Cardiac Islanders blow 3-0 lead; flu-slapping Okposo wins it in OT
The fast, glorious pace with which the Islanders compiled an early 3-0 lead on the tail-spinning Hurricanes was matched by the glacial, agonizing squandering of that lead over the next two periods. Thankfully, on the 7th day god made Kyle Okposo, and it was good. Did I not tell you just Friday a.m. to just accept Okposo's übermensch abilities?
Game Sum. | Event Sum. | Recaps: nhl.com | Isles | Canes Country
Although it's maddening, I'm not going to panic too much about the blown lead. It's bad, but as fans with all our anxieties we tend to blow it up. Lots of teams go through this growing-pain phase. Given where the Islanders have come from -- arriving now, briefly, in 7th place -- blowing three-goal leads is a nice problem to have.
Meanwhile, lots of lineup implications for Saturday night in Florida. Josh Bailey and Jeff Tambellini got the scratch treatment for this one. But Rob Schremp, playing his "natural" role of center, did nothing to tell me he should dress for a third consecutive game. And Jon Sim, who was my preference for removal if everyone was healthy? My preference remains.
Video highlights and plenty more after the jump.
There Is Only One Okposo: After telling the swine flu who's boss, Okposo returned to the lineup to log the most minutes among Islanders forwards, playing key minutes on both the PP and the PK, netting the game winner and getting the assist on John Tavares's lacrosse hand-eye coordination goal. Just put a Standard Player Contract in front of him now, and let he and his parents fill in the figures and term.
There Are Many Sims: Not to harp on Sim or Schremp, but they were both out there for the tying goal, and they didn't look good. Two caveats, though: Martin Biron absolutely coughed a hairball on that shot. This tendency is beginning to make me worry about how badly other teams will want him. Second caveat is that absolutely every line had its moments of being hemmed in during the Canes' comeback. With Biron doing that, it could have happened to any of them.
Did I Mention There Is Only One Okposo? At the end of regulation, a Canes backchecker laid what my friend calls "the ax handle" on Okposo, leaning all his weight on Okposo's stick and body to keep him from getting the shot off. Okposo laughed it off, got a dangerous shot off anyway, which -- minus Joni Pitkanen mauling Matt Moulson in the crease -- would have led to a truly backbreaking game-winner right there. On the OT winner, Pitkanen couldn't stop his stick, and this came after Okposo brilliantly read the play to intercept a pass and win the game all by himself.
Whither Faceoffs? Nate Thompson (1-6) and Tavares (2-9) each had a rough night at the dot, for a team that won only 42%. Why do I feel like ever since I said "this faceoff trend is legit, not a fluke," they've been putting up nights like that?
Tavares's First Multi-Goal Game: It wasn't that Tavares's goal batting the puck in after it caromed off the grass was amazing -- I mean it was pretty good, for sure. But it was great that he seemed to be the only one on the ice who followed where it was going, just patiently followed it with his eyes, waited for it drop to a legal height, and calmly bunted it in.
Some Rather Critical Defensive Plays: While the walls were falling in, there were still some nice, heroic break-ups by the defense. Jack Hillen went knee-down to block (with his stick) a pass that would have set up Pitkanen all alone in the slot. Bruno Gervais spun to block another sure setup from the opposite side. And Mark Streit, in OT, prevented the winner at the top of the crease by doing what Biron might not have.
Mark Streit, Coming Around: After a slow start by last season's standards, Streit has started to heat up. Tonight, the sweetest sequence was Streit absolutely zinging a wrist shot from the point off the post, then minutes later, simply recalibrating with a slapshot that went in just inside said post. Even if I'd stumbled into the talent to be an NHL player, no way would I have the necessary courage to step in front of that thing.
Special Teams: The powerplay looked outstanding in the first -- they converted twice and had the Canes running around aimlessly. The PK was solid, leaving only stoppable shots for Biron as they killed 3 of 4 chances.
Timing, Timing: The Canes' equalizer finally came with just 2:31 left in the game. Okposo's winner came just a faceoff after Streit's game-saving block, and with just 0:15 left in the OT period, sparing us another godforsaken shootout.
Dirty Night Avoided: The Canes came out hitting with determination (if not direction), and after the Islanders built the 3-0 lead, I was worried about a spiral that would lead to injuries. Sure enough, someone tried to take off Frans Nielsen's head, and immediately afterward Sean Bergenheim threw a dangerous hit from behind on Joe Corvo. Thankfully, the silliness ended there.
* * *
Not Only, But Also: Not only did the Islanders win in OT, the Sound Tigers did too, breaking their Hurricanes-like slump. Mike Fornabaio tweets: Bentivoglio scores his second of the night from the right side 1:32 into OT, and the Sound Tigers win for the first time since Halloween.
Up Next: The daunting Tomas Vokoun and his Florida Panthers, who shut the Bruins out 1-0 Thursday and whose 2009 draft prize, Dimitry Kulikov, has 1 goal and 6 assists.
Thoughts on any of those topics, or others I missed? With time to digest, how disturbed are you by the blown 3-0 lead?
