Lighthouse Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Baby Boilers no more: Michigan State-Purdue Preview

The Phaneuf-Okposo hit: Split-second of dirty

This is the part where you tell me, "Like, it's all part of the game, man."

More photos » Jeff McIntosh - AP

This is the part where you tell me, "Like, it's all part of the game, man."

Was Dion Phaneuf's hit on Kyle Okposo dirty? Ultimately, yes. He led with his elbow. End of story. (Seriously. Watch it again. Which part of Phaenuf makes contact with Okposo's face? Watch Phaneuf the whole way. It's hard to skate up to and hit someone without getting your arm up; but that's what NHLers are supposed to know how to do.)

Update: Katie Strang reports Okposo has a "mild concussion" and is cleared to join the team flight. Full video of the entire chaotic sequence here. (Thanks, bkblades.)

Phaneuf lined Okposo up from across the ice and -- in one of the unspoken crimes that often accompanies these hits (including a few of Scott Stevens' most famous ones -- see #8 and #5 in this montage), he let a teammate (or two) set his victim up for him. The backchecking Flame pushed Okposo off course and even more directly into defensive partner Mark Giordano's path, which Phaneuf happily entered while leading making contact with his elbow. [Edit: Maybe "led" is the wrong word. He didn't travel across the ice with his elbow out, obviously, but at the moment that matters his arm left his core to make contact, which tells me he was in the process of delivering a dirty hit. If you can't make the hit with your body compact (that includes knees, btw), perhaps it's not a hit you should be making.]

Star-divide


Should Okposo have "kept his head up?" According to tradition, yes. But people who apply this hockey truism to every hit to the head somehow forget that when you're rushing up ice with two pursuers (the backchecking forward and Giordano -- who was actually in position and closer to Okposo), and the puck gets caught up in tight or in your skates, you're going to look down, and you might not be expecting a third man to be waiting as the predator. A third man who makes a habit of leaving his position just for the sake of such hits.

 

With his elbow.

Of course, if it's the much-heralded Dion Franken-Phaneuf, maybe you should expect it. Maybe against such teams, you should expect every 1-on-2 battle to become an opportunistic 1-on-3 for a guy like Phaneuf. So Phaneuf skated across the ice, leading with his backside, elbow cocked, and when Okposo arrived, Phaneuf put his elbow out and planted it into Okposo's head.

Granted, it's a game of milliseconds. The hit wouldn't have happened quite this way if the backchecker hadn't knocked Okposo off course. And from the time Phaneuf left his side of the ice to the time of impact was under three seconds. From the time Okposo was hit by the backchecker to the time of impact was under 1.5 seconds.

That doesn't change that he led made contact with his elbow.

And you know what? If you can't make a millisecond-decision hit without keeping your elbow into your body, maybe you aren't physically adept enough to be throwing such hits. Scott Stevens generally kept his arm in. Last year Doug Weight -- who was 1-on-1 on Flames coach Brent Sutter's son, not 3-on-1 like Phaneuf -- kept his arm in.

Regardless of the split-second factors and the physical nuances of proper hitting form, though, when Phaneuf makes a preseason hit like this -- not open-ice hits made on his own skating merit, but rather hits set up by the convenience of two teammates funneling a victim into a hopeless situation -- you have to wonder about the proverbial "respect" that players alternately say is or isn't there.

You also have to wonder why Phaneuf, who makes a habit of such hits and clearly thinks himself a bad-ass, was protected by his teammates (usually Giordano) every time an Islander tried to fight him according to hockey's nebulous "Code." If Phaneuf is god's gift to hockey's physicality, why can he not handle his own battles? And if "it's only preseason" and he shouldn't risk himself for some fight in some meaningless game, why can he risk the neurological health of one of the game's young stars in the same meaningless contest?

That's where I am after watching each segment of the video countless times. There will be varying opinions on this episode, just as there are varying opinions on every hit and on the direction and degree of gratuitous violence acceptable in this game. But for me, when a puck carrier already has two players defending him, "keep your head up" is not an acceptable answer to a third guy skating ass-and-elbow first across the ice to take his head off. Not in a split-second, high-speed game such as this.

As far as where the hard-to-define line is with this stuff, it reminds me of Stevens' famous hit against Slava Kozlov, which was legal and arm-in (take note, Dion). (By the way, I loved Stevens, but I also believe his reputation gave him liberties others wouldn't have gotten.) In that hit, Stevens not only takes out Kozlov but also his own defensive partner, Scott Niedermayer. Of course, it's Kozlov who receives the arm-in shoulder to the head, while Niedermayer narrowly avoids catastrophe. That hit has always made me wonder: If you take out your own defensive partner with your big hit, are you really achieving one of our cliched ideals of man-on-man combat? Or are you just a punk taking advantage of a guy who's already in battle with your partner? (I'm speaking to the philosophical intent of this sport, not to the very real in-game and in-series strategic value to Stevens' hit on Kozlov.)

More directly: Is there a point where the definition of "legal" needs to be changed because the rink is the same size but today's players are so much bigger and so much faster than Bobby Clarke? If so, should the powers that be maybe discuss that when they're not fighting amongst themselves?

Anyway, vote in the poll. Tell me I'm insane or I'm too lenient. I don't care. The thing I hate in debates like these is how often we rest our arguments on ancient hockey cliches, rather than carefully considering the nuanced factors at hand. We argue over whether things fit the existing rulebook, but when it comes time to adjust that existing rulebook to reflect new realities, the league and its rudderless union go dark.

Poll
Franken-Phanuf's hit on Okposo: What was it?
Dirty.
319 votes
Clean.
310 votes
Legal, but part of how the league and union should reconsider what's acceptable in today's faster game.
125 votes
Legally intended but illegally executed.
130 votes
Regardless, I just want to say Phaneuf is a punk.
127 votes

1011 votes | Poll has closed

1 recs  |  Comment 125 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I voted dirty

You don’t lead a hit with your elbow.

And Phaneuf clearly followed through with it as well.

He probably had a really nice hit lined up to begin with. I want to watch it again to see if Phaneuf lines that elbow up after Okposo is pushed. I don’t think the play was planned like that though.

I don’t think the puch itseld had any bearing although Okposo probably wouldn’t have had his head so low. Regardless, I think heglances off Phaneuf’s shoulder or gets hung on his back in a clean hit.

Wouldn’t have been any head involvement either. Worst we are looking at is maybe a fractured clavicle or shoulder separation.

Phanuf better get at least 12 for this and a hefty fine.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 12:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I just breathed a huge sigh of relief!!

You have no idea.

Thank god.

I hope Phaneuf’s team mates are reaming him a new one tonight for this fiasco. Guys had to take lumps for his dirty hit and the fact that he would answer for himself.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wanted to add

Hope they play it safe and keep Kyle out till at least late Nov. No need to take chances even with a mild concussion. It’s just not worth it.

Let him have the time he needs. Even if it’s more than what’s expected.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, we don’t need another Lindros.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 1:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m here, and Phaneuf defended himself. Morrency left the bench to go after him, got to him, and got thrown down. He answered the bell, and that should have been that. Not Phaneuf’s fault that the attempted retribution was so feeble. You guys don’t get to set up a gauntlet for him to run until you get the blood you want.

by Resolute on Sep 18, 2009 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Asking him to fight again when he’s not being protected by Giordano, a scrum and a linesman is hardly setting up a gauntlet.

A guy who makes his living this way can probably afford to have a real fight if he wants to send a message that he’s such a bad ass.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really don’t mind people voting and not defending their votes. It’s just a silly Web poll.

People are going to fall on fairly predictable lines depending on their loyalties and sensibilities, so a message board-style war of one interpretation vs. the other repeated ad nauseum doesn’t do anything for me.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Guys had to take lumps for his dirty hit and the fact that he would answer for himself.

