Grading the Islanders: Tim Jackman
Just as an FYI, we're going through these Islanders report cards in alphabetical order, but we're only doing guys who were regulars on the 2008-09 squad. Next up, then, is Tim Jackman. The purpose is absolutely to get your impressions and opinions on a given player, but each of these posts will have my run-down just to get you jogging your memory.
If you're on the front page of the site, the poll (your numeric report card) shows up before the rest of the post. Click "continue reading this story" (after the poll) for the Jackman stats and verbal run-down...
Random Fact: It's easily forgotten, but this is actually Jackman's fourth NHL team. He played a total of 32 NHL games with Columbus, Phoenix and Los Angeles between 2003 and 2007.
"This is our concern, Dude" Fact: If you're into advanced stats: Despite his defensive role, at even strength Jackman had the second-lowest performance rating (-.82) among regular Islanders forwards (only Jeff Tambellini was lower at -1.07), despite playing against the weakest quality of competition outside of Dean McAmmond and Jon Sim. (Note: Generally, these ratings are based on tabulating how many 5-on-5 goals per 60 minutes are scored for and against your team while you are on and off the ice, which -- unlike +/- -- helps control for variations in ice time, the quality of your linemates and the quality of the opponents you skate against.)
The Story: Normally I try not to load these evaluative posts with my own bias, but in this case I'll tip my hand (more obviously than usual): I didn't expect much at all from Tim Jackman last season, but in the end I was immensely impressed by him combining a competent fourth-line role and team-high 151 hits with the courage to be the team's de facto enforcer. I actually observed this before I heard Billy Jaffe say it, but Jaffe's late-season remark went something like this: "Does anyone do more with fewer minutes on this team than Tim Jackman?" I'm not sure. Among Islanders forwards not named Mitch or Joel, he by far got the lowest ice time from Scott Gordon.
The Good: Depending on your expectations, 12 points and a slight display of hands in limited opportunity may have been a bonus. For me, it was his willingness to drop the gloves with anyone, at any time, despite not coming into this league as a billed enforcer. There is an element of "anything to keep my job" in this; there is also an element of bad-ass courage and the respect of teammates, given the Islanders lack of a full-time fighter.
The Bad: Absent the valued willingness to step up and defend his teammates, isn't he just a replaceable part? By the same rating system at Behind the Net, his 4-on-5 (penalty kill) performance was far from best among regular Islanders forwards. Frans Nielsen, Kyle Okposo, and even Blake Comeau (among others) rated higher -- though they are undoubtedly better hockey players, so that's no surprise and perhaps unfair.
The Poem:
He wolfs down aggressors like Pac-Man
The fourth-line forward, Tim Jackman
A pinch of PK and such
His ice time ain't much
But teammates are thrilled he's got their back, man.
The Grade: Per usual, this is for you to vote your "grade" (and comment) on how you think Tim Jackman did in 2008-09, relative to your preseason expectations. As mentioned, I sort of tipped my hand because I expected nothing from him. But even if you're in that boat, you may not value what he did as anything but average (or below or above). A 3 is as you expected; you know the rest.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
Could be a later bloomer, surprising that he was a former 2nd round pick. 07-08 was his best AHL season point wise and played 20 less games. This has to be his last chance to catch on with a team considering how horrible Phoenix/Columbus/LA have been and none of them kept him around.
by WebBard on Aug 20, 2009 1:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I really liked the hitting and toughness he brought to the fourth line. And even though he’s a punching bag, I respect the willingness to drop ‘em and play sheriff every now and again; it’s nice having a guy who can convey that attitude + and still play his “energy” role reasonably well.
I’d say he moderately exceeded the expectations I had of him coming into the season, so I’ll give him a “3” – he played his role well.
by pickups on Aug 20, 2009 1:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
even though he’s a punching bag, I respect the willingness to drop ‘em and play sheriff every now and again
Heh, indeed. That willingness isn’t quantifiable, but it sure makes an impression. Wasn’t there an anecdote from practice sometime last season about he (and another Islander, I think) getting some fighting pointers from a former enforcer (Cairns?)? Maybe he’ll have some better bouts this year.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
by Dominik on Aug 20, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I gave him a three this time, but I am hoping for bigger things this year.
SHOOOOOOOT IT!!!! Anon
by burpchelischili on Aug 21, 2009 4:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So YOU weren’t the 1 nor the 5 this time? :)
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
by Dominik on Aug 21, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nope, but I gritted my teeth immediately when I saw them. I just knew that the ranger fan wasn’t going to leave a word. If he did I would have asked him to drive Patrick Kane somewhere, you just know a ranger fan would demand a tip.
SHOOOOOOOT IT!!!! Anon
by burpchelischili on Aug 21, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you just know a ranger fan would demand a tip.
… and have a history of revoked licenses.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
by Dominik on Aug 21, 2009 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



























