Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: New York Giants Win Super Bowl XLVI, 21-17

NHL Shootout Myth #47: Look! People are standing!

"You think the shootout is a bad way to end regular-season games? What if I told you the Olympic gold medal game could be decided that way? Because that's the truth. What an ugly thought that is. But as for NHL regular-season games, I don't mind it, my friend. Walk into an NHL rink during a shootout and tell me how many people are actually sitting down."

>>Pierre LeBrun, espn.com

The most tired, circular and evasive justification for the shootout there is.

Star-divide

 

You like the shootout? Fine. We can agree to disagree on taste. If you think a breakaway drill -- that takes place at half of game speed, mind you, without even the threat of a backchecker to make the shooter think twice -- is a great way to award half a win's worth of points after 65 minutes of hockey, fine. If you're just tickled pink by some dangler spinning in circles, crashing into the goalie, and then fist-pumping as if he just accomplished something, then we just like hockey for different reasons. If your tie-allergic self needs a "winner" (falsely) declared so bad that you must "settle" games this way, great. I lose the vote. I concede.

But stop using the "no one is sitting down!" argument as justification. Because people aren't sitting down during OT scoring chances either. You know why? The game is on the damned line.

You could have a bow-and-arrow accuracy contest at center ice, with the players in their skivvies. You could have a stuff-the-clown-in-the-VW contest at center ice. You could make the players shoot for the empty-net wrong-handed and blind-folded. For all of these, if the outcome determined which team just earned another point in the standings, people would not be sitting down.

So stop the fallacy. Stop pretending that the artificial value ascribed to the shootout justifies its existence. If the two points in the standings were determined by who won the 2nd period, guess what? Few people would show up for the 1st for the overpriced pizza and beer, and not a sober soul would still be around for the exhibition 3rd.

I get that some people like it (and flippancy aside, I don't mind that you do). I get that it's exciting. Hell, I'm standing during shootouts, too. But that doesn't mean I like it. And it doesn't mean I feel good about things afterward, win or loss.

So please: If it must stay (and surely it will), at least stop letting teams who resolve their games via shootout earn the same reward as teams who take care of business in 60 minutes of actual teamwork.

Retort, refute or hallelujah in comments.

Comment 21 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The 1994 Olympics Gold Medal game was decided by a shootout. Sweden defeated Canada and it left a bad taste in everybody’s mouth.

by john tandlich on Nov 10, 2009 9:13 PM EST reply actions  

But the postage stamp! Who can forget the postage stamp?!

It’s often overlooked, but the ‘94 World Cup was decided by soccer’s equivalent for the shootout, and Italy lost because one of its stars (Roberto Baggio) sent his penalty kick — after 120 minutes of play — over the crossbar.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Nov 11, 2009 12:56 AM EST up reply actions  

BTW, several soccer or football stories making the rounds...

a German netminder committed suicide by speeding train

and

a US woman playing for New Mexico has been featured in some You Tube videos brutalizing opponents in a game against BYU.

by BCISLEMAN on Nov 11, 2009 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

unless presumably you are Swedish, a fan of Forsberg, or kind of tired of canadian “hockey is our game” crap

by sctlaw on Nov 11, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed.

The shootout is fun to watch but it’s a gimmick that shouldn’t be deciding crucial points for the regular season (and definitely not deciding something like a Gold Medal at the Olympics). I’m all for dropping the loser point while we’re at it.

I thought you knew that algebra was all razzamatazz. A Globetrotter always saves the good algebra for the final minutes.

by A.J. Haefele on Nov 10, 2009 11:26 PM EST reply actions  

The loser point

The stomach-kicking thing is, I don’t think they’re ever dropping the loser point, nor changing what a regulation win is worth, because this system artificially feeds parity.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Nov 11, 2009 12:56 AM EST up reply actions  

i was never a fan of the 3 point game, in a perfect world, points would be like this for me

Reg. and OT Win = 2
Reg. and OT Loss=0
SO win = 1.5
SO loss = .5

this would likely eliminate most of the awful tie-breaking scenarios that runs 15 deep

it would bring a lot more drama to OT and the SO as well

and yes i know it will NEVER happen

why isn't #16 hanging in the rafters?

by bob l on Nov 11, 2009 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd be a fan of that

Half points would be great, and I don’t like the cumbersome idea of wins suddenly being worth three. (But like you say: alas … will never happen. :sigh:)

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Nov 11, 2009 11:10 AM EST up reply actions  

The shootout is really a stupid way of deciding a game

I propose that they settle these games gladiator style. Give the two best goons on the team a trident and a net and let em have a go.

Kate Murray can reside over the whole affair with Colin Campbell her assistant. Certainly the benefit of instant replay in Toronto can be relied on to determine who fought valiantly. This way Kate can’t possibly fuck up deciding who lives or dies.

She certainly can’t be accused of bias toward the hometown team.

by Chickendirt on Nov 10, 2009 11:43 PM EST reply actions  

This, absolutely, will leave no one sitting down.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Nov 11, 2009 12:54 AM EST up reply actions  

is the reason they stand for excitement, or is there ALSO the fact that they know they’re leaving in 2 minutes? if the game was 5-0 and i stayed til the end, i would be standing up, maybe at the top of the stairs (or bottom if i was upper tier) waiting for the buzzer to walk out

why isn't #16 hanging in the rafters?

by bob l on Nov 11, 2009 9:47 AM EST reply actions  

Shootout

No Shootout, no Ties. Play until there is a winner and if it goes 5 overtimes and you feel it is becoming a detriment to your team and you dont need the two points, then let a goal in. But am not a fan of the SO and hate ties.

by ATL Jim on Nov 11, 2009 9:58 AM EST reply actions  

Alternative to shoot-out

How about after the 5 min 4 on 4 overtime, they play another 5 min at 4 on 3 alternating pp opportunities at the halfway mark (2 min 30 sec). The team that gets first crack at the pp could be the team with the least amount of penalties that game or had the most shots or least takeaways (name your most random stat)….whatever at least its still hockey.

