With each jersey foul, a piece of me dies
I used to see NHL jerseys as sacred: Historical markers that record the stories, figures and trades of our day. Actually, screw that -- I still see them (pre-Reebok Edge, anyway) as sacred. The weight. The feel. The horizontal stripes. The fonts and numeric styles. The reminders of which guys played where.
I suppose I thought the cost of customization was enough to deter anyone from making too big of a joke of them. Minimum $150 for a 69 jersey (huh huh) is a lot of beer money down the drain. But I clearly underestimate the disposable income of the NHL fan, and how much he's willing to spend on a joke.
So part of me looks at Puck Daddy's "Jersey Foul" series like a carwreck -- it's hard to look away, but it's a damned tragedy nonetheless. A little piece of me dies with each faux pas. I reach for the mind bleach.
Anachronisms are almost worse than total joke jerseys because they have that "almost real, but sadly no" feel to them. Like implants. Or fat-free Pringles. Natural's not in it.
So this, from Puck Daddy's latest Jersey Fouls episode, disturbs me greatly:
... as does this:
Now, Gretzky is "The Great One" and all. The league even short-sightedly forced all teams to retire his number. Yada yada. But not only was he never a Leaf -- he absolutely tormented them in 1993, in a way that still haunts Toronto fans. Unless you're an opposition fan (and again, then you have a bigger disposable income question), why would you do this? Would a Philadelphia fan put "NYSTROM 23" on a Flyers jersey? Would a D.C. fan put "LAFONTAINE 16" on a Caps jersey? (I know, I know, most cheeky Ovechkin worshipers are too young to remember Bob Mason...)
Then you have the Tavares thing. I don't know if Tavares will ever wear an Islanders jersey, but if he does, hopefully it's not in that design. Hopefully it's in the classic royal blue threads, after a version of this year's retro-third goes to its rightful full-time role.
But still, what's the rush? Why not wait? The Islanders are now a frightening four points out of 29th -- and even in 30th place their chance at the #1 is still only 48.2%. Assuming the Islanders will have Tavares is like Leafs fans assuming they would have won Game 6 (or hell, Game 7) in 1993's Campbell Conference final if Gretzky had been thrown out after his high stick -- and then gone on to beat the Cup-winning Canadiens (who downed the team that downed the Leafs, after all). It's possible, sure. But it's not even a 50/50 chance. I sure wouldn't bet $150 on it.
And these are just the historical inaccuracies. As always, for much worse matters of jersey taste, follow that Puck Daddy link. If you dare.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Appalling
I’m just in awe at the shear ignorance and stupidity of some fans. Let’s get this straight: WE HAVE A LESS THAN 50% CHANCE OF GETTING THE NUMBER 1 PICK! And even that’s dependent on how this young, hungry group of guys plays out the last 18 or so.
Also, don’t forget that if Snow is “rebuilding” as he truly seems to be, don’t count out that he’d take Hedman (a cornerstone blueliner) over the sexy scorer in Tavares. I just have hope that Garth wants to put butts in the seats and with JT’s adamant denial on Pierre LeBrun’s blog yesterday, that Tavares is Long Island bound.
From the Penalty Box to the Blog Box! Check it out at IslesOfficialsOutlook.com!
I know, it’s downright scary, people counting on him. June will be a ridiculous month.
… Wait, that’s you in the Tavares jersey, isn’t it?!
Lighthouse Hockey: SBN's New York Islanders blog with hip issues.
Honestly – to each their own no matter how irritating or ridiculous it seems. In the end, they are spending money on NHL merchandise during tough economic times. I say let em do whatever.
Islesblogger is a contributor to Lighthouse Hockey: SBN's New York Islanders blog who's lost the most man games to injury.
by Michael Schuerlein on Mar 10, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh sure, go ahead and be reasonable about it. This is no time for cooler heads!
Lighthouse Hockey: SBN's New York Islanders blog with hip issues.
Considering we can’t wear jersey’s to the games the answer is a resounding NO. LOL
For perspective, the only two jersey’s that I would wear to a game are the 25th Anniversary with the waves on the shoulders and bottom with the Lighthouse should patch or my prized 1979-1980 Home White Mitchell and Ness Vintage Jersey with the Lake Placid 1980 shoulder patch. For the vintage jersey I’m getting it done up Bossy style because it’s only right and could never be on “Jersey Foul”.
From the Penalty Box to the Blog Box! Check it out at IslesOfficialsOutlook.com!
by IslesOfficial on Mar 10, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Great success!
… and I was just about to tell you to hyperlink your blog in your signature. :)
Lighthouse Hockey: SBN's New York Islanders blog with hip issues.
Very nice, how much?
Islesblogger is a contributor to Lighthouse Hockey: SBN's New York Islanders blog who's lost the most man games to injury.
by Michael Schuerlein on Mar 10, 2009 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Gah
I meant to comment earlier but you’re right. Gretzky just absolutely killed Leafs fans. Even if there was a deal in place to sign him no good fan should have that jersey. It’s not even the one he would have worn if he had been a Leaf.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Happy ending / addendum - post-draft edition
Thanks to a little sporting come-uppance from the fan in question — with the lottery and the draft now over — Puck Daddy has done a little mea culpa for pointing this Tavares “foul” out.
In that spirit, I’ve re-opened comments to this post. As Fletch said (in Fletch Lives … yeah, I’m goin’ there): “It takes a big man to admit when he’s wrong. … I am not a big man.”
It’s great that this worked out, and I love that this fan contacted the Puck Daddy blog to bring this up again. I stand by my original fears, though. (And I still would have gone with the retro third!)
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by 
































