Crazy night in the NHL as Ovechkin tops Islanders in OT
Pardon the personal bent to this game reaction post; more game-specific info after the jump.
See, I was supposed to be working on a research paper last night, but a wild night in the NHL (57 goals in 9 games) intervened. It started with an in-game chat among a bunch of the Islanders bloggers, including one who chatted between in-class presentations. That chat was inadvertently cut off before the end of the game, which may be just as well, since it probably allowed us to focus more on the entertaining final 15 minutes of the game and less on cracking each other up via the wonders of modern communication.
More on the game later, but the odyssey continued on to Toronto, where old friend Jason Blake won the shootout over the Devils with a Blakey 360 move. Next to St. Louis, where my inner St. Louisan welcomed the newest SBN blog, St. Louis Game Time, as its ribald band of merry Blues fans watched a loss to the Flames. From there on to Edmonton for a slaughter (more below), and finally to Anaheim, where the Ran- ... the Rang- ... the Short Island Smurfs were visiting for your average California State Rape (also more below).
First, the good news: The Oilers lost 9-2 last night, so that just makes our Pittsburgh debacle all better, doesn't it? Only get this: The Oilers lost at home. In their vintage jerseys. Say what you will, but at least the Isles had the decency to suffer their 9-2 bludgeoning away from home fans, in RBK-icized unis. Now, you may say: "That doesn't take the smell off: The Oilers game was west of the Mississippi, so no one knows it happened. Only New York or Toronto games out West get noticed."
Maybe so, but I feel better. So there.
And for the bad news? About those New York games out West ...
As the busy NHL night migrated through the time zones, I switched to watching the west coast games and found the Short Island Smurfs tied in Anaheim 1-1. I figured, "Alright, the Ducks and the famed Battle of California State Rape (scroll down at your own risk) will take down the Rangers, no problem."
But it was not to be: Scott Niedermayer made a horrid turnover in his own zone to allow the first Rangers goal. Then with three minutes left in the third, game still tied, Chris Pronger -- he of the 10-foot reach and lethal elbows -- lets little Nigel Dawes walk around him and score uncontested! No matter what, you've likely had reason to hate Pronger at one time or another; well, I just acquired one more. He even capped it off by hooking Zherdev on an empty-net breakaway, causing one of those "automatic" goals as ruled by the refs. So much for the schadenfreude of a Rangers loss.
Still, it was a great night to be a hockey fan. And I still haven't finished the damn research paper.
The Islanders Played, Too
[Game Summary | Event Summary | nhl.com Recap]
Oh, but about the Islanders game. This time, when facing overwhelming firepower at home, the Islanders hung tough. They even made Caps fans feel bad for a period. They created the first sustained buzz all night in the second ... then promptly gave up the fourth goal to make it 4-2. But wait, there's more: They made something of the third period, outshooting the Caps 17-5 and tying -- yes tying -- the game on an inspired, exhausting power play effort as regulation neared its end. The Islanders had been outscored 46-22 in third periods before this game.
To see Weight, Guerin, Bailey and Streit just hanging on to the puck, refusing to give up, determined to use this man advantage opportunity to give something back to a crowd who trudged through some poor weather on a Tuesday night -- well that, that was satisfying. Something that couldn't be said of the previous six games.
I don't even feel all that bad about the Ovechkin winner because 1) he's freaking Ovechkin, hard to contain for five minutes of 4-on-4, and 2) it's freaking modern day OT, where the loser point frees up everything. It was an entertaining OT, and the Isles took their chances. That's all I ask this year; the rest is a roll of the dice.
Notes...
- Nice to see waiver wire survivor Jon Sim get the big goal -- his 3rd PP goal of the season.
- Brendan Witt: He was on for every Capitals goal, a minus-5. I sound like a broken record, but he's just not moving right, and I think that's due to more than being a less-than-ideal fit for Scott Gordon's system. Caps fans winced with us.
- I like Richard Park because he's a smart all-around hockey player who can fill any role, and about 10 or so times per season he scores a goal that shows us he's just a talented all-around player, too.
- Joey MacDonald responded well after two very ugly goals put the Isles in the 2-0 hole. Now, feeling greedy, I suddenly wonder: What if he hadn't given up those gifts? What then?
