NHL bottom: What 70 points gets you since the lockout
The guessing has begun here about how many points the Islanders might put up this season, and where such a figure will put them. Will they hit at least 70 points, a minimum nine-point improvement? Barring repeat health disasters, I'd think so -- which would probably still be good for a lottery shot at the #1 draft pick. More than that? 76? We'll see.
And if they're in the 70+ range, where does that put them in terms of lottery position next June? (Not to speak of the gallows before this season is even born, but...) To look at it another way, how many teams could the Islanders leapfrog this year? Post-lockout history says one NHL team is likely to bottom out -- to do what the Isles did last year and Philadelphia and St. Louis did previously, and not even make 70 points. Meanwhile, the other bottom five to seven teams typically finish somewhere between the high 60s to high 70s.
Will that be the case this year, or will it be like 2007-08, when the 29th and 30th place teams (the Lightning and Kings) each had 71 points, while the 24th and 25th place teams (Columbus and Toronto) actually eclipsed 80 points with OTL-tainted near-".500" records? If you're thinking ahead, speculating about who the Isles can pass and where they might finish, a look at the worst finishes since the lockout might help. Those historic standings -- and some questions -- after the jump...
| 2005-06 | 2006-07 | |||||
| STL | 21-46-15 | 57 | PHI | 22-48-12 | 56 | |
| PIT | 22-46-14 | 58 | PHX | 31-46-5 | 67 | |
| CHI | 26-43-13 | 65 | LA | 27-41-14 | 68 | |
| WAS | 29-41-12 | 70 | WAS | 31-42-9 | 70 | |
| BOS | 29-37-16 | 74 | CHI | 31-42-9 | 71 | |
| CBS | 35-43-4 | 74 | EDM | 32-43-7 | 71 | |
| NYI | 36-40-6 | 78 | CBS | 33-42-7 | 73 | |
| 2007-08 | 2008-09 | |||||
| TB | 31-42-9 | 71 | NYI | 26-47-9 | 61 | |
| LA | 32-43-7 | 71 | TB | 24-40-18 | 66 | |
| ATL | 34-40-8 | 76 | COL | 32-45-5 | 69 | |
| STL | 33-36-13 | 79 | ATL | 35-41-6 | 76 | |
| NYI | 35-38-9 | 79 | LAK | 34-37-7 | 79 | |
| CBS | 34-36-12 | 80 | PHX | 36-37-11 | 79 | |
| TOR | 36-35-11 | 83 | TOR | 34-35-13 | 81 | |
It's wildly early to speculate, but do you have a number in mind? And if you do, what rank do you think that will be good for? Without having more than a lick of training camp to go on, I'm betting they finish in the 70s, and they pass at least two teams. They're still in a tough division, though, and the East's other bottom-feeders seem better off than last year, so for me to bet on more than that will take some convincing. Stake your claim now, or ... wait until the next injury.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m hoping for a good early half, with them surprising people who were used to taking nights off. I want them to stay somewhere from 10th to 12th in the confrence until the Trade deadline comes up and we trade Weight and Biron among others.
Hopefully the Isles end up in the bottom 5 or so, but I think most people would agree that with Tavares we have a possible superstar, and could really use a top ranked Dman prospect.
I’d think there is 6 definite playoff teams in the East. A lot of the other teams have had a lot of turnover or their own struggles. Hell, even Broduer is starting to look a little shaky.
I think the Isles can hit 80 points this year. They had 61 last year… if you add in that they can’t possibly be as injured as they were last year, there’s at least six more points. Throw in at least four more based on the fact that they’ve got real goalies this year. And I’d give eight points to the young guys playing better and gaining experience. Even 80 points would be a 19-point improvement, and that’s very difficult to achieve. But I think the Isles are capable of getting there, not to mention being a serious spoiler in the second half.
In considering this, I was as scientific as my addled brain can manage. If you bump up our guys last year’s production between 10-15%, add in 25 goals for JT, and reduce last year’s GA 10-15% and match it against teams in that range for 2008-09, we would be between 75-85 points. Then if you subtract 10 points for the blowback due to deadline deals, we are between 65 and 75 points. Based on this year’s standings, that puts us in either the #2 or #3 spot for the lottery—or, in other words, it gives us a decent chance to win the Taylor Hall sweepstakes.
I would still rather hit 100 this year.
SHOOOOOOOT IT!!!! Anon
by burpchelischili on Sep 17, 2009 6:28 AM EDT reply actions
I think 85 is probably the upper limit…unless we are on course for 85 at the deadline and Garth goes buy crazy and brings in some talent instead of selling. Even then, 90-95 would probably be as high as we would go.
Can’t blame a chili for hoping.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
My thought is with Garth. He has said he is not focused on winning, but on doing what he needs to do to move the development process along as fast as possible and as well as possible. In aperfect storm, it could happen that we are in the mix in late February and he decides to go for it. It probably is better, however, if he focuses on player development, trades away as many draft pick worthy veterans as he can, and sets the team up through the draft, trades, and FA to begin competing in 2010-11.
If it wasn’t clear, I am fully on board with this approach, too. Just joining in chelischili’s feigned optimism.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
Just joining in chelischili’s feigned optimism.
Not feigned, just over the top,and overly biased dream.
SHOOOOOOOT IT!!!! Anon
by burpchelischili on Sep 19, 2009 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions

by 







