It’s interesting how eager they appeared to jump in, though. Giordano freaking flew in like he was protecting Wayne Gretzky.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He also threw an forearm at Morrency when jumping in.

That alone should have gotten him a third man in.

Giordano is a waste and probably won’t last in this league as long as Okposo. Complete piece of trash. I hope the Wrecker takes him out next game.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 1:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're funny

Giordano is a useful addition on the blueline. I do not know anything about Okposo, so maybe he will last longer in the league, but to say Giordano is a waste is rather laughable.

by brisulph on Sep 18, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A 12-game suspension? Are you serious?

He won’t even get a warning from the league.

by AP77 on Sep 18, 2009 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a man's game

Somewhere Princess Sparkle Pony is on the tube, you should probably watch that instead of hockey.

The hit was clean. He didn’t leave his feet, and the elbow is close enough to his body that he isn’t ‘throwing it’ or leading with hit.

You should tank Phaneuf for teaching him the most basic lesson about cutting across the middle of the ice. Keep. Your. Head. Up.

by velociraptor on Sep 18, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Typical Phaneuf...

He’s a big guy who thinks he’s a “bad-ass” when he’s actually a coward…has been since his days in the WHL with Red Deer…. won’t actually fight anyone unless they are under 5’8" but just ask him, he’s a “bad-ass”. Always needs someone to come to his rescue…maybe he should try to fight a battle for himself… perhaps someday he’ll agree to go with someone like, lets say Rypien, (goes back to junior hockey when Phaneuf gave Rypien a dirty slash across the hand breaking his knuckles)…but he wouldn’t go with Rypien after Rypien was able to return and even went so far as to leave the ice every time Rypien came on…now that’s some “bad-ass” cowardice!!!!

by PJ413 on Sep 18, 2009 1:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Phaneuf just lost tons of respect after that hit

Despite it being dirty, you throw a hit like that, you answer for it.

That’s how the code works. It’s probably why a lot of the older players don’t respect the guys playing now. Phaneuf is too chickenshit to answer for himself.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 1:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He did. He wrestled down the guy who went at him. He does not have to run a gauntlet of every single Islander because one of their teammates got hit hard.

by Resolute on Sep 18, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

After running away

Phaneuf was running away the whole time and refused to answer for that hit.

He also ran away from Martin.

He’s a complete coward.

Even Guerin, who’s not as big as Phaneuf, will answer for hit when challenged. Phaneuf is a coward and a cheapshot artist.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whatever your excuses, Morrency did get to Phaneuf, and was easily thrown down. Sorry kid, that was your shot. You blew it.

by Resolute on Sep 18, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not my excuse

Phanuef is a coward and that’s a fact.

Phaneuf did nothing but run from Morrency.

You can even see the look on Dawe’s face and tell he was not happy with Phaneuf. Even Iginla was really annoyed by the guy.

Phanuef ran and you’re displaying pure homerism on that.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Said the pot to the kettle.

by Resolute on Sep 18, 2009 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wait, he had respect before the hit?

The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Sep 18, 2009 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

More from Strang's twitter

This:

Players were not happy with Phaneuf; upset that after a hit like that he wouldnt respond when challenged to fight

It is not Phaneuf’s job to answer, only to deliver. 3-on-1.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 1:07 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Talk about timing, right Dom? I agree with your take on this and voted dirty. I think he did have his elbow out, but even if he didn’t that hit is complete horse shit. Especially in the pre-season. I’m glad you called out Stevens for some of his hits. You could say he had some help on number 9, as well. I hope someone feeds Phaneuf his lunch this year. Iginla is a bad ass. Phaneuf is a punk.

A man must have a code.

by Fehr and Balanced on Sep 18, 2009 1:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Talk about timing, right Dom?

Heh, I know, I was thinking to myself, “Don’t rewrite, just dig up the Fehr conversation you just had.”

I’ve always been a third-party observer to Phaenuf’s tactics and karma; now I’ve got a vested interest in seeing his lunch force-fed.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 2:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dirty

Like Stevens and Pronger before him.

Fortunately, they “play the game the right way.”

You know, I’m not normally one for hockey-style justice or whatever. Just once, however, I’d like to see the enforcers in the league lay out some of these so-called tough guys. High-hitting, elbow-leading meets fist-in-the-face.

Man, what I wouldn’t give to see Clark Gillies go at one of the aforementioned cowards.

by AP77 on Sep 18, 2009 1:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That’s the thing. Clarkie wouldn’t have just stood up. He woulda pummelled Phaneuf into submission.

by BCISLEMAN on Sep 18, 2009 1:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am sick of all these armchair players who think that having your head down absolves the other player of all wrong doing. I’m a Canucks fan, and by rights I hate Phaneuf, but that was just plain dirty for a pre-season game. There was no reason in a mean nothing game to lay the kid our like that, except that Phaneuf is a jerk. The rumour is that other players in the league used to call him “210” cause he had been in the league 2 years and acted like he had played ten. You Isles fans probably don’t get much Northwest division news, but apparently the rest of the players on the Flames hate the guy.

by Ice Cubes on Sep 18, 2009 1:35 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Retards!

You guys obviously either have zero hockey experience, have never watched a game, or don’t know a thing about the sport.

The hit was clean, fair and square. This isn’t the AHL or the WHL. Its the NHL.. Every game is meant to be played at 100%, by every player, every minute of ice they have. They practice at 100%. These guys aren’t thinking about holding ANYTHING back from their game. The way they play in the pre season is the way they play in the regular season and is the way they play in the post season. I don’t care if he thinks hes a bad ass, is a punk, or is a coward. Its hockey. Often these qualities are what make a good player a great player.

Hockey is great because you need to be accountable for yourself at all times on the ice. Okposo didn’t for 3 seconds tonight and Phaneuf made him pay for it. I love it. Hits like this can and will always happen in hockey, and you should LOVE them. Its not often that you get to see them.

One of the saddest days the NHL ever experienced was the day Scott Stevens retired.

“at least 12 and a hefty fine”??? You’re retarded. Nothing will happen.

by petegriff on Sep 18, 2009 1:36 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Leading a hit with your elbow is not what makes hockey a great sport

And yes, hits like that should get 12 games.

You don’t lead hits with your elbows. You should think twice about lecturing people on the game and calling them retards before issuing such a ridiculous statement such as this.

And Phaneuf was nothing resembling accountable for that hit. He’s a joke for running away from a small guy like morrency. Even more for the elbow.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 1:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Go watch a practice or an intersquad scrimmage and tell me these guys don’t know how to pull back. Go watch an All Star game and tell me these guys don’t realize careers are on the line and there’s a time to scale back the hitting. Don’t tell me Phaneuf doesn’t have the ability to lower his intensity level because it’s not true. Hitting is awesome and it is part of the reason hockey is so special, but that hit was absolutely unnecessary in a meaningless game.

A man must have a code.

by Fehr and Balanced on Sep 18, 2009 1:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve been following the sport for over 40 years. It was a dirty play. Another player spun Okposo into Phaneuf. Okposo didn’t have a chance to prepare himself for the hit and Phaneuf led with his elbow to the head. And Stevens would never have let someone fight his battles for him the way Phaneuf did. He’s a coward and cowards don’t make great players. Feel free to disagree but lose the personal comments. They are not welcome here.

by BCISLEMAN on Sep 18, 2009 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

don’t know what the hell you’re talking about, last I checked you play defense before you play the hit, and there is no reason he had to make that move to recover the puck. There is no excuse for that whatsoever and if you don’t believe that then don’t open your mouth because you obviously couldn’t have made it past pee wees.

by albeezle on Sep 18, 2009 1:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha I really got you guys riled up there. I apologize for the personal comments, I only was upset about the "12 game and hefty fine" remark. I bet Chickendirt doesn’t like fighting either. Had this been a regular season game, could we agree it was a fair play?

by petegriff on Sep 18, 2009 1:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would disagree for the reasons I have mentioned. And as someone observed above, it wasn’t even smart defense. Moreover…read my comments about Denis.

by BCISLEMAN on Sep 18, 2009 1:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah, you still sound just as stupid even attempting to butter it up

If you ask me if I really think he would get that, my answer is no.

This is the NHL and the morons running the league would be rare to see even four for that or even a fine.

But you don’t think an elbow shot like that deserves at least that much. That makes me wonder; WTF is wrong with you?

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 2:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You guys obviously either have zero hockey experience, have never watched a game, or don’t know a thing about the sport.

Right off the bat with the common jock vernacular. Let me ask, if you’re so experienced and all worldly about hockey, how come we don’t see you on television or on another social medium as a hockey analyst?

This isn’t the AHL or the WHL. Its the NHL.. Every game is meant to be played at 100%, by every player, every minute of ice they have. They practice at 100%. These guys aren’t thinking about holding ANYTHING back from their game. The way they play in the pre season is the way they play in the regular season and is the way they play in the post season.
I have no idea why the AHL or WHL was brought into your argument, since it’s irrelevant and inaccurate. I’m not sure where in the magical handbook that says sports athletes only play at maximum level when they’re in the big leagues, but it doesn’t even matter. Why? Well, you seem to be under the impression that blindsiding a player who had two defenders on him is playing at 100%. That’s not playing with an edge or with full effort, that’s being reckless. Phaneuf completely took himself out of the play despite the puck being already pokechecked away from Okposo. It was an unnecessary hit because it caused no other purpose. The puck wasn’t taken away from the hit at any point.
Hockey is great because you need to be accountable for yourself at all times on the ice. Okposo didn’t for 3 seconds tonight and Phaneuf made him pay for it. I love it. Hits like this can and will always happen in hockey, and you should LOVE them. Its not often that you get to see them.
Accountability sounds more than fair. And you’re right in the sense that Okposo should have had his head up at that point, since he did have a defender directly in front of him if anything else. But where is the accountability on Phaneuf’s part? Why did he continually back away from answering the bell? All I gathered from that game was his so-called “marginal” teammates having to defend Phaneuf and ultimately, receiving fighting majors on his behalf. That doesn’t sound like accountability to me. If the “Hockey Code” is to “Keep your head up”, then I guess Phaneuf missed the memo about justifying his hit and upholding the much revered “Code”.

Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell

by bkblades on Sep 18, 2009 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

petegriff

Sorry pal, you lost me at “Retards!” When wanting people to take my “hockey experience” seriously, I tend to go with a different intro.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 2:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

bullshit

You know why this is complete horseshit? Because Okie had taken the hit from behind and was trying to regain puck control. You don’t make a move laterally unless you completely intend to level someone. It’s just bad defense, because if Phaneuf wiffs, then Okposo is home free… BUT WAIT there was a defenseman on Okposo’s side of the ice in perfect position to make a clean hit! …. Come the fuck on. What the hell is Phaneuf playing for anyway? I hope Iginla said something to him later about that, that’s no way to gain respect around the league, fucking pansy.

by albeezle on Sep 18, 2009 1:46 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Anyway, the news from Katie sounds encouraging. Don’t know about keeping KO out until November…but they should definitely be careful with him. Between KO, Bergy, Weight, and Frans, we are not getting off on the right foot injury wise.

by BCISLEMAN on Sep 18, 2009 2:02 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow this is horrendous. Downie/McAmmond anyone?

I think my main issue with this hit is that it’s preseason. That’s not to say I wouldn’t think it was dirty during the regular season, but it’s preseason hockey. In the grand scheme of things this happened between two guys who are NOT fighting for a roster position. That irritates me.

Follow the Penguins on SBN @ Pensburgh.com and twitter.

by FrankD on Sep 18, 2009 2:14 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

CLEAN

And that’s all there is to it. There was NO elbow lead, that’s a ridiculous assertion. His shoulder made contact first, and his arm followed through. And as for not “standing up for himself”, he DID. The guy who tried to jump him came off the bench and charged him, dropping his gloves on the way. All Gio did was prevent a Bertuzzi/Moore incident, not fight Phaneuf’s battle for him. The only thing I can agree with so far is that this was a pre-season game, and it wasn’t entirely called for. But you take ’em when you can get ’em. Clean, legal hit.

by Biebs on Sep 18, 2009 2:23 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

All Gio did was prevent a Bertuzzi/Moore incident, not fight Phaneuf’s battle for him.

Well, considering Morrency didn’t attack Phaneuf from behind, I would say that it was nothing like the Bertuzzi/Moore incident. Phaneuf saw him coming from a mile away and even pushed him away as he skated backwards.

Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell

by bkblades on Sep 18, 2009 2:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Morency charged him from behind, and just as Phaneuf turns is when Gio shoved Morency.

by Biebs on Sep 18, 2009 2:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Incorrect. At 0:07 of the video in this post, Phaneuf turns to see Morency coming for him, while Giordano isn’t even to the center faceoff circle yet. This really isn’t disputable.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 2:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I saw Phaneuf skating backwards. And a mob of teammates and refs in the way before he actually engaged.

Biebs: If you’re going to argue that he had no reason to fight a smaller player, then don’t argue that he stood up for himself. Because he had plenty of opportunities to take on much bigger players — to wave his teammates off, even, but instead he let them take care of things for him.

The Bertuzzi/Moore comparison is insane. The thought there was no elbow is … well that’s not what I see after repeated viewings of the only angle available.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 2:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m sorry, but I have just watched it several times and he did lead with his elbow. And he was clearly backing away from a much smaller player and letting his teammate fight his battles.

by BCISLEMAN on Sep 18, 2009 2:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who cares if it was “clean”? There is no call for a hit like that in a pre-season game. Phaneuf knew Okoposo had his head down and would be hurt. It isn’t like Phaneuf is trying out for a roster spot and had to look tough. Unacceptable. I hope Iggie reads him the riot act. Maybe Brent Sutter will.

by Ice Cubes on Sep 18, 2009 2:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I played around with that video at the three second mark and that shot is clearly all elbow

From impact to follow through. On the follow through Phaneuf’s forarm is planted right on the side of Okposo’s head.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 2:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not only that, it looks like that’s where the upward motion (and removal of Okposo’s helmet/visor) comes from: Phaneuf’s arm swinging upward.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 2:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can't get the frames that tight

Right about there I can see Okposo’s head is nowhere near Phaneuf’s shoulder at all and it’s clearly forarem. Little further you can see the follow through and Okposo’s head going in a wierd direction with the forearm planted between the ear and the neck following through.

That hit is so clearly a head shot and all elbow.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 2:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only thing you see is Dion’s glove, not his elbow. His elbow was against his ribs and it’s his glove which only looks like it’s on his head.

by Biebs on Sep 18, 2009 2:45 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nah, I see his whole forearm leaving his body before the hit — there’s a gap between his forearm and body through which you can see the ice. It’s not the best angle, but when I view full screen that’s what I see.