- In his game recap, Chris Botta got quotes from Capitals "GMGM" about how their rebuild went. Nice stuff for those wavering in faith, but a cautionary note as well:
“Another hard aspect of the whole thing is, you can come up with a plan, and for any of several reasons, it just does not work out. But we were fortunate the pieces came together for us."
Ovechkin, Semin, Backstrom, Green. Yeah, I'd say some pieces came together.
0 recs |
5 comments
|
Comments
The Caps rebuild has been great, no doubt, but there’s some luck involved, too – by rights, the Caps should have drafted third in 2004 and been “stuck” with Cam Barker. But they won the lottery and snagged AO and the rest is history. What’s the saying? Luck is where preparation meets opportunity? I think it fits here.
One minor note – Semin was drafted before the rebuild and played with Jagr er. al. (luckily, it hasn’t tainted him forever).
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Dec 17, 2008 7:49 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
Yeah it’s crazy to think Semin has been around that long. Maybe it took a while to get the Jagr taint off.
I guess my point was that these “pieces” must come together with luck — including having a potential star already in the system, or lucking into the right pick in the right draft year. Botta said in his piece not to look at Pittsburgh (so many top 3 picks) but rather at Washington as an example. But I think even the Capitals are an example of good fortune at the right time (like 2004) that the Islanders can’t simply plan on getting.
I get the sense some fans are expecting to get Tavares/Hedman/Next-Rah-Rah-Prospect and that will be that. But that assumes a lot (like finishing in the lottery and having the ball bounce our way) and ignores the likelihood there’s a lot more down the road to be done.
Lighthouse Hockey: an SB Nation New York Islanders blog with hip issues.
by Dominik on Dec 17, 2008 10:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep. There’s a lot more to it than landing the one superstar. If there’s crap around him, he won’t do you any good… ask Ilya.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Dec 17, 2008 11:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely. The Caps’ rebuild only worked when they consistently hit on first-round picks. In 02, the Caps had 3 first rounders, and turned them into Eminger, Semin, and Boyd Gordon. Those guys are all NHL players, though Eminger is in Tampa now (traded for a 1st rounder) and Gordon is a grinder. In 03, the Caps took Fehr in the first round, a NHL 2nd-3rd line winger. The real hit parade started in 04, with 3 first round hits (Ovechkin, Schultz, and Green). Then in 06, the Caps took Backstrom and Varlamov, and in 07, Alzner.
It wasn’t all roses: in 05 the Caps took two defensemen who probably won’t pan out in Pokulok and Finley in the first round. But overall, they made 12 (!) first round picks between 02 and 07 and converted 10 of those into quality NHL players, including two top-line wingers (Semin and Ovechkin), a top-line center (Backstrom), an all-star defenseman (Green), a guy who looks like a future top-pairing defenseman (Alzner), and a possible #1 goalie (Varlamov).
The lesson is that to rebuild effectively, you must hit on those top picks consistently. Pittsburgh rebuilt for a long time, but it went nowhere until they converted on their top picks a few years in a row. And you must develop the players. Ovechkin and Backstrom (and to a lesser extent, Alzner) were pretty much plug-and-play at the NHL level, but all of the others have spent various amounts of time learning in the Caps’ system.
What’s surprising about this to me as a Caps fan is that the franchise drafted and developed poorly for a very long time before this current run of prosperity, including in past years with McPhee as GM. In hindsight, it’s clear to me that one break (such as winning the draft lottery in a good year) can make an enormous difference, but it really takes a whole organizational philosophy focused on scouting and development to make a real rebuild work.
by grapejoos on Dec 17, 2008 4:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for all that background.
It will be interesting for the Isles not just with their draft record (including the 2008 class) but with the development part you mentioned. One positive is that Garth Snow specifically chose a coach he felt he could work long-term with and develop players with, sort of the Buffalo philosophy. So, having won owner Charles Wang’s confidence, I don’t think there will be pressure to fire one or the other when the on-ice record continues to dip.
An unknown is whether Gordon’s system, which worked at the AHL level, can work here — and whether he’ll be able to make any necessary adjustments to it if it’s not working as they (presumably) acquire and groom better players. Barring any glaring mistakes, I imagine that will be the first moment of real unrest: when fans start to say, “Okay, we were patient, but this thing should be working better by now.”
Lighthouse Hockey: an SB Nation New York Islanders blog with hip issues.
by Dominik on Dec 17, 2008 6:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 



























