(New) Gaming the Goon Gambit
Are hockey fights such as the one above between Witter and Boston's Milan Lucic going the way of the Dodo in the new NHL? Perhaps not. But the old fashioned pure goon-enforcer types whose sole value is to go out and drop the gloves usually with the opponent's goon ARE rapidly becoming a thing of the past. The premium placed on skill by the new rules and cap limits is seeing to that.
In his book The New Game: How Hockey Saved Itself (Toronto: Viking Canada, 2007), Steve Paikin writes:
Are hockey fights such as the one above between Witter and Boston's Milan Lucic going the way of the Dodo in the new NHL? Perhaps not. But the old fashioned pure goon-enforcer types whose sole value is to go out and drop the gloves usually with the opponent's goon ARE rapidly becoming a thing of the past. The premium placed on skill by the new rules and cap limits is seeing to that.
In his book The New Game: How Hockey Saved Itself (Toronto: Viking Canada, 2007), Steve Paikin writes:
In the old game, there was always a place for a player who couldn't score goals but knew how to drop the gloves and beat his opponent's brains in. Not in the new game. Those one-trick ponies now have an almost permanent seat in the press box or are losing their jobs altogether.
I heartily recommend Paikin's book. It is a superb introduction into the new NHL. As he observes, NHL franchises simply cannot afford to keep an enforcer on the roster unless he has a redeeming talent. He has to be able to help the club in other ways. The day of defenders clutching, grabbing, interfering, etc. with opposing forwards is also gone. The new rules have seen to that as well.
Now this may seem passe to some, but many Islander fans have panicked as Eastern Conference teams like the Leafs, the Flyers, the Rangers, and even the Capitols have signed big physical players. The fear has been that not only will these players intimidate John Tavares and throw him off his game. It has also been that he may suffer a crippling injury.
These fears are misguided. First, there are ways to "protect" Tavares without bringing in new faces. With a modest bulking up, Tavares will be about the same size as Sid and former great Phil Esposito (to whom he compares himself ). Also, if he is placed on a line with Trent Hunter and newcomer Matt Moulson (or perhaps Jesse Joensuu) and either Brendan Witt or Andy Sutton is sent on the ice during his shift, that will give the Islanders more than enough physical presence to discourage cheap shots.
Second, and more important, the most effective way to "protect" Tavares is NOT by adding enforcers to the Islander roster. It is by adding players who will improve our powerplay. If it becomes clear that being shorthanded against the Islanders will likely result in a goal against, opposing squads will be VERY reluctant to make cheap hits on Tavares.
Such a player is, in fact, available. Anton Babchuk apparently no longer fits into Carolina's plans and they are prepared to let him go back to Russia to play in the KHL. If, however, Garth offered them a third round pick (we have two for 2010) and offered him a one or two year deal for between $1 million and $1.5 million, Babchuk could become an Islander and our second unit powerplay quarterback.
Babchuk produced comparable offensive numbers to our #1 powerplay quarterback, Mark Streit and his plus / minus was far better than Streit's. He is a bit of a diamond in the rough, but Coach Gordon and his assistant Dean Chynoweth are gifted at developing young talent--especially defensemen. And, of course, Streit would make a superb mentor. There is a need for another defender on the Islander roster and Babchuk seems a perfect fit. Hopefully this gets done.
There are a number of variables that will determine how competitive the Islanders will be this season. Chief among them may well be DP's ability to return and play effectively. The building of a potent line around John Tavares and greatly improved play from developing players like Okposo, Bailey, and Bergenheim are also critical. Another vital factor will be whether the Islanders can develop an effective powerplay. Adding Babchuk could be the key to a successful season.
Submitted FanPosts do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog or SB Nation. If you're reading this statement, you pass the fine print legalese test. Four stars for you.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
Interesting. Thanks for the book rec’. I’ve hoped since the new CBA that the cap (and subtle rule changes that don’t penalize fighting so heavily) would gradually eliminate one-trick enforcers and leave room for guys who can actually play also fill the enforcement role, like the old old days.
I think the “deter them with a lethal power play” gambit works more for an elite team like Detroit, but a team like the Isles is going to be in a lot of situations where, lethal PP or no, teams are still going to take liberties. That said, I tend to agree it’s more important that guys who will actually be on the ice with Tavares (like Witt/Sutton, etc.) actually step up and have everyone’s back. (In other words, would I waste $1 million-plus on a “name” enforcer who can’t play hockey? No. Give that low-minute spot to a young guy who doesn’t already feel entitled to the role.)
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
by Dominik on Aug 17, 2009 11:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think that initially some will attempt to take liberties, but if the officials are vigilant (and in Tavares’ case, I am quite certain they will be) and the Isles start scoring PP goals with frequency, teams will back off and give him and his linemates more space. And if the opposing blueliners are forced back on their heels just a little bit, that will be all the opening JT needs to start scoring goals by the bucketful. I also think that this could be a breakout season for Hunts and that Moulson could star if given the chance. If that line becomes dangerous, opposing teams will have to match their shutdown pairing against it. And that should make things much easier for Kyle and Josh.
Players like Laracque and Brashear are definitely a dying breed. I do wonder, as the Isles become more competitive, how long the Rechlisz experiment will continue. Interesting that back in the glory years, the Isles never had a goon type. Our enforcers (Gillies, Nystrom, Lane, Howatt) were all talented hockey players.
by BCISLEMAN on Aug 17, 2009 12:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Paikin describes it in detail pp. 17-23.
by BCISLEMAN on Aug 17, 2009 3:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I just don’t like a player that will “take his puck and go home” if he isn’t made happy.
SHOOOOOOOT IT!!!! Anon
by burpchelischili on Aug 18, 2009 5:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If you are referring to Babchuk, it simply isn’t the case at all. The Canes decided that he wasn’t part of their future, benched him for the playoffs, traded for another defenseman, and then refused to pay him what he was worth.
by BCISLEMAN on Aug 18, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I figure guys like Babchuk to be the ones you grab as puzzle pieces
Not really right for a team that’s rebuilding though.
Think of it this way if we were using something like the nursing process to figure out what we need.
Assess
Analyze
Diagnose
Plan
Implement
Evaluate.
Right now this team is at the Assess and Analyze phase of things. You really need a good 2-3 seasons of that before going out and grabbing throwaway players like Babchuck. That’s when you’re more that the diagnose- evaluation stage of the building process.
We don’t know what we really have here yet in terms of where some of these guys are going to excel and what their limitations are.
by Chickendirt on Aug 27, 2009 3:30 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Sweet. You not only whipped out nursing to address the rebuilding process, but it made sense. This rocks.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
by Dominik on Aug 27, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't you tell I'm prepping up for my boards?
LOL
by Chickendirt on Aug 27, 2009 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoa, good luck. Those don’t sound so fun.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
by Dominik on Aug 28, 2009 3:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you have to look at the reason he’s a throwaway. They offered $1 mil and he refused too, so he’s not entirely a throwaway. They elected to pass on him BECAUSE he is a bit of a developmental project who could become a star but needs some work. Our new assistant coach and—come to think of it—our head coach were hired precisely to get the full potential out of promising young talent like Babchuk. Again, I would not go too crazy. If he accepts $1.5 mil for one year and Rutherford accepts a third round pick, fine. If not, walk away.
by BCISLEMAN on Aug 27, 2009 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





























