Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Ten Worst Swings Of The 2011 Season

Islanders Links: 1st win celebration edition

The first win brings out the happy. Lots of love, hugs and kisses around the Islanders nation as third-period fear turns to relief, to jubilation, and to greed -- we want more, and we want it tonight in Montreal.

More links and post-game videos after the jump...

Star-divide

  • Isleblogger's live blog of the game: "While we wait, Sutton tipped a Jack Hillen shot from the point. They are checking to see if it was too high, being he is eight feet tall."
  • Okposo Net: Relief. "Roloson even went as far as to compare his first Islanders win to a kid attending his first pro sporting event."
  • Islanders 360: "The Isles are on pace to match their point total from last season, averaging 0.7 points per game."
  • 7th Woman: The ups and downs, from Tavares going down (briefly) to him going up, high, on Cam Ward.
  • View from Section 317: Just a happy day in Islanders Country.
  • Islanders Hockey Blog called it a "Miracle on Hempstead Turnpike." Sometimes it feels that way.
  • 7th Woman: Airs worries and grievances about the Lighthouse Project.
John Tavares on the collapse and on being the hero:


Andy Sutton sounds relieved, feels good and believes in the power of positive energy:


Scott Gordon, in his usual riveting post-game demeanor:


Elsewhere:

Florida-Buffalo: After two goals, Scott Clemmensen was pulled before two minutes had elapsed. Donnie at Litter Box Cats calls the Panthers' situation "disgusting. Embarrassing." And some other pleasantries.

In Chicago, Willie Mitchell came out of the penalty box to level Toews. Video and discussion here. Everyone will say Toews "should have had his head up," but what he really needed was awareness that the penalty was over, and therefore suddenly a third defenseman was lurking to take him out. (Note the other two d-men -- who Toews was no doubt aware of when he turned up ice -- were playing their expected position. It was the third guy, Mitchell, who only gets that opportunity if he's coming out of the box against the run of play.)

*  *  *

That's not all, but that's a healthy fly-by. If you found something interesting (you can also post a FanShot) or if you wrote something Islander-ific I missed, don't hesitate to drop a note in comments. These posts are intended to record game reactions, see what people are saying, stir a little conversation on any random topic, and spread a little linky love.

Time to take down Montreal -- we are winners, baby!

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

On the Toews hit...

TSN announcers pronounced it clean and someone heard Toews admit when he got to the bench (after half crawling off the ice—he did not play again and has an upper body injury) that he should have had his head up. He had been looking cross-ice for a pass.

Quenneville conceded the hit was clean. Little Kris Versteeg went right after Mitchell and Cam Barker laconically noted: “We play them again.”

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/hockey/blackhawks/chi-22-blackhawks-canucks-oct22,0,6442347.story

And, as the article notes, Niemi was once again solid in net, but Cristobal convinces himself that he is still Number One:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/hockey/blackhawks/chi-21-blackhawks-chicago-oct21,0,5665089.story

by BCISLEMAN on Oct 22, 2009 12:23 PM EDT reply actions  

As to Matt Moulson...

he would be tied for second on the Kings in goals scored if he was still there…giving further ammunition to those Kings posters who already think Lombardi is an “idiot”.

by BCISLEMAN on Oct 22, 2009 12:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Weight

is out of the lineup tonight…

by Cal_IslandersFan on Oct 22, 2009 12:28 PM EDT reply actions  

I do hope Gordon goes with Schremp instead of Sim, but Strang sounds doubtful. Maybe he wants a “natural” winger though.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Oct 22, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I agree Dom.

I know that Schremp hasn’t had too much success at the NHL level, but I’d really like to see him get plenty of playing time. He’s had a ton of AHL and OHL success, I’m hoping that he can turn into a real steal.

by Cal_IslandersFan on Oct 22, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wonder how much “keeping the room” is a factor for Gordon in handling Sim. Not that he’ll lose the team, etc., but I do wonder if it enters the equation and he decides to play the veteran over playing Schremp out of position. Sim’s not long for this place no matter what, but they certainly don’t want a repeat of last year with him.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Oct 22, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

He’s had a ton of AHL and OHL success, I’m hoping that he can turn into a real steal.

I hate to keep being that guy regarding Schremp, but 0.79 points per game in the A isn’t really blowing the doors off in Springfield. Of course a lot of that has to do with stepping into the elevator shaft last season (as Lowetide terms it) on a dismal Falcons team. I remain skeptical about his ability to convert in the NHL. Rob Schremp, please rebrand your hockey and prove me wrong.

by zytsef on Oct 22, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hear ya. However, he didn’t have a ton of talent around him on those Springfield teams. Last year the team was horrible, and the year before he was the only good player on the team. His stats could have been padded a lot more, had Springfield had a topnotch veteran or two to play with him…

I’m not saying that Robbie Schremp will be the saving grace for the franchise, I just think that five years from now we could possibly be looking at this waiver-claim and shaking our heads at why Edmonton tried to send him down…

by Cal_IslandersFan on Oct 22, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

As an Oiler fan I hope you’re wrong. Oilers invested a pretty significant amount of development time to this guy and got nothing for it. If the light turns on (finally) I’ll be a little sad. On the other hand, as someone who tends to root for underdogs (see: Oilers fan, see: becoming an Islanders fan) it would also be a joyous occasion if Robby finally found some success.