Again: It’s not easy to hit while keeping your body compact, but it’s what you’re supposed to do.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 2:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yup, his body is open

and nowhere near compact.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 2:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, no sale. He led with his elbow. And I don’t know how the glove leaves the laceration on his cheekbone unless he punches him in the face.

by BCISLEMAN on Sep 18, 2009 2:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dom, there is another video on RDS for the full replay. I don’t know if you can watch it or if it’s only available for Canadian viewers.

http://www.rds.ca/video/visionneuse.html?video=32288

Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell

by bkblades on Sep 18, 2009 2:53 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Thanks! Man, that clip really captures the whole chaos of the situation. Biron coming out. Pacifists Martinek and Biron pairing off. Oh hockey, the stories you provide.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 2:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The look on Dawes face when paired with Martinek says a thousand words

It’s like WTF did that asshole just do.

He didn’t look happy about that at all or willing to throw down for it.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 3:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That clearer than the youtube one

That will probably go to the league for review.

It is clearly a dirty hit even with that video.

Suspensions getting handed out are another story. Phaneuf should get some time for it but I doubt it happens.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 2:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mr Sloppy seconds is chicken shit. If youre going to go after teams stars then answer the bell and fight a guy. I bet you $ he isnt in the lineup for the next game. I guess Avery’s ex only goes out with Aholes. Just like Stevens, Ulf S and other dirty F’s eventually got theirs, somebody will eventually teach him a lesson

by lostsin44 on Sep 18, 2009 9:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nott a penalty.
I like KO and dilike Slabface, but I can’t testify that he “led” with the elbow.

Put this clip in the list of exhibits in support of the “contact to opponent’s head” penalty they talk about periodically.

by briandunne on Sep 18, 2009 10:19 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Probably “led” was the wrong word, since he didn’t travel across the ice with his elbow out. But he skated with the left side of his body facing the play (arm cocked rather than shoulder down), and when Okposo neared, Phaneuf brought his arm/forearm/elbow out for the impact. Combine that with the 3-on-1 nature and it doesn’t pass the smell test.

Hitters so often throw their arm out at the last second for balance and/or to deliver the brunt of the impact, and I don’t accept that. If a skater is supposed to be 100% aware every millisecond even with two defenders on him before a third defender comes in to cream him, then that defender should be 100% in control of his body and limbs to make damn sure it’s not his elbow pad doing the hitting.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It took me a while to really analyze the hit...

If you guys have been around Lighthouse long enough, you know that I tend to over-analyze potential penalty situations (testify Dom, testify!). In this case, as with many other cases over the past two years, I feel that the NHL is going to fail miserably in handing out suspensions and disciplinary action where it’s due.

Without a doubt Pascal Morency, line change or not (he comes off the bench AFTER the play was blown dead) deserves a suspension of a minumum of 5 games. That kind of behavior just doesn’t fly.

Phaneuf is a different story. Let’s analyze the play:

Okposo skates up the middle of the ice with the puck barely hanging on to his blade. He’s covered by 2 Flames players, the forward who is properly back-checking and the the left defenseman who is in position to force Okposo to the outside.

Phaneuf conciously makes a decision to skate OUT OF HIS LANE as a right defensemen to come after Okposo.

Okposo loses the puck to a good back-check by the forward and is extending to regain control and if you’ve ever played the game in this situation you almost certainly have your head down (even at the NHL level) to spot the puck.

Phaneuf keeps his elbow IN until the force of the impact drives his arm up and out. This was a shoulder check with a followthrough. Not uncommon but certainly not warranted in open ice. What irks me about the hit is the total irrelevance to the play as a whole and the fact that he does LEAVE HIS FEET to deliver the hit. Phaneuf has no neccesity to be on that side of the ice as proper defensive technique dictates that he stay on his side of the ice (again, if you’ve ever played, this was taught to you).

Frankly, IMHO this was a dirty hit. Regular season, pre-season, playoffs is irrelevant. As far as relevance to the play and the idea of fair-play and keeping an opponent’s well-being in mind in relation to the position he’s in at that moment, Phaneuf disregarded everything that makes this game great.

I ask those of you who think this is a clean hit, what happens at the end of a playoff series? The teams shake hands, right? Well, if this happened in the Western Conference Finals for example, I can guarantee you that there would be a bench clearing brawl. There is a certain etiquette that every hockey player lives and dies by:

Phaneuf stepped over the line and deserves a suspension. What should be 5 games minimum won’t even be a slap on the wrist but at least we know it should be that long.

From the Penalty Box to the Blog Box! Check it out at Isles Official's Outlook!

Follow Me on Twitter

by IslesOfficial on Sep 18, 2009 10:55 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Phaneuf did not leave his feet. The force of the impact knocked him off his feet.

One lesson learned for Okposo: Keep your head up when you cut across the middle of the ice. Phaneuf was coming across because the kid painted a giant target on himself. Okposo getting bumped a little, knocking him off stride right before the hit did not help at all. That was an unfortunate aspect of the play that made things worse.

Glad the kid is going to be alright, because nobody wants to see a player get hurt. But you know what? Ask Brandon Sutter about the price you pay for skating with your head down after New York Islander Doug Weight caught him.

by Resolute on Sep 18, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

To answer the Brandon Sutter comment:

Last year’s hit by Doug Weight was similar in nature but differed for a few reasons.

1) Brandon Sutter SAW Weight coming and conciously decided to extend for the puck at the last second.

2) Weight was REACTING to Sutter’s body position (head down) and seemed to TRY and pull up although as we all know he was unsuccessful at making the adjustment.

3) Weight expressed remorse immediately after the incident like a true professional and someone who might actually care about the welfare other human beings.

Phaneuf’s hit exhibited none of these things.

From the Penalty Box to the Blog Box! Check it out at Isles Official's Outlook!

Follow Me on Twitter

by IslesOfficial on Sep 18, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nobody is ever going to accuse Phaneuf of being a people person, but ultimately there is one undeniable fact of hockey: If you come across the centre of the ice staring at your skates, someone is going to knock you flat on your ass. Sometimes the person receiving the hit gets hurt. It sucks that it happened in this case, and I really do hope Okposo is okay, and goes onto a fantastic season. You guys definitely need some good news this year.

The frustration over this hit is understandable though. Nobody wants to see their guy get creamed like that. But when you get right down to it, the only thing wrong with that entire play is Morrency leaving the bench to start a fight. He’s going to get an automatic ten gamer for that, and all he managed to accomplish was to get thrown down by Phaneuf.

by Resolute on Sep 18, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's no need to lead with your elbow

That’s indefensable.

Last season Wieght could have taken liberties like that on Sutter and didn’t. It’s dirty and not defendable no matter what position your target is in. Weight, even noticing the position his target was in, did not throw his whole body into the hit.

That’s called respect.

It’s not a matter of Phaneuf being a “people person”. It’s a matter of respect.

1) Phaneuf clearly led with his elbow EVEN BEFORE HE GOT OKPOSO.

2) There’s no need for a hit like that in a preseason game when you’re not fighting for a roster spot.

3) The follow through in that hit, even taking the elbow out of the equation, was not called for. Phaneuf has enough time to see Okposo’s position. Instead of laying off a bit HE JACKS OUT HIS ELBOW.

Piece of trash. I hope the rest of his days in this game are met with fighting off other guys. Phaneuf gets no respect.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can invent reasons to pretend it was a dirty hit all you want. I can’t change your mind, and I won’t even try.

Truth is, this was as much an elbow as Weight’s hit was. Given the way you’ve been running around this thread, I’m not exactly surprised your viewpoint is as biased as it is.

by Resolute on Sep 18, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not even close

When a guy on my team throws a dirty hit I call it.

I thought Pocks hit last season was dirty and deserved more than the suspension received. There was no question that was a dirty hit.

Phaneufs hit was all elbow. I’ve watched it many a times and it’s clear. He even jacked it out before he got there and followied through with it the whole way.

He has had a reputation for that for a while and this is not a one time incident. Fact of the matter is Phaneuf is not talented enough, skilled or smart enough to deliver a clean open ice hit. He’s a trash player and the only reason he’s never been carried off a stretcher is the instigator penalty.

Make excuses all you like. Even his own team mates didn’t like the head and aren’t defending him. Even after the hit the look on Dawe’s and Iginla’s faces tell the whole story. They were completely embarassed by the whole episode.

by Chickendirt on Sep 18, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Truth is, this was as much an elbow as Weight’s hit was.

Nah. Weight’s body was compact, he made extra effort to keep his arm in, and he remained on his two feet after the hit.

Phaneuf comes in awkward, ass-and-arm first, and doesn’t give a damn if the precarious position throws his arm out and lands his own tush on the ice.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I find it really interesting how everybody is seeing different things in the videos.

Elbow in/out? Stay on/leave feet? Clean/dirty? Good/bad defense? Pansy/prudent for not fighting? etc…. The only thing everyone seems to be agreeing on is that it was an unnecessary and violent hit. As IO above said this hit, whether pre-, reg, or post-season, would be a controversial hit.

Also, in defense of the fans who cheered the hit at the game (myself included), once we realized Okposo was injured, we quieted down pretty quickly, and I for one am glad he was only mildly injured.

by Biebs on Sep 18, 2009 11:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for that. Didn’t realize last night that you were at the game.

And to your larger point:

I find it really interesting how everybody is seeing different things in the videos.

Me, too. At the end of the day, I’m: 1) Concerned for Okposo’s health; 2) Taking on a new villain in Phaneuf; 3) Wondering, as always, if this tells us something about the speed of the game today; and 4) Bemused by the varying and quite firm interpretations. I can’t even find agreement with some people who also think it was wrong.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This was clean within the rules

But I am not a fan of this style of hit. Something needs to be changed about it, as someone is going to end up perma bran damaged (and this is from a Flames fan).

by brisulph on Sep 18, 2009 11:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well, I think I’ve said it before, but it’s quite refreshing when these hit debates happen on teams other than the Ducks — seems I was fielding a lot of this conversation two years ago.

Still, I don’t think I ever wrote anything this compelling — well done, Dominik. I even voted dirty.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Sep 18, 2009 11:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ha! Thanks. I know, I hate this role. Last night I thought I was monitoring a meaningless preseason game — then three drinks in, “Oh crap. I gotta write something coherent now.”

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ten games out with no pay

The suspension should start with the first game of the regular season

by Hockey Hillbilly on Sep 18, 2009 12:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Clean but!!

I was at the game which until the ‘hit’ was totally under the Isle’s control! Kyle was a key to most of the offensive play, but everyone looked good on the ice for NY.

As for the hit it was clean even though it did deserve a pounding…where is the new Gillies? I was taught that when your on the ice you always keep your head up…including going to the boards. It always should fall equally on players who have there head down or back turned. If your head is down or your back turned you’re an idiot (at that moment)!

Finally, as for Morency’s action it is not only acceptable it is required or guys like Phaneuf will take out every good player on the ice. If he gets beat on, then next time he’ll consider who the goon is that will come after him…ask Don (Cherry)!
Also if you watch the replay you’ll see that 2 of the Isle’s head for a change…Morency jumps on the ice then the 2 guys decide not to leave the ice. It should be noted that only 1 Isle really got involved and he was legally on the ice as he had now way of knowing they hadn’t left the ice…that’s just a BS call if they suspend him!
Let’s hear it for real hockey…good luck Kyle (keep your head up)…kick the Flames butts on Saturday!!!

by Gordo55 on Sep 18, 2009 12:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It’s not a BS call if Morrency is suspended. It is automatic per the rules.

There are no line changes until the referees signal it. When there is an incident on the ice, they will never signal a line change before calming the situation first. Morrency did not come over on a legal line change. He came over specifically to engage Phaneuf in an altercation. As the first player off the bench, that is an automatic ten game suspension. The second player had the same ideas, but fortunately stopped himself. If he had come over, he would have received an automatic five gamer.

by Resolute on Sep 18, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

On keeping your head up

Okay, I agree with the Cardinal Rule to keep your head up. But answer me this: Does that really apply in this situation? In other words, when the puck gets lost in your skates/in tight as one backchecker hits you from the side/rear, is a coach going to be happy you completely ignored the puck just to avoid getting your clock cleaned?

Part of my greater issue with hits like this is that Okposo sure looked pretty well aware of the backchecker pursuing him and the defenseman who was on his side of the ice. It’s the third guy who he didn’t see, and that guy happens to be one who shows up at random spots on the ice just to nail someone.

Are we really expecting players to see that third guy in this situation? If not, given today’s speed and size, should we maybe expect players to have a little more of their self-professed respect for one another? And for those who don’t, should we expect Phaneuf to be a little more willing to back his extraordinary actions up with more than a throwdown at the end of a chaotic scrum?

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

CLEAN!!!!!

I can’t even see where the elbow is, sure the impact of the hit makes it look like the elbow might of been thrown but before the hit its tight to his body, I am sorry but that is a clean hit, if you watch the RDS feed you can see that OK had closed his hand on the puck before even dropping the puck and it should of been whistled down there, but the hit is clean, keep your head up and protect yourself!. As for the comments on Phaneuf not fighting, way risk getting an eye injury over that and not being able to play.

by Dosed on Sep 18, 2009 1:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Honestly, it’s the RDS feed that convinces me his arm came up before impact. The YouTube version was jerky for me and made that a little harder to tell.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BS Call

Resolute, watch closely…the 2 guys were already going to the bench before any call and yes, Morency knew where he was heading, but it was definately a good change by him. The suspension should be to one of the guys who went to the bench. They looked back saw where Morency was going so fast and decided to return to the play.

I’ve watched and liked both these teams since they were in the same division, so I have no real favourite and because of that I say…Phaneuf clean hit (I wouldn’t do it) and Morency good change but maybe wrong time to even the score (team-mate on the ice)…emotion is hard to fight! My guess youth coaching is still the issue, as it was 30+ years ago.

by Gordo55 on Sep 18, 2009 1:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I’m sorry, but the referees would NEVER allow a line change when they know there is a scrum on the ice. Never. Morrency should have known better. Another player who also thought about jumping over did think better. He went on for the express purpose of engaging in an altercation. Per the rule book, this is a cut and dry situation.

That isn’t to say Morrency is the devil or what not. I rather admire his dedication to his teammates, and his desire to stand up for them. Coming over the bench was a bad call though, and it is why he got the game misconduct. The referees will have reported to the league that he was ejected for coming onto the ice expressly to engage in an altercation. At that point, it becomes one case where Campbell’s Wheel of Justice doesn’t matter.

by Resolute on Sep 18, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Clean hit

One solution to avoid the hit is keep your fookin head up.

As far as leading with the elbow, depending on the angle of the hit, well yeah, the elbow is going to be leading even if it’s pinned to the side.

Some days its just not worth chewing through the restraints

by spectr17 on Sep 18, 2009 2:01 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

And if the elbow isn’t not pinned to the side? It’s the checker’s responsibility to keep it back in. I don’t get this idea that puck-carriers are infinitely responsible for their own body position but checkers get free reign when the come flying in to blow shit up.

Okposo wasn’t steaming head-down through the neutral zone with his head down like some Lindros, nor was he “staring at his skates” (as was mentioned higher up the thread). He was reacting to two suddenly changing factors (being knocked from behind/side and the puck coming in tight), with a second’s reaction, while the third defender coming from clear across the ice is who reamed him.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Clean

I have never been a fan of Dion Phaneuf because I’ve always felt the ‘big’ hits so many people praised him were borderline dirty and displayed weaknesses in his game that are almost unforgivable in a defenseman (mainly that he would run so far out of position trying to score that big goal or chasing that highlight-reel hit that he left both his defensive partner and his goalie vulnerable to an odd-man rush and an easy goal by the other team). When I read the headline the Phaneuf had knocked out another player, I expected another undisciplined, borderline illegal hit displaying the poor checking technique that has become so commonplace the post-lockout NHL. So one can imagine my surprise when I watched the various video clips of Phaneuf’s hit on Okposo and discovered that there was really nothing illegal about it.

Kyle Okposo was skateing the puck up ice through the neutral zone with his head down, possibly the worst mistake any forward could ever make (and if you don’t believe me, jjust ask Brandon Sutter, Shane Willis, Slava Kozlov, Eric Lindros, Paul Kariya, et. al.). As a resut, he was unable to see the lay of the land accurately and only registered the presence of a Calgary defenseman in front of him and one of the Flames’ backchecking forwards pursuing him from behind and was completely blindsided when Phaneuf seized the opportunity and swooped in from right to left and caught Okposo with his upper arm/shoulder (anyone objectively reviewing the video should be able to recognize that the only part of Phaneuf’s arm that made contact with Okposo was well above his elbow and the only reason for this in the first place would be because Okposo did not have his head up). And while Phaneuf’s feet did leave the air, it was not until impact had already been made, the force of which being what sent him flying in the first place.

As is often the case whenever a big hit results in a player leaving the ice either propped up between two teammates or on a stretcher, this event seems destined to serve as an debate about the legality of every on-ice act ever committed by Scott Stevens, not only one of the greatest defenseman and open-ice hitters ever to play the game, but also one of the most controversial. Stevens was a truly remarkable player who was particularly adept at reading the play almost before it happened. During his career as a Devil, he never ran out of position looking for a big hit, but rather waited for the play to unfold and let the opportunities come to him, and they did. Stevens’ modus operandi was to lie in wait at the Devils’ blue line for opposing forwards attempting to carry the puck into the Devils blue line and skate in from left to right, meeting them going in the opposite direction. I find the idea that defenseman ‘lining up’ the puck carrier in an attempt to knock him out of the play, thus preventing a scoring chance, is somehow dirty or illegal ridiculous. Hockey is not a contact sport, it’s an impact sport, and things like this, though unfortunate and sometimes scary, happen. If that offends someone’s delicate sensibilities, I suggest they watch a low-impact sport like baseball. It’s more their speed.

And as a Devils fan, I’m not sure what was meant when you wrote Scott Stevens’ used his reputation to take ‘liberties,’ but I can’t help but feel slightly offended by it. Stevens was a fierce competitor and brilliant leader whose size and punishing physical play intimidated his opponents. Is that what you meant?

by kellyn on Sep 18, 2009 2:28 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Thanks for a thoughtful response
During his career as a Devil, he never ran out of position looking for a big hit, but rather waited for the play to unfold and let the opportunities come to him, and they did. Stevens’ modus operandi was to lie in wait at the Devils’ blue line…

And note that Phaneuf did not wait, but rather ran out of position to hit a guy who was already well covered. There was no scoring chance to prevent. Okposo was in no man’s land, 1-on-2 already, with the rest of his line on a line change. I argue Phaneuf got his elbow up as well, but obviously you see it differently. Beyond that, I’ve already said my view of the details of the incident in this thread.

If that offends someone’s delicate sensibilities, I suggest they watch a low-impact sport like baseball. It’s more their speed.
Ah yes. Shall I take more testosterone injections while I’m at it? Perhaps remove my skirt? Seriously, I appreciate your view … until you reverted to this cliche.
I’m not sure what was meant when you wrote Scott Stevens’ used his reputation to take ‘liberties,’ but I can’t help but feel slightly offended by it. Stevens was a fierce competitor and brilliant leader whose size and punishing physical play intimidated his opponents. Is that what you meant?
Thought I made it clear that I admired Stevens. Thought I already stated the fact he remains on his feet after hits shows he had more of a clue than Phaneuf. But also, as you can see in his hit highlight reels, Stevens was worshiped for some hits that other players would’ve been crucified for. He was afforded liberties thanks to his reputation as “a fierce competitor and brilliant leader,” which seemed to provide him cover even when he went over the line.

   People like a black-and-white version of things, and they like people to worship. Thus, Stevens made great hits/was a great leader = Stevens cannot err. I do not accept that.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not only did he lie in wait to headhunt guys but Stevens also did it in meaningless situations just so he could hit somebody (See Ron Francis and Shane Willis hits and see the score of those games, the devils had already won those games….) Just like Phaneuf, its a meaningless game were the guy was already covered (by 2 players) and if he missed all that would happen is his coach would yell at him for being out of position, and its a preseason game so who cares about the score. So in other words he wouls not have tried that if it was 2 to 2 in the third period of a regular season game. So watch out for the Phaneuf train when the game does not count or its settled cause he willll try to take your head off. By the way SS might have been dirty but at least he stood up like a man and if challenged fought after. Oh and for the record the Dough Weight hit was dirty because of the same reason, there is no reason to take somebody out when they are helpless (Nik Lidstrom would never do this and he is a way better player than either SS or Phaneuf, there is definitly a way to stop the play without headhunting). If Im an Isles player trying to make a name why dont I clock a CGY defenseman when they are going back for an icing, after all thats when they are at their most vulnerable… Wonder if hypocrite Sutter (its only dirty when its my son) would agree it was clean also if somebody hunts for Iggy or Bowmeester on Sat. And if we had a dirty player like Tucker or a Steve Downie or a Carcillo dont you think some kind of dirty retribution on a CGY star would be coming? One can only hope Karma strikes that chicken shit

by lostsin44 on Sep 18, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh and for the record the Dough Weight hit was dirty because of the same reason, there is no reason to take somebody out when they are helpless

I understand why you’d say that, and that collision turned my stomach — apparently, I just have “delicate sensibilities.” But I feel Weight was going after an originally 50/50 puck, Sutter reached for it and then actually put his head lower at the last second. It was 1-on-1 (not 1-on-3), Weight kept his body completely compact, and he clearly wasn’t trying to kill a guy. I think he did the best he could given the moment-to-moment circumstances.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not only did he lie in wait to headhunt guys but Stevens also did it in meaningless situations just so he could hit somebody (See Ron Francis and Shane Willis hits and see the score of those games, the devils had already won those games….)

The examples given above as ‘evidence’ in the ongoing trial of the legality of Scott Stevens hitting career makes me question whether or not you’ve watched more than just the footage of the hits themselves and bothered to take into account the context in which the situation occurred. Scott Stevens has been criticized for his hit on Willis not because it was in any way dirty or illegal (Willis collected a Brian Rafalski clearing attempt at center ice and proceeded to carry the puck through the neutral zone with his head down, where Stevens dropped him with a textbook shoulder check practically right on the Devils blueline – completely clean and 100% legal), but because it occured with roughly fifteen seconds left in a game the Devils were already winning by a score of 2-0. The Hurricanes and the mainstream hockey media questioned Stevens motivation for choosing to play in such an aggressive manner in a game the Devils had all but won, with most concluding that his intent must could not have been anything other than malicious. However, I think Stevens’ motivation is best summed up by a paragraph in an article written about him in Sports Illustrated shortly after the incident occured:

For 19 years Stevens has been playing in a league in which no one takes a knee with a four-goal lead in the final minute, in which the coach doesn’t wave in a right wing to play goal in a blowout, in which garbage time exists only when some fan hurls a D cell toward him. Stevens sees the game in black and white, not in shades of green (like the still maturing rookie, Willis) or gray (like the wizened 38-year-old, Francis). Stevens, 37, plays old-time hockey, not how-much-time-is-on-the-clock hockey.

You can read the entire article at the following link:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1022433/index.htm

Another possible motivation for the hit on Willis could very well have been that Willis, who had gathered the puck off of a bad clearing attempt by Rafalski and caught him badly out of position and could then attempt to skate the puck into the Devils zone on the un-manned right side for a possible scoring chance on Brodeur. The Devils, who had by that time already been much maligned as a team that got by solely on the stinginess of the defensive style of hockey they chose to play, took a sort of spiteful pride in shutting down opposing teams and grinding them into the ground. Rather than give Willis the opportunity to rob Brodeur and the team of another shutout, Stevens decided to play the body, taking Willis out of the play before he ever got the chance to score.

And I don’t know where you got the idea that Stevens hit Francis in a game the Devils already had ‘in the bag,’ because it occurred about halfway into the first period of Game 3. The teams were tied at zero and the Hurricanes had just gone on the power play when Stevens caught Francis skating the puck in along the boards with his head down (am I the only one beginning to notice a common theme here?) going in the opposite direction. While some contend that Stevens left his feet and thus should have been given a penalty for charging at the very least, I’ve watched the video of the several times and believe Stevens left his feet on the follow through of the hit as a result of impact, not before, negating any allegations of charging.

And just as an FYI, there was technically nothing wrong with Doug Weight’s hit on Brandon Sutter. If I remember correctly (and I know that I do), all of the other Islanders were caught in the Hurricanes’ defensive zone when Sutter was sprung in the opposite direction. Weight, the only Islander on the ice that had a viable chance at preventing Sutter from skating in on the Islanders’ undefended goaltender, decided to play the body in a last-ditch effort to bump Sutter off the puck, which was essentially the only option left open to him in that situation. He skated across the ice from left to right with the intent to catch Sutter (who I believe is actually taller than Weight) in the chest with a clean should-check, but at the last minute Sutter seems to have lost whatever tenuous control he had over the puck and inexplicably lurched forward in an attempt to regain it, putting his head down directly in the path of Weight’s shoulder in the process.

According to the rules that currently govern the game, Weight didn’t do anything wrong, but according to the common sense orders hockey coaches have been barking at young players from the time they suit up in their first checking league, Sutter did: “KEEP YOUR HEAD UP!”

by kellyn on Sep 19, 2009 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can call it old time hockey all you want its still dirty. Just because its not against the rules does not make it the thing you have to do. For far too long the NHL has allowed these kind of things to happen. I love how its Stevens winning mentality that allows him leeway to cheap shot guys Yeah I see it black and white too, he is a dirty player) . Lidstrom, Bourque, Leetch, were defense men who were better than SS (and is in Lidstrom’s case) and I never saw them go out of their way to hurt somebody. They get the job done in an all time great way without taking somebody out. We kill Avery for his antics and edgy borderline plays but at the same time whether its Pronger’s flying elbows or Stevens knockout blows that jeopardize people careers, get put on the pedestal of old time hockey. As far as Weight is concerned, I didnt see him slow down when he saw that the player was in a vulnerable position. You can still male the play without taking the guy out. The litany of guys who are getting hurt because of head hits is getting longer every year. For those of you that have not had a concussion let me tell you the after effects continue for a long time. Having had a couple of them in high school and in college playing lacrosse and hockey let me tell you from experience. As a kid I loved roller coasters as an adult I suffer from bouts of vertigo and the last time I was on a roller coaster I almost passed out (all this because somebody felt the need to elbow me and check me intot he board from behind). This is a person were talking about. If you cant make it in the NHL because your play, ok. But when you get taken out because of a cheap shot….. I’m not looking at this with Isles colored glasses either. Bergeron, Connoly, Lindros, the litany of players that have had carers altered and/or shortened is getting longer. We will see what the opinion is once its somebody on your team. I was always thought to respect my opponents on the field or ice. I just hope that for his sake nobody does something to Phaneuf when he is vulnerable. Just because you can take somebody out does not mean you should. The NHL will only do something about this when its somebody like Crosby who gets hurt.

by lostsin44 on Sep 19, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Simple Rules From the Past to Avoid Injuries

1. Goalies stay in your net.
2. If you hit a goalie be aware.
3. Keep your head up at all times.
4. Never turn your back to the ice when going to the boards.
5. Protect your head and knees.
6. Protect your team mates.
There’s probably some others Ican’t recall but those used to be the basics!

by Gordo55 on Sep 18, 2009 3:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I’m down with most of your rules, but:

4. Never turn your back to the ice when going to the boards.

How, exactly, does one avoid that? Skating a detour to the boards? Go directly to the puck. Be mindful that an impact is coming. Count on your fellow player to know not to hit you from behind in the “danger zone” a few feet before from the boards.

I’m not being flippant; I’m serious. I appreciate this discussion. There are a lot of in-game movements that people seldom discuss explicitly, and as a result we rest on generalities that don’t apply to every situation.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rule 4.

I guess it’s more, look over your shoulder don’t go in blindly…now days players go into the boards relying on the rules and equipment to protect them. It’s not like they wear Leatt kneck braces.
It was always against the rules to drive guys into the boards. Fortunately, back in the 60’s the coaches taught use the basic rules of protection aka commonsense. Like I said the coaches need to be more responsiblewith what they teach.
The warning zone is like the visor it gets the kids to let down there guard…they don’t watch for the hit from behind whether accidental or on purpose. Anything close is automatically called even if the guy being hit is at fault.
Same with visors (great idea had a friend lose an eye with Victoria) people wear them and think they’re safe. While the other guys are saying he’s wearing a visor he’ll be okay and they worry less about how they handle there sticks.
They add equipment and rules but players continue to get hit because attention to the basic rules of protection are ignored in training…you know I think we learned those rules, including respect for each other on the backyard and school rinks!

by Gordo55 on Sep 18, 2009 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Gotcha. Awesome. That’s “old-time hockey” talk I can rally behind.

I think you’re right: The equipment feeds a false sense of security, while I believe players are no longer taught how to hit properly. Everybody wants the big WWE hit that creates ooohs and aaaahs, they forget about fundamentals.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 18, 2009 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dirty

I don’t know about leading with the elbow, I think it’s hard to tell with the video personally, but He was jumping.

I find "leaving his feet" to be the most overused and inaccurate indicator of the dirtiness of a hit. It’s the +/- of dirtiness.

No where in the rule book is "leaving your feet" in there, in fact the word used is "jumping". Last time I checked jumping didn’t start when you left your feet, it starts when you start decompressing your legs in order to jump.

In other words it’s possible to be jumping into a player before you actually leave your feet. Which is exactly what Phaneuf did here. It was charging, and probably deserved at least a major and game misconduct.

The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Sep 18, 2009 5:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

PS.

If anyone wants a better description of what I mean, i have a whole post about it, with free body diagrams and everything (seriously!).

The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Sep 18, 2009 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

gaaahhh

Try this link instead

The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Sep 18, 2009 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha, jumping starts when you leave your feet.

Bending your knees to make a hit is not jumping, or anywhere near it. The phrase “jumping” is meant to penalize flying wrecking-ball style hits where you jump into the air and “leave your feet”. Bending your knees and exploding through a hit is what you’re taught to do, no matter where you’re hitting someone, on the boards or in the middle of the ice.

by Biebs on Sep 18, 2009 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bending your knees to make a hit is not jumping, or anywhere near it. The phrase "jumping" is meant to penalize flying wrecking-ball style hits where you jump into the air and "leave your feet". Bending your knees and exploding through a hit is what you’re taught to do, no matter where you’re hitting someone, on the boards or in the middle of the ice.

I didn’t say a player couldn’t bend his legs, being stiff legged would be stupid and unreasonable. I’m not arguing against not bending your knees, I’m arguing that when a player uses the power to push upwards that he’s in the process of jumping. If he’s pushing forwards, it’s a clean hit.

