-icon_medium_medium


Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Bard_small WebBard

Scottish_rugby_logo_small David Hanssen

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein