Another Possible Deadline Day Pot o' Gold
It's Dustin Byfuglien Day! (via italicsquirrel)
Most seemed to pan my idea of the possibility of obtaining Patrick Sharp at the deadline. While I don't think that it's as out of the question as some have made it sound, I do agree that it would be very hard for the Blackhawks to replace what Sharp gives them.
Here is another thought:
A possible trade that Chicago would love and that would, I think, also work for the Isles: Christobal Huet, Dustin Byfuglien, and Jordan Hendry for Andy Sutton and Martin Biron. The Isles then trade Dwayne Roloson as well as Doug Weight for picks, shedding significant salary to compensate for taking on Huet’s and Byfuglien’s cap hits. In the short term, the Isles actually save some cap space. Of course, depending on what the plan was for Sutton, the cap hit goes up for next year.
In return, however, we get a fearsome presence on our top line who should make it much easier for Kyle and Josh to score as well as getting garbage goals of his own. By the time Huet’s contract is up in 2012, Mikko should be more than ready, so DP’s status will become irrelevant with this trade. And Hendry is a good, young dependable defender who will not cost much. I might prefer Niklas Hjalmarsson, but Chicago might not be as ready to part with him.
For Chicago, especially if they pull off the Campbell-Rozsival deal suggested by ESPN, their cap problems would be over without hurting their product on the ice at all as either Beach or Skille would fill Byfuglien's place nicely. If they sign Biron at his former $3.5 mil and Sutton at maybe $1.5 mil, that will chop $4.3 mil off and the Campbell-Rozsival deal would cut another $2.1 for a total of $6.4 mil. If Bowman, Jr. cannot sort out Chicago’s cap issues with a $6.4 mil cushion, he should give the job back to Tallon.
Submitted FanPosts do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog or SB Nation. If you're reading this statement, you pass the fine print legalese test. Four stars for you.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Byfuglien
Heh, I think Hugo mentioned this in the Sharp post, but we actually went a few rounds on this earlier in the summer. (Damn the slow summer news cycle.)
He’s an enticing target. I’m still of the opinion I’d gladly take a flyer on him now, but only if our compensation was the fact we’re giving them cap space — not for any significant (and necessarily lower-salaried) assets. Basically, I’d play hardball with Chicago and be prepared to walk away. He could be a big piece of the puzzle; he could be a disappointment (which is why Chicago would consider moving him).
Under that stance, though, Sutton does nothing for them but give them heavy salary back. And Huet: Would they dump him for Biron for pure cap savings alone? Interesting question, with a risk: The same playoff questions exist about Biron as they do about Huet … Biron’s just a much more payroll-friendly question mark.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
Sutton is only 1/2 mil more than Byfuglien currently and Hendry’s salary would more than wash that. The big difference, of course, is between Huet’s $5.625 mil and Biron’s $1.4 mil.
There are several reasons Chicago makes this trade. One, of course, is that they have total flexibility. They would be free to walk away from both Biron and Sutton at the end of the season and would be free to structure the team anyway they choose. If they decide to keep them, they are obviously in the driver’s seat as to what they pay them and how long a contract they offer.
Sutton gives them the big, physical, and experienced defender they want. Biron not only frees them from the Huet contract albatross. I happen to think that he is a better goalie than Huet and not as injury prone.
Finally, as mentioned, Chicago can readily replace Byfuglien with Beach or Skille. They have improved their defense in two areas without hurting their offense appreciably and they have solved their cap problems.
As for the Isles, neither player was likely to be on our roster for 2010-11 anyway. Byfuglien gives us a physical presence we need on our top line and he can play defense too if needed. Hendry is a promising young defender who will give our system more depth. The only wild card is Huet. This will be a lot easier to do if DP is back and has played in 20-30 games and Koskinnen seems ready for a callup. Then Huet is just insurance. In fact, he might become trade-bait next year if all goes well. It might get a little scary if it looks like we will need to rely on him.
BTW, check out Muir’s power rankings on CNNSI. He says Garth made a mistake in signing Marty and Roly because we’’ll win some more games and miss out on another #1 overall pick!!! Or at least with better than a #4 overall where he has us now!!!
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/allan_muir/08/14/summer.rankings/index.html
To paraphrase Rodney, Take My Buff… Please!
SHOOOOOOOT IT!!!! Anon
by burpchelischili on Aug 25, 2009 5:26 AM EDT reply actions
I think trading Roloson at the deadline this year is unrealistic – as he’s on a 2 year contract at a starters salary and is getting old fast. That and please, please, please don’t acquire Huet. You want Byfuglien if you can get him cheap, otherwise I would pass – his apparently questionably lazy attitude on ice seems to detract from him fitting into the Gordon system very well and hence taking a bigger chance on him.
But then this just reflects my general opinion that the Isles need to be opportunistic at this point rather than higher pro-active in finding the ‘missing pieces’ as not enough of the core is set. Also, if the salary cap comes down significantly, there is a good chance of getting good value from other teams squeezed or utilising the extra cap space that the Isles have in order to attract the right free-agents to Long Island.
Then again, who knows what Garth will do.
But then this just reflects my general opinion that the Isles need to be opportunistic at this point rather than higher pro-active in finding the ‘missing pieces’ as not enough of the core is set.
True, I’ve got to remind myself that. No need to rush, plus by deadline time, it should be clearer whether (and by how much) revenues and the cap will decline, so we’ll have a better idea of what’s for sale in March and what might be for sale or bought out in June.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
A team looking for a reliable backup might trade a pick for Roly. What’s wrong with Huet for two years? He’s not Luongo, but he should be reasonably solid and by the time his contract is up, Mikko should be ready. Where have you read about Byfuglien being lazy? He is young enough to be part of the core and could be a Gillies type who would open up the ice for JT, KO, and JB. And he can play defense if needed. There’s nothing wrong with being proactive when it will improve the team.
Scoring
The Islanders need a real scoring threat like this guy, and he will lead them to a playoff spot.
didn't read the above
Is Biron better than Huet though?

by 
