The fact that I decided to become an Islanders fan immediately before they acquired Schremp is an odd coincidence. I was kind of looking forward to not talking about him for a while.

by zytsef on Oct 22, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am guessing that Sim has the speed to get the puck up ice that Tavares and Moulson will need to to work their magic. I’m guessing that Gordon is choosing to trade his net blindness for the speed he will generate.

I agree with you and Cal in that I think Shremp should get a shot as well. That could prove to be interesting. I am curious to see how he plays with Tavares and Moulson.

by metalcoconut on Oct 22, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

For the love of god, why do we have to be cursed with Jon Sim?

He’s terrible. Please play Schremp. kthnx.

by AP77 on Oct 22, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Alright that was hard to watch but it is good they figured out how to get the 2 rather than the 1. Let’s hope they can ride the wave of success into Montreal. It would be nice to see the youngsters take out the mostly new Canadians on a back to back but then again this is a travel game a day after a home game.

I guess that is part of the fun, not being able to guess what team shows up tonight because they are so young and unpredicable. Regardless of their final score I hope they put in a full 3 periods. I know that they will be tired but it will hurt to watch them have a let down the day after a win.

by metalcoconut on Oct 22, 2009 12:52 PM EDT reply actions  

I guess that is part of the fun, not being able to guess what team shows up tonight because they are so young and unpredictable.

Haha, no doubt. Honestly, I want a dominant team, but the fun part of the rebuild is watching these little spurts and glimpses of what might come, while the losses are a bummer but not make-or-break. (Or in other words, I can enjoy some other sides of the game when I’m not worried a blown lead just cost us a playoff spot.)

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Oct 22, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

metalcoconut,

You hit the nail on the head here; the Islanders need to play a full three periods of hockey. Last night could have easily turned out like the Bruins game a few weeks ago.

I hope they come out strong again tonight and quiet the crowd quickly. Two wins in a row could be a huge momentum swing for a young club like this.

by Cal_IslandersFan on Oct 22, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Last night could have easily turned out like the Bruins game a few weeks ago.

Man, it practically did. Same scenario, only difference being Samsanov’s move didn’t work and all three Isles shooters nailed their moves to perfection. That’s why I felt so relieved yet dirty about the “win.” I swear I need to stop railing on the shootout, but it bugs me that games like this are worth the same as a 60-minute win.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Oct 22, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Andy Sutton deserves a little more respect from Isles nation

Guy is far from perfect but he cares and the effort is really there. He’s been one of our better D to start this season.

Martinek has probably been the worst player on the ice. Never thought I would say that about him to start this season.

by Chickendirt on Oct 22, 2009 2:08 PM EDT reply actions  

This is nonsense, I’m sorry to say. Sutton happened to play the game of his life last night. He should probably retire on top.

But make no mistake: he is a butcher both on and away from the puck. He’s one of, if not the, worst in the NHL.

by AP77 on Oct 22, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

How is it nonsense?

Thus far this season, Sutton has filled the role we brought him in here to fill. Nobody claimed he was the next coming of Potvin, Bourque or Pronger.

He is what he is, a fourth D man who can through some jarring hits and contribute offensivly. When he plays his role he’s one of the best players on the team cause he’s so effective at it.

He has been really good in just about every game this year. I thought he was playing well last year before going down.

One of the worst in the NHL? Not even close. Martinek lately has filled that role.

by Chickendirt on Oct 22, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

and he has offensive upside

is martinek really worse than witter? his plus / minus is pretty decent.

by BCISLEMAN on Oct 22, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Defense

Just out of curiosity, how do you guys rank the d-men, behind the obvious #1 Streit?

by Cal_IslandersFan on Oct 22, 2009 3:29 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't at this point because...

all of them except Streit, Gervais, and Hillen are sure to be gone if not this year then next. We have promising defenders in our system: De Haan, Ness, Hamonic, Niemi, and possibly a few others. We still need a real megastar on defense like Fowler…but we also need another star quality forward like Hall. If we get the #1 overall, we will have to pick Hall and then hopefully we can get a quality physical top four defender by trade or FA over the summer.

by BCISLEMAN on Oct 22, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great Question

I’ll bite:
1. Streit (a true #1)
2. Martinek (a potential #3)
3. Gervais (based on last year’s work, which was heavily influenced by pairing with Streit)
4. Hillen (based on potential alone; still hard to get a read on his defensive side)
5a/5b. Sutton/Witt
6. Meyer

It’s hard to pin down, because you can’t have a blueline without some physicality, so I wouldn’t just say “get rid of Sutton/Witt/Meyer.” At the same time, the physical guys either bring deficiencies or an inability to deploy Gordon’s system (or both). I want Witt to work out. I’d love for Sutton to be consistent. But inconsistency plagues the whole group outside of Streit — I don’t know if that’s pure deficiency, an inability to find pairs that work, or the fact that some nights they can show flashes while other nights the opposition exploits them.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Oct 22, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hillen seems to make a mistake every game, but usually makes up for it with 1 or 2 great offensive plays.