Phaneuf was most certainly pushing upwards with his legs. It’s charging.

The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Sep 18, 2009 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But you’re equating bending your knees and pushing through a hit with cannon-balling through the air and hitting someone with no contact with the ice. In your blog you say

Getting airborne is to jumping as cruising at altitude is to flying an airplane. I don’t think anyone would get on a plane with a pilot who knew how to cruise, but not take off or land. Somehow the “taking off” part of jumping is ignored in these violent hits.
which, a) is a total logical fallacy , b) apples and oranges, c) completely irrelevant to the reality of this incident.

by Biebs on Sep 18, 2009 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How exactly is it a logical fallacy? and how is it an inappropriate metaphor?

The key thing to look at here is not whether Phaneuf was airborne before the hit, but would he have gotten airborne had he missed. If he would have gotten airborne even if he missed, he was jumping.

And he most certainly would have left the ice had he missed Okopso, ergo he was jumping.

The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Sep 18, 2009 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s covered by Irrelevant Conclusion (diverts attention away from a fact in dispute rather than address it directly) in that Phaneuf DID hit him, and did not leave his feet before he made contact. You can’t say that if he missed, he would have ended up jumping. In fact, just by saying that if he missed he jumped, you’re agreeing that since he didn’t miss he didn’t jump.

by Biebs on Sep 18, 2009 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Flatulence. The majority of your arguments are flatulence. plain and simple. A clean hit is a hit that you would not complain about an opposing player putting on YOUR teams star. Alternatively, a dirty hit is one that you NEVER want to see happen to YOUR team. Swap the jerseys on the two players, and then tell me how you call it.

It’s covered by Irrelevant Conclusion (diverts attention away from a fact in dispute rather than address it directly)

Is somebody is trying to justify that money spent on college?
In fact, just by saying that if he missed he jumped, you’re agreeing that since he didn’t miss he didn’t jump.

Um… you might want to read the first line of your post…

See Dom, THIS is why I could never be a ref, I would be more interested in beating the offender down myself than in separating them.

SHOOOOOOOT IT!!!! Anon

by burpchelischili on Sep 19, 2009 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

in that Phaneuf DID hit him, and did not leave his feet before he made contact.

Which, again, is not in the rule book and is not a complete description of jumping. Furthermore you’re using a circular argument. You’re saying my analogy is bad because the hit was clean, and the hit is clean because my analogy is bad (yet you’ve failed to even remotely counter my point or describe why my analogy is actually bad.)

In fact, just by saying that if he missed he jumped, you’re agreeing that since he didn’t miss he didn’t jump.

Well you’re putting words in my mouth, but missing my argument completely. I’m saying that jumping is more than just leaving the air, and that Phaneuf was in the act of jumping as he was hitting Okospo, therefore charging.

If I’m getting this straight your counterpoint to my argument has been:

a) jumping doesn’t start until a person leaves there feet, and that everything before that is not jumping

b) My analogy isn’t great (which you fail to actually provide any logic behind), which completely invalidates the meat of the argument

c) that it’s not the act of jumping if something touches you before your feet leave the ground

All three of those arguments defy any reasonable logic that they are beyond preposterous. My argument is that jumping starts the moment someone starts moving upwards with enough force to leave the ground, not when the person actually leaves the ground, and that Phaneuf was doing this. Provide a logical counter-argument to this, and stop “diverting attention away from a fact”

The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Sep 19, 2009 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m with you Dom. Too often we’re seeing hits where the player leads with the arm away from his body. Maybe not necessarily with the elbow, but an awful lot of times, on the back of your upper arm, right above the elbow, and the whole solid flat of the back of your upper arm, is what’s being drilled through a lot of guys’ faces nowadays. It’s almost like the “rip” action from football, as a you try to break through a block by chopping your arm upward to break the blocker’s hands off of you. I don’t think that belongs in hockey. Get the arm against your side when you make the hit.

http://sacrificethebody.blogspot.com/
Sacrifice the Body - Examining the NHL through statistical analysis, reasoned thought, and blind conjecture.

by IAmJoe on Sep 18, 2009 11:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The other video

I added to this post the Flames official site’s promotional video of the hit, which had another angle or two. Not surprisingly, it only reinforces my view.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 19, 2009 9:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm coninced

I couldn’t tell at first, but using the Flames feed it’s pretty obvious:

Yeah, not only was he jumping, he led with his elbow.

The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Sep 20, 2009 2:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Convinced*

damn spelling

The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Sep 20, 2009 2:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha, oh typos, always getting in the way of a lagrer point. :-)

Nice shots. Thanks for those and for all your contributions to the court. Phaneuf sentencing will begin shortly…

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 20, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think beer actually got in the way.

And just know, whenever Phaneuf does something douchey, I will be there to call him on it.

The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Sep 20, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sir, I will not have you libel beer on this blog.

Beers don’t cause typos. People who love beer cause typos.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Sep 20, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As an added point, I have decided to change his name to Phadouche. It is easier to remember how to spell.

SHOOOOOOOT IT!!!! Anon

by burpchelischili on Sep 20, 2009 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And it’s what the members of Mile High Hockey already call him…

The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Sep 20, 2009 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I knew there was something good about them!

SHOOOOOOOT IT!!!! Anon

by burpchelischili on Sep 20, 2009 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

shoot

yeah. the effects of booze my friends! :)

by penis enarging on Nov 12, 2009 8:07 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip surgery not required.
Start posting about the Islanders »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Featured Poll

Poll
Who is your first pick for defense on the Islanders 2000s All-Decade Team?
Hamrlik - Most points tops the list
26 votes
Jonsson - An all-around threat and reminder of some good times
210 votes
Aucoin - Was here for less time, but man that cannon racked up points
88 votes
Streit - A recent addition, but top-drawer two-way quality
58 votes
Witt - A vote for "the Warrior" for time served and blood shed
26 votes
Martinek - Most games played (really!) and symbolizes the ups and downs of the whole decade
17 votes

425 votes | Poll has closed

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New Jersey 58 36 20 2 74
Pittsburgh 59 35 22 2 72
Philadelphia 57 29 25 3 61
New York Rangers 59 26 26 7 59
New York Islanders 58 23 27 8 54

(updated 2.9.2010 at 9:00 AM EST)

New York Islanders Roster

# Pos. DOB W H
Sean Bergenheim 20 LW 2/8/1984 205 5-10
Blake Comeau 57 RW 2/18/1986 207 6-1
Rick DiPietro 39 G 9/19/1981 210 6-1
Bruno Gervais 8 D 10/3/1984 205 6-1
Trent Hunter 7 RW 7/5/1980 210 6-3
Dustin Kohn 56 D 2/2/1987 200 6-2
Andrew MacDonald 47 D 9/7/1986 188 6-1
Freddy Meyer 44 D 1/4/1981 192 5-10
Matt Moulson 26 LW 11/1/1983 206 6-1
Frans Nielsen 51 C 4/24/1984 172 5-11
Kyle Okposo 21 RW 4/16/1988 200 6-1
Richard Park 10 RW 5/27/1976 190 5-11
Dwayne Roloson 30 G 10/12/1969 180 6-1
Rob Schremp 13 C 7/1/1986 200 5-11
Jon Sim 16 LW 9/29/1977 195 5-10
Mark Streit 2 D 12/11/1977 197 6-0
Andy Sutton 25 D 3/10/1975 245 6-6
Jeff Tambellini 15 LW 4/13/1984 186 5-11
John Tavares 91 C 9/20/1990 195 6-0
Doug Weight 93 C 1/21/1971 196 5-11

Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein