Maple Leafs 3, Islanders 2: Tavares-led comeback erased by...Blake!
The first period looked like a repeat of the Roloson Miracle game, except with Dwayne not in the mood to play God again. (He was good, he just wasn't 58-save good.)
The second period was a wash -- the Islanders entered and exited down 2-0, with each team thinking it had reason for a better return.
But the third period, aided by a period-opening powerplay: Now that was a different story. The John Tavares Machine was fully operational, working from JT's office to the side of the crease, and the Islanders comeback was in effect. Tied up with five minutes to go, we just might steal another point or two in Toronto.
Then Jason Blake scored and fist-pumped and that was that.
Game Sum. | Event Sum. | Recaps: nhl.com | Isles official
But man if this game didn't give us some things to think about, in the napkin-sketching, roster-mixing kind of way. Take Tim Jackman out and you lose your de facto enforcer, but you get the chance to add another powerplay piece like Rob Schremp, who did not disappoint in that role ... and who held his own centering the 4th-line in limited minutes (9:30 total, 2:44 on the PP).
Kyle Okposo got the (quite beautiful) first assist on both Tavares goals, but the second assist was legitimately credited to Jeff Tambellini on the first and Schremp on the second. The powerplay actually looked functional.
Meanwhile, Schremp's 9:30 TOI was more than Josh Bailey, who ended up with a paltry 8:15 (just 0:23 on the PP). Bailey was also 0-5 on faceoffs. Hmmm...
We spend so much time (rightly so) fretting about this insufficient blueline. And lord knows Jon Sim and company get their licks for being used above their talent level. (Sim got 9:28, zilch on the PP, by the way.) But we can't forget the search for who on this team can score besides John Tavares and Matt Moulson -- who have accounted for all of the Islanders goals in the last week since Nov. 28 in New Jersey, when Richard Park scored the lone goal in a 6-1 loss. It's worth noting that without the ample powerplay time that Tavares gets, he doesn't have four goals in the last two games, either.
There remain several movable parts who have either not performed (one view) or not gotten the consistent chance to perform (the other view). In that group you'd have to include Bailey, Frans Nielsen, Tambellini, Schremp, Blake Comeau and Sean Bergenheim. With Bergenheim out, it opens up one more slot in the opportunity department.
Safe to say two of those guys (Comeau and Bergenheim) are destined to be non-top-six, two-way wingers with a focus on the defensive side. Two of those guys can probably only stick around if they can score consistently (Tamby, Schremp). And the remaining two are centers, centers with #2 potential, but centers who will need to show more than they have on the offensive side.
I'm not pigeon-holing anyone yet, but it would be fun to get more time with these guys being mixed up and down depending on performance and chemistry. Depending on the length of Bergenheim and Jackman's injuries, maybe that happens -- and maybe the people pining for more Schremp are at least temporarily appeased.
Or maybe somebody gets healthy again and Schremp goes back to the press box.
Either way, this now three-game losing streak is distressing, but it has put me back into the evaluation mode that I fully expected to be in all season. Which is a little different than living and dying with each win and loss to see how long the Isles can stick out this quasi-.500, point-per-game pace.
* * *
Game Thread Thanks
If you saw the game thread, that, friends, is what a Pension Plan Puppets invasion looks like. (If you weren't in there live, the PPP participation was all contained to the 1st intermission/2nd period, except for some stragglers.) Thanks for playing along and being nice hosts; thanks for not shouting at them just because they speak a different form of English. And thanks to our PPP visitors for bringing their unique brand of Leafdom hallucinations; I swear, those Canadian pharmaceuticals are something else.
Since our in-game threads range from quiet to noisy depending on the day and the opponent, it's fun to do accept a visiting high-volume tribe every once in a while to see how these can go at max capacity. Some games you need to get more off your chest in-the-moment, so just know it's always there (and some days you wish your comments would go away ... which is why the threads are a little more disposable). We only had one flare-up -- not bad for a high-volume cross-team visit, so no worries. Generally, I just want people here to welcome visitors, ignore trolls (or in rare cases, stomp them with extreme prejudice before they are banned) and be cool with each other.
On that note, I know I read most sites a lot more than I comment. So if there are things you want or don't want here, just let me know via comment (or via email if you want privacy or insist on remaining a lurker). I can't promise I'll answer every request (That's a nice way of saying your comment goes directly to our Customer Service Department, where it will be considered very important and our people will respond within 6 to 8 weeks).
But if your request fits I'll try, and if I know what people generally prefer (time, type of post, topic, etc.), it will help me know how bad I'm ticking you off when I insist on doing whatever the hell I want anyway. But seriously, for a moment: I just run this place so Islanders fans and hockey fans have a welcoming place to chat hockey, and hopefully I have a good idea every once in a while. That's all.
Let's Go Islanders. Let's Go Second Line.
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
Schremp played well
I was very happy that Gordon finally gave robby a chance on the PP. He handled the puck great and made good decisions with it. He drew a penalty made a couple of great plays on the forecheck and I feel like he showed that he is a + skater.
I dont want to get to crazy excited about it because it was only 9 mins im glad to see he got some time and I feel he played well in that time. It was a tough draw for Josh Bailey though centering Sim and Comeau in what was easily the least skilled line. Blake did make a nice hit but that line has the difficult combo of lack of puckhandling ability and speed. Gordon kind of hung Bailey out to dry tonight. I would suggest swapping park up to line two with Frans and Tambi drop Hunts down to line three with Bailey to give him another puckhandler and drop either Comeau or Sim (prefferably Sim) to line 4 to grind it out defensively. Would hurt Schremps ability to create 5 on 5 but if he is getting consistant powerplay time like he did tonight im sure he wouldn’t mind.
Im rambling a little bit but mainly what im trying to say is Witt and Sim still stink and Bruno thank you for that horrible turnover to cost us the game…. Otherwise exciting game to watch and great comeback
I would suggest swapping park up to line two with Frans and Tambi drop Hunts down to line three with Bailey to give him another puckhandler and drop either Comeau or Sim (prefferably Sim) to line 4 to grind it out defensively.
Interesting combos.
Yeah, it was just one game, but Schremp played smart in those 4th-line minutes; they didn’t get hemmed in much. If he can do that and they can deploy him on the powerplay, I’d be interested to see how that plays out. But if you drop Sim down there instead of Park … well we keep going back to the problem of too many below-average forwards — at least one line will always be dragged down.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
Yea of course the 4th line will take a huge hit but if I have to suffer through watching Jon Sim play on my hockey team Id rather he be on the line that gets the least minutes. Pretty much all anyone mentions him bringing to the table is GRIT and HardWork which is what the fourth line is supposed to be. Theoretically I think it could work. Get Sim and Thompson to fore-check hard and maybe Schremp can catch a loose puck or a lucky bounce and get some open ice to showcase his hands, What im seeing in my head is kind of how Park tends to get good opportunities to dangle alot of the time but frequently loses the handle or doesnt finish on the shot. I think if we throw Blackhole Simma down there maybe we would have a chance for Robby to dangle and possibly finish those chances… Either way it is the 4th line so if your gonna play a stinker it should be the 4th line not the 3rd
Agreed, generally. I suspect the problem for Gordon is that he needs to at least try to roll four lines (particularly with the compressed Olympic year schedule), and it’s a question of trying to find balance or composing a 4th line that can really sink you. Because of Park’s speed and talent, Jackman-Thompson-Park is at least passable in theory. Move Sim down there and you really have a cluster.
Or so I suspect, anyway. ‘Cause I think you’re right — Park has that hands/talent level where he could create more opportunities, but he doesn’t have the help to convert them.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
last Islander goal scored by someone not named Moulson or Tavares?
November 28th by Richard Park against NJD
Way to spread it around guys!
In conclusion......
…..it’s a crisis of confidence more than anything else that’s caused the last 3 collapses, and I have to wonder if that extends to how much of the team feels about Biron; there has been little or no perceptible rhythm, rhyme or reason in any of them and that again speaks to communication/confidence issues.
When a team is playing with confidence, above all else, that means sufficient confidence in each other’s ability to finish plays, daring or routine, that they’re even attempted in the first place – faith in one’s coaching staff is a secondary concern for most players when they don’t have to worry about their teammates’ relative compentence…..which is why I’m very concerned: sooner or later the team begins to play much more conservatively due to such a lack of faith, leading to resentment and dissension for 2 reasons: one, players expected to produce will have been denied the resources to score (excepting JT-I and MM – whose penalties last night can be attributed to the shoddy officiating and hometown nerves; K-O is starting to appear quite frustrated and JT-II has been a complete non-factor throughout that span) and two, the lack of group philosophy that all teams must be able to fall back on will worsen as the crisis of confidence persists – can we trust Bruno to make this pass up-ice? Can we be sure that Frans will get to the net this time? Can we be sure that Marty clears that rebound if I attempt to let him back us up on that play? and so on…..
This way of thinking and second-guessing is at the root of what has been derisively referred to in too many seasons past as the Islanders ‘psychological problem’ but more than anything else, really is a damning testament to a consistent failure to create lasting cohesion and continuity as the team changed with each passing season. .
I have to believe that a lot of these players are quite cognizant of their skill levels and, more importantly, other’s limitations, which makes it IMPERATIVE that Snow do something sooner rather than later about bringing in fresh horses (especially on defense, where there’s only Streit and Sutton demonstrating leadership, the former clearly also demonstrating signs of stress – Hillen is still a bit too young in terms of NHL experience to be carrying the weight of such decisions and, as has been noted, Witt is a shadow of the on-ice blueline leader he once was…..while there were certain players in 2002-03 and 2008-09 that heavily influenced the disintegration of team morale, despite the more emotionally mature Bailey and Okposo, we – no, make that Gordon and Snow – need to be VERY concerned about it happening again with such a young group of players….. in short, all 3 games demonstrated that the Islanders need protection and reinforcements – FAST.
Confidence is going to be (is already?) an issue if they see an extended losing spell, which has the potential to become. But Bailey seems to go up and down at this point in his career, so I bet he’ll pot a few more before we have time to worry ourselves too much longer.
Bruno is … I don’t even know what to say. But that goal was a microcosm of our top pairing: Gervais overmatched, nearly loses it under pressure, sends it to Streit as a last-ditch outlet, but at that point they’re already pouncing and they strip it from Streit and bury it. So yeah, Streit is carrying too much, and Hillen is too young/small/not elite enough to be carrying a huge weight. Hopefully Sutton is back Saturday.
To the point of reinforcements, though: I’m not sure there’s anything out there to be done. That ship sailed over the summer when Snow didn’t add any blueliners. Now the only reinforcement available is probably either 1) guys who won’t help or 2) guys we don’t have the assets to trade for.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
yeah probably true
Garth, ya shoulda pulled the trigger on Babchuk. On the other hand, a better PP would probably not complete this team anyway and we’d get a worse draft pick. If we muddle along at about a point a game until the deadline and then have a wee slump, we should finish with about 75 points give or take. That may get us the #1 overall again and Taylor Hall. If we can somehow get a late first rounder again, we can use that and our #31 to get two quality defensive prospects. Then maybe Garth can work some magic and get Kirill over here, use cap leverage to get trades and FA signings of 2-3 quality defensemen and we should be ready to rock and roll next year. It was never really about this year anyway.
Crazy question, I admit.....
…..but is reacquiring MAB a possibility, at least for the short term? Do realize that he was viewed by many as a consistent defensive liability, but…..what if he served a purely transitional-game role when not taking up the point with Streit on the power play? I too recognized that his defensive game was, um, deficient, but Mark-Andre DID score a lot for us – well, 9 MORE goals than otherwise; had 15 for the Wild – as defensemen go and it might take some of the offensive weight off Streit. Not only that, it would free up K-O to be closer to the net as has been recommended by any number of us on this blog and Point Blank…..any thoughts on what Montreal might take for him, or is the Streit steal going to make it completely impossible?
Not at all
MAB is logging serious minutes and producing points on their powerplay. Maybe when Markov comes back MAB becomes expendable, but right now he’s one of their few bright spots.
I have to say, the powerplay looked different last night with Okposo diving down from the point more and Schremp drifting back up. That creates a different look that might ease the pressure on K.O. On the other hand, Toronto’s PK is awful, so they can make anyone look good.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
yeah don't want him anyway
now if we could get Edmonton to give up the other Denis, that I would go for!

by 


