I find myself turning to other regulation games on tv when the game I’m watching goes to shootout (with the exception of Isles games of course)…shootouts are more often than not the most boring part of a hockey game for me.

by mdelbags on Nov 11, 2009 6:15 PM EST reply actions  

I remember talk that doubling the length of OT would significantly increase the number of winners. I’d do that and accept ties (but ties didn’t bug me so much to begin with).

I agree with the boring part, obviously. They’re just anti-climactic, and the most revered moves generally leave a bad taste in my mouth.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Nov 11, 2009 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Shootout

When the shootout first started I thought it was a cool idea and would add excitement to the end of the game. Now though I am not sure how I feel about it. But like you said if they do keep the shootout around I totally agree that it should not equal the same amount of points you get for a regulation win. They should tier the points system where for example: win=3 points, shootout or OT win=2 points, and a shootout or OT loss= 1 point. That is just one possible solution so shootout wins do not equal the same amount of points as a regulation win.

by tmook on Nov 12, 2009 9:48 AM EST reply actions  

Of course I agree :)

Are you an Isles fan? I suspect last night’s 11-rounder was a dream for shootout fans. It was a novelty to me … but it looks like even the players on the bench have this vibe about them that they’re watching a coin toss. Just weird to see them bust their tail and then see another point awarded that way.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Nov 12, 2009 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

one thing about the SO...

it is a real benefit to the team that is being outplayed in OT…which was the Isles last night.

by BCISLEMAN on Nov 12, 2009 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

if the other leagues followed the nhl...

MLB to change rules, will have a maximum of 1 extra inning and then determine a winner via Home Run Derby where batters hit off of a tee

NBA follows suit and now will have ties broken with a game of HORSE

PGA is debating installing a mini-golf style “19th” hole at every course instead of going through hole after hole of playoff rounds…

NFL changes nothing- says, if you tie, so be it

why isn't #16 hanging in the rafters?

by bob l on Nov 12, 2009 1:36 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip and shoulder surgery not required.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jt_small
Looking Ahead: Free Agent Defensemen
5790919740_006af70e93_t_small
John Tavares – The Anti-Islander
Kevinwriterpic_small
Anders Lee: Worth the Wait

Recent FanPosts

Kevinwriterpic_small
2012 NHL Draft Prospect Profile: Nail Yakupov
Capt
10 Game Chunk #5: Playing Like a Playoff-Bound Team Would
Icon3_small
January 2012 Power Rankings: A Playoff-Level Month?
Small
WHY IS EATON PLAYING WHILE REESE SITS?
Gigantor15_small
JP's January Plus/Minus Poll
Kevinwriterpic_small
The One-Two Punch
20091221_pauly_190x190_small
Time for MSG and Time Warner to pay!!!! My new campaign!
Small
Dad, What Should Jan Do With All These Centers?
5790919740_006af70e93_t_small
Milbury Islanders vs. Current Oilers
Capt
Lighthouse Fantasy Dream Season, wrapup

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Rhett Rakhshani:

  240 votes | Results

Isles Reading

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New York Rangers 50 33 12 5 71
Philadelphia 52 30 16 6 66
Pittsburgh 53 30 19 4 64
New Jersey 52 30 19 3 63
New York Islanders 51 21 22 8 50

(updated 2.5.2012 at 4:42 PM EST)

New York Islanders Roster

# Pos. DOB W H
Josh Bailey 12 LW 10/2/1989 190 6-1
Rick DiPietro 39 G 9/19/1981 190 6-1
Mark Eaton 4 D 5/6/1977 215 6-1
Michael Grabner 40 RW 10/5/1987 185 6-0
Travis Hamonic 3 D 8/16/1990 203 6-2
Milan Jurcina 27 D 6/7/1983 253 6-4
Andrew MacDonald 47 D 9/7/1986 196 6-1
Matt Martin 17 LW 3/8/1989 210 6-3
Al Montoya 35 G 2/13/1985 203 6-2
Mike Mottau 10 D 3/19/1978 190 6-0
Matt Moulson 26 LW 11/1/1983 205 6-1
Evgeni Nabokov 20 G 7/25/1975 200 6-0
Nino Niederreiter 25 RW 9/8/1992 205 6-2
Frans Nielsen 51 C 4/24/1984 184 6-0
Kyle Okposo 21 RW 4/16/1988 205 6-0
Jay Pandolfo 29 LW 12/27/1974 190 6-1
P.A. Parenteau 15 LW 3/24/1983 193 6-0
Rhett Rakhshani 49 RW 3/6/1988 190 5-10
Marty Reasoner 16 C 2/26/1977 205 6-1
Dylan Reese 42 D 8/29/1984 201 6-1
Brian Rolston 11 LW 2/21/1973 215 6-2
Steve Staios 24 D 7/28/1973 200 6-1
Mark Streit 2 D 12/11/1977 197 6-0
John Tavares 91 C 9/20/1990 202 6-0
Tim Wallace 36 RW 8/6/1984 207 6-1
Calvin de Haan 44 D 5/9/1991 187 6-1

Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Warlord2_small Mark D

Lighthouse_hockey_logo_2_medium_small Keith Quinn

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Hg_small Chris McNally

Master of FIGs and Power Tablature

Icon3_small ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein

71096_479208120482_1257968_n_small David Hanssen