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Schremp played well
You always seem well informed and to make knowledgable decisions but your jumping on the Schremp hating band wagon kills me man. It seems like unless he scores he must not be playing well. As I have said from the begining he remains one of the better face-off men on a team that you highlighted struggled mightly on the draws tonight. Unless I’m seeing a different game then everyone else he continues to show me that he plays hard , gets in the right spots and makes good decisions. His problems defensively are so overhyped it makes me steam. You had Schremp paired with Sim and Hunts who are in my mind the two slowest skaters on the team its not exactly the dream situation for an offensive playmaker.
That brings me to Tambi and Bailey. I have no clue why they where scratched I missed the pregame because of work and haven’t been able to find out why anywhere. I’m hoping Gordon just wanted to get a little rotation with the back to back games and look to utilize fresh legs and more physical players with bigger bodies (Hunter , Comeau) and save Tambi and Bailey for what maybe he sees as more of speed game tonight against the Panthers. Or perhaps he planned on only using KO and Comeau for one of the games because of their battle with sickness and saw Carolina as a better match-up for them. Either way both Tambi and Bailey have been playing better and better so this benching has can’t be anything extended unless for health reasons. The way I’d like to see them get back into the line-up is first and foremost BENCH SIM!!!!! He has played every game and has 2 points , he isnt better than anyone on the team in the defensive zone and we aren’t going to be able to trade him so please…BENCH SIM!!!! Once the obvious move is done I would give Comeau tommorow night off and drop Hunts down to the 4th line. With Nate and Tim I think Hunts would do some damage. That leaves us with a 3rd line of Tambellini – Bailey – Schremp . Gordon says Schremp needs to play his natural C position but I’d bet if you ask a 23 year old kid if he’d rather play RW or be benched 9 straight in favor of Sim im sure he will learn to be an effective RW. The real problem I feel is we haven’t given Schremp an opportunity with two gifted offensive players. While I still feel he would be the perfect compliment to Tavares and Moulson I know thats blasphemy and I wont hold my breath. So I’d settle for Schremp to roll with two guys that can skate , have great shots , and are tenacious on the fore-check. Untill we give him a legitimate chance we can’t keep dumping on him. He is 23 and his potential is through the roof…. sounds like the foundation of a Rebuild process to me
With that, I think we have officially taken the Eternal Schremp Debate mantle over from Oilers fans.
I agree Schremp hasn’t had ideal linemates, but I haven’t seen enough from him even on the powerplay or even strength to make me think he warrants it. Positioning, defensive diligence, even offensive imagination … it could be there, and it’s tough for a 23-year-old, but he’s got to force them to give it to them, too. As far as time on the wing, he sounded uncomfortable with it himself early on; maybe his stance changes in the face of so many scratches, but I definitely haven’t seen strength along the boards or speed from him to tell me his future is as a winger.
On Hunter: I think moving him to the 4th line just makes that a slow line rather than creates an opportunity for him.
With the Tamby/Bailey scratch, I didn’t see anything on it either, but I assume it’s not long-term. I’m not against scratching them to give them a jolt or new perspective though.
Interesting issues, for sure. If and when the roster decision comes, I’d happily see a little more of Schremp rather than have them protect Sim.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
I think since Schremp was brought in, Bailey, Tambellini especially, and the entire 4th line have stepped up their games noticeably. Think the pressure of a scratch has made them better. Guessing, but wonder if Gordon thinks random scratches will keep this bring your A game every night mentality for this group. If so I am for that for the time being.
If so, I’m a big fan of that tact. A healthy scratch doesn’t have to be humiliating; it can just be a wake-up call, a way of reminding everyone that no one has an entitled spot, and keeps any of your teammates from being the constant, awkward, “he only plays if someone gets sick” guy.
Also, for Bailey it’s been a wild ride being pushed to the NHL so early. He’s got the kind of head where it shouldn’t shatter his confidence.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
Blown leads
I’ve said it before on this blog, it is way too early to in the story of this core to worry about blown leads. Streit is the only piece over 25 that will be here in 3 years when the Isles will be expected to be good (maybe Hunter). Everyone else that will be here in 3 years is, like, 21. True enough that youth can’t always be an excuse but, for now it totally is. I’ve also pointed out that they seem to play better in the third when Weight is in the line-up. So, I did some research. He has played 11 games this season, 5 wins, 5 L, 1 OTL. He has only been present for one of these blown leads, the first game against Carolina, which they also subsequently won. We just lack quality veterans. Look at good young teams, most have a few (2 or 3) quality veteren winners. Aside from Weight we don’t. Our vets are filler during a re-building stage. No one is going to confuse Jon Sim, Brendan Witt, Andy Sutton, Richard Park, etc as star vets who have a winning past (no offense to Park, who I actually really like) None of those people have ever had success at the NHL level. Weight was at one time a superstar in this league, he brings a winning pedigree. The Isles are different in the 3rd with him there. That will just be the case until they get older and more experienced. Another reason not to move Weight at the deadline.
I buy into this idea, actually. I think Weight has a calming influence, and I remember his first game back after the flu looked different for everyone in the third.