But behind Streit, the rest of our D scares the hell out of me. I mean last night one of the Dmen threw a cross ice pass in the defensive zone that naturally got intercepted and almost scored for the Canes. I know he was aiming for another player that was in the middle of the ice, but you never throw a pass sideways in the defensive zone.

by Mark D on Oct 22, 2009 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gervais and Hillen are OK. The others are OK too, but nobody is by any stretch a special player—Witt was earlier in his career—they are older, slower, take too many penalties and get injured too often and—while they may have value on a veteran team that is trying to contend—are not the kind of defenders you want on a growing young developing team.

by BCISLEMAN on Oct 22, 2009 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

The problem isn’t consistency, it’s talent. As in the total lack thereof outside of Streit.

I am fine with this. You don’t need a great defense anymore if you can score a lot of goals. See, e.g., 2008 Penguins.

by AP77 on Oct 22, 2009 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Those guys had some consistent, unremarkable defensemen, though. Maybe that’s the thing: If you can put up goals, the pressure eases off your pedestrian defense. ‘Cause we’re not scaring anybody, and the burden on the defense just gets more challenging.

Lighthouse Hockey: Side effects may include Weight gain and frequent game loss.

by Dominik on Oct 22, 2009 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think with one more elite forward, our offense begins to kick butt. With one more elite defender added to DeHaan, Ness, Hamonic (along with Streit, Gervais, and Hillen), we will have the makings of a great defense. If there were a way to get Boston’s Toronto pick and grab Hall AND Fowler, we would be set!

by BCISLEMAN on Oct 23, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A New York Islanders blog for fans near and far. Hip and shoulder surgery not required.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

890_1__small
The defenseman that could be... +POLL

Recent FanPosts

Small
Isles Missing Grit, Not Toughness
X-wing_small
Time to Sell on Evgeni Nabokov
Small
No toughness
Kevinwriterpic_small
2012 NHL Draft Prospect Profile: Matt Dumba
Small
Reeser Out 2-3 Weeks, Who's next?
One_smith03_small
Nielsen and Tavares Happily Drink the Kool-Aid! So What's Our Problem with UFA's?
Small
Would Milbury have drafted Tavares?
Kevinwriterpic_small
2012 NHL Draft Prospect Profile: Nail Yakupov
Capt
10 Game Chunk #5: Playing Like a Playoff-Bound Team Would

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Garth Snow screwed this one up because he should have:

  296 votes | Results

Isles Reading

Atlantic Standings

GP W L OTL PT
New York Rangers 55 37 13 5 79
Philadelphia 56 31 18 7 69
Pittsburgh 56 32 19 5 69
New Jersey 56 32 20 4 68
New York Islanders 56 24 24 8 56

(updated 2.15.2012 at 3:50 AM EST)

New York Islanders Roster

# Pos. DOB W H
Josh Bailey 12 LW 10/2/1989 190 6-1
Rick DiPietro 39 G 9/19/1981 190 6-1
Mark Eaton 4 D 5/6/1977 215 6-1
Michael Grabner 40 RW 10/5/1987 185 6-0
Travis Hamonic 3 D 8/16/1990 203 6-2
Milan Jurcina 27 D 6/7/1983 253 6-4
Andrew MacDonald 47 D 9/7/1986 196 6-1
Matt Martin 17 LW 3/8/1989 210 6-3
Al Montoya 35 G 2/13/1985 203 6-2
Mike Mottau 10 D 3/19/1978 190 6-0
Matt Moulson 26 LW 11/1/1983 205 6-1
Evgeni Nabokov 20 G 7/25/1975 200 6-0
Aaron Ness 55 D 5/18/1990 170 5-10
Nino Niederreiter 25 RW 9/8/1992 205 6-2
Frans Nielsen 51 C 4/24/1984 184 6-0
Kyle Okposo 21 RW 4/16/1988 205 6-0
Jay Pandolfo 29 LW 12/27/1974 190 6-1
P.A. Parenteau 15 LW 3/24/1983 193 6-0
Marty Reasoner 16 C 2/26/1977 205 6-1
Dylan Reese 42 D 8/29/1984 201 6-1
Brian Rolston 11 LW 2/21/1973 215 6-2
Steve Staios 24 D 7/28/1973 200 6-1
Mark Streit 2 D 12/11/1977 197 6-0
John Tavares 91 C 9/20/1990 202 6-0
Tim Wallace 36 RW 8/6/1984 207 6-1
Ty Wishart 6 D 5/19/1988 222 6-4
Calvin de Haan 44 D 5/9/1991 187 6-1

Blog Bossy

Lhh-square_small Dominik

Enforcers & Snipers

Warlord2_small Mark D

Lighthouse_hockey_logo_2_medium_small Keith Quinn

Tubby_goalie_gif_small mikb

Hg_small Chris McNally

Master of FIGs and Power Tablature

Icon3_small ICanSeeForIslesAndIsles

Emeriti

Officials_sweater_1_small IslesOfficial

Headshot_small Michael Schuerlein

71096_479208120482_1257968_n_small David Hanssen