Early three-goal leads, particularly in the post-lockout NHL, are a tricky bird. It’s so psychological: Looks like a big lead, but then the team gets the first one back and they’re “still in this.” You play 50/50 hockey after that but they still get the second one back and suddenly they’re “only one goal away” and you’re “oh no, don’t blow this” — you’re at your least confident while the other team suddenly thinks destiny is in their hands.
On NHL on the Fly last night, when referring to this game, they talking heads said, “Here we go again, we’ve been seeing big lead changes like this all season long” (referring to teams throughout the NHL).
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
Biron Flubbed It
Another nice post, Dom. I think the most concerning issue you raised was the 3 goal lead blown by the Isles. Biron’s third goal was pretty bad.. and I also seem to be noticing a trend here. Not only am I worried about (possible) trade value, I am concerned about our young team’s pysche. Like you said, given where we’ve come from, this is a “good” problem to be having.. but also, given where we’ve come from don’t you think its uber-demoralizing to the young’ns to be blowing leads with 200 seconds remaining? I’m sorry.. but that rests on the veteran goaltending we signed this summer. Rolly and Biron were brought in to close the gates in the final minutes… am I wrong? Granted, a few last minute goals that hurt us this year would be tough to blame the goalies for, but last night’s flub really irked me…
I have been hearing rumors that Sim’s play (outside of offensive stats) has been quite solid. I am not proclaiming to be a hockey expert by any stretch of the imagination, but I don’t see that being the case. The way I see it is Jon Sim tore it up in the AHL last year and now (once again) can’t produce a lick at the NHL level. What does this mean to Islander fans? Sim is an AHL player now, never should have been signed to that ridiculous 3-year deal in the first place, and needs to be put on waivers before we play Florida tonight. Jeez. Do you agree that Sim has had enough chances, or are you still hopeful Sim can be a force in front of the net?
Isn’t KO so much fun to watch? (btw- thank you for posting the game highlights. over the last couple months this has quickly become one of my go-to places for Isles info and analysis)
Thank you for the kind words, and for logging in. This goes for any readers: Don’t know if you like to read comments, but if you do, creating an account makes them much easier to navigate (you can jump to new ones by hitting ‘z’, you can check your profile to see if someone’s replied directly to your comment, etc.). Even if you don’t comment, it might be worth creating the userid just for that. (I say that from experience, realizing what I was missing the first time I actually created an SBN account after lurking for many months).
(On that note, if anyone has specific site feedback and requests, just let me know. If you don’t want to leave them publicly, you can always email me through the link at the bottom of each page.) End of spiel.
On Sim: I hope he can be a force in front of the net … for another team. I beat up on him a bit, but I don’t think he’s awful — I just think he doesn’t have more than a 4th-line role on this team, so I’d want him to be the odd man out when everyone’s healthy. It’s a shame about the contract; that preseason, everyone raved about him, then he blew out his knee in Game 2 and he’s spent the past 2 years trying to get back to that point, without getting any younger, while the team style has completely changed.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
Biron’s third goal was pretty bad.. and I also seem to be noticing a trend here. Not only am I worried about (possible) trade value, I am concerned about our young team’s pysche
That kind of thing will not affect his trade value one bit. That goal is forgotten, the Isles got the win. When it comes right down to it, he and Rolosons stats are essentailly comparable. They are back to back in pretty much everything. Yeah Roloson has more wins, but he has gotten more goal support too. The Hockey Rodent does great stats on goaltenders and if you look through em all, the two of them are very comparable. They are both doing fine.
Lets go Islanders...
I agree one goal here and there shouldn’t matter much, but Biron has a reputation for that — at least among fans who watched him in Philly.
Impossible to know his rep among GMs (though the fact no one stepped up to sign him might be a hint, or it might just be a sign of everyone’s cap crunch), but I don’t want trade suitors to think of him as “veteran backup if we need it” — I want them to think of him as someone who can carry them and is worth a hefty futures price.
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
Biron has a reputation for that — at least among fans who watched him in Philly. Impossible to know his rep among GMs
I think thats a good point, I guess what Im saying is that letting up a goal here on LI (that was arguably something he might have stopped- at worst) in a game for which he gets the win anyway isnt really going to affect a reputation that a guy has already established. Biron is already Biron… as long as he plays respectably and has good stats (which he does) he is going to get as much attention as he ever would.
the fact no one stepped up to sign him might be a hint
If he did not sign with the Islanders I am 100% certain he would have signed with another team by now- thats how it looks to me.
Lets go Islanders...
by TheMetalChick on Nov 14, 2009 2:08 PM EST up reply actions
You may be right on both points. (I hope so!) And one thing majorly in our favor is he should be the best goalie on the market this winter, including free agents.
Now I’m already laughing at myself for citing Philly fans as evidence of anything reasonable. :P
Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.
Gervais looked lost out there
I ‘m looking for Gervais to step it up and prove that he belongs but I’m just not seeing it.

by 